Different methods of local allergen-specific immunotherapy

Sublingual immunotherapy: a novel, albeit not so new, immunotherapy treatment modality

BACKGROUND

Specific allergy immunotherapy traditionally has been thought of as subcutaneous injection immunotherapy (SCIT). There also are noninjection routes for the administration of immunotherapy. The best-known and studied of these noninjection routes is the sublingual route, usually known as sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). SLIT has been in use for many decades; however, to this date, it is not well known to the majority of allergy practitioners in this country. The purpose of this study is to help change this perception so that SLIT eventually can be considered one more tool in the allergist's armamentarium.

METHODS

A literature review was performed. It included articles from the early American clinicians and present publications that are mostly of European origin.

RESULTS

It will become clear to the reader that the key features of SLIT are its efficacy, great safety, and simplicity of administration.

CONCLUSION

SLIT is a safe treatment modality that should be considered as a useful additional tool in the therapeutic armamentarium.

Intradermal immunization with ovalbumin-loaded poly-?-caprolactone microparticles conferred protection in ovalbumin-sensitized allergic mice

BACKGROUND

Although immunotherapy has been reported as the only treatment able to revert the T-helper type 2 (Th2) response, its administration has some disadvantages such as the requirement of multiple doses, possible side-effects provoked by conventional adjuvants and the risk of suffering an anaphylactic shock. For these reasons, drug-delivery systems appear to be a promising strategy due to its ability to (i) transport the allergens, (ii) protect them from degradation, (iii) decrease the number of administrations and (iv) act as immuno-adjuvants.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the properties of poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL) microparticles as adjuvants in immunotherapy using ovalbumin (OVA) as an allergen model. For this purpose, the protection capacity of these microparticles (OVA PCL) against OVA allergy was studied in a murine model.

METHODS

The humoral and cellular-induced immune response generated by OVA encapsulated into PCL microparticles was studied by immunizing BALB/c mice intradermically. Also, OVA-sensitized mice were treated with OVA PCL and OVA adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide (OVA-Alum). Fifteen days after therapy, animals were challenged with OVA and different signs of anaphylactic shock were evaluated.

RESULTS

One single shot by an intradermal route with OVA PCL resulted in a Th2-type immune response. In OVA-sensitized mice, treatment with OVA PCL elicited high OVA-specific IgG but low levels of IgE. Furthermore, OVA PCL mice group displayed lower levels of serum histamine and higher survival rate in comparison with the positive control group.

CONCLUSION

The anaphylactic shock suffered by OVA PCL-treated mice was weaker than the one induced in the OVA-Alum group. Hence, the intradermal immunization with OVA PCL microparticles induced hyposensitization in OVA-allergic mice.

A recombinant allergen chimer as novel mucosal vaccine candidate for prevention of multi-sensitivities

BACKGROUND

As conventional immunotherapy is less efficacious in patients with allergic multi-sensitivities compared with mono-sensitized subjects, new intervention strategies are needed. Therefore, an allergen chimer was genetically engineered for treatment of multi-sensitization with birch and grass pollen on the basis of mucosal tolerance induction.

METHODS

The major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 served as a scaffold for N- and C-terminal linkage of the immunodominant peptides of the grass pollen allergens Phl p 1 and Phl p 5 and this new construct was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. After purification, physicochemical and immunological characterization the chimer was used for intranasal tolerance induction prior to poly-sensitization with Bet v 1, Phl p 1 and Phl p 5.

RESULTS

The immunological characterization revealed that the conformation of Bet v 1 within the chimer was comparable to that of natural as well as recombinant Bet v 1. The chimer was immunogenic in mice for T and B cell responses to the three allergens. Intranasal application of the chimer prior to poly-sensitization significantly suppressed humoral and cellular allergen-specific Th2 responses and prevented development of airway inflammation upon allergen challenge. Moreover, local allergen-specific IgA antibodies were induced by the chimer. The mechanisms of poly-tolerance induction seemed to be mediated by regulatory cytokines, since TGF-beta and IL-10 mRNA in splenocytes were upregulated and tolerance was transferable with these cells.

