Functional capabilities of an N-formyl peptide receptor-G(alpha)(i)(2) fusion protein: assemblies with G proteins and arrestins

Twenty years of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER: Historical and personal perspectives

Estrogens play a critical role in many aspects of physiology, particularly female reproductive function, but also in pathophysiology, and are associated with protection from numerous diseases in premenopausal women. Steroids and the effects of estrogen have been known for ∼90 years, with the first evidence for a receptor for estrogen presented ∼50 years ago. The original ancestral steroid receptor, extending back into evolution more than 500 million years, was likely an estrogen receptor, whereas G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) trace their origins back into history more than one billion years. The classical estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) are ligand-activated transcription factors that confer estrogen sensitivity upon many genes. It was soon apparent that these, or novel receptors may also be responsible for the "rapid"/"non-genomic" membrane-associated effects of estrogen. The identification of an orphan GPCR (GPR30, published in 1996) opened a new field of research with the description in 2000 that GPR30 expression is required for rapid estrogen signaling. In 2005-2006, the field was greatly stimulated by two studies that described the binding of estrogen to GPR30-expressing cell membranes, followed by the identification of a GPR30-selective agonist (that lacked binding and activity towards ERα and ERβ). Renamed GPER (G protein-coupled estrogen receptor) by IUPHAR in 2007, the total number of articles in PubMed related to this receptor recently surpassed 1000. In this article, the authors present personal perspectives on how they became involved in the discovery and/or advancement of GPER research. These areas include non-genomic effects on vascular tone, receptor cloning, molecular and cellular biology, signal transduction mechanisms and pharmacology of GPER, highlighting the roles of GPER and GPER-selective compounds in diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and cancer and the obligatory role of GPER in propagating cardiovascular aging, arterial hypertension and heart failure through the stimulation of Nox expression.

Fluorescent approaches for understanding interactions of ligands with G protein coupled receptors

G protein coupled receptors are responsible for a wide variety of signaling responses in diverse cell types. Despite major advances in the determination of structures of this class of receptors, the underlying mechanisms by which binding of different types of ligands specifically elicits particular signaling responses remain unclear. The use of fluorescence spectroscopy can provide important information about the process of ligand binding and ligand dependent conformational changes in receptors, especially kinetic aspects of these processes that can be difficult to extract from X-ray structures. We present an overview of the extensive array of fluorescent ligands that have been used in studies of G protein coupled receptors and describe spectroscopic approaches for assaying binding and probing the environment of receptor-bound ligands with particular attention to examples involving yeast pheromone receptors. In addition, we discuss the use of fluorescence spectroscopy for detecting and characterizing conformational changes in receptors induced by the binding of ligands. Such studies have provided strong evidence for diversity of receptor conformations elicited by different ligands, consistent with the idea that GPCRs are not simple on and off switches. This diversity of states constitutes an underlying mechanistic basis for biased agonism, the observation that different stimuli can produce different responses from a single receptor. It is likely that continued technical advances will allow fluorescence spectroscopy to play an important role in continued probing of structural transitions in G protein coupled receptors. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Structural and biophysical characterisation of membrane protein-ligand binding.

Noncanonical control of vasopressin receptor type 2 signaling by retromer and arrestin

The vasopressin type 2 receptor (V2R) is a critical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for vertebrate physiology, including the balance of water and sodium ions. It is unclear how its two native hormones, vasopressin (VP) and oxytocin (OT), both stimulate the same cAMP/PKA pathway yet produce divergent antinatriuretic and antidiuretic effects that are either strong (VP) or weak (OT). Here, we present a new mechanism that differentiates the action of VP and OT on V2R signaling. We found that vasopressin, as opposed to OT, continued to generate cAMP and promote PKA activation for prolonged periods after ligand washout and receptor internalization in endosomes. Contrary to the classical model of arrestin-mediated GPCR desensitization, arrestins bind the VP-V2R complex yet extend rather than shorten the generation of cAMP. Signaling is instead turned off by the endosomal retromer complex. We propose that this mechanism explains how VP sustains water and Na(+) transport in renal collecting duct cells. Together with recent work on the parathyroid hormone receptor, these data support the existence of a novel "noncanonical" regulatory pathway for GPCR activation and response termination, via the sequential action of β-arrestin and the retromer complex.

