1
|
Regazzoni CJ. World health order. J Glob Health 2024; 14:03023. [PMID: 38574352 PMCID: PMC10994669 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.14.03023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Javier Regazzoni
- Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kennedy University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Committee on Global Health and Human Security, Argentine Council on Foreign Relations, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Townsend B, Johnson TD, Ralston R, Cullerton K, Martin J, Collin J, Baum F, Arnanz L, Holmes R, Friel S. A framework of NGO inside and outside strategies in the commercial determinants of health: findings from a narrative review. Global Health 2023; 19:74. [PMID: 37817196 PMCID: PMC10565967 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00978-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Public health scholarship has uncovered a wide range of strategies used by industry actors to promote their products and influence government regulation. Less is known about the strategies used by non-government organisations to attempt to influence commercial practices. This narrative review applies a political science typology to identify a suite of 'inside' and 'outside' strategies used by NGOs to attempt to influence the commercial determinants of health. METHODS We conducted a systematic search in Web of Science, ProQuest and Scopus. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they comprised an empirical study, explicitly sought to examine 'NGOs', were in English, and identified at least one NGO strategy aimed at commercial and/or government policy and practice. RESULTS One hundred forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight industry sectors were identified: extractive, tobacco, food, alcohol, pharmaceuticals, weapons, textiles and asbestos, and a small number of general studies. We identified 18 types of NGO strategies, categorised according to the target (i.e. commercial actor or government actor) and type of interaction with the target (i.e. inside or outside). Of these, five NGO 'inside' strategies targeted commercial actors directly: 1) participation in partnerships and multistakeholder initiatives; 2) private meetings and roundtables; 3) engaging with company AGMs and shareholders; 4) collaborations other than partnerships; and 5) litigation. 'Outside' strategies targeting commercial actors through the mobilisation of public opinion included 1) monitoring and reporting; 2) protests at industry sites; 3) boycotts; 4) directly engaging the public; and 5) creative use of alternative spaces. Four NGO 'inside' strategies directly targeting government actors included: 1) lobbying; 2) drafting legislation, policies and standards; 3) providing technical support and training; and 4) litigation. NGO 'outside' strategies targeting government included 1) protests and public campaigns; 2) monitoring and reporting; 3) forum shifting; and 4) proposing and initiating alternative solutions. We identified three types of NGO impact: substantive, procedural, and normative. CONCLUSION The analysis presents a matrix of NGO strategies used to target commercial and government actors across a range of industry sectors. This framework can be used to guide examination of which NGO strategies are effective and appropriate, and which conditions enable NGO influence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- Australian Research Centre for Health Equity, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Timothy D Johnson
- Australian Research Centre for Health Equity, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Rob Ralston
- Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jane Martin
- Obesity Policy Coalition, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeff Collin
- Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fran Baum
- Stretton Health Equity & School of Social Science, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Rodney Holmes
- Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sharon Friel
- Australian Research Centre for Health Equity, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hawkins B, Barlow P, van Schalkwyk MC, Holden C. Brexit, trade and the governance of non-communicable diseases: a research agenda. Global Health 2023; 19:61. [PMID: 37612704 PMCID: PMC10463402 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00956-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The UK's post-Brexit trade strategy has potentially important implications for population health and equity. In particular, it will impact on the structural risk factors for non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including the consumption of health-harming commodities such as tobacco, alcohol and ultra-processed food and beverages. This article catalogues recent developments in UK trade policy. It then presents a narrative review of the existing research literature on trade and health and previous, prospective studies on the health impacts of Brexit. In so doing it identifies key questions and foci for a future research agenda on the implications of UK's emerging trade regime for NCD prevention. MAIN TEXT We identify five key areas for future research. (1) Additional scholarship to document the health effects of key trade agreements negotiated by the UK government; (2) The implications of these agreements for policy-making to address health impacts, including the potential for legal challenges under dispute settlement mechanisms; (3) The strategic objectives being pursued by the UK government and the extent to which they support or undermine public health; (4) The process of trade policy-making, its openness to public health interests and actors and the impact of the political and ideological legacy of Brexit on outcomes; (5) The impact of the UK's post-Brexit trade policy on partner countries and blocs and their cumulative impact on the global trade regime. CONCLUSIONS Further research is urgently need to understand the ways in which the UK's post-Brexit trade strategy will impact on NCDs and policy responses to address these, including the openness of the trade policy architecture to health issues. The outcomes of this process will have wider systemic effects on the global trade regime with implications for health. Researchers must be cognizant of the ideological components of the policy debate which have been absent from previous analysis of Brexit, trade and health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Hawkins
