Meal composition effects on the oral bioavailability of indinavir in HIV-infected patients

In vivo deposition of poorly soluble drugs

Administered drug molecules, whether dissolved or solubilized, have the potential to precipitate and accumulate as solid forms in tissues and cells within the body. This phase transition can significantly impact the pharmacokinetics of treatment. It is thus crucial to gain an understanding of how drug solubility/permeability, drug formulations and routes of administration affect in vivo behaviors of drug deposition. This review examines literature reports on the drug deposition in tissues and cells of poorly water-soluble drugs, as well as underlying physical mechanisms that lead to precipitation. Our work particularly highlights drug deposition in macrophages and the subcellular fate of precipitated drugs. We also propose a tissue permeability-based classification framework to evaluate precipitation potentials of poorly soluble drugs in major organs and tissues. The impact on pharmacokinetics is further discussed and needs to be considered in developing drug delivery systems. Finally, bioimaging techniques that are used to examine aggregated states and the intracellular trafficking of absorbed drugs are summarized.

Chemometrics as a valuable tool for evaluating interactions between antiretroviral drugs and food

AIMS

Clinically significant interactions with food occur for more than half of antiretroviral drugs. Different physiochemical properties deriving from the chemical structures of antiretroviral drugs may contribute to the variable food effect. Chemometric methods allow analysing a large number of interrelated variables concomitantly and visualizing correlations between them. We used a chemometric approach to determine the types of correlations among different features of antiretroviral drugs and food that may influence interactions.

METHODS

Thirty-three antiretroviral drugs were analysed: ten nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, six non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, five integrase strand transfer inhibitors, ten protease inhibitors, one fusion inhibitor and one HIV maturation inhibitor. Input data for the analysis were collected from already published clinical studies, chemical records and calculations. We constructed a hierarchical partial least squares (PLS) model with three response parameters: postprandial change of time to reach maximum drug concentration (ΔTmax ), albumin binding (%) and logarithm of partition coefficient (logP). Predictor parameters were the first two principal components of principal component analysis (PCA) models for six groups of molecular descriptors.

RESULTS

PCA models explained 64.4% to 83.4% of the variance of the original parameters (average: 76.9%), whereas the PLS model had four significant components and explained 86.2% and 71.4% of the variance in the sets of predictor and response parameters, respectively. We observed 58 significant correlations between ΔTmax , albumin binding (%), logP and constitutional, topological, hydrogen bonding and charge-based molecular descriptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemometrics is a useful and valuable tool for analysing interactions between antiretroviral drugs and food.

Interactions of Antiretroviral Drugs with Food, Beverages, Dietary Supplements, and Alcohol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses

Multiple factors may affect combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). We investigated the impact of food, beverages, dietary supplements, and alcohol on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of 33 antiretroviral drugs. Systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines was performed, with 109 reports of 120 studies included. For each drug, meta-analyses or qualitative analyses were conducted. We have found clinically significant interactions with food for more than half of antiretroviral agents. The following drugs should be taken with or immediately after the meal: tenofovir disoproxil, etravirine, rilpivirine, dolutegravir, elvitegravir, atazanavir, darunavir, lopinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir. Didanosine, zalcitabine, zidovudine, efavirenz, amprenavir, fosamprenavir, and indinavir should be taken on an empty stomach for maximum patient benefit. Antiretroviral agents not mentioned above can be administered regardless of food. There is insufficient evidence available to make recommendations about consuming juice or alcohol with antiretroviral drugs. Resolving drug-food interactions may contribute to maximized cART effectiveness and safety.

Fast-Fed Variability: Insights into Drug Delivery, Molecular Manifestations, and Regulatory Aspects

Among various drug administration routes, oral drug delivery is preferred and is considered patient-friendly; hence, most of the marketed drugs are available as conventional tablets or capsules. In such cases, the administration of drugs with or without food has tremendous importance on the bioavailability of the drugs. The presence of food may increase (positive effect) or decrease (negative effect) the bioavailability of the drug. Such a positive or negative effect is undesirable since it makes dosage estimation difficult in several diseases. This may lead to an increased propensity for adverse effects of drugs when a positive food effect is perceived. However, a negative food effect may lead to therapeutic insufficiency for patients suffering from life-threatening disorders. This review emphasizes the causes of food effects, formulation strategies to overcome the fast-fed variability, and the regulatory aspects of drugs with food effects, which may open new avenues for researchers to design products that may help to eliminate fast-fed variability.

Pharmacokinetic Outcomes of the Interactions of Antiretroviral Agents with Food and Supplements: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Because pharmacokinetic changes in antiretroviral drugs (ARV), due to their concurrent administration with food or nutritional products, have become a clinical challenge, it is necessary to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of ARV in people living with the human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to clarify the pharmacokinetic outcomes of the interaction between supplements such as food, dietary supplements, and nutrients, and ARV. Twenty-four articles in both healthy subjects and PLWH were included in the qualitative analysis, of which five studies were included in the meta-analysis. Food−drug coadministration significantly increased the time to reach maximum concentration (tmax) (p < 0.00001) of ARV including abacavir, amprenavir, darunavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, zidovudine, ritonavir, and tenofovir alafenamide. In addition, the increased maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of ARV, such as darunavir, under fed conditions was observed. Area under the curve and terminal half-life were not significantly affected. Evaluating the pharmacokinetic aspects, it is vital to clinically investigate ARV and particular supplement interaction in PLWH. Educating patients about any potential interactions would be one of the effective recommendations during this HIV epidemic.

Impact of gastrointestinal tract variability on oral drug absorption and pharmacokinetics: An UNGAP review

The absorption of oral drugs is frequently plagued by significant variability with potentially serious therapeutic consequences. The source of variability can be traced back to interindividual variability in physiology, differences in special populations (age- and disease-dependent), drug and formulation properties, or food-drug interactions. Clinical evidence for the impact of some of these factors on drug pharmacokinetic variability is mounting: e.g. gastric pH and emptying time, small intestinal fluid properties, differences in pediatrics and the elderly, and surgical changes in gastrointestinal anatomy. However, the link of colonic factors variability (transit time, fluid composition, microbiome), sex differences (male vs. female) and gut-related diseases (chronic constipation, anorexia and cachexia) to drug absorption variability has not been firmly established yet. At the same time, a way to decrease oral drug pharmacokinetic variability is provided by the pharmaceutical industry: clinical evidence suggests that formulation approaches employed during drug development can decrease the variability in oral exposure. This review outlines the main drivers of oral drug exposure variability and potential approaches to overcome them, while highlighting existing knowledge gaps and guiding future studies in this area.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Yimitasvir in Chinese Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Yimitasvir is a novel, oral hepatitis C virus (HCV) non-structural protein 5A inhibitor for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. The objective of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of yimitasvir in Chinese healthy volunteers and HCV infection patients. The model was performed using data from 219 subjects across six studies. Nonlinear mixed effects models were developed using Phoenix NLME software. The covariates were evaluated using a stepwise forward inclusion (p < 0.01) and then a backward exclusion procedure (p < 0.001). A two-compartment model with sequential zero-first order absorption and first-order elimination reasonably described yimitasvir pharmacokinetics (PK). The apparent oral clearance and central volume of distribution were 13.8 l·h⁻¹ and 188 l, respectively. The bioavailability (F) of yimitasvir decreased 12.9% for each 100 mg dose increase. Food was found to affect absorption rate (Ka) and F. High-fat meal decreased Ka and F by 90.9% and 38.5%, respectively. Gender and alanine aminotransferase were identified as significant covariates on apparent oral clearance. Female subjects had lower clearance than male subjects. Zero-order absorption duration was longer in healthy volunteers (2.17 h) than that in patients (1.43 h). The population pharmacokinetic model described yimitasvir PK profile well. Food decreased Ka and F significantly, so it was recommended to take yimitasvir at least 2 h before or after a meal. Other significant covariates were not clinically important.

An Investigation into the Factors Governing Drug Absorption and Food Effect Prediction Based on Data Mining Methodology

Drug absorption is a complex process governed by a number of interrelated physicochemical, biopharmaceutical, and pharmacokinetic factors. In order to explore complex relationships among these factors, multivariate exploratory analysis was performed on the dataset of drugs with diverse bioperformance. The investigated dataset included subset of drugs for which bioequivalence between solid dosage form and oral solution has been reported, and subset of drugs described in the literature as low solubility/low permeability compounds. Discriminatory power of hierarchical clustering on principal components was somewhat higher when applied on the data subsets of drugs with similar bioperformance, while analysis of the integrated dataset indicated existence of two groups of drugs with the boundaries reflected in P_eff value of approximately 2 × 10^-4 cm/s and Fa and Fm values higher than 85% and 50%, respectively. Majority of the investigated drugs within the integrated dataset were grouped within their initial subset indicating that overall drug bioperformance is closely related to its physicochemical, biopharmaceutical and pharmacokinetic properties. Classification models constructed using the random forest (RF) and support vector machine with polynomial kernel function were able to predict food effect based on drug dose/solubility ratio (D/S), effective permeability (P_eff), percent of dose metabolized (Fm), and elimination half-life (τ_1/2). Although both models performed well during training and testing, only RF kept satisfying performance when applied on the external dataset (kappa value > 0.4). The results obtained indicate that data mining can be employed as useful tool in biopharmaceutical drug characterization which merits further investigation.

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Yimitasvir Phosphate Capsule, a Novel Oral Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Yimitasvir is a novel oral hepatitis C virus non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor. The aims of this first-in-human study were to evaluate the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single and multiple doses of yimitasvir in healthy adult Chinese volunteers and to assess the effect of food on yimitasvir pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending-dose (30, 100, 200 and 400 mg) and multiple-ascending-dose (100 and 200 mg once daily for 7 days) studies were performed in 32 and 24 subjects, respectively, in male and female adults. Additionally, the effect of food on yimitasvir pharmacokinetics was assessed with a crossover study in 15 male subjects.

RESULTS

Yimitasvir was absorbed slowly after oral administration with a median time to maximum plasma concentration (T_max) of 3.5-4.0 h. Increases in the maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable time point (AUC_0-t) were proportional to the dose of yimitasvir over a dose range of 30-100 mg, while increases were less than dose proportional over a dose range of 200-400 mg in part 1, indicating that absorption at the 200-mg dose was nearly saturated. The geometric mean terminal half-life of yimitasvir was 13.4-19.7 h in each cohort, supporting once-daily dosing. Faecal excretion of parent yimitasvir was the major route of elimination. Steady state was achieved following 5 days of dosing with minimal accumulation. A standardized high-fat meal decreased the rate and extent of absorption. All doses of yimitasvir were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Yimitasvir, at single doses of 30-400 mg and multiple doses of 100-200 mg for 7 days, was well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. The results of this study formed the basis for the dosing schemes evaluated in a phase Ib study and subsequent phase II and phase III clinical studies.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the China Food and Drug Administration (Registration numbers: 2014L02064 and 2014L02065) and at http://www.chictr.org.cn (Nos. CTR20140854, CTR20150048 and CTR20150123).

