1
|
Hakkaart C, Pearson JF, Marquart L, Dennis J, Wiggins GAR, Barnes DR, Robinson BA, Mace PD, Aittomäki K, Andrulis IL, Arun BK, Azzollini J, Balmaña J, Barkardottir RB, Belhadj S, Berger L, Blok MJ, Boonen SE, Borde J, Bradbury AR, Brunet J, Buys SS, Caligo MA, Campbell I, Chung WK, Claes KBM, Collonge-Rame MA, Cook J, Cosgrove C, Couch FJ, Daly MB, Dandiker S, Davidson R, de la Hoya M, de Putter R, Delnatte C, Dhawan M, Diez O, Ding YC, Domchek SM, Donaldson A, Eason J, Easton DF, Ehrencrona H, Engel C, Evans DG, Faust U, Feliubadaló L, Fostira F, Friedman E, Frone M, Frost D, Garber J, Gayther SA, Gehrig A, Gesta P, Godwin AK, Goldgar DE, Greene MH, Hahnen E, Hake CR, Hamann U, Hansen TVO, Hauke J, Hentschel J, Herold N, Honisch E, Hulick PJ, Imyanitov EN, Isaacs C, Izatt L, Izquierdo A, Jakubowska A, James PA, Janavicius R, John EM, Joseph V, Karlan BY, Kemp Z, Kirk J, Konstantopoulou I, Koudijs M, Kwong A, Laitman Y, Lalloo F, Lasset C, Lautrup C, Lazaro C, Legrand C, Leslie G, Lesueur F, Mai PL, Manoukian S, Mari V, Martens JWM, McGuffog L, Mebirouk N, Meindl A, Miller A, Montagna M, Moserle L, Mouret-Fourme E, Musgrave H, Nambot S, Nathanson KL, Neuhausen SL, Nevanlinna H, Yie JNY, Nguyen-Dumont T, Nikitina-Zake L, Offit K, Olah E, Olopade OI, Osorio A, Ott CE, Park SK, Parsons MT, Pedersen IS, Peixoto A, Perez-Segura P, Peterlongo P, Pocza T, Radice P, Ramser J, Rantala J, Rodriguez GC, Rønlund K, Rosenberg EH, Rossing M, Schmutzler RK, Shah PD, Sharif S, Sharma P, Side LE, Simard J, Singer CF, Snape K, Steinemann D, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Sutter C, Tan YY, Teixeira MR, Teo SH, Thomassen M, Thull DL, Tischkowitz M, Toland AE, Trainer AH, Tripathi V, Tung N, van Engelen K, van Rensburg EJ, Vega A, Viel A, Walker L, Weitzel JN, Wevers MR, Chenevix-Trench G, Spurdle AB, Antoniou AC, Walker LC. Copy number variants as modifiers of breast cancer risk for BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. Commun Biol 2022; 5:1061. [PMID: 36203093 PMCID: PMC9537519 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03978-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The contribution of germline copy number variants (CNVs) to risk of developing cancer in individuals with pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants remains relatively unknown. We conducted the largest genome-wide analysis of CNVs in 15,342 BRCA1 and 10,740 BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers. We used these results to prioritise a candidate breast cancer risk-modifier gene for laboratory analysis and biological validation. Notably, the HR for deletions in BRCA1 suggested an elevated breast cancer risk estimate (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.21), 95% confidence interval (95% CI = 1.09-1.35) compared with non-CNV pathogenic variants. In contrast, deletions overlapping SULT1A1 suggested a decreased breast cancer risk (HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.91) in BRCA1 pathogenic variant carriers. Functional analyses of SULT1A1 showed that reduced mRNA expression in pathogenic BRCA1 variant cells was associated with reduced cellular proliferation and reduced DNA damage after treatment with DNA damaging agents. These data provide evidence that deleterious variants in BRCA1 plus SULT1A1 deletions contribute to variable breast cancer risk in BRCA1 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Hakkaart
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - John F Pearson
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Louise Marquart
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - George A R Wiggins
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Daniel R Barnes
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Bridget A Robinson
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Peter D Mace
- Department of Biochemistry, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Kristiina Aittomäki
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Irene L Andrulis
- Fred A. Litwin Center for Cancer Genetics, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Judith Balmaña
- Hereditary cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa B Barkardottir
- Department of Pathology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- BMC (Biomedical Centre), Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Sami Belhadj
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lieke Berger
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J Blok
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne E Boonen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Julika Borde
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Joan Brunet
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Maria A Caligo
- SOD Genetica Molecolare, University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ian Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Jackie Cook
- Sheffield Clinical Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| | - Casey Cosgrove
- Gynecologic Oncology, Translational Therapeutics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Fergus J Couch
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mary B Daly
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sita Dandiker
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rosemarie Davidson
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Miguel de la Hoya
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Robin de Putter
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - Capucine Delnatte
- Oncogénétique, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest siteRené Gauducheau, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Mallika Dhawan
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Orland Diez
- Hereditary cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
- Area of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yuan Chun Ding
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Susan M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alan Donaldson
- Clinical Genetics Department, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, UK
| | - Jacqueline Eason
- Nottingham Clinical Genetics Service, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Douglas F Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Hans Ehrencrona
- Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Laboratory Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- LIFE - Leipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- North West Genomics Laboratory Hub, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Ulrike Faust
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Lidia Feliubadaló
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Florentia Fostira
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Eitan Friedman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Israel
| | - Megan Frone
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Debra Frost
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Risk and Prevention Clinic, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Gehrig
- Department of Human Genetics, University Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Paul Gesta
- Service Régional Oncogénétique Poitou-Charentes, CH Niort, Niort, France
| | - Andrew K Godwin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - David E Goldgar
- Department of Dermatology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Mark H Greene
- Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Ute Hamann
- Molecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas V O Hansen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Natalie Herold
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ellen Honisch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter J Hulick
- Center for Medical Genetics, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Claudine Isaacs
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Louise Izatt
- Clinical Genetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Angel Izquierdo
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Jakubowska
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
- Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Genetic Diagnostics, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Paul A James
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ramunas Janavicius
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Dept. Of Human and Medical Genetics, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
- State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Esther M John
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Vijai Joseph
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Zoe Kemp
- Breast and Cancer Genetics Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Weatmead Hospital, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Irene Konstantopoulou
- Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, INRASTES, National Centre for Scientific Research 'Demokritos', Athens, Greece
| | - Marco Koudijs
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ava Kwong
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Genetics Center, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yael Laitman
- The Susanne Levy Gertner Oncogenetics Unit, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christine Lasset
- Unité de Prévention et d'Epidémiologie Génétique, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Charlotte Lautrup
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Conxi Lazaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ONCOBELL-IDIBELL-IGTP, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fabienne Lesueur
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Inserm U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Phuong L Mai
- Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Véronique Mari
- Département d'Hématologie-Oncologie Médicale, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - John W M Martens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lesley McGuffog
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Noura Mebirouk
- Genetic Epidemiology of Cancer team, Inserm U900, Paris, France
- Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Mines ParisTech, Fontainebleau, France
| | - Alfons Meindl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Munich, Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| | - Austin Miller
- NRG Oncology, Statistics and Data Management Center, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Marco Montagna
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Lidia Moserle
- Immunology and Molecular Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV - IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Hannah Musgrave
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie Nambot
- Unité d'oncogénétique, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Katherine L Nathanson
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Susan L Neuhausen
- Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joanne Ngeow Yuen Yie
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
- Cancer Genetics Service, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Tu Nguyen-Dumont
- Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Research Lab, Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edith Olah
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Ana Osorio
- Familial Cancer Clinical Unit, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO) and Spanish Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Claus-Eric Ott
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sue K Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Michael T Parsons
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Inge Sokilde Pedersen
- Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ana Peixoto
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Perez-Segura
- Molecular Oncology Laboratory, CIBERONC, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, IdISSC (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos), Madrid, Spain
| | - Paolo Peterlongo
- Genome Diagnostics Program, IFOM ETS - the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Timea Pocza
- Department of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Paolo Radice
- Unit of Molecular Bases of Genetic Risk and Genetic Testing, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy
| | - Juliane Ramser
- Division of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Gustavo C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Karina Rønlund
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Efraim H Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maria Rossing
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rita K Schmutzler
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne (CMMC), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Payal D Shah
- Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Saba Sharif
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital Healthcare NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Priyanka Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, USA
| | | | - Jacques Simard
- Genomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Christian F Singer
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katie Snape
- Medical Genetics Unit, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Doris Steinemann
- Institute of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet
- Service de Génétique, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Department of Tumour Biology, INSERM U830, Paris, France
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christian Sutter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yen Yen Tan
- Dept of OB/GYN and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Porto, Portugal
- Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Soo Hwang Teo
- Breast Cancer Research Programme, Cancer Research Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mads Thomassen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, Odence C, Denmark
| | - Darcy L Thull
- Department of Medicine, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Human Genetics and Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alison H Trainer
- Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of medicine, University Of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vishakha Tripathi
- South East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nadine Tung
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Klaartje van Engelen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ana Vega
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, SERGAS, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Alessandra Viel
- Division of Functional onco-genomics and genetics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Lisa Walker
- Oxford Regional Genetics Service, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey N Weitzel
- Latin American School of Oncology, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico
| | | | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Amanda B Spurdle
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Logan C Walker
- Department of Pathology and Biomedical Science, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kurogi K, Rasool MI, Alherz FA, El Daibani AA, Bairam AF, Abunnaja MS, Yasuda S, Wilson LJ, Hui Y, Liu MC. SULT genetic polymorphisms: physiological, pharmacological and clinical implications. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2021; 17:767-784. [PMID: 34107842 DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1940952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs)-mediated sulfation is critically involved in the metabolism of key endogenous compounds, such as catecholamines and thyroid/steroid hormones, as well as a variety of drugs and other xenobiotics. Studies performed in the past three decades have yielded a good understanding about the enzymology of the SULTs and their structural biology, phylogenetic relationships, tissue/organ-specific/developmental expression, as well as the regulation of the SULT gene expression. An emerging area is related to the functional impact of the SULT genetic polymorphisms. AREAS COVERED The current review aims to summarize our current knowledge about the above-mentioned aspects of the SULT research. An emphasis is on the information concerning the effects of the polymorphisms of the SULT genes on the functional activity of the SULT allozymes and the associated physiological, pharmacological, and clinical implications. EXPERT OPINION Elucidation of how SULT SNPs may influence the drug-sulfating activity of SULT allozymes will help understand the differential drug metabolism and eventually aid in formulating personalized drug regimens. Moreover, the information concerning the differential sulfating activities of SULT allozymes toward endogenous compounds may allow for the development of strategies for mitigating anomalies in the metabolism of these endogenous compounds in individuals with certain SULT genotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuhisa Kurogi
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Biochemistry and Applied Biosciences, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, 889-2192, Japan
| | - Mohammed I Rasool
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Karbala, Karbala, Iraq
| | - Fatemah A Alherz
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amal A El Daibani
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
| | - Ahsan F Bairam
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq
| | - Maryam S Abunnaja
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
| | - Shin Yasuda
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Bioscience, School of Agriculture, Tokai University, Kumamoto City, Kumamoto 862-8652, Japan
| | - Lauren J Wilson
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
| | - Ying Hui
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Cheh Liu
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toledo Health Science Campus, Toledo, OH 43614 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Zhao R, Ye Z, Frey AJ, Schriver ER, Snyder NW, Hebbring SJ. Relationship of SULT1A1 copy number variation with estrogen metabolism and human health. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 174:169-175. [PMID: 28867356 PMCID: PMC5675753 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Human cytosolic sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) is considered to be one of the most important SULT isoforms for metabolism, detoxification, and carcinogenesis. This theory is driven by observations that SULT1A1 is widely expressed in multiple tissues and acts on a wide range of phenolic substrates. SULT1A1 is subject to functional common copy number variation (CNV) including deletions or duplications. However, it is less clear how SULT1A1 CNV impacts health and disease. To better understand the biological role of SULT1A1 in human health, we genotyped CNV in 14,275 Marshfield Clinic patients linked to an extensive electronic health record. Since SULT1A1 is linked to steroid metabolism, select serum steroid hormones were measured in 100 individuals with a wide spectrum of SULT1A1 CNV genotypes. Furthermore, comprehensive phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) were conducted using diagnostic codes and clinical text data. For the first time, individuals homozygous null for SULT1A1 were identified in a human population. Thirty-six percent of the population carried >2 copies of SULT1A1 whereas 4% had ≤1 copy. Results indicate SULT1A1 CNV was negatively correlated with estrone-sulfate to estrone ratio predominantly in males (E1S/E1; p=0.03, r=-0.21) and may be associated with increased risk for common allergies. The effect of SULT1A1 CNV on circulating estrogen metabolites was opposite to the predicted CNV-metabolite trend based on enzymatic function. This finding, and the potential association with common allergies reported herein, warrants future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jixia Liu
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Ran Zhao
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Zhan Ye
- Biomedical Informatics Research Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA
| | - Alexander J Frey
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily R Schriver
- A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Division of Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Scott J Hebbring
- Center for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Swann J, Murry J, Young JAT. Cytosolic sulfotransferase 1A1 regulates HIV-1 minus-strand DNA elongation in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages. Virol J 2016; 13:30. [PMID: 26906565 PMCID: PMC4765207 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-016-0491-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2015] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The cellular sulfonation pathway modulates key steps of virus replication. This pathway comprises two main families of sulfonate-conjugating enzymes: Golgi sulfotransferases, which sulfonate proteins, glycoproteins, glycolipids and proteoglycans; and cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs), which sulfonate various small molecules including hormones, neurotransmitters, and xenobiotics. Sulfonation controls the functions of numerous cellular factors such as those involved in cell-cell interactions, cell signaling, and small molecule detoxification. We previously showed that the cellular sulfonation pathway regulates HIV-1 gene expression and reactivation from latency. Here we show that a specific cellular sulfotransferase can regulate HIV-1 replication in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) by yet another mechanism, namely reverse transcription. Methods MDMs were derived from monocytes isolated from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from the San Diego Blood Bank. After one week in vitro cell culture under macrophage-polarizing conditions, MDMs were transfected with sulfotranserase-specific or control siRNAs and infected with HIV-1 or SIV constructs expressing a luciferase reporter. Infection levels were subsequently monitored by luminescence. Western blotting was used to assay siRNA knockdown and viral protein levels, and qPCR was used to measure viral RNA and DNA products. Results We demonstrate that the cytosolic sulfotransferase SULT1A1 is highly expressed in primary human MDMs, and through siRNA knockdown experiments, we show that this enzyme promotes infection of MDMs by single cycle VSV-G pseudotyped human HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus vectors and by replication-competent HIV-1. Quantitative PCR analysis revealed that SULT1A1 affects HIV-1 replication in MDMs by modulating the kinetics of minus-strand DNA elongation during reverse transcription. Conclusions These studies have identified SULT1A1 as a cellular regulator of HIV-1 reverse transcription in primary human MDMs. The normal substrates of this enzyme are small phenolic-like molecules, raising the possibility that one or more of these substrates may be involved. Targeting SULT1A1 and/or its substrate(s) may offer a novel host-directed strategy to improve HIV-1 therapeutics. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12985-016-0491-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Swann
- The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. .,University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
| | - Jeff Murry
- The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. .,Gilead Sciences, 333 Lakeside Drive, Foster City, CA, 94401, USA.