CONCLUSION

The data indicate that such allergen chimers harboring several unrelated allergens or allergen peptides could serve as mucosal polyvalent vaccines for prevention of multi-sensitivities.

Prophylactic Intranasal Treatment with Fragments of 1,3-β-Glucanase Olive Pollen Allergen Prevents Airway Inflammation in a Murine Model of Type I Allergy

BACKGROUND

Olive pollen is an important cause of allergy in Mediterranean countries. More than 50% of olive-pollen-allergic patients are sensitized against the 1,3-beta-glucanase Ole e 9. To date, prophylactic and therapeutic treatments using purified recombinant allergens have not been studied in animal models of olive pollen allergy.

METHODS

BALB/c mice were immunized against Ole e 9 combining intraperitoneal injections of the allergen in Al(OH)3 with airway allergen challenges. A prophylactic treatment was performed by intranasal administration of a mixture of the recombinant fragments of the allergen prior to Ole e 9 sensitization. Serum levels of specific IgE, IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b were measured by ELISA, and total IgE levels by sandwich ELISA. Bronchoalveolar lavage and lungs from mice were collected to study airway inflammation by light microscopy.

RESULTS

BALB/c mice immunized against Ole e 9 developed a predominantly Th2-like immune response with allergen-specific immunoglobulin induction and airway inflammation accompanied by the infiltration of eosinophils, lymphocytes, and neutrophils in the lung. Prophylactic treatment by intranasal application of the recombinant fragments of Ole e 9 avoids airway inflammation induced by sensitization with this allergen although the levels of Ole e 9-specific antibodies remain unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic intranasal treatment with recombinant fragments of Ole e 9 prevents airway inflammation triggered by immunization to this allergen in a murine model of type I allergy.

The role of Foxp3+ T cells in long-term efficacy of prophylactic and therapeutic mucosal tolerance induction in mice

BACKGROUND

Mucosal tolerance induction is suggested as treatment strategy for allergic diseases. Using a murine model of birch pollen (BP) allergy we investigated the long-term efficacy and the underlying mechanisms of mucosal tolerance induction with two structurally different molecules in a prophylactic and in a therapeutic set-up.

METHODS

The three-dimensional major BP allergen Bet v 1 or a nonconformational hypoallergenic fragment thereof was intranasally applied before (prophylaxis) or after sensitization (therapy).

RESULTS

In the prophylactic application both the Bet v 1 allergen and the fragment prevented allergic sensitization, and this effect lasted for 1 year. In the therapeutic approach established allergic immune responses were also suppressed after treatment with either of the molecules. However, a long-lasting curative effect (6 months) was only achieved with the Bet v 1 allergen but not with the Bet v 1 fragment. Real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of splenocytes revealed that tolerance induction with the Bet v 1 allergen was associated with enhanced expression of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, interleukin (IL)-10, and Foxp3 mRNA in CD4+ T cells, whereas treatment with the fragment led to the induction of either Foxp3 (prophylaxis) or IL-10 (therapy) alone.

CONCLUSION

From these data we concluded (i) that the mechanisms underlying peripheral tolerance are linked to the conformation of the antigen, (ii) that mucosal tolerance is mediated by separate regulatory cell subsets, and (iii) that the long-term efficacy of immunosuppression is associated with the presence of Foxp3+ T cells.

Peptide-based vaccination: where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allergen-specific immunotherapy represents the only causative approach towards allergy treatment. Specific immunotherapy can, however, include allergic reactions and occasionally life-threatening anaphylaxis. Peptides have been evaluated as a potential therapeutic approach in atopic allergic disease because they have the potential to inhibit T-cell function but not induce anaphylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from early clinical trials of peptide vaccination revealed that therapy was associated with a modest improvement in allergic disease, and was accompanied by a high frequency of adverse reactions. More recent studies have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes, improved safety, and have defined the mechanisms of adverse events observed in earlier studies. Mechanisms of peptide vaccination include the hyporesponsiveness of allergen-specific responses and the induction of regulatory T cells and cytokines. Novel peptide design has allowed the generation of fragments that contain T-cell stimulatory epitopes, lack B cell epitopes, and can induce protective IgG responses in both mice and humans. Other approaches have focused on hypoallergenic B-cell epitopes that induce inhibitory IgG antibodies. Peptides that specifically induce regulatory cytokine production would also enhance peptide vaccines. Several recent studies have described immunodominant epitopes from major allergens that may form candidate peptides for use in peptide vaccination.

