Hepatitis C virus infection and de novo glomerular lesions in renal allografts

Shear Wave Elastography for Assessing Liver Stiffness in HCV-Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients after Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment: A Comparative Study with Magnetic Resonance Elastography

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can lead to hepatic fibrosis. The advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has substantially improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates. In this context, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are of particular interest due to their higher HCV infection rates and uncertain renal excretion and bioavailability of DAAs. We investigated liver stiffness after DAA treatment in 15 HCV-infected KTRs using ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in comparison with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). KTRs were treated with DAAs (daclatasvir and sofosbuvir) for three months and underwent SWE at baseline, end of therapy (EOT), and 3 (EOT+3) and 12 months (EOT+12) after EOT. Fourteen patients achieved SVR12. Shear wave speed (SWS)-as a surrogate parameter for tissue stiffness-was substantially lower at all three post-therapeutic timepoints compared with baseline (EOT: -0.42 m/s, p < 0.01; CI = -0.75--0.09, EOT+3: -0.43 m/s, p < 0.01; CI = -0.75--0.11, and EOT+12: -0.52 m/s, p < 0.001; CI = -0.84--0.19), suggesting liver regeneration after viral eradication and end of inflammation. Baseline SWS correlated positively with histopathological fibrosis scores (r = 0.48; CI = -0.11-0.85). Longitudinal results correlated moderately with APRI (r = 0.41; CI = 0.12-0.64) but not with FIB-4 scores (r = 0.12; CI = -0.19-0.41). Although higher on average, SWE-derived measurements correlated strongly with MRE (r = 0.64). In conclusion, SWE is suitable for non-invasive therapy monitoring in KTRs with HCV infection.

Interventions for dialysis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis, causes chronic liver disease, may increase the risk of death, and impacts kidney transplant outcomes. Direct-acting antivirals have replaced interferons because of better efficacy and tolerability. This is an update of a review first published in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to look at the benefits and harms of interventions for HCV in CKD patients on dialysis: death, disease relapse, treatment response/discontinuation, time to recovery, quality of life (QoL), cost-effectiveness, and adverse events. We aimed to study comparisons of available interventions, compared with placebo, control, with each other and with newer treatments.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register to 23 February 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE, handsearching conference proceedings, and searching the International Clinical Trials Register Portal (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, first period of randomised cross-over studies on interventions for HCV in CKD on dialysis were considered.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies were included in this update, therefore 13 studies (997 randomised participants) met our inclusion criteria. Overall, the risk of bias was judged low in seven studies, unclear in four, low to unclear in one, and high in one study. Interventions included standard interferon, pegylated (PEG) interferon, standard or PEG interferon plus ribavirin; direct-acting antivirals, and direct-acting antivirals plus PEG interferon plus ribavirin. Compared to placebo or control, standard interferon may make little or no difference to death (5 studies, 134 participants: RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.06 to 13.23) or relapse (low certainty evidence), probably improves end-of-treatment response (ETR) (5 studies, 132 participants: RR 8.62, 95% CI 3.03 to 24.55; I² = 0%) (moderate certainty evidence), and probably makes little or no difference to sustained virological response (SVR) (4 studies, 98 participants: RR 3.25, 95% CI 0.81 to 13.07; I² = 53%), treatment discontinuation (4 studies, 116 participants: RR 4.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 42.69; I² = 63%), and adverse events (5 studies, 143 participants: RR 3.56, 95% CI 0.98 to 13.01; I² = 25%) (moderate certainty evidence). In low certainty evidence, PEG interferon (1 study, 50 participants) may improve ETR (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.15) but may make little or no difference to death (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.81), SVR (RR 2.40, 95% CI 0.99 to 5.81), treatment discontinuation (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.96), adverse events (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.96) and relapses (21/38 relapsed) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.25) compared to standard interferon. In moderate certainty evidence, high-dose PEG interferon (alpha-2a and alpha-2b) may make little or no difference to death (2 studies, 97 participants: RR 4.30, 95% CI 0.76 to 24.33; I² = 0%), ETR (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.51 to 3.90; I² = 20%), SVR (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.07; I² = 0%), treatment discontinuation (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.28; I² = 0%) or adverse events (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.83; I² = 27%) compared to low-dose PEG interferon. High-dose PEG interferon may make little or no difference to relapses (1 study, 43 participants: RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.77; low certainty evidence). There were no significant subgroup differences. Standard interferon plus ribavirin may lead to higher treatment discontinuation (1 study, 52 participants: RR 2.97, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.36; low certainty evidence) compared to standard interferon alone.  In low certainty evidence, PEG interferon plus ribavirin (1 study, 377 participants) may improve SVR (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.46 to 2.21), reduce relapses (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.48), slightly increase the number with adverse events (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.19), and may make little or no difference to ETR (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.09) compared to PEG interferon alone. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of PEG interferon plus ribavirin on treatment discontinuation (RR 1.71, 95% CI 0.69 to 4.24) compared to PEG interferon alone. One study reported grazoprevir plus elbasvir improved ETR (173 participants: RR 174.99, 95% CI 11.03 to 2775.78; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo. It is uncertain whether telaprevir plus ribavirin (high versus low initial dose) plus PEG interferon for 24 versus 48 weeks (1 study, 35 participants) improves ETR (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.56) or SVR (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.56) because the certainty of the evidence is very low.  Data on QoL, cost-effectiveness, cardiovascