Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB)

Transcendent Aspects of Proton Channels

A handful of biological proton-selective ion channels exist. Some open at positive or negative membrane potentials, others open at low or high pH, and some are light activated. This review focuses on common features that result from the unique properties of protons. Proton conduction through water or proteins differs qualitatively from that of all other ions. Extraordinary proton selectivity is needed to ensure that protons permeate and other ions do not. Proton selectivity arises from a proton pathway comprising a hydrogen-bonded chain that typically includes at least one titratable amino acid side chain. The enormously diverse functions of proton channels in disparate regions of the phylogenetic tree can be summarized by considering the chemical and electrical consequences of proton flux across membranes. This review discusses examples of cells in which proton efflux serves to increase pHi, decrease pHo, control the membrane potential, generate action potentials, or compensate transmembrane movement of electrical charge.

Functional Water Networks in Fully Hydrated Photosystem II

Water channels and networks within photosystem II (PSII) of oxygenic photosynthesis are critical for enzyme structure and function. They control substrate delivery to the oxygen-evolving center and mediate proton transfer at both the oxidative and reductive endpoints. Current views on PSII hydration are derived from protein crystallography, but structural information may be compromised by sample dehydration and technical limitations. Here, we simulate the physiological hydration structure of a cyanobacterial PSII model following a thorough hydration procedure and large-scale unconstrained all-atom molecular dynamics enabled by massively parallel simulations. We show that crystallographic models of PSII are moderately to severely dehydrated and that this problem is particularly acute for models derived from X-ray free electron laser (XFEL) serial femtosecond crystallography. We present a fully hydrated representation of cyanobacterial PSII and map all water channels, both static and dynamic, associated with the electron donor and acceptor sides. Among them, we describe a series of transient channels and the attendant conformational gating role of protein components. On the acceptor side, we characterize a channel system that is absent from existing crystallographic models but is likely functionally important for the reduction of the terminal electron acceptor plastoquinone Q_B. The results of the present work build a foundation for properly (re)evaluating crystallographic models and for eliciting new insights into PSII structure and function.

Comparison of proton transfer paths to the QA and QB sites of the Rb. sphaeroides photosynthetic reaction centers

The photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers from purple non-sulfur bacteria use light energy to drive the transfer of electrons from cytochrome c to ubiquinone. Ubiquinone bound in the Q_A site cycles between quinone, Q_A, and anionic semiquinone, Q_A^·-, being reduced once and never binding protons. In the Q_B site, ubiquinone is reduced twice by Q_A^·-, binds two protons and is released into the membrane as the quinol, QH₂. The network of hydrogen bonds formed in a molecular dynamics trajectory was drawn to investigate proton transfer pathways from the cytoplasm to each quinone binding site. Q_A is isolated with no path for protons to enter from the surface. In contrast, there is a complex and tangled network requiring residues and waters that can bring protons to Q_B. There are three entries from clusters of surface residues centered around HisH126, GluH224, and HisH68. The network is in good agreement with earlier studies, Mutation of key nodes in the network, such as SerL223, were previously shown to slow proton delivery. Mutational studies had also shown that double mutations of residues such as AspM17 and AspL210 along multiple paths in the network presented here slow the reaction, while single mutations do not. Likewise, mutation of both HisH126 and HisH128, which are at the entry to two paths reduce the rate of proton uptake.

Mechanism of the formation of proton transfer pathways in photosynthetic reaction centers

The crystal structures of photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs) and photosystem II show large structural similarity. However, the proposed mechanisms of proton transfer toward the terminal electron acceptor quinone (Q_B) are not consistent. In particular, not His-L190, which is an H-bond partner of Q_B, but rather Glu-L212, which is ∼6 Å away from Q_B, was assumed to be the direct proton donor for Q_B. We demonstrate that the H-bond between His-L190 and Q_B is a low-barrier H-bond, which facilitates proton transfer from singly protonated His-L190 to Q_B. Furthermore, Glu-L212 is not a direct H-bond donor for Q_B. However, it facilitates proton transfer toward deprotonated His-L190 via water molecules after Q_BH₂ forms and leaves the PbRC.

