1
|
Wells I, Zemedikun DT, Simons G, Stack RJ, Mallen CD, Raza K, Falahee M. Predictors of interest in predictive testing for rheumatoid arthritis among first degree relatives of rheumatoid arthritis patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022; 61:3223-3233. [PMID: 34850849 PMCID: PMC9348622 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is increasing interest in prediction and prevention of RA. It is important to understand the views of those at risk to inform the development of effective approaches. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of RA patients are at increased risk of RA. This study assessed predictors of their interest in predictive testing for RA. METHODS Questionnaires were completed by RA patients (provided with their questionnaire by a healthcare professional) and their FDRs (provided with their questionnaire by their RA proband). FDR surveys assessed interest in taking a predictive test, demographic variables, perceived RA risk, attitudes about predictive testing, autonomy preferences, illness perceptions, avoidance coping and health anxiety. Patient surveys included demographic variables, disease impact, RA duration and treatment. Ordinal logistic regression examined the association between FDRs' characteristics and their interest in predictive testing. Generalized estimating equations assessed associations between patient characteristics and FDRs' interest in predictive testing. RESULTS Three hundred and ninety-six FDRs responded. Paired data from the RA proband were available for 292. The proportion of FDRs interested in predictive testing was 91.3%. Information-seeking preferences, beliefs that predictive testing can increase empowerment over health and positive attitudes about risk knowledge were associated with increased interest. Beliefs that predictive testing could cause psychological harm predicted lower interest. Patient characteristics of the proband were not associated with FDRs' interest. CONCLUSIONS FDRs' interest in predictive testing for RA was high, and factors associated with interest were identified. These findings will inform the development of predictive strategies and informational resources for those at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imogen Wells
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences
| | | | - Gwenda Simons
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences
| | - Rebecca J Stack
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - Christian D Mallen
- Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele
| | - Karim Raza
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences.,NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham.,Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust.,MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and the Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Marie Falahee
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haritavorn N, Nimsun C. “Just Hemorrhoids, Not Cancer”: Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Among Thai Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clin Nurs Res 2022; 31:1091-1099. [DOI: 10.1177/10547738221085609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of mortality among Thais. Understanding patients’ perceptions of colorectal cancer can help in the design of educational programs to enhance awareness of colorectal cancer among Thais. This study aims to elucidate illness explanatory models of colorectal cancer and their perceptions of colorectal cancer through the explanatory model. In-depth interviews with 30 patients about their perceptions and experiences of colorectal cancer were subjected to thematic analysis. The findings show that the patients were unaware of colorectal cancer, had misconceptions regarding colorectal cancer detection and screening; they considered the symptoms to be the result of hemorrhoids, karma, and heredity. Their explanatory model underlies the body of knowledge grounded in the lay explanation which results in perception, beliefs, relative experiences, and approaches to illness management. There is a need for further information about colorectal cancer symptoms to assist symptom recognition through cancer education and screening programs.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yanes T, Kaur R, Meiser B, Scheepers-Joynt M, McInerny S, Barlow-Stewart K, Antill Y, Salmon L, Smyth C, James PA, Young MA. Women’s responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information. Fam Cancer 2020; 19:297-306. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00185-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
4
|
Palmero EI, Campacci N, Schüler-Faccini L, Giugliani R, Rocha JCCD, Vargas FR, Ashton-Prolla P. Cancer-related worry and risk perception in Brazilian individuals seeking genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. Genet Mol Biol 2020; 43:e20190097. [PMID: 32325485 PMCID: PMC7210979 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2019-0097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In Brazil, the population in general has little knowledge about genetic risks, as well as regarding the role and importance of the Cancer Genetic Counseling (CGC). The goal of this study was to evaluate cancer-related worry and cancer risk perception during CGC sessions in Brazilian women at-risk for hereditary breast cancer. This study was performed in 264 individuals seeking CGC for hereditary breast cancer. Both cancer-affected and unaffected individuals were included. As results, individuals with and without cancer reported different motivations for seeking CGC and undergoing genetic testing. A correlation was observed between age at the first CGC session and age at which the closest relative was diagnosed with cancer. Multivariate analysis showed that educational level, cancer risk discussion within the family, and number of deaths by cancer among first-degree relatives influenced positively the cancer risk perception. In conclusion, the results of this study indicate that cancer-related worry and cancer risk perception are significant aspects of morbidity in individuals seeking CGC, whether they are cancer-affected or unaffected. CGC has an important role in health education and cancer prevention for its potential of promoting an accurate perception of the risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edenir Inêz Palmero
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Genética, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Natalia Campacci
- Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Centro de Pesquisa em Oncologia Molecular, Barretos, SP, Brazil
| | - Lavinia Schüler-Faccini
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Genética, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | - Roberto Giugliani
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | | | | | - Patricia Ashton-Prolla
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Genética, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.,Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Serviço de Genética Médica, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tillerås KH, Kjoelaas SH, Dramstad E, Feragen KB, von der Lippe C. Psychological reactions to predictive genetic testing for Huntington's disease: A qualitative study. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:1093-1105. [PMID: 32162754 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
There is a lack of qualitative research investigating the experience of individuals at risk for Huntington's disease (HD) during the period prior to undergoing predictive testing, as well as their reaction to the test result. This secondary analysis study aimed to explore the experiences during the predictive testing process of individuals who had been or who were at risk for HD. For the primary study, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. We employed the explorative qualitative design for this study, which involved 33 individuals who had been or who were at risk for HD. Results indicate that many had been anticipating the onset of the disease even before they knew their mutation status. Their choice of whether to get tested or not was influenced by personal, social, and practical factors. Whether the test result was positive or negative, coping with the test result was reported to be difficult. Participants with a mutation-negative result felt a need for more follow-up consultations than what they had received. Findings indicate that the decision to undergo predictive testing for HD was not only a personal choice, but was also influenced by both proximal and distant factors. Similar to individuals who tested positive for the mutation, individuals who tested negative for the mutation may need comprehensive follow-up to adapt to the reality of the test result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine H Tillerås
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Siri H Kjoelaas
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Dramstad
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin B Feragen
- Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital HF, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lagarde JBB, Laurino MY, San Juan MD, Cauyan JML, Tumulak MAJR, Ventura ER. Risk perception and screening behavior of Filipino women at risk for breast cancer: implications for cancer genetic counseling. J Community Genet 2019; 10:281-289. [PMID: 30259342 PMCID: PMC6435779 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0391-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The burden and experiences that come with a breast cancer diagnosis in a family impact how women perceive personal cancer risk and pursue preventive strategies and/or early detection screening. Hence, this study sought to understand how Filipino women incorporate their experiences living with a sister diagnosed with early-onset breast cancer to their personal perceived risk and screening behavior. Guided by phenomenological approach of inquiry, a face-to-face, semi-structured interview was conducted with 12 purposively sampled women with a female sibling diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results revealed that the respondents tend to compare themselves with their sister when constructing views of personal cancer vulnerability. The subjective risk is also shaped by their beliefs regarding cancer causation such as personalistic causes, personal theory of inheritance, and locus of control. Their sisters' cancer diagnoses serve as a motivation for them to perform breast self-examination. However, clinical breast examination and screening mammography are underutilized due to perceived barriers such as difficulty allotting time to medical consultation, fear, and lack of finances. Overall, cancer risk perception and screening behavior are important factors that must be addressed during cancer genetic counseling consultations. Better understanding of these factors will aid in the formulation of an effective management plan for at-risk women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Benedict B Lagarde
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
| | - Mercy Y Laurino
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
- Cancer Prevention Programs, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Michael D San Juan
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Jaclyn Marie L Cauyan
- College of Education, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
| | - Ma-Am Joy R Tumulak
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
- Institute of Human Genetics, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Elizabeth R Ventura
- College of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Where culture meets genetics: Exploring Latina immigrants' lay beliefs of disease inheritance. Soc Sci Med 2019; 271:112179. [PMID: 30853189 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Revised: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
As medical genetic services become a standard part of healthcare, it will become increasingly important to understand how individuals interpret and use genetic information. Exploring lay beliefs of disease inheritance that differ along cultural lines is one research strategy. The purpose of this study was to describe conceptualizations of disease inheritance held by members of the Latina immigrant population in the United States. Semi-structured interviews were employed to gather qualitative, exploratory data from 20 Latina immigrant women. All interviews were conducted in Spanish, and thematic analysis was used to analyze interview transcripts. Demographic and acculturation data were also collected and analyzed. The final sample was diverse in age, time lived in the United States, country of birth, and education level. From participant interviews, the authors identified one dominant model of disease inheritance to which most participants ascribed as well as two non-dominant models. The main model was characterized by a focus on the ability to modify an underlying disease risk, especially in the case of hereditary predisposition to common complex disease. Of the non-dominant models, one focused on genetic disease as extraordinary and less modifiable while the other placed less emphasis on the role of genes in health and greater emphasis on non-genetic factors. Across these models, participants expressed their uncertainty about their understanding of genetics. Many of the themes that arose from the interviews, including uncertainty in their own understanding of genetics, were similar to those seen in studies among other populations. Importantly, participants in this study demonstrated a lack of genetic fatalism, which may allay fears that explaining the role of genetics in common health conditions will reduce uptake of positive health behaviors. These findings have practice implications for healthcare providers communicating genetic information to Latina immigrants.