SUMMARY

The manipulation of peptide epitopes may provide a strategy for the rational design of peptide allergy vaccines further improving safety and efficacy.

Crystal structure and some properties of a major house dust mite allergen, Derf 2

Pyroglyphid house dust mites are a major source of allergens in house dust. Mite allergens sensitize and induce asthma, rhinitis, and eczema in a large portion of patients with allergic diseases. Here, the crystal structure of a major mite allergen, Derf 2, derived from Dermatophagoides farinae was solved by single isomorphous replacement method with anomalous scattering (SIRAS) at 2.1A resolution. The present study also demonstrated that the conformation of the allergen was critical in the determination of Th1/Th2 shift based on physicochemical and immunological analyses. This indicates that rigidly folded and singly dispersed structure is essentially required for the generation of Th2 type cells by the allergen, while conformational variant protein leads to Th1 skewing, irrespective of the same amino acid sequence. This structure/function relationship may allow us to develop a novel strategy for hyposensitization therapy in patients with allergic diseases triggered by house dust mite allergens.

Allergen-specific immunosuppression by ovalbumin fused with diphtheria toxin in mice sensitized with albumins of different origin

BACKGROUND

We previously reported that ovalbumin-diphtheria toxin (OVA-DT) fusion protein eliminates mast cells bearing OVA-specific IgE and protects OVA-sensitized mice from fatal anaphylaxis induced by OVA challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To prove the specificity of therapeutic effect of OVA-DT to allergy induced by OVA only and not by other allergens such as human serum albumin (HSA), and to examine the cytotoxic effect of OVA-DT on B cells bearing OVA-specific IgE.

METHODS

Mice were sensitized with two different antigens, OVA and HSA, and then treated with OVA-DT. The therapeutic effect of OVA-DT on the allergy response to each of allergen was evaluated by anaphylactic test. The effect of OVA-DT on the production of allergen-specific Ig isotypes of the sensitized mice and the cytotoxic effect of OVA-DT on B cells expressing OVA-specific IgE were examined.

RESULTS

OVA-DT suppressed only OVA-induced allergy but not HSA-induced allergy in mice sensitized with a mixture of OVA and HSA. The suppression was prolonged even to the mice boosted with the same allergen 14 days after last treatment of OVA-DT. In addition, when the sensitized mice were boosted with the same allergens 14 days after last treatment of OVA-DT, the mice showed to increase the production of OVA-specific IgG2a/IgG3 and decreased that of OVA-specific IgE. OVA-DT targeted B cells bearing OVA-specific IgE, and killed them by DT-mediated cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of OVA-DT was specific to OVA-induced allergy and the suppression of OVA-induced allergy was continuously shown in the mice boosted with the same allergens. This is considered to be caused by the increase of OVA-specific IgG2a and IgG3, and because of the decrease of OVA-specific IgE by killing of B cells bearing OVA-specific IgE.

Sublingual and oral immunotherapy

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is a viable alternative to the subcutaneous route for the treatment of respiratory allergy, whereas the pure oral route has been abandoned because of its lack of efficacy. The main distinctive feature of SLIT is its optimal safety profile, which has been demonstrated in adults and children. The indications for SLIT are similar to those for the subcutaneous route. A long-lasting effect has been demonstrated for the sublingual route, but data are needed to determine the optimal dose and the preventive effect in asthma.

