Phosphorylation of a single head of smooth muscle myosin activates the whole molecule

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the myosin mesa: viewing an old disease in a new light

The sarcomere is an exquisitely designed apparatus that is capable of generating force, which in the case of the heart results in the pumping of blood throughout the body. At the molecular level, an ATP-dependent interaction of myosin with actin drives the contraction and force generation of the sarcomere. Over the past six decades, work on muscle has yielded tremendous insights into the workings of the sarcomeric system. We now stand on the cusp where the acquired knowledge of how the sarcomere contracts and how that contraction is regulated can be extended to an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of sarcomeric diseases, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). In this review we present a picture that combines current knowledge of the myosin mesa, the sequestered state of myosin heads on the thick filament, known as the interacting-heads motif (IHM), their possible interaction with myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C) and how these interactions can be abrogated leading to hyper-contractility, a key clinical manifestation of HCM. We discuss the structural and functional basis of the IHM state of the myosin heads and identify HCM-causing mutations that can directly impact the equilibrium between the 'on state' of the myosin heads (the open state) and the IHM 'off state'. We also hypothesize a role of MyBP-C in helping to maintain myosin heads in the IHM state on the thick filament, allowing release in a graded manner upon adrenergic stimulation. By viewing clinical hyper-contractility as the result of the destabilization of the IHM state, our aim is to view an old disease in a new light.

Mechanisms of Vascular Smooth Muscle Contraction and the Basis for Pharmacologic Treatment of Smooth Muscle Disorders

The smooth muscle cell directly drives the contraction of the vascular wall and hence regulates the size of the blood vessel lumen. We review here the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms by which agonists, therapeutics, and diseases regulate contractility of the vascular smooth muscle cell and we place this within the context of whole body function. We also discuss the implications for personalized medicine and highlight specific potential target molecules that may provide opportunities for the future development of new therapeutics to regulate vascular function.

Graded effects of unregulated smooth muscle myosin on intestinal architecture, intestinal motility and vascular function in zebrafish

Smooth muscle contraction is controlled by the regulated activity of the myosin heavy chain ATPase (Myh11). Myh11 mutations have diverse effects in the cardiovascular, digestive and genitourinary systems in humans and animal models. We previously reported a recessive missense mutation, meltdown (mlt), which converts a highly conserved tryptophan to arginine (W512R) in the rigid relay loop of zebrafish Myh11. The mlt mutation disrupts myosin regulation and non-autonomously induces invasive expansion of the intestinal epithelium. Here, we report two newly identified missense mutations in the switch-1 (S237Y) and coil-coiled (L1287M) domains of Myh11 that fail to complement mlt Cell invasion was not detected in either homozygous mutant but could be induced by oxidative stress and activation of oncogenic signaling pathways. The smooth muscle defect imparted by the mlt and S237Y mutations also delayed intestinal transit, and altered vascular function, as measured by blood flow in the dorsal aorta. The cell-invasion phenotype induced by the three myh11 mutants correlated with the degree of myosin deregulation. These findings suggest that the vertebrate intestinal epithelium is tuned to the physical state of the surrounding stroma, which, in turn, governs its response to physiologic and pathologic stimuli. Genetic variants that alter the regulation of smooth muscle myosin might be risk factors for diseases affecting the intestine, vasculature, and other tissues that contain smooth muscle or contractile cells that express smooth muscle proteins, particularly in the setting of redox stress.

Mechanical coupling between myosin molecules causes differences between ensemble and single-molecule measurements

In contracting muscle, individual myosin molecules function as part of a large ensemble, hydrolyzing ATP to power the relative sliding of actin filaments. The technological advances that have enabled direct observation and manipulation of single molecules, including recent experiments that have explored myosin's force-dependent properties, provide detailed insight into the kinetics of myosin's mechanochemical interaction with actin. However, it has been difficult to reconcile these single-molecule observations with the behavior of myosin in an ensemble. Here, using a combination of simulations and theory, we show that the kinetic mechanism derived from single-molecule experiments describes ensemble behavior; but the connection between single molecule and ensemble is complex. In particular, even in the absence of external force, internal forces generated between myosin molecules in a large ensemble accelerate ADP release and increase how far actin moves during a single myosin attachment. These myosin-induced changes in strong binding lifetime and attachment distance cause measurable properties, such as actin speed in the motility assay, to vary depending on the number of myosin molecules interacting with an actin filament. This ensemble-size effect challenges the simple detachment limited model of motility, because even when motility speed is limited by ADP release, increasing attachment rate can increase motility speed.