Collapse
|
8
|
"There is a chance for me" - Risk communication in advanced maternal age genetic counseling sessions in South Africa. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62:390-396. [PMID: 30599214 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Providing risk information is central to genetic counseling. Many studies have examined risk communication, but the focus has been on professional and patient perspectives. Less information is available on risk communication in interactions. This study aimed to examine genetic counselors' (GCs) risks communication in multicultural genetic counseling sessions with women of advanced maternal age (AMA). Six GCs (2-20 years' experience) conducted AMA sessions in English (women's second language). The sessions were video and voice recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using conversation analysis (CA). CA examines discourse as a topic, i.e. describing the turns, its functions and how these functions are accomplished. Analysis revealed that the GCs presented the risk of having a baby with a chromosome abnormality in several ways and that they invite the women to reflect on the risk information. This discussion was found to be a five step process and showed that the women responded to the invitation to reflect rather than the risk information itself by providing additional information. The counselors in the majority of the sessions responded to this additional information the women provided. It therefore seems that the way in which risks are presented are less important than the meaning of the risks for the women. The research showed the power of interactional research such as CA methodology to gain new insights into old problems. Importantly, the study revealed some on the nuances of risk communication in genetic counseling and has implications for practice.
Collapse
|
9
|
Roberts J, Archer L, DeWitt J, Middleton A. Popular culture and genetics; friend, foe or something more complex? Eur J Med Genet 2018; 62:368-375. [PMID: 30590173 PMCID: PMC6626485 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
While many people enjoy popular culture, these transactional experiences may not translate into formal or academic learning about a subject. In education and science communication settings popular culture is often presented as a source of inaccurate information about science. Different publics are often positioned as, at best, undiscriminating consumers and at worst victims of distorted scientific information. We explore how people use their own knowledge and interests to engage with genetics. Here, data from family interviews are used to illustrate how participants draw on popular culture as a resource to engage with and articulate their beliefs about genetics. Using qualitative data from family interviews we describe two perspectives: first, popular culture represents a source of narratives and metaphors used for rhetorical purposes. Second participants used fictional narratives in more depth - as sense-making devices - allowing people to explore the moral and ethical implications of genetics. We argue that by utilising patients' interests - such as popular culture - we can potentially enrich communication in a genetic counselling context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Roberts
- Wellcome Genome Campus, Society and Ethics Research and Addenbrooke's Hospital, United Kingdom.
| | - Louise Archer
- University College London, Institute of Education, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer DeWitt
- University College London, Institute of Education, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Middleton
- Wellcome Genome Campus Society and Ethics Research and Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
High-risk women's risk perception after receiving personalized polygenic breast cancer risk information. J Community Genet 2018; 10:197-206. [PMID: 30097836 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0378-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Evidence is accumulating of the clinical utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to effectively stratify risk of breast cancer. Yet for this personalized polygenic information to be translated to clinical practice, consideration is needed about how this personalized risk information should be communicated and the impact on risk perception. This study examined the psychosocial implications and the impact on risk perception of communicating personalized polygenic breast cancer risk to high-risk women. High-risk women with a personal history of breast cancer and an uninformative BRCA1/2 result were genotyped in the Variants in Practice study for 22 breast cancer single nucleotide polymorphisms. Participants in the highest quartile of polygenic breast cancer risk were invited to receive their individual research results. Two personalized visual risk communication tools were used to facilitate communication of the polygenic information. Participants subsequently undertook a semi-structured interview examining their experience of receiving their polygenic breast cancer risk and their breast cancer risk perception. Thirty-nine women opted to receive their results and were interviewed. The women described the risk communication tools as helpful as the tool enabled comparison of their personalized breast cancer risk to the general population. Participants incorporated the polygenic risk information into their breast cancer risk perception, which for some reawakened feelings of being at risk years after an uninformative BRCA1/2 result. However, few reported any detrimental emotional impact. The delivery of personalized polygenic breast cancer risk to high-risk women informed and modified their breast cancer risk perception with little emotional impact.
