1
|
D’Adamo L, Paraboschi L, Grammer AC, Fennig M, Graham AK, Yaeger LH, Newman MG, Wilfley DE, Taylor CB, Eisenberg D, Fitzsimmons-Craft EE. Reach and uptake of digital mental health interventions based on cognitive-behavioral therapy for college students: A systematic review. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE THERAPY 2023; 33:97-117. [PMID: 37724304 PMCID: PMC10506850 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbct.2023.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Background Mental health problems are increasing in prevalence among college students, yet few students receive treatment due to barriers such as insufficient resources in college counseling centers. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) have potential to overcome barriers and offer accessible, evidence-based care to college students. However, to evaluate the true public health impact of evidence-based DMHIs, it is important to assess the reach and uptake rates of DMHIs on college campuses. Objectives We conducted a systematic review to examine the reach (i.e., % of invited students who express interest) and uptake (i.e., % of enrolled participants who initiate an intervention) of DMHIs based on cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for college students. Methods Eight databases were searched. Inclusion criteria included: (1) college population; (2) experimental design; (3) CBT-based intervention; (4) intervention targeting specific mental health conditions; and (5) digital intervention. Reach and uptake rates were calculated from data reported. A systematic narrative review framework was used to synthesize results. Results Of 10,315 articles screened, 90 were included. Seventeen studies (19%) reported sufficient data to calculate reach; 35 studies (39%) reported uptake rates. Of studies that reported reach or uptake, most evaluated unguided (n = 20) or guided (n = 16) self-help programs. Measurement methods varied widely. Overall reach was low, whereas uptake was high among enrolled participants. Discussion Despite evidence that improving reach and uptake can increase the public health impact of DMHIs, most studies did not report on either outcome. Suggested practices to improve these outcomes, and their reporting, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura D’Adamo
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences and Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science (WELL Center), Drexel University, 3201 Chestnut St. Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Layna Paraboschi
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Anne Claire Grammer
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Molly Fennig
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Andrea K. Graham
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 633 N St Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Lauren H. Yaeger
- Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Michelle G. Newman
- Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 371 Moore Building, University Park, PA 16801, USA
| | - Denise E. Wilfley
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - C. Barr Taylor
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
- Center for m Health, Palo Alto University, 5150 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA
| | - Daniel Eisenberg
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - Ellen E. Fitzsimmons-Craft
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, Mailstop 8134-29-2100, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Advances in digital CBT: where are we now, and where next? COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPIST 2022; 15:E44. [DOI: 10.1017/s1754470x22000423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Digital CBT refers to the use of digital tools, platforms or devices to deliver or enhance cognitive behavioural therapy assessment, formulation, treatment, training and supervision. The ‘Advances in Digital CBT’ special issue aimed to document examples of innovative digital CBT practice in this rapidly developing field. In this paper, we have briefly summarised and synthesised the advances demonstrated in this group of articles. These include developments in our understanding of mental health apps, the use of digital tools as an adjunct to therapy, the effectiveness of remotely delivered CBT in routine clinical practice, our understanding of user experiences and involvement, and in digital CBT research methods. We consider the extent of current knowledge in these areas and identify where gaps in evidence lie and how the field could be taken forward to address these. Lastly, we reflect on the broader digital CBT picture and offer our suggestions of six key directions for future research: using robust study designs to evaluate and optimise digital tools; translating and culturally adapting digital tools and practices; understanding and addressing digital exclusion; exploring, reporting and addressing possible negative effects; improving user involvement in design and evaluation; and addressing the implementation gap for digital tools. We suggest that further advances in these areas would be of particular benefit to the digital CBT field.
Key learning aims
(1)
To gain an overview of the articles in the special issue and an understanding of the advances in digital CBT they represent.
(2)
To understand how the advances suggested by the present studies could be taken forward and extended.
(3)
To consider key future directions for further advances in digital CBT.
Collapse
|