Review of select transplant subpopulations at high risk of failure from standard immunosuppressive therapy

Effects of tacrolimus intrapatient variability and CYP3A5 polymorphism on the outcomes of pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The intrapatient variability (IPV) of tacrolimus (Tac) is associated with the long-term outcome of kidney transplantation. The CYP3A single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) may affect the IPV of Tac. We investigated the impact of IPV and genetic polymorphism in pediatric patients who received kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 202 pediatric renal transplant recipients from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The IPV was calculated between 6 and 12 months after surgery. Among these patients, CYP3A5 polymorphism was analyzed in 67 patients.

RESULTS

The group with high IPV had a significantly higher rate of de novo donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSA) development (35.7% vs. 16.7%, p = .003). The high IPV group also had a higher incidence of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR; p < .001). The high IPV had no significant influence on Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, and BK virus viremia but was associated with the incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (p = .003). Overall, the graft survival rate was inferior in the high IPV group (p < .001). The CYP3A5 SNPs did not significantly affect the IPV of Tac. In the CYP3A5 expressor group, however, the IPV was significantly associated with the TCMR-free survival rate (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

The IPV of Tac had a significant impact on dnDSA development, occurrence of acute TCMR, and graft failure in pediatric patients who received renal transplantation. CYP3A5 expressors with high IPV of Tac showed worse outcomes, while the CYP3A5 polymorphism had no impact on IPV of Tac.

Treatment optimization of maintenance immunosuppressive agents in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Introduction: Graft survival in pediatric kidney transplant patients has increased significantly within the last three decades, correlating with the discovery and utilization of new immunosuppressants as well as improvements in patient care. Despite these developments in graft survival for patients, there is still improvement needed, particularly in long-term care in pediatric patients receiving grafts from deceased donor patients. Maintenance immunosuppressive therapies have narrow therapeutic indices and are associated with high inter-individual and intra-individual variability.Areas covered: In this review, we examine the impact of pharmacokinetic variability on renal transplantation and its association with age, genetic polymorphisms, drug-drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, renal insufficiency, route of administration, and branded versus generic drug formulation. Pharmacodynamics are outlined in terms of the mechanism of action for each immunosuppressant, potential adverse effects, and the utility of pharmacodynamic biomarkers.Expert opinion: Acquiring abetter quantitative understanding of immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic components should help clinicians implement treatment regimens to maintain the balance between therapeutic efficacy and drug-related toxicity.

Tacrolimus interaction with nafcillin resulting in significant decreases in tacrolimus concentrations: A case report

Tacrolimus (TAC) is subject to many drug interactions as a result of its metabolism primarily via CYP450 isoenzyme 3A4. Numerous case reports of TAC and CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors have been described including antimicrobials, calcium channel antagonists, and antiepileptic drugs. We present the case of a 13-year-old patient with cystic fibrosis and a history of liver transplantation, where subtherapeutic TAC concentrations were suspected to be a result of concomitant TAC and nafcillin (NAF) therapy. The observed drug interaction occurred on two separate hospital admissions, during both of which the patient exhibited therapeutic TAC concentrations prior to exposure to NAF, a CYP3A4 inducer. Upon discontinuation of NAF, TAC concentrations recovered in both instances. This case represents a drug-drug interaction between TAC and NAF that has not previously been reported to our knowledge. Despite the lack of existing reports of interaction between these two agents, this case highlights the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring and assessing for any potential drug-drug or drug-food interactions in patients receiving TAC therapy.

Future direction of immunosuppression in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immunosuppression regimens have helped improve rejection episodes following lung transplantation, but long-term outcomes are still not comparable with cardiac, hepatic, or renal transplantation. This review summarizes the immunobiology that contributes to rejection events and future opportunities in outcomes on the basis of providing optimized delivery of the immunosuppression based on immune-monitoring techniques, taking into account individual patient pharmacokinetics and phenotypic variance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Drug toxicities, narrow therapeutic drug monitoring windows, and current immunoassays currently do not assist in detecting the global degree of immunosuppression. The currently available randomized control trials for induction therapy or maintenance therapies do not provide additional benefits compared with previously reported retrospective trials. To push beyond the current barriers, transplant teams are focusing on the role of pharmacokinetics, assessing phenotypic variable to potentially modify to quadruple therapy and using extracorporeal photopheresis.