Collective dynamics of elastically coupled myosin V motors

Characterization of the collective behaviors of different classes of processive motor proteins has become increasingly important to understand various intracellular trafficking and transport processes. This work examines the dynamics of structurally-defined motor complexes containing two myosin Va (myoVa) motors that are linked together via a molecular scaffold formed from a single duplex of DNA. Dynamic changes in the filament-bound configuration of these complexes due to motor binding, stepping, and detachment were monitored by tracking the positions of different color quantum dots that report the position of one head of each myoVa motor on actin. As in studies of multiple kinesins, the run lengths produced by two myosins are only slightly larger than those of single motor molecules. This suggests that internal strain within the complexes, due to asynchronous motor stepping and the resultant stretching of motor linkages, yields net negative cooperative behaviors. In contrast to multiple kinesins, multiple myosin complexes move with appreciably lower velocities than a single-myosin molecule. Although similar trends are predicted by a discrete state stochastic model of collective motor dynamics, these analyses also suggest that multiple myosin velocities and run lengths depend on both the compliance and the effective size of their cargo. Moreover, it is proposed that this unique collective behavior occurs because the large step size and relatively small stalling force of myoVa leads to a high sensitivity of motor stepping rates to strain.

Phosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin shows an open conformation linked to activation

Smooth muscle myosin and smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (smHMM) are activated by regulatory light chain phosphorylation, but the mechanism remains unclear. Dephosphorylated, inactive smHMM assumes a closed conformation with asymmetric intramolecular head-head interactions between motor domains. The "free head" can bind to actin, but the actin binding interface of the "blocked head" is involved in interactions with the free head. We report here a three-dimensional structure for phosphorylated, active smHMM obtained using electron crystallography of two-dimensional arrays. Head-head interactions of phosphorylated smHMM resemble those found in the dephosphorylated state but occur between different molecules, not within the same molecule. The light chain binding domain structure of phosphorylated smHMM differs markedly from that of the "blocked" head of dephosphorylated smHMM. We hypothesize that regulatory light chain phosphorylation opens the inhibited conformation primarily by its effect on the blocked head. Singly phosphorylated smHMM is not compatible with the closed conformation if the blocked head is phosphorylated. This concept has implications for the extent of myosin activation at low levels of phosphorylation in smooth muscle.

Modeling smooth muscle myosin's two heads: long-lived enzymatic roles and phosphorylation-dependent equilibria

Smooth muscle myosin has two heads, each capable of interacting with actin to generate force and/or motion as it hydrolyzes ATP. These heads are inhibited when their associated regulatory light chain is unphosphorylated (0P), becoming active and hydrolyzing ATP maximally when phosphorylated (2P). Interestingly, with only one of the two regulatory light chains phosphorylated (1P), smooth muscle myosin is active but its ATPase rate is <2P. To explain published 1P single ATP turnover and steady-state ATPase activities, we propose a kinetic model in which 1P myosin exists in an equilibrium between being fully active (2P) and inhibited (0P). Based on the single ATP turnover data, we also propose that each 2P head adopts a hydrolytic role distinct from its partner at any point in time, i.e., one head strongly binds actin and hydrolyzes ATP at its actin-activated rate while the other weakly binds actin. Surprisingly, the heads switch roles slowly (<0.1 s(-1)), suggesting that their activities are not independent. The phosphorylation-dependent equilibrium between active and inhibited states and the hydrolytic role that each head adopts during its interaction with actin may have implications for understanding regulation and mechanical performance of other members of the myosin family of molecular motors.

Simultaneous observation of tail and head movements of myosin V during processive motion

Processive stepping of myosin Va (myoV) has been tracked by monitoring either the tail position (center of mass) or the position of one or both heads. Here, we combine these two approaches by attaching a quantum dot to one of the motor domains and a bead to the tail. Using laser trapping and total internal reflection microscopy, the position of one head and the tail are observed simultaneously as myoV moves processively on an actin filament bundle against the resistive load of the laser trap. The head moves one step (73 ± 10 nm) for every two steps of the tail (35 ± 9 nm). One tail step occurs concurrently with quantum dot-labeled head movement, whereas the other occurs with movement of the unlabeled head, consistent with a hand-over-hand model. Load increases the probability of the motor taking a back step. The back step is triggered by the motor taking a shorter forward step (head step, 68 ± 11 nm; tail step, 32 ± 10 nm), likely one actin monomer short of its preferred binding site. During a back step, the motor reverses its hand-over-hand motion, with the leading head detaching and reattaching to one of multiple actin sites behind the trailing head. After a back step, the motor can correct its mistake and step processively forward at resistive loads <0.7 piconewton or stall or detach at higher loads. Back stepping may provide a mechanism to ensure efficient cargo delivery even when myoV encounters obstacles within the actin cytoskeletal meshwork or when other motors are attached to the same cargo.