The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions - A perspective from the UNGAP group

The simultaneous intake of food and drugs can have a strong impact on drug release, absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination and consequently, on the efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy. As such, food-drug interactions are one of the main challenges in oral drug administration. Whereas pharmacokinetic (PK) food-drug interactions can have a variety of causes, pharmacodynamic (PD) food-drug interactions occur due to specific pharmacological interactions between a drug and particular drinks or food. In recent years, extensive efforts were made to elucidate the mechanisms that drive pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions. Their occurrence depends mainly on the properties of the drug substance, the formulation and a multitude of physiological factors. Every intake of food or drink changes the physiological conditions in the human gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, a precise understanding of how different foods and drinks affect the processes of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or elimination as well as formulation performance is important in order to be able to predict and avoid such interactions. Furthermore, it must be considered that beverages such as milk, grapefruit juice and alcohol can also lead to specific food-drug interactions. In this regard, the growing use of food supplements and functional food requires urgent attention in oral pharmacotherapy. Recently, a new consortium in Understanding Gastrointestinal Absorption-related Processes (UNGAP) was established through COST, a funding organisation of the European Union supporting translational research across Europe. In this review of the UNGAP Working group "Food-Drug Interface", the different mechanisms that can lead to pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions are discussed and summarised from different expert perspectives.

Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and First-in-Human Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Velpatasvir, a Pangenotypic Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Inhibitor, in Healthy Subjects

Preclinical characterization of velpatasvir (VEL; GS-5816), an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A protein, demonstrated that it has favorable in vitro and in vivo properties, including potent antiviral activity against hepatitis C virus genotype 1 to 6 replicons, good metabolic stability, low systemic clearance, and adequate bioavailability and physicochemical properties, to warrant clinical evaluation. The phase 1 (first-in-human) study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of VEL in healthy human subjects following administration of single and multiple (n = 7) once-daily ascending doses and of VEL in the presence and absence of food. Following administration of single and multiple doses, VEL was safe and well tolerated when administered at up to 450 mg and when administered with food. The pharmacokinetic behavior of VEL observed in humans was generally in agreement with that seen during preclinical characterization. Following administration of multiple doses, VEL trough concentrations were significantly greater than the protein-adjusted half-maximal (50%) effective concentration of VEL against HCV genotype 1 to 6 replicons at all evaluated doses greater than 5 mg. The pharmacokinetics of VEL were not significantly affected by administration with food. Collectively, the results of this study support the further clinical investigation of VEL administered once daily as part of a regimen with other pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of HCV infection.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole for oral SUBA-itraconazole and sporanox capsule formulations in healthy subjects in fed and fasted states

Itraconazole is an orally active antifungal agent that has complex and highly variable absorption kinetics that is highly affected by food. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for itraconazole and the active metabolite hydroxyitraconazole, in particular, quantifying the effects of food and formulation on oral absorption. Plasma pharmacokinetic data were collected from seven phase I crossover trials comparing the SUBA-itraconazole and Sporanox formulations of itraconazole. First, a model of single-dose itraconazole data was developed, which was then extended to the multidose data. Covariate effects on itraconazole were then examined before extending the model to describe hydroxyitraconazole. The final itraconazole model was a 2-compartment model with oral absorption described by 4-transit compartments. Multidose kinetics was described by total effective daily dose- and time-dependent changes in clearance and bioavailability. Hydroxyitraconazole was best described by a 1-compartment model with mixed first-order and Michaelis-Menten elimination for the single-dose data and a time-dependent clearance for the multidose data. The relative bioavailability of SUBA-itraconazole compared to that of Sporanox was 173% and was 21% less variable between subjects. Food resulted in a 27% reduction in bioavailability and 58% reduction in the transit absorption rate constant compared to that with the fasted state, irrespective of the formulation. This analysis presents the most extensive population pharmacokinetic model of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole in the literature performed in healthy subjects. The presented model can be used for simulating food effects on itraconazole exposure and for performing prestudy power analysis and sample size estimation, which are important aspects of clinical trial design of bioequivalence studies.

Absolute bioavailability and effect of formulation change, food, or elevated pH with rabeprazole on cobimetinib absorption in healthy subjects

Cobimetinib is a potent and highly selective inhibitor of MEK1/2. Since cobimetinib exhibited absorption variability in cancer patients, a series of single-dose studies in healthy subjects were conducted to determine absolute bioavailability and elucidate potential effects of formulation, food, and elevated gastric pH on cobimetinib bioavailability. Three crossover trials were performed with a 20 mg cobimetinib oral dose: absolute bioavailability using a 2 mg intravenous infusion (n = 13), relative bioavailability of tablets versus capsules and food effect (n = 20), and drug interaction with a proton pump inhibitor (20 mg of rabeprazole daily for 5 days prior to cobimetinib administration; n = 20). Absolute bioavailability of cobimetinib was 46.2% (24.2, CV %), likely due to metabolism rather than incomplete absorption. The mean systemic clearance of cobimetinib was low (11.7 L/h [28.2, CV %]). Administration of cobimetinib tablets with a high-fat meal delayed drug absorption (prolonged tmax) but had no statistically significant effect on cobimetinib exposure (Cmax and AUC0-∞). Tablet and capsule formulations of cobimetinib showed comparable exposures. Cobimetinib exhibited delayed absorption (tmax) in the presence of rabeprazole, with no statistically significant effects on drug exposure (Cmax and AUC0-∞) in the fasted state. In conclusion, cobimetinib oral absorption was not affected by change in formulation, food, or elevated gastric pH.