SUMMARY

Conventional practice for the choices of immunosuppression is being evaluated on the basis of randomized control trials as opposed to retrospective studies or single-center trials. The future direction of immunosuppression will be continued by dynamic processes taking into consideration measures to improve tolerance, reducing treatment burden, and providing the best level of evidence while accounting for rejection, infections, renal function, and other comorbidities.

Pharmacokinetic study of conversion from tacrolimus twice-daily to tacrolimus once-daily in stable lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Tacrolimus twice-daily (TAC BID) is widely used in lung transplantation (LT), but there are little data on the use of tacrolimus once-daily (TAC QD) in this population. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of TAC BID and TAC QD in stable, adult LT patients.

METHODS

Phase II, open-label, single-center, single-arm, prospective pilot PK study. Nineteen LT recipients with more than 6 months of postoperative follow-up and on TAC BID-based therapy were converted to TAC QD on a 1:1 (mg/mg) basis. Patients had been stable during the previous 3 months, and cystic fibrosis patients were excluded. One 24-hr PK profile was obtained on day -14 while patients were under TAC BID. A second PK profile was obtained 14 to 28 days after switching (day 0) to the same dose of TAC QD. Pre- and post-switch 24-hr PK profiles were compared.

RESULTS

Mean AUC0-24 hr was 279.8 ng mL/hr for TAC BID and 278.7 ng mL/hr for TAC QD (P=0.92). AUC0-12 hr of TAC BID was higher than the AUC12-24 hr. There was a good correlation between AUC0-24 hr and C24 for both QD (r=0.96) and BID (r=0.94) formulations. There were no differences in the adverse events occurring with the two formulations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus bioavailability in steady state is similar in BID and QD formulations after conversion in stable LT recipients, excluding those with cystic fibrosis. Thus, our results indicate TAC BID can be safely switched to the more convenient QD formulation in this population.

Pediatric renal transplantation: results and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

As renal transplantation may increase survival rates and improve quality of life for children with end-stage renal disease, we investigated the long-term outcomes and prognostic factors of pediatric renal transplantation.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted to review 25 pediatric renal transplantations, either from live or deceased donors, in our hospital from 1995 to 2008. The cumulative graft survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log rank tests were employed to identify categorical prognostic factors for graft survival of the pediatric renal transplantations, and Cox regression analysis for numeric factors.

RESULTS

The mean age of our study subjects was 11.63±3.76 years, and the mean follow-up period was 49.24±33.72 months. The 12-month and 36-month graft survival rates were 92% and 82.14%, respectively. The rejection-free survival rates were 88% and 72.88% in the first and third years, respectively. All of the patients were alive during the follow-up period. Acute rejection (p=0.0175) and male sex (p=0.0384) were found to be significant factors for graft survival.

CONCLUSION

For pediatric patients, we found that renal transplantation is now a safe and effective surgical procedure for children with end-stage renal disease. Acute rejection and male gender were identified as prognostic factors for poor graft survival.

Generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: a Canadian perspective

The introduction of generic immunosuppressant medications may present an opportunity for cost savings in solid organ transplantation if equivalent clinical outcomes to the branded counterparts can be achieved. An interprofessional working group of the Canadian Society of Transplantation was established to develop recommendations on the use of generic immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) based on a review of the available data. Under current Health Canada licensing requirements, a demonstration of bioequivalence with the branded formulation in healthy volunteers allows for bridging of clinical data. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus are designated as "critical dose drugs" and are held to stricter criteria. However, whether this provides sufficient guarantee of therapeutic equivalence in SOTR remains controversial, and failure to maintain an appropriate balance of immunosuppression may have serious consequences, including rejection, graft loss, and death. Published evidence supporting therapeutic equivalence of generic formulations in SOTR is lacking. Moreover, in the setting of multiple generic formulations the potential for uncontrolled product switching is a major concern, since generic preparations are not required to demonstrate bioequivalence with each other. Although close monitoring is recommended with any change in formulation, drug product switches are likely to occur without prescriber knowledge and may pose a significant patient safety risk. The advent of generic immunosuppression will require new practices including more frequent therapeutic drug and clinical monitoring, and increased patient education. The additional workload placed on transplant centers without additional funding will create challenges and could ultimately jeopardize patient outcomes. Until more robust clinical data are available and adequate regulatory safeguards are instituted, caution in the use of generic immunosuppressive drugs in solid organ transplantation is warranted.