Collapse
|
11
|
Keenan KF, Finnie RM, Simpson WG, McKee L, Dean J, Miedzybrodzka Z. Parents' views of genetic testing and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia in children: a qualitative study. J Community Genet 2018; 10:129-141. [PMID: 29949065 PMCID: PMC6325044 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0373-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a serious inherited disorder, which greatly increases individuals’ risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in adult life. However, medical treatment and lifestyle adjustments can fully restore life expectancy. Whilst European guidance advises that where there is a known family mutation genetic testing is undertaken in early childhood, the majority of the at-risk population remain untested and undiagnosed. To date, only a small number of studies have explored parents’ and children’s experiences of testing and treatment for FH, and little is known about interactions between health professionals, parents, and children in clinic settings. In this study, in-depth interviews were undertaken with parents who had attended a genetics and/or lipid clinic for FH with their children (n = 17). A thematic analysis revealed four main themes: undertaking early prevention, postponing treatment, parental concerns, and the importance of the wider family context. The majority of parents supported genetic testing for FH in childhood. However, although some were very supportive of following early treatment recommendations, others expressed reluctance. Importantly, some parents were concerned that inappropriate information had been shared with their children and wished that more time had been given to discuss how, when, and what to tell in advance. Future research is needed to explore the long-term outcomes for children who undertake genetic testing and early treatment for FH and to trial interventions to improve the engagement, follow-up, and support of children who are at risk, or diagnosed, with this disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Forrest Keenan
- Epidemiology Group, University of Aberdeen, First Floor Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK. .,Medical Genetics Group, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | - Robert M Finnie
- Department of Medicine/Care of the Elderly, St. Johns Hospital, Howdon Road West, Livingston, UK.,Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - William G Simpson
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Lorna McKee
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Third Floor Health Sciences Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK
| | - John Dean
- Medical Genetics Group, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.,Department of Medical Genetics, Ashgrove House, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Zosia Miedzybrodzka
- Medical Genetics Group, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.,Department of Medical Genetics, Ashgrove House, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The first human genome project, completed in 2003, uncovered the genetic building blocks of humankind. Painstakingly cataloguing the basic constituents of our DNA ('genome sequencing') took ten years, over three billion dollars and was a multinational collaboration. Since then, our ability to sequence genomes has been finessed so much that by 2018 it is possible to explore the 20,000 or so human genes for under £1000, in a matter of days. Such testing offers clues to our past, present and future health, as well as information about how we respond to medications so that truly 'personalised medicine' is now moving closer to a reality. The impact of such a 'genomic era' is likely to have some level of impact on an increasingly large number of us, even if we are not directly using healthcare services ourselves. We explore how advancements in genetics are likely to be experienced by people, as patients, consumers and citizens; and urge policy makers to take stock of the pervasive nature of the technology as well as the human response to it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Roberts
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - Anna Middleton
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Connecting Science, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Falahee M, Simons G, Buckley CD, Hansson M, Stack RJ, Raza K. Patients' Perceptions of Their Relatives' Risk of Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis and of the Potential for Risk Communication, Prediction, and Modulation. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2017; 69:1558-1565. [DOI: 10.1002/acr.23179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christopher D. Buckley
- University of Birmingham, and Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust; Birmingham UK
| | | | - Rebecca J. Stack
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, and Trent University; Nottingham UK
| | - Karim Raza
- University of Birmingham, and Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust; Birmingham UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ladabaum U, Patel A, Mannalithara A, Sundaram V, Mitani A, Desai M. Predicting advanced neoplasia at colonoscopy in a diverse population with the National Cancer Institute colorectal cancer risk-assessment tool. Cancer 2016; 122:2663-70. [PMID: 27219715 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Revised: 04/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tailoring screening to colorectal cancer (CRC) risk could improve screening effectiveness. Most CRCs arise from advanced neoplasia (AN) that dwells for years. To date, no available colorectal neoplasia risk score has been validated externally in a diverse population. The authors explored whether the National Cancer Institute (NCI) CRC risk-assessment tool, which was developed to predict future CRC risk, could predict current AN prevalence in a diverse population, thereby allowing its use in risk stratification for screening. METHODS This was a prospective examination of the relation between predicted 10-year CRC risk and the prevalence of AN, defined as advanced or multiple (≥3 adenomatous, ≥5 serrated) adenomatous or sessile serrated polyps, in individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. RESULTS Among 509 screenees (50% women; median age, 58 years; 61% white, 5% black, 10% Hispanic, and 24% Asian), 58 (11%) had AN. The prevalence of AN increased progressively from 6% in the lowest risk-score quintile to 17% in the highest risk-score quintile (P = .002). Risk-score distributions in individuals with versus without AN differed significantly (median, 1.38 [0.90-1.87] vs 1.02 [0.62-1.57], respectively; P = .003), with substantial overlap. The discriminatory accuracy of the tool was modest, with areas under the curve of 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.69) overall, 0.59 (95% CI, 0.49-0.70) for women, and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.53-0.73) for men. The results did not change substantively when the analysis was restricted to adenomatous lesions or to screening procedures without any additional incidental indication. CONCLUSIONS The NCI CRC risk-assessment tool displays modest discriminatory accuracy in predicting AN at screening colonoscopy in a diverse population. This tool may aid shared decision-making in clinical practice. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2663-2670. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ashley Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Vandana Sundaram
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Aya Mitani
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Manisha Desai
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.,Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Geus E, Aalfs CM, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, Verdam MGE, de Haes HCJM, Smets EMA. Development of the Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI): Assessing Index Patients' Knowledge, Motivation and Self-Efficacy Regarding the Disclosure of Hereditary Cancer Risk Information to Relatives. Int J Behav Med 2016; 22:551-60. [PMID: 25515913 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-014-9455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the use of genetic services, counselees do not always share hereditary cancer information with at-risk relatives. Reasons for not informing relatives may be categorized as a lack of: knowledge, motivation, and/or self-efficacy. PURPOSE This study aims to develop and test the psychometric properties of the Informing Relatives Inventory, a battery of instruments that intend to measure counselees' knowledge, motivation, and self-efficacy regarding the disclosure of hereditary cancer risk information to at-risk relatives. METHOD Guided by the proposed conceptual framework, existing instruments were selected and new instruments were developed. We tested the instruments' acceptability, dimensionality, reliability, and criterion-related validity in consecutive index patients visiting the Clinical Genetics department with questions regarding hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer or colon cancer. RESULTS Data of 211 index patients were included (response rate = 62%). The Informing Relatives Inventory (IRI) assesses three barriers in disclosure representing seven domains. Instruments assessing index patients' (positive) motivation and self-efficacy were acceptable and reliable and suggested good criterion-related validity. Psychometric properties of instruments assessing index patients knowledge were disputable. These items were moderately accepted by index patients and the criterion-related validity was weaker. CONCLUSION This study presents a first conceptual framework and associated inventory (IRI) that improves insight into index patients' barriers regarding the disclosure of genetic cancer information to at-risk relatives. Instruments assessing (positive) motivation and self-efficacy proved to be reliable measurements. Measuring index patients knowledge appeared to be more challenging. Further research is necessary to ensure IRI's dimensionality and sensitivity to change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline de Geus
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lessons learned from family history in ocular genetics. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015. [DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000000192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
17
|
Esplen MJ, Wong J, Aronson M, Butler K, Rothenmund H, Semotiuk K, Madlensky L, Way C, Dicks E, Green J, Gallinger S. Long-term psychosocial and behavioral adjustment in individuals receiving genetic test results in Lynch syndrome. Clin Genet 2015; 87:525-32. [PMID: 25297893 PMCID: PMC4391982 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 09/23/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A cross-sectional study of 155 participants who underwent genetic testing for Lynch syndrome (LS) examined long-term psychosocial and behavioral outcomes. Participants completed standardized measures of perceived risk, psychosocial functioning, knowledge, and a questionnaire of screening activities. Participants were on average 47.3 years and had undergone testing a mean of 5.5 years prior. Eighty four (54%) tested positive for a LS mutation and 71 (46%) negative. For unaffected carriers, perceived lifetime risk of colorectal cancer was 68%, and surprisingly, 40% among those testing negative. Most individuals demonstrated normative levels of psychosocial functioning. However, 25% of those testing negative had moderate depressive symptoms, as measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies for Depression Scale, and 31% elevated state anxiety on the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Being female and a stronger escape - avoidant coping style were predictive of depressive symptoms. For state anxiety, similar patterns were observed. Quality of life and social support were significantly associated with lower anxiety. Carriers maintained higher knowledge compared to those testing negative, and were more engaged in screening. In summary, most individuals adapt to genetic test results over the long term and continue to engage in screening. A subgroup, including some non-carriers, may require added psychosocial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Esplen
