High-Spin (meso-Tetraalkylporphyrinato)iron(III) Complexes As Studied by X-ray Crystallography, EPR, and Dynamic NMR Spectroscopies

Effects of porphyrin deformation on the 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts in high-spin five- and six-coordinate manganese(III) porphyrin complexes

As an extension of our study to reveal the effect of porphyrin deformation on the [Formula: see text]C and 1H NMR chemical shifts, both five- and six-coordinate high-spin (S [Formula: see text] 2) Mn(III) complexes such as Mn(Por)Cl and [Mn(Por)(CD3OD)2]Cl have been prepared, where Por is a porphyrin dianion such as TPP, OMTPP, and T[Formula: see text]PrP. Molecular structures of five-coordinate Mn(OMTPP)Cl and Mn(TiPrP)Cl have been determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis. As expected, Mn(OMTPP)Cl and Mn(TiPrP)Cl have exhibited a highly saddled and highly ruffled porphyrin core, respectively. The [Formula: see text]C NMR spectra have revealed that these complexes generally exhibit the [Formula: see text]-pyrrole signals at the downfield positions and [Formula: see text]-pyrrole an. meso signals at the upfield positions. The results suggest that the spin polarization of Mn(III)–NP σ bonds, which occurs in all the high-spin Mn(III) complexes, is the major factor to determine the chemical shifts of the porphyrin carbon signals (Cheng, R.-J.; Chang, S.-H.; Hung, K.-C. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 46: 1948–1950). Although th. meso and [Formula: see text]-pyrrole signals are observed at the upfield and downfield positions, respectively, these signals are widely dispersed depending on the deformation mode of the porphyrin ring. The results have been explained in terms of the strong spin polarization of the Mn–NP bond together with the specific metal-porphyrin orbital interactions such as: (i) the a2u-dz2 interaction in five-coordinate complexes, (ii) the a2u-dxy interaction in ruffled complexes, and (iii) the a2u-dx2-y2 interaction in saddled complexes.

Probing the rotational dynamics of meso-(2-substituted)aryl substituents in A2B-type subporphyrins

A2 B-type B-methoxy subporphyrins 3 a-g and B-phenyl subporphyrins 7 a-c,e,g bearing meso-(2-substituted)aryl substituents are synthesized, and their rotational dynamics are examined through variable-temperature (VT) (1) H NMR spectroscopy. In these subporphyrins, the rotation of meso-aryl substituents is hindered by a rationally installed 2-substituent. The rotational barriers determined are considerably smaller than those reported previously for porphyrins. Comparison of the rotation activation parameters reveals a variable contribution of ΔH(≠) and ΔS(≠) in ΔG(≠). 2-Methyl and 2-ethyl groups of the meso-aryl substituents in subporphyrins 3 e, 3 f, and 7 e induce larger rotational barriers than 2-alkoxyl substituents. The rotational barriers of 3 g and 7 g are reduced by the presence of the 4-dibenzylamino group owing to its ability to stabilize the coplanar rotation transition state electronically. The smaller rotational barriers found for B-phenyl subporphyrins than for B-methoxy subporphyrins indicate a negligible contribution of SN 1-type heterolysis in the rotation of meso-aryl substituents.

Effect of the Ruffled Porphyrin Ring on Electronic Structures: Structure and Characterization of [Fe(TalkylP)(OClO3)] and [Fe(TPrP)(THF)2]ClO4 (alkyl = Ethyl, Et and n-Propyl, Pr)

We report the synthesis of Fe(TalkylP)(OClO3)] (alkyl = ethyl and propyl) and [Fe(TPrP)(THF)2]ClO4, which are characterized by UV-vis, EPR, X-ray crystallography, and solid-state magnetic susceptibilities. The macrocycles of all three complexes are ruffled, all of the structural features for [Fe(TEtP(OClO3)] and [Fe(TPrP)(OClO3)] are characteristic of the nearly pure S = 3/2 state, while the structural parameters for [Fe(TPrP)(THF)2]ClO4 feature a pure intermediate-spin (S = 3/2) state, which are all consistent with EPR and magnetic data. It is clear from these studies that the ruffled conformation plays a significant role in affecting the extent of S = 3/2 character.