| | - John A T Young
- The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA. .,Roche Innovation Center Basel, F.Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ottini L, Rizzolo P, Zanna I, Silvestri V, Saieva C, Falchetti M, Masala G, Navazio AS, Capalbo C, Bianchi S, Manoukian S, Barile M, Peterlongo P, Caligo MA, Varesco L, Tommasi S, Russo A, Giannini G, Cortesi L, Cini G, Montagna M, Radice P, Palli D. Association of SULT1A1 Arg²¹³His polymorphism with male breast cancer risk: results from a multicenter study in Italy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2014; 148:623-8. [PMID: 25385181 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-3193-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/31/2014] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare and poorly understood. Like female breast cancer (FBC), MBCs are highly sensitive to hormonal changes, and hyperestrogenism, specifically, represents a major risk factor for MBC. MBC is considered similar to late-onset, post-menopausal estrogen/progesteron receptors positive FBC (ER+/PR+). Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) is an enzyme involved in the metabolism of estrogens. Recently, SULT1A1 common functional polymorphism Arg(213)His (638G>A) variant has been found to be associated with increased breast cancer (BC) risk, particularly in post-menopausal women. For this reason, we decided to explore whether SULT1A1 Arg(213)His could exert an effect on MBC development. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the SULT1A1 Arg(213)His polymorphism on MBC risk. The secondary aim was to investigate possible associations with relevant clinical-pathologic features of MBC. A total of 394 MBC cases and 786 healthy male controls were genotyped for SULT1A1 Arg(213)His polymorphism by PCR-RFLP and high-resolution melting analysis. All MBC cases were characterized for relevant clinical-pathologic features. A significant difference in the distribution of SULT1A1 Arg(213)His genotypes was found between MBC cases and controls (P < 0.0001). The analysis of genotype-specific risk showed a significant increased MBC risk in individuals with G/A (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.50-2.59; P < 0.0001) and A/A (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.83-5.23; P < 0.0001) genotypes in comparison to wild-type genotype, under co-dominant model. A significant association between SULT1A1 risk genotypes and HER2 status emerged. Results indicate that SULT1A1 Arg(213)His may act as a low-penetrance risk allele for developing MBC and could be associated with a specific tumor subtype associated with HER2 overexpression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ottini
- Department of Molecular Medicine, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xiao J, Zheng Y, Zhou Y, Zhang P, Wang J, Shen F, Fan L, Kolluri VK, Wang W, Yan X, Wang M. Sulfotransferase SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism with cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 53 case-control studies. PLoS One 2014; 9:e106774. [PMID: 25225888 PMCID: PMC4165769 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The SULT1A1 Arg213His (rs9282861) polymorphism is reported to be associated with many kinds of cancer risk. However, the findings are conflicting. For better understanding this SNP site and cancer risk, we summarized available data and performed this meta-analysis. Methods Data were collected from the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Knowledge and CNKI. The association was assessed by odd ratio (OR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results A total of 53 studies including 16733 cancer patients and 23334 controls based on the search criteria were analyzed. Overall, we found SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism can increase cancer risk under heterozygous (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.01–1.18, P = 0.040), dominant (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01–1.19, P = 0.021) and allelic (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.02–1.16, P = 0.015) models. In subgroup analyses, significant associations were observed in upper aero digestive tract (UADT) cancer (heterozygous model: OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.11–2.35, P = 0.012; dominant model: OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.13–2.35, P = 0.009; allelic model: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.10–2.11, P = 0.012) and Indians (recessive model: OR = 1.93, 95% CI = 1.22–3.07, P = 0.005) subgroups. Hospital based study also showed marginally significant association. In the breast cancer subgroup, ethnicity and publication year revealed by meta-regression analysis and one study found by sensitivity analysis were the main sources of heterogeneity. The association between SULT1A1 Arg213His and breast cancer risk was not significant. No publication bias was detected. Conclusions The present meta-analysis suggests that SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism plays an important role in carcinogenesis, which may be a genetic factor affecting individual susceptibility to UADT cancer. SULT1A1 Arg213His didn't show any association with breast cancer, but the possible risk in Asian population needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juanjuan Xiao
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yabiao Zheng
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yinghui Zhou
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jianguo Wang
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Fangyuan Shen
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lixia Fan
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Vijay Kumar Kolluri
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiaolong Yan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tangdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
- * E-mail: (XLY); (MHW)
| | - Minghua Wang
- Department of Biochemical and Molecular Biology, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
- * E-mail: (XLY); (MHW)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Su CM, Chen MC, Lin IC, Chen HA, Huang MT, Wu CH, Shen KH, Wang YH. Association between the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and the risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 2014; 35:7147-53. [PMID: 24763827 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-1954-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/07/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Several previous studies have investigated the association between the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and the risk of bladder cancer in various populations. However, these results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and the risk of bladder cancer. An extensive literature search was performed to identify all eligible studies regarding this association. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the strength of risk under fixed and random effects models. We identified and included eight case-control studies including 2,036 cases and 2,273 controls. No significant association was found between the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and the risk of bladder cancer under the dominant model; however, those with the SULT1A1 Arg/Arg genotype had a significantly increased risk (OR = 1.218, 95 % CI = 1.067-1.392, P = 0.0044) under the recessive model. In the subgroup analysis of ethnicity, a significant association was observed in Caucasians under the recessive model (OR = 1.269, 95 % CI = 1.069-1.506, P = 0.007). Furthermore, an increased risk of bladder cancer was observed between the Arg213His polymorphism and never smokers in the recessive model (OR = 1.428, 95 % CI = 1.079-1.890, P = 0.013). The results of this meta-analysis indicate that the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism is associated with the risk bladder cancer under a recessive model; however, a possibly higher risk for Caucasians with the Arg/Arg genotype and never smokers needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Ming Su
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu X, Kubota T, Dhakal I, Hasegawa S, Williams S, Ozawa S, Kadlubar S. Copy number variation in sulfotransferase isoform 1A1 (SULT1A1) is significantly associated with enzymatic activity in Japanese subjects. PHARMACOGENOMICS & PERSONALIZED MEDICINE 2013; 6:19-24. [PMID: 23526707 PMCID: PMC3596141 DOI: 10.2147/pgpm.s36579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Sulfotransferase isoform 1A1 (SULT1A1) plays a key role in the metabolism of a variety of endo- and xenobiotics and it’s activity could influence response to drugs. Our previous studies have focused on the impact of genetic variants of SULT1A1 on enzymatic activity in Caucasians and African-Americans. However, the contribution of genetic variants to SULT1A1 activity in Asians has not been explored. In this study, we investigated the collective effects of both SULT1A1 copy number variants (CNVs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the promoter region, coding region, and 3′ untranslated region on SULT1A1 activity in Japanese subjects. SNPs in the SULT1A1 promoter and 3′ untranslated region were not associated with SULT1A1 activity (P > 0.05). SULT1A1*1/2 (Arg213His) was marginally associated with SULT1A1 activity (P = 0.037). However, SULT1A1 CNVs were strongly associated with SULT1A1 activity (trend test P = 0.008) and accounted for 10% of the observed variability in activity for Japanese subjects. In conclusion, SULT1A1 CNVs play a pivotal role in determination of SULT1A1 activity in Japanese subjects, highlighting the influence of ethnic differences in SULT1A1 genetic variants on drug metabolism and therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinfeng Yu
- Division of Medical Genetics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Xu X, Hou Y, Yin X, Bao L, Tang A, Song L, Li F, Tsang S, Wu K, Wu H, He W, Zeng L, Xing M, Wu R, Jiang H, Liu X, Cao D, Guo G, Hu X, Gui Y, Li Z, Xie W, Sun X, Shi M, Cai Z, Wang B, Zhong M, Li J, Lu Z, Gu N, Zhang X, Goodman L, Bolund L, Wang J, Yang H, Kristiansen K, Dean M, Li Y, Wang J. Single-cell exome sequencing reveals single-nucleotide mutation characteristics of a kidney tumor. Cell 2012; 148:886-95. [PMID: 22385958 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 487] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2011] [Revised: 12/15/2011] [Accepted: 02/15/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common kidney cancer and has very few mutations that are shared between different patients. To better understand the intratumoral genetics underlying mutations of ccRCC, we carried out single-cell exome sequencing on a ccRCC tumor and its adjacent kidney tissue. Our data indicate that this tumor was unlikely to have resulted from mutations in VHL and PBRM1. Quantitative population genetic analysis indicates that the tumor did not contain any significant clonal subpopulations and also showed that mutations that had different allele frequencies within the population also had different mutation spectrums. Analyses of these data allowed us to delineate a detailed intratumoral genetic landscape at a single-cell level. Our pilot study demonstrates that ccRCC may be more genetically complex than previously thought and provides information that can lead to new ways to investigate individual tumors, with the aim of developing more effective cellular targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xun Xu
- BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lee H, Wang Q, Yang F, Tao P, Li H, Huang Y, Li JY. SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism, smoked meat, and breast cancer risk: a case-control study and meta-analysis. DNA Cell Biol 2011; 31:688-99. [PMID: 22011087 DOI: 10.1089/dna.2011.1403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
SULT1A1 is involved in both detoxification of estrogens and bioactivation of carcinogens in smoked meat. SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism's effect on breast cancer risk is still unclear. We recruited 400 case-control pairs to investigate the association between SULT1A1 genotypes and breast cancer risk, and the combined effect of SULT1A1 polymorphism and daily intake of smoked meat. Participants were questioned about their dietary habits and other risk factors, and their SULT1A1 genotypes were determined. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by multivariable unconditional logistic regression. We also performed a meta-analysis of relevant published studies to test these associations. In the case-control study, no significant associations were observed between SULT1A1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. In the meta-analysis, SULT1A1 His/His genotype slightly increased risk among both overall and postmenopausal women (OR(pooled-overall)=1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24; OR(pooled-post)=1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32). A larger positive association was observed in Asian populations (OR(pooled-Asian)=2.01, 95% CI: 1.24-3.26). In our case-control study, high energy-adjusted daily intake of smoked meat was significantly associated with breast cancer risk in overall, pre- and postmenopausal women (aORs: 2.31-3.13, OR 95% CIs exclude 1). High smoked meat intake interacted positively with the His variant allele (all γ>1). These results correlated with those of the meta-analysis (γ(pooled-overall)=1.27). The SULT1A1 His/His genotype may increase the risk of breast cancer among Asian women, and dietary exposure to heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, along with the SULT1A1 His/His variant genotype, may synergistically increase the risk of breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Lee
- Department of Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, PR China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li K, Ren YW, Wan Y, Yin ZH, Wu W, Zhou BS. SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and susceptibility of environment-related cancers: a meta analysis of 5,915 cases and 7,900 controls. Mol Biol Rep 2011; 39:2597-605. [PMID: 21670965 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1012-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 06/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The common genetic polymorphism for SULT1A1 is Arg213His polymorphism, which may affect the sulfation process of various environmental carcinogens and thus is suggested to be related to susceptibility of several cancers. However, studies on the association between SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconsistent. To assess the relationship between Arg213His polymorphism and environmental-related cancers systematically, we performed a meta analysis from 20 case-control studies including 5,915 cases and 7,900 controls. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the strength of risk, we found a significant association between SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism and environment-related cancers (for dominant model: OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.39, P = 0.003). When stratified by ethnicity, a significant risk was observed in Asian cases, compared with controls (for dominant model: OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.17-2.43, P = 0.005). When we chose only smokers in our analysis, we also found a significantly increased risk between Arg213His polymorphism and susceptibility of environment-related cancers for participants exposed to a smoking environment. In conclusion, SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism, ethnicity, smoking may modulate environment-related cancer risk. Studies on gene-gene interactions in the sequential or concurrent metabolic pathway and gene-environment interactions need to be further conducted to explore the susceptibility of cancer occurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kun Li
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, China Medical University, No 92 Beier Road, Heping District, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning Province, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Smiderle L, Galvão ACS, Fontana C, Wender MCO, Agnes G, Giovenardi M, Hutz MH, Almeida S. Evaluation of UGT1A1 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms with lipid levels in women with different hormonal status. Gynecol Endocrinol 2011; 27:20-6. [PMID: 20528568 DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2010.493248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estrogens influence many physiological processes including cardiovascular health. Polymorphisms in phase I and II estrogen metabolism enzymes are associated with lipid levels in women. METHODS A cross-sectional study was carried out with 269 postmenopausal women, 116 who received oral hormonal therapy (HT) (39-75 years) with estrogens or estrogens plus progestagen, 153 that did not receive any HT (38-85 years), and 155 premenopausal women (18-52 years). Polymorphisms in UGT1A1 (rs5839491) and SULT1A1 (rs1042028) were analysed by PCR-based methods. Adjusted lipid levels means were compared among genotypes by one-way analysis of variance, with corrections for multiple testing. RESULTS The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism was associated with total cholesterol (T-chol) (p = 0.030; corrected p = 0.060) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (p = 0.011, corrected p = 0.022) in premenopausal women. The premenopausal and postmenopausal women, both carriers of SULT1A1*2/*2, had lower levels of T-chol and LDL-C means than carriers of the SULT1A1*1/*1 (p = 0.004, corrected p = 0.008 and 0.009, corrected p = 0.018, respectively). CONCLUSION The data showed the presence of an association between the UGT1A1*28/*28 and SULT1A1*2/*2 and T-chol and LDL-C levels in women with different hormonal status. No previous studies investigated the association of the polymorphisms examined in this study with lipoprotein levels in women separately by hormonal status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisiane Smiderle
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre-UFCSPA, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jiang Y, Zhou L, Yan T, Shen Z, Shao Z, Lu J. Association of sulfotransferase SULT1A1 with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of case-control studies with subgroups of ethnic and menopausal statue. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH : CR 2010; 29:101. [PMID: 20663177 PMCID: PMC2914670 DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Accepted: 07/21/2010] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sulfotransferase (SULT) plays an important role in the formation of estrogen which is usually conferred as a risk factor for breast cancer. Polymorphism of the SULT1A1 may be closely associated with breast cancer. However, studies on the association between polymorphism and breast cancer have yielded inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis including ethnic subgroup and menopausal statue subgroup to investigate the association of SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism with breast cancer. METHODS PubMed, EBSCO and Web of Science databases were searched for the correlative articles up to January 2010 (10362 breast cancer patients and 14250 controls). The risk (odds ratio, OR) was used to estimate the association between SULT1A1 polymorphism and breast cancer risk. All of the data from each study use either fixed-effects or random-effects. RESULTS We found that SULT1A1 Arg213His had no exact effect to increase the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.17, P = 0.164), but it did increase the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women in the dominant model (OR = 1.28, 95%CI: 1.04-1.58, P = 0.019). No similar effect was found among premenopausal breast cancer women (OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.88-1.27, P = 0.537). There was a significant increase in breast cancer risk among Asian women (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.00-4.14, P = 0.051) but not Caucasian women in recessive model. There was publication bias among postmenopausal women subgroup (P = 0.002), however by using the trim and fill method, if the publication bias was the only source of the funnel plot asymmetry, it needed two more studies to be symmetrical. The value of Log OR did not change too much after the adjustment and the fail-safe number of missing studies that would bring the P-value changed was 17. CONCLUSIONS We concluded that the polymorphism of SULT1A1 Arg213His might be one of the high risk factors for breast cancer in Asian women and in postmenopausal women for all races. We should point out that the publication bias among postmenopausal women may partly account for the result, but the conclusion might not affected deeply by the publication bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiwei Jiang
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Hospital/Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
The association of SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: meta-analysis from 16 studies involving 23,445 subjects. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 125:215-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0953-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2010] [Accepted: 05/12/2010] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
15
|
Marjani H, Biramijamal F, Rakhshani N, Hossein-Nezhad A, Malekzadeh R. Investigation of NQO1 genetic polymorphism, NQO1 gene expression and PAH-DNA adducts in ESCC. A case-control study from Iran. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH 2010; 9:239-49. [DOI: 10.4238/vol9-1gmr693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
16
|
SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 8,454 cases and 11,800 controls. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 122:193-8. [PMID: 19949855 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0648-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2009] [Accepted: 11/11/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism is suggested to be implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer. However, the published findings are inconsistent. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of 8,454 breast cancer cases and 11,800 controls from 14 published case-control studies. We used odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the strength of the association of the R213H polymorphism with breast cancer risk. Overall, our results suggested that there is no significant relationship between SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer. However, further ethnic population analysis revealed a significantly increased risk of breast cancer for HH allele carriers among Asians (for HH vs. RR: OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.11-4.63, P (heterogeneity) = 0.63; for the recessive model: OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.00-4.41, P (heterogeneity) = 0.62). Taken together, this meta-analysis suggests that the SULT1A1 R213H may be a low-penetrant risk factor for developing breast cancer in Asian population.