- MRC Epidemiology Unity, University of Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - Pepita Barlow
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Chris Holden
- School for Business and Society, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Townsend B, Tenni BF, Goldman S, Gleeson D. Public health advocacy strategies to influence policy agendas: lessons from a narrative review of success in trade policy. Global Health 2023; 19:60. [PMID: 37612767 PMCID: PMC10463651 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00960-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite accumulating evidence of the implications of trade policy for public health, trade and health sectors continue to operate largely in silos. Numerous barriers to advancing health have been identified, including the dominance of a neoliberal paradigm, powerful private sector interests, and constraints associated with policymaking processes. Scholars and policy actors have recommended improved governance practices for trade policy, including: greater transparency and accountability; intersectoral collaboration; the use of health impact assessments; South-South networking; and mechanisms for civil society participation. These policy prescriptions have been generated from specific cases, such as the World Trade Organization's Doha Declaration on TRIPS and Public Health or specific instances of trade-related policymaking at the national level. There has not yet been a comprehensive analysis of what enables the elevation of health goals on trade policy agendas. This narrative review seeks to address this gap by collating and analysing known studies across different levels of policymaking and different health issues. RESULTS Sixty-five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Health issues that received attention on trade policy agendas included: access to medicines, food nutrition and food security, tobacco control, non-communicable diseases, access to knowledge, and asbestos harm. This has occurred in instances of domestic and regional policymaking, and in bilateral, regional and global trade negotiations, as well as in trade disputes and challenges. We identified four enabling conditions for elevation of health in trade-related policymaking: favourable media attention; leadership by trade and health ministers; public support; and political party support. We identified six strategies successfully used by advocates to influence these conditions: using and translating multiple forms of evidence, acting in coalitions, strategic framing, leveraging exogenous factors, legal strategy, and shifting forums. CONCLUSION The analysis demonstrates that while technical evidence is important, political strategy is necessary for elevating health on trade agendas. The analysis provides lessons that can be explored in the wider commercial determinants of health where economic and health interests often collide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- Australian Research Centre for Health Equity, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| | - Brigitte Frances Tenni
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, The School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, 3010, Australia
| | - Sharni Goldman
- Australian Research Centre for Health Equity, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Deborah Gleeson
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lacy-Nichols J, Johnson M, Cullerton K. Commercial lobbying and political contributions: an Australian scoping review. Aust N Z J Public Health 2023; 47:100073. [PMID: 37478519 DOI: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many of the most effective and equitable policies to reduce the burden of non-communicable diseases threaten the interests of powerful corporations. A first step for public health advocates seeking to challenge powerful corporate interests is to understand the nature and extent of corporate political practices. This scoping review explored public health research on two political practices in Australia: lobbying and political donations. METHODS We searched six databases, two Google Advanced searches and 11 Australian public health websites. We screened 2866 documents in total, and extracted information about political practices, industry actors and datasets. RESULTS 62 studies published between 1980 and 2021 were identified, analysing public health advocacy, policy submissions, direct engagement with government representatives and political donations. We extracted data from 14 studies that focused on direct engagement and/or political donations. Most focused on 'unhealthy commodity industries.' CONCLUSIONS Analysis of lobbying and political contributions in Australia is a nascent but expanding area of public health research. We discuss opportunities for future research to strengthen the evidence base and support public health advocacy to counter harmful corporate practices and promote and protect population health. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH Countering powerful commercial interests requires greater investment in understanding corporate political activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Lacy-Nichols
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, 3010 VIC Australia.
