Bilayer-Coated Nanoparticles Reveal How Influenza Viral Entry Depends on Membrane Deformability but Not Curvature

Viral Membrane Fusion: A Dance Between Proteins and Lipids

There are at least 21 families of enveloped viruses that infect mammals, and many contain members of high concern for global human health. All enveloped viruses have a dedicated fusion protein or fusion complex that enacts the critical genome-releasing membrane fusion event that is essential before viral replication within the host cell interior can begin. Because all enveloped viruses enter cells by fusion, it behooves us to know how viral fusion proteins function. Viral fusion proteins are also major targets of neutralizing antibodies, and hence they serve as key vaccine immunogens. Here we review current concepts about viral membrane fusion proteins focusing on how they are triggered, structural intermediates between pre- and postfusion forms, and their interplay with the lipid bilayers they engage. We also discuss cellular and therapeutic interventions that thwart virus-cell membrane fusion.

The ACE2 receptor accelerates but is not biochemically required for SARS-CoV-2 membrane fusion

The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus infects human cells via the ACE2 receptor. Structural evidence suggests that ACE2 may not just serve as an attachment factor but also conformationally activate the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for membrane fusion. Here, we test that hypothesis directly, using DNA-lipid tethering as a synthetic attachment factor in place of ACE2. We find that SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus and virus-like particles are capable of membrane fusion without ACE2 if activated with an appropriate protease. Thus, ACE2 is not biochemically required for SARS-CoV-2 membrane fusion. However, addition of soluble ACE2 speeds up the fusion reaction. On a per-spike level, ACE2 appears to promote activation for fusion and then subsequent inactivation if an appropriate protease is not present. Kinetic analysis suggests at least two rate-limiting steps for SARS-CoV-2 membrane fusion, one of which is ACE2 dependent and one of which is not. Since ACE2 serves as a high-affinity attachment factor on human cells, the possibility to replace it with other factors implies a flatter fitness landscape for host adaptation by SARS-CoV-2 and future related coronaviruses.

Single-Virus Fusion Measurements Reveal Multiple Mechanistically Equivalent Pathways for SARS-CoV-2 Entry

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) binds to cell surface receptors and is activated for membrane fusion and cell entry via proteolytic cleavage. Phenomenological data have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can be activated for entry at either the cell surface or in endosomes, but the relative roles in different cell types and mechanisms of entry have been debated. Here, we used single-virus fusion experiments and exogenously controlled proteases to probe activation directly. We found that plasma membrane and an appropriate protease are sufficient to support SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus fusion. Furthermore, fusion kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses are indistinguishable no matter which of a broad range of proteases is used to activate the virus. This suggests that the fusion mechanism is insensitive to protease identity or even whether activation occurs before or after receptor binding. These data support a model for opportunistic fusion by SARS-CoV-2 in which the subcellular location of entry likely depends on the differential activity of airway, cellsurface, and endosomal proteases, but all support infection. Inhibition of any single host protease may thus reduce infection in some cells but may be less clinically robust. IMPORTANCE SARS-CoV-2 can use multiple pathways to infect cells, as demonstrated recently when new viral variants switched dominant infection pathways. Here, we used single-virus fusion experiments together with biochemical reconstitution to show that these multiple pathways coexist simultaneously and specifically that the virus can be activated by different proteases in different cellular compartments with mechanistically identical effects. The consequences of this are that the virus is evolutionarily plastic and that therapies targeting viral entry should address multiple pathways at once to achieve optimal clinical effects.

Measuring single-virus fusion kinetics using an assay for nucleic acid exposure

The kinetics by which individual enveloped viruses fuse with membranes provide an important window into viral-entry mechanisms. We have developed a real-time assay using fluorescent probes for single-virus genome exposure than can report on stages of viral entry including or subsequent to fusion pore formation and prior to viral genome trafficking. We accomplish this using oxazole yellow nucleic-acid-binding dyes, which can be encapsulated in the lumen of target membranes to permit specific detection of fusion events. Since increased fluorescence of the dye occurs only when it encounters viral genome via a fusion pore and binds, this assay excludes content leakage without fusion. Using this assay, we show that influenza virus fuses with liposomes of different sizes with indistinguishable kinetics by both testing liposomes extruded through pores of different radii and showing that the fusion kinetics of individual liposomes are uncorrelated with the size of the liposome. These results suggest that the starting curvature of such liposomes does not control the rate-limiting steps in influenza entry.