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the secondary quinone Q_B accepts two electrons and two protons via electron-coupled proton transfer (PT). Here, we identify PT pathways that proceed toward the Q_B binding site, using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. As the first electron is transferred to Q_B, the formation of the Grotthuss-like pre-PT H-bond network is observed along Asp-L213, Ser-L223, and the distal Q_B carbonyl O site. As the second electron is transferred, the formation of a low-barrier H-bond is observed between His-L190 at Fe and the proximal Q_B carbonyl O site, which facilitates the second PT. As Q_BH₂ leaves PbRC, a chain of water molecules connects protonated Glu-L212 and deprotonated His-L190 forms, which serves as a pathway for the His-L190 reprotonation. The findings of the second pathway, which does not involve Glu-L212, and the third pathway, which proceeds from Glu-L212 to His-L190, provide a mechanism for PT commonly used among PbRCs.

Thermodynamic View of Proton Activated Electron Transfer in the Reaction Center of Photosynthetic Bacteria

The temperature dependence of the sequential coupling of proton transfer to the second interquinone electron transfer is studied in the reaction center proteins of photosynthetic bacteria modified by different mutations and treatment by divalent cations. The Eyring plots of kinetics were evaluated by the Marcus theory of electron and proton transfer. In mutants of electron transfer limitation (including the wild type), the observed thermodynamic parameters had to be corrected for those of the fast proton pre-equilibrium. The electron transfer is nonadiabatic with transmission coefficient 6 × 10^-4, and the reorganization energy amounts to 1.2 eV. If the proton transfer is the rate limiting step, the reorganization energy and the works terms fall in the range of 200-500 meV, depending on the site of damage in the proton transfer chain. The product term is 100-150 meV larger than the reactant term. While the electron transfer mutants have a low free energy of activation (∼200 meV), the proton transfer variants show significantly elevated levels of the free energy barrier (∼500 meV). The second electron transfer in the bacterial reaction center can serve as a model system of coupled electron and proton transfer in other proteins or ion channels.

Time-resolved infrared spectroscopy in the study of photosynthetic systems

Time-resolved (TR) infrared (IR) spectroscopy in the nanosecond to second timescale has been extensively used, in the last 30 years, in the study of photosynthetic systems. Interesting results have also been obtained at lower time resolution (minutes or even hours). In this review, we first describe the used techniques-dispersive IR, laser diode IR, rapid-scan Fourier transform (FT)IR, step-scan FTIR-underlying the advantages and disadvantages of each of them. Then, the main TR-IR results obtained so far in the investigation of photosynthetic reactions (in reaction centers, in light-harvesting systems, but also in entire membranes or even in living organisms) are presented. Finally, after the general conclusions, the perspectives in the field of TR-IR applied to photosynthesis are described.

Gate-controlled proton diffusion and protonation-induced ratchet motion in the stator of the bacterial flagellar motor

The proton permeation process of the stator complex MotA/B in the flagellar motor of Escherichia coli was investigated. The atomic model structure of the transmembrane part of MotA/B was constructed based on the previously published disulfide cross-linking and tryptophan scanning mutations. The dynamic permeation of hydronium/sodium ions and water molecule through the channel formed in MotA/B was observed using a steered molecular dynamics simulation. During the simulation, Leu46 of MotB acts as the gate for hydronium ion permeation, which induced the formation of water wire that may mediate the proton transfer to Asp32 on MotB. Free energy profiles for permeation were calculated by umbrella sampling. The free energy barrier for H3O(+) permeation was consistent with the proton transfer rate deduced from the flagellar rotational speed and number of protons per rotation, which suggests that the gating is the rate-limiting step. Structure and dynamics of the MotA/B with nonprotonated and protonated Asp32, Val43Met, and Val43Leu mutants in MotB were investigated using molecular dynamics simulation. A narrowing of the channel was observed in the mutants, which is consistent with the size-dependent ion selectivity. In MotA/B with the nonprotonated Asp32, the A3 segment in MotA maintained a kink whereas the protonation induced a straighter shape. Assuming that the cytoplasmic domain not included in the atomic model moves as a rigid body, the protonation/deprotonation of Asp32 is inferred to induce a ratchet motion of the cytoplasmic domain, which may be correlated to the motion of the flagellar rotor.

