Toe brachial index and not ankle brachial index is appropriate in initial evaluation of peripheral arterial disease in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive clinic-based tools for assessing PAD are not without limitations. Therefore, costly tests like Doppler study, CT angiography and MR angiography are often required to make a diagnosis. Ankle brachial index (ABI), commonly used for assessment of PAD, has high false positivity rates in sclerosed, calcified arteries which render them non-compressible. Toe brachial index (TBI) can be an alternative, as digital arteries are relatively unaffected by these changes.

AIM

To compare the reliability of ABI and TBI in diagnosing PAD in type 2 diabetes using CT angiography (CTA) as the reference.

METHODS

175 adults with T2D were selected. ABI &TBI were measured with an automated vascular Doppler XT 6 ports bilaterally for all subjects. For any subject, the limb with lower ABI and TBI was included for analysis. ABI < 0.9 & TBI < 0.6 were taken as evidence of PAD. CTA showing > 50% narrowing was taken as evidence of PAD.

RESULTS

24% of our study subjects had CTA confirmed PAD. ABI has low sensitivity of 35.29% (95% CI 0.21-0.52) compared to TBI being 82.35% (95% CI 0.66-0.92). The specificity however was similar. ABI < 0.9 was able to detect CTA confirmed PAD, but ABI > 0.9, including the so-called normal ABI (0.9-1.3) was unable to detect PAD. ROC showed ABI at 1.005 has sensitivity 64.71% (95% CI 0.48- 0.79) and specificity 61.7% (95% CI 0.53-0.69) and TBI at 0.6 has sensitivity 82.35% (95% CI 0.66-0.92) & specificity 92% (95% CI 0.87-0.96). Utilizing Cohen's Kappa, the reliability of ABI with respect to CTA showed fair agreement (K = 0.225, p = 0.001), whereas the reliability of TBI with respect to CTA showed substantial agreement (K = 0.759, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ABI < 0.9 detects PAD reliably, but presence of PAD in patients with ABI > 9.0 including the normal of ABI (0.9-1.3) can be confirmed with TBI, which correlated strongly with CTA. TBI is also non-inferior for PAD detection, when ABI < 0.9. TBI and not ABI can be utilized for initial assessment of PAD in subjects with T2D.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Peripheral Arterial Disease

Significance: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) leads to a significant burden of morbidity and impaired quality of life globally. Diabetes is a significant risk factor accelerating the development of PAD with an associated increase in the risk of chronic wounds, tissue, and limb loss. Various magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques are being increasingly acknowledged as useful methods of accurately assessing PAD. Recent Advances: Conventionally utilized MRI techniques for assessing macrovascular disease have included contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), noncontrast time of flight MRA, and phase contrast MRI, but have significant limitations. In recent years, novel noncontrast MRI methods assessing skeletal muscle perfusion and metabolism such as arterial spin labeling (ASL), blood-oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) imaging, and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) have emerged. Critical Issues: Conventional non-MRI (such as ankle-brachial index, arterial duplex ultrasonography, and computed tomographic angiography) and MRI based modalities image the macrovasculature. The underlying mechanisms of PAD that result in clinical manifestations are, however, complex, and imaging modalities that can assess the interaction between impaired blood flow, microvascular tissue perfusion, and muscular metabolism are necessary. Future Directions: Further development and clinical validation of noncontrast MRI methods assessing skeletal muscle perfusion and metabolism, such as ASL, BOLD, CEST, intravoxel incoherent motion microperfusion, and techniques that assess plaque composition, are advancing this field. These modalities can provide useful prognostic data and help in reliable surveillance of outcomes after interventions.

The Role of Imaging in Peripheral Interventions

Patient evaluation is critical to identify and quantitate patient's disease. Aside from the patient's history and physical examination, imaging can help confirm and determine the extent of disease. Imaging can aid in treatment planning once the decision to proceed to intervention has been made. This chapter will discuss the role of imaging before and after peripheral arterial interventions and how it may improve intervention outcomes. It will discuss the value of the arterial noninvasive examinations (ankle-brachial index, toe-brachial index, pulse volume recordings, and arterial duplex ultrasound), computed tomographic angiograms, magnetic resonance angiogram, and intravascular ultrasound.

Catheter based interventions for lower extremity peripheral artery disease

The field of peripheral arterial intervention has exploded over the past 20 years. Current knowledge includes a growing evidence base for treatment as well as a myriad of new interventional approaches to complex disease. This review seeks to outline the current state of the art for interventional approaches to lower extremity peripheral arterial disease.

Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects >230 million adults worldwide and is associated with increased risk of various adverse clinical outcomes (other cardiovascular diseases such as coronary heart disease and stroke and leg outcomes such as amputation). Despite its prevalence and clinical importance, PAD has been historically underappreciated by health care professionals and patients. This underappreciation seems multifactorial (eg, limited availability of the first-line diagnostic test, the ankle-brachial index, in clinics; incorrect perceptions that a leg vascular disease is not fatal and that the diagnosis of PAD would not necessarily change clinical practice). In the past several years, a body of evidence has indicated that these perceptions are incorrect. Several studies have consistently demonstrated that many patients with PAD are not receiving evidence-based therapies. Thus, this scientific statement provides an update for health care professionals regarding contemporary epidemiology (eg, prevalence, temporal trends, risk factors, and complications) of PAD, the present status of diagnosis (physiological tests and imaging modalities), and the major gaps in the management of PAD (eg, medications, exercise therapy, and revascularization). The statement also lists key gaps in research, clinical practice, and implementation related to PAD. Orchestrated efforts among different parties (eg, health care providers, researchers, expert organizations, and health care organizations) will be needed to increase the awareness and understanding of PAD and improve the diagnostic approaches, management, and prognosis of PAD.