Recent Developments in Single-Virus Fusion Assay

Viral infection is a global health hazard. A crucial step in the infection cycle of enveloped viruses is the fusion of viral and host cellular membranes, which permits the transfer of the viral genome to the host cells. Membrane fusion is a ubiquitous process involved in sperm-egg fusion, exocytosis, vesicular trafficking, and viral entry to host cells. While different protein machineries catalyze the diverse fusion processes, the essential step, i.e., merging of two lipid bilayers against a kinetic energy barrier, is the same. Therefore, viral fusion machineries/pathways are not only the sites for antiviral drug development but also serve as model fusogens. Ensemble-based spectroscopic approaches or bulk fusion assays have yielded valuable insights regarding the fusion processes. However, due to the stochastic nature of the fusion events, ensemble-based assays do not permit synchronization of all the fusion events, and the molecular steps leading to fusion pore opening cannot be resolved entirely and correlated with the structural changes in viral fusion proteins. Several single-virus fusion assays have been developed to circumvent these issues. The review describes the recent advancements in single-virus/particle fusion assays using the Influenza virus as a paradigm.

Membrane attachment and fusion of HIV-1, influenza A, and SARS-CoV-2: resolving the mechanisms with biophysical methods

Attachment to and fusion with cell membranes are two major steps in the replication cycle of many human viruses. We focus on these steps for three enveloped viruses, i.e., HIV-1, IAVs, and SARS-CoV-2. Viral spike proteins drive the membrane attachment and fusion of these viruses. Dynamic interactions between the spike proteins and membrane receptors trigger their specific attachment to the plasma membrane of host cells. A single virion on cell membranes can engage in binding with multiple receptors of the same or different types. Such dynamic and multivalent binding of these viruses result in an optimal attachment strength which in turn leads to their cellular entry and membrane fusion. The latter process is driven by conformational changes of the spike proteins which are also class I fusion proteins, providing the energetics of membrane tethering, bending, and fusion. These viruses exploit cellular and membrane factors in regulating the conformation changes and membrane processes. Herein, we describe the major structural and functional features of spike proteins of the enveloped viruses including highlights on their structural dynamics. The review delves into some of the case studies in the literature discussing the findings on multivalent binding, membrane hemifusion, and fusion of these viruses. The focus is on applications of biophysical tools with an emphasis on single-particle methods for evaluating mechanisms of these processes at the molecular and cellular levels.

Single-virus assay reveals membrane determinants and mechanistic features of Sendai virus binding

Sendai virus (SeV, formally murine respirovirus) is a membrane-enveloped, negative-sense RNA virus in the Paramyxoviridae family and is closely related to human parainfluenza viruses. SeV has long been utilized as a model paramyxovirus and has recently gained attention as a viral vector candidate for both laboratory and clinical applications. To infect host cells, SeV must first bind to sialic acid glycolipid or glycoprotein receptors on the host cell surface via its hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein. Receptor binding induces a conformational change in HN, which allosterically triggers the viral fusion (F) protein to catalyze membrane fusion. While it is known that SeV binds to α2,3-linked sialic acid receptors, and there has been some study into the chemical requirements of those receptors, key mechanistic features of SeV binding remain unknown, in part because traditional approaches often convolve binding and fusion. Here, we develop and employ a fluorescence microscopy-based assay to observe SeV binding to supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) at the single-particle level, which easily disentangles binding from fusion. Using this assay, we investigate mechanistic questions of SeV binding. We identify chemical structural features of ganglioside receptors that influence viral binding and demonstrate that binding is cooperative with respect to receptor density. We measure the characteristic decay time of unbinding and provide evidence supporting a "rolling" mechanism of viral mobility following receptor binding. We also study the dependence of binding on target cholesterol concentration. Interestingly, we find that although SeV binding shows striking parallels in cooperative binding with a prior report of Influenza A virus, it does not demonstrate a similar sensitivity to cholesterol concentration and receptor nanocluster formation.