PBPK models for the prediction of in vivo performance of oral dosage forms

Drug absorption from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a highly complex process dependent upon numerous factors including the physicochemical properties of the drug, characteristics of the formulation and interplay with the underlying physiological properties of the GI tract. The ability to accurately predict oral drug absorption during drug product development is becoming more relevant given the current challenges facing the pharmaceutical industry. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling provides an approach that enables the plasma concentration-time profiles to be predicted from preclinical in vitro and in vivo data and can thus provide a valuable resource to support decisions at various stages of the drug development process. Whilst there have been quite a few successes with PBPK models identifying key issues in the development of new drugs in vivo, there are still many aspects that need to be addressed in order to maximize the utility of the PBPK models to predict drug absorption, including improving our understanding of conditions in the lower small intestine and colon, taking the influence of disease on GI physiology into account and further exploring the reasons behind population variability. Importantly, there is also a need to create more appropriate in vitro models for testing dosage form performance and to streamline data input from these into the PBPK models. As part of the Oral Biopharmaceutical Tools (OrBiTo) project, this review provides a summary of the current status of PBPK models available. The current challenges in PBPK set-ups for oral drug absorption including the composition of GI luminal contents, transit and hydrodynamics, permeability and intestinal wall metabolism are discussed in detail. Further, the challenges regarding the appropriate integration of results from in vitro models, such as consideration of appropriate integration/estimation of solubility and the complexity of the in vitro release and precipitation data, are also highlighted as important steps to advancing the application of PBPK models in drug development. It is expected that the "innovative" integration of in vitro data from more appropriate in vitro models and the enhancement of the GI physiology component of PBPK models, arising from the OrBiTo project, will lead to a significant enhancement in the ability of PBPK models to successfully predict oral drug absorption and advance their role in preclinical and clinical development, as well as for regulatory applications.

Understanding pharmacokinetic food effects using molecular dynamics simulation coupled with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

In this study, a molecular dynamics (MD) method is assessed as a new front-end tool for deriving relevant drug-micelle partitioning rates for use in conjunction with a compartmental-style gastrointestinal absorption model. A refined mechanistic approach for handling micelle-associated vs unbound drug is presented and examined in terms of its utility for projecting human oral pharmacokinetic food/formulation effects. Similar to predecessor oral absorption models, the intestinal drug absorption rate is formulated as a function of the combined permeability through the unstirred water layer and the epithelial membrane, however, an additional diffusion coefficient adjustment is applied to account for the viscosity changes of the postprandial small intestine. Bulk passage of drug particles through the GI tract is simulated by compartmental transit through a network of nine compartments comprising the stomach, small intestine and colon. The tandem MD simulation/compartmental absorption algorithm is applied to identify factors influencing the fed vs fasted absorption ratios of a structurally diverse set of orally administered drugs. The data illustrate the interplay and apparent compromise between micelle solubilization and permeability.

Predicting drug disposition, absorption/elimination/transporter interplay and the role of food on drug absorption

The ability to predict drug disposition involves concurrent consideration of many chemical and physiological variables and the effect of food on the rate and extent of availability adds further complexity due to postprandial changes in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. A system that allows for the assessment of the multivariate interplay occurring following administration of an oral dose, in the presence or absence of meal, would greatly benefit the early stages of drug development. This is particularly true in an era when the majority of new molecular entities are highly permeable, poorly soluble, extensively metabolized compounds (BDDCS Class 2), which present the most complicated relationship in defining the impact of transporters due to the marked effects of transporter-enzyme interplay. This review evaluates the GI luminal environment by taking into account the absorption/transport/elimination interplay and evaluates the physiochemical property issues by taking into account the importance of solubility, permeability and metabolism. We concentrate on the BDDCS and its utility in predicting drug disposition. Furthermore, we focus on the effect of food on the extent of drug availability (F), which appears to follow closely what might be expected if a significant effect of high fat meals is inhibition of transporters. That is, high fat meals and lipidic excipients would be expected to have little effect on F for Class 1 drugs; they would increase F of Class 2 drugs, while decreasing F for Class 3 drugs.

Effect of food or antacid on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of febuxostat in healthy subjects

What is already known about this subject. Febuxostat is a novel nonpurine selective inhibitor of xanthine oxidase. What this study adds. This is the first manuscript to address the effect of food and antacid on the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of febuxostat. The study will determine whether the drug can be administered regardless of food or antacid. It will therefore influence how the drug should be administered.

AIMS

To evaluate the effects of food or antacid on the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of febuxostat.

METHODS

Four Phase I, two-period, crossover studies were performed in healthy male and female subjects. Subjects either received single 40-mg (n = 24), multiple 80-mg (n = 24) and single 120-mg (n = 20) doses of febuxostat in fasting and nonfasting conditions, or received single 80-mg (n = 24) doses alone or with antacid.

RESULTS

Food caused a decrease in C(max) (38-49%) and AUC (16-19%) of febuxostat at different dose levels following single or multiple oral dosing with febuxostat. However, a slightly greater percent decrease in serum uric acid concentrations (58% vs. 51%) after multiple dosing with 80 mg of febuxostat under nonfasting conditions was observed, which was statistically (P < 0.05) but not clinically significant. Antacid caused a decrease in C(max) (32%), but had no effect on AUC of febuxostat. Febuxostat was safe and well tolerated in all studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though food caused a decrease in the rate and extent of absorption of febuxostat, this decrease was not associated with a clinically significant change in febuxostat pharmacodynamic effect. Despite a decrease in the absorption rate of febuxostat, antacid had no effect on the extent of febuxostat absorption. Therefore, febuxostat can be administered regardless of food or antacid intake.