Philosophy of voltage-gated proton channels

In this review, voltage-gated proton channels are considered from a mainly teleological perspective. Why do proton channels exist? What good are they? Why did they go to such lengths to develop several unique hallmark properties such as extreme selectivity and ΔpH-dependent gating? Why is their current so minuscule? How do they manage to be so selective? What is the basis for our belief that they conduct H(+) and not OH(-)? Why do they exist in many species as dimers when the monomeric form seems to work quite well? It is hoped that pondering these questions will provide an introduction to these channels and a way to logically organize their peculiar properties as well as to understand how they are able to carry out some of their better-established biological functions.

Electron transfer from cytochrome c(2) to the reaction center: a transition state model for ionic strength effects due to neutral mutations

Interprotein electron transfer plays an important role in biological energy conversion. In this work, the electron transfer reaction between cytochrome c(2) (cyt) and the reaction center (RC) was studied to determine the mechanisms coupling association and electron transfer. Previous studies have shown that mutation of hydrophobic residues in the reaction interface, particularly Tyr L162, changes the binding affinity and rates of electron transfer at low ionic strengths. In this study, the effect of ionic strength on the second-order electron transfer rate constant, k(2), between cyt c(2) and native or mutant RCs was examined. Mutations of hydrophobic and hydrogen bonding residues caused k(2) to decrease more rapidly with an increase in ionic strength. This change is explained with a transition state model by a switch from a diffusion-limited reaction in native RCs, where electron transfer occurs upon each binding event, to a fast exchange reaction in the Tyr L162 mutant, where dissociation occurs before electron transfer and k(2) depends upon the equilibrium between bound and free protein complexes. The difference in ionic strength dependence is attributed to a smaller effect of ionic strength on the energy of the transition state compared to the bound state due to larger distances between charged residues in the transition state. This model explains the faster dissociation rate at higher ionic strengths that may assist rapid turnover that is important for biological function. These results provide a quantitative model for coupling protein association with electron transfer and elucidate the role of short-range interactions in determining the rate of electron transfer.

Identification of FTIR bands due to internal water molecules around the quinone binding sites in the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The bacterial reaction center (RC) is a membrane protein complex that performs photosynthetic electron transfer from a bacteriochlorophyll dimer to quinone acceptors Q(A) and Q(B). Q(B) accepts electrons from the primary quinone, Q(A), in two sequential electron transfer reactions coupled to uptake of a proton from solution. It has been suggested that water molecules along the proton uptake pathway are protonated upon quinone reduction on the basis of FTIR difference spectra [Breton, J., and Nabedryk, E. (1998) Photosynth. Res. 55, 301-307]. We examined the possible involvement of water molecules in the photoreaction processes by studying (18)O water isotope effects on FTIR difference spectra resulting from formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-). Continuum bands in D(2)O due to Q(B)(-) formation in the 2300-1800 cm(-1) region did not show spectral shifts by (18)O water in the wild-type (WT) RC, suggesting that these bands do not originate from (protonated) water. In contrast, the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum of the EQ-L212 mutant RC showed a spectral shift of a band near 2100 cm(-1) due to (18)O water substitution, consistent with protonation of internal water. FTIR shifts due to (18)O water were also observed following formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) in the spectral region of 3700-3500 cm(-1) characteristic of weakly hydrogen bonded water. The water responsible for the Q(B)(-) change was localized near Glu-L212 by spectral shifts in mutant RCs. The weakly hydrogen bonded water perturbed by quinone reduction may play a role in stabilizing the charge-separated state.