- University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; de Souza Institute, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Underhill M, Berry D, Dalton E, Schienda J, Syngal S. Patient experiences living with pancreatic cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015. [PMID: 26029287 DOI: 10.1186/s13053 -015-0034-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer (PancCa) is recognized as a component of many well-described hereditary cancer syndromes. Minimal research has focused on patient needs and experiences living with this risk. PURPOSE To understand the meaning and experience of living with familial PancCa risk and to explore experiences related to screening and prevention of PancCa. METHODS Participants underwent semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Adults without PancCa and who met familial or hereditary risk criteria were eligible. Thematic analysis was completed on the transcripts in order to identify patterns, consistencies, and differences. Narrative review of existing literature related to women living with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk was completed to explore similarities and differences between published findings and our current findings. RESULTS Nineteen individuals (9 male, 10 female) participated. Major themes addressed participants' family experiences with PancCa and PancCa death and the associated grief from the experiences. Family experiences impacted how participants interpreted and approached their own cancer risk and participated in the cancer screening program. Participants wanted to control their cancer risk and sought information and resources to prevent PancCa or PancCa related death. Distress related to risk was not described as constant but occurred around salient time points. CONCLUSION & FUTURE IMPLICATIONS Study results begin to describe the lived experience of individuals with PancCa risk. Through this research we have uncovered important variables to further understand, measure, and intervene upon in future research. Distress related to risk was not described as ongoing, but occurred around specific and salient time points that brought risk to the forefront. Individuals with familial PancCa risk may have a unique experience compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes due to the high mortality of the disease and uncertainty related to prevention and early detection outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Emily Dalton
- Ambry Genetics, (previously Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Boston, MA USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Underhill M, Berry D, Dalton E, Schienda J, Syngal S. Patient experiences living with pancreatic cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2015; 13:13. [PMID: 26029287 PMCID: PMC4449523 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-015-0034-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2014] [Accepted: 05/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer (PancCa) is recognized as a component of many well-described hereditary cancer syndromes. Minimal research has focused on patient needs and experiences living with this risk. Purpose To understand the meaning and experience of living with familial PancCa risk and to explore experiences related to screening and prevention of PancCa. Methods Participants underwent semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Adults without PancCa and who met familial or hereditary risk criteria were eligible. Thematic analysis was completed on the transcripts in order to identify patterns, consistencies, and differences. Narrative review of existing literature related to women living with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk was completed to explore similarities and differences between published findings and our current findings. Results Nineteen individuals (9 male, 10 female) participated. Major themes addressed participants’ family experiences with PancCa and PancCa death and the associated grief from the experiences. Family experiences impacted how participants interpreted and approached their own cancer risk and participated in the cancer screening program. Participants wanted to control their cancer risk and sought information and resources to prevent PancCa or PancCa related death. Distress related to risk was not described as constant but occurred around salient time points. Conclusion & future implications Study results begin to describe the lived experience of individuals with PancCa risk. Through this research we have uncovered important variables to further understand, measure, and intervene upon in future research. Distress related to risk was not described as ongoing, but occurred around specific and salient time points that brought risk to the forefront. Individuals with familial PancCa risk may have a unique experience compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes due to the high mortality of the disease and uncertainty related to prevention and early detection outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donna Berry
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA
| | - Emily Dalton
- Ambry Genetics, (previously Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Boston, MA USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Heiniger L, Butow PN, Charles M, Price MA. Intuition versus cognition: a qualitative exploration of how women understand and manage their increased breast cancer risk. J Behav Med 2015; 38:727-39. [PMID: 25820809 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-015-9632-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Risk comprehension in individuals at increased familial risk of cancer is suboptimal and little is known about how risk is understood and managed by at-risk individuals who do not undergo genetic testing. We qualitatively studied these issues in 36 unaffected women from high-risk breast cancer families, including both women who had and had not undergone genetic testing. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and data analysis was guided by Grounded Theory. Risk comprehension and risk management were largely influenced by the individual's experience of coming from a high-risk family, with both tested and untested women relying heavily on their intuition. Although women's cognitive understanding of their risk appeared generally accurate, this objective risk information was considered of secondary value. The findings could be used to guide the development and delivery of information about risk and risk management to genetically tested and untested individuals at increased risk of hereditary cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Heiniger
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Phyllis N Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Margaret Charles
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Melanie A Price
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group (PoCoG), The University of Sydney, Level 6 North, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse (C39Z), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Manuel A, Brunger F. "Awakening to" a new meaning of being at-risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a grounded theory study. J Community Genet 2015; 6:167-75. [PMID: 25620752 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-015-0212-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Efforts of social scientists to understand how individuals living in a family at risk for a genetically linked condition make health care decisions, having brought to the forefront the contextual nature of risk perception. Using a grounded theory approach, this study examines the experiences of 29 individuals living in families at risk for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Attention is paid to how individuals (re)construct the meaning of being at risk in relation to the developing science of gene discovery. Findings highlight that individuals living in a family at risk for ARVC juxtapose existing scientific knowledge against experiential knowledge as they "awaken to" the fact that they or a family member are at risk. This process is pragmatic and fluid and contingent upon whether and how symptoms are aligned with the constructed image of the at-risk relative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April Manuel
- Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada,
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
McAllister M, Dearing A. Patient reported outcomes and patient empowerment in clinical genetics services. Clin Genet 2014; 88:114-21. [PMID: 25307491 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2014] [Revised: 10/06/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Evaluation of clinical genetics services (CGS), including genetic counseling and genetic testing, has been problematic. Patient mortality and morbidity are unlikely to be directly improved by interventions offered in CGS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are not routinely measured in CGS evaluation, but this may change as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) become a key part of how healthcare services are managed and funded across the world. However, there is no clear consensus about which PROMs are most useful for CGS evaluation. This review summarizes the published research on how PROs from CGS have been measured and how patients may benefit from using those services, with a focus on patient empowerment. Many patient benefits (PROs) identified repeatedly in the research literature can be re-interpreted within a patient empowerment framework. Other important PROs identified include family functioning, social functioning, altruism, sense of purpose, enabling development of future research and treatment/participating in research. Well-validated measures are available to capture (dimensions of) patient empowerment. Although generic measures of family functioning are available, suitable measures capturing social functioning, development of future treatments, and altruism were not identified in this review. Patient empowerment provides one useful approach to measuring PROs from CGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M McAllister
- Institute of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - A Dearing
- Institute of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cheung BY, Dar-Nimrod I, Gonsalkorale K. Am I My Genes? Perceived Genetic Etiology, Intrapersonal Processes, and Health. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS 2014. [DOI: 10.1111/spc3.12138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Making the Decision to Participate in Predictive Genetic Testing for Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:1045-55. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9733-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 05/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
25
|
Shiloh S, deHeer HD, Peleg S, Hensley Alford S, Skapinsky K, Roberts JS, Hadley DW. The impact of multiplex genetic testing on disease risk perceptions. Clin Genet 2014; 87:117-23. [PMID: 24720448 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2014] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This study assessed the effects of multiplex genetic testing on disease risk perceptions among 216 healthy adults. Participants, aged 25-40, were recruited through the Multiplex Initiative, which offered a genetic susceptibility test for eight common diseases. Participants completed baseline telephone and web-based surveys prior to making the testing decision. Three months after the receipt of mailed test results, participants completed a follow-up telephone survey. Risk perceptions for the eight diseases were measured at baseline and follow-up, along with beliefs about genetic causation of those diseases. The main results were: (i) mean risk perceptions were considerably stable from baseline to follow-up; (ii) the best predictors of follow-up risk perceptions were the corresponding baseline perceptions and family history; and (iii) within-individuals, most participants increased or decreased their risk perceptions for specific diseases in concordance with the number of risk markers they carry, their family history and their beliefs about genetic causality of diseases. In conclusion, participants presented a vigilant approach to the interpretation of genetic test results, which provides reassurance with regard to a potential inflation of risk perceptions in the population because of multiplex genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Shiloh
- School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Navarro de Souza A, Groleau D, Loiselle CG, Foulkes WD, Wong N. Cultural aspects of healthy BRCA carriers from two ethnocultural groups. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2014; 24:665-681. [PMID: 24692182 DOI: 10.1177/1049732314528756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
We explored the experiences of Ashkenazi Jewish and French Canadian women and meanings attributed to their hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk. We purposively sampled 40 BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutation carriers and conducted theoretically driven semistructured interviews. According to content analysis, participants from these two ethnocultural groups held divergent meanings associated with being a BRCA carrier and different views pertaining to the illness experience and risk awareness. All participants identified a genetic basis; however, the French Canadian women also expressed other causes. The French Canadian women reported not knowing other carriers in their social environment, whereas the Ashkenazi Jewish women emphasized a strong sense of community contributing to their ethnic risk awareness. Based on these findings, we suggest that French Canadian women could benefit from greater awareness of the HBOC genetic risk and that health care providers should consider ethnically related and individual-based experiences and meanings during counseling.
Collapse
|
27
|
Interdisciplinary Education for Genetic Counselors: Developing the Concept and Assessing the Need in Australasia. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:708-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-014-9723-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
28
|
Poduri A, Sheidley BR, Shostak S, Ottman R. Genetic testing in the epilepsies-developments and dilemmas. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10:293-9. [PMID: 24733164 PMCID: PMC4090104 DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2014.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
In the past two decades, the number of genes recognized to have a role in the epilepsies has dramatically increased. The availability of testing for epilepsy-related genes is potentially helpful for clarification of the diagnosis and prognosis, selection of optimal treatments, and provision of information for family planning. For some patients, identification of a specific genetic cause of their epilepsy has important personal value, even in the absence of clear clinical utility. The availability of genetic testing also raises new issues that have only begun to be considered. These issues include the growing importance of educating physicians about when and how to test patients, the need to ensure that affected individuals and their families can make informed choices about testing and receive support after receiving the results, and the question of what the positive and negative consequences of genetic testing will be for affected individuals, their family members, and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annapurna Poduri
- Epilepsy Genetics Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Beth Rosen Sheidley
- Epilepsy Genetics Program, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Sara Shostak
- Department of Sociology, Brandeis University, 415 South Street, Waltham, MA 02454, USA
| | - Ruth Ottman
- Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center and Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jeffers L, Morrison PJ, McCaughan E, Fitzsimons D. Maximising survival: the main concern of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer who undergo genetic testing for BRCA1/2. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2014; 18:411-8. [PMID: 24731853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2014.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Revised: 03/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Little is known about how women with hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer who test positive for a BRCA gene manage the impact of a positive test result on their everyday lives and in the longer term. This study defined the experience and needs of women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and a positive BRCA test over time. METHODS A grounded theory approach was taken using qualitative interviews (n = 49) and reflective diaries. Data collected from December 2006 until March 2010 was analysed using the constant comparative technique to trace the development of how women manage their concerns of inherited cancer. RESULTS A four stage substantive theory of maximising survival was generated that defines the experience of women and how they resolve their main concerns. The process of maximising survival begins prior to genetic testing in women from high risk families as they expect to get a cancer diagnosis at some time. Women with cancer felt they had experienced the worst with a cancer diagnosis and altruistically tested for the sake of their children but a positive test result temporarily shifted their focus to decision-making around their personal health needs. CONCLUSION This study adds to clinical practice through raising awareness and adding insights into how women cope with living with inherited cancer risk and the personal and familial ramifications that ensue from it. A clear multi-professional structured care pathway for women from genetic testing result disclosure to undergoing risk-reducing surgery and/or surveillance should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Jeffers
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK.
| | - Patrick J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Department of Genetics, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| | - Eilis McCaughan
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK
| | - Donna Fitzsimons
- Institute of Nursing Research, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, UK; Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Balancing Life with an Increased Risk of Cancer: Lived Experiences in Healthy Individuals with Lynch Syndrome. J Genet Couns 2014; 23:778-84. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9682-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2013] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
31
|
Lautenbach DM, Christensen KD, Sparks JA, Green RC. Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2013; 14:491-513. [PMID: 24003856 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-092010-110722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Communicating genetic risk information in ways that maximize understanding and promote health is increasingly important given the rapidly expanding availability and capabilities of genomic technologies. A well-developed literature on risk communication in general provides guidance for best practices, including presentation of information in multiple formats, attention to framing effects, use of graphics, sensitivity to the way numbers are presented, parsimony of information, attentiveness to emotions, and interactivity as part of the communication process. Challenges to communicating genetic risk information include deciding how best to tailor it, streamlining the process, deciding what information to disclose, accepting that communications may have limited influence, and understanding the impact of context. Meeting these challenges has great potential for empowering individuals to adopt healthier lifestyles and improve public health, but will require multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration.
Collapse
|
32
|
Petersen HV, Ladelund S, Carlsson C, Nilbert M. Sense of coherence and self-concept in Lynch syndrome. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2013; 11:7. [PMID: 23830140 PMCID: PMC3707857 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-11-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2012] [Accepted: 06/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Most individuals who learn about hereditary cancer manage well, but identification of subgroups who find this knowledge burdening would allow psychosocial intervention. The objective of the study was to assess sense of coherence (SOC) in individuals with Lynch syndrome with comparison to a general population and correlation to self-concept. Methods A total of 345 individuals with Lynch syndrome completed the 13-item SOC scale and the 20-item Lynch syndrome self-concept scale. SOC scores were compared to a general Danish population and were correlated to self-concept estimates in individuals with Lynch syndrome. Characteristics of subgroups with adverse scores were described. Results Individuals with Lynch syndrome reported SOC scores similar to the general population. SOC and self-concept correlated well with a correlation coefficient of −0.51. Subsets with convergent and divergent scores, which may reflect different effects from knowledge about hereditary cancer, were identified. Conclusion Individuals with Lynch syndrome report SOC scores similar to the general population. SOC and self-concept correlate well but allow identification of subset who report adverse outcome and may be relevant for targeted intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle Vendel Petersen
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mand C, Gillam L, Duncan RE, Delatycki MB. “It was the missing piece”: adolescent experiences of predictive genetic testing for adult-onset conditions. Genet Med 2013; 15:643-9. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2012] [Accepted: 01/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
34
|
Family Communication Following BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing: A Close Look at the Process. J Genet Couns 2012; 22:323-35. [DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9559-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2012] [Accepted: 11/29/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
35
|
Mendes Á, Sousa L. Families' experience of oncogenetic counselling: accounts from a heterogeneous hereditary cancer risk population. Fam Cancer 2012; 11:291-306. [PMID: 22367452 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-012-9514-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
This paper reports the results of semi-structured family interviews conducted with a purposive sample of nine families (comprising 50 individuals) involved in cancer genetic counselling at a Portuguese public hospital. Qualitative analysis resulted in thematic categories illustrating: (1) how families go through cancer genetic counselling (eliciting risk awareness, the motivators, risk management, the psychosocial context of familial engagement in genetic counselling, and the familial pathways of cancer risk tracking); and (2) how families incorporate genetic risk into family life (strategies for family resilience, and the meanings and values that permeate the experience). Families have recognised the value of genetic counselling in enabling participants to take measures to confront disease risk; however, the experience was dominated by distressing feelings. A set of ethical-relational principles guided the experience. Familial experiences on genetic counselling and tracking of cancer susceptibility encompass a sense of trajectory that takes the form of an historical and intergenerational narrative process, linking past, present and possible futures. Such process implies an ongoing set of individual and interactional experiences taking place over time. Specific changes associated with the illness timeline and with individual and family developmental lifespan transitions are thus acknowledged. These results may help genetics healthcare practitioners understand how families perceive, respond to and accommodate cancer risk counselling, and thus illuminate family-oriented tenets for planning and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Mendes
- Health, Family and Community Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, University Campus of Santiago, 3810-093, Aveiro, Portugal.
