Protein-nucleic acid interactions during open complex formation investigated by systematic alteration of the protein and DNA binding partners

The telomere resolvase, TelA, utilizes an underwound pre-cleavage intermediate to promote hairpin telomere formation

The telomere resolvase, TelA, forms the hairpin telomeres of the linear chromosome of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in a process referred to as telomere resolution. Telomere resolution is a unique DNA cleavage and rejoining reaction that resolves replicated telomere junctions into a pair of hairpin telomeres. Telomere resolvases utilize a reaction mechanism with similarities to that of topoisomerase-IB enzymes and tyrosine recombinases. The reaction proceeds without the need for high-energy cofactors due to the use of a covalent, enzyme-cleaved DNA intermediate that stores the bond energy of the cleaved bonds in 3'-phosphotyrosyl linkages. The cleaved DNA strands are then refolded into a hairpin conformation and the 5'-OH ends of the refolded strands attack the 3'-phosphotyrosine linkages in order to rejoin the DNA strands into hairpin telomeres. Because this kind of reaction mechanism is, in principle, reversible it is unclear how TelA controls the direction of the reaction and propels the reaction to completion. We present evidence that TelA forms and/or stabilizes a pre-cleavage intermediate that features breakage of the four central basepairs between the scissile phosphates prior to DNA cleavage to help propel the reaction forwards, thus preventing abortive cleavage and rejoining cycles that regenerate the substrate DNA. We identify eight TelA sidechains, located in the hairpin-binding module and catalytic domains of TelA, implicated in this process. These mutants were deficient for telomere resolution on parental replicated telomere junctions but were rescued by introduction of substrate modifications that mimic unwinding of the DNA between the scissile phosphates.

Transcription initiation at a consensus bacterial promoter proceeds via a 'bind-unwind-load-and-lock' mechanism

Transcription initiation starts with unwinding of promoter DNA by RNA polymerase (RNAP) to form a catalytically competent RNAP-promoter complex (RPo). Despite extensive study, the mechanism of promoter unwinding has remained unclear, in part due to the transient nature of intermediates on path to RPo. Here, using single-molecule unwinding-induced fluorescence enhancement to monitor promoter unwinding, and single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer to monitor RNAP clamp conformation, we analyse RPo formation at a consensus bacterial core promoter. We find that the RNAP clamp is closed during promoter binding, remains closed during promoter unwinding, and then closes further, locking the unwound DNA in the RNAP active-centre cleft. Our work defines a new, ‘bind-unwind-load-and-lock’, model for the series of conformational changes occurring during promoter unwinding at a consensus bacterial promoter and provides the tools needed to examine the process in other organisms and at other promoters.

An ideal spacing is required for the control of Class II CRP-dependent promoters by the status of CRP K100

Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP at Class II promoters is dependent on direct interactions between RNA polymerase and CRP, therefore the spatial proximity between both proteins plays a significant role in the ability of CRP to activate transcription. Using both in vivo and in vitro techniques, here we demonstrate that the CRP K100 positive charge, adjacent to AR2, is required for full promoter activity when CRP is optimally positioned. Accordingly, K100 mediated activation is very position-dependent and our data confirm that the largest impact of the K100 status on transcription activation occurs when the spacing between the CRP binding site and the A2 of the -10 element is 22 bp. From the results of this study and the progress in the understanding about open complex DNA scrunching, we propose that CRP-dependent promoters should now be numbered by the distance from the center of the DNA site for CRP and the most highly conserved base at position 2 of the -10 hexamer in bacterial promoters.

Redefining fundamental concepts of transcription initiation in bacteria

Despite enormous progress in understanding the fundamentals of bacterial gene regulation, our knowledge remains limited when compared with the number of bacterial genomes and regulatory systems to be discovered. Derived from a small number of initial studies, classic definitions for concepts of gene regulation have evolved as the number of characterized promoters has increased. Together with discoveries made using new technologies, this knowledge has led to revised generalizations and principles. In this Expert Recommendation, we suggest precise, updated definitions that support a logical, consistent conceptual framework of bacterial gene regulation, focusing on transcription initiation. The resulting concepts can be formalized by ontologies for computational modelling, laying the foundation for improved bioinformatics tools, knowledge-based resources and scientific communication. Thus, this work will help researchers construct better predictive models, with different formalisms, that will be useful in engineering, synthetic biology, microbiology and genetics.

Novel Escherichia coli RNA Polymerase Binding Protein Encoded by Bacteriophage T5

The Escherichia coli bacteriophage T5 has three temporal classes of genes (pre-early, early, and late). All three classes are transcribed by host RNA polymerase (RNAP) containing the σ⁷⁰ promoter specificity subunit. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the switching of viral transcription from one class to another remain unknown. Here, we find the product of T5 gene 026 (gpT5.026) in RNAP preparations purified from T5-infected cells and demonstrate in vitro its tight binding to E. coli RNAP. While proteins homologous to gpT5.026 are encoded by all T5-related phages, no similarities to proteins with known functions can be detected. GpT5.026 binds to two regions of the RNAP β subunit and moderately inhibits RNAP interaction with the discriminator region of σ⁷⁰-dependent promoters. A T5 mutant with disrupted gene 026 is viable, but the host cell lysis phase is prolongated and fewer virus particles are produced. During the mutant phage infection, the number of early transcripts increases, whereas the number of late transcripts decreases. We propose that gpT5.026 is part of the regulatory cascade that orchestrates a switch from early to late bacteriophage T5 transcription.

Modulation of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor promoter selectivity by spacer region sequence

The ability of bacteria to adapt to stress depends on the conditional expression of specific sets of genes. Bacillus subtilis encodes seven extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma (σ) factors that regulate functions important for survival under conditions eliciting cell envelope stress. Of these, four have been studied in detail: σ^M, σ^W, σ^X and σ^V. These four σ factors recognize overlapping sets of promoters, although the sequences that determine this overlapping recognition are incompletely understood. A major role in promoter selectivity has been ascribed to the core −10 and −35 promoter elements. Here, we demonstrate that a homopolymeric T-tract motif, proximal to the −35 element, functions in combination with the core promoter sequences to determine selectivity for ECF sigma factors. This motif is most critical for promoter activation by σ^V, and contributes variably to activation by σ^M, σ^X and σ^W. We propose that this motif, which is a feature of the deduced promoter consensus for a subset of ECF σ factors from many species, imparts intrinsic DNA curvature to influence promoter activity. The differential effect of this region among ECF σ factors thereby provides a mechanism to modulate the nature and extent of regulon overlap.

