Generation of multiple reporter ions from a single isobaric reagent increases multiplexing capacity for quantitative proteomics

Enhanced Multiplexing Technology for Proteomics

The identification of thousands of proteins and their relative levels of expression has furthered understanding of biological processes and disease and stimulated new systems biology hypotheses. Quantitative proteomics workflows that rely on analytical assays such as mass spectrometry have facilitated high-throughput measurements of proteins partially due to multiplexing. Multiplexing allows proteome differences across multiple samples to be measured simultaneously, resulting in more accurate quantitation, increased statistical robustness, reduced analysis times, and lower experimental costs. The number of samples that can be multiplexed has evolved from as few as two to more than 50, with studies involving more than 10 samples being denoted as enhanced multiplexing or hyperplexing. In this review, we give an update on emerging multiplexing proteomics techniques and highlight advantages and limitations for enhanced multiplexing strategies.

Chemical isotope labeling for quantitative proteomics

Advancements in liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry over the last decades have led to a significant development in mass spectrometry-based proteome quantification approaches. An increasingly attractive strategy is multiplex isotope labeling, which significantly improves the accuracy, precision and throughput of quantitative proteomics in the data-dependent acquisition mode. Isotope labeling-based approaches can be classified into MS1-based and MS2-based quantification. In this review, we give an overview of approaches based on chemical isotope labeling and discuss their principles, benefits, and limitations with the goal to give insights into fundamental questions and provide a useful reference for choosing a method for quantitative proteomics. As a perspective, we discuss the current possibilities and limitations of multiplex, isotope labeling approaches for the data-independent acquisition mode, which is increasing in popularity.

Single-cell proteomics enabled by next-generation sequencing or mass spectrometry

In the last decade, single-cell RNA sequencing routinely performed on large numbers of single cells has greatly advanced our understanding of the underlying heterogeneity of complex biological systems. Technological advances have also enabled protein measurements, further contributing to the elucidation of cell types and states present in complex tissues. Recently, there have been independent advances in mass spectrometric techniques bringing us one step closer to characterizing single-cell proteomes. Here we discuss the challenges of detecting proteins in single cells by both mass spectrometry and sequencing-based methods. We review the state of the art for these techniques and propose that there is a space for technological advancements and complementary approaches that maximize the advantages of both classes of technologies.

Proteomic analysis of antiviral innate immunity

The capacity of host cells to detect and restrict an infecting virus rests on an array of cell-autonomous antiviral effectors and innate immune receptors that can trigger inflammatory processes at tissue and organismal levels. Dynamic changes in protein abundance, subcellular localisation, post-translational modifications and interactions with other biomolecules govern these processes. Proteomics is therefore an ideal experimental tool to discover novel mechanisms of host antiviral immunity. Additional information can be gleaned both about host and virus by systematic analysis of viral immune evasion strategies. In this review, we summarise recent advances in proteomic technologies and their application to antiviral innate immunity.

Isobaric labeling: Expanding the breadth, accuracy, depth, and diversity of sample multiplexing

Isobaric labeling has rapidly become a predominant strategy for proteome-wide abundance measurements. Coupled to mass spectrometry, sample multiplexing techniques using isobaric labeling are unparalleled for profiling proteins and posttranslational modifications across multiple samples in a single experiment. Here, I highlight aspects of isobaric labeling in the context of expanding the breadth of multiplexing, improving quantitative accuracy and proteome depth, and developing a wide range of diverse applications. I underscore two facets that enhance quantitative accuracy and reproducibility, specifically the availability of quality control standards for isobaric labeling experiments and the evolution of data acquisition methods. I also emphasize the necessity for standardized methodologies, particularly for emerging high-throughput workflows. Future developments in sample multiplexing will further strengthen the importance of isobaric labeling for comprehensive proteome profiling.