Rapid-mix flow cytometry measurements of subsecond regulation of G protein-coupled receptor ternary complex dynamics by guanine nucleotides

We have used rapid-mix flow cytometry to analyze the early subsecond dynamics of the disassembly of ternary complexes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) immobilized on beads to examine individual steps associated with guanine nucleotide activation. Our earlier studies suggested that the slow dissociation of Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits was unlikely to be an essential component of cell activation. However, these studies did not have adequate time resolution to define precisely the disassembly kinetics. Ternary complexes were assembled using three formyl peptide receptor constructs (wild type, formyl peptide receptor-Galpha(i2) fusion, and formyl peptide receptor-green fluorescent protein fusion) and two isotypes of the alpha subunit (alpha(i2) and alpha(i3)) and betagamma dimer (beta(1)gamma(2) and beta(4)gamma(2)). At saturating nucleotide levels, the disassembly of a significant fraction of ternary complexes occurred on a subsecond time frame for alpha(i2) complexes and tau(1/2)< or =4s for alpha(i3) complexes, time scales that are compatible with cell activation. beta(1)gamma(2) isotype complexes were generally more stable than beta(4)gamma(2)-associated complexes. The comparison of the three constructs, however, proved that the fast step was associated with the separation of receptor and G protein and that the dissociation of the ligand or of the alpha and betagamma subunits was slower. These results are compatible with a cell activation model involving G protein conformational changes rather than disassembly of Galphabetagamma heterotrimer.

Some mechanistic insights into GPCR activation from detergent-solubilized ternary complexes on beads

The binding of full and partial agonist ligands (L) to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiates the formation of ternary complexes with G proteins [ligand-receptor-G protein (LRG) complexes]. Cyclic ternary complex models are required to account for the thermodynamically plausible complexes. It has recently become possible to assemble solubilized formyl peptide receptor (FPR) and beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) ternary complexes for flow cytometric bead-based assays. In these systems, soluble ternary complex formation of the receptors with G proteins allows direct quantitative measurements which can be analyzed in terms of three-dimensional concentrations (molarity). In contrast to the difficulty of analyzing comparable measurements in two-dimensional membrane systems, the output of these flow cytometric experiments can be analyzed via ternary complex simulations in which all of the parameters can be estimated. An outcome from such analysis yielded lower affinity for soluble ternary complex assembly by partial agonists compared with full agonists for the beta(2)AR. In the four-sided ternary complex model, this behavior is consistent with distinct ligand-induced conformational states for full and partial agonists. Rapid mix flow cytometry is used to analyze the subsecond dynamics of guanine nucleotide-mediated ternary complex disassembly. The modular breakup of ternary complex components is highlighted by the finding that the fastest step involves the departure of the ligand-activated GPCR from the intact G protein heterotrimer. The data also show that, under these experimental conditions, G protein subunit dissociation does not occur within the time frame relevant to signaling. The data and concepts are discussed in the context of a review of current literature on signaling mechanism based on structural and spectroscopic (FRET) studies of ternary complex components.

Activation and regulation of platelet-activating factor receptor: role of G(i) and G(q) in receptor-mediated chemotactic, cytotoxic, and cross-regulatory signals

Platelet-activating factor (1-O-alkyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerolphosphocholine; PAF) induces leukocyte accumulation and activation at sites of inflammation via the activation of a specific cell surface receptor (PAFR). PAFR couples to both pertussis toxin-sensitive and pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins to activate leukocytes. To define the role(s) of G(i) and G(q) in PAF-induced leukocyte responses, two G-protein-linked receptors were generated by fusing G alpha(i3) (PAFR-G alpha(i3)) or G alpha(q) (PAFR-G alpha(q)) at the C terminus of PAFR. Rat basophilic leukemia cell line (RBL-2H3) stably expressing wild-type PAFR, PAFR-G alpha(i3), or PAFR-G alpha(q) was generated and characterized. All receptor variants bound PAF with similar affinities to mediate G-protein activation, intracellular Ca2+ mobilization, phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, and secretion of beta-hexosaminidase. PAFR-G alpha(i3) and PAFR-G alpha(q) mediated greater GTPase activity in isolated membranes than PAFR but lower PI hydrolysis and secretion in whole cells. PAFR and PAFR-G alpha(i3), but not PAFR-G alpha(q), mediated chemotaxis to PAF. All three receptors underwent phosphorylation and desensitization upon exposure to PAF but only PAFR translocated beta arrestin to the cell membrane and internalized. In RBL-2H3 cells coexpressing the PAFRs along with CXCR1, IL-8 (CXCL8) cross-desensitized Ca2+ mobilization to PAF by all the receptors but only PAFR-G alpha(i3) activation cross-inhibited the response of CXCR1 to CXCL8. Altogether, the data indicate that G(i) exclusively mediates chemotactic and cross-regulatory signals of the PAFR, but both G(i) and G(q) activate PI hydrolysis and exocytosis by this receptor. Because chemotaxis and cross-desensitization are exclusively mediated by G(i), the data suggest that differential activation of both G(i) and G(q) by PAFR likely mediate specific as well as redundant signaling pathways.