Predicting pharmacokinetic food effects using biorelevant solubility media and physiologically based modelling

BACKGROUND

Food-induced changes in gastric emptying time, gastric pH and/or intestinal fluid composition may have an impact on the pharmacokinetics of drugs. The aim of this work was to use mathematical models describing physiology in fed and fasted states together with biorelevant solubility and degradation data to simulate food effects for six compounds from recent Roche projects.

METHODS

The solubility of each compound was measured in different biorelevant media: simulated human gastric fluid for the fasted and fed state, simulated human intestinal fluid for the fasted, fed and high-fat state, and simulated human colonic fluid for the upper and the lower colon. A physiologically based absorption model was developed in GastroPlustrade mark for each compound using permeability, solubility, metabolism and distribution data. By incorporating the appropriate physiological parameters and solubility data into the model, the oral pharmacokinetics of each drug was simulated under fasted, fed and/or high-fat conditions. Predicted and observed plasma concentration-time profiles and food effects were compared for a range of doses to assess the accuracy of the simulations.

RESULTS

The models were able to distinguish between minor and significant food effects. The simulation captured well the magnitude of the food effects and for the six compounds correctly predicted the observed plasma exposure in fasted, fed and high-fat conditions.

CONCLUSION

Biorelevant solubility tests can be used together with physiologically based absorption models to predict clinical food effects caused by solubility and/or dissolution rate limitations.

Avoiding physicochemical artefacts in early ADME-Tox experiments

Recent literature has highlighted the importance of fundamental physicochemical properties in HTS and ADME-Tox: high lipophilicity, low dimethyl sulfoxide solubility, low aqueous solubility, aggregation and nonspecific binding to proteins and phospholipids. Unless carefully controlled for, each of these artefacts can confound individual ADME-Tox results and their interpretation on aggregate. This article reviews the impact of these phenomena and suggests experimental strategies for minimizing the magnitude and frequency of these artefacts without compromising the essential speed of the experimental process. Many of the concepts translate directly to the HTS context.

Population pharmacokinetics of indinavir alone and in combination with ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients

AIMS

The aim of the study was to characterize the population pharmacokinetics of indinavir, define the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of indinavir and ritonavir, and to identify the factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of indinavir alone or when given with ritonavir.

METHODS

HIV-1-infected patients being treated with an indinavir-containing regimen were included. During regular visits, 102 blood samples were collected for the determination of plasma indinavir and ritonavir concentrations. Full pharmacokinetic curves were available from 45 patients. Concentrations of indinavir and ritonavir were determined by liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effect modelling (NONMEM).

RESULTS

The disposition of indinavir was best described by a single compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. Values for the clearance, volume of distribution and the absorption rate constant were 46.8 l h(-1) (24.2% IIV), 82.3 l (24.6% IIV) and 02.62 h(-1), respectively. An absorption lag-time of 0.485 h was detected in patients also taking ritonavir. Furthermore this drug, independent of dose (100-400 mg) or plasma concentration, decreased the clearance of indinavir by 64.6%. In contrast, co-administration of efavirenz or nevirapine increased the clearance of indinavir by 41%, irrespective of the presence or absence of ritonavir. Female patients had a 48% higher apparent bioavailability of indinavir than males.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetic parameters of indinavir were adequately described by our population model. Female gender and concomitant use of ritonavir and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors strongly influenced the pharmacokinetics of this drug. The results support the concept of ritonavir boosting, maximum inhibition of indinavir metabolized being observed at 100 mg.

Classification of orally administered drugs on the World Health Organization Model list of Essential Medicines according to the biopharmaceutics classification system

Since its inception in 1995, the biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) has become an increasingly important tool for regulation of drug products world-wide. Until now, application of the BCS has been partially hindered by the lack of a freely available and accurate database summarising solubility and permeability characteristics of drug substances. In this report, orally administered drugs on the Model list of Essential Medicines of the World Health Organization (WHO) are assigned BCS classifications on the basis of data available in the public domain. Of the 130 orally administered drugs on the WHO list, 61 could be classified with certainty. Twenty-one (84%) of these belong to class I (highly soluble, highly permeable), 10 (17%) to class II (poorly soluble, highly permeable), 24 (39%) to class III (highly soluble, poorly permeable) and 6 (10%) to class IV (poorly soluble, poorly permeable). A further 28 drugs could be provisionally assigned, while for 41 drugs insufficient or conflicting data precluded assignment to a specific BCS class. A total of 32 class I drugs (either certain or provisional classification) were identified. These drugs can be further considered for biowaiver status (drug product approval based on dissolution tests rather than bioequivalence studies in humans).

Magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that gastric pH would be elevated above pH 3.0 for at least 2 hours after administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets. Doses tested were 200 mg (two 100-mg tablets) and 400 mg (two 200-mg tablets). We also sought to compare these doses with regard to maximum gastric pH (pHmax), time to pHmax (TpH-max), time that gastric pH exceeds 3.0 (TpH>3), and area under the gastric pH versus time curve for pH greater than 3.0 (AUCT>pH 3).

DESIGN

Prospective, parallel-group, dose-comparison, gastric pH study.

SETTING

General Clinical Research Center, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

PATIENTS

Nineteen patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus, aged 30-62 years, and receiving long-term didanosine therapy.

INTERVENTION

Patients underwent continuous gastric pH monitoring, using the Heidelberg capsule radiotelemetric pH monitoring device. After documentation of a fasting baseline gastric pH below 3.0, patients were given 180 ml of water (control phase), and gastric pH was allowed to return to baseline. After administration of a single, oral dose of didanosine 200 mg or 400 mg with 180 ml of water, gastric pH was recorded until pH remained below 3.0 for 10 minutes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A mean pHmax of 8.6 (range 6.3-9.5) was achieved with a TpH-max of 4.1 minutes (range 1-12.0 min). Mean TpH>3 was 24.9 minutes (range 15-55 min), with an AUCT>pH 3 of 2.6 pH x min(-1) (range 1.2-6.9 pH x min(-1)). The two doses of didanosine tested did not differ significantly in mean gastric pH parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

After administration of chewable, dispersible, buffered didanosine tablets, 200 or 400 mg, the mean duration of elevated gastric pH (TpH>3) was less than 30 minutes, with a range of 15-55 minutes. Characterization of the magnitude and duration of elevated gastric pH may allow for earlier administration of other pH-sensitive drugs. The short duration of elevated gastric pH may help explain the wide variability in didanosine bioavailability observed clinically.

Population pharmacokinetics of indinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Indinavir is currently used at a fixed dose of 800 mg either three times a day or twice a day in combination with 100 mg of ritonavir. Dosage individualization based on plasma concentration monitoring might, however, be indicated. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of indinavir in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus to characterize interpatient and intrapatient variability and to build up a Bayesian approach for dosage adaptation. A population analysis was performed with the NONMEM computer program with 569 plasma samples from a cohort of 239 unselected patients receiving indinavir. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption was adapted, and the influences of clinical characteristics on oral clearance (CL) and distribution volume (V) were examined. Predicted average drug exposure and trough and peak concentrations were derived for each patient and correlated with efficacy and toxicity markers. The population estimates of CL were 32.4 liters/h for female and 42.0 liters/h for male patients; oral V was 65.7 liters; and the rate constant of absorption (K(a)) was 1.0 h(-1). CL decreased by 63% with ritonavir intake and was moderately correlated to body weight. Both interpatient variability, best assigned to oral CL (coefficient of variation [CV], 39%) and K(a) (CV, 67%), and intrapatient variability were large (CV, 41%; standard deviation, 670 microg/liter). In conclusion, initial indinavir dosage should be decided according to ritonavir intake and sex, prior to plasma concentration measurements. The high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability represents an argument for therapeutic drug monitoring.

In-vitro crystallization of indinavir in the presence of ritonavir and as a function of pH

The aim of this study was to investigate the in-vitro crystallization of indinavir as a function of pH alteration and in the presence of another protease inhibitor, ritonavir. Crystallization processes were studied for indinavir sulfate, indinavir free base and a commercial indinavir capsule dosage form, respectively. Crystallization induction times were determined with varying initial concentration of supersaturated solution, and in the presence or absence of seed material. In-vitro induction times were found to be significantly shorter for the indinavir capsule dosage form compared with that of indinavir sulfate and indinavir free base. Induction times were inversely proportional to the final concentration in pH 7 buffer for all materials, and were significantly shortened in the presence of seeds. The crystal morphology of indinavir varied under different crystallization conditions. This study demonstrated the potential for precipitation of indinavir upon pH elevation, while also suggesting that the presence of impurities or seeding material significantly shortens the induction time for indinavir crystal formation. This induction time period falls well within the gastric emptying time following the intake of a high-caloric meal, and within small intestinal transit time. The results of this study are in agreement with the clinical observation that a high-calorie protein meal significantly reduces the oral bioavailability of indinavir in man, accompanying a pH elevation in the stomach.

Apricot extract inhibits the P-gp-mediated efflux of talinolol

Within the framework of developing strategies to enhance the intestinal absorption of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrates, the modulatory effect of a standardized apricot extract on P-gp-related efflux carriers was investigated in the Caco-2 system, Ussing chambers and the rat in situ perfusion model using talinolol as a model substrate. Using the Caco-2 system, polarity in transport of talinolol could be observed, the absorptive transport being much lower than the secretory transport (P(app-abs) = 1.08 +/- 0.29 x 10(-6) cm/s and P(app-secr) = 11.74 +/- 0.80 x 10(-6) cm/s). Inclusion of apricot extract (1%) in the apical medium resulted in a statistically significantly diminished polarity (P(app-abs) = 4.88 +/- 0.96 x 10(-6) cm/s and P(app-secr) = 9.39 +/- 0.58 x 10(-6) cm/s, p < 0.05). In addition, the inhibitory effect of apricot extract on P-gp related efflux mechanisms was shown to be concentration (0% approximately 0.1% < 0.3% < 1%) and pH dependent. Experiments performed with the Ussing chambers resulted in similar observations. In the rat in situ perfusion model, inclusion of apricot extract (1%) in the perfusion medium resulted in a threefold increase of the amount of talinolol appearing in the collected blood compared to the reference condition (23.6 +/- 5.53 pmol/cm. min and 7.13 +/- 1.08 pmol/cm. min, respectively; p < 0.05). Coadministration of this standardized apricot extract might be a safe and useful strategy to enhance the intestinal absorption of P-gp substrates. The nature and structure of the compound(s) responsible for this inhibiting effect on P-gp-related efflux carriers remain to be elucidated, as well as the exact mechanism by which apricot extract exerts its inhibitory function.