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hawkins NA, McCarty F, Peipins LA, Rodriguez JL. Measuring the degree of closeness to the cancer experience: development and initial validation of the CONNection to the Experience of Cancer Scale (CONNECS). PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 89:292-9. [PMID: 22940373 PMCID: PMC6334758 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2012] [Revised: 07/19/2012] [Accepted: 08/09/2012] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development and psychometric testing of items measuring connection to the cancer experience through a close friend or relative. METHODS Ten items assess four aspects of connection to cancer: emotional and cognitive involvement, kind and amount of shared experience, perceived similarity to the affected person, and negative change witnessed. Interviews were conducted with 2200 women close to someone with cancer. The sample was split into two samples for exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Sample 1 (n=1342) was used to examine the underlying structure of the items. Sample 2 (n=858) was used for CFA. Internal consistency and reliability analysis were also conducted. RESULTS Three factors with moderate correlation were extracted: general closeness, resemblance, and cognitive processing. Results from the CFA analysis confirmed a good fit of the three-factor model (Bentler-Bonett NIF=0.973, Bentler-Bonett NNFI=0.975, RMSEA=0.040 and CFI=0.984) and all path coefficients were statistically significant. CONCLUSION Findings provide preliminary evidence for the reliability and construct validity of the CONNECS scale in measuring individuals' connection to the cancer experience through a close friend or relative. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS CONNECS may be a useful tool for examining the impact of the cancer experience on risk perceptions, cancer worry, and medical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki A Hawkins
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
James AS, Chisholm P, Wolin KY, Baxter M, Kaphingst K, Davidson NO. Screening and Health Behaviors among Persons Diagnosed with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis and Their Relatives. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012; 2012:506410. [PMID: 22899922 PMCID: PMC3414059 DOI: 10.1155/2012/506410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2012] [Revised: 06/08/2012] [Accepted: 06/19/2012] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) is a rare autosomal dominantly inherited colorectal cancer syndrome. Individuals with FAP often undergo colectomy and are recommended to follow several surveillance protocols. Biological relatives of persons with FAP may also be at risk and thus should undergo genetic counseling. Screening adherence, genetic testing, and other health behaviors among individuals with FAP and their relatives are not well characterized. We conducted a cross-sectional self-report survey with individuals who have FAP (n = 35) and their biological relatives (n = 15). Respondents were recruited through a cancer center registry for inherited colon cancers. Most relatives had undergone colon cancer screening; 40% had undergone genetic testing. One fifth of respondents with FAP had not undergone an upper endoscopy, contrary to usual recommendations. Cigarette smoking rates were above average and were higher among FAP respondents. Use of vitamin supplements was fairly common, more so among those with FAP. Although most people had been screened, there are areas for improvement, notably for upper endoscopy among individuals with FAP and genetic testing among family members. Several other health-risk behaviors and health concerns other than FAP were identified. Further research into factors contributing to screening rates and other health behaviors in this high-risk population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee S. James
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 So. Euclid Avenue, P.O. Box 8100, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Phillip Chisholm
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, 4950 Children's place St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Kathleen Y. Wolin
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 So. Euclid Avenue, P.O. Box 8100, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Melanie Baxter
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 So. Euclid Avenue, P.O. Box 8100, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Kimberly Kaphingst
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 So. Euclid Avenue, P.O. Box 8100, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Nicholas O. Davidson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in Saint Louis, 660 So. Euclid Avenue, P.O. Box 8124, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bartuma K, Nilbert M, Carlsson C. Family perspectives in lynch syndrome becoming a family at risk, patterns of communication and influence on relations. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2012; 10:6. [PMID: 22632157 PMCID: PMC3418549 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-10-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2012] [Accepted: 05/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A growing number of individuals are diagnosed with hereditary cancer. Though increased levels of anxiety and depression have been demonstrated around the time of genetic counselling, most individuals handle life at increased risk well. Data have, however, been collected on individual basis, which led us to focus on family perspectives of hereditary cancer. Methods Lynch syndrome represents a major type of hereditary colorectal and gynaecological cancer. We preformed open-ended interviews with 27 informants from 9 Lynch syndrome families. Inductive content analysis revealed three major themes: transition to a risk family, patterns of communication and influence on family relations and individual roles. Results Family members described how learning about Lynch syndrome shifted focus from daily issues to concerns about cancer. Changes in communication related to difficulties in talking to children about heredity and informing new family members and distant relatives about an increased risk of cancer. Influence on relations was exemplified by family members taking on different roles, e.g. females often being responsible for coordinating information about heredity and providing support. Families in which members had experienced cancer at young age typically informed children soon after learning about heredity and at young age, whereas families with experience of cancer at higher age postponed information and thereby also genetic counselling. Conclusions Three major family perspectives are described in Lynch syndrome families; becoming a risk family, patterns of communication and influence on family relations. Since these issues are central, our findings suggests that such family perspectives should be considered during genetic counselling in order to contribute to information spread, help family members cope with the increased risk, and motivate family members at risk to undergo surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarina Bartuma
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure. Genet Med 2012; 13:800-11. [PMID: 21885922 DOI: 10.1097/gim.0b013e31821a36f9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic counseling may help counselees understand their genetic risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. However, many studies have shown that their perception of their risks is inaccurate. Information-oriented variables often predicted the level of accuracy, focusing on specific processes of receiving and processing risks. We examined counselee-oriented predictors about how counselees embed cancer risks in their lives. These predictors reflect the personal meaning of genetic risks and are expected to explain/mediate the impact of genetic counseling on risk-perception-accuracy. METHOD We analyzed 248 questionnaires of a prospective study, filled in by probands with breast/ovarian cancer and pathogenic mutations, unclassified variants, or uninformative results (n = 30, 16, and 202, respectively). Mediation regression analyses were performed to examine whether counselee predictors mediated/explained the influence of information predictors on the accuracy. Information-oriented predictors regarded presentation format, communicated information, question format, education, pedigree information, cancer experience, and cognitive processes/heuristics. Counselee-oriented predictors regarded their self/personality, life/existence, and need for certainty about DNA test result, heredity, and cancer. RESULTS Both information-oriented and counselee-oriented variables significantly predicted the accuracy of the counselees' risk perception, with moderate to large effect sizes. Counselee-oriented variables completely mediated/explained the effects of information-oriented variables on the accuracy. DISCUSSION Counselees seemed to transform objective cancer risks into personally relevant information. Only through this personal meaning of genetic information, information-oriented processes seemed to cause inaccurate perceptions. Genetic counselors are suggested to focus communication on these personal processes.