Recent advances in isobaric labeling and applications in quantitative proteomics

Mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged at the forefront of quantitative proteomic techniques. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) can be used to determine abundances of proteins and peptides in complex biological samples. Several methods have been developed and adapted for accurate quantification based on chemical isotopic labeling. Among various chemical isotopic labeling techniques, isobaric tagging approaches rely on the analysis of peptides from MS2-based quantification rather than MS1-based quantification. In this review, we will provide an overview of several isobaric tags along with some recent developments including complementary ion tags, improvements in sensitive quantitation of analytes with lower abundance, strategies to increase multiplexing capabilities, and targeted analysis strategies. We will also discuss limitations of isobaric tags and approaches to alleviate these restrictions through bioinformatic tools and data acquisition methods. This review will highlight several applications of isobaric tags, including biomarker discovery and validation, thermal proteome profiling, cross-linking for structural investigations, single-cell analysis, top-down proteomics, along with applications to different molecules including neuropeptides, glycans, metabolites, and lipids, while providing considerations and evaluations to each application.

Understanding the effect of carrier proteomes in single cell proteomic studies - key lessons

INTRODUCTION

Mass spectrometry based single cell proteomics (scMS) is experiencing rapid evolution due to the increased sensitivity of mass spectrometers as well as advances in multiplexing and sample preparation. To date, researchers have focused on two general approaches to scMS: label free and isobaric label based multiplexing. While label free analysis provides straightforward sample preparation and a clear path to automation, it currently lacks the throughput necessary to practically analyze thousands of single cells. Multiplexed analysis utilizing isobaric labels requires additional sample manipulation, but increases throughput such that analyzing thousands of cells is currently achievable. A key feature of multiplexed scMS experiments is a 'carrier proteome' - a sample added at 25x-500x the single cell samples that increases the number of proteins that can be identified in an MS analysis.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we review early examples of carrier proteomes in quantitative proteomics before summarizing advantages and challenges of using a carrier proteome in scMS experiments.

EXPERT OPINION

We conclude that the addition of carrier proteomes improves depth of identification for scMS, but high levels of carrier proteomes can have adverse effects on quantitative accuracy and precision.

Review of the Real and Sometimes Hidden Costs in Proteomics Experimental Workflows

A typical proteomics workflow covers all the steps from growing or collecting the cells/tissues/organism, protein extraction, digestion and cleanup, mass spectrometric analysis, and, finally, extensive bioinformatics to derive biological insight from the data. The details of the procedures employed for this can vary widely by laboratory and by sample type: e.g., hard tissues or cells with walls require much more mechanical disruption to extract proteins than do soft tissues, biological fluids, or wall-less cells. Everything then converges on the mass spectrometer, where there are further choices to be made about how to do the analysis. There is one commonality, however, virtually every group around the world now uses liquid chromatography on-line coupled to tandem mass spectrometry, which means that significant amounts of instrument time are dedicated to every sample. There are many other reviews or methods papers, including in this volume, that cover the details of the various procedures involved in proteomic analyses of all types of samples. Our focus here will be on the cost considerations for such analyses, including considerations to ensure that useful data can be obtained the first time a sample is analyzed. Some of these costs are often overlooked, particularly for those groups who operate their own mass spectrometer(s) and do not have to go to a fee-for-service facility to have something analyzed. The chapter presents several challenges and key suggestions in proving hypotheses in proteomics experimental workflow in different biological systems with specific regard to the costs involved, both real and hidden. The detailed methodology for cost-based studies reported in this chapter can help researchers to set up their laboratory with appropriate equipment as well as to identify potential collaborations based on their analytical instrumentation.

Strategies for mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteomics using isobaric tagging

INTRODUCTION

Protein phosphorylation is a primary mechanism of signal transduction in cellular systems. Isobaric tagging can be used to investigate alterations in phosphorylation events in sample multiplexing experiments where quantification extends across all conditions. As such, innovations in tandem mass tag methods can facilitate the expansion of the depth and breadth of phosphoproteomic analyses.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current state of tandem mass tag-centric phosphoproteomics and highlights advances in reagent chemistry, instrumentation, data acquisition, and data analysis. We stress that approaches for phosphoproteomic investigations require high-specificity enrichment, sensitive detection, and accurate phosphorylation site localization.

EXPERT OPINION

Tandem mass tag-centric phosphoproteomics will continue to be an important conduit for our understanding of signal transduction in living organisms. We anticipate that progress in phosphopeptide enrichment methodologies, enhancements in instrumentation and data acquisition technologies, and further refinements in analytical strategies will be key to the discovery of biologically relevant findings from phosphoproteomics studies.