Transcription Initiation by Mix and Match Elements: Flexibility for Polymerase Binding to Bacterial Promoters

Bacterial RNA polymerase is composed of a core of subunits (β β′, α1, α2, ω), which have RNA synthesizing activity, and a specificity factor (σ), which identifies the start of transcription by recognizing and binding to sequence elements within promoter DNA. Four core promoter consensus sequences, the –10 element, the extended –10 (TGn) element, the –35 element, and the UP elements, have been known for many years; the importance of a nontemplate G at position -5 has been recognized more recently. However, the functions of these elements are not the same. The AT-rich UP elements, the –35 elements (–35TTGACA–30), and the extended –10 (15TGn–13) are recognized as double-stranded binding elements, whereas the –5 nontemplate G is recognized in the context of single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble. Furthermore, the –10 element (–12TATAAT–7) is recognized as both double-stranded DNA for the T:A bp at position –12 and as nontemplate, single-stranded DNA from positions –11 to –7. The single-stranded sequences at positions –11 to –7 as well as the –5 contribute to later steps in transcription initiation that involve isomerization of polymerase and separation of the promoter DNA around the transcription start site. Recent work has demonstrated that the double-stranded elements may be used in various combinations to yield an effective promoter. Thus, while some minimal number of contacts is required for promoter function, polymerase allows the elements to be mixed and matched. Interestingly, which particular elements are used does not appear to fundamentally alter the transcription bubble generated in the stable complex. In this review, we discuss the multiple steps involved in forming a transcriptionally competent polymerase/promoter complex, and we examine what is known about polymerase recognition of core promoter elements. We suggest that considering promoter elements according to their involvement in early (polymerase binding) or later (polymerase isomerization) steps in transcription initiation rather than simply from their match to conventional promoter consensus sequences is a more instructive form of promoter classification.

The Borrelia burgdorferi telomere resolvase, ResT, possesses ATP-dependent DNA unwinding activity

Spirochetes of the genus Borrelia possess unusual genomes harboring multiple linear and circular replicons. The linear replicons are terminated by covalently closed hairpin (hp) telomeres. Hairpin telomeres are formed from replicated intermediates by the telomere resolvase, ResT, in a phosphoryl transfer reaction with mechanistic similarities to those promoted by type 1B topoisomerases and tyrosine recombinases. There is growing evidence that ResT is multifunctional. Upon ResT depletion DNA replication unexpectedly ceases. Additionally, ResT possesses RecO-like biochemical activities being able to promote single-strand annealing on both free ssDNA and ssDNA complexed with cognate single-stranded DNA binding protein. We report here that ResT possesses DNA-dependent ATPase activity that promotes DNA unwinding with a 3΄-5΄ polarity. ResT can unwind a variety of substrates including synthetic replication forks and D-loops. We demonstrate that ResT's twin activities of DNA unwinding and annealing can drive regression of a model replication fork. These properties are similar to those of the RecQ helicase of the RecF pathway involved in DNA gap repair. We propose that ResT's combination of activities implicates it in replication and recombination processes operating on the linear chromosome and plasmids of Borrelia burgdorferi.

A Novel Spiro-Heterocyclic Compound Identified by the Silkworm Infection Model Inhibits Transcription in Staphylococcus aureus

Synthetic compounds are a vital source of antimicrobial agents. To uncover therapeutically effective antimicrobial agents from a chemical library, we screened over 100,000 synthetic compounds for in vitro antimicrobial activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and evaluated the in vivo therapeutic effectiveness of the hits in S. aureus-infected silkworms. Three antimicrobial agents exhibited therapeutic effects in the silkworm infection model. One of these, GPI0363, a novel spiro-heterocyclic compound, was bacteriostatic and inhibited RNA synthesis in S. aureus cells. GPI0363-resistant S. aureus strains harbored a point mutation in the gene encoding the primary sigma factor, SigA, of RNA polymerase, and this mutation was responsible for the resistance to GPI0363. We further revealed that GPI0363 could bind to SigA, inhibit promoter-specific transcription in vitro, and prolong the survival of mice infected with methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Thus, GPI0363 is an attractive candidate therapeutic agent against drug-resistant S. aureus infections.

Use of RNA polymerase molecular beacon assay to measure RNA polymerase interactions with model promoter fragments

RNA polymerase-promoter interactions that keep the transcription initiation complex together are complex and multipartite, and formation of the RNA polymerase-promoter complex proceeds through multiple intermediates. Short promoter fragments can be used as a tool to dissect RNA polymerase-promoter interactions and to pinpoint elements responsible for specific properties of the entire promoter complex. A recently developed fluorometric molecular beacon assay allows one to monitor the enzyme interactions with various DNA probes and quantitatively characterize partial RNA polymerase-promoter interactions. Here, we present detailed protocols for the preparation of an Escherichia coli molecular beacon and its application to study RNA polymerase interactions with model promoter fragments.

Spring loading a pre-cleavage intermediate for hairpin telomere formation

The Borrelia telomere resolvase, ResT, forms the unusual hairpin telomeres of the linear Borrelia replicons in a process referred to as telomere resolution. Telomere resolution is a DNA cleavage and rejoining reaction that proceeds from a replicated telomere intermediate in a reaction with mechanistic similarities to that catalyzed by type IB topoisomerases. Previous reports have implicated the hairpin-binding module, at the end of the N-terminal domain of ResT, in distorting the DNA between the scissile phosphates so as to promote DNA cleavage and hairpin formation by the catalytic domain. We report that unwinding the DNA between the scissile phosphates, prior to DNA cleavage, is a key cold-sensitive step in telomere resolution. Through the analysis of ResT mutants, rescued by substrate modifications that mimic DNA unwinding between the cleavage sites, we show that formation and/or stabilization of an underwound pre-cleavage intermediate depends upon cooperation of the hairpin-binding module and catalytic domain. The phenotype of the mutants argues that the pre-cleavage intermediate promotes strand ejection to favor the forward reaction and that subsequent hairpin capture is a reversible reaction step. These reaction features are proposed to promote hairpin formation over strand resealing while allowing reversal back to substrate of aborted reactions.

RNA polymerase molecular beacon as tool for studies of RNA polymerase-promoter interactions

The molecular details of formation of transcription initiation complex upon the interaction of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) with promoters are not completely understood. One way to address this problem is to understand how RNAP interacts with different parts of promoter DNA. A recently developed fluorometric RNAP molecular beacon assay allows one to monitor the RNAP interactions with various unlabeled DNA probes and quantitatively characterize partial RNAP-promoter interactions. This paper focuses on methodological aspects of application of this powerful assay to study the mechanism of transcription initiation complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase σ(70) holoenzyme and its regulation by bacterial and phage encoded factors.