Collapse
|
40
|
Vos J, Oosterwijk JC, Gomez-Garcia E, Menko FH, Collee MJ, van Asperen CJ, Jansen AM, Stiggelbout AM, Tibben A. Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: the counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 86:239-251. [PMID: 21684708 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2010] [Revised: 03/11/2011] [Accepted: 04/08/2011] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Previous studies suggest that learning a DNA-test-result has no direct impact on the medical-decisions and psychological well-being of counselees. Their perception, especially their recollections and interpretations of their cancer-risks and heredity, predict and/or mediate this impact. These studies were criticized for their small range of predictors, mediators, outcomes and contextual factors. We studied the short-term impact of DNA-testing with an extended model. METHODS Three months after disclosure of BRCA1/2-test-results, we sent counselees a questionnaire about their perception, medical and psychological outcomes, and medical, familial and psychological contexts. 248 affected women participated; 30 had received pathogenic-mutations, 16 unclassified-variants and 202 uninformative-results. RESULTS The actually communicated genetic-information and the contextual variables predicted the counselees' perception, but did not directly predict any outcomes. The counselees' perception predicted and/or completely mediated the counselees' medical intentions and behavior, physical and psychological life-changes, stigma, mastery, negativity and cancer-worries. Short-term distress was related to the perception not only of their own risks, but also of their relatives' risks and heredity-likelihood. Effect sizes were medium to large. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The outcomes of DNA-testing were better predicted by the counselees' perception than by the actually given genetic-information. We recommend genetic-counselors to have tailored, interactive dialogues about the counselees' perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Vos
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Watkins KE, Way CY, Fiander JJ, Meadus RJ, Esplen MJ, Green JS, Ludlow VC, Etchegary HA, Parfrey PS. Lynch syndrome: barriers to and facilitators of screening and disease management. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2011; 9:8. [PMID: 21899746 PMCID: PMC3180430 DOI: 10.1186/1897-4287-9-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2010] [Accepted: 09/07/2011] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer with confirmed carriers at high risk for colorectal (CRC) and extracolonic cancers. The purpose of the current study was to develop a greater understanding of the factors influencing decisions about disease management post-genetic testing. Methods The study used a grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis as part of a multiphase project examining the psychosocial and behavioral impact of predictive DNA testing for Lynch syndrome. Individual and small group interviews were conducted with individuals from 10 families with the MSH2 intron 5 splice site mutation or exon 8 deletion. The data from confirmed carriers (n = 23) were subjected to re-analysis to identify key barriers to and/or facilitators of screening and disease management. Results Thematic analysis identified personal, health care provider and health care system factors as dominant barriers to and/or facilitators of managing Lynch syndrome. Person-centered factors reflect risk perceptions and decision-making, and enduring screening/disease management. The perceived knowledge and clinical management skills of health care providers also influenced participation in recommended protocols. The health care system barriers/facilitators are defined in terms of continuity of care and coordination of services among providers. Conclusions Individuals with Lynch syndrome often encounter multiple barriers to and facilitators of disease management that go beyond the individual to the provider and health care system levels. The current organization and implementation of health care services are inadequate. A coordinated system of local services capable of providing integrated, efficient health care and follow-up, populated by providers with knowledge of hereditary cancer, is necessary to maintain optimal health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy E Watkins
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St, John's, NL, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shostak S, Zarhin D, Ottman R. What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members. Soc Sci Med 2011; 73:645-54. [PMID: 21831495 PMCID: PMC3163050 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2010] [Revised: 06/20/2011] [Accepted: 06/23/2011] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Substantial progress has been made in identifying genes that raise risk for epilepsy, and genetic testing for some of these genes is increasingly being used in clinical practice. However, almost no empirical data are available from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members about the impact of genetic information and potential benefits and harms of genetic testing. To address this gap we conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 40 individuals (22 with epilepsy, 18 unaffected) in the USA from families containing multiple affected individuals who had participated in epilepsy genetics research. The interviews were coded and analyzed using the principles of grounded theory. Several major themes emerged from these interviews. Participants expressed "personal theories of inheritance" that emphasized commonalities among relatives and the idea that disease risk is most shared by family members who share physical or personality traits. Most participants said they would have genetic testing if it were offered. They cited many potential benefits, including learning what caused epilepsy in their family, being better able to care and advocate for children at risk, reducing guilt and blame, providing an increased sense of control, and relieving anxiety in unaffected individuals who test negative. The influence of genetic information on reproduction was a particularly salient theme. Although respondents believed genetic testing would be useful for informing their reproductive choices, they also expressed fear that it could lead to external pressures to modify these choices. Other concerns about the potential negative impact of genetic information included increased blame and guilt, increased stigma and discrimination in employment and insurance, self-imposed limitations on life goals, and alterations in fundamental conceptions of "what epilepsy is." Consideration of the perspectives of people with epilepsy and their family members is critical to understanding the implications of contemporary epilepsy genetic research and testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Shostak
- Brandeis University, Department of Sociology, MS 071, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Persson E, Lindholm E, Berndtsson I, Lundstam U, Hultén L, Carlsson E. Experiences of living with increased risk of developing colorectal and gynaecological cancer in individuals with no identified gene mutation. Scand J Caring Sci 2011; 26:20-7. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00898.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
44
|
Lim JNW, Hewison J, Chu CE, Al-Habsi H. Factors influencing consultation to discuss family history of cancer by asymptomatic patients in primary care. J Community Genet 2011; 2:19-26. [PMID: 22109720 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-011-0034-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2010] [Accepted: 01/11/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient self-initiated consultations to discuss family history of cancer in primary care and the factors leading to these consultations have not been investigated. Seventy-one out of 150 asymptomatic patients with a family history of cancer at the Yorkshire Cancer Genetics Service participated in this study. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered. The results show that (1) family cancer events, doctors' advice and reaching the age of cancer-affected relatives were more salient in raising awareness of the added cancer risk due to family history than media and publicity, and knowledge of the genetics services; (2) knowledge of family medical history and its clinical value is not easy to ascertain; (3) the inter-relationships with other causal beliefs are of interest and could provide insights to understand the factors motivating patients to discuss family history or cancer risk; (4) the belief that 'cancer runs in the family' or is 'a family thing' may not be sufficient to heighten perceived cancer risk and motivate patients to seek medical advice; and (5) understanding of the medical concept and clinical value of family history is poor even in this group of patients who initiated the GP consultations. In conclusion, because most primary care practitioners are likely to rely on patient initiated discussion to identify individuals at an increased risk of cancer because of their family history, these findings are therefore important to help doctors and health providers understand the reasons influencing asymptomatic patients to self-refer themselves in primary care and discuss cancer risk in order to provide appropriate care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer N W Lim
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Vos J, Oosterwijk JC, Gómez-García E, Menko FH, Jansen AM, Stoel RD, van Asperen CJ, Tibben A, Stiggelbout AM. Perceiving cancer-risks and heredity-likelihood in genetic-counseling: how counselees recall and interpret BRCA 1/2-test results. Clin Genet 2010; 79:207-18. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2010.01581.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
46
|