The importance of different immunosuppressive regimens in the development of posttransplant diabetes mellitus

Solid-organ transplantation is the optimal long-term treatment for most patients with end-stage organ failure. After solid-organ transplantation, short-term graft survival significantly improved (1). However, due to chronic allograft nephropathy and death with functioning graft, long-term survival has not prolonged remarkably (2). Posttransplant immunosuppressive medications consist of one of the calcineurin inhibitors in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine (Aza) and steroids. All of them have different adverse effects, among which posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) events and infections causing the death of many transplant patients and it may directly contribute to graft failure (3). According to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (4), diabetes mellitus (DM) is defined by symptoms of diabetes (polyuria and polydipsia and weight loss) plus casual plasma glucose concentration ≥ 11.1 mmol/L or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L or 2-h plasma glucose level ≥ 11.1 mmol/L following oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This metabolic disorder occurring as a complication of organ transplantation has been recognized for many years. PTDM, which is a combination of decreased insulin secretion and increased insulin resistance, develops in 4.9/15.9% of liver transplant patients, in 4.7/11.5% of kidney recipients, and in 15/17.5% of heart and lung transplants [cyclosporine A (CyA)/tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen, respectively] (5). Risk factors of PTDM can be divided into non-modifiable and modifiable ones (6), among which the most prominent is the immunosuppressive therapy being responsible for 74% of PTDM development (7). Emphasizing the importance of the PTDM, numerous studies have determined the long-term outcome. On the basis of these studies, graft and patient survival is tendentiously (8) or significantly (9, 10) decreased for those developing PTDM.

Meta-analysis of medical regimen adherence outcomes in pediatric solid organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

Adherence to the medical regimen after pediatric organ transplantation is important for maximizing good clinical outcomes. However, the literature provides inconsistent evidence regarding prevalence and risk factors for nonadherence posttransplant.

METHODS

A total of 61 studies (30 kidney, 18 liver, 8 heart, 2 lung/heart-lung, and 3 with mixed recipient samples) were included in a meta-analysis. Average rates of nonadherence to six areas of the regimen, and correlations of potential risk factors with nonadherence, were calculated.

RESULTS

Across all types of transplantation, nonadherence to clinic appointments and tests was most prevalent, at 12.9 cases per 100 patients per year (PPY). The immunosuppression nonadherence rate was six cases per 100 PPY. Nonadherence to substance use restrictions, diet, exercise, and other healthcare requirements ranged from 0.6 to 8 cases per 100 PPY. Only the rate of nonadherence to clinic appointments and tests varied by transplant type: heart recipients had the lowest rate (4.6 cases per 100 PPY vs. 12.7-18.8 cases per 100 PPY in other recipients). Older age of the child, family functioning (greater parental distress and lower family cohesion), and the child's psychological status (poorer behavioral functioning and greater distress) were among the psychosocial characteristics significantly correlated with poorer adherence. These correlations were small to modest in size (r=0.12-0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

These nonadherence rates provide benchmarks for clinicians to use to estimate patient risk. The identified psychosocial correlates of nonadherence are potential targets for intervention. Future studies should focus on improving the prediction of nonadherence risk and on testing interventions to reduce risk.

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Docetaxel between African-American and Caucasian Cancer Patients: CALGB 9871

PURPOSE

Increased clearance of drugs, such as oral cyclosporine, that are CYP3A and/or ABCB1 (P-gp/MDR1) substrates was reported in African-American compared with Caucasian patients. We hypothesized that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel, an i.v. administered cytotoxic and substrate for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1, would differ between African-American and Caucasian patients.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We investigated population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the pharmacogenetics of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients who received docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m(2) as a 1-h i.v. infusion. Plasma docetaxel concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Clinical toxicity and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were monitored on days 8, 15, and 22 postadministration of docetaxel. Using a limited sampling strategy and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, each patient's docetaxel clearance was estimated. Genotyping for known polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 was done.

