Oxaliplatin added to 5-fluorouracil-based therapy (5-FU +/- FA) in the treatment of 5-FU-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACRC): results from the European compassionate-use program

Progress in the study of reproductive toxicity of platinum-based antitumor drugs and their means of prevention

Platinum-based antitumor drugs are broad-spectrum agents with unique mechanisms of action. Combination chemotherapy regimens based on platinum drugs are commonly used in cancer treatment. However, these drugs can cause various adverse reactions in the human body through different routes of administration, including reproductive toxicity, genetic toxicity, and embryonic developmental toxicity. Preventing adverse effects is crucial to enhance patients' quality of life and reduce healthcare costs. This article discusses the types and developmental history of antitumor active platinum compounds, their mechanisms of action, routes of administration, and their potential reproductive, genetic, and embryonic developmental toxicity. This text explores preventive measures based on animal experimental results. Its aim is to provide references for personalized treatment and occupational protection when using platinum drugs. The continuous progress of science and technology, along with the deepening of medical research, suggests that the application of platinum drugs will broaden. Therefore, the development of new platinum drugs will be an important direction for future research.

Controlled pharmacokinetic anti-cancer drug concentration profiles lead to growth inhibition of colorectal cancer cells in a microfluidic device

We present a microfluidic device to expose cancer cells to a dynamic, in vivo-like concentration profile of a drug, and quantify efficacy on-chip. About 30% of cancer patients receive drug therapy. In conventional cell culture experiments drug efficacy is tested under static concentrations, e.g. 1 μM for 48 hours, whereas in vivo, drug concentration follows a pharmacokinetic profile with an initial peak and a decline over time. With the rise of microfluidic cell culture models, including organs-on-chips, there are opportunities to more realistically mimic in vivo-like concentrations. Our microfluidic device contains a cell culture chamber and a drug-dosing channel separated by a transparent membrane, to allow for shear stress-free drug exposure and label-free growth quantification. Dynamic drug concentration profiles in the cell culture chamber were controlled by continuously flowing controlled concentrations of drug in the dosing channel. The control over drug concentrations in the cell culture chambers was validated with fluorescence experiments and numerical simulations. Exposure of HCT116 colorectal cancer cells to static concentrations of the clinically used drug oxaliplatin resulted in a sensible dose-effect curve. Dynamic, in vivo-like drug exposure also led to statistically significant lower growth compared to untreated control. Continuous exposure to the average concentration of the in vivo-like exposure seems more effective than exposure to the peak concentration (Cmax) only. We expect that our microfluidic system will improve efficacy prediction of in vitro models, including organs-on-chips, and may lead to future clinical optimization of drug administration schedules.

The Value of Oxaliplatin in Combination with Continuous infusion ± Bolus 5-Fluorouracil and Levo-Folinic Acid in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Progressing after 5FU-Based Chemotherapy: A Giscad (Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract) Cancer Phase II Trial

Aims and background

The phase II trial was designed to evaluate the activity of combined oxaliplatin (L-OHP), continuous infusion (CI) ± bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and levo-folinic acid (IFA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progressing after one or more lines of 5FU-based chemotherapy.

Patients and methods

We designed two contemporary studies: in the former we enrolled patients previously treated with 1 line of chemotherapy, and in the latter, patients previously treated with 2, 3 and 4 lines. Seventy-six consecutive patients were enrolled: 45 received L-OHP (85 mg/m2 iv 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (100 mg/m2 iv 2 h on days 1 and 2) + 5FU iv bolus (400 mg/m2 days 1 and 2) + 5FU (600 mg/m2 CI 22 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 4); 31 received L-OHP (100 mg/m2 iv 2 h on day 1) + I-FA (250 mg/m2 iv 2 h on days 1 and 2), followed by 5FU (1500 mg/m2 CI 24 h days 1 and 2 (FOLFOX 2). The treatment was recycled every 2 weeks and continued until progression and/or unacceptable toxicity or patient preference. The primary end point was activity (tumor growth control [TGC]: partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]); the secondary end points were time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

Results

Forty-five patients in 2nd line (22 FOLFOX 4, 23 FOLFOX 2), 23 (17 FOLFOX 4, 6 FOLFOX 2) in 3rd, 4 in 4th and 1 in 5th line were assessable; 3 were lost to follow-up. In 15 patients (11 FOLFOX 4, 4 FOLFOX 2), disease involved the liver only. A total of 533 courses were administered with a range of 1-14 in FOLFOX4 and 1-12 in FOLFOX2; dose intensity was 92.85%, and the total dose of the administered L-OHP was 98.29%. As a 2nd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 achieved TGC in 72.8% of the patients (PR, 18.2%; SD, 54.6%), with a median TTP of 6 months and a median OS of 7 months, whereas in the FOLFOX 2 group these figures were 78.3% (PR 21.8%, SD 56.5%), and 5 and 9 months. As a 3rd line treatment, FOLFOX 4 produced TGC in 41.1% of patients (PR 23.5%, SD 17.6%), with a median TTP of 5 months and median OS of 7+ months, whereas FOLFOX 2 obtained respective values of 50% (PR 16.7%, SD 33.3%), 7 and 9 months. As a 4th line of treatment, TGC was achieved in 2 patients (1 PR, 1 SD); the patient in 5th line therapy obtained a SD. With “de Gramont” as the first-line regimen, patients assessable were 24 in FOLFOX 4 and 18 in FOLFOX 2. In the former population, TGC was 70.8% (PR 37.5%, SD 33.3%), with a TTP of 6 months and OS of 10 months, whereas with FOLFOX2 these values were 61.1% (PR 5.6%, SD 55.5), 5 and 7 months. In patients with liver involvement only, FOLFOX 4 obtained TGC in 63.6% of cases (with a TTP of 7 months and OS of 6+ months), FOLFOX 2 in 100% (with a TTP of 9.5 months and OS of 13.5+ months). Both schedules exhibited an acceptable toxicity: neurologic, hematologic and hepatic grade 3 side effects occurred in a limited number of patients, with a higher frequency in the FOLFOX 2 group.

Conclusions

Treatment with L-OHP, CI ± bolus 5FU and I-FA was well tolerated. The activity in terms of TGC was interesting and comparable with results reported in the literature for the standard treatment for 2nd line, i.e. irinotecan alone. Treatment was effective in 2nd line and in patients previously treated with more than two chemotherapy lines; in particular, treatment was active in patients with hepatic disease only. Although the two schedules seemed to achieve the same benefit with the same tolerance, we could not define from the study the better regime.

Metastatic colorectal cancer: current systemic treatment options

The treatment of colorectal cancer has become increasingly complex over recent years. With the emergence of new chemotherapy drugs and targeted agents, there has been great improvement in the prognosis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This review summarises the evidence supporting the use of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan with fluorouracil (5-FU) for the treatment of colorectal cancer and outlines the pivotal trials. Phase III trials have demonstrated the superiority of combination chemotherapy over single-agent 5-FU, but the optimal sequencing and combination of treatment is yet to be determined. Oral fluoropyrimidine derivatives have been shown to be equivalent to bolus 5-FU treatment and these offer another option for the treatment of colorectal cancer, but further studies are required to evaluate their use with irinotecan and oxaliplatin. The use of newer targeted therapies, such as bevacizumab and cetuximab, alone and in combination with chemotherapy are discussed, and the most recent data supporting their use is outlined. Bevacizumab-containing regimens have been shown to be superior to those without for the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer, and cetuximab has demonstrated activity in combination with chemotherapy in both the first- and second-line setting. Other targeted agents, such as vatalanib and panitumumab, are discussed and early clinical studies with these agents show promising results.

Prognostic factors predictive of response and survival to a modified FOLFOX regimen: importance of an increased neutrophil count

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic indicators of survival and response in a homogeneous population of chemotherapy-naive patients treated with oxaliplatin as part of 3 successive trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient data were derived from 3 successive phase II trials evaluating modifications of the FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) regimen. Clinical and laboratory prognostic factors were identified from the literature. Multifactor analyses stratified by treatment cohort were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response rate.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled across all 3 studies. Reduced PFS (n = 128) was associated with patients with the following characteristics: no previous surgery (P = 0.003); previous adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.015); > 1 organ involvement (P = 0.001); baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > or = upper limit of normal (P = 0.001); and time from diagnosis to metastases < 9 months (P = 0.043). Poor OS (n = 128) was associated with patients with the following characteristics: performance status > 1 (P < 0.001); > 1 organ involvement (P = 0.018); and baseline ANC > or = upper limit of normal (P < 0.001). Response rate was related to previous surgery (P = 0.017) and performance status (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This analysis has identified the additional prognostic importance of an increased ANC for PFS and OS. Further consideration needs to be given to include markers of systemic inflammation such as ANC as well as relevant cytokine levels in a larger cohort of identically treated patients.

Capecitabine and mitomycin C may be an effective treatment option for third-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

We evaluated the activity in terms of time to progression (TTP) of mitomycin C and capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who progressed after 2 lines of chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with advanced colorectal cancer undergoing third-line chemotherapy after failure of 5-FU with CPT-11 or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimens were treated with capecitabine and mitomycin C.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 55 years (range, 26-78 years) and the male:female ratio 21:40. We observed partial remissions in 5 patients (8%), stable disease in 25 patients (40%) and progression of disease in 31 patients (52%). Median TTP was 3 months and median survival was 6 months. Global toxicity was mild and entirely acceptable. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity occurred in 12 patients and grade 3-4 nonhematological toxicity in 5 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of capecitabine and mitomycin C could represent an effective and manageable treatment option for colorectal cancer patients failing previous chemotherapy regimens.

Multiple-target Chemotherapy (Lv-modulated 5-FU Bolus and Continuous Infusion, Oxaliplatin, CPT-11) in Advanced 5-Fu-refractory Colorectal Cancer: Mtd Definition and Efficacy Evaluation. A Phase I-II Study

Aims and Background

To identify the maximum tolerated doses and to define the activity of a regimen incorporating leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus and continuous infusion, oxaliplatin (I-OHP) and irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with advanced, 5-FU-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC).

Patients and Methods

Starting doses: LV 100 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion followed by 5-FU 300 mg/m2 bolus administration followed by 5-FU 500 mg/m2 as a 22-hour infusion on days 1 and 2; I-OHP 65 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion concomitantly with LV on day 1; CPT-11 90 mg/m2 concomitantly with LV on day 2. Planned cycle interval: 2 weeks.

Results

Two hundred twenty-six cycles were administered to 27 patients. Recommended doses were 5-FU bolus 300 mg/m2, 5-FU protracted infusion 500 mg/m2, l-OHP 75 mg/m2, and CPT-11 150 mg/m2. Among 25 patients evaluable for response we observed 13 disease stabilizations (52%; 95% CI: 33-71%), 6 instances of disease progression and 6 responses (24%; 95% CI: 7-41%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 24 and 60 weeks, respectively. A cycle delay >3 days was observed in 134/199 cycles (67%).

Conclusions

This study confirms the feasibility of triplet chemotherapy in patients with advanced 5-FU-refractory CRC.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (OXAFAFU) versus irinotecan plus high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil i.v. bolus (IRIFAFU) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group phase III trial

PURPOSE

The primary end point of this phase III trial was to compare the response rate (RR) of oxaliplatin (OXA) plus levo-folinic acid (l-FA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus with that of irinotecan (IRI) plus l-FA and 5-FU bolus in advanced colorectal carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal carcinoma were randomly allocated to receive: IRI 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) intravenously plus 5-FU 850 mg/m(2) on day 2 (IRIFAFU); or OXA 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, l-FA 250 mg/m(2) plus 5-FU 1050 mg/m(2) on day 2 [OXAFAFU high dose (hd)]. Cycles were given every 2 weeks. After a planned interim analysis, OXA was reduced to 85 mg/m(2) and 5-FU to 850 mg/m(2) [OXAFAFU low dose (ld)].

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-four patients (IRIFAFU, 135; OXAFAFUhd, 71; OXAFAFUld, 68) were treated. Forty-two confirmed responses were achieved with IRIFAFU, 29 with OXAFAFUhd and 32 with OXAFAFUld. The response rate with OXAFAFU [44%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 35% to 52%] was significantly higher (P=0.029) than that of IRIFAFU (31%; 95% CI 23% to 40%). Occurrence of grade > or =3 neutropenia with OXAFAFUld was similar to that for IRIFAFU (29% versus 31%), while severe diarrhoea was significantly lower (12% versus 24%). Median failure-free survival (7 versus 5.8 months; P=0.046) and overall survival of patients (18.9 versus 15.6 months; P=0.032) were significantly prolonged with OXAFAFU.

CONCLUSIONS

OXAFAFU was more active and less toxic than IRIFAFU, and it should be preferred in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients.

Combined modality treatment for rectal cancer

Significant gains have been achieved in the integration of radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy with surgery in the management of patients with localized rectal cancer. Treatment combinations of RT and chemotherapy with surgery have evolved to neoadjuvant approaches of these modalities to enhance sphincter preservation, tumor control, and reduction of acute and late treatment-related morbidity. Although 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy in combination with RT remains the standard adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, the integration of novel chemotherapeutic agents and biologic modulators is being actively investigated.

Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity and the development of neuropathy

The pathophysiology of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity remains unclear, although in vitro studies suggest involvement of voltage-gated Na+ channels. In the present study, clinical assessment was combined with nerve conduction studies (NCS) and nerve excitability studies in 16 patients after completion of oxaliplatin therapy. Chronic neuropathic symptoms persisted in 50% of patients. NCS confirmed abnormalities in symptomatic patients: sensory potentials were significantly low, whereas motor studies remained essentially normal. At 12-month follow-up of symptomatic patients, positive sensory symptoms improved but NCS abnormalities persisted. Cumulative oxaliplatin dose was a predictor of neuropathy, and long-term effects appeared to be minimized by low single-infusion dosages. Nerve excitability measures in symptomatic patients established that axons were of high threshold. Refractoriness was significantly greater in patients (symptomatic group, 56.3 +/- 24.9%; entire patient group, 46.3 +/- 12.5%; controls, 27.1 +/- 1.9%; P < 0.05). Thus, although positive sensory symptoms of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy improved, negative sensory symptoms and abnormalities of sensory nerve conduction persisted. Differences in nerve excitability measures, particularly refractoriness, support in vitro studies indicating involvement of voltage-gated transient Na+-channel dysfunction in the development of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX 4) in platinum-resistant and taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer: a phase II study

OBJECTIVE

A prospective phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU) and high-dose leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOX-4) in patients with platinum-resistant, taxane-pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients, with a median age of 58 years (range 33-77), were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg m(-2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg m(-2) day(-1) as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg m(-2) day(-1) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles.

RESULTS

The vast majority of patients had performance status 0 or 1 and 76.3% had > or = 2 metastatic sites. A median number of four cycles per patient (range, 1-8) were administered. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, 3 patients (7.9%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 8 (21.1%) achieved a partial response (PR), for an overall response rate of 29%. Another 29% of patients had stable disease (SD). The median relapse-free survival was 5.2 months (range 2.5-17), the median time to tumor progression was 4.8 months (range 0.6-19), and the median overall survival was 10.1 months (range 0.2-36). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 29% and 21.1% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was encountered in 3 patients (7.9%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity developed in 15.8% of patients; neurotoxicity gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and asthenia were not a serious problem. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin and 5-FU/LV (FOLFOX-4) appears to be an effective regimen with a good toxicity profile for the treatment of platinum-resistant, taxane-pretreated ovarian cancer.

Compassionate-use oxaliplatin with bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of a concomitant oxaliplatin/bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen in 123 heavily pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer was evaluated. Patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and radiographically progressive cancer which failed to respond to between two and five prior treatment modalities were consented and enrolled.

METHODS

Patients received oxaliplatin on day 1 of weeks 1, 3, and 5 of an 8-week cycle. 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin was administered on day 1 of weeks 1 through 6.

RESULTS

Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were as follows: diarrhea 30%; vomiting 11%; hematologic < 3%; peripheral neuropathy 2.5%. Of the 101 patients evaluable for response, 7% achieved a partial response (median duration 4.25 mo), 1 patient achieved a minor response (7 mo), and 31% had stable disease (median duration 6.08 mo). The median time to progression was 3.6 months.

CONCLUSION

This regimen in heavily pretreated patients with disseminated colorectal cancer is of modest benefit, often at the expense of considerable gastrointestinal toxicity. It appears that the use of oxaliplatin/bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin is more toxic than oxaliplatin/infusional 5-fluorouracil and possibly less effective.

Prospective multicenter phase II study of irinotecan as third-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and progression after bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil

Irinotecan has proven anti-tumor activity as induction treatment in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or as second-line treatment after 5-FU in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the present phase II study was to evaluate irinotecan as third-line chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer after sequential treatment with bolus 5-FU followed by an infusional 5-FU regimen. Patients pretreated with bolus 5-FU/folinic acid and the infusional 5-FU/folinic acid regimen were treated with 350 mg/m irinotecan i.v. once every 3 weeks in a multicenter phase II study. Tumor size was measured every cycle and treatment with irinotecan was continued until the occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 50 pretreated patients were included. Of the 45 evaluable patients, 13.3% [n=6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1-26.8] attained a response (complete/partial response) to treatment lasting 5.6 months (95% CI 4.2-6.3) and in four patients response has been confirmed (8.9%, 95% CI 2.5-21.2). Disease stabilization was noted in 51.1% of the patients (n=23, 95% CI 35.8-66.3). The median duration of response/disease stabilization was 4.2 months (95% CI 3.2-6.0). Median overall survival was 7.9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.1), corresponding to a calculated 1-year survival of 28.3% (95% CI 15.2-41.3). Severe neutropenia occurred in 14% (n=7) and anemia grade III in 6% of the patients (n=3). The most frequent non-hematological toxicity grade III/IV related to treatment was diarrhea in 24% of the patients (n=12), followed by vomiting in 8% (n=4) and constipation as well as infection in two patients each (4%) (evaluable n=50). We conclude single-agent irinotecan is an effective and well-tolerable treatment in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of bolus and infusional 5-FU/folinic acid regimens. Elderly patients had the same probability to respond.

Chemotherapeutic and biologic agents as radiosensitizers in rectal cancer

Over the past 25 years, important advances have been made in the management of patients with resectable rectal cancer. Clinical studies have shown the efficacy of combined chemoradiation therapy in enhancing resectability and sphincter preservation rates, decreasing local recurrence, and improving survival of patients with rectal cancer. Although 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the standard chemotherapeutic agent used concurrently with radiation therapy, newer chemotherapeutic agents including capecitabine, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin have also been studied as radiosensitizers in this setting. Novel targeted biologic agents including celecoxib and bevacizumab are being explored in combination with standard chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism of action and the key clinical studies of each agent as a radiosensitizer.