Interaction between cytochrome c2 and the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: role of interprotein hydrogen bonds in binding and electron transfer

The role of short-range hydrogen bond interactions at the interface between electron transfer proteins cytochrome c(2) (cyt) and the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was studied by mutation (to Ala) of RC residues Asn M187, Asn M188, and Gln L258 which form interprotein hydrogen bonds to cyt in the cyt-RC complex. The largest decrease in binding constant K(A) (8-fold) for a single mutation was observed for Asn M187, which forms an intraprotein hydrogen bond to the key residue Tyr L162 in the center of the contact region with a low solvent accessibility. Interaction between Asn M187 and Tyr L162 was also implicated in binding by double mutation of the two residues. The hydrogen bond mutations did not significantly change the second-order rate constant, k(2), indicating the mutations did not change the association rate for formation of the cyt-RC complex but increased the dissociation rate. The first-order electron transfer rate, k(e), for the cyt-RC complex was reduced by a factor of up to 4 (for Asn M187). The changes in k(e) were correlated with the changes in binding affinity but were not accompanied by increases in activation energy. We conclude that short-range hydrogen bond interactions contribute to the close packing of residues in the central contact region between the cyt and RC near Asn M187 and Tyr L162. The close packing contributes to fast electron transfer by increasing the rate of electronic coupling and contributes to the binding energy holding the cyt in position for times sufficient for electron transfer to occur.

Investigating the mechanisms of photosynthetic proteins using continuum electrostatics

Computational methods based on continuum electrostatics are widely used in theoretical biochemistry to analyze the function of proteins. Continuum electrostatic methods in combination with quantum chemical and molecular mechanical methods can help to analyze even very complex biochemical systems. In this article, applications of these methods to proteins involved in photosynthesis are reviewed. After giving a short introduction to the basic concepts of the continuum electrostatic model based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, we describe the application of this approach to the docking of electron transfer proteins, to the comparison of isofunctional proteins, to the tuning of absorption spectra, to the analysis of the coupling of electron and proton transfer, to the analysis of the effect of membrane potentials on the energetics of membrane proteins, and to the kinetics of charge transfer reactions. Simulations as those reviewed in this article help to analyze molecular mechanisms on the basis of the structure of the protein, guide new experiments, and provide a better and deeper understanding of protein functions.

Turnover of ubiquinone-0 at the acceptor side of photosynthetic reaction center

The steady-state operation of photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by measuring the rate of cytochrome photo-oxidation under intensive continuous illumination (808 nm, 5 W cm(-2)). The native quinone UQ10 in Q(B) binding site of the reaction center was substituted by tailless UQ0 and the binding parameters and the turnover rate of the UQ0 was studied to test the recently discovered light-intensity dependent acceptor side effect (Gerencsér and Maróti 2006). The binding parameters of UQ0 (k(on) = 2.1 x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) and k(off) = 100 s(-1)) were characteristic to the RC exposed to high light-intensity. The dissociation constant (K (D) = 480 microM) determined under high light intensity is 2-3 times larger than that determined from flash-experiments. The light-intensity dependent acceleration of cytochrome turnover measured on reaction center of inhibited proton binding was independent of the type of the quinone and was sensitive only to the size ("pressure") of the quinone pool. The dissociation constants of different types of semiquinones show similarly high (several orders of magnitude) increase in the modified conformation of the Q(B) binding pocket due to high intensity of illumination. This result indicates the exclusive role of the quinone headgroup in the binding of semiquinone to different conformations of the protein.

Energy transduction: proton transfer through the respiratory complexes

A series of metalloprotein complexes embedded in a mitochondrial or bacterial membrane utilize electron transfer reactions to pump protons across the membrane and create an electrochemical potential (DeltamuH+). Current understanding of the principles of electron-driven proton transfer is discussed, mainly with respect to the wealth of knowledge available from studies of cytochrome c oxidase. Structural, experimental, and theoretical evidence supports the model of long-distance proton transfer via hydrogen-bonded water chains in proteins as well as the basic concept that proton uptake and release in a redox-driven pump are driven by charge changes at the membrane-embedded centers. Key elements in the pumping mechanism may include bound water, carboxylates, and the heme propionates, arginines, and associated water above the hemes. There is evidence for an important role of subunit III and proton backflow, but the number and nature of gating mechanisms remain elusive, as does the mechanism of physiological control of efficiency.

Chance and design—Proton transfer in water, channels and bioenergetic proteins

Proton transfer and transport in water, gramicidin and some selected channels and bioenergetic proteins are reviewed. An attempt is made to draw some conclusions about how Nature designs long distance, proton transport functionality. The prevalence of water rather than amino acid hydrogen bonded chains is noted, and the possible benefits of waters as the major component are discussed qualitatively.