Adjuvants for allergen immunotherapy: experimental results and clinical perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inclusion of adjuvants in immunotherapy vaccines are important to enhance immune responses to allergens. This article will cover the recent advances in adjuvant formulations described in published articles primarily over the past 2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Traditionally, allergen immunotherapy preparations utilize aluminium hydroxide as an adjuvant. These have generally proved efficacious and have a good safety profile. However, recent advances in the understanding of immunological mechanisms underlying immunotherapy and in the design of new adjuvants may allow a more rational approach to adjuvant use. One approach is to use adjuvants such as immunostimulatory sequences or monophosphoryl lipid A, which can deviate allergy-associated Th2 immune responses towards a Th1 phenotype. Both of these adjuvants have been used in pilot controlled clinical trials which have demonstrated clinical efficacy and the induction of protective IgG antibodies. Other approaches to improve immunotherapy vaccines include microencapsulation of allergen to allow delivery of the allergen directly to the gut in order to induce immunological tolerance and vaccination with heat-killed mycobacteria.

SUMMARY

There is great interest in newly designed adjuvants to improve the efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy. A better understanding of immunological mechanisms and further clinical trials utilizing new adjuvants are needed.

Randomized controlled open study of sublingual immunotherapy for respiratory allergy in real-life: clinical efficacy and more

BACKGROUND

Some aspects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) still need to be addressed: magnitude of the clinical efficacy, effect on the bronchial hyperreactivity adherence to treatment, preventive effect. We attempted to clarify these points in a randomized open, controlled, two parallel group study in a real-life setting.

METHODS

Five hundred and eleven patients with allergic rhinitis with or without intermittent asthma were randomized to drugs only or drugs + SLIT (rate 2 : 3) for 3 years. The clinical score (symptoms + drug intake) was measured each year during the allergen exposure. Pulmonary function test, methacholine challenge and skin tests were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study. Adherence to treatment was assessed by measuring the consumed extract.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nineteen patients received SLIT and 192 drugs only. Dropouts were 15% in the SLIT group and 12% in the controls. There was a significant improvement of clinical scores in the SLIT group: baseline 147 +/- 3.3, first year 72.9 +/- 1.3, second year 68.3 +/- 1.8, third year 54.7 +/- 2.8 (P < 0.0001 vs baseline).

CONTROL GROUP

baseline 138 +/- 2.3, first year 124.1 +/- 3.7, second year 111 +/- 3.3, third year 121 +/- 3.8 (P = NS). Only four patients reported systemic itching. Adherence was >80% in 72% and >60% in 18% of patients. The number of patients with a positive MCh challenge decreased significantly after 3 years only in the SLIT group. New skin sensitizations appeared in 38% of the controls and in 5.9% of the SLIT patients (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Sublingual immunotherapy approximately halved the clinical scores and significantly reduced the bronchial hyperreactivity. Similarly to subcutaneous immunotherapy, SLIT displayed a preventive effect on the onset of new skin sensitizations. The adherence rate was quantitatively satisfactory.

Animal models of type I allergy using recombinant allergens

Various animal models including guinea pigs, monkeys, dogs, rats, and mice have been established in an attempt to provide insights into the complex immunological and pathophysiological mechanisms of human type I allergic diseases. The detailed knowledge of the murine genome, the various components of the murine immune system, and the generation of engineered mice has made the murine system the most attractive among all animal models. The availability of multitude technologies and reagents to characterize and manipulate immunological pathways and mediators adds to the outstanding opportunities to assess the pathology of allergic diseases and to develop novel therapeutic strategies in mice. Numerous sensitization protocols with food and aero-allergens are used to establish an allergic/asthma-like phenotype in mice. Requirements for an appropriate murine model include a close resemblance to the pathology of the disease in humans, the objective measurement of the physiologic parameters, as well as reliability and reproducibility of the experimental data. With respect to reproducible experimental conditions, it has been recognized that extract preparations from natural allergen sources can vary in their allergen-content and -composition. This might influence the degree of sensitization or the outcome of treatment strategies in dependence of the applied extract preparation. The use of recombinant allergens in experimental in vivo and in vitro systems can overcome these problems. Another aspect, that has become obvious from the experimental studies, is that allergens can differ in their immunogenicity as well as in their capacity to act as tolerogens. Therefore, it seems important that the efficacy of the different allergen-molecules to act as therapeutic agents is individually examined. In this review, examples of animal models are described, in which recombinant allergens have been used for sensitization and/or treatment of allergic responses and how they have been used to enhance our understanding of the pathology of allergic diseases.