Base flipping in open complex formation at bacterial promoters

In the process of transcription initiation, the bacterial RNA polymerase binds double-stranded (ds) promoter DNA and subsequently effects strand separation of 12 to 14 base pairs (bp), including the start site of transcription, to form the so-called "open complex" (also referred to as RP(o)). This complex is competent to initiate RNA synthesis. Here we will review the role of σ70 and its homologs in the strand separation process, and evidence that strand separation is initiated at the -11A (the A of the non-template strand that is 11 bp upstream from the transcription start site) of the promoter. By using the fluorescent adenine analog, 2-aminopurine, it was demonstrated that the -11A on the non-template strand flips out of the DNA helix and into a hydrophobic pocket where it stacks with tyrosine 430 of σ70. Open complexes are remarkably stable, even though in vivo, and under most experimental conditions in vitro, dsDNA is much more stable than its strand-separated form. Subsequent structural studies of other researchers have confirmed that in the open complex the -11A has flipped into a hydrophobic pocket of σ70. It was also revealed that RPo was stabilized by three additional bases of the non-template strand being flipped out of the helix and into hydrophobic pockets, further preventing re-annealing of the two complementary DNA strands.

Extra Cytoplasmic Function sigma factors, recent structural insights into promoter recognition and regulation

Bacterial transcription initiation is controlled by sigma factors, the RNA polymerase (RNAP) subunits responsive for promoter specificity. While the primary sigma factor ensures the bulk of transcription during growth, a major strategy used by bacteria to regulate gene expression consists of modifying the RNAP promoter specificity by means of alternative sigma factors. Among these factors, Extra Cytoplasmic Function sigma factors (σ(ECF)) constitute the most abundant group and are generally kept inactive by specific anti-sigma factors that are directly or indirectly sensitive to environmental stimuli. When activated by anti-sigma factor release, σ(ECF) turn on the transcription of dedicated regulons, which trigger adaptive responses for the survival of the cell. Recent structural studies have deciphered the molecular basis for σ(ECF) promoter recognition and original regulatory mechanisms.

Characterization of the cryptic AV3 promoter of ageratum yellow vein virus in prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems

A cryptic prokaryotic promoter, designated AV3 promoter, has been previously identified in certain begomovirus genus, including ageratum yellow vein virus isolate NT (AYVV-NT). In this study, we demonstrated that the core nucleotides in the putative -10 and -35 boxes are necessary but not sufficient for promoter activity in Escherichia coli, and showed that AYVV-NT AV3 promoter could specifically interact with single-stranded DNA-binding protein and sigma 70 of E. coli involved in transcription. Several AYVV-NT-encoded proteins were found to increase the activity of AV3 promoter. The transcription start sites downstream to AV3 promoter were mapped to nucleotide positions 803 or 805 in E. coli, and 856 in Nicotiana benthamiana. The eukaryotic activity of AV3 promoter and the translatability of a short downstream open reading frame were further confirmed by using a green fluorescent protein reporter construct in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells. These results suggested that AV3 promoter might be a remnant of evolution that retained cryptic activity at present.

Bacterial sigma factors: a historical, structural, and genomic perspective

Transcription initiation is the crucial focal point of gene expression in prokaryotes. The key players in this process, sigma factors (σs), associate with the catalytic core RNA polymerase to guide it through the essential steps of initiation: promoter recognition and opening, and synthesis of the first few nucleotides of the transcript. Here we recount the key advances in σ biology, from their discovery 45 years ago to the most recent progress in understanding their structure and function at the atomic level. Recent data provide important structural insights into the mechanisms whereby σs initiate promoter opening. We discuss both the housekeeping σs, which govern transcription of the majority of cellular genes, and the alternative σs, which direct RNA polymerase to specialized operons in response to environmental and physiological cues. The review concludes with a genome-scale view of the extracytoplasmic function σs, the most abundant group of alternative σs.

Next generation sequencing-based parallel analysis of melting kinetics of 4096 variants of a bacterial promoter

Promoter melting by bacterial RNA polymerase is a key step in transcription initiation. We used a next generation sequencing (NGS) based approach to analyze in parallel promoter melting of all 4096 sequence variants of the 6 bp -10 promoter element. We used NGS read count for each sequence of a promoter library containing a randomized -10 sequence as an observable to determine relative enrichment of -10 element sequence variants at different time points of the promoter melting reaction. The analysis reinforced the dominating role of consensus bases at positions -11 and -7, demonstrated an enhanced preference for A at -11 among sequences exhibiting the fastest melting kinetics, and showed higher overall importance of the T at -7 compared to the A at -11 for efficient promoter melting. Sequences lacking the consensus bases at -7 or -11 could still melt fast if they contained compensatory base patterns at other positions. We observed a significant correlation between the duplex melting energy of -10 element and the kinetics of promoter melting that became more pronounced when the dominating base-specific interactions with RNAP were diminished. These observations indicate that promoter melting kinetics is determined by a combination of base-specific effects/interactions and sequence-dependent stability of DNA duplex with the former playing a dominating role. Our data show that NGS can provide a reliable, quantitative readout for a highly parallel analysis of DNA template sequence dependence of activities of proteins that bind or operate on a DNA template.

The σ70 region 1.2 regulates promoter escape by unwinding DNA downstream of the transcription start site

The mechanisms of abortive synthesis and promoter escape during initiation of transcription are poorly understood. Here, we show that, after initiation of RNA synthesis, non-specific interaction of σ⁷⁰ region 1.2, present in all σ⁷⁰ family factors, with the non-template strand around position −4 relative to the transcription start site facilitates unwinding of the DNA duplex downstream of the transcription start site. This leads to stabilization of short RNA products and allows their extension, i.e. promoter escape. We show that this activity of σ⁷⁰ region 1.2 is assisted by the β-lobe domain, but does not involve the β′-rudder or the β′-switch-2, earlier proposed to participate in promoter escape. DNA sequence independence of this function of σ⁷⁰ region 1.2 suggests that it may be conserved in all σ⁷⁰ family factors. Our results indicate that the abortive nature of initial synthesis is caused, at least in part, by failure to open the downstream DNA by the β-lobe and σ region 1.2.

Interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with artificial promoters, containing nonnucleotide spacers

To study the functional role of the spacer region between two consensus -10 and -35 elements of promoters, recognized by E. coli RNA polymerase, the model promoter-like DNA duplexes containing nonnucleotide inserts (mimicking 17-mer spacer) either in one or both strands, were constructed. The modified duplexes can form the heparin-resistant binary complexes with RNA polymerase. The DNA duplex with nonnucleotide insert in the template strand can specifically direct the synthesis of mRNA in the in vitro run-off transcription assays.

Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit

The key step in bacterial promoter opening is recognition of the -10 promoter element (T(-12)A(-11)T(-10)A(-9)A(-8)T(-7) consensus sequence) by the RNA polymerase σ subunit. We determined crystal structures of σ domain 2 bound to single-stranded DNA bearing-10 element sequences. Extensive interactions occur between the protein and the DNA backbone of every -10 element nucleotide. Base-specific interactions occur primarily with A(-11) and T(-7), which are flipped out of the single-stranded DNA base stack and buried deep in protein pockets. The structures, along with biochemical data, support a model where the recognition of the -10 element sequence drives initial promoter opening as the bases of the nontemplate strand are extruded from the DNA double-helix and captured by σ. These results provide a detailed structural basis for the critical roles of A(-11) and T(-7) in promoter melting and reveal important insights into the initiation of transcription bubble formation.

A new basal promoter element recognized by RNA polymerase core enzyme

This study contributes to the understanding of gene-specific transcription by identifying a new promoter element that is contacted directly by an evolutionarily conserved loop within the largest subunit of the core RNA polymerase

Bacterial promoters are recognized by RNA polymerase (RNAP) σ subunit, which specifically interacts with the −10 and −35 promoter elements. Here, we provide evidence that the β′ zipper, an evolutionarily conserved loop of the largest subunit of RNAP core, interacts with promoter spacer, a DNA segment that separates the −10 and −35 promoter elements, and facilitates the formation of stable closed promoter complex. Depending on the spacer sequence, the proposed interaction of the β′ zipper with the spacer can also facilitate open promoter complex formation and even substitute for interactions of the σ subunit with the −35 element. These results suggest that there exists a novel class of promoters that rely on interaction of the β′ zipper with promoter spacer, along with or instead of interactions of σ subunit with the −35 element, for their activity. Finally, our data suggest that sequence-dependent interactions of the β′ zipper with DNA can contribute to promoter-proximal σ-dependent RNAP pausing, a recently recognized important step of transcription control.

Promoter spacer DNA plays an active role in integrating the functional consequences of RNA polymerase contacts with -10 and -35 promoter elements

Bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) interacts with conserved -10 and -35 promoter elements to recognize the promoter and to form an open complex in which DNA duplex around transcription start site melts. Using model DNA constructs (fork junction DNA) that mimic DNA structure found in the open complex we observed that the consequences of mutations in -10 promoter element for RNAP binding exhibited a striking dependence on the presence or absence of a functional -35 promoter element. A role of spacer DNA (a non-conserved DNA sequence connecting -10 and -35 promoter elements) in this phenomenon was probed with a series of fork junction DNA constructs containing perturbations to the spacer DNA. In the absence of a physical connection between the -10 and -35 DNA elements, or when -10 and -35 DNA elements were connected by a long flexible non-DNA linker, the dependence of RNAP interactions with -10 element on the strength of -35 element was lost. When these DNA elements were linked by a rigid DNA duplex or by a DNA duplex containing a short single-stranded gap, the coupling between the -10 and -35 binding activities was observed. These results indicated that promoter spacer DNA played an active role in integrating the functional consequences of RNA polymerase contacts with -10 and -35 promoter element. This role likely involves physical deformation of the spacer occurring in parallel with promoter melting as shown by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) experiments with the probes incorporated into spacer DNA.

A critical role of downstream RNA polymerase-promoter interactions in the formation of initiation complex

Nucleation of promoter melting in bacteria is coupled with RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to a conserved -10 promoter element located at the upstream edge of the transcription bubble. The mechanism of downstream propagation of the transcription bubble to include the transcription start site is unclear. Here we introduce new model downstream fork junction promoter fragments that specifically bind RNAP and mimic the downstream segment of promoter complexes. We demonstrate that RNAP binding to downstream fork junctions is coupled with DNA melting around the transcription start point. Consequently, certain downstream fork junction probes can serve as transcription templates. Using a protein beacon fluorescent method, we identify structural determinants of affinity and transcription activity of RNAP-downstream fork junction complexes. Measurements of RNAP interaction with double-stranded promoter fragments reveal that the strength of RNAP interactions with downstream DNA plays a critical role in promoter opening and that the length of the downstream duplex must exceed a critical length for efficient formation of transcription competent open promoter complex.

Mechanism of bacterial transcription initiation: RNA polymerase - promoter binding, isomerization to initiation-competent open complexes, and initiation of RNA synthesis

Initiation of RNA synthesis from DNA templates by RNA polymerase (RNAP) is a multi-step process, in which initial recognition of promoter DNA by RNAP triggers a series of conformational changes in both RNAP and promoter DNA. The bacterial RNAP functions as a molecular isomerization machine, using binding free energy to remodel the initial recognition complex, placing downstream duplex DNA in the active site cleft and then separating the nontemplate and template strands in the region surrounding the start site of RNA synthesis. In this initial unstable "open" complex the template strand appears correctly positioned in the active site. Subsequently, the nontemplate strand is repositioned and a clamp is assembled on duplex DNA downstream of the open region to form the highly stable open complex, RP(o). The transcription initiation factor, σ(70), plays critical roles in promoter recognition and RP(o) formation as well as in early steps of RNA synthesis.

Rapid changes in gene expression: DNA determinants of promoter regulation by the concentration of the transcription initiating NTP in Bacillus subtilis

In bacteria, rapid changes in gene expression can be achieved by affecting the activity of RNA polymerase with small molecule effectors during transcription initiation. An important small molecule effector is the initiating nucleoside triphosphate (iNTP). At some promoters, an increasing iNTP concentration stimulates promoter activity, while a decreasing concentration has the opposite effect. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) promoters from Gram-positive Bacillus subtilis are regulated by the concentration of their iNTP. Yet, the sequences of these promoters do not emulate the sequence characteristics of [iNTP]-regulated rRNA promoters of Gram-negative Escherichia coli. Here, we identified the 3′-promoter region, corresponding to the transcription bubble, as key for B. subtilis rRNA promoter regulation via the concentration of the iNTP. Within this region, the conserved −5T (3 bp downstream from the −10 hexamer) is required for this regulation. Moreover, we identified a second class of [iNTP]-regulated promoters in B. subtilis where the sequence determinants are not limited to the transcription bubble region. Overall, it seems that various sequence combinations can result in promoter regulation by [iNTP] in B. subtilis. Finally, this study demonstrates how the same type of regulation can be achieved with strikingly different promoter sequences in phylogenetically distant species.

DNA-binding properties of the Bacillus subtilis and Aeribacillus pallidus AC6 σ(D) proteins

σ(D) proteins from Aeribacillus pallidus AC6 and Bacillus subtilis bound specifically, albeit weakly, to promoter DNA even in the absence of core RNA polymerase. Binding required a conserved CG motif within the -10 element, and this motif is known to be recognized by σ region 2.4 and critical for promoter activity.

The transcription inhibitor lipiarmycin blocks DNA fitting into the RNA polymerase catalytic site

Worldwide spreading of drug-resistant pathogens makes mechanistic understanding of antibiotic action an urgent task. The macrocyclic antibiotic lipiarmycin (Lpm), which is under development for clinical use, inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) by an unknown mechanism. Using genetic and biochemical approaches, we show that Lpm targets the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 and the RNAP beta' subunit switch-2 element, which controls the clamping of promoter DNA in the RNAP active-site cleft. Lpm abolishes isomerization of the 'closed'-promoter complex to the transcriptionally competent 'open' complex and blocks sigma(70)-stimulated RNA synthesis on promoter-less DNA templates. Lpm activity decreases when the template DNA strand is stabilized at the active site through the interaction of RNAP with the nascent RNA chain. Template DNA-strand fitting into the RNAP active-site cleft directed by the beta' subunit switch-2 element and the sigma(70) subunit region 3.2 is essential for promoter melting and for de novo initiation of RNA synthesis, and our results suggest that Lpm impedes this process.

Probing DNA binding, DNA opening, and assembly of a downstream clamp/jaw in Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lambdaP(R) promoter complexes using salt and the physiological anion glutamate

Transcription by all RNA polymerases (RNAPs) requires a series of large-scale conformational changes to form the transcriptionally competent open complex RP(o). At the lambdaP(R) promoter, Escherichia coli sigma(70) RNAP first forms a wrapped, closed 100 bp complex I(1). The subsequent step opens the entire DNA bubble, creating the relatively unstable (open) complex I(2). Additional conformational changes convert I(2) to the stable RP(o). Here we probe these events by dissecting the effects of Na(+) salts of Glu(-), F(-), and Cl(-) on each step in this critical process. Rapid mixing and nitrocellulose filter binding reveal that the binding constant for I(1) at 25 degrees C is approximately 30-fold larger in Glu(-) than in Cl(-) at the same Na(+) concentration, with the same log-log salt concentration dependence for both anions. In contrast, both the rate constant and equilibrium constant for DNA opening (I(1) to I(2)) are only weakly dependent on salt concentration, and the opening rate constant is insensitive to replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-). These very small effects of salt concentration on a process (DNA opening) that is strongly dependent on salt concentration in solution may indicate that the backbones of both DNA strands interact with polymerase throughout the process and/or that compensation is present between ion uptake and release. Replacement of Cl(-) with Glu(-) or F(-) at 25 degrees C greatly increases the lifetime of RP(o) and greatly reduces its salt concentration dependence. By analogy to Hofmeister salt effects on protein folding, we propose that the excluded anions Glu(-) and F(-) drive the folding and assembly of the RNAP clamp/jaw domains in the conversion of I(2) to RP(o), while Cl(-) does not. Because the Hofmeister effect of Glu(-) or F(-) largely compensates for the destabilizing Coulombic effect of any salt on the binding of this assembly to downstream promoter DNA, RP(o) remains long-lived even at 0.5 M Na(+) in Glu(-) or F(-) salts. The observation that Esigma(70) RP(o) complexes are exceedingly long-lived at moderate to high Glu(-) concentrations argues that Esigma(70) RNAP does not dissociate from strong promoters in vivo when the cytoplasmic glutamate concentration increases during osmotic stress.

Comparison of promoter-specific events during transcription initiation in mycobacteria

DNA-protein interactions that occur during transcription initiation play an important role in regulating gene expression. To initiate transcription, RNA polymerase (RNAP) binds to promoters in a sequence-specific fashion. This is followed by a series of steps governed by the equilibrium binding and kinetic rate constants, which in turn determine the overall efficiency of the transcription process. We present here the first detailed kinetic analysis of promoter-RNAP interactions during transcription initiation in the sigma(A)-dependent promoters P(rrnAPCL1), P(rrnB) and P(gyr) of Mycobacterium smegmatis. The promoters show comparable equilibrium binding affinity but differ significantly in open complex formation, kinetics of isomerization and promoter clearance. Furthermore, the two rrn promoters exhibit varied kinetic properties during transcription initiation and appear to be subjected to different modes of regulation. In addition to distinct kinetic patterns, each one of the housekeeping promoters studied has its own rate-limiting step in the initiation pathway, indicating the differences in their regulation.

Conformational flexibility of sigma(70) in anti-terminator loading

In promoter DNA, the preferred distance of the -10 and -35 elements for interacting with RNA polymerase-bound sigma(70) is 17 bp. However, the Devi et al. paper in this issue of Molecular Microbiology demonstrates that when the C-terminal domain of sigma(70), including the 3.2 linker, is not attached to the core enzyme, distances between 0 and 3 bp can be accommodated. This attests to the great flexibility of the 3.2 linker. The particularly stable complex with the 2 bp separation may lend itself to structural studies of an early elongation complex containing sigma(70).

Mitochondrial transcription factor Mtf1 traps the unwound non-template strand to facilitate open complex formation

The catalytic subunit of the mitochondrial (mt) RNA polymerase (RNAP) is highly homologous to the bacteriophage T7/T3 RNAP. Unlike the phage RNAP, however, the mtRNAP relies on accessory proteins to initiate promoter-specific transcription. Rpo41, the catalytic subunit of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae mtRNAP, requires Mtf1 for opening the duplex promoter. To elucidate the role of Mtf1 in promoter-specific DNA opening, we have mapped the structural organization of the mtRNAP using site-specific protein-DNA photo-cross-linking studies. Both Mtf1 and Rpo41 cross-linked to distinct sites on the promoter DNA, but the dominant cross-links were those of the Mtf1, which indicates a direct role of Mtf1 in promoter-specific binding and initiation. Strikingly, Mtf1 cross-linked with a high efficiency to the melted region of the promoter DNA, based on which we suggest that Mtf1 facilitates DNA melting by trapping the non-template strand in the unwound conformation. Additional strong cross-links of the Mtf1 were observed with the -8 to -10 base-paired region of the promoter. The cross-linking results were incorporated into a structural model of the mtRNAP-DNA, created from a homology model of the C-terminal domain of Rpo41 and the available structure of Mtf1. The promoter DNA is sandwiched between Mtf1 and Rpo41 in the structural model, and Mtf1 closely associates mainly with one face of the promoter across the entire nona-nucleotide consensus sequence. Overall, the studies reveal that in many ways the role of Mtf1 is analogous to the transcription factors of the multisubunit RNAPs, which provides an intriguing link between single- and multisubunit RNAPs.