Collapse
|
17
|
Syamala VS, Syamala V, Sheeja VR, Kuttan R, Balakrishnan R, Ankathil R. Possible Risk Modification by Polymorphisms of Estrogen Metabolizing Genes in Familial Breast Cancer Susceptibility in an Indian Population. Cancer Invest 2009; 28:304-11. [DOI: 10.3109/07357900902744494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
18
|
Wang YH, Juang GD, Hwang TI, Shen CH, Shao KY, Chiou HY. Genetic polymorphism of sulfotransferase 1A1, cigarette smoking, hazardous chemical exposure and urothelial cancer risk in a Taiwanese population. Int J Urol 2009; 15:1029-34. [PMID: 19120511 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02166.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the association between genetic polymorphism of sulfotransferase1A1 (SULT1A1), cigarette smoking, hazardous chemical exposure and urothelial cancer risk in a Taiwanese population. METHODS In a hospital-based case-control study, a total of 300 urothelial cancer (UC) cases and 300 cancer-free controls frequency-matched by age and gender were recruited from September 1998 to December 2005. The SULT1A1 arginine213histidine (Arg213His) polymorphism was genotyped using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. RESULTS We found that the significantly increased UC risks of ever smokers and heavy smokers (> or =28 pack-years) were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4-3.3) and 2.2 (95% CI = 1.3-3.6), respectively. An increased UC risk of 1.8 (95% CI = 0.8-3.8) was observed among individuals with more than one item of hazardous chemical exposure, but it was not statistically significant. Compared with study subjects carrying the SULT1A1 Arg/Arg genotype, those with SULT1A1 Arg/His or His/His genotypes have a significantly decreased UC risk (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3-0.8). Heavy smokers carrying the SULT1A1 Arg/Arg genotype have a significantly increased UC risk (OR = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.3-11.6). Individuals who had been exposed to more than one item of hazardous chemicals and who carried the SULT1A1 Arg/Arg genotype have a significantly increased UC risk (OR = 3.7, 95% CI = 1.4-9.7). The highest significant increased UC risk (OR = 16.1, 95% CI = 2.9-87.2) was observed among ever smokers with hazardous chemical exposure and the SULT1A1 Arg/Arg genotype. CONCLUSIONS SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism is associated with the development of UC, especially among cigarette smokers exposed to hazardous chemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Hung Wang
- School of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Case-control study and meta-analysis of SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism for gene, ethnicity and environment interaction for cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2008; 99:1340-7. [PMID: 18854828 PMCID: PMC2570530 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cytosolic sulphotransferase SULT1A1 plays a dual role in the activation of some carcinogens and inactivation of others. A functional polymorphism leading to Arg213His substitution (SULT1A1*2) affects its catalytic activity and thermostability. To study the association of SULT1A1*2 polymorphism with tobacco-related cancers (TRCs), a case–control study comprising 132 patients with multiple primary neoplasm (MPN) involving TRC and 198 cancer-free controls was carried out. One hundred and thirteen MPN patients had at least one cancer in upper aerodigestive tract including lung (UADT-MPN). SULT1A1*2 showed significant risk association with UADT-MPN (odds ratio (OR)=5.50, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09, 27.7). Meta-analysis was conducted combining the data with 34 published studies that included 11 962 cancer cases and 14 673 controls in diverse cancers. The SULT1A1*2 revealed contrasting risk association for UADT cancers (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.34) and genitourinary cancers (OR=0.73, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.92). Furthermore, although SULT1A1*2 conferred significant increased risk of breast cancer to Asian women (OR=1.91, 95% CI: 1.08, 3.40), it did not confer increased risk to Caucasian women (OR=0.92, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.18). Thus risk for different cancers in distinct ethnic groups could be modulated by interaction between genetic variants and different endogenous and exogenous carcinogens.
Collapse
|
20
|
Rohrmann S, Lukas Jung SU, Linseisen J, Pfau W. Dietary intake of meat and meat-derived heterocyclic aromatic amines and their correlation with DNA adducts in female breast tissue. Mutagenesis 2008; 24:127-32. [PMID: 18980957 DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gen058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
It was the aim of this study to examine the association of the consumption of meat in general, meat prepared by different cooking methods and the dietary intake of heterocyclic aromatic amines (HCA) with the level of DNA adducts in the breast tissue of women undergoing reduction mammoplasty. Dietary intake of meat and HCA were assessed via questionnaire in 44 women undergoing reduction mammoplasty. DNA adduct analysis in breast tissue was performed by (32)P-postlabelling analysis. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to examine the association of meat consumption and dietary HCA intake with tissue DNA adduct levels. A median DNA adduct level of 18.45 (interquartile range 12.81-25.65) per 10(9) nucleotides in breast tissue was observed; median HCA intake was 40.43 ng/day (interquartile range 19.55-102.33 ng/day). Total HCA intake (r = 0.33, P = 0.03), consumption of fried meat (r = 0.39, P = 0.01), beef (r = 0.32, P = 0.03) and processed meat (r = 0.51, P = 0.0004) were statistically significantly correlated with the level of DNA adducts in breast tissue. The detected DNA adducts could not be confirmed to be specific HCA-derived DNA adducts by comparison with external standards, using the (32)P-postlabelling assay. We observed strong correlations of dietary HCA intake and consumption of fried and processed meat with DNA adduct levels in breast tissue of 44 women. Since the detected DNA adducts were not necessarily specific only for HCA, it is possible that HCA intake is a surrogate of other genotoxic substances, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, in meat prepared at high temperatures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Rohrmann
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Taioli E. Gene-environment interaction in tobacco-related cancers. Carcinogenesis 2008; 29:1467-74. [PMID: 18550573 PMCID: PMC2733188 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgn062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2007] [Revised: 02/27/2008] [Accepted: 02/27/2008] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
This review summarizes the carcinogenic effects of tobacco smoke and the basis for interaction between tobacco smoke and genetic factors. Examples of published papers on gene-tobacco interaction and cancer risk are presented. The assessment of gene-environment interaction in tobacco-related cancers has been more complex than originally expected for several reasons, including the multiplicity of genes involved in tobacco metabolism, the numerous substrates metabolized by the relevant genes and the interaction of smoking with other metabolic pathways. Future studies on gene-environment interaction and cancer risk should include biomarkers of smoking dose, along with markers of quantitative historical exposure to tobacco. Epigenetic studies should be added to classic genetic analyses, in order to better understand gene-environmental interaction and individual susceptibility. Other metabolic pathways in competition with tobacco genetic metabolism/repair should be incorporated in epidemiological studies to generate a more complete picture of individual cancer risk associated with environmental exposure to carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emanuela Taioli
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, 5150 Center Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gjerde J, Hauglid M, Breilid H, Lundgren S, Varhaug JE, Kisanga ER, Mellgren G, Steen VM, Lien EA. Effects of CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes including SULT1A1 gene copy number on tamoxifen metabolism. Ann Oncol 2007; 19:56-61. [PMID: 17947222 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tamoxifen is hydroxylated by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 to the potent metabolites 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHtam) and 4-hydroxy-N-demethyltamoxifen (4OHNDtam), which are both conjugated by sulphotransferase (SULT)1A1. Clinical studies indicate that CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes are predictors for treatment response to tamoxifen. Therefore, we examined the relationship between CYP2D6 genotype, SULT1A1 genotype, SULT1A1 copy number and the pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen. PATIENTS AND METHODS The serum levels of tamoxifen and metabolites of 151 breast cancer patients were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms and SULT1A1 copy number were determined by long PCR, PCR-based restriction fragment length polymorphism, DNA sequencing and fluorescence-based PCR. RESULTS The levels of 4OHtam, 4OHNDtam and N-demethyltamoxifen were associated with CYP2D6 predicted enzymatic activity (P < 0.05). The SULT1A1 genotype or copy number did not influence the levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites. However, the ratios of N-demethyltamoxifen/tamoxifen and N-dedimethyltamoxifen/N-demethyltamoxifen were related to SULT1A1 genotype. CONCLUSION CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes may partly explain the wide inter-individual variations in the serum levels of tamoxifen and its metabolites. We propose that therapeutic drug monitoring should be included in studies linking CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotypes to clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Gjerde
- The Hormone Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brody JG, Moysich KB, Humblet O, Attfield KR, Beehler GP, Rudel RA. Environmental pollutants and breast cancer: epidemiologic studies. Cancer 2007; 109:2667-711. [PMID: 17503436 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 248] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Laboratory research has shown that numerous environmental pollutants cause mammary gland tumors in animals; are hormonally active, specifically mimicking estrogen, which is a breast cancer risk factor; or affect susceptibility of the mammary gland to carcinogenesis. An assessment of epidemiologic research on these pollutants identified in toxicologic studies can guide future research and exposure reduction aimed at prevention. The PubMed database was searched for relevant literature and systematic critical reviews were entered in a database available at URL: www.silentspring.org/sciencereview and URL: www.komen.org/environment (accessed April 10, 2007). Based on a relatively small number of studies, the evidence to date generally supports an association between breast cancer and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in conjunction with certain genetic polymorphisms involved in carcinogen activation and steroid hormone metabolism. Evidence regarding dioxins and organic solvents is sparse and methodologically limited but suggestive of an association. Methodologic problems include inadequate exposure assessment, a lack of access to highly exposed and unexposed populations, and a lack of preclinical markers to identify associations that may be obscured by disease latency. Among chemicals identified in toxicologic research as relevant to breast cancer, many have not been investigated in humans. The development of better exposure assessment methods is needed to fill this gap. In the interim, weaknesses in the epidemiologic literature argue for greater reliance on toxicologic studies to develop national policies to reduce chemical exposures that may be associated with breast cancer. Substantial research progress in the last 5 years suggests that the investigation of environmental pollutants will lead to strategies to reduce breast cancer risk.