Sublingual immunotherapy in asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis; systematic review of paediatric literature

AIMS

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in respiratory allergy in children.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted. The search was focused on all the double blind (and double dummy if necessary) studies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trial Register, Abstract of Cochrane Airways Group, hand search, and archives of some SLIT producers. All the selected studies were assessed and evaluated for quality in a standardised independent way.

RESULTS

Eight randomised, double blind, placebo controlled studies on SLIT were selected. Five studies were run with house dust mite (HDM), one with olive pollen, one with wall pellitory (Parietaria) pollen, and one with grass pollen. A quantitative evaluation of the studies was not possible because the outcomes and the results of single studies were presented according to different criteria. Therefore only qualitative analysis was performed. No clinically relevant results were shown, independently from statistical significance, in the use of SLIT for respiratory allergies due to seasonal allergens (olive, wall pellitory, and grass pollens) and, on the whole, for rhinoconjunctivitis due to HDM in children. For mild to moderate persistent asthma due to HDM, statistically significant and low to moderate relevant clinical effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

SLIT can be currently considered to have low to moderate clinical efficacy in children of at least 4 years of age, monosensitised to HDM, and suffering from mild to moderate persistent asthma. This benefit seems to be adjunctive with respect to the environmental preventive measures against HDM.

Clinical efficacy of microencapsulated timothy grass pollen extract in grass-allergic individuals

BACKGROUND

Conventional allergen immunotherapy is clinically effective in reducing the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and asthma. It differs from other pharmacotherapies in that it can induce long-term clinical remission of these diseases. However, it requires years of treatment and is associated with serious allergic reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety, clinical efficacy, and immunologic mechanisms of immunotherapy with an oral, microencapsulated form of timothy grass allergen.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 24 patients aged 19 to 55 years with grass pollen allergy were randomized to receive either microencapsulated timothy grass pollen extract or placebo once a day for 10 weeks. The dose of study drug was doubled weekly. Safety was evaluated through weekly visits, daily symptom diaries, and routine laboratory tests. Efficacy was evaluated by comparing medication use and symptoms scores during peak grass pollen season before and after treatment. Allergen-specific T-cell responses, cytokine production, and IgG, IgE, and skin reactivity were measured to evaluate immunologic mechanisms.

RESULTS

Eleven of 12 patients in the active treatment group had a decrease in the combined medication and symptom score, but only 4 of 10 patients in the placebo group had a decrease in scores. The proliferative response to timothy grass was reduced by at least 30% in 9 of the 12 grass-treated patients, but only 3 of 11 placebo patients had a proliferative response reduction. Timothy grass-induced interleukin-5 messenger RNA was reduced in the active group, but not in the placebo group. There were no significant changes in either group in IgG, IgE, and skin reactivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral immunotherapy with microencapsulated allergen induces a form of immunologic tolerance to the allergen and is a safe, efficient, and effective method of allergen immunotherapy.

[Sublingual immunotherapy in children. Immunotherapy Committee of the Spanish Society for Clinical Immunology and Pediatric Allergology]

Sublingual immunotherapy is currently attracting growing interest because of its ease of administration and, according to previous studies, its infrequent and mild adverse effects. However, at least in children, the efficacy of this therapy has not been completely demonstrated. In addition, the mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated since few studies have been published and the results have been contradictory and sometimes inconclusive. For this reason, we performed a literature review through the MEDLINE database, selecting double-blind studies carried out in children. Only 10 studies meeting these requirements were retrieved. All the studies were performed by European researchers and nine were published in European journals. Efficacy was evaluated by clinical parameters and by reduction in medication use. The results on efficacy are not homogeneous, although most support the utility of this route of administration. Moreover, reports of allergens other than those used in these studies dust mites and grass pollens are lacking. In conclusion, further studies evaluating the efficacy of this therapy in children are required. Among the general population, if the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in the treatment of sensitization to hymenoptera venoms were demonstrated, as has been the case with subcutaneous immunotherapy, the utility of this route of administration would be definitively confirmed. Finally, sublingual immunotherapy could be used in children who have shown systemic reactions to subcutaneous immunotherapy or who refuse to undergo injections.