Reduced capacity of alternative sigmas to melt promoters ensures stringent promoter recognition

In bacteria, multiple sigmas direct RNA polymerase to distinct sets of promoters. Housekeeping sigmas direct transcription from thousands of promoters, whereas most alternative sigmas are more selective, recognizing more highly conserved promoter motifs. For sigma(32) and sigma(28), two Escherichia coli Group 3 sigmas, altering a few residues in Region 2.3, the portion of sigma implicated in promoter melting, to those universally conserved in housekeeping sigmas relaxed their stringent promoter requirements and significantly enhanced melting of suboptimal promoters. All Group 3 sigmas and the more divergent Group 4 sigmas have nonconserved amino acids at these positions and rarely transcribe >100 promoters. We suggest that the balance of "melting" and "recognition" functions of sigmas is critical to setting the stringency of promoter recognition. Divergent sigmas may generally use a nonoptimal Region 2.3 to increase promoter stringency, enabling them to mount a focused response to altered conditions.

Purification of RNA polymerase from mycobacteria for optimized promoter-polymerase interactions

In vitro transcription analysis is important to understand the mechanism of transcription. Various assays for the analysis of initiation, elongation and termination form the basis for better understanding of the process. Purified RNA polymerase (RNAP) with high specific activity is necessary to carry out variety of these specific reactions. The RNAP purified from Mycobacterium smegmatis from exponential phase showed low promoter specificity in promoter-polymerase interaction studies. This is due to the presence of a large number of sigma factors during exponential phase and under-representation of sigma(A) required for house-keeping transcription. We describe an in vivo reconstitution of RNAP holoenzyme with sigma(A) and its purification, which resulted in holoenzyme with stoichiometric sigma(A) content. The reconstituted holoenzyme showed enhanced promoter-specific binding and promoter-specific-transcription activity compared to the enzyme isolated using standard procedure. Such in vivo reconstitution of stoichiometric holoenzyme could facilitate promoter-specific transcription assays, especially in organisms which encode a large number of sigma factors.

DNA melting by RNA polymerase at the T7A1 promoter precedes the rate-limiting step at 37 degrees C and results in the accumulation of an off-pathway intermediate

The formation of a transcriptionally active complex by RNA polymerase involves a series of short-lived structural intermediates where protein conformational changes are coupled to DNA wrapping and melting. We have used time-resolved KMnO₄ and hydroxyl-radical X-ray footprinting to directly probe conformational signatures of these complexes at the T7A1 promoter. Here we demonstrate that DNA melting from m12 to m4 precedes the rate-limiting step in the pathway and takes place prior to the formation of full downstream contacts. In addition, on the wild-type promoter, we can detect the accumulation of a stable off-pathway intermediate that results from the absence of sequence-specific contacts with the melted non-consensus –10 region. Finally, the comparison of the results obtained at 37°C with those at 20°C reveals significant differences in the structure of the intermediates resulting in a different pathway for the formation of a transcriptionally active complex.

Dissection of recognition determinants of Escherichia coli sigma32 suggests a composite -10 region with an 'extended -10' motif and a core -10 element

Sigma32 controls expression of heat shock genes in Escherichia coli and is widely distributed in proteobacteria. The distinguishing feature of sigma32 promoters is a long -10 region (CCCCATNT) whose tetra-C motif is important for promoter activity. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis of sigma32 and in vivo and in vitro assays, we identified promoter recognition determinants of this motif. The most downstream C (-13) is part of the -10 motif; our work confirms and extends recognition determinants of -13C. Most importantly, our work suggests that the two upstream Cs (-16, -15) constitute an 'extended -10' recognition motif that is recognized by K130, a residue universally conserved in beta- and gamma-proteobacteria. This residue is located in the alpha-helix of sigmaDomain 3 that mediates recognition of the extended -10 promoter motif in other sigmas. K130 is not conserved in alpha- and delta-/epsilon-proteobacteria and we found that sigma32 from the alpha-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus does not need the extended -10 motif for high promoter activity. This result supports the idea that K130 mediates extended -10 recognition. Sigma32 is the first Group 3 sigma shown to use the 'extended -10' recognition motif.

RNA polymerase: a nexus of gene regulation

In Bacteria, transcription is catalyzed by a single RNA polymerase (RNAP) whose promoter selectivity and activity is governed by a wide variety of transcription factors. The net effect of these transcriptional regulators is to determine which genes are transcribed, and at what levels, under any specific growth condition. RNAP thus serves as a nexus of gene regulation that integrates the information coming from a variety of sensory systems to appropriately modulate gene expression. The techniques presented in this volume provide a set of tools and approaches for investigating the factors controlling RNAP activity at both individual promoters and on a genomic scale. This introductory chapter provides a brief overview of RNAP and the transcription cycle and introduces general principles of how the fundamental steps of transcription are influenced by both DNA (promoter) sequences and trans-acting factors.

Fluorescence mapping of the open complex of yeast mitochondrial RNA polymerase

The mitochondrial RNA polymerase (mtRNAP) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, consisting of a complex of Rpo41 and Mtf1, is homologous to the phage single polypeptide T7/T3 RNA polymerases. The yeast mtRNAP recognizes a conserved nonanucleotide sequence to initiate specific transcription. In this work, we have defined the region of the nonanucleotide that is melted by the mtRNAP using 2-aminopurine (2AP) fluorescence that is sensitive to changes in base stacking interactions. We show that mtRNAP spontaneously melts the promoter from -4 to +2 forming a bubble around the transcription start site at +1. The location and size of the DNA bubble in this open complex of the mtRNAP closely resembles that of the T7 RNA polymerase. We show that DNA melting requires the simultaneous presence of Rpo41 and Mtf1. Adding the initiating nucleotide ATP does not expand the size of the initially melted DNA, but the initiating nucleotide differentially affects base stacking interactions at -1 and -2. Thus, the promoter structure upstream of the transcription start site is slightly rearranged during early initiation from its structure in the pre-initiation stage. Unlike on the duplex promoter, Rpo41 alone was able to form a competent open complex on a pre-melted promoter. The results indicate that Rpo41 contains the elements for recognizing the melted promoter through interactions with the template strand. We propose that Mtf1 plays a role in base pair disruption during the early stages of open complex formation.