Electronic structure of highly ruffled low-spin iron(III) porphyrinates with electron withdrawing heptafluoropropyl groups at the meso positions

Bis(pyridine)[meso-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphyrinato]iron(III), [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+), was reported to be the low-spin complex that adopts the purest (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state where the energy gap between the iron d(xy) and d(π)(d(xz), d(yz)) orbitals is larger than the corresponding energy gaps of any other complexes reported previously (Moore, K. T.; Fletcher, J. T.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5196-5209). Although the highly ruffled porphyrin core expected for this complex contributes to the stabilization of the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state, the strongly electron withdrawing C(3)F(7) groups at the meso positions should stabilize the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Thus, we have reexamined the electronic structure of [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+) by means of (1)H NMR, (19)F NMR, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The CD(2)Cl(2) solution of [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+) shows the pyrrole-H signal at -10.25 ppm (298 K) in (1)H NMR, the CF(2)(α) signal at -74.6 ppm (298 K) in (19)F NMR, and the large g(max) type signal at g = 3.16 (4.2 K) in the EPR. Thus, contrary to the previous report, the complex is unambiguously shown to adopt the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Comparison of the spectroscopic data of a series of [Fe(THFPrP)L(2)](+) with those of the corresponding meso-tetrapropylporphyrin complexes [Fe(TPrP)L(2)](+) with various axial ligands (L) has shown that the meso-C(3)F(7) groups stabilize the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Therefore, it is clear that the less common (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state can be stabilized by the three major factors: (i) axial ligand with low-lying π* orbitals, (ii) ruffled porphyrin ring, and (iii) electron donating substituent at the meso position.

Inter-Ring Interactions in [Fe(TalkylP)(Cl)] (alkyl = ethyl, n-propyl, n-hexyl) Complexes: Control by meso-Substituted Groups

Syntheses, molecular structures and magnetic susceptibilities of three meso-substituted high-spin iron(III) porphyrinate complexes ([Fe(TEtP)(Cl)], [Fe(TPrP)(Cl)], and [Fe(THexP)(Cl)]) are described. It was determined that the inter-ring interactions within each dimeric unit change upon alteration of the alkyl groups at the meso-positions. Magnetic exchange couplings between iron centers of the dimers are in accord with the trends in structural inter-ring geometries. Crystal data for [Fe(TEtP)(Cl)]: a = 10.1710(5) Å, b = 11.309(3) Å, c = 12.170(3) Å, α = 91.774(9) °, β = 113.170(14) °, γ = 112.149(9) °, V = 1165.2(4) Å(3), triclinic, P1̄, Z = 2, R(1) = 0.0844 and ωR(2) = 0.2073 for observed data. Crystal data for [Fe([Fe(TPrP)(Cl)])(Cl)]: a = 13.040(2) Å, b = 15.221(2) Å, c = 14.6681(9) Å, β = 109.997(11) °, V = 2735.9(7) Å(3), monoclinic, P2(1)/n, Z = 4, R(1) = 0.0477 and ωR(2) = 0.1176 for observed data. Crystal data for [Fe(THexP)(Cl)]: a = 10.246(7) Å, b = 12.834(4) Å, c = 17.420(15) Å, α = 69.74(3) °, β = 87.52(4) °, γ, = 84.89(3) °, V = 2140(2) Å(3), triclinic, P1̄, Z = 2, R(1) = 0.1024 and ωR(2) = 0.2659 for observed data.

Conformational Landscape of meso-(1,3-Dithian-2-yl)porphyrins

An investigation of the conformational landscape of 1,3-dithian-2-yl bearing porphyrins and the rotational behavior of the dithianyl substituents in meso position was carried out by variable-temperature (VT) NMR spectroscopy. Additionally, theoretical results for alternative conformations and energy barriers were obtained by molecular modeling. The study revealed different NH trans tautomers with regard to the orientation of the dithianyl ligands for the free base porphyrins 1-3. Relatively ruffled porphyrin core conformations were established for the transition states of the dithianyl rotation, resulting in a lower rotational energy barrier for the nickel(II) complex 4 compared to that of the free base systems. The data obtained and the first depiction of a rotational transition state for the rotation of bulky meso-alkyl substituents illustrate the close structural interplay between meso-alkyl substituents and the macrocycle conformation in porphyrins.