Oral and sublingual immunotherapy in paediatric patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sublingual immunotherapy is becoming a routine treatment for respiratory allergy in several countries and it has been validated in international documents. This article will review the available literature on oral and sublingual immunotherapy, discussing the possible use of sublingual immunotherapy in paediatric patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

As oral immunotherapy was found to be poorly effective in clinical trials, its use has been discontinued. In contrast, several controlled studies have shown the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic asthma and rhinitis, and a postmarketing survey has confirmed its safety. Moreover, new data on the long-lasting efficacy of this treatment and on the absence of local immunological effects have recently been published.

SUMMARY

The clinical efficacy and the optimal safety profile of sublingual immunotherapy make it a good candidate for treating respiratory allergy in children. Some aspects, such as the dose-response relationship and preventive effect, will be a research challenge for future developments and better definition of indications in children.

Noninjection routes for immunotherapy

Allergen specific immunotherapy, together with drugs and allergen avoidance, is a cornerstone in the management of respiratory allergy. The traditional subcutaneous route is burdened with the risk of severe adverse events; therefore, safer routes of administration (noninjection or local routes) have been investigated and developed. Controlled trials failed to demonstrate the clinical efficacy and the safety of oral and bronchial administration, and these routes have been abandoned. Local nasal immunotherapy proved effective and safe in 17 of 18 controlled trials; thus it is considered a viable route of immunotherapy. Nevertheless, nasal immunotherapy is effective in rhinitis only and requires a particular administration technique; therefore its use is slowly declining. The sublingual route is supported by numerous controlled trials showing its efficacy in asthma and rhinitis in adults and children. The safety profile, assessed in clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance studies, is satisfactory; the most frequent side effects are gastrointestinal complaints, which can be easily managed by proper dose adjusting. Sublingual immunotherapy is now accepted by the World Health Organization as a valid alternative to the subcutaneous route also in children. Although the long-lasting efficacy has been recently documented for the sublingual route, several points still need to be elucidated, including mechanisms of action, optimal dosage, cost-effectiveness, and adherence.

Immunological mechanisms of specific immunotherapy with pollen vaccines: implications for diagnostics and the development of improved vaccination strategies

This review deals with specific immunotherapy performed with pollen vaccines. Pollen allergens, the immunological mechanism of allergic inflammation and the mechanisms behind successful specific immunotherapy treatment of seasonal pollen allergy shall be discussed. The different approaches to develop improved regimes for specific immunotherapy based on new diagnostic tools, improved pollen vaccines and alternative routes for administration of the vaccines will be highlighted. Diagnostic tools to select patients for specific immunotherapy and for monitoring the treatment are quantitative measurements of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E, G and G4 antibodies and component-resolved diagnostics based on immunoglobulin E binding to individual allergenic components. Future pollen vaccines may consist of hypoallergenic recombinant allergens and T-helper cell type 1-inducing immunostimulatory adjuvants. Both sublingual and nasal administration of pollen vaccines for specific immunotherapy may be used more in future.

Allergy immunotherapy and inhibition of Th2 immune responses: a sufficient strategy?

Th2 immune responses mediated by the secretion of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 are key in the pathogenesis of atopic disorders, including allergen-induced asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis and anaphylaxis. Although such responses are downregulated to some degree by conventional specific immunotherapy, this approach is only partially effective and has a substantial risk of adverse effects. Many strategies for immunotherapeutic prophylaxis and for treatment of atopic diseases have been devised on the basis of mouse allergy and autoimmune models, including the downregulation of Th2 responses by the induction of regulatory T cell activity, Th2 to Th1 immune deviation, Th1 crossregulation of Th2 immune responses, anergy and immunosuppressive cytokines. The blockade of events that are not allergen-specific, such as T cell costimulation and downstream events dependent on IgE, cytokines and chemokines, has also been pursued. With the exception of monoclonal antibody therapy for the blockade of IgE effector function, the application of most of these strategies to humans is at an early stage. Whether the inhibition of Th2 responses without concurrent downregulation of Th1 responses will be sufficient for allergic immunotherapy, particularly for atopic dermatitis and asthma, is an important but unresolved issue.