Analysis of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation

Bacterial promoter identification and characterization is not as straightforward as one might presume. Promoters vary widely in their similarity to the consensus recognition element sequences, in their activities, and in their utilization of transcription factors, and multiple approaches often must be used to provide a framework for understanding promoter regulation. Characterization of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation in the absence of additional regulatory factors (basal promoter function) can provide a basis for understanding the steps in transcription initiation that are ultimately targeted by nutritional or environmental factors. Promoters can be localized using genetic approaches in vivo, but the detailed properties of the RNAP-promoter complex are studied most productively in vitro. We first describe approaches for identification of bacterial promoters and transcription start sites in vivo, including promoter-reporter fusions and primer-extension. We then describe a number of methods for characterization of RNAP-promoter complexes in vitro, including in vitro transcription, gel mobility shift assays, footprinting, and filter binding. Utilization of these methods can result in determination of not only basal promoter strength but also the rates of transcription initiation complex formation and decay.

Evidence for a tyrosine-adenine stacking interaction and for a short-lived open intermediate subsequent to initial binding of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase to promoter DNA

Bacterial RNA polymerase and a "sigma" transcription factor form an initiation-competent "open" complex at a promoter by disruption of about 14 base pairs. Strand separation is likely initiated at the highly conserved -11 A-T base pair. Amino acids in conserved region 2.3 of the main Escherichia coli sigma factor, sigma(70), are involved in this process, but their roles are unclear. To monitor the fates of particular bases upon addition of RNA polymerase, promoters bearing single substitutions of the fluorescent A-analog 2-aminopurine (2-AP) at -11 and two other positions in promoter DNA were examined. Evidence was obtained for an open intermediate on the pathway to open complex formation, in which these 2-APs are no longer stacked onto their neighboring bases. The tyrosine at residue 430 in region 2.3 of sigma(70) was shown to be involved in quenching the fluorescence of a 2-AP substituted at -11, presumably through a stacking interaction. These data refine the structural model for open complex formation and reveal a novel interaction involved in DNA melting by RNA polymerase.

The RNA polymerase "switch region" is a target for inhibitors

The alpha-pyrone antibiotic myxopyronin (Myx) inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). Here, through a combination of genetic, biochemical, and structural approaches, we show that Myx interacts with the RNAP "switch region"--the hinge that mediates opening and closing of the RNAP active center cleft--to prevent interaction of RNAP with promoter DNA. We define the contacts between Myx and RNAP and the effects of Myx on RNAP conformation and propose that Myx functions by interfering with opening of the RNAP active-center cleft during transcription initiation. We further show that the structurally related alpha-pyrone antibiotic corallopyronin (Cor) and the structurally unrelated macrocyclic-lactone antibiotic ripostatin (Rip) function analogously to Myx. The RNAP switch region is distant from targets of previously characterized RNAP inhibitors, and, correspondingly, Myx, Cor, and Rip do not exhibit crossresistance with previously characterized RNAP inhibitors. The RNAP switch region is an attractive target for identification of new broad-spectrum antibacterial therapeutic agents.

Energetic contributions to the initiation of transcription in E. coli

The thermodynamics of RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding to a 108 base pair (bp) synthetic promoter with consensus sequences at the -35 and -10 bp binding regions upstream from the transcription start point were determined using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The binding constant at 25 degrees C is 2.37+/-0.18x10(7) M(-1), which is reduced to 0.17+/-0.06x10(7) M(-1) with mutations in the -10 bp region but remained the same with mutations in the -35 binding region. The binding reactions were enthalpically-driven with exothermic binding enthalpies ranging from -57+/-6 kJ mol(-1) at 15 degrees C to -271+/-20 kJ mol(-1) at 35 degrees C yielding a large binding heat capacity change of -10.7+/-1.9 kJ mol(-1) K(-1), indicating a conformational change upon binding to the RNAP. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) scans of the thermal unfolding of RNAP and the promoter-RNAP complex exhibited an unfolding transition at 55.5+/-0.6 degrees C and at 58.9+/-0.5 degrees C for the RNAP but only one transition at 60.5+/-1.1 degrees C for the complex with van't Hoff enthalpy to transition enthalpy ratios of, resp., 3.2+/-0.3 and 4.3+/-0.5. The single transition of the complex results from a shift to 60.5 degrees C of the low temperature transition upon promoter binding to the structural unit unfolding at the lower temperature in RNAP. The large transition enthalpy ratios indicate that the sigma, alpha, alpha, beta, and beta' subunits unfold as almost independent entities. The dissociation thermodynamics of short transcription "bubble" duplexes of 7 promoters sequenced from -1 to -12 bp were determined from ITC and DSC measurements. The free energy change of the promoter binding to the RNAP and the free energy requirement for formation of the transcription bubble at the low promoter concentrations in the cell are sufficient to drive the initiation of transcription through the isomerization of the closed to the open form step of the RNAP-promoter complex.

Formation of an RNA polymerase II preinitiation complex on an RNA promoter derived from the hepatitis delta virus RNA genome

Although RNA polymerases (RNAPs) are able to use RNA as template, it is unknown how they recognize RNA promoters. In this study, we used an RNA fragment derived from the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) genome as a model to investigate the recognition of RNA promoters by RNAP II. Inhibition of the transcription reaction using an antibody specific to the largest subunit of RNAP II and the direct binding of purified RNAP II to the RNA promoter confirmed the involvement of RNAP II in the reaction. RNA affinity chromatography established that an active RNAP II preinitiation complex forms on the RNA promoter and indicated that this complex contains the core RNAP II subunit and the general transcription factors TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH and TFIIS. Binding assays demonstrated the direct binding of the TATA-binding protein and suggested that this protein is required to nucleate the RNAP II complex on the RNA promoter. Our findings provide a better understanding of the events leading to RNA promoter recognition by RNAP II.

Advances in bacterial promoter recognition and its control by factors that do not bind DNA

Early work identified two promoter regions, the -10 and -35 elements, that interact sequence specifically with bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP). However, we now know that several additional promoter elements contact RNAP and influence transcription initiation. Furthermore, our picture of promoter control has evolved beyond one in which regulation results solely from activators and repressors that bind to DNA sequences near the RNAP binding site: many important transcription factors bind directly to RNAP without binding to DNA. These factors can target promoters by affecting specific kinetic steps on the pathway to open complex formation, thereby regulating RNA output from specific promoters.

