Medical management of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas

Past, Present, and Future of Therapies for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors: Need for Omics and Drug Repositioning Guidance

Innovation roadmaps are important, because they encourage the actors in an innovation ecosystem to creatively imagine multiple possible science future(s), while anticipating the prospects and challenges on the innovation trajectory. In this overarching context, this expert review highlights the present unmet need for therapeutic innovations for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs), also known as pituitary adenomas. Although there are many drugs used in practice to treat PitNETs, many of these drugs can have negative side effects and show highly variable outcomes in terms of overall recovery. Building innovation roadmaps for PitNETs' treatments can allow incorporation of systems biology approaches to bring about insights at multiple levels of cell biology, from genes to proteins to metabolites. Using the systems biology techniques, it will then be possible to offer potential therapeutic strategies for the convergence of preventive approaches and patient-centered disease treatment. Here, we first provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular subtypes of PitNETs and therapeutics for these tumors from the past to the present. We then discuss examples of clinical trials and drug repositioning studies and how multi-omics studies can help in discovery and rational development of new therapeutics for PitNETs. Finally, this expert review offers new public health and personalized medicine approaches on cases that are refractory to conventional treatment or recur despite currently used surgical and/or drug therapy.

Functional characterization of DLK1/MEG3 locus on chromosome 14q32.2 reveals the differentiation of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) represent the neoplastic proliferation of the anterior pituitary gland. Transcription factors play a key role in the differentiation of PitNETs. However, for a substantial proportion of PitNETs, the etiology is poorly understood. According to the transcription data of 172 patients, we found the imprinting disorders of the 14q32.2 region and DLK1/MEG3 locus associated with the differentiation of PitNETs. DLK1/MEG3 locus promoted somatotroph differentiation and inhibited tumor proliferation in PIT1(+) patients, furthermore, the level of DLK1 played a critical role in the trend of somatotroph or lactotroph differentiation. Anti-DLK1 monoclonal antibody blockade or siMEG3 both indicated that the DLK1/MEG3 significantly promoted the synthesis and secretion of GH/IGF-1 and inhibited cell proliferation. In addition, loss of DLK1 activated the mTOR signaling pathway in high DLK1-expressing and PIT1(+) GH3 cell lines, a mild effect in the low DLK1-expressing and PIT1(+) MMQ cell lines and no effect in the PIT1(-) ATT20 cell line. These findings emphasize that expression at the DLK1/MEG3 locus plays a key role in the differentiation of PitNETs, especially somatotroph adenomas, and provide potential molecular target data for patient stratification and treatment in the future.

CDKN2A (p16INK4A) affects the anti‑tumor effect of CDK inhibitor in somatotroph adenomas

The altered cell cycle is associated with aberrant growth factor signaling in somatotroph adenoma, which is the primary cause of acromegaly. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pathological role of the INK4 family and evaluate the effectiveness of CDK4 inhibitor, palbociclib, in somatotroph adenoma. RNA-Seq, RT-PCR, and immunohisto-chemistry were applied to measure the levels and correlations of the INK4 family with angiogenesis, CDKs, EMT, and therapeutic targets. MTS, flow cytometry, and ELISA were used to investigate the bio-activity in GH3 and GT1-1 cell lines after palbociclib treatment. Compared with lactotroph adenoma, gonadotroph adenoma, and corticotroph adenoma, somatotroph samples demonstrated higher expression of CDKN2Aand SSTR2 but a lower expression of EGFR, CDK4, and CDH2 (P<0.05). CDKN2A positively correlates with SSTR2, and negatively with CDK4, EGFR, and CDH2. Patients with lower CDKN2A had larger tumor size (P=0.016) and more invasive potential (P=0.023). Palbociclib inhibited cell proliferation, induced G1 phase arrest, reduced GH/IGF-1 secretion of GH3 and GT1-1 cell lines (P<0.05), and had a more prominent role in GH3 cells (P<0.05). CDKN2A inhibited the bio-activity by modulating CDK4, and high CDKN2A predicted the insensitivity to CDK4 inhibitor, palbociclib, in somatotroph adenoma patients. In summary, the present study shows CDKN2A inhibited the bio-activity by modulating CDK4, and high CDKN2A predicts the insensitivity to CDK4 inhibitor, Palbociclib, in somatotroph adenoma patients.

Safety and efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for acromegaly: an International Multi-Institutional Study

PURPOSE

Surgical resection is the first line treatment for growth hormone (GH) secreting tumors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients who do not achieve endocrine remission after resection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of repeat radiosurgery for acromegaly.

METHODS

Three hundred and ninety-eight patients with acromegaly treated with the Gamma Knife radiosurgery (Elekta AB, Stockholm) were identified from the International Gamma Knife Research Foundation database. Among these, 21 patients underwent repeated SRS with sufficient endocrine follow-up and 18 patients had sufficient imaging follow-up. Tumor control was defined as lack of adenoma progression on imaging. Endocrine remission was defined as a normal IGF-1 concentration while off medical therapy.