Chemistry of Lipid Nanoparticles for RNA Delivery

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a type of lipid vesicles that possess a homogeneous lipid core. These vesicles are widely used in small-molecule drug and nucleic acid delivery and recently gained much attention because of their remarkable success as a delivery platform for COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Nonetheless, the utility of transient protein expression induced by mRNA extends far beyond vaccines against infectious diseases─they also hold promise as cancer vaccines, protein replacement therapies, and gene editing components for rare genetic diseases. However, naked mRNA is inherently unstable and prone to rapid degradation by nucleases and self-hydrolysis. Encapsulation of mRNA within LNPs protects mRNA from extracellular ribonucleases and assists with intracellular mRNA delivery.In this Account, we discuss the core features of LNPs for RNA delivery. We focus our attention on LNPs designed to deliver mRNA; however, we also include examples of siRNA-LNP delivery where appropriate to highlight the commonalities and the dissimilarities due to the nucleic acid structure. First, we introduce the concept of LNPs, the advantages and disadvantages of utilizing nucleic acids as therapeutic agents, and the general reasoning behind the molecular makeup of LNPs. We also briefly highlight the most recent clinical successes of LNP-based nucleic acid therapies. Second, we describe the theory and methods of LNP self-assembly. The common idea behind all of the preparation methods is inducing electrostatic interactions between the nucleic acid and charged lipids and promoting nanoparticle growth via hydrophobic interactions. Third, we break down the LNP composition with special attention to the fundamental properties and purposes of each component. This includes the identified molecular design criteria, commercial sourcing, impact on intracellular trafficking, and contribution to the properties of LNPs. One of the key components of LNPs is ionizable lipids, which initiate electrostatic binding with endosomal membranes and facilitate cytosolic release; however, the roles of other lipid components should not be disregarded, as they are associated with stability, clearance, and distribution of LNPs. Fourth, we review the attributes of LNP constructs as a whole that can heavily influence RNA delivery. These attributes are LNP size, charge, internal structure, lipid packing, lipid membrane hydration, stability, and affinity toward biomacromolecules. We also discuss the specific techniques used to examine these attributes and how they can be adjusted. Finally, we offer our perspective on the future of RNA therapies and some questions that remain in the realm of LNP formulation and optimization.

Self-assembled mRNA vaccines

mRNA vaccines have evolved from being a mere curiosity to emerging as COVID-19 vaccine front-runners. Recent advancements in the field of RNA technology, vaccinology, and nanotechnology have generated interest in delivering safe and effective mRNA therapeutics. In this review, we discuss design and self-assembly of mRNA vaccines. Self-assembly, a spontaneous organization of individual molecules, allows for design of nanoparticles with customizable properties. We highlight the materials commonly utilized to deliver mRNA, their physicochemical characteristics, and other relevant considerations, such as mRNA optimization, routes of administration, cellular fate, and immune activation, that are important for successful mRNA vaccination. We also examine the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines currently in clinical trials. mRNA vaccines are ready for the clinic, showing tremendous promise in the COVID-19 vaccine race, and have pushed the boundaries of gene therapy.

Precise Triggering and Chemical Control of Single-Virus Fusion within Endosomes

Many enveloped viruses infect cells within endocytic compartments. The pH drop that accompanies endosomal maturation, often in conjunction with proteolysis, triggers viral proteins to insert into the endosomal membrane and drive fusion. Fusion dynamics have been studied by tracking viruses within living cells, which limits the precision with which fusion can be synchronized and controlled, and reconstituting viral fusion to synthetic membranes, which introduces nonphysiological membrane curvature and composition. To overcome these limitations, we report chemically controllable triggering of single-virus fusion within endosomes. We isolated influenza (A/Aichi/68; H3N2) virus:endosome conjugates from cells, immobilized them in a microfluidic flow cell, and rapidly and controllably triggered fusion. Observed lipid-mixing kinetics were surprisingly similar to those of influenza virus fusion with model membranes of opposite curvature: 80% of single-virus events had indistinguishable kinetics. This result suggests that endosomal membrane curvature is not a key permissive feature for viral entry, at least lipid mixing. The assay preserved endosomal membrane asymmetry and protein composition, providing a platform to test how cellular restriction factors and altered endosomal trafficking affect viral membrane fusion.IMPORTANCE Many enveloped viruses infect cells via fusion to endosomes, but controlling this process within living cells has been challenging. We studied the fusion of influenza virus virions to endosomes in a chemically controllable manner. Extracting virus:endosome conjugates from cells and exogenously triggering fusion permits precise study of virus:endosome fusion kinetics. Surprisingly, endosomal curvature does not grossly alter fusion kinetics, although membrane deformability does. This supports a model for influenza virus entry where cells restrict or permit membrane fusion by changing deformability, for instance, using interferon-induced proteins.