The mechanism of proton transfer between adjacent sites on the molecular surface

The surface of a protein, or a membrane, is spotted with a multitude of proton binding sites, some of which are only few A apart. When a proton is released from one site, it propagates through the water by a random walk under the bias of the local electrostatic potential determined by the distribution of the charges on the protein. Eventually, the released protons are dispersed in the bulk, but during the first few nanoseconds after the dissociation, the protons can be trapped by encounter with nearby acceptor sites. While the study of this reaction on the surface of a protein suffers from experimental and theoretical difficulties, it can be investigated with simple model compounds like derivatives of fluorescein. In the present study, we evaluate the mechanism of proton transfer reactions that proceed, preferentially, inside the Coulomb cage of the dye molecules. Kinetic analysis of the measured dynamics reveals the role of the dimension of the Coulomb cage on the efficiency of the reaction and how the ordering of the water molecules by the dye affects the kinetic isotope effect.

Small weak acids reactivate proton transfer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides mutated at AspL210 and AspM17

In reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, site-directed mutagenesis has implicated several acidic residues in the delivery of protons to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) during reduction to quinol. In a double mutant (Asp(L210) --> Asn + Asp(M17) --> Asn) that is severely impaired in proton transfer capability over a wide pH range, proton transfer was "rescued" by added weak acids. For low pK(a) acids the total concentration of salt required near neutral pH was high. The ionic strength effect of added salts stimulated the rate of proton-coupled electron transfer at pH < 7, but decreased it at pH > 7.5, indicating an effective isoelectric point between these limits. In this region, a substantial rate enhancement by weak acids was clearly evident. A Brønsted plot of activity versus pK(a) of the rescuing acids was linear, with a slope of -1, and extrapolated to a diffusion-limited rate at pK(a)(app) approximately 1. However, the maximum rate at saturating concentrations of acid did not correlate with pK(a), indicating that the acid and anion species compete for binding, both with weak affinity. This model predicts that pK(a)(app) corresponds to a true pK(a) = 4-5, similar to that for a carboxylic acid or Q(B)(-), itself. Only rather small, neutral acids were active, indicating a need to access a small internal volume, suggested to be a proton channel to the Q(B) domain. However, the on-rates were near the diffusion limit. The implications for intraprotein proton transfer pathway design are discussed.

Interactions between cytochrome c2 and the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: the cation-pi interaction

The cation-pi interaction between positively charged and aromatic groups is a common feature of many proteins and protein complexes. The structure of the complex between cytochrome c(2) (cyt c(2)) and the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides exhibits a cation-pi complex formed between Arg-C32 on cyt c(2) and Tyr-M295 on the RC [Axelrod, H. L., et al. (2002) J. Mol. Biol. 319, 501-515]. The importance of the cation-pi interaction for binding and electron transfer was studied by mutating Tyr-M295 and Arg-C32. The first- and second-order rates for electron transfer were not affected by mutating Tyr-M295 to Ala, indicating that the cation-pi complex does not greatly affect the association process or structure of the state active in electron transfer. The dissociation constant K(D) showed a greater increase when Try-M295 was replaced with nonaromatic Ala (3-fold) as opposed to aromatic Phe (1.2-fold), which is characteristic of a cation-pi interaction. Replacement of Arg-C32 with Ala increased K(D) (80-fold) largely due to removal of electrostatic interactions with negatively charged residues on the RC. Replacement with Lys increased K(D) (6-fold), indicating that Lys does not form a cation-pi complex. This specificity for Arg may be due to a solvation effect. Double mutant analysis indicates an interaction energy between Tyr-M295 and Arg-C32 of approximately -24 meV (-0.6 kcal/mol). This energy is surprisingly small considering the widespread occurrence of cation-pi complexes and may be due to the tradeoff between the favorable cation-pi binding energy and the unfavorable desolvation energy needed to bury Arg-C32 in the short-range contact region between the two proteins.

Energetics of Proton Transfer Pathways in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.

Surface-mediated proton-transfer reactions in membrane-bound proteins

As outlined by Peter Mitchell in the chemiosmotic theory, an intermediate in energy conversion in biological systems is a proton electrochemical potential difference ("proton gradient") across a membrane, generated by membrane-bound protein complexes. These protein complexes accommodate proton-transfer pathways through which protons are conducted. In this review, we focus specifically on the role of the protein-membrane surface and the surface-bulk water interface in the dynamics of proton delivery to these proton-transfer pathways. The general mechanisms are illustrated by experimental results from studies of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres (RCs) and cytochrome c oxidase (CcO).

X-Ray Structure Determination of Three Mutants of the Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rb. sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the reduction of a bound quinone molecule Q(B) is coupled with proton uptake. When Asp-L213 is replaced by Asn, proton transfer is inhibited. Proton transfer was restored by two second-site revertant mutations, Arg-M233-->Cys and Arg-H177-->His. Kinetic effects of Cd(2+) on proton transfer showed that the entry point in revertant RCs to be the same as in the native RC. The structures of the parental and two revertant RCs were determined at resolutions of 2.10, 1.80, and 2.75 A. From the structures, we were able to delineate alternate proton transfer pathways in the revertants. The main changes occur near Glu-H173, which allow it to substitute for the missing Asp-L213. The electrostatic changes near Glu-H173 cause it to be a good proton donor and acceptor, and the structural changes create a cavity which accommodates water molecules that connect Glu-H173 to other proton transfer components.

Proton transfer pathways and mechanism in bacterial reaction centers

The focus of this minireview is to discuss the state of knowledge of the pathways and rates of proton transfer in the bacterial reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Protons involved in the light driven catalytic reduction of a quinone molecule QB to quinol QBH2 travel from the aqueous solution through well defined proton transfer pathways to the oxygen atoms of the quinone. Three main topics are discussed: (1) the pathways for proton transfer involving the residues: His-H126, His-H128, Asp-L210, Asp-M17, Asp-L213, Ser-L223 and Glu-L212, which were determined by a variety of methods including the use of proton uptake inhibiting metal ions (e.g. Zn2+ and Cd2+); (2) the rate constants for proton transfer, obtained from a 'chemical rescue' study was determined to be 2 x 10(5) s(-1) and 2 x 10(4) s(-1) for the proton uptake to Glu-L212 and QB-*, respectively; (3) structural studies of altered proton transfer pathways in revertant RCs that lack the key amino acid Asp-L213 show a series of structural changes that propagate toward L213 potentially allowing Glu-H173 to participate in the proton transfer processes.

Coupling of light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake in photosynthesis

Light energy is transformed into chemical energy in photosynthesis by coupling a light-induced electron transfer to proton uptake. The resulting proton gradient drives ATP synthesis. In this study, we monitored the light-induced reactions in a 100-kDa photosynthetic protein from 30 ns to 35 s by FTIR difference spectroscopy. The results provide detailed mechanistic insights into the electron and proton transfer reactions of the QA to QB transition: reduction of QA in picoseconds induces protonation of histidines, probably of His126 and His128 in the H subunit at the entrance of the proton uptake channel, and of Asp210 in the L subunit inside the channel at 12 micros and 150 micros. This seems to be a prerequisite for the reduction of QB, mainly at 150 micros. QA- is reoxidized at 1.1 ms, and a proton is transferred from Asp210 to Glu212 in the L subunit, the proton donor to QB-. Notably, our data indicate that QB is not reduced directly by QA- but presumably through an intermediary electron donor.

Voltage-gated proton channels and other proton transfer pathways

Proton channels exist in a wide variety of membrane proteins where they transport protons rapidly and efficiently. Usually the proton pathway is formed mainly by water molecules present in the protein, but its function is regulated by titratable groups on critical amino acid residues in the pathway. All proton channels conduct protons by a hydrogen-bonded chain mechanism in which the proton hops from one water or titratable group to the next. Voltage-gated proton channels represent a specific subset of proton channels that have voltage- and time-dependent gating like other ion channels. However, they differ from most ion channels in their extraordinarily high selectivity, tiny conductance, strong temperature and deuterium isotope effects on conductance and gating kinetics, and insensitivity to block by steric occlusion. Gating of H(+) channels is regulated tightly by pH and voltage, ensuring that they open only when the electrochemical gradient is outward. Thus they function to extrude acid from cells. H(+) channels are expressed in many cells. During the respiratory burst in phagocytes, H(+) current compensates for electron extrusion by NADPH oxidase. Most evidence indicates that the H(+) channel is not part of the NADPH oxidase complex, but rather is a distinct and as yet unidentified molecule.

The position of QB in the photosynthetic reaction center depends on pH: a theoretical analysis of the proton uptake upon QB reduction

Electrostatics-based calculations have been performed to examine the proton uptake upon reduction of the terminal electron acceptor Q(B) in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides as a function of pH and the associated conformational equilibrium. Two crystal structures of the reaction center were considered: one structure was determined in the dark and the other under illumination. In the two structures, the Q(B) was found in two different positions, proximal or distal to the nonheme iron. Because Q(B) was found mainly in the distal position in the dark and only in the proximal position under illumination, the two positions have been attributed mostly to the oxidized and the reduced forms of Q(B), respectively. We calculated the proton uptake upon Q(B) reduction by four different models. In the first model, Q(B) is allowed to equilibrate between the two positions with either oxidation state. This equilibrium was allowed to vary with pH. In the other three models the distribution of Q(B) between the proximal position and the distal position was pH-independent, with Q(B) occupying only the distal position or only the proximal position or populating the two positions with a fixed ratio. Only the first model, which includes the pH-dependent conformational equilibrium, reproduces both the experimentally measured pH dependence of the proton uptake and the crystallographically observed conformational equilibrium at pH 8. From this model, we find that Q(B) occupies only the distal position below pH 6.5 and only the proximal position above pH 9.0 in both oxidation states. Between these pH values both positions are partially occupied. The reduced Q(B) has a higher occupancy in the proximal position than the oxidized Q(B). In summary, the present results indicate that the conformational equilibrium of Q(B) depends not only on the redox state of Q(B), but also on the pH value of the solution.

The DMPC lipid phase transition influences differently the first and the second electron transfer reactions in bacterial reaction centers

Photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were incorporated in dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) liposomes. The first and second electron transfer rates (k(AB)(1) and k(AB)(2), respectively) between the first and the second quinone electron acceptors have been measured as a function of temperature, across the phase transition of DMPC (23 degrees C). The Eyring plots of k(AB)(1) display straight lines. In contrast, the Eyring plots for k(AB)(2) in proteoliposomes show a break at about 23.5 degrees C. This physical discrimination between the two electron transfer reactions demonstrates that the stiffness of the lipid environment of the RCs and/or the protein-protein interactions influence the parameters governing k(AB)(2), but not the gating process limiting k(AB)(1).

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows coupling of GLu-L212 protonation and electron transfer to Q(B) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

Rapid-scan Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy was used to investigate the electron transfer reaction Q(A-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B-) (k(AB)(1)) in mutant reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, where Asp-L210 and/or Asp-M17 have been replaced with Asn. Mutation of both residues decreases drastically k(AB)(1)), attributed to slow proton transfer to Glu-L212, which becomes rate limiting for electron transfer to Q(B) [M.L. Paddock et al., Biochemistry 40 (2001) 6893]. In the double mutant, the FTIR difference spectrum recorded during the time window 4-29 ms following a flash showed peaks at 1670 (-), 1601 (-) and 1467 (+) cm(-1), characteristic of Q(A) reduction. The time evolution of the spectra shows reoxidation of Q(A-) and concomitant reduction of Q(B) with a kinetics of about 40 ms. In native reaction centers and in both single mutants, formation of Q(B-) occurs much faster than in the double mutant. Within the time resolution of the technique, protonation of Glu-L212, as characterized by an absorption increase at 1728 cm(-1) [E. Nabedryk et al., Biochemistry 34 (1995) 14722], was found to proceed with the same kinetics as reduction of Q(B) in all samples. These rapid-scan FTIR results support the model of proton uptake being rate limiting for the first electron transfer from Q(A-) to Q(B) and the identification of Glu-L212 as the main proton acceptor in the state Q(A)Q(B-).