NHS-Ester Tandem Labeling in One Pot Enables 48-Plex Quantitative Proteomics

Stable-isotope labeling strategies are extensively used for multiplex quantitative proteomics. Hybrid-isotope labeling strategies that combine the use of isotopic mass difference labeling and isobaric tags can greatly increase sample multiplexity. In this work, we present a novel hybrid-isotope labeling approach that we termed NHS-ester tandem labeling in one pot (NETLOP). We first optimized 16-plex isobaric TMTpro labeling of lysine residues followed by 2-plex or 3-plex isotopic mTRAQ labeling of peptide N-termini, both of which with commercially available NHS-ester reactive reagents. We then demonstrated the utility of the NETLOP approach by labeling HeLa cell samples and performing proof-of-principle quantitative 32-plex and 48-plex proteomic analyses, each in a single LC-MS/MS experiment. Compared to current hybrid-isotope labeling methods, our NETLOP approach requires no sample cleanup between different labeling steps to minimize sample loss, induces no retention time shifts that compromise quantification accuracy, can be adapted to other NHS-ester isotopic labeling reagents to further increase multiplexity, and is compatible with samples from any origin in a wide array of biological and clinical proteomics applications.

Proteomics in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry: a look to the next decade

INTRODUCTION

Pioneering technologies such as proteomics have helped fuel the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry with the discovery of novel targets and an intricate understanding of the activity of therapeutics and their various activities in vitro and in vivo. The field of proteomics is undergoing an inflection point, where new sensitive technologies are allowing intricate biological pathways to be better understood, and novel biochemical tools are pivoting us into a new era of chemical proteomics and biomarker discovery. In this review, we describe these areas of innovation, and discuss where the fields are headed in terms of fueling biotechnological and pharmacological research and discuss current gaps in the proteomic technology landscape.

AREAS COVERED

Single cell sequencing and single molecule sequencing. Chemoproteomics. Biological matrices and clinical samples including biomarkers. Computational tools including instrument control software, data analysis.

EXPERT OPINION

Proteomics will likely remain a key technology in the coming decade, but will have to evolve with respect to type and granularity of data, cost and throughput of data generation as well as integration with other technologies to fulfill its promise in drug discovery.

Quantitative Temporal Viromics

The abundance, localization, modifications, and protein-protein interactions of many host cell and virus proteins can change dynamically throughout the course of any viral infection. Studying these changes is critical for a comprehensive understanding of how viruses replicate and cause disease, as well as for the development of antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Previously, we developed a mass spectrometry-based technique called quantitative temporal viromics (QTV), which employs isobaric tandem mass tags (TMTs) to allow precise comparative quantification of host and virus proteomes through a whole time course of infection. In this review, we discuss the utility and applications of QTV, exemplified by numerous studies that have since used proteomics with a variety of quantitative techniques to study virus infection through time. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Virology, Volume 8 is September 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

iDRiP for the systematic discovery of proteins bound directly to noncoding RNA

More than 90% of the human genome is transcribed into noncoding RNAs, but their functional characterization has lagged behind. A major bottleneck in the understanding of their functions and mechanisms has been a dearth of systematic methods for identifying interacting protein partners. There now exist several methods, including identification of direct RNA interacting proteins (iDRiP), chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP), and RNA antisense purification, each previously applied towards identifying a proteome for the prototype noncoding RNA, Xist. iDRiP has recently been modified to successfully identify proteomes for two additional noncoding RNAs of interest, TERRA and U1 RNA. Here we describe the modified protocol in detail, highlighting technical differences that facilitate capture of various noncoding RNAs. The protocol can be applied to short and long RNAs in both cultured cells and tissues, and requires ~1 week from start to finish. Here we also perform a comparative analysis between iDRiP and ChIRP. We obtain partially overlapping profiles, but find that iDRiP yields a greater number of specific proteins and fewer mitochondrial contaminants. With an increasing number of essential long noncoding RNAs being described, robust RNA-centric protein capture methods are critical for the probing of noncoding RNA function and mechanism.

Defining the carrier proteome limit for single-cell proteomics

Single-cell proteomics by mass spectrometry (SCoPE-MS) is a recently introduced method to quantify multiplexed single-cell proteomes. While this technique has generated great excitement, the underlying technologies (isobaric labeling and mass spectrometry (MS)) have technical limitations with the potential to affect data quality and biological interpretation. These limitations are particularly relevant when a carrier proteome, a sample added at 25-500× the amount of a single-cell proteome, is used to enable peptide identifications. Here we perform controlled experiments with increasing carrier proteome amounts and evaluate quantitative accuracy, as it relates to mass analyzer dynamic range, multiplexing level and number of ions sampled. We demonstrate that an increase in carrier proteome level requires a concomitant increase in the number of ions sampled to maintain quantitative accuracy. Lastly, we introduce Single-Cell Proteomics Companion (SCPCompanion), a software tool that enables rapid evaluation of single-cell proteomic data and recommends instrument and data analysis parameters for improved data quality.

Mass Spectrometry Advances and Perspectives for the Characterization of Emerging Adoptive Cell Therapies

Adoptive cell therapy is an emerging anti-cancer modality, whereby the patient's own immune cells are engineered to express T-cell receptor (TCR) or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR). CAR-T cell therapies have advanced the furthest, with recent approvals of two treatments by the Food and Drug Administration of Kymriah (trisagenlecleucel) and Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel). Recent developments in proteomic analysis by mass spectrometry (MS) make this technology uniquely suited to enable the comprehensive identification and quantification of the relevant biochemical architecture of CAR-T cell therapies and fulfill current unmet needs for CAR-T product knowledge. These advances include improved sample preparation methods, enhanced separation technologies, and extension of MS-based proteomic to single cells. Innovative technologies such as proteomic analysis of raw material quality attributes (MQA) and final product quality attributes (PQA) may provide insights that could ultimately fuel development strategies and lead to broad implementation.

Mass spectrometric approaches for profiling protein folding and stability

Protein stability reports on protein homeostasis, function, and binding interactions, such as to other proteins, metabolites and drugs. As such, there is a pressing need for technologies that can report on protein stability. The ideal technique could be applied in vitro or in vivo systems, proteome-wide, independently of matrix, under native conditions, with residue-level resolution, and on protein at endogenous levels. Mass spectrometry has rapidly become a preferred technology for identifying and quantifying proteins. As such, it has been increasingly incorporated into methodologies for interrogating protein stability and folding. Although no single technology can satisfy all desired applications, several emerging approaches have shown outstanding success at providing biological insight into the stability of the proteome. This chapter outlines some of these recent emerging technologies.

Evaluating False Transfer Rates from the Match-between-Runs Algorithm with a Two-Proteome Model

Stochasticity between independent LC-MS/MS runs is a challenging problem in the field of proteomics, resulting in significant missing values (i.e., abundance measurements) among observed peptides. To address this issue, several approaches have been developed including computational methods such as MaxQuant's match-between-runs (MBR) algorithm. Often dozens of runs are all considered at once by MBR, transferring identifications from any one run to any of the others. To evaluate the error associated with these transfer events, we created a two-sample/two-proteome approach. In this way, samples containing no yeast lysate (n = 20) were assessed for false identification transfers from samples containing yeast (n = 20). While MBR increased the total number of spectral identifications by ∼40%, we also found that 44% of all identified yeast proteins had identifications transferred to at least one sample without yeast. However, of these only 2.7% remained in the final data set after applying the MaxQuant LFQ algorithm. We conclude that false transfers by MBR are plentiful, but few are retained in the final data set.

Practical Integration of Multi-Run iTRAQ Data

In this chapter, we describe some of the approaches we employ in the analysis of iTRAQ data in our group, with an emphasis on practical issues that can occur in larger multi-run projects. Our pipeline starts with a well-established iTRAQ workflow, makes use of protein level quantitation using ProteinPilot, and continues either via a global analysis in the presence of a common reference, or by identifying pairwise comparisons of interest and applying a method taking the protein ratios and protein ratio confidence measures into consideration. Additionally we describe what issues can occur in the more subtle scenarios involving composite databases in multi-run situations, and an approach applicable in that setting.