Electronic Structures of Six-Coordinate Ferric Porphyrin Complexes with Weak Axial Ligands: Usefulness of 13C NMR Chemical Shifts

1H NMR, (13)C NMR, and EPR spectra of six-coordinate ferric porphyrin complexes [Fe(Por)L2]ClO4 with different porphyrin structures are presented, where porphyrins (Por) are planar 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), ruffled 5,10,15,20-tetraisopropylporphyrin (TiPrP), and saddled 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrin (OETPP), and axial ligands (L) are weak oxygen ligands such as pyridine-N-oxide, substituted pyridine-N-oxide, DMSO, DMF, MeOH, THF, 2-MeTHF, and dioxane. These complexes exhibit the spin states ranging from an essentially pure high-spin (S = 5/2) to an essentially pure intermediate-spin (S = 3/2) state depending on the field strength of the axial ligands and the structure of the porphyrin rings. Reed and Guiset reported that the pyrrole-H chemical shift is a good probe to determine the spin state in the spin admixed S = 5/2,3/2 complexes (Reed, C. A.; Guiset, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3281-3282). In this paper, we report that the chemical shifts of the alpha- and beta-pyrrole carbons can also be good probes to determine the spin state because they have shown good correlation with those of the pyrrole-H or pyrrole-C(alpha). By putting the observed or assumed pyrrole-H or pyrrole-C(alpha) chemical shifts of the pure high-spin and pure intermediate-spin complexes into the correlation equations, we have estimated the carbon chemical shits of the corresponding complexes. The orbital interactions between iron(III) and porphyrin have been examined on the basis of these chemical shifts, from which we have found that both the d(xy)-a(2u) interaction in the ruffled Fe(T(i)PrP)L2+ and d(xy)-a(1u) interaction in the saddled Fe(OETPP)L2+ are quite weak in the high-spin and probably in the intermediate-spin complexes as well. Close inspection of the correlation lines has suggested that the electron configuration of an essentially pure intermediate-spin Fe(T(i)PrP)L2+ changes from (d(xy), d(yz))3(d(xy))1(d(z)2)1 to (d(xy))2(d(xz), d(yz))2(d(z)2)1 as the axial ligand (L) changes from DMF to MeOH, THF, 2-MeTHF, and then to dioxane. Although the DFT calculation has indicated that the highly saddled intermediate-spin Fe(OETPP)(THF)2+ should adopt (d(xy), d(yz))3(d(xy))1(d(z)2)1 rather than (d(xy))2(d(xz), d(yz))2(d(z)2)1 because of the strong d(xy)-a(1u) interaction (Cheng, R.-J.; Wang, Y.-K.; Chen, P.-Y.; Han, Y.-P.; Chang, C.-C. Chem. Commun. 2005, 1312-1314), our 13C NMR study again suggests that Fe(OETPP)(THF)2+ should be represented as (d(xy))2(d(xz), d(yz))2(d(z)2)1 because of the weak d(xy)-a(1u) interaction. The contribution of the S = 3/2 state in all types of the spin admixed S = 5/2,3/2 six-coordinate complexes has been determined on the basis of the (13)C NMR chemical shifts.

Electronic Structures of Five-Coordinate Iron(III) Porphyrin Complexes with Highly Ruffled Porphyrin Ring

The spin states of the iron(III) complexes with a highly ruffled porphyrin ring, [Fe(TEtPrP)X] where X = F-, Cl-, Br-, I-, and ClO4(-), have been examined by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, EPR, and Mössbauer spectroscopy. While the F-, Cl-, and Br- complexes adopt a high-spin (S = 5/2) state, the I- complex exhibits an admixed intermediate-spin (S = 5/2, 3/2) state in CD2Cl2 solution. The I- complex shows, however, a quite pure high-spin state in toluene solution as well as in the solid. The results contrast those of highly saddled [Fe(OETPP)X] where the I- complex exhibits an essentially pure intermediate-spin state both in solution and in the solid. In contrast to the halide-ligated complexes, the ClO4(-) complex shows a quite pure intermediate-spin state. The 13C NMR spectra of [Fe(TEtPrP)ClO4] are characterized by the downfield and upfield shifts of the meso and pyrrole-alpha carbon signals, respectively: delta(meso) = +342 and delta(alpha-py) = -287 ppm at 298 K. The data indicate that the meso carbon atoms of [Fe(TEtPrP)ClO4] have considerable amounts of positive spin, which in turn indicate that the iron has an unpaired electron in the d(xy) orbital; the unpaired electron in the d(xy) orbital is delocalized to the meso positions due to the iron(d(xy))-porphyrin(a(2u)) interaction. Similar results have been obtained in analogous [Fe(TiPrP)X] though the intermediate-spin character of [Fe(TiPrP)X] is much larger than that of the corresponding [Fe(TEtPrP)X]. On the basis of these results, we have concluded that the highly ruffled intermediate-spin complexes such as [Fe(TEtPrP)ClO4] and [Fe(TiPrP)ClO4] adopt a novel (d(xz), d(yz))3(d(xy))1(d(z)(2)1 electron configuration; the electron configuration of the intermediate-spin complexes reported previously is believed to be (d(xy))2(d(xz)), d(yz))2(d(z)(2))1.