A mechanistic approach to understanding the factors affecting drug absorption: a review of fundamentals

This article provides an overview of the patient-specific and drug-specific variables that can affect drug absorption following oral product administration. The oral absorption of any chemical entity reflects a complex spectrum of events. Factors influencing product bioavailability include drug solubility, permeability, and the rate of in vivo dissolution. In this regard, the Biopharmaceutics Classification System has proven to be an important tool for predicting compounds likely to be associated with bioavailability problems. It also helps in identifying those factors that may alter the rate and extent of drug absorption. Product bioavailability can also be markedly influenced by patient attributes such as the integrity of the gastrointestinal tract, physiological status, site of drug absorption, membrane transporters, presystemic drug metabolism (intrinsic variables), and extrinsic variables such as the effect of food or concomitant medication. Through an awareness of a drug's physicochemical properties and the physiological processes affecting drug absorption, the skilled pharmaceutical scientist can develop formulations that will maximize product availability. By appreciating the potential impact of patient physiological status, phenotype, age, gender, and lifestyle, dosing regimens can be tailored to better meet the needs of the individual patient.

Intestinal metabolism promotes regional differences in apical uptake of indinavir: coupled effect of P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P450 3A on indinavir membrane permeability in rat

The purpose of this study was to investigate transport and metabolism contributions to low indinavir permeability in rat ileum and enhanced drug permeability in the jejunum. Permeability models utilized included single pass in situ rat intestinal perfusion and rat intestinal tissue mounted in Ussing chambers. Intestinal metabolism was measured by fractional appearance of metabolite (F(met)), determined as the percentage of the predominant metabolite M6 over luminal loss of indinavir in the perfusion model. Among the results, indinavir exhibited bidirectional transport across rat ileum. Verapamil and cyclosporin A inhibited net flux by 37 and 38%, respectively. Intestinal metabolism of indinavir was most significant in upper jejunum (F(met) = 65.78 +/- 19.02%), decreasing in midjejunum (F(met) = 31.58 +/- 5.63%). M6 was not detectable in ileum or colon. Western blot analysis of rat intestinal mucosal tissue samples confirmed that the axial expression of CYP3A was consistent with the regional pattern of formation of M6. Intestinal metabolism was saturable and could be inhibited by the CYP3A inhibitor, ketoconazole. A low luminal concentration of indinavir (1 microM) was associated with high F(met) (87.90 +/- 14.30%), whereas a high luminal concentration of indinavir (50 microM) was associated with low F(met) (35.84 +/- 11.59%). In the presence of ketoconazole, both F(met) and permeability of indinavir were reduced in the jejunum. These results suggest that 1) intracellular metabolism of indinavir enhances apical uptake of indinavir in the rat jejunum as a function of the increased concentration gradient generated across the epithelial cell membrane and 2) the efflux transporter P-glycoprotein limits apical uptake of indinavir in the ileum, resulting in low apparent permeability.

Combination of Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Experience

The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the combination of at least three different antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, has greatly improved the prognosis for HIV-1-infected patients. The efficacy of a combination of a protease inhibitor (PI) plus two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been well established over a period of up to 3 years. However, virological treatment failure has been reported in 40–60% of unselected patients within 1 year after initiation of a PI-containing regimen. This observation may, at least in part, be attributed to the poor pharmacokinetic characteristics of the PIs. Given as a single agent the PIs have several pharmacokinetic limitations; relatively short plasma-elimination half-lives and a modest and variable oral bioavailability, which is, for some of the PIs, influenced by food. To overcome these suboptimal pharmacokinetics, high doses (requiring large numbers of pills) must be ingested, often with food restrictions, which complicates patient adherence to the prescribed regimen.

Positive drug–drug interactions increase the exposure to the PIs, allowing administration of lower doses at reduced dosing frequencies with less dietary restrictions. In addition to increasing the potency of an antiretroviral regimen, combinations of PIs may enhance patient adherence, both of which will contribute to a more durable suppression of viral replication. The favourable pharmacokinetics of PIs in combination are a result of interactions through cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzymes and, possibly, the multi-drug transporting P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Antiretroviral synergy between PIs and non-overlapping primary resistance patterns in the HIV-1 protease genome may further enhance the anti-retroviral potency and durability of combinations of PIs. Many combinations contain ritonavir because this PI has the most pronounced inhibiting effects on CYP3A4. The combination of saquinavir and ritonavir, both in a dose of 400 mg twice-a-day, is the most studied double PI combination, with clinical experience extending over 3 years. Combination of a PI with a low dose of ritonavir (≤400 mg/day), only to boost its pharmacokinetic properties, seems an attractive option for patients who cannot tolerate higher doses of ritonavir. A recently introduced PI, lopinavir, has been co-formulated with low-dose ritonavir, which allows for a convenient three-capsules, twice-a-day dosing regimen. In an attempt to prolong suppression of viral replication combinations of PIs are becoming increasingly popular. However, further clinical studies are needed to identify the optimal combinations for treatment of antiretroviral naive and experienced HIV-1-infected patients. This review covers combinations of saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, amprenavir and lopinavir with different doses of ritonavir, as well as the combinations of saquinavir and indinavir with nelfinavir.

Effects of grapefruit juice on pharmacokinetic exposure to indinavir in HIV-positive subjects

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of double-strength grapefruit juice on gastric pH and systemic bioavailability of indinavir in HIV-infected subjects receiving indinavir. Fourteen HIV-infected subjects took 800 mg of indinavir with 6 ounces (180 ml) of water or double-strength grapefruit juice. Gastric pH was measured and blood samples were collected for 5 hours after indinavir dosing. Grapefruit juice increased the mean gastric pH (from 1.39 +/- 0.4 to 3.20 +/- 0.3; p < 0.05) and slightly delayed the absorption of indinavir (tmax increased from 1.12 +/- 0.8 h to 1.56 +/- 0.6 h; p < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in indinavir exposure. Cmax was 16.7 +/- 7.3 microM with water versus 13.9 +/- 4.2 microM with grapefruit juice (p = NS), and AUC0-8 was 37.5 +/- 19 with water versus 36.9 +/- 15 with grapefruit juice (p = NS). The authors concluded that concomitant administration of grapefruit juice increases gastric pH and delays indinavir absorption but does not uniformly affect the systemic bioavailability of indinavir in HIV-infected subjects.