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang YH, Lee YH, Tseng PT, Shen CH, Chiou HY. Human NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) polymorphisms and urothelial cancer risk in Taiwan. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2007; 134:203-9. [PMID: 17619904 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-007-0271-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2007] [Accepted: 06/22/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether the NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) polymorphisms are associated with urothelial cancer (UC) risk in Taiwan. METHODS In this study, 600 study subjects (including 300 UC patients and 300 cancer-free controls) were recruited from September 1998 to December 2005. We analyzed the NQO1 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms by the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. A comprehensive interview was conducted to collect information, including baseline characteristics and cigarette smoking status. We used an unconditional multivariate logistic regression to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS We found a significantly increased UC risk in study subjects with the NQO1 C/T and T/T genotypes (OR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.03-2.1). A significantly increased UC risk was found in those with the SULT1A1 G/G genotype (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.3-3.2). Subjects who had ever smoked with either the NQO1 C/T and T/T genotypes or the SULT1A1 G/G genotype had significantly increased UC risks, showing ORs of 3.0 and 5.3, respectively. Subjects carrying both the NQO1 C/T and T/T genotypes and the SULT1A1 G/G genotype had a significantly increased UC risk (OR = 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4-9.7). Moreover, those who had ever smoked with both the NQO1 C/T and T/T genotypes and the SULT1A1 G/G genotype had the highest UC risk (OR = 8.6; 95% CI: 2.5-29.7). CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that NQO1 and SULT1A1 polymorphisms are associated with the risk of UC, particularly among those who have ever smoked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Hung Wang
- School of Public Health, Topnotch Stroke Research Center, Taipei Medical University, 250 Wu-Hsing Street, Taipei 110, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ung D, Nagar S. Variable sulfation of dietary polyphenols by recombinant human sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 genetic variants and SULT1E1. Drug Metab Dispos 2007; 35:740-6. [PMID: 17293380 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.106.013987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Human cytosolic sulfotransferases (SULTs) catalyze the sulfate conjugation of several important endo- and xenobiotics. Among the superfamily of SULT enzymes, SULT1A1 catalyzes the sulfation of small planar phenolic compounds, whereas SULT1E1 has a major role in estrogen conjugation. The human SULT1A1 gene has common single nucleotide polymorphisms that define three allozymes, SULT1A1*1, *2, and *3. The enzyme kinetics of SULT1A1 allozymes and SULT1E1 were characterized for the polyphenolic substrates apigenin, chrysin, epicatechin, quercetin, and resveratrol. Purified recombinant SULT proteins were generated in a baculoviral-insect cell system, and incubated in vitro with each substrate to determine catalytic activity. The effect of polyphenol sulfation was examined in mammalian cell lines stably expressing SULT1E1. For all polyphenols investigated, "normal-activity" SULT1A1*1 allozyme had significantly greater Vmax estimates than SULT1E1, and allele-specific differences in SULT1A1-mediated sulfation were observed. The polymorphic SULT1A1*2 allozyme exhibited low activity toward apigenin, epicatechin, and resveratrol. SULT1A1*1 and *3 acted as normal-activity allozymes for these substrates. Altered cellular proliferation was observed in MCF-7 cells stably expressing SULT1E1 upon treatment with chrysin, quercetin, or resveratrol, thus suggesting inactivation of these compounds by SULT1E1. These results suggest an important role for SULT isozymes and their pharmacogenetics in polyphenol disposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Din Ung
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Temple University School of Pharmacy, 3307 North Broad St., Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kurian JR, Chin NA, Longlais BJ, Hayes KL, Trepanier LA. Reductive detoxification of arylhydroxylamine carcinogens by human NADH cytochrome b5 reductase and cytochrome b5. Chem Res Toxicol 2007; 19:1366-73. [PMID: 17040106 PMCID: PMC2516554 DOI: 10.1021/tx060106t] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Heterocyclic and aromatic amine carcinogens are thought to lead to tumor initiation via the formation of DNA adducts, and bioactivation to arylhydroxylamine metabolites is necessary for reactivity with DNA. Carcinogenic arylhydroxylamine metabolites are cleared by a microsomal, NADH-dependent, oxygen-insensitive reduction pathway in humans, which may be a source of interindividual variability in response to aromatic amine carcinogens. The purpose of this study was to characterize the identity of this reduction pathway in human liver. On the basis of our findings with structurally similar arylhydroxylamine metabolites of therapeutic drugs, we hypothesized that the reductive detoxification of arylhydroxylamine carcinogens was catalyzed by NADH cytochrome b5 reductase (b5R) and cytochrome b5 (cyt b5). We found that reduction of the carcinogenic hydroxylamines of the aromatic amine 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP; found in cigarette smoke) and the heterocyclic amine 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b] pyridine (PhIP; found in grilled meats) was indeed catalyzed by a purified system containing only human b5R and cyt b5. Specific activities were 56-346-fold higher in the purified system as compared to human liver microsomes (HLM), with similar Michaelis-Menten constants (K(m) values) in both systems. The stoichiometry for b5R and cyt b5 that yielded the highest activity in the purified system was also similar to that found in native HLM ( approximately 1:8 to 1:10). Polyclonal antisera to either b5R or cyt b5 significantly inhibited N-hydroxy-4-aminobiphenyl (NHOH-4-ABP) reduction by 95 and 89%, respectively, and immunoreactive cyt b5 protein content in individual HLM was significantly correlated with individual reduction of both NHOH-4-ABP and N-hydroxy-PhIP (NHOH-PhIP). Finally, titration of HLM into the purified b5R/cyt b5 system did not enhance the efficiency of reduction activity. We conclude that b5R and cyt b5 are together solely capable of the reduction of arylhydroxylamine carcinogens, and we further hypothesize that this pathway may be a source of individual variability with respect to cancer susceptibility following 4-ABP or PhIP exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Lauren A. Trepanier
- Address correspondence to: Lauren A. Trepanier, Department of Medical Sciences, UW-Madison School of Veterinary Medicine, 2015 Linden Dr, Madison, WI, 53706. Tel. 608 265−9022; Fax 608 265−8020;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pachouri SS, Sobti RC, Kaur P, Singh J, Gupta SK. Impact of polymorphism in sulfotransferase gene on the risk of lung cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 171:39-43. [PMID: 17074589 DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2006] [Accepted: 06/22/2006] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Sulfotransferases (SULTs) are very important multifunctional enzymes that catalyze sulfonate conjugation, which is an important pathway in the phase II metabolism of numerous endogenous and exogenous compounds. Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) is active toward a wide range of substrates, including environmental and tobacco carcinogens. This case-control study involved collection of peripheral blood samples (2-5 mL) of 103 lung cancer patients and 122 controls from North Indian subjects. The SULT1A1 polymorphism was determined by using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method. The association between polymorphisms in the SULT1A1 gene with the risk of lung cancer was estimated by computing odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. We observed marginally increased risk for mutant genotype (AA) of SULT1A1 for lung cancer (OR = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.48-4.06). A statistically significant association was found for smokers between either of two SULT1A1 genotypes, GA (OR = 10.3, 95% CI = 3.48-31.78, P = 0.000002) or AA (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.99-7.81, P = 0.0002), and lung cancer. The present study indicates that the SULT1A1 genotype may play an important role in the risk of developing lung cancer, especially in cigarette smokers.