Phosphorylation-induced structural changes in smooth muscle myosin regulatory light chain

We have performed complementary time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET) experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to elucidate structural changes in the phosphorylation domain (PD) of smooth muscle regulatory light chain (RLC) bound to myosin. PD is absent in crystal structures, leaving uncertainty about the mechanism of regulation. Donor-acceptor pairs of probes were attached to three site-directed di-Cys mutants of RLC, each having one Cys at position 129 in the C-terminal lobe and the other at position 2, 3, or 7 in the N-terminal PD. Labeled RLC was reconstituted onto myosin subfragment 1 (S1). TR-FRET resolved two simultaneously populated structural states of RLC, closed and open, in both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated biochemical states. All three FRET pairs show that phosphorylation shifts the equilibrium toward the open state, increasing its mol fraction by approximately 20%. MD simulations agree with experiments in remarkable detail, confirming the coexistence of two structural states, with phosphorylation shifting the system toward the more dynamic open structural state. This agreement between experiment and simulation validates the additional structural details provided by MD simulations: In the closed state, PD is bent onto the surface of the C-terminal lobe, stabilized by interdomain salt bridges. In the open state, PD is more helical and straight, resides farther from the C-terminal lobe, and is stabilized by an intradomain salt bridge. The result is a vivid atomic-resolution visualization of the first step in the molecular mechanism by which phosphorylation activates smooth muscle.

Modification of loop 1 affects the nucleotide binding properties of Myo1c, the adaptation motor in the inner ear

Myo1c is one of eight members of the mammalian myosin I family of actin-associated molecular motors. In stereocilia of the hair cells in the inner ear, Myo1c presumably serves as the adaptation motor, which regulates the opening and closing of transduction channels. Although there is conservation of sequence and structure among all myosins in the N-terminal motor domain, which contains the nucleotide- and actin-binding sites, some differences include the length and composition of surface loops, including loop 1, which lies near the nucleotide-binding domain. To investigate the role of loop 1, we expressed in insect cells mutants of a truncated form of Myo1c, Myo1c(1IQ), as well as chimeras of Myo1c(1IQ) with the analogous loop from other myosins. We found that replacement of the charged residues in loop 1 with alanines or the whole loop with a series of alanines did not alter the ATPase activity, transient kinetics properties, or Ca(2+) sensitivity of Myo1c(1IQ). Substitution of loop 1 with that of the corresponding region from tonic smooth muscle myosin II (Myo1c(1IQ)-tonic) or replacement with a single glycine (Myo1c(1IQ)-G) accelerated the release of ADP from A.M 2-3-fold in Ca(2+), whereas substitution with loop 1 from phasic muscle myosin II (Myo1c(1IQ)-phasic) accelerated the release of ADP 35-fold. Motility assays with chimeras containing a single alpha-helix, or SAH, domain showed that Myo1c(SAH)-tonic translocated actin in vitro twice as fast as Myo1c(SAH)-WT and 3-fold faster than Myo1c(SAH)-G. The studies show that changes induced in Myo1c via modification of loop 1 showed no resemblance to the behavior of the loop donor myosins or to the changes previously observed with similar Myo1b chimeras.

Smooth muscle heavy meromyosin phosphorylated on one of its two heads supports force and motion

Smooth muscle myosin is activated by regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation. In the unphosphorylated state the activity of both heads is suppressed due to an asymmetric, intramolecular interaction between the heads. The properties of myosin with only one of its two RLCs phosphorylated, a state likely to be present both during the activation and the relaxation phase of smooth muscle, is less certain despite much investigation. Here we further characterize the mechanical properties of an expressed heavy meromyosin (HMM) construct with only one of its RLCs phosphorylated (HMM-1P). This construct was previously shown to have more than 50% of the ATPase activity of fully phosphorylated myosin (HMM-2P) and to move actin at the same speed in a motility assay as HMM-2P (Rovner, A. S., Fagnant, P. M., and Trybus, K. M. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 5280-5289). Here we show that the unitary step size and attachment time to actin of HMM-1P is indistinguishable from that of HMM-2P. Force-velocity measurements on small ensembles show that HMM-1P can generate approximately half the force of HMM-2P, which may relate to the observed duty ratio of HMM-1P being approximately half that of HMM-2P. Therefore, single-phosphorylated smooth muscle HMM molecules are active species, and the head associated with the unphosphorylated RLC is mechanically competent, allowing it to make a substantial contribution to both motion and force generation during smooth muscle contraction.