RESULTS

Median time from initial SRS to repeat SRS was 5.0 years. The median imaging and endocrine follow-up duration after repeat SRS was 3.4 and 3.8 years, respectively. The median initial marginal dose was 17 Gy, and the median repeat marginal dose was 23 Gy. Of the 18 patients with adequate imaging follow up, 15 (83.3%) patients had tumor control and of 21 patients with endocrine follow-up, 9 (42.9%) patients had endocrine remission at last follow-up visit. Four patients (19.0%) developed new deficits after repeat radiosurgery. Of these, 3 patients had neurologic deficits and 1 patient had endocrine deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat radiosurgery for persistent acromegaly offers a reasonable benefit to risk profile for this challenging patient cohort. Further studies are needed to identify patients best suited for this type of approach.

The effect of acute application of pegvisomant alone and in combination with octreotide on endogenous GH levels during a 6-h test in patients with acromegaly on constant pegvisomant treatment

OBJECTIVE

Co-treatment with somatostatin analogues and growth hormone receptor antagonists in acromegaly might be a new treatment option abolishing the negative effects of monotherapy. Nevertheless, little is known about the acute effect of the combined treatment on endogenous GH and pegvisomant levels.

DESIGN

Ten acromegalic patients on constant pegvisomant therapy were included. Two 6-h GH secretion profiles were performed once after pegvisomant alone (P), the other after an additional 100 microg octreotide sc injection (PO). After 180 min, all patients received a standardized light mixed meal. Endogenous serum GH and pegvisomant levels were measured by special in-house assays. In addition, insulin and glucose were measured.

RESULTS

In the combined profile PO, a significant decrease of median endogenous GH was seen (p<0.01, median percentage decline 75.2%, range 23.7-88.2), which was not seen in profile P. Seven of 10 patients had a decline >70% and might be seen as responders. After meal, endogenous GH significantly decreased only in profile P (p<0.01). Pegvisomant levels did not differ significantly between profiles and did not change significantly during the tests. After meal, glucose levels rose higher and later and insulin levels lower and later in profile PO than in profile P.

CONCLUSION

During pegvisomant treatment, endogenous GH can be reduced significantly by acute application of a somatostatin analogue. Therefore, in acromegalic patients on pegvisomant therapy GH regulation due to somatostatin analogues seems to be preserved.

Selective loss of somatostatin receptor 2 in octreotide-resistant growth hormone-secreting adenomas

OBJECTIVE

The somatostatin analog octreotide preferentially binds to somatostatin receptor (sst) 2A and to a lesser extent to sst5. Although sst2A and sst5 mRNAs are consistently expressed in GH-secreting adenomas, octreotide controls GH secretion only in 65% of acromegalic patients. Hence, we investigated the immunocytochemical expression of sst in a large group of somatotroph tumors.

METHODS

Acromegalic patients, cared for in a university referral center, were either operated on without pretreatment (group A, n = 14) or pretreated with octreotide [median (minimum-maximum): dose 1250 (300-1500) mug/d for 5.6 (3-9) months] before surgery (group B, n = 20). In group B octreotide reduced GH secretion by more than 50% in 14 patients (70%) (GH responders). Six patients with less than 50% GH suppression were considered GH nonresponders. We used a panel of extensively characterized antibodies to determine the immunocytochemical sst status in somatotroph adenomas and compared their expression between the groups.

RESULTS

All group A tumors demonstrated immunoreactive sst2A, and all but one had sst5. A similar pattern was found in the GH responders of group B. In contrast, none of the GH nonresponders exhibited detectable sst2A (sst2A: GH responders vs. GH nonresponders, P < 0.0001), whereas sst5 was found in 70%. sst1 and sst3 were detected in 85 and 24% of all cases, independent of previous octreotide treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that octreotide resistance in GH-secreting adenomas occurs due to a selective loss of sst2A. The persistent expression of sst1 and sst5 receptors suggests that these tumors are potential targets for pan-somatostatin analogs.

A case and review of acromegaly-induced cardiomyopathy and the relationship between growth hormone and heart failure: cause or cure or neither or both?

Growth hormone plays an integral role in the development and maintenance of structure and function of the heart. Specific involvement of the heart in acromegaly is termed acromegalic cardiomyopathy, manifested as concentric left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dys-function. Left untreated, it ultimately progresses to systolic heart failure. Heart failure from acromegalic cardiomyopathy is one of the most common causes of death in acromegaly. Current treatment options include different approaches to lower elevated growth hormone levels with improvement in symptoms, exercise tolerance, and echocardiographic improvement in regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and indices of diastolic dysfunction. On the other hand, growth hormone is essential for cardiac growth and function and exerts beneficial and protective effects on the cardiovascular system. Its potential role as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of heart failure as derived from experimental studies and clinical trials is discussed.