RESULTS

We enrolled 109 patients: 40 African-Americans (26 males; 14 females), with a median age of 61 years (range, 29-73), and 69 Caucasians (43 males; 26 females), with a median age of 63 years (range, 38-81). There was no difference in the geometric mean docetaxel clearance between African-American patients [40.3 L/h; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 19.3-84.1] and Caucasian patients (41.8 L/h; 95% CI, 22.0-79.7; P = 0.6). We observed no difference between African-American and Caucasian patients in the percentage decrease in ANC nor were docetaxel pharmacokinetic parameters related to the genotypes studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Docetaxel clearance and its associated myelosuppression were similar in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients.

Pharmacogenetic differences and drug-drug interactions in immunosuppressive therapy

With the advent of new immunosuppressants and formulations, the elucidation of molecular targets and the evolution of therapeutic drug monitoring, the field of organ transplantation has witnessed significant reductions in acute rejection rates, prolonged graft survival and improved patient outcome. Nonetheless, challenges persist in the use of immunosuppressive medications. Marked interindividual variability remains in drug concentrations and drug response. As medications with narrow therapeutic indices, variations in immunosuppressant concentrations can result in acute toxicity or transplant rejection. Recent studies have begun to identify factors that contribute to this variability with the promise of tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient. These advances have uncovered differences in genetic composition in drug-metabolising enzymes, drug transporters and drug targets. This review focuses on commonly used maintenance immunosuppressants (including cyclosporin, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, azathioprine and corticosteroids), examines current studies on pharmacogenetic differences in drug-metabolising enzymes, drug transporters and drug targets and addresses common drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressant therapies. The potential role of drug-metabolising enzymes in contributing to these drug-drug interactions is briefly considered.

Ethnic or Racial Differences Revisited

Ethnic or racial differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics have been attributed to the distinctions in the genetic, physiological and pathological factors between ethnic/racial groups. These pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic differences are also known to be influenced by several extrinsic factors such as socioeconomic background, culture, diet and environment. However, it is noted that other factors related to dosage regimen and dosage form have largely been ignored or overlooked when conducting or analysing pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies in relation to ethnicity/race. Potential interactions can arise between the characteristics of ethnicity/race and a unique feature of dosage regimen or dosage form used in the study, which may partly account for the observed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic differences between ethnic/racial groups. Ethnic/racial differences in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics can occur from drug administration through a specific route that imparts distinct pattern of absorption, distribution, transport, metabolism or excretion. For example, racial differences in the first-pass metabolism of a drug following oral administration may not be relevant when the drug is applied to the skin. On the other hand, ethnic/racial difference in pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics can also happen via two different routes of drug delivery, with varying levels of dissimilarity between routes. For example, greater ethnic/racial differences were observed in oral clearance than in systemic clearance of some drugs, which might be explained by the pre-systemic factors involved in the oral administration as opposed to the intravenous administration. Similarly, changes in the dose frequency and/or duration may have profound impact on the ethnic/racial differences in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic outcome. Saturation of enzymes, transporters or receptors at high drug concentrations is a possible reason for many observed ethnic/racial discrepancies between single- and multiple-dose regimens, or between low- and high-dose administrations. The presence of genetic polymorphism of enzymes and/or transporters can further complicate the analysis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data in ethnic/racial populations. Even within the same dosage regimen, the use of different dosage forms may trigger significantly different pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic responses in various ethnic/racial groups, given that different dosage forms may exhibit different rates of drug release, may release the drug at different sites, and/or have different retention times at specific sites of the body. It is thus cautioned that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data obtained from different ethnic/racial groups cannot be indiscriminately compared or combined for analysis if there is a lack of homogeneity in the apparent 'extrinsic' factors, including dosage regimen and dosage form.