Constitutive ERK1/2 activation by a chimeric neurokinin 1 receptor-beta-arrestin1 fusion protein. Probing the composition and function of the G protein-coupled receptor "signalsome"

The beta-arrestins, a small family of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-binding proteins involved in receptor desensitization, have been shown to bind extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and function as scaffolds for GPCR-stimulated ERK1/2 activation. To better understand the mechanism of beta-arrestin-mediated ERK1/2 activation, we compared ERK1/2 activation by the wild-type neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor with a chimeric NK1 receptor having beta-arrestin1 fused to the receptor C terminus (NK1-betaArr1). The NK1 receptor couples to both G(s) and G(q/11), resides on the plasma membrane, and mediates rapid ERK1/2 activation and nuclear translocation in response to neurokinin A. In contrast, NK1-betaArr1 is a G protein-uncoupled "constitutively desensitized" receptor that resides almost entirely in an intracellular endosomal compartment. Despite its inability to respond to neurokinin A, we found that NK1-betaArr1 expression caused robust constitutive activation of cytosolic ERK1/2 and that endogenous Raf, MEK1/2, and ERK1/2 coprecipitated in a complex with NK1-betaArr1. While agonist-dependent ERK1/2 activation by the NK1 receptor was independent of protein kinase A (PKA) or PKC activity, NK1-betaArr1-mediated ERK1/2 activation was completely inhibited when basal PKA and PKC activity were blocked. In addition, the rate of ERK1/2 dephosphorylation was slowed in NK1-betaArr1-expressing cells, suggesting that beta-arrestin-bound ERK1/2 is protected from mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase activity. These data suggest that beta-arrestin binding to GPCRs nucleates the formation of a stable "signalsome" that functions as a passive scaffold for the ERK1/2 cascade while confining ERK1/2 activity to an extranuclear compartment.

Fluorophore-tagged GPCR ligands

Fluorescently tagged drug molecules can be successfully employed to visualize the location of their receptor target at the single-cell level. Furthermore, if their binding to the receptor is reversible, one can now obtain detailed pharmacological information such as affinity using single-molecule detection techniques. When coupled to the growing exploitation of fluorescence-based read-outs in high throughput and high content screening, it is clear that fluorescent molecules offer a safer, more powerful and more versatile alternative to radioligands in molecular pharmacology and drug discovery. GPCR pharmacology has benefited enormously from the application of fluorescence-based technologies and we now possess a much greater understanding of this receptor family's basic molecular mechanisms of action through the careful design and judicious use of fluorescent peptide and small-molecule-based ligands.

Techniques: GPCR assembly, pharmacology and screening by flow cytometry

Flow cytometers are well known for their ability to analyze and sort cells at high rates based on physiological responses and expression of protein markers. The potential for flow cytometry in G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research, however, is less well appreciated. Potential applications include: (i) the homogenous discrimination of free and bound ligands or proteins in both cellular and microsphere-based assays; and (ii) multiplexed ('suspension array') analysis of cell responses and protein-protein interactions. Innovative sample-handling systems also provide sub-second resolution of interaction kinetics and 1 second per well throughput of microliter-sized samples from multiwell plates. Flow cytometric methods using microspheres for analysis of GPCRs that interact with intracellular and extracellular binding partners such as ligands, G proteins and kinases have been established. These analyses can produce quantitative pharmacological data analogous to radioligand assays, and, in some cases, the probes can be integrated into the assembly as fluorescent fusion proteins.