| | - Maggie Johnson
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Russell C, Schram A, Salmon L, Carrad A, Barbour L, Lacy-Nichols J, Huse O, Machado P, Gilbert J, Zorbas C, Thompson C. Interdisciplinary insights on the future of food systems research: perspectives from the next generation of research leaders. Public Health Nutr 2022; 25:3235-3239. [PMID: 35942634 PMCID: PMC9991564 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980022001641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Our dominant food system is a primary driver of worsening human and planetary health. Held in March 2022, the Public Health Association of Australia's Food Futures Conference was an opportunity for people working across the food system to connect and advocate for a comprehensive, intersectoral, whole-of-society food and nutrition policy in Australia to attenuate these issues. Conference themes included food systems for local and global good; ecological nutrition; social mobilisation for planetary and public good; food sovereignty and food equity. Students and young professionals are integral in transforming food systems, yet they are under-represented in the academic workforce, across publishing, scientific societies and conference plenaries. A satellite event was held to platform initiatives from early career researchers (ECR) in areas integral for improving planetary and public good. The research topics discussed in this commentary reflect sub-themes of the conference under investigation by ECR: food systems governance and regulation; local food policies; commercial determinants of health; sustainable healthy diets; and food equity and sovereignty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherie Russell
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia
- Corresponding author: Email
| | - Ashley Schram
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Libby Salmon
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Amy Carrad
- School of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Liza Barbour
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Lacy-Nichols
- Centre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Oliver Huse
- Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Priscila Machado
- School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Joshua Gilbert
- Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous Education, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia
| | - Christina Zorbas
- Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Courtney Thompson
- Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Faculty of Health, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
AbstractGlobal trade has shaped food systems over centuries, but modern trade agreements are hastening these changes and making them more complex, with implications for public health and nutrition transition. This study aimed to understand the impact of the 2018 Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) on the policy space for public health nutrition in Vietnam. We conducted comparative document review and key informant interviews, and our analysis drew on a framework of policy space and the theory of advocacy coalitions. We identified 10 CPTPP sections with potential public health nutrition implications; and 50 Vietnamese policies relevant to nutrition having one or more tensions with one or more CPTPP sections. A majority of policy tensions were in sections of the CPTPP relating to technical barriers to trade and government procurement; most tensions related to protecting policy-making from vested interests. Different groups of policy actors hold different beliefs and interests on these issues, and therefore promote different framings and policy approaches. We identified two advocacy coalitions working very separately on issues affecting nutrition policy space: a trade coalition holding the policy position that free trade improves nutrition by default; and a nutrition coalition holding the policy position that nutrition should be explicitly considered in trade policy. The policy space for nutrition in Vietnam has important potential constraints through written policy, and the trade and nutrition coalitions will need to interact more regularly and constructively in order to foresee where these tensions will arise in practice, and create plans for their mitigation. This study adds to global evidence of free trade agreement impacts on nutrition policy space, and we extend previous work by explaining these actor groupings in the policy space through the theory of advocacy coalitions.
Collapse
|
8
|
Garton K, Swinburn B, Thow AM. Who influences nutrition policy space using international trade and investment agreements? A global stakeholder analysis. Global Health 2021; 17:118. [PMID: 34600556 PMCID: PMC8487514 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00764-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Regulation of food environments is needed to address the global challenge of poor nutrition, yet policy inertia has been a problem. A common argument against regulation is potential conflict with binding commitments under international trade and investment agreements (TIAs). This study aimed to identify which actors and institutions, in different contexts, influence how TIAs are used to constrain policy space for improving food environments, and to describe their core beliefs, interests, resources and strategies, with the objective of informing strategic global action to preserve nutrition policy space. Methods We conducted a global stakeholder analysis applying the Advocacy Coalition Framework, based on existing academic literature and key informant interviews with international experts in trade and investment law and public health nutrition policy. Results We identified 12 types of actors who influence policy space in the food environment policy subsystem, relevant to TIAs. These actors hold various beliefs regarding the economic policy paradigm, the nature of obesity and dietary diseases as health problems, the role of government, and the role of industry in solving the health problem. We identified two primary competing coalitions: 1) a ‘public health nutrition’ coalition, which is overall supportive of and actively working to enact comprehensive food environment regulation; and 2) an ‘industry and economic growth’ focussed coalition, which places a higher priority on deregulation and is overall not supportive of comprehensive food environment regulation. The industry and economic growth coalition appears to be dominant, based on its relative power, resources and coordination. However, the public health nutrition coalition maintains influence through individual activism, collective lobbying and government pressure (e.g. by civil society), and expert knowledge generation. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that industry and economic growth-focussed coalitions are highly capable of leveraging networks, institutional structures and ideologies to their advantage, and are a formidable source of opposition acting to constrain nutrition policy space globally, including through TIAs. Opportunities for global public health nutrition coalitions to strengthen their influence in the support of nutrition policy space include strategic evidence generation and coalition-building through broader engagement and capacity-building. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12992-021-00764-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Garton
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Boyd Swinburn
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Anne Marie Thow
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Townsend B, Friel S, Schram A, Baum F, Labonté R. What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership. Int J Health Policy Manag 2021; 10:613-624. [PMID: 32610761 PMCID: PMC9278530 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite greater attention to the nexus between trade and investment agreements and their potential impacts on public health, less is known regarding the political and governance conditions that enable or constrain attention to health issues on government trade agendas. Drawing on interviews with key stakeholders in the Australian trade domain, this article provides novel insights from policy actors into the range of factors that can enable or constrain attention to health in trade negotiations. METHODS A qualitative case study was chosen focused on Australia's participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations and the domestic agenda-setting processes that shaped the government's negotiating mandate. Process tracing via document analysis of media reporting, parliamentary records and government inquiries identified key events during Australia's participation in the TPP negotiations. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 25 key government and non-government policy actors including Federal politicians, public servants, representatives from public interest nongovernment organisations and industry associations, and academic experts. RESULTS Interviews revealed that domestic concerns for protecting regulatory space for access to generic medicines and tobacco control emerged onto the Australian government's trade agenda. This contrasted with other health issues like alcohol control and nutrition and food systems that did not appear to receive attention. The analysis suggests sixteen key factors that shaped attention to these different health issues, including the strength of exporter interests; extent of political will of Trade and Health Ministers; framing of health issues; support within the major political parties; exogenous influencing events; public support; the strength of available evidence and the presence of existing domestic legislation and international treaties, among others. CONCLUSION These findings aid understanding of the factors that can enable or constrain attention to health issues on government trade agendas, and offer insights for potential pathways to elevate greater attention to health in future. They provide a suite of conditions that appear to shape attention to health outside the biomedical health domain for further research in the commercial determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Sharon Friel
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Ashley Schram
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Fran Baum
- Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Department of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ronald Labonté
- Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Townsend B. Defending access to medicines in regional trade agreements: lessons from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership - a qualitative study of policy actors' views. Global Health 2021; 17:78. [PMID: 34238347 PMCID: PMC8264472 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00721-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) is a mega regional trade agreement signed by fifteen countries on 15 November 2020 after 8 years of negotiation. Signatories include the ten members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) plus China, New Zealand, Japan, South Korea and Australia. India was a negotiating party until it withdrew from the negotiations in November 2019. The RCEP negotiations were initially framed as focused on the needs of low income countries. Public health concerns emerged however when draft negotiating chapters were leaked online, revealing pressures on countries to agree to intellectual property and investment measures that could exacerbate issues of access to medicines and seeds, and protecting regulatory space for public health. A concerted Asia Pacific civil society campaign emerged in response to these concerns, and in 2019, media and government reporting suggested that several of these measures had been taken off the table, which was subsequently confirmed in the release of the signed text in November 2020. Results This paper examines civil society and health actors’ views of the conditions that successfully contributed to the removal of these measures in RCEP, with a focus on intellectual property and access to medicines. Drawing on twenty semi-structured qualitative interviews with civil society, government and legal and health experts from nine countries participating in the RCEP negotiations, the paper reports a matrix of ten conditions related to actor power, ideas, political context and specific health issues that appeared to support prioritisation of some public health concerns in the RCEP negotiations. Conclusions Conditions identified included strong low and middle income country leadership; strong civil society mobilisation, increased technical capacity of civil society and low and middle income negotiators; supportive public health norms; processes that somewhat opened up the negotiations to hear public health views; the use of evidence; domestic support for health issues; and supportive international public health legislation. Lessons from the RCEP can inform prioritisation of public health in future trade agreement negotiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Friel S, Townsend B, Fisher M, Harris P, Freeman T, Baum F. Power and the people's health. Soc Sci Med 2021; 282:114173. [PMID: 34192622 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Public policy plays a central role in creating and distributing resources and conditions of daily life that matter for health equity. Policy agendas have tended to focus on health care delivery and individualised interventions. Asking why there is a lack of policy action on structural drivers of health inequities raises questions about power inequities in policy systems that maintain the status quo. In this paper we investigate the power dynamics shaping public policy and implications for health equity. Using a Health Equity Power Framework (HEPF), we examined data from 158 qualitative interviews with government, industry and civil society actors across seven policy case studies covering areas of macroeconomics, employment, social protection, welfare reform, health care, infrastructure and land use planning. The influence of structures of capitalism, neoliberalism, sexism, colonisation, racism and biomedicalism were widely evident, manifested through the ideologies, behaviours and discourses of state, market, and civil actors and the institutional spaces they occupied. Structurally less powerful public interest actors made creative use of existing or new institutional spaces, and used network, discursive and moral power to influence policy, with some success in moderating inequities in structural and institutional forms of power. Our hope is that the methodological advancement and empirical data presented here helps to illuminate how public interest actors can navigate structural power inequities in the policy system in order to disrupt the status quo and advance a comprehensive policy agenda on the social determinants of health equity. However, this analysis highlights the unrealistic expectation of turning health inequities around in a short time given the long-term embedded power dynamics and inequities within policy systems under late capitalism. Achieving health equity is a power-saturated long game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Friel
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Fellows Road, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Belinda Townsend
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Fellows Road, Canberra ACT, 2601, Australia.
| | - Matthew Fisher
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Patrick Harris
- Centre for Health Equity Training, Research & Evaluation, Australia Research Centre for Primary Health Care & Equity, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW, 1871, Australia.
| | - Toby Freeman
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| | - Fran Baum
- Southgate Institute for Society, Equity and Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Schalkwyk MCI, Barlow P, Siles-Brügge G, Jarman H, Hervey T, McKee M. Brexit and trade policy: an analysis of the governance of UK trade policy and what it means for health and social justice. Global Health 2021; 17:61. [PMID: 34107982 PMCID: PMC8188541 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00697-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an extensive body of research demonstrating that trade and globalisation can have wide-ranging implications for health. Robust governance is key to ensuring that health, social justice and sustainability are key considerations within trade policy, and that health risks from trade are effectively mitigated and benefits are maximised. The UK's departure from the EU provides a rare opportunity to examine a context where trade governance arrangements are being created anew, and to explore the consequences of governance choices and structures for health and social justice. Despite its importance to public health, there has been no systematic analysis of the implications of UK trade policy governance. We therefore conducted an analysis of the governance of the UK's trade policy from a public health and social justice perspective. RESULTS Several arrangements required for good governance appear to have been implemented - information provision, public consultation, accountability to Parliament, and strengthening of civil service capacity. However, our detailed analyses of these pillars of governance identified significant weaknesses in each of these areas. CONCLUSION The establishment of a new trade policy agenda calls for robust systems of governance. However, our analysis demonstrates that, despite decades of mounting evidence on the health and equity impacts of trade and the importance of strong systems of governance, the UK government has largely ignored this evidence and failed to galvanise the opportunity to include public health and equity considerations and strengthen democratic involvement in trade policy. This underscores the point that the evidence alone will not guarantee that health and justice are prioritised. Rather, we need strong systems of governance everywhere that can help seize the health benefits of international trade and minimise its detrimental impacts. A failure to strengthen governance risks poor policy design and implementation, with unintended and inequitable distribution of harms, and 'on-paper' commitments to health, social justice, and democracy unfulfilled in practice. Although the detailed findings relate to the situation in the UK, the issues raised are, we believe, of wider relevance for those with an interest of governing for health in the area of international trade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- May C I van Schalkwyk
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Pepita Barlow
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | - Gabriel Siles-Brügge
- Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Holly Jarman
- Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tamara Hervey