A Review on Quantitative Multiplexed Proteomics

Over the last few decades, mass spectrometry-based proteomics has become an increasingly powerful tool that is now able to routinely detect and quantify thousands of proteins. A major advance for global protein quantification was the introduction of isobaric tags, which, in a single experiment, enabled the global quantification of proteins across multiple samples. Herein, these methods are referred to as multiplexed proteomics. The principles, advantages, and drawbacks of various multiplexed proteomics techniques are discussed and compared with alternative approaches. We also discuss how the emerging combination of multiplexing with targeted proteomics might enable the reliable and high-quality quantification of very low abundance proteins across multiple conditions. Lastly, we suggest that fusing multiplexed proteomics with data-independent acquisition approaches might enable the comparison of hundreds of different samples without missing values, while maintaining the superb measurement precision and accuracy obtainable with isobaric tag quantification.

Multiplexed Relative Quantitation with Isobaric Tagging Mass Spectrometry Reveals Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex Ligand Dynamics in Response to Doxorubicin

MHC-I peptides are intracellular-cleaved peptides, usually 8-11 amino acids in length, which are presented on the cell surface and facilitate CD8⁺ T cell responses. Despite the appreciation of CD8⁺ T-cell antitumor immune responses toward improvement in patient outcomes, the MHC-I peptide ligands that facilitate the response are poorly described. Along these same lines, although many therapies have been recognized for their ability to reinvigorate antitumor CD8⁺ T-cell responses, whether these therapies alter the MHC-I peptide repertoire has not been fully assessed due to the lack of quantitative strategies. We develop a multiplexing platform for screening therapy-induced MHC-I ligands by employing tandem mass tags (TMTs). We applied this approach to measuring responses to doxorubicin, which is known to promote antitumor CD8⁺ T-cell responses during its therapeutic administration in cancer patients. Using both in vitro and in vivo systems, we show successful relative quantitation of MHC-I ligands using TMT-based multiplexing and demonstrate that doxorubicin induces MHC-I peptide ligands that are largely derived from mitotic progression and cell-cycle proteins. This high-throughput MHC-I ligand discovery approach may enable further explorations to understand how small molecules and other therapies alter MHC-I ligand presentation that may be harnessed for CD8⁺ T-cell-based immunotherapies.

TKO6: A Peptide Standard To Assess Interference for Unit-Resolved Isobaric Labeling Platforms

Protein abundance profiling using isobaric labeling is a well-established quantitative mass spectrometry technique. However, ratio distortion resulting from coisolated and cofragmented ions, commonly referred to as interference, remains a drawback of this strategy. Tribrid mass spectrometers, such as the Orbitrap Fusion and the Orbitrap Fusion Lumos with a triple mass analyzer configuration, facilitate methods (namely, SPS-MS3) that can help alleviate interference. However, few standards are available to measure interference and thereby aid in method development. Here we introduce the TKO6 standard that assesses ion interference and is designed specifically for data acquired at low (unit) mass resolution. We use TKO6 to compare interference in MS2- versus MS3-based quantitation methods, data acquisition methods of different lengths, and ion-trap-based tandem mass tag reporter ion analysis (IT-MS3) with conventional Orbitrap-based analysis (OT-MS3). We show that the TKO6 standard is a valuable tool for assessing quantification accuracy in isobaric-tag-based analyses.

Accurate, Sensitive, and Precise Multiplexed Proteomics Using the Complement Reporter Ion Cluster

Quantitative analysis of proteomes across multiple time points, organelles, and perturbations is essential for understanding both fundamental biology and disease states. The development of isobaric tags (e.g., TMT) has enabled the simultaneous measurement of peptide abundances across several different conditions. These multiplexed approaches are promising in principle because of advantages in throughput and measurement quality. However, in practice, existing multiplexing approaches suffer from key limitations. In its simple implementation (TMT-MS2), measurements are distorted by chemical noise leading to poor measurement accuracy. The current state-of-the-art (TMT-MS3) addresses this but requires specialized quadrupole-iontrap-Orbitrap instrumentation. The complement reporter ion approach (TMTc) produces high accuracy measurements and is compatible with many more instruments, like quadrupole-Orbitraps. However, the required deconvolution of the TMTc cluster leads to poor measurement precision. Here, we introduce TMTc+, which adds the modeling of the MS2-isolation step into the deconvolution algorithm. The resulting measurements are comparable in precision to TMT-MS3/MS2. The improved duty cycle and lower filtering requirements make TMTc+ more sensitive than TMT-MS3 and comparable with TMT-MS2. At the same time, unlike TMT-MS2, TMTc+ is exquisitely able to distinguish signal from chemical noise even outperforming TMT-MS3. Lastly, we compare TMTc+ to quantitative label-free proteomics of total HeLa lysate and find that TMTc+ quantifies 7.8k versus 3.9k proteins in a 5-plex sample. At the same time, the median coefficient of variation improves from 13% to 4%. Thus, TMTc+ advances quantitative proteomics by enabling accurate, sensitive, and precise multiplexed experiments on more commonly used instruments.