Importance of the C-H...N weak hydrogen bonding on the coordination structures of manganese(III) porphyrin complexes

The reactions between Mn(Por)Cl and Bu(4)N(+)CN(-) have been examined in various solvents by UV-vis and (1)H NMR spectroscopy, where Por's are dianions of meso-tetraisopropylporphyrin (T(i)PrP), meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), meso-tetrakis(p-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)porphyrin (p-CF(3)-TPP), meso-tetramesitylporphyrin (TMP), and meso-tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphyrin (2,6-Cl(2)-TPP). Population ratios of the reaction products, Mn(Por)(CN) and [Mn(Por)(CN)(2)](-), have been sensitively affected by the solvents used. In the case of Mn(T(i)PrP)Cl, the following results are obtained: (i) The bis-adduct is preferentially formed in dipolar aprotic solvents such as DMSO, DMF, and acetonitrile. (ii) Both the mono- and bis-adduct are formed in the less polar solvents such as CH(2)Cl(2) and benzene though the complete conversion to the bis-adduct is achieved with much smaller amount of the ligand in benzene solution. (iii) Only the mono-adduct is formed in CHCl(3) solution even in the presence of a large excess of cyanide. (iv) Neither the mono- nor the bis-adduct is obtained in methanol solution. The results mentioned above have been explained in terms of the C-H.N and O-H.N hydrogen bonding in chloroform and methanol solutions, respectively, between the solvent molecules and cyanide ligand; hydrogen bonding weakens the coordination ability of cyanide and reduces the population of the bis-adduct. The importance of the C-H.N weak hydrogen bonding is most explicitly shown in the following fact: while the starting complex is completely converted to the bis-adduct in CH(2)Cl(2) solution, the conversion from the mono- to the bis-adduct is not observed even in the presence of 7000 equiv of Bu(4)N(+)CN(-) in CHCl(3) solution. The effective magnetic moments of the bis-adduct has been determined by the Evans method to be 3.2 micro(B) at 25 degrees C, suggesting that the complex adopts the usual (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(2) electron configuration despite the highly ruffled porphyrin core expected for [Mn(T(i)PrP)(CN)(2)](-). The spin densities of [Mn(T(i)PrP)(CN)(2)](-) centered on the pi MO have been determined on the basis of the (1)H and (13)C NMR chemical shifts. Estimated spin densities are as follows: meso-carbon, -0.0014; alpha-pyrrole carbon, -0.0011; beta-pyrrole carbon, +0.0066; pyrrole nitrogen, -0.022. The spin densities at the pyrrole carbon and meso nitrogen atoms are much smaller than those of the corresponding [Mn(TPP)(CN)(2)](-), which is ascribed to the nonplanar porphyrin ring of [Mn(T(i)PrP)(CN)(2)](-). This study has revealed that the C-H.N weak hydrogen bonding is playing an important role in determining the stability of the manganese(III) complexes.

Factors affecting the electronic ground state of low-spin iron(III) porphyrin complexes