Smooth muscle myosin phosphorylated at single head shows sustained mechanical activity

Smooth muscle contraction is regulated by the phosphorylation of myosin. It is well known that tonic smooth muscles can maintain force with low energy consumption (latch state); however, the molecular mechanism underlying this phenomenon is unresolved. Here we show that single-head phosphorylated smooth myosin (SHPMII) exhibits fast ( approximately 24 s(-1)) and slow prolonged ( approximately 1 s(-1)) actin interactions, whereas double-head phosphorylated myosin (DHPMII) predominantly exhibits the fast ( approximately 29 s(-1)) interaction, suggesting that the phosphorylated head of SHPMII is mechanically as active as that of DHPMII. Both the fast and the slow actin interactions of SHPMII support the positive net mechanical displacement of actin. The actin translocating velocity of SHPMII was much slower than that of DHPMII, which is consistent with the slow actin interaction of SHPMII. We propose that the "latch state" can be explained by the motor characteristics of SHPMII that is present during the sustained phase of contraction.

Molecular dynamics simulations reveal a disorder-to-order transition on phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin

We have performed molecular dynamics simulations of the phosphorylated (at S-19) and the unphosphorylated 25-residue N-terminal phosphorylation domain of the regulatory light chain (RLC) of smooth muscle myosin to provide insight into the structural basis of regulation. This domain does not appear in any crystal structure, so these simulations were combined with site-directed spin labeling to define its structure and dynamics. Simulations were carried out in explicit water at 310 K, starting with an ideal alpha-helix. In the absence of phosphorylation, large portions of the domain (residues S-2 to K-11 and R-16 through Y-21) were metastable throughout the simulation, undergoing rapid transitions among alpha-helix, pi-helix, and turn, whereas residues K-12 to Q-15 remained highly disordered, displaying a turn motif from 1 to 22.5 ns and a random coil pattern from 22.5 to 50 ns. Phosphorylation increased alpha-helical order dramatically in residues K-11 to A-17 but caused relatively little change in the immediate vicinity of the phosphorylation site (S-19). Phosphorylation also increased the overall dynamic stability, as evidenced by smaller temporal fluctuations in the root mean-square deviation. These results on the isolated phosphorylation domain, predicting a disorder-to-order transition induced by phosphorylation, are remarkably consistent with published experimental data involving site-directed spin labeling of the intact RLC bound to the two-headed heavy meromyosin. The simulations provide new insight into structural details not revealed by experiment, allowing us to propose a refined model for the mechanism by which phosphorylation affects the N-terminal domain of the RLC of smooth muscle myosin.

Myosin II isoforms in smooth muscle: heterogeneity and function

Both smooth muscle (SM) and nonmuscle class II myosin molecules are expressed in SM tissues comprising hollow organ systems. Individual SM cells may express one or more of multiple myosin II isoforms that differ in myosin heavy chain (MHC) and myosin light chain (MLC) subunits. Although much has been learned, the expression profiles, organization within contractile filaments, localization within cells, and precise roles in various contractile functions of these different myosin molecules are still not well understood. However, data supporting unique physiological roles for certain isoforms continues to build. Isoform differences located in the S1 head region of the MHC can alter actin binding and rates of ATP hydrolysis. Differences located in the MHC tail can alter the formation, stability, and size of the myosin thick filament. In these distinct ways, both head and tail isoform differences can alter force generation and muscle shortening velocities. The MLCs that are associated with the lever arm of the S1 head can affect the flexibility and range of motion of this domain and possibly the motion of the S2 and motor domains. Phosphorylation of MLC(20) has been associated with conformational changes in the S1 and/or S2 fragments regulating enzymatic activity of the entire myosin molecule. A challenge for the future will be delineation of the physiological significance of the heterogeneous expression of these isoforms in developmental, tissue-specific, and species-specific patterns and or the intra- and intercellular heterogeneity of myosin isoform expression in SM cells of a given organ.