Characterization of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor beta-arrestin 2 interaction: a high-affinity receptor phenotype

To dissect the interaction between beta-arrestin ((beta)arr) and family B G protein-coupled receptors, we constructed fusion proteins between the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor and (beta)arr2. The fusion constructs had an increase in apparent affinity selectively for glucagon, suggesting that (beta)arr2 interaction locks the receptor in a high-affinity conformation, which can be explored by some, but not all, ligands. The fusion constructs adopted a signaling phenotype governed by the tethered (beta)arr2 with an attenuated G protein-mediated cAMP signal and a higher maximal internalization compared with wild-type receptors. This distinct phenotype of the fusion proteins can not be mimicked by coexpressing wild-type receptor with (beta)arr2. However, when the wild-type receptor was coexpressed with both (beta)arr2 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5, a phenotype similar to that observed for the fusion constructs was observed. We conclude that the glucagon-like peptide 1 fusion construct mimics the natural interaction of the receptor with (beta)arr2 with respect to binding peptide ligands, G protein-mediated signaling and internalization, and that this distinct molecular phenotype is reminiscent of that which has previously been characterized for family A G protein-coupled receptors, suggesting similarities in the effect of (beta)arr interaction between family A and B receptors also at the molecular level.

Comparative analysis of high-affinity ligand binding and G protein coupling of the human CXCR1 chemokine receptor and of a CXCR1-Galpha fusion protein after heterologous production in baculovirus-infected insect cells

In order to perform biochemical and pharmacological characterization of CXCR1, we designed several CXCR1 constructs. All constructs, including a CXCR1-G(i2)alpha fusion protein, were produced in insect cells after infection with recombinant baculovirus. The recombinant receptors exhibited specific high-affinity binding of (125)I-labelled interleukin-8, and Scatchard transformation of the binding data indicated the presence of a population of single homogenous binding sites. Furthermore, the pharmacological profiles for the different CXCR1 constructs produced in the baculovirus-infected insect cells were almost identical to those reported for CXCR1 on human neutrophils. Interestingly, when the CXCR1 constructs were coproduced with G(i2) protein as a result of coinfection with baculoviruses encoding the G(i2)alpha-, the beta- and the gamma- subunits, the B(max) values were significantly increased. Hence, the level of FlagCXCR1Bio, after coproduction with G(i2) protein, was found to be almost 10 times higher than that of the FlagCXCR1Bio alone. However, no differences in the K(i) values were observed of the receptor constructs produced either after single infection or coinfection of insect cells. The addition of guanyl-5'-yl imidodiphosphate resulted in a dramatic reduction of the number of binding sites; however, the K(i) values remained unchanged, indicating coupling of the receptor to the guanine nucleotide-binding protein.

Ligand-receptor-G-protein molecular assemblies on beads for mechanistic studies and screening by flow cytometry

G protein-coupled receptors form a ternary complex of ligand, receptor, and G protein heterotrimer (LRG) during signal transduction from the outside to the inside of a cell. Our goal was to develop a homogeneous, small-volume, bead-based approach compatible with high-throughput flow cytometry that would allow evaluation of G protein coupled receptor molecular assemblies. Dextran beads were derivatized to carry chelated nickel to bind hexahistidine-tagged green fluorescent protein (GFP) and hexahistidine-tagged G proteins. Ternary complexes were assembled on these beads using fluorescent ligand with wild-type receptor or a receptor-Gialpha2 fusion protein, and with a nonfluorescent ligand and receptor-GFP fusion protein. Streptavidin-coated polystyrene beads used biotinylated anti-FLAG antibodies to bind FLAG-tagged G proteins for ternary complex assembly. Validation was achieved by showing time and concentration dependence of ternary complex formation. Affinity measurements of ligand for receptor on particles, of the ligand-receptor complex for G protein on the particles, and receptor-Gialpha2 fusion protein for Gbetagamma, were consistent with comparable assemblies in detergent suspension. Performance was assessed in applications representing the potential of these assemblies for ternary complex mechanisms. We showed the relationship for a family of ligands between LR and LRG affinity and characterized the affinity of both the wild-type and GFP fusion receptors with G protein. We also showed the potential of kinetic measurements to allow observation of individual steps of GTP-induced ternary complex disassembly and discriminated a fast step caused by RG disassembly compared with the slower step of Galphabetagamma disassembly.