Collapse
|
28
|
Nagar S, Walther S, Blanchard RL. Sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 Polymorphic Variants *1, *2, and *3 Are Associated with Altered Enzymatic Activity, Cellular Phenotype, and Protein Degradation. Mol Pharmacol 2006; 69:2084-92. [PMID: 16517757 DOI: 10.1124/mol.105.019240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The superfamily of sulfotransferase (SULT) enzymes catalyzes the sulfate conjugation of several pharmacologically important endo- and xenobiotics. SULT1A1 catalyzes the sulfation of small planar phenols such as neurotransmitters, steroid hormones, acetaminophen, and p-nitrophenol (PNP). Genetic polymorphisms in the human SULT1A1 gene define three alleles, SULT1A1*1, *2, and *3. The enzyme activities of the SULT1A1 allozymes were studied with a variety of substrates, including PNP, 17beta-estradiol, 2-methoxyestradiol, catecholestrogens, the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT), and dietary flavonoids. Using purified recombinant SULT1A1 protein, marked differences in *1, *2, and *3 activity toward every substrate studied were noted. Substrate inhibition was observed for most substrates. In general, the trend in V(max) estimates was *1 > *3 > *2; however, V(max)/K(m) estimate trends varied with substrate. In MCF-7 cells stably expressing either SULT1A1*1 or *2, the antiestrogenic response to OHT was found to be allele-specific: the cells expressing *2 exhibited a better antiproliferative response. The intracellular stability of the *1 and *2 allozymes was examined in insect as well as mammalian cells. The SULT1A1*2 protein had a shorter half-life than the *1 protein. In addition, the *2 protein was ubiquitinated to a greater extent than *1, suggesting increased degradation via a proteasome pathway. The results of this study suggest marked differences in activity of polymorphic SULT1A1 variants, including SULT1A1*3, toward a variety of substrates. These differences are potentially critical for understanding interindividual variability in drug response and toxicity, as well as cancer risk and incidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Swati Nagar
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Shatalova EG, Loginov VI, Braga EA, Kazubskaja TP, Sudomoina MA, Blanchard RL, Favorova OO. Association of SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk and phenotypes in Russian women. Mol Biol 2006. [DOI: 10.1134/s0026893306020075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
30
|
Sillanpää P, Kataja V, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Uusitupa M, Vainio H, Mitrunen K, Hirvonen A. Sulfotransferase 1A1 genotype as a potential modifier of breast cancer risk among premenopausal women. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2005; 15:749-52. [PMID: 16141802 DOI: 10.1097/01.fpc.0000172240.34923.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
SULT1A1 is involved in biotransformation of many endogenous and exogenous substrates, such as drugs, hormones and tobacco smoke carcinogens. A polymorphism in the sulfotransferase 1A1 gene (SULT1A1) results in an amino acid change from Arg to His at codon 213. The His allele (SULT1A1*2) has been shown to encode a protein with much lower catalytic activity than the protein encoded by the Arg allele (SULT1A1*1). We examined whether this polymorphism modified breast cancer risk in a Finnish-Caucasian study population consisting of 483 breast cancer patients and 482 healthy population controls. No significant genotype effects were seen in the overall breast cancer risk. However, a decreased risk of breast cancer was found among premenopausal women with at least three pregnancies and at least one SULT1A1*2 allele (odds ratio = 0.23, 95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.63) compared to women with two SULT1A1*1 alleles. Our results suggest that the SULT1A1 genotype is not an important risk factor for breast cancer in general, but may modify the risk among premenopausaul women with high parity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pia Sillanpää
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yang G, Gao YT, Cai QY, Shu XO, Cheng JR, Zheng W. Modifying Effects of Sulfotransferase 1A1 Gene Polymorphism on the Association of Breast Cancer Risk with Body Mass Index or Endogenous Steroid Hormones. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 94:63-70. [PMID: 16175316 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-005-7280-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Sulfotransferase (SULT) 1A1 is involved in the inactivation and elimination of estrogens and catechol estrogens. A common functional polymorphism (Arg213His) has been linked in our previous study of postmenopausal Caucasian women to an elevated risk of breast cancer and the association appeared to be modified by factors related to high endogenous estrogen exposures. We further evaluated this polymorphism and levels of BMI and steroid hormones in association with breast cancer risk in a population-based case-control study of Chinese women, involving 1102 incident cases aged 25-64 years and 1147 age-matched population controls. The SULT1A1 genotype was not associated with overall breast cancer risk in this population. A possible association was suggested for postmenopausal breast cancer (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 0.9-2.1 for subject carrying the variant His allele). The SULT1A1 genotype was found to significantly modify postmenopausal breast cancer risk associated with a high BMI (>or=25 kg/m2) (p for interaction = 0.02), with an adjusted OR of 3.6 (95% CI = 1.5-8.7) for women with the Arg/His genotype compared with 1.1 (0.8-1.5) for women with the Arg/Arg genotype (no His/His genotype was identified in this study population). Similarly, the risk associated with a long duration (>or=30 years) of menstruation also substantially differed by the SULT1A1 genotype (p for interaction = 0.05), with an OR of 4.0 (95% CI = 1.3-12.8) for women with the Arg/His genotype and 1.4 (0.8-2.5) for women with the Arg/Arg genotype. Positive associations with blood levels of steroid hormones were also found generally to be more pronounced among women carrying the His allele. No similar effect modification was found for premenopausal breast cancer, however. These data suggest that the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism may modify the effect of endogenous sex hormone exposures on postmenopausal breast cancer risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gong Yang
- Department of Medicine, Center for Health Services Research and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-8300, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shatalova EG, Walther SE, Favorova OO, Rebbeck TR, Blanchard RL. Genetic polymorphisms in human SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 genes associate with breast tumor characteristics: a case-series study. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R909-21. [PMID: 16280036 PMCID: PMC1410736 DOI: 10.1186/bcr1318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2005] [Revised: 08/12/2005] [Accepted: 08/18/2005] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Estrogens are important in breast cancer development. SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 catalyze estrogen metabolism and are polymorphic. The SULT1A1*2 protein exhibits low activity, and a TA repeat within the UGT1A1 promoter alters the level of expression of the protein. We hypothesized that the SULT1A1*2 allozyme has decreased capacity to sulfate estrogens, that the SULT1A1*2 allele conferred increased capacity of cells to proliferate in response to estrogens, and that individuals with the variant SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 genotypes exhibited different breast tumor characteristics. METHODS The capacity for SULT1A1*2 to sulfate 17beta-estradiol and the capacity for cells expressing SULT1A1*1 or SULT1A1*2 to proliferate in response to 17beta-estradiol was evaluated. A case-series study was performed in a total of 210 women with incident breast cancer, including 177 Caucasians, 25 African-Americans and eight women of other ethnic background. The SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 genotypes were determined and a logistic regression model was used to analyze genotype-phenotype associations. RESULTS We determined that the SULT1A1*1/*1 high-activity genotype was associated with tumor size <or=2 cm (odds ratio = 2.63, 95% confidence interval = 1.25-5.56, P = 0.02). Individuals with low-activity UGT1A1 genotypes (UGT1A1*28/*28 or UGT1A1*28/*34) were more likely to have an age at diagnosis >or=60 years (odds ratio = 3.70, 95% confidence interval = 1.33-10.00, P = 0.01). Individuals with both SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 high-activity genotypes had low tumor grade (odds ratio = 2.56, 95% confidence interval = 1.04-6.25, P = 0.05). Upon stratification by estrogen receptor status, significant associations were observed predominantly in estrogen receptor-negative tumors. CONCLUSION The data suggest that genetic variation in SULT1A1 and UGT1A1 may influence breast cancer characteristics and might be important for breast cancer prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina G Shatalova
- Department of Pharmacology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Russian State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Susan E Walther
- Department of Pharmacology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Fetal and Maternal Medicine, Drexel Center for Genetics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olga O Favorova