Pharmacokinetics and population pharmacodynamic analysis of lanreotide Autogel

Somatostatin analogs are the first-line medical therapy for acromegaly, and the treatment of this disease has been simplified by the development of extended-release formulations of these analogs. Lanreotide is a somatostatin analog that is available either as the microparticle formulation, requiring 7- to 14-day dosing, or as the aqueous Autogel formulation, requiring 28-day dosing. This study investigated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lanreotide. Patients with acromegaly were given 5 injections of lanreotide microparticles, 30 mg, followed by 3 injections of lanreotide Autogel, at doses of 60, 90, or 120 mg every 28 days. The study was extended to a further 12 injections of lanreotide Autogel with dose titration. A total of 144 patients were recruited; 130 received 3 injections of lanreotide Autogel, and 130 completed the extension phase. Average minimum lanreotide concentrations (Cmin) at steady state were 1.949 +/- 0.619, 2.685 +/- 0.783, and 3.575 +/- 1.271 ng/mL for 60, 90, and 120 mg of lanreotide Autogel, respectively, showing a dose-proportional increase. Population pharmacodynamic analysis showed that the relationship between either formulation of lanreotide and serum growth hormone (GH) concentrations was best described using an inhibitory maximum response (Emax) model that allowed for the possibility of an incomplete inhibition of GH. Lanreotide elicited a maximum reduction in GH of 82%. Because patients were already being treated, baseline GH (E0) was estimated, and the value of 8.63 ng/mL was in agreement with the inclusion criteria of GH 10 ng/mL or less. The effectiveness of treatment was demonstrated by the median serum concentration of lanreotide, 1.13 ng/mL, required to lower GH to 2.5 ng/mL or less. The serum concentration that elicited half of the Emax (EC50) was estimated as 0.206 ng/mL, showing a high sensitivity to lanreotide, with a predictably high interpatient variability of 200.75% reflecting the range of dosing regimens needed to control GH.

Somatostatin analogues: multiple roles in cellular proliferation, neoplasia, and angiogenesis

Angiogenesis, the development of new blood vessels is a crucial process both for tumor growth and metastatic dissemination. Additionally, dysregulation in angiogenesis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, proliferative retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The neuropeptide somatostatin has been shown to be a powerful inhibitor of neovascularization in several experimental models. Furthermore, somatostatin receptors (sst) are expressed on endothelial cells; particularly, sst2 has been found to be uniquely up-regulated during the angiogenic switch, from quiescent to proliferative endothelium. The present manuscript reviews the anti-angiogenic activity of somatostatin and its analogues in neoplastic and nonneoplastic disease. The role of sst subtypes particularly sst2 in mediating its angioinhibitory activity is described. Somatostatin agonists may also exert their anti-angiogenic activity indirectly by inhibition of growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) axis or through its immunomodulatory effects. However, the therapeutic utility of somatostatin agonists as anti-angiogenic drugs in these diseases remains confusing because of conflicting results from different studies. More basic research, as well as patient-oriented studies, is required to firmly establish the clinical potential of somatostatin agonists in therapeutic angiogenesis. The currently available somatostatin agonists have high affinity of sst2 with lower affinities for sst3 and sst5. The emergence of novel somatostatin agonists especially bispecific analogues (agonists targeting multiple cellular receptors) and conjugates (synthesized by chemically linking somatostatin analogues with other antineoplastic agents) with improved receptor specificity signify a new generation of anti-angiogenics, which may represent novel strategies in the treatment of neovascularization-related diseases.

Diagnóstico e tratamento da acromegalia no Brasil

Acromegalia é uma doença debilitante e desfigurante que, se não controlada adequadamente, reduz a expectativa de vida do paciente. Complicações cardiovasculares e respiratórias representam as principais causas de morte nos acromegálicos. Atualmente, o diagnóstico é realizado de acordo com as diretrizes do consenso de 2000: ausência de supressão do GH para um valor <1ng/mL e IGF-1 elevado. Avanços em todas as modalidades terapêuticas têm ocorrido, propiciando o controle bioquímico da doença em um número cada vez maior de pacientes. Estudos prévios mostraram que a obtenção de níveis seguros de GH (GH médio <2,5ng/mL) e de IGF-1 normal reduz a taxa de mortalidade para o normal. Em 2002, foram publicadas diretrizes para o manejo da acromegalia, o qual envolve, muitas vezes, uma abordagem multidisciplinar. Neste artigo, fazemos uma avaliação crítica do que dispomos no Brasil para seguirmos as diretrizes estabelecidas nos consensos sobre diagnóstico e tratamento da acromegalia.