Phase I trial of sequential raltitrexed followed by bolus 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sequential raltitrexed (Tomudex) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by bolus administration every 3 weeks in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (aCRC) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma. This phase I dose-escalation study was carried out in three stages: (1) 5-FU fixed at 900 mg/m, raltitrexed escalated from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/m, (2) raltitrexed fixed at 3.0 mg/m, 5-FU escalated from 900 mg/m until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and (3) 5-FU fixed at the dose level below DLT, raltitrexed escalated from 3.0 mg/m until MTD. Seventy-one patients with measurable disease were enrolled. No DLTs were observed during stage 1 of treatment. At a fixed dose of raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m, DLT developed when 5-FU was increased to 1350 mg/m (stage 2). When 5-FU was fixed at 1200 mg/m and raltitrexed was increased to 6.0 mg/m (stage 3), DLT was dose limiting. The recommended doses for further study are 5.5 mg/m ralitrexed and 1200 mg/m 5-FU. Of the 69 patients evaluated for efficacy, one had a complete response (8.0 months) and five had partial responses (5.1-11.6 months). Thirty patients had stable disease for 5 or more cycles of therapy (mean time to progression: 3.6 months). Median survival was 11.7 months. We conclude that raltitrexed can be combined with bolus 5-FU, at raltitrexed doses that are higher than the recommended single-agent dose of 3.0 mg/m, with manageable toxicity. This combination shows encouraging activity, and survival appears promising in the pre-treated aCRC patient population. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial

PURPOSE

In North America, no effective therapy has been available for patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer after front-line treatment with irinotecan, bolus fluorouracil (FU), and leucovorin (IFL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed after IFL therapy were randomly assigned to bolus and infusional FU and leucovorin (LV5FU2), single-agent oxaliplatin, or the combination (FOLFOX4). This planned interim analysis evaluated objective response rate (RR), time to tumor progression (TTP), and alleviation of tumor-related symptoms (TRS) in an initial cohort of patients.

RESULTS

Between November 2000 and September 2001, 463 patients from 120 sites in North America were randomly assigned to treatment. FOLFOX4 proved superior to LV5FU2 in all measures of clinical efficacy. Objective RRs determined by an independent radiology panel were 9.9% for FOLFOX4 versus 0% for LV5FU2 (Fisher's exact test, P <.0001). Median TTP was 4.6 months for FOLFOX4 versus 2.7 months for LV5FU2 (two-sided, stratified log-rank test, P <.0001). Relief of TRS occurred in 33% of patients treated with FOLFOX4 versus 12% of patients treated with LVFU2 (chi2 test, P <.001). Single-agent oxaliplatin was not superior to LV5FU2 in any measure of efficacy. Patients treated with FOLFOX4 experienced a higher incidence of clinically significant toxicities than patients treated with LV5FU2, but these toxicities were predictable and did not result in a higher rate of treatment discontinuation or 60-day mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

For patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, second-line treatment with FOLFOX4 is superior to treatment with LVFU2 in terms of RR, TTP, and relief of TRS.

Hypersensitivity and idiosyncratic reactions to oxaliplatin

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a third-generation platinum analog that is used to treat a variety of solid tumors, particularly colorectal carcinoma. Patients may develop hypersensitivity reactions, although this complication occurs infrequently.

METHODS

Three patients developed hypersensitivity reactions to oxaliplatin while undergoing treatment on a Phase I trial of oxaliplatin and capecitabine. An Entrez PUBMED search was performed to identify other cases.

RESULTS

Two patients experienced the abrupt onset of erythema alone or with pruritus during the 9th and 11th infusions of oxaliplatin, whereas the other patient developed fever and mild dyspnea a few hours after the 9th oxaliplatin infusion. All 3 patients were rechallenged successfully for at least 1 additional oxaliplatin infusion by using oral dexamethasone, 20 mg orally, 6 and 12 hours before the administration of oxaliplatin and by administering intravenously 125 mg of solumedrol, 50 mg of diphenhydramine, and 50 mg of cimetidine 30 minutes before oxaliplatin. The literature review suggests two distinct patterns of reactions: classic hypersensitivity (as experienced by the first two patients) and idiosyncratic reactions (as experienced by the third patient).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who develop mild to moderate hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin may be pretreated with steroids and antagonists of Type 1 and 2 histamine receptors, whereas patients who develop severe reactions are unlikely to tolerate further therapy.

Oxaliplatin plus high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in pretreated advanced breast cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty anthracycline- and taxane-pretreated MBC patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-h infusion on day 1, LV 200 mg/m(2)/day as a 2-h infusion followed by bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day for 2 consecutive days. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated for response every two cycles.

RESULTS

The median age was 51 years (range 34-75). Twenty patients (40%) had received three or more chemotherapeutic regimens, 64% had three or four metastatic sites and 78% had visceral metastases. All patients had prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on an intention-to-treat analysis, one patient (2%) achieved a complete response and 16 (32%) a partial response, for a 34% overall response rate. Twenty-one patients (42%) had stable disease and 12 (24%) progressive disease. The median time to tumor progression was 5.3 months (range 0.5-12.8) and the median overall survival was 12.3 months (range 0.5-19.2). Toxicity was mild to moderate. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32% and 18%, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was experienced by three patients (6%), who were successfully treated. Grade 3/4 neurotoxicity was reported in 14% of the patients and gradually declined after treatment discontinuation. Cycle delays were reported in 28% of patients and dose reductions in 26%. Alopecia, nausea-vomiting, diarrhea and mucositis were not significant. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV seems to be an active regimen in patients with MBC and prior exposure to anthracyclines and taxanes with a good safety profile. The incidence of severe toxicity was quite low and the compliance of patients to the treatment was satisfactory. The results obtained with this regimen could be considered encouraging in this heavily pretreated group of breast cancer patients with a high incidence of visceral metastases.

Colorectal cancer in 2003: old principles, new strategies

In the last two decades the prognosis of colorectal cancer has improved for two reasons: (i) the proportion of patients with localized disease has increased and treatment has been standardized, and (ii) new chemotherapeutic agents have led to a longer life expectancy for patients with advanced disease. In this review the current insights in disease etiology and treatment of localized and disseminated colorectal cancer are discussed.

[Raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer: in vitro and in vivo study of a synergistic cytostatic combination]

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in vitro using 4 colorectal cell-lines and subsequently in vivo in 36 patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing palliative 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-based chemotherapy. In the preclinical phase of this study, the efficacy of oxaliplatin and of raltitrexed as well as of 5-FU alone and in combination was evaluated in 4 different human colorectalcarcinoma cell-lines with the MTT-test (Microculture Tetrazolium Assay). In the clinical phase 36 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within 6 months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with 5-FU/leucovorin +/- irinotecan were enrolled in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every 3 weeks for a total of 8 courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease. A supraadditive effect was found for the experimental combination of oxalipatin and raltitrexed in 3/4 of cell lines. In the clinical phase the overall response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients. Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only 7 (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 1.2 to 14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8/36 (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 nonhematologic adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in 3, asthenia in 1, diarrhea in 2, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in 2 patients, respectively. Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has not only in vitro, but also in vivo in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine/leucovorine +/- irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer antitumor activity. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and its convenient 3-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Second-line chemotherapy with a hybrid-alternating regimen of bolus 5FU modulated by methotrexate and infusional 5FU modulated by folinic acid in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer pretreated with 5FU. A phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In vitro, methotrexate (MTX) is the best modulator for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5FU), whereas folinic acid (FA) is the best for continuous infusion. We evaluated the effect of 5FU modulated by both MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) as second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Entry criteria were: at least one 5FU-based chemotherapy regimen as first-line treatment for metastatic disease, or progression within twelve months after 5FU-containing adjuvant therapy. Treatment schedule: MTX 200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 15; 5FU 600 mg/m2 i.v. bolus, days 2 and 16; 5FU 200 mg/m2 i.v. continuous infusion for 21 days, starting on day 29; FA 20 mg/m2 i.v. bolus weekly during the three weeks of 5FU infusion. Cycles were repeated every 56 days. The primary end-point was tumour control rate, including partial responses and stabilizations.

RESULTS

34/35 patients enrolled were evaluable for response. Five (14.7%) had a partial response, 13 (38.2%) disease stabilization, and 16 (47.1%) progressed; tumour control rate was 52.9%. Median TTP was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.03-7.83); 29 patients had died. Median OAS was 15.9 months (95% CI 8.8-21.9). Toxicity was mild.

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen constituted by 5FU modulated by MTX (bolus administration) and FA (continuous infusion) is active as second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin: results in colorectal carcinoma

Oxaliplatin, a platinum compound characterized by a diaminocyclohexane (DACH) platinum carrier ligand, has proven its efficacy in first- and second-line advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) treatment. Acute reversible and cumulative peripheral sensory neuropathy has been observed frequently with oxaliplatin treatment and limits its use. Its synergism with other drugs, as well as its different mechanism of action and toxicity profile make it an attractive candidate for combination studies in CRC. It can be combined safely with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)+/-folinic acid (LV), irinotecan, raltitrexed, multitarget antifolate LY231514 (MTA), and oral 5-FU prodrugs. These combinations confer both an increased response rate compared to that of any single agent and an increased secondary surgical resection of initially unresectable metastases, possibly leading to prolonged survival. In three prospective randomized phase III studies in advanced CRC, oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV improved significantly progression-free survival without a significant increase in median survival time and without affecting quality of life, compared to treatment with 5-FU/LV. Ongoing clinical trials will define its role in the adjuvant setting.

Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

PURPOSE

We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of glutathione (GSH) in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients treated with a bimonthly oxaliplatin-based regimen were randomized to receive GSH (1,500 mg/m(2) over a 15-minute infusion period before oxaliplatin) or normal saline solution. Clinical neurologic evaluation and electrophysiologic investigations were performed at baseline and after four (oxaliplatin dose, 400 mg/m(2)), eight (oxaliplatin dose, 800 mg/m(2)), and 12 (oxaliplatin dose, 1,200 mg/m(2)) cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

At the fourth cycle, seven patients showed clinically evident neuropathy in the GSH arm, whereas 11 patients in the placebo arm did. After the eighth cycle, nine of 21 assessable patients in the GSH arm suffered from neurotoxicity compared with 15 of 19 in the placebo arm. With regard to grade 2 to 4 National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria, 11 patients experienced neuropathy in the placebo arm compared with only two patients in the GSH arm (P =.003). After 12 cycles, grade 2 to 4 neurotoxicity was observed in three patients in the GSH arm and in eight patients in the placebo arm (P =.004). The neurophysiologic investigations (sural sensory nerve conduction) showed a statistically significant reduction of the values in the placebo arm but not in the GSH arm. The response rate was 26.9% in the GSH arm and 23.1% in the placebo arm, showing no reduction in activity of oxaliplatin.

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that GSH is a promising drug for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, and that it does not reduce the clinical activity of oxaliplatin.

Whole-body hyperthermia (41.8 degrees C) combined with bimonthly oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil 48-hour continuous infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II study

BACKGROUND

Second- and third-line treatments remain a challenge in advanced colorectal cancer. Studies of bimonthly regimens of high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by continuous infusion combined with oxaliplatin (L-OHP) have shown encouraging response rates in patients not responding to a bimonthly LV/5-FU regimen. Hyperthermic enhancement of L-OHP efficiency by increased DNA adduct formation has been demonstrated in vitro. This study was designed to address feasibility, toxicity and efficacy issues of whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) as an adjunct to L-OHP/LV/5-FU in pretreated patients after progression to first- and second-line treatments with LV/5-FU by continuous infusion and irinotecan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with advanced colorectal cancer, who had progressed during or within 3 months after completion of chemotherapy with LV/5-FU 24-h infusion (LV/5-FU(24h)) (eight patients) or irinotecan combined with or after LV/5-FU(24h )(36 patients), were treated with L-OHP 85 mg/m(2), 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion, followed by LV 200 mg/m(2), 1-h i.v. infusion, and 5-FU 3 g/m(2), 48-h continuous infusion. Every second cycle of the biweekly regimen was combined with WBH, thus allowing a comparison of toxicity with and without WBH in the same patient. Whole-body hyperthermia was administered by a humidified radiant heat device. The target temperature of 41.8 degrees C was maintained for 60 min. L-OHP (2-h infusion) was started at a core body temperature of 39 degrees C.

RESULTS

All patients could be evaluated for toxicity, and 41 patients were evaluable for response. A total of 273 L-OHP-containing regimens were administered, 130 with and 143 without WBH. Hyperthermic treatment combined with L-OHP/LV/5-FU showed no unexpected toxicities. WHO grade 3 toxicities were rare and evenly balanced between cycles given with or without WBH. One early death occurred due to sepsis and tumor lysis. The overall response rate was 20%, with two complete and six partial responses. Twenty-three patients (56%) had stable disease and nine patients (22%) progressive disease. With a median observation time of 70 weeks, the median time to progression was 21 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI) 17-25 weeks] and the median survival was 50 weeks (95% CI 39-61 weeks) from the start of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial suggests some advantage of combining L-OHP/LV/5-FU with WBH. Results compare favorably with the activity of similar regimens without WBH in less extensively pretreated patients. These data support further evaluation and warrant phase III studies.