Ersig AL, Ayres L, Hadley DW, Koehly LM. Explanations of risk in families without identified mutations for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. J Nurs Scholarsh 2010; 42:139-46. [PMID: 20618598 DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01342.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic testing for hereditary forms of cancer does not always identify a causative mutation. Little is known about personal or family response to these indeterminate results when a hereditary form of cancer is suspected. This study explored thoughts about and responses to risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) when a family member has received indeterminate genetic test results. DESIGN In this qualitative study, data were gathered from index cases who received indeterminate genetic test results through a longitudinal study offering genetic counseling and testing for HNPCC. First-degree relatives of these indeterminate index cases were also invited to participate in the qualitative interview. METHODS Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with index cases and their at-risk first-degree relatives. Data were analyzed using the within- and across-case method. FINDINGS The across-case analysis led to the development of the Awareness and Surveillance Trajectory, which describes individual interpretations of and responses to risk, based on personal and family history. Explanations of risk addressed the meaning of cancer in the family and provided context for individual interpretations. They were identified using within-case analysis and organized into a typology: innate, exceptional, idiosyncratic, and undeveloped explanations. CONCLUSIONS Members of families without identified HNPCC mutations vary in their explanations for, interpretations of, and responses to indeterminate genetic test results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Explanations of family risk and interpretations of individual risk offer healthcare providers valuable information. In combination with the Awareness and Surveillance Trajectory, assessment of these beliefs can facilitate development of individualized recommendations and strategies for possible preventive actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne L Ersig
- College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Palmquist AEL, Koehly LM, Peterson SK, Shegog M, Vernon SW, Gritz ER. "The cancer bond": exploring the formation of cancer risk perception in families with Lynch syndrome. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:473-86. [PMID: 20401527 PMCID: PMC2940987 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-010-9299-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2009] [Accepted: 03/23/2010] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the social context of hereditary cancer risk perception in three families, an African-American family, a Mexican-American family, and a Caucasian family, each with Lynch Syndrome documented by a mismatch repair gene mutation. Communication network assessments measured family communication about cancer experiences and genetic testing information among a total of 26 participants. Participant narratives were evaluated to gain insight into how family cancer experiences and genetic testing information have shaped perceptions of cancer risk. Analysis of communication networks indicated that some families discussed cancer experiences to a greater extent than genetic testing information, and vice-versa. Interviews elucidated that sharing both types of health information led participants to conceptualize linkages among a strong family history of cancer, genetic testing information, and cancer prevention strategies. Understanding how different types of family communication influence the formation of perceived hereditary disease risk may enhance efforts to tailor genetic counseling services for families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aunchalee E L Palmquist
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lipworth WL, Davey HM, Carter SM, Hooker C, Hu W. Beliefs and beyond: what can we learn from qualitative studies of lay people's understandings of cancer risk? Health Expect 2010; 13:113-24. [PMID: 20536535 DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00601.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians and public health professionals are centrally concerned with mediating risk. However, people often resist the risk-related information that is communicated to them by experts, or have their own models of risk that conflict with expert views. Quantitative studies have clearly demonstrated the importance of health beliefs and various cognitive and emotional processes in shaping risk perception. More recently, a growing body of qualitative research has emerged, exploring lay conceptualizations, experiences and constructions of cancer risk. To date, this literature has not been synthesized. OBJECTIVE We report the findings of a synthesis of qualitative literature regarding the ways in which lay people construct and experience cancer risk. DESIGN We identified 87 articles and used the method of 'thematic synthesis' to identify and interpret key concepts from existing studies. RESULTS Eight analytic categories were developed: (i) perceptions of risk factors; (ii) process of risk perception; (iii) seeking control and taking responsibility (motivational factors); (iv) experiencing cancer directly; (v) constructing risk temporally; (vi) embodying risk; (vii) identifying with risk; and (viii) constructing risk in a social context. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative enquiry can provide us with a rich and nuanced picture of the ways in which people understand, experience and construct risk and how being 'at risk' is managed, and can assist us in our communication with both individual patients and populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy L Lipworth
- Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, The University of Sydney NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gale T, Pasalodos-Sanchez S, Kerzin-Storrar L, Hall G, MacLeod R. Explaining Mendelian inheritance in genetic consultations: an IPR study of counselor and counselee experiences. J Genet Couns 2010; 19:55-67. [PMID: 20049518 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9263-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2009] [Accepted: 09/25/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The explanation of Mendelian inheritance is a key component of most genetic counselling consultations, yet no evidence base exists for this area of practice. This qualitative study used Interpersonal Process Recall (IPR) to explore how information about X-linked inheritance is provided and received in genetic counseling. Twelve consultations involving two senior genetic counselors and 21 counselees were videotaped. Section(s) of videotape featuring the explanation were subsequently played back separately to both counselees and counselors and their responses and reflections recorded. All interviews were fully transcribed and analysed using the constant comparison method. A personalized diagram, drawn "live" by the counselor during the consultation was recalled by counselees as being central to their understanding of the "bottom line". This helped bridge the gap between scientific information and their family experience and did not appear to require a baseline understanding of genetic concepts such as genes or chromosomes. Counselors reflected on the diagram's positive impact on the way they sequenced, paced and tailored the explanation. A positive counselor-counselee relationship was vital even during this educative exchange: for counselees to feel at ease discussing complex genetic information and to help gauge counselee understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodora Gale
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Riedl A, Maass J, Fliege H, Stengel A, Schmidtmann M, Klapp BF, Mönnikes H. Subjective theories of illness and clinical and psychological outcomes in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. J Psychosom Res 2009; 67:449-55. [PMID: 19837208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2008] [Revised: 02/09/2009] [Accepted: 02/10/2009] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients' ideas about the nature, cause, and treatment of their illnesses are part of the complex process of coping with illness. To date, limited research on subjective theories of illness in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has been performed. The aim of the study was to investigate patients' subjective theories of illness and how these are related to clinical and psychological outcome criteria, in particular IBS symptom severity and quality of life. METHODS Eighty-eight patients with IBS, as defined by Rome III criteria, were administered a battery of questionnaires to collect the following data: sociodemographic variables, subjective theories of illness (Subjektive Krankheitstheorien, Cause Questionnaire), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), depression (Beck Depression Inventory), quality of life (SF-12), and IBS symptoms (Questionnaire for Gastrointestinal Symptoms). RESULTS Almost all patients reported theories of illness reflecting their subjective causal assumptions. The most frequently mentioned causal factors were physical illness, intrapsychic factors, and stress. Patients with mainly somatic attributions had higher IBS symptoms scores (P<.05) and reduced physical quality of life. Intrapsychic attributions were associated with reduced mental quality of life and enhanced physical quality of life (P<.01). All correlations were independent of gender, age, and irritable bowel subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Subjective theories of illness can have significant implications for IBS symptom severity, as well as for physical and mental quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Riedl
- Division of Hepatology, Gastroenterology, and Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|