Quaternary ammonium isobaric tag for a relative and absolute quantification of peptides

Isobaric labeling quantification of peptides has become a method of choice for mass spectrometry-based proteomics studies. However, despite of wide variety of commercially available isobaric tags, none of the currently available methods offers significant improvement of sensitivity of detection during MS experiment. Recently, many strategies were applied to increase the ionization efficiency of peptides involving chemical modifications introducing quaternary ammonium fixed charge. Here, we present a novel quaternary ammonium-based isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification of peptides (QAS-iTRAQ 2-plex). Upon collisional activation, the new stable benzylic-type cationic reporter ion is liberated from the tag. Deuterium atoms were used to offset the differential masses of a reporter group. We tested the applicability of QAS-iTRAQ 2-plex reagent on a series of model peptides as well as bovine serum albumin tryptic digest. Obtained results suggest usefulness of this isobaric ionization tag for relative and absolute quantification of peptides.

Using hyperLOPIT to perform high-resolution mapping of the spatial proteome

The organization of eukaryotic cells into distinct subcompartments is vital for all functional processes, and aberrant protein localization is a hallmark of many diseases. Microscopy methods, although powerful, are usually low-throughput and dependent on the availability of fluorescent fusion proteins or highly specific and sensitive antibodies. One method that provides a global picture of the cell is localization of organelle proteins by isotope tagging (LOPIT), which combines biochemical cell fractionation using density gradient ultracentrifugation with multiplexed quantitative proteomics mass spectrometry, allowing simultaneous determination of the steady-state distribution of hundreds of proteins within organelles. Proteins are assigned to organelles based on the similarity of their gradient distribution to those of well-annotated organelle marker proteins. We have substantially re-developed our original LOPIT protocol (published by Nature Protocols in 2006) to enable the subcellular localization of thousands of proteins per experiment (hyperLOPIT), including spatial resolution at the suborganelle and large protein complex level. This Protocol Extension article integrates all elements of the hyperLOPIT pipeline, including an additional enrichment strategy for chromatin, extended multiplexing capacity of isobaric mass tags, state-of-the-art mass spectrometry methods and multivariate machine-learning approaches for analysis of spatial proteomics data. We have also created an open-source infrastructure to support analysis of quantitative mass-spectrometry-based spatial proteomics data (http://bioconductor.org/packages/pRoloc) and an accompanying interactive visualization framework (http://www. bioconductor.org/packages/pRolocGUI). The procedure we outline here is applicable to any cell culture system and requires ∼1 week to complete sample preparation steps, ∼2 d for mass spectrometry data acquisition and 1-2 d for data analysis and downstream informatics.

Enhanced Sample Multiplexing of Tissues Using Combined Precursor Isotopic Labeling and Isobaric Tagging (cPILOT)

There is an increasing demand to analyze many biological samples for disease understanding and biomarker discovery. Quantitative proteomics strategies that allow simultaneous measurement of multiple samples have become widespread and greatly reduce experimental costs and times. Our laboratory developed a technique called combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT), which enhances sample multiplexing of traditional isotopic labeling or isobaric tagging approaches. Global cPILOT can be applied to samples originating from cells, tissues, bodily fluids, or whole organisms and gives information on relative protein abundances across different sample conditions. cPILOT works by 1) using low pH buffer conditions to selectively dimethylate peptide N-termini and 2) using high pH buffer conditions to label primary amines of lysine residues with commercially-available isobaric reagents (see Table of Materials/Reagents). The degree of sample multiplexing available is dependent on the number of precursor labels used and the isobaric tagging reagent. Here, we present a 12-plex analysis using light and heavy dimethylation combined with six-plex isobaric reagents to analyze 12 samples from mouse tissues in a single analysis. Enhanced multiplexing is helpful for reducing experimental time and cost and more importantly, allowing comparison across many sample conditions (biological replicates, disease stage, drug treatments, genotypes, or longitudinal time-points) with less experimental bias and error. In this work, the global cPILOT approach is used to analyze brain, heart, and liver tissues across biological replicates from an Alzheimer's disease mouse model and wild-type controls. Global cPILOT can be applied to study other biological processes and adapted to increase sample multiplexing to greater than 20 samples.

A Strategy to Combine Sample Multiplexing with Targeted Proteomics Assays for High-Throughput Protein Signature Characterization

Targeted mass spectrometry assays for protein quantitation monitor peptide surrogates, which are easily multiplexed to target many peptides in a single assay. However, these assays have generally not taken advantage of sample multiplexing, which allows up to ten analyses to occur in parallel. We present a two-dimensional multiplexing workflow that utilizes synthetic peptides for each protein to prompt the simultaneous quantification of >100 peptides from up to ten mixed sample conditions. We demonstrate that targeted analysis of unfractionated lysates (2 hr) accurately reproduces the quantification of fractionated lysates (72 hr analysis) while obviating the need for peptide detection prior to quantification. We targeted 131 peptides corresponding to 69 proteins across all 60 National Cancer Institute cell lines in biological triplicate, analyzing 180 samples in only 48 hr (the equivalent of 16 min/sample). These data further elucidated a correlation between the expression of key proteins and their cellular response to drug treatment.

TMT One-Stop Shop: From Reliable Sample Preparation to Computational Analysis Platform

In this chapter we describe the workflow we use for labeled quantitative proteomics analysis using tandem mass tags (TMT) starting with the sample preparation and ending with the multivariate analysis of the resulting data. We detail the step-by-step process from sample processing, labeling, fractionation, and data processing using Proteome Discoverer through to data analysis and interpretation in the context of a multi-run experiment. The final analysis and data interpretation rely on an R package we call TMTPrepPro, which are deployed on a local GenePattern server, and used for generating various outputs which are also outlined herein.

On the Statistical Significance of Compressed Ratios in Isobaric Labeling: A Cross-Platform Comparison

Isobaric labeling is gaining popularity in proteomics due to its multiplexing capacity. However, copeptide fragmentation introduces a bias that undermines its accuracy. Several strategies have been shown to partially and, in some cases, completely solve this issue. However, it is still not clear how ratio compression affects the ability to identify a protein's change of abundance as statistically significant. Here, by using the "two proteomes" approach (E. coli lysates with fixed 2.5 ratios in the presence or absence of human lysates acting as the background interference) and manipulating isolation width values, we were able to model isobaric data with different levels of accuracy and precision in three types of mass spectrometers: LTQ Orbitrap Velos, Impact, and Q Exactive. We determined the influence of these variables on the statistical significance of the distorted ratios and compared them to the ratios measured without impurities. Our results confirm previous findings1-4 regarding the importance of optimizing acquisition parameters in each instrument in order to minimize interference without compromising precision and identification. We also show that, under these experimental conditions, the inclusion of a second replicate increases statistical sensitivity 2-3-fold and counterbalances to a large extent the issue of ratio compression.

A Biologist's Field Guide to Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics

High-throughput genomic and proteomic studies have generated near-comprehensive catalogs of biological constituents within many model systems. Nevertheless, static catalogs are often insufficient to fully describe the dynamic processes that drive biology. Quantitative proteomic techniques address this need by providing insight into closely related biological states such as the stages of a therapeutic response or cellular differentiation. The maturation of quantitative proteomics in recent years has brought about a variety of technologies, each with their own strengths and weaknesses. It can be difficult for those unfamiliar with this evolving landscape to match the experiment at hand with the best tool for the job. Here, we outline quantitative methods for proteomic mass spectrometry and discuss their benefits and weaknesses from the perspective of the biologist aiming to generate meaningful data and address mechanistic questions.