To determine the factors affecting the ground-state electron configuration of low-spin Fe(III) porphyrin complexes, we have examined the (1)H NMR, (13)C NMR, and EPR spectra of a series of low-spin bis-ligated Fe(III) porphyrin complexes [Fe(Por)L(2)](+/-), in which the positions of porphyrin substituents and the coordination ability of axial ligands are different. The seven porphyrins used in this study are meso-tetraalkylporphyrins (TRP: R is propyl, cyclopropyl, or isopropyl), meso-tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), meso-tetrakis(2,3,4,5,6-pentafluorophenyl)porphyrin, and 5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaalkylporphyrins (ORTPP: R is methyl or ethyl). The porphyrin cores of TRP are more or less S(4)-ruffled depending on the bulkiness of the alkyl substituents, while those of ORTPP are highly S(4)-saddled. Three types of axial ligands are examined which have the following characteristics in ligand field theory: they are (i) strong sigma-donating imidazole (HIm), (ii) strong sigma-donating and weak pi-accepting cyanide (CN(-)), and (iii) weak sigma-donating and strong pi-accepting tert-butyl isocyanide ((t)BuNC). In the case of the bis(HIm) complexes, only the isopropyl complex, [Fe(T(i)PrP)(HIm)(2)](+), has shown the less common (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state; the other six complexes have exhibited the common (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. When the axial imidazole is replaced by cyanide, even the propyl and cyclopropyl complexes have shown the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state; the TPP and ORTPP complexes have still maintained the common (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. In the case of the bis((t)()BuNC) complexes, all the complexes have shown the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state. However, the contribution of the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) state to the electronic ground state differs from complex to complex; the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) contribution is the largest in [Fe(T(i)PrP)((t)()BuNC)(2)](+) and the smallest in [Fe(OETPPP)((t)BuNC)(2)](+). We have then examined the electronic ground state of low-spin [Fe(OEP)((t)BuNC)(2)](+) and [Fe(ProtoIXMe(2))((t)BuNC)(2)](+); OEP and ProtoIXMe(2) represent 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphyrin and protoporphyrin-IX dimethyl ester, respectively. These porphyrins have a(1u) HOMO in contrast to the other seven porphyrins that have a(2u) HOMO. The (13)C NMR and EPR studies have revealed that the contribution of the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) state in these complexes is as small as that in [Fe(OETPP)((t)BuNC)(2)](+). On the basis of these results, we have concluded that the low-spin iron(III) porphyrins that have (i) strong axial ligands, (ii) highly saddle shaped porphyrin rings, (iii) porphyrins with a(1u) HOMO, and (iv) electron withdrawing substituents at the meso positions tend to maintain the common (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state.

The binding ability of iron bonded to porphodimethene: structural, magnetic, and electronic relationship to iron porphyrin complexes

The availability of the parent compound, meso-hexaethylporphodimetheneiron(II), [(Et6N4)Fe] (2), of this report results from a novel synthetic methodology that makes [Et6N4Li2] (1) easily available. The major focus is on how the axial positions, which are the key reactive sites in metalloporphyrins, and the electronic configuration of the metal can be affected by the breakdown of the aromaticity of the porphyrin skeleton and by the nonplanar conformation of the ligand. DFT calculations indicate a 3B1(dz2)1(dyz)1 ground state for 2 versus the 3A2(dxz)1(dyz)1 ground state in the porphyrin analogue. The intermediate-spin state (S = 1) of 2 changed drastically upon addition of one or two axial ligands, as hexacoordination is preferred by iron(II). The hexacoordinate complexes [(Et6N4)Fe(L)(L')] (L = L' = THF, 3; L = L' = Py, 4; L = PhNO, L' = Py, 14) have been isolated and structurally characterized. Strong-field ligands lead to a low-spin diamagnetic state for iron(II), namely for complexes 4-7, 9, and 14, whereas 3 is a typical d6 high-spin complex, as is the pentacoordinate [(Et6N4)Fe(CN)]Bu4N (8). The structural analysis showed common features for 6, 7, 9, and 14: i) a small displacement of the metal from the N4 plane, and ii) an N4 cavity, larger than that in the corresponding porphyrins, affecting the Fe-N bond lengths. The 1H NMR spectrum is quite diagnostic of the two-fold symmetry in the diamagnetic hexacoordinate complexes, revealing either a D2h or a C2v symmetry. The CO stretching frequency (1951 cm(-1)) in complex 6 probes the good electron density at the metal. The one-electron oxidation of 2 led to pentacoordinate iron(III) derivatives [(Et6N4)Fe(Cl)] (10), [(Et6N4)2Fe2(mu-O)] (11), and [(Et6N4)2Fe2(mu-p-OC6H4-O)] (12). Complex 10 is a typical high-spin iron(III) (5.85muB at 298 K), while 11 and 12 behave as antiferromagnetic coupled iron(III) (J = -9.4cm(-1), 12, and J = -115cm(-1), 11). In complexes 10, 11, and 12 iron is sitting in a quite distorted square pyramidal geometry, in which the ligand displays a very distorted roof conformation with different degrees of ruffling. Distinctive structural and magnetic features have been found for the nitrosyl derivative [(Et6N4)Fe-NO], which has a low-spin state (S = 1/2) and the following structural parameters: Fe-N-O, 147.3(2) degrees; Fe-N, 1.708(2) A; N-O, 1.172(3) A. A comparative structural, magnetic, and theoretical analysis of the compounds listed above has been made with the analogous porphyrin derivatives. The detailed structural investigation has been mapped through the X-ray analysis of 2, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 14.