Oxaliplatin and UFT combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin combined with uracil and tegafur (UFT) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer previously treated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen. From January to December 1999, 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Patients received intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and daily oral UFT 350 mg/m2 in 3 divided doses for 21 days and repeated every 21 days. Thirty-one of 34 patients were assessable for response and 32 patients for toxicity. Partial response was observed in four patients and stable disease in six patients. The response rate was 12.9% (95% CI, 3.6-29.8%) and median duration of response was 17 weeks. The median overall survival and progression-free survival of all patients were 26 weeks (range, 3-90+ weeks) and 9 weeks (range, 3-56 weeks), respectively. Sensory neuropathy was the most common toxicity, but there was no severe toxicity (>grade II) except for a case of grade III neutropenia. We conclude that oxaliplatin and UFT combination chemotherapy was well tolerated without significant toxicities. The results of this trial will serve as the basis for designing new clinical trials with a different dose or schedule.

A phase II trial of farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor SCH 66336, given by twice-daily oral administration, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan

BACKGROUND

ras genes encode Ras proteins that are important for signal transduction in cancer cells. Farnesyl protein transferase (FPTase) is an enzyme that is responsible for a critical post-translational modification of Ras.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We report the results of a phase II trial of SCH 66336, an FPTase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This is the first reported experience of an FPTase inhibitor in this disease. All patients were considered refractory to first- and second-line therapy. A total of 21 evaluable patients were treated with a starting dose of 200 mg b.i.d. given continuously.

RESULTS

The major side-effects were fatigue (grade 1 in 42%, grade 2 in 42% and grade 3 in 14%), diarrhea (grade 1 in 23% and grade 3 in 42%) and nausea (grade 2 in 16%). Elevations in serum creatinine (grade 2 or 3) were observed in 19% of patients and appeared to be related to dehydration induced by diarrhea. Significant hematological toxicity was not observed (only grade 1 thrombocytopenia in 19% and grade 2 or 3 anemia in 28%). Pharmacological studies revealed adequate mean pre-dose plasma concentrations in this group of patients on day 15 of therapy. No objective responses were observed, although stable disease was seen in three patients for several months. Administration of SCH 66336 was accompanied by gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Future development of this compound cannot be recommended as monotherapy in this disease.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil in taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

Phase II study evaluating efficacy and safety of combined oxaliplatin/fluorouracil (5-FU) in taxane-pretreated advanced and metastatic breast cancer (ABC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four taxane- and anthracycline-pretreated (within 6 months of study entry) women were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) (2-hour intravenous [IV] infusion), day 1, and 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2)/d (continuous IV infusion) days 1 to 4, every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 51 years (range, 34 to 71 years), with a median of two involved organs (range, one to six organs), and metastases in the liver (70%), bone (47%), and lung (34%). Patients had a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens (range, one to six regimens), and 78% had previous hormonal therapy, with clinical taxane and anthracycline resistance in 53% and 34%, respectively. A total of 367 cycles were administered, with a median of six cycles/patient (range, one to 15 cycles). Sixty patients were assessable for response (World Health Organization criteria): 17 partial response, 26 stable disease, and 17 disease progression, giving an overall response rate of 27% (95% confidence interval, 16.3% to 39.1%), and 26% and 36% in taxane- and anthracycline-resistant populations, respectively, all responders having metastatic liver disease. Median time to progression was 4.8 months, and median overall survival was 11.9 months. Four treatment-related serious adverse events occurred, seven patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Hematotoxicity was prevalent but rarely severe, with grade 3-4 neutropenia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in 34%, 19%, and 16% of patients, respectively, and a single episode of febrile neutropenia. One third of patients developed grade 2-3 peripheral neuropathy (oxaliplatin-specific scale), with grade 3 in only 8%.

CONCLUSION

This oxaliplatin/5-FU combination is effective with an excellent safety profile in anthracycline/taxane-pretreated ABC patients, showing encouraging activity in patients with anthracycline/taxane-resistance or visceral disease.

An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of substituting cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-four evaluable patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated at 3-weekly intervals with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, d 1), cytarabine (2 g/m2 for two doses, d 2) and dexamethasone (40 mg, d 1-4). The median age of the patients was 58 (range 18-70). Histological subtypes were diffuse large B cell, 20; mantle cell, two; anaplastic large cell, one; and peripheral T cell, one. The overall objective response rate (RR) was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 29-71%] including four complete responses and eight partial responses. RR for those patients treated at first relapse was higher than those treated at second and subsequent relapse (77% versus 29%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was mainly haematological: anaemia 17%, neutropenia 75% and thrombocytopenia 75%. No grade 4 non-haematological toxicity was reported. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. Median survival was 10.6 months. Probabilities of 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 47% (95% CI = 26-66%) and 50% (95% CI = 23-72%) respectively. In conclusion, dexamethasone, cytarabine and oxaliplatin (DHAX) is a novel combination in salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has clinically significant activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. Lack of renal toxicity makes DHAX an attractive cytoreductive regimen before high-dose chemotherapy.

Management of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects in the treatment of colorectal cancer

The anticancer agents fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin show limited efficacy in the treatment of colorectal cancer and may be associated with substantial toxicity. Therefore, the prevention and reduction of chemotherapy-induced adverse effects is of major significance, in accordance with the increasing concern for the quality of life of patients with cancer. Therapeutic drug monitoring of fluorouracil and chronomodulation of fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, have been effective in reducing the incidence and gravity of adverse effects in several clinical trials. However, these concepts have not been implemented in clinical practice yet. At the present time, dose adaptation and supportive measures are the main tools for toxicity control in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In this review, supportive measures for alleviation of the adverse effects of fluorouracil, raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, respectively, are described, based on study results. The main adverse effects of these agents are myelosuppression, oral mucositis, diarrhoea, acute cholinergic syndrome, nausea and emesis, neurotoxicity, hand-foot syndrome and other cutaneous adverse effects, ocular toxicity, cardiotoxicity, small bowel toxicity, asthenia, elevated liver transaminase levels and alopecia. The incidence and gravity of these adverse effects are more or less related to the agent and administration schedule involved. The supportive measures and recommendations include the use of specific drugs, alterations of administration schedule and several nonpharmacological methods. In addition, guidelines for dosage adjustments when toxicity occurs are presented. For optimal management of adverse effects, patients should be considered individually, while patients, nurses and physicians should cooperate to identify and treat adverse effects in an early stage of their development.

Oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-fluorouracil pretreated colorectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of oxaliplatin and protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) in patients with advanced or relapsed 5-FU pretreated colorectal cancer. 38 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal carcinoma with documented progression on or within 6 months following 5-FU or thymidylate synthase inhibitor containing chemotherapy were recruited between June 1997 and September 2000. Oxaliplatin (100 mg x m(-2)) was given every 2 weeks and PVI 5-FU (300 mg x m(-2) x day(-1)) was administered. Median age of patients was 61 years. 17 patients had >2 sites of disease involvement. 10 had received 5-FU based adjuvant chemotherapy. 16 received oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU as second-line chemotherapy for advanced disease and 22 as third or subsequent lines. Median follow up was 6.1 months. The best achieved objective tumour response rate was 29% (11 partial responses 95% confidence interval [CI] = 15-46%). 20 patients (52.6%) had stable disease. The median duration of response was 3.9 months. Even for patients who had previously received both 5-FU and irinotecan (n = 22), 27.3% had partial response with oxaliplatin and PVI 5-FU. 37 patients had symptoms on entry into the study. 25 patients had pain, 10 had anorexia and 28 had lethargy. 64%, 70% and 17.9% had symptomatic improvement after treatment respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia 10.6%, neutropenia 2.6%, thrombocytopenia 5.2%, diarrhoea 18.9%, nausea and vomiting 2.7%, infection 5.4% and lethargy 37.8%. The median survival was 9.1 months. Probability of overall survival at 6 months was 58.4% (95% CI = 38.7-73.7%). The median failure-free survival was 4 months. Oxaliplatin and PVI 5FU is an active and well tolerated regimen in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced colorectal cancer.

Second-line treatment with oxaliplatin + raltitrexed in patients with advanced colorectal cancer failing fluoropyrimidine/leucovorin-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined raltitrexed and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with fluoropyrimidine leucovorin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, who progressed while receiving or within six months after withholding palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines leucovorin +/- irinotecan, participated in this study. Treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 and raltitrexed 3.0 mg/m2 both given on day 1 every three weeks for a total of eight courses unless prior evidence of progressive disease.

RESULTS

The overall objective response rate was 33.3% for all 36 evaluable patients (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.6%-51%). Seventeen additional patients (47.2%) had stable disease, and only seven (19.5%) progressed. The median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range 1.2-14.0). After a median follow-up time of 12 months, 23 patients (63.8%) are still alive. The tolerance of treatment was acceptable with only 8 of 36 patients (22%) experiencing grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 non-haematological adverse reactions included peripheral sensory neuropathy in three, asthenia in one, diarrhea in two, and clinically insignificant increase in serum transaminases in two patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the combination of oxaliplatin and raltitrexed has substantial antitumour activity in patients with progressive fluoropyrimidine leucovorin + irinotecan pretreated colorectal cancer. Because of its favorable toxicity profile and convenient three-weekly outpatient administration schedule, further evaluation of this regimen seems warranted.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hepatic arterial infusion with oxaliplatin in combination with folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

To determine dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oxaliplatin administered as hepatic arterial infusion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with isolated hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer were treated every three weeks with increasing doses of oxaliplatin (4 hours; starting dose 25 mg/m2, escalation in steps of 25 mg/m2) in combination with folinic acid (1 hour, 200 mg/m2) and 5-fluorouracil (2 hour, 600 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (median age, 61 years) have been entered all of whom are fully evaluable. The DLT has been observed at dose level 6, i.e., at 150 mg/m2/cycle and consisted of leucopenia, obliteration of the hepatic artery, and acute pancreatitis. Overall, toxicity mainly consisted of nausea/vomiting (16 of 21 patients), anemia (16 of 21), upper abdominal pain (15 of 21), sensory neuropathy (10 of 21), diarrhea (9 of 21), and thrombocytopenia (9 of 21). The mean PK parameters were: terminal half-life of ultrafiltrable platin, 17.75 +/- 9.29 hours; renal elimination, 48.7% +/- 14.1% of the applied dose; renal clearance 135.55 +/- 45.32 ml/min. The mean area under the plasma-concentration curve (AUC) increased linearly from 3.22 +/- 0.61 microg x h/ml to 18.45 +/- 8.90 microg x h/ml through the first five dose levels (P = 0.0004). Ten of eighteen evaluable patients achieved a complete or partial response (59%).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose for phase II studies is 125 mg/m2 oxaliplatin.

Phase I study of a weekly schedule of oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin, and infusional fluorouracil in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) given on a weekly schedule including fixed doses of leucovorin (LV) and infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), to define the toxicity profile of this regimen and to find preliminary evidence of its activity in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients with progressive disease, treated with fluoropyrimidines and with histologically measurable MCRC entered into this phase I study. Fixed doses of LV (500 mg/m2) followed by a 48-hour 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 infusion (5-FU48h) were administered with escalating doses of L-OHP, starting from 60 mg/m2 and with stepwise increments of 5 mg/m2. No intra-patient dose escalation was allowed. Treatment was given once a week for four consecutive weeks, followed by a one-week rest period.

RESULTS

Three dose levels were tested. The MTD was L-OHP 70 mg/m2 since two of the three patients showed dose-limiting diarrhea and the third developed neutropenia during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Most patients complained of mild peripheral sensitive neurotoxicity, which was related to the cumulative dose of L-OHP. Treatment delays were necessary for a total of 42 cases, but only in II of 42 after the pre-arranged 10% dose reduction of 5-FU (2300 mg/m2). Sixteen patients were evaluable for response: seven (33%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 14.6%-57.0%) were considered to show a major response (one complete), six showed a stable disease, and in addition progressive disease was observed in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that L-OHP, LV and 5-FU can be administered safely and repetitively using a weekly schedule. Diarrhea and neutropenia are the DLT of this regimen. Its activity and its manageable toxicity profile deserve further evaluation in chemotherapy-naïve MCRC patients. The doses recommended for phase II trials are: L-OHP 65 mg/m2, LV 500 mg/m2 and 5-FU48h 2300 mg/m2 infusion given on a weekly-times-four schedule followed by a one-week rest period.

Use of the ratio of time to progression following first- and second-line therapy to document the activity of the combination of oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that the activity of a second-line treatment regimen can be documented by showing that the time to progression (TTP) following second-line therapy is longer than the TTP following first-line therapy in the same patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The ratio of TTP during first and second-line therapy, identified as the growth modulation index (GMI), was determined in 34 patients with advanced colorectal cancer. First-line chemotherapy consisted of one of several schedules of leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or raltitrexed. Second-line therapy consisted of the combination of LV-modulated 5-FU and oxaliplatin (1-OHP). Patients were switched to second-line therapy upon evidence of progressive disease following first-line therapy.

RESULTS

Median TTP following first-line therapy was 13 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-18.7), while median TTP following second-line therapy was 31 weeks (95% CI: 21.3-41.0). Sixteen patients (47%; 95% CI: 35%-59%), showed a GMI > or = 1.33, while the remaining 18 patients (53%; 95% CI: 40%-66%) had a GMI < 1.33. Log-rank analysis of the Kaplan-Meier curves of TTP following first- versus second-line therapy demonstrated a statistically significant difference in favour of second-line therapy (P = 0.0081).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the utility of the GMI as a tool for assessing the activity of novel second-line therapeutic programs.

Oxaliplatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer and its potential in other malignancies

Oxaliplatin is a platinum compound that inhibits DNA synthesis, primarily by causing intrastrand cross-links in DNA. Oxaliplatin has a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity and has demonstrated a lack of cross-resistance with other platinum compounds. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, intravenous oxaliplatin has been trialled as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The highest response rates were achieved when oxaliplatin was used in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin; calcium folinate), typically > or = 50% in the first-line setting and 13 to 45% as a second-line therapy. First-line triple therapy with oxaliplatin and fuorouracil/folinic acid achieved significantly higher response rates and longer median progression-free survival than fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. However, no significant difference in the median duration of overall survival was found. This may be a consequence of the subsequent use of oxaliplatin and/or surgery after disease progression in patients who relapsed after fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. Neoadjuvant therapy with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid has proven beneficial in enabling surgical removal of previously unresectable liver metastases. In 2 studies, surgery with curative intent was performed in 16 and 51% of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases following oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy; the 5-year survival rates were 40 and 50%, respectively. In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide achieved an objective response rate which did not differ significantly from that of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (33 vs 42%). In addition, oxaliplatin has shown efficacy in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer and achieved objective response rates similar to paclitaxel in this setting (16 vs 17%). Promising results have also been found with oxaliplatin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, breast cancer, mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. Reversible, cumulative, peripheral sensory neuropathy is the principle dose-limiting factor of oxaliplatin therapy. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities occur frequently but are generally mild to moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid is an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, both as a first-line therapy and in patients refractory to previous chemotherapy. Although preliminary results failed to show any overall survival advantage of this regimen over fluorouracil/folinic acid alone, this may be a consequence of trial design and requires further examination. Additional clinical investigation of oxaliplatin in patients with other cancers is warranted given the promising results achieved in early trials, most notably in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer.

Risk factors determining chemotherapeutic toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Antitumour therapy in advanced colorectal cancer has limited efficacy. For decades, fluorouracil has been the main anticancer drug for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Recently, however, new agents have been introduced: raltitrexed, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Currently, the dosage for an individual patient is calculated from the estimated body surface area of the patient. Toxicity, however, frequently necessitates decreasing the dosage, extending the dose interval or even discontinuing treatment. Risk factors with predictive value for toxicity have been identified in several studies. These risk factors are often determined by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drug. In this review, the risk factors for toxicity of the cytotoxic agents used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer are considered. For fluorouracil, age, gender, performance status, genetic polymorphism of dihydropyridine dehydrogenase, drug administration schedule, circadian rhythm of plasma concentrations, history of previous chemotherapy-related diarrhoea, xerostomia, low neutrophil levels, and drug-drug interactions have been identified as affecting chemotherapeutic toxicity. For raltitrexed, gender and renal and hepatic impairment, and for oxaliplatin, renal impairment and circadian rhythm of plasma concentrations, respectively, can be considered as risk factors for toxicity. In addition, age, performance status, bilirubinaemia, genetic polymorphism of uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucuronyltransferase-1A1 and drug administration schedule have been shown to be related to irinotecan toxicity. The available literature suggests that dose adjustment based on these risk factors can be used to individualise the dose in order to decrease toxicity and to improve the therapeutic index. This also applies to therapeutic drug monitoring, which has been shown to be effective controlling the toxicity of fluorouracil in some studies. Future research is warranted to assess the potential advantage of dose individualisation of chemotherapy founded on risk factors, over direct dose calculation from the estimated body surface area, with regard to toxicity, therapeutic index, and quality of life, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Oxaliplatin clinical activity: a review

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), a recently developed third-generation cisplatin analogue with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, has displayed preclinical and clinical activity in a wide variety of tumour types. Synergistic with 5-FU in colorectal cancer (CRC), the combination has proven efficacy in 5-FU-resistant advanced disease and in previously untreated CRC, as demonstrated in controlled phase III trials, while evaluation in the adjuvant setting is ongoing. Due to its excellent safety profile, its unique mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance with other active agents in CRC, oxaliplatin has also been combined with CPT-11 and Raltitrexed with promising results. Trials in pretreated and untreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel, indicate a yet to be defined role in AOC and confirm its lack of cross-resistance with cis/carboplatin. Clinical investigations of single agent and combination therapies in breast, lung, prostate and germ-cell carcinomas, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and malignant mesothelioma are being pursued. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.

Dramatic tumor response of bulky liver metastases following treatment with CPT-11 and a chronomodulated 4-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin every 2 weeks in a colorectal cancer patient

Three active antitumor agents, i.e. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and CPT-11, are available for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and have been successfully combined in two-drug regimens. Hence, CRC has become a chemosensitive disease, but the optimal combination of these agents in first-line treatment remains to be determined. We report the first case of the combination of CPT-11 with oxaliplatin, 5-FU and folinic acid (FA) as first-line chemotherapy for a patient with a pre-occlusive sigmoid adenocarcinoma and synchronous bulky liver metastases. CPT-11 was given at 125 mg/m2, prior to the start of a chronomodulated 4-day infusion of oxaliplatin 25 mg/m2/day, 5-FU 800 mg/m2/day and FA 300 mg/m2/day repeated every 2 weeks. The doses could be escalated to 150 mg/m2 for CPT-11 and 900 mg/m2/day for 5-FU. After six cycles of chemotherapy 70% reduction in tumor size was documented in the liver. The primary tumor was no longer detectable by barium enema. The toxicity included three episodes of grade 4 neutropenic fever, and two episodes of severe diarrhea and vomiting with dehydration. A cumulative grade 2 neurosensory toxicity was observed after six cycles. Following surgery of the primary tumor, because of the major hepatic tumor response and of the absence of extra-hepatic metastases, the patient might be registered for a liver transplantation program. This first report of combining the three active agents in CRC every 2 weeks led to a high dose intensity of each agent and was associated with a dramatic tumor response of a very advanced disease in a patient with already altered performance status. The antitumor activity in this patient suggests that a three-drug intensified regimen might be feasible and active. A prospective study appears warranted to further examine the efficacy and toxicity of this therapeutic approach, and to determine whether it may increase the fraction of advanced CRC patients becoming resectable. This aggressive chemotherapy program may contribute to a re-examination of the usefulness of liver transplantation in patients with metastatic CRC confined to the liver.