Fine structure of the promoter-sigma region 1.2 interaction

We recently proposed that a nontemplate strand base in the discriminator region of bacterial promoters, the region between the -10 element and the transcription start site, makes sequence-specific contacts to region 1.2 of the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP). Because rRNA promoters contain sequences within the discriminator region that are suboptimal for interaction with sigma1.2, these promoters have the kinetic properties required for regulation by the RNAP-binding factors DksA and ppGpp. Here, we use zero-length cross-linking and mutational, kinetic, and footprinting studies to map RNAP interactions with the nontemplate strand bases at the junction of the -10 element and the discriminator region in an unregulated rRNA promoter variant and in the lambdaP(R) promoter. Our studies indicate that nontemplate strand bases adjacent to the -10 element bind within a 9-aa interval in sigma1.2 (residues 99-107). We also demonstrate that the downstream-most base on the nontemplate strand of the -10 hexamer cross-links to sigma region 2, and not to sigma1.2. Our results refine models of RNAP-DNA interactions in the promoter complex that are crucial for regulation of transcription initiation.

Formation of the open complex by bacterial RNA polymerase--a quantitative model

Over the last two decades, a large amount of data on initiation of transcription by bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) has been obtained. However, a question of how the open complex is formed still remains open, and several qualitative hypotheses for opening of DNA by RNAP have been proposed. To provide a theoretical framework needed to analyze the assembled experimental data, we here develop the first quantitative model of the open complex formation by bacterial RNAP. We first show that a simple hypothesis (which might follow from recent bioinformatic and experimental results), by which promoter DNA is melted in one step through thermal fluctuations, is inconsistent with experimental data. We next consider a more complex two-step view of the open complex formation. According to this hypothesis, the transcription bubble is formed in the -10 region, and consequently extends to the transcription start site. We derive how the open complex formation rate depends on DNA duplex melting energy and on interaction energies of RNAP with promoter DNA in the closed and open complex. This relationship provides an explicit connection between transcription initiation rate and physical properties of the promoter sequence and promoter-RNAP interactions. We compare our model with both biochemical measurements and genomics data and report a very good agreement with the experiments, with no free parameters used in model testing. This agreement therefore strongly supports both the quantitative model that we propose and the qualitative hypothesis on which the model is based. From a practical point, our results allow efficient estimation of promoter kinetic parameters, as well as engineering of promoter sequences with the desired kinetic properties.

Threonine 429 of Escherichia coli sigma 70 is a key participant in promoter DNA melting by RNA polymerase

Initiation of transcription is an important target for regulation of gene expression. In bacteria, the formation of a transcription-competent complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves DNA strand separation over a stretch of about 14 base pairs. Aromatic and basic residues in conserved region 2.3 of Escherichia coli sigma(70) had been found to participate in this process, but it is still unclear which amino acid residues initiate it. Here we report an essential role for threonine (T) at position 429 of sigma(70): its substitution by alanine (T429A) results in the largest decrease in open complex formation yet observed for any single substitution in region 2.3. Promoter recognition itself is not affected by T429A substitution, thus providing evidence for a role of T429 in the strand-separation step. Our data are consistent with a model where the T429 would act as a competitor for the hydrogen bonding that stabilizes the highly conserved -11A-T base pairs of the promoter DNA, thus facilitating initiation of strand separation at this particular position in the -10 region. This model suggests an active role for RNA polymerase in disrupting the -11 base pair, rather than just capturing the -11A subsequent to spontaneous unpairing.

Effects of discontinuities in the DNA template on abortive initiation and promoter escape by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

Using singly gapped or nicked templates containing the T7A1 promoter, we have measured several kinetic parameters related to the process of transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, confirming and extending previous results using a population of randomly gapped templates. A reduced probability of transcript abortion at RNA lengths of 6 and 7 nucleotides and a lower ratio of abortive to productive initiation events was observed for some discontinuous templates, consistent with models attributing abortive initiation to the accumulation of strain in the initiating complex. The effect of DNA discontinuity on abortion of shorter RNA transcripts (2-3 nucleotides) was less pronounced; abortion at these short chain lengths may primarily be attributed to the low stability of the RNA-DNA hybrid. Certain discontinuities had significant effects on the intrinsic catalytic capacity of the open complex and also on the partitioning between productive and unproductive complexes, suggesting that subtle changes in the conformation of the open complex can profoundly affect its function. The rate and efficiency of promoter escape were not correlated with the stability of the open promoter complex despite previous suggestions to the contrary. We conclude that the stability of the open promoter complex is only one of several factors that contribute to the overall rate of promoter escape.

The -11A of promoter DNA and two conserved amino acids in the melting region of sigma70 both directly affect the rate limiting step in formation of the stable RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but they do not necessarily interact

Formation of the stable, strand separated, 'open' complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves DNA melting of approximately 14 base pairs. The likely nucleation site is the highly conserved -11A base in the non-template strand of the -10 promoter region. Amino acid residues Y430 and W433 on the sigma70 subunit of the RNA polymerase participate in the strand separation. The roles of -11A and of the Y430 and W433 were addressed by employing synthetic consensus promoters containing base analog and other substitutions at -11 in the non-template strand, and sigma70 variants bearing amino acid substitutions at positions 430 and 433. Substitutions for -11A and for Y430 and W433 in sigma70 have small or no effects on formation of the initial RNA polymerase-promoter complex, but exert their effects on subsequent steps on the way to formation of the open complex. As substitutions for Y430 and W433 also affect open complex formation on promoter DNA lacking the -11A base, it is concluded that these amino acid residues have other (or additional) roles, not involving the -11A. The effects of the substitutions at -11A of the promoter and Y430 and W433 of sigma70 are cumulative.

Strand opening-deficient Escherichia coli RNA polymerase facilitates investigation of closed complexes with promoter DNA: effects of DNA sequence and temperature

Formation of the strand-separated, open complex between RNA polymerase and a promoter involves several intermediates, the first being the closed complex in which the DNA is fully base-paired. This normally short lived complex has been difficult to study. We have used a mutant Escherichia coli RNA polymerase, deficient in promoter DNA melting, and variants of the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda to model the closed complex intermediate at physiologically relevant temperatures. Our results indicate that in the closed complex, RNA polymerase recognizes base pairs as double-stranded DNA even in the region that becomes single-stranded in the open complex. Additionally, a particular base pair in the -35 region engages in an important interaction with the RNA polymerase, and a DNase I-hypersensitive site, pronounced in the promoter DNA of the open complex, was not present. The effect of temperature on closed complex formation was found to be small over the temperature range from 15 to 37 degrees C. This suggests that low temperature complexes of wild type RNA polymerase and promoter DNA may adequately model the closed complex.