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Russian State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Timothy R Rebbeck
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca L Blanchard
- Department of Pharmacology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Merck & Co., Inc., Blue Bell, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Le Marchand L, Donlon T, Kolonel LN, Henderson BE, Wilkens LR. Estrogen Metabolism-Related Genes and Breast Cancer Risk: The Multiethnic Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1998-2003. [PMID: 16103451 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Common polymorphisms in genes that affect estrogen levels may be associated with breast cancer risk. We investigated the associations between breast cancer and sequence variants in several genes in the estradiol/estrone metabolism pathway (CYP1A1*2A, CYP1A2*1F, CYP1B1 Leu432Val, CYP3A4*1B, COMT Val158Met, SULT1A1Arg213His) as well as the Arg554Lys variant in AHR (a transcription factor for CYP1A1, CYP1A2, and CYP1B1) in a case-control study of 1,339 breast cancer cases and 1,370 controls nested in the Multiethnic Cohort Study. The Multiethnic Cohort Study is a large prospective study of men and predominantly postmenopausal women of Japanese, White, African American, Latino, and Native Hawaiian ancestry, residing in Hawaii and Los Angeles. We found no association between breast cancer and these polymorphisms, except for CYP1A2*1F which was inversely associated with risk. The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for the AA, AC, and CC genotype was 1.0, 0.9 (0.7-1.0), and 0.7 (0.5-1.0), respectively (P for gene dosage effect=0.03). This association seemed somewhat stronger for estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)-negative tumors than for ER/PR-positive tumors, and no statistically significant interaction with estrogen-related risk factors was detected. The findings provide no evidence for a role of COMT Val58Met, CYP1A1*2A, CYP3A4*1B, CYP1B1 Leu432Val, SULT1A1 Arg213His, and AHR Arg554Lys in breast cancer etiology. They also provide support for an inverse association between CYP1A2*1F and breast cancer, which is consistent with the observation of lower circulating estrogen levels in premenopausal women with the CC genotype in a previous study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Le Marchand
- Etiology Program, Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, University of Hawaii, Suite 407, 1236 Lauhala Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Choi JY, Lee KM, Park SK, Noh DY, Ahn SH, Chung HW, Han W, Kim JS, Shin SG, Jang IJ, Yoo KY, Hirvonen A, Kang D. Genetic Polymorphisms of SULT1A1 and SULT1E1 and the Risk and Survival of Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1090-5. [PMID: 15894657 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-04-0688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We examined whether common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in SULT1A1 (c.779G>A, *14A>G, and *85C>T) and SULT1E1 (IVS1-447C>A, IVS4-1653T>C, and *959G>A) genes influenced the risk and survival of breast cancer. Our study population consisted of 989 histologically confirmed sporadic breast cancer patients and 1,054 controls without history of cancer recruited from three teaching hospitals in Seoul. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated by logistic regression model. In the survival analysis for 529 breast cancer patients with completed treatments, the hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with Cox proportional hazard model. Women with the SULT1E1 *959 GA/AA genotype had a moderately decreased breast cancer risk compared with those with the GG genotypes (OR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.70-1.00). When the haplotypes were considered, the homozygous *959 AA genotype together with the IVS4-1653 T>C base change (CTA-CCA haplotype) was associated with halved breast cancer risk (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.24-0.88) compared with the wild type CTG-CTG haplotype. No other significant overall association was observed between the SULT1A1 and SULT1E1 SNPs nor haplotypes and breast cancer risk. When stratified by survival, patients with the SULT1E1 IVS4-1653 TC/CC genotypes showed a >3-fold risk of recurrence (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.39-7.48) compared with those with the TT genotype. Moreover, when the haplotypes were considered, the SULT1E1 *959 G>A base change together with the IVS4-1653 T>C base change (CTG-CCA haplotype) was associated with a >4-fold risk of breast cancer (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.15-15.15). These findings suggest that genetic polymorphisms of SULT1E1 are associated with increased risk and a disease free survival of breast cancer in Korean women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Yeob Choi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 28 Yongon-Dong Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-799, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lilla C, Risch A, Kropp S, Chang-Claude J. SULT1A1 genotype, active and passive smoking, and breast cancer risk by age 50 years in a German case-control study. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R229-37. [PMID: 15743503 PMCID: PMC1064130 DOI: 10.1186/bcr976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2004] [Revised: 11/22/2004] [Accepted: 11/25/2004] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sulfotransferase 1A1 (encoded by SULT1A1) is involved in the metabolism of procarcinogens such as heterocyclic amines and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, both of which are present in tobacco smoke. We recently reported a differential effect of N-acetyltransferase (NAT) 2 genotype on the association between active and passive smoking and breast cancer. Additional investigation of a common SULT1A1 genetic polymorphism associated with reduced enzyme activity and stability might therefore provide deeper insight into the modification of breast cancer susceptibility. METHODS We conducted a population-based case-control study in Germany. A total of 419 patients who had developed breast cancer by age 50 years and 884 age-matched control individuals, for whom risk factor information and detailed smoking history were available, were included in the analysis. Genotyping was performed using a fluorescence-based melting curve analysis method. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to estimate breast cancer risk associated with the SULT1A1 Arg213His polymorphism alone and in combination with NAT2 genotype in relation to smoking. RESULTS The overall risk for breast cancer in women who were carriers of at least one SULT1A1*2 allele was not significantly different from that for women with the SULT1A1*1/*1 genotype (adjusted odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.06). Risk for breast cancer with respect to several smoking variables did not differ substantially between carriers of the *2 allele and noncarriers. However, among NAT2 fast acetylators, the odds ratio associated with passive smoking only (3.23, 95% confidence interval 1.05-9.92) was elevated in homozygous carriers of the SULT1A1*1 allele but not in carriers of the SULT1A1*2 allele (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 0.50-3.31). CONCLUSION We found no evidence that the SULT1A1 genotype in itself modifies breast cancer risk associated with smoking in women up to age 50 years. In combination with NAT2 fast acetylator status, however, the SULT1A1*1/*1 genotype might increase breast cancer risk in women exposed to tobacco smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Lilla
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Risch
- Division of Toxicology and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Silke Kropp
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Langsenlehner U, Krippl P, Renner W, Yazdani-Biuki B, Eder T, Wolf G, Wascher TC, Paulweber B, Weitzer W, Samonigg H. Genetic Variants of the Sulfotransferase 1A1 and Breast Cancer Risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 87:19-22. [PMID: 15377847 DOI: 10.1023/b:brea.0000041574.90735.ea] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1), also designated as phenol-preferring sulfotransferase, is involved in the bioactivation and detoxification of a variety of potential carcinogens, including iodothyronines, hydroxylated aromatic amines, and phenolic xenobiotics. A common arginine (R) to histidine (H) polymorphism at amino acid position 213 influences SULT1A1 activity and has been suggested as risk factor for a different types of cancers. To investigate the role of this polymorphism for breast cancer risk, SULT1A1 genotype was determined in 500 women with clinically verified breast cancer and 500 female age-matched healthy control subjects. Frequencies of heterozygous (controls: 42.5% patients: 50.2%) or homozygous (controls: 12.6%; patients: 9.4%) carriers of the 213H variant were not significantly different between groups. The SULT1A1 genotype was furthermore not associated with tumor size, histological grading, estrogen or progesterone receptor status and age at diagnosis. The SULT1A1 213H variant was associated with the presence of lymph node metastases (p = 0.002). We conclude that the SULT1A1 R213H polymorphism is not a general risk factor for breast cancer, but may be involved in lymph node metastazing in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Langsenlehner
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|