Pharmacological basis for concentration-controlled therapy with zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir

Conventional antiretroviral therapy involves administration of standard fixed doses to adults and adolescents. This approach ignores interindividual variability in pharmacokinetics and results in substantial differences in systemic concentrations among patients. Thus, variability in systemic concentrations contributes to variability in response to therapy. This study was designed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir designed to achieve select target concentrations versus standard dose therapy. Twenty-four antiretroviral-naïve subjects completed the 24-week study; 13 received standard therapy, and 11 received concentration-controlled therapy. There were no differences in baseline characteristics. Oral clearance for all three drugs was not different between weeks 2 and 28; average ratios of week 2 oral clearance to week 28 oral clearance were 0.95, 1.09, and 1.06 for zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals including 1. The selected target concentrations were average steady-state concentrations of 0.19 mg/liter for zidovudine and 0.44 mg/liter for lamivudine and a trough concentration of 0.15 mg/liter for indinavir; mean concentrations achieved at week 28 in the concentration-controlled arm were 0.20, 0.54, and 0.19 mg/liter, respectively. Concentration-controlled therapy significantly reduced interpatient variability in zidovudine concentrations and significantly increased indinavir concentrations. There was no difference in adverse drug effects or adherence. This investigation has provided a pharmacologic basis for concentration-controlled therapy by demonstrating that it is feasible and has a safety profile no different from that of standard therapy. Additional studies to evaluate the virologic effect of the concentration-controlled approach to antiretroviral therapy are warranted.

Indinavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection

Indinavir is a protease inhibitor used in the treatment of patients with HIV infection. Combination antiretroviral therapy with indinavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is associated with greater reductions in viral load, greater increases in CD4+ cell counts, and reduced morbidity and mortality when compared with 2 NRTIs alone. In the landmark clinical trial ACTG 320, the rate of progression to AIDS or death (primary end-point) among zidovudine-experienced patients treated with indinavir, zidovudine and lamivudine was approximately half that of patients who received only zidovudine plus lamivudine (6 vs 11%; p < 0.001). The durability of an indinavir-containing regimen was demonstrated in Merck protocol 035, an ongoing trial in which a significant proportion of patients had sustained viral suppression for up to 3 years. Merck protocol 039, also an ongoing trial, showed a greater effect on surrogate markers of HIV disease progression with indinavir-based triple therapy than with zidovudine plus lamivudine or indinavir monotherapy in patients with advanced disease (median baseline CD4+ count 15 cells/microL). Numerous additional clinical trials have established the beneficial antiviral and immunological effects of indinavir in both antiretroviral-naive and -experienced patients with HIV infection. Indinavir is associated with various drug class-related adverse events, including gastrointestinal disturbances (e.g. nausea, diarrhoea), headache and asthenia/fatigue. A lipodystrophy syndrome has been commonly reported with indinavir and other protease inhibitors combined with NRTIs, but it has also been reported in many protease inhibitor-naive patients, and a definitive causal link has not been established between the syndrome and protease inhibitors. Nephrolithiasis may develop in about 9% of patients receiving indinavir but does not appear to be associated with other protease inhibitors; <0.5% of patients receiving indinavir discontinue the drug because of nephrolithiasis, which may be the extreme end of a continuum of crystal-related renal syndromes. Additional renal problems (e.g. nephropathy) have been reported in small numbers of patients receiving indinavir. In summary, indinavir is a protease inhibitor with well documented efficacy when used as part of combined therapy in patients with HIV infection. Both US and UK treatment guidelines continue to recommend protease inhibitor-based regimens including indinavir as a first-line option. Indinavir is being studied as a twice daily and once daily regimen with a low dosage of ritonavir as a way to alleviate tolerability, drug interaction and patient compliance/adherence issues. Indinavir-containing triple therapy has demonstrated positive effects not only on surrogate markers of disease progression, but also on clinical end-points of mortality and morbidity in patients with HIV disease. Protease inhibitors are a significant advance in the care of patients with HIV infection, and, in an era of evidence-based medicine, indinavir represents an important component of antiretroviral treatment strategies.

Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration. Clinical implications

Drug-drug, drug-formulation and drug-meal interactions are of clinical concern for orally administered drugs that possess a narrow therapeutic index. This review presents the current status of information regarding interactions which may influence the gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of orally administered drugs. Absorption interactions have been classified on the basis of rate-limiting processes. These processes are put in the context of drug and formulation physicochemical properties and oral input influences on variable GI physiology. Interaction categorisation makes use of a biopharmaceutical classification system based on drug aqueous solubility and membrane permeability and their contributions towards absorption variability. Overlaying this classification it is important to be aware of the effect that the magnitudes of drug dosage and volume of fluid administration can have on interactions involving a solubility rate limits. GI regional differences in membrane permeability are fundamental to the rational development of extended release dosage forms as well as to predicting interaction effects on absorption from immediate release dosage forms. The effect of meals on the regional-dependent intestinal elimination of drugs and their involvement in drug absorption interactions is also discussed. Although the clinical significance of such interactions is certainly dependent on the narrowness of the drug therapeutic index, clinical aspects of absorption delays and therapeutic failures resulting from various interactions are also important.