- The City Law School, City, University of London, London, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miller M, Wilkinson C, Room R, O'Brien P, Townsend B, Schram A, Gleeson D. Industry submissions on alcohol in the context of Australia's trade and investment agreements: A content and thematic analysis of publicly available documents. Drug Alcohol Rev 2020; 40:22-30. [PMID: 33230913 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Alcohol use is a leading risk factor for death and disability, responsible for 3 million deaths in 2016. The alcohol industry is a powerful player in shaping trade and investment rules in ways that can constrain the ability of governments to regulate alcoholic beverages to reduce harm. This paper analyses publicly available submissions about alcohol in the context of Australia's free trade agreements to determine the key themes put forward by industry. DESIGN AND METHODS We searched for submissions made to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade by alcohol industry trade associations, alcohol manufacturers, distributors and retailers, general industry association, and government agencies with responsibilities for alcohol trade, about specific free trade agreements involving Australia. Thirty-one submissions in relation to eight trade agreements were included for analysis. The analysis involved both descriptive content analysis and thematic analysis. RESULTS Findings suggest that industry is actively seeking to shape trade negotiations around alcohol. Priority issues for the industry include improving market access, harmonising regulation, improving clarity and transparency, reducing the burden of regulation and preventing monopolies on product names. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The alcohol industry and associated business and government organisations are actively working to influence trade agreement negotiations for industry economic gain, arguing for rules which may undermine public health goals. The analysis suggests that public health experts should pay attention to trade and investment agreements and develop counter frames to ensure agreements do not create barriers for coherent health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Miller
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claire Wilkinson
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Drug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robin Room
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paula O'Brien
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Belinda Townsend
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Ashley Schram
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Deborah Gleeson
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Townsend B. Next Steps for Elevating Health on Trade and Investment Policy Agendas Comment on "How Neoliberalism Is Shaping the Supply of Unhealthy Commodities and What This Means for NCD Prevention". Int J Health Policy Manag 2020; 9:312-314. [PMID: 32613803 PMCID: PMC7444437 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite intergovernmental calls for greater policy coherence to tackle rising non-communicable diseases (NCDs), there has been a striking lack of coherence internationally and nationally between trade and health sectors. In this commentary, I explore the arguments by Lenucha and Thow in relation to barriers for greater coherence for NCDs, apply them to regional trade agreements, and point to next steps in research and advocacy for greater attention to health and NCD prevention in government trade agendas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Friel S, Schram A, Townsend B. The nexus between international trade, food systems, malnutrition and climate change. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1038/s43016-019-0014-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
16
|
Townsend B, Schram A, Labonté R, Baum F, Friel S. How do actors with asymmetrical power assert authority in policy agenda-setting? A study of authority claims by health actors in trade policy. Soc Sci Med 2019; 236:112430. [PMID: 31351362 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
How health advocates and industry actors attempt to assert their authority as a strategy of influence in policymaking remains underexplored in the health governance literature. Greater exploration of the kinds of authority sources used by health actors vis-à-vis market actors and the role ideational factors may play in shaping access to these sources provides insight into advocates' efforts to exert influence in policy forums. Using the trade domain in Australia as a case study of the way in which the commercial determinants of health operate, we examined the different ways in which health, public interest and market actors assert their authority. Drawing on a political science typology of authority, we analysed 87 submissions to the Australian government during the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations. We identify four types of authority claims; institutional authority, derived from holding a position of influence within another established institution; legal authority through appeals to legal agreements and precedents; networked authority through cross-referencing between actors, and expert authority through use of evidence. Combining these claims with a framing analysis, we found that these bases of authority were invoked differently by actors who shared the dominant neoliberal ideology in contrast to those actors that shared a public interest discourse. In particular, market actors were much less likely to rely on external sources of authority, while health and public interest actors were more likely to appeal to networked and expert authority. We argue that actors who share strong ideational alignment with the dominant policy discourse appear less reliant on other sources of authority. Implications of this analysis include the need for greater attention to the different strategies and ideas used by industry and public health organisations in trade policy agenda-setting for health, which ultimately enable or constrain the advancement of health on government agendas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Townsend
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, Australia.
| | - Ashley Schram
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, Australia.
| | - Ronald Labonté
- Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
| | - Fran Baum
- Southgate Institute for Health, Society and Equity, Department of Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, 5042, Australia.
| | - Sharon Friel
- School of Regulation and Global Governance, College of Asia and the Pacific, Australian National University, Canberra, 0200, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|