Post-Transplantation Diabetes Mellitus

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is defined as sustained hyperglycemia developing in any patient without history of diabetes before transplantation, that meets the current diagnostic criteria by the American Diabetes Association or the World Health Organization. Several risk factors have been identified: age, nonwhite ethnicity, and glucocorticoid therapy for rejection and chronic immunosuppression with cyclosporine and especially tacrolimus. The pathophysiology of this condition resembles that of type 2 diabetes mellitus: pretransplantation end-stage liver/renal and heart disease are insulin-resistant states, and after transplantation, glucocorticoids induce further peripheral insulin insensitivity. The "second hit" appears to be an acquired (yet reversible) insulin secretion defect resulting from the calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus. An international panel of experts has recently published the proceeding of a Consensus Conference proposing strategies for the screening, prevention and management of PTDM. Future directions include pre- and post-transplantation glucose load testing for high-risk individuals and pharmacological agents to decrease insulin resistance and to preserve beta-cell function.

Prospects for personalized immunosuppression: pharmacologic tools--a review

In the last few years, novel immunosuppressive agents and new formulations, including sirolimus, mycophenolic acid (the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil), tacrolimus, and microemulsion cyclosporine, have significantly improved the clinical outcome of transplant recipients. However, the majority of immunosuppressive agents need a constant monitoring of drug levels to reduce the risk of graft rejection as well as drug-induced toxicities. Many factors may affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of immunosuppressive agents, potentially reducing treatment effectiveness. Absorption and metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs are influenced by patient genotype and comedications, while comorbidities (ie, diabetes and cystic fibrosis) are responsible for altered pharmacokinetics. Dose individualization in transplant recipients is performed according to their health status, graft function, and drug therapeutic range. With respect to the last issue, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in achieving optimal immunosuppression, improving the efficacy of drugs, and lowering toxic effects. Pharmacokinetic analysis allowed the identification of specific parameters, such as plasma or blood levels, immediately before dosing (C(min) or trough levels) or 2 hours after administration (C(2)), which are significantly related to tissue exposure to the drug. More recently, studies have investigated treatment individualization by evaluating drug pharmacogenetics based on the expression level or mutations of their molecular targets, including calcineurin for cyclosporine and tacrolimus, and inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase for mycophenolic acid. Although no conclusive data may be drawn from these preliminary trials, further studies are underway to address the role of pharmacogenetics in clinical decision making.

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid associated with calcineurin inhibitors: long-term monitoring in stable lung recipients with and without cystic fibrosis

Pharmacologic interactions and absorption disturbances after transplantation may induce serologic fluctuation of immunosuppression and adversely affect outcome. We present data showing that trough levels of mycophenolic acid decreased by 50% during combined mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine therapy compared with levels during combined MMF and tacrolimus therapy. In addition, cystic fibrosis patients required 30% higher doses of MMF to achieve the therapeutic levels of recipients without cystic fibrosis.

A review of nutritional problems and the cystic fibrosis lung transplant patient

Lung transplantation is an option for some cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. CF is associated with a variety of non-pulmonary problems, which should be managed before and after transplantation. This commentary discusses some of the nutritional issues affecting CF patients. Theses issues include: the need for nutritional supplements; gastrostomy tube placement; osteoporosis and diabetes.

Thiazolidinedione therapy in a patient with diabetes after cardiac transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the successful use of a thiazolidinedione agent for the treatment of diabetes diagnosed after heart transplantation.

METHODS

We present a case report of a 51-year-old woman who underwent cardiac transplantation because of cardiomyopathy; diabetes developed 6 months later. Her clinical course and serial laboratory findings are documented as insulin therapy was initiated and subsequently transitioned to rosiglitazone during maintenance of the immunosuppressive regimen.

RESULTS

After rosiglitazone therapy was instituted, the patient's insulin dose was gradually tapered and eventually stopped. Target glycemic control was maintained without apparent aggravation of cardiac function or volume overload. No deleterious effects on other organ systems or interactions with the antirejection medications were noted during close follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Rosiglitazone may be safe and effective therapy for patients with posttransplantation diabetes. Rosiglitazone also helps to counteract the insulin-resistant state and reduces or eliminates the need for exogenous insulin. Further studies should attempt to confirm the usefulness of treatment with thiazolidinediones for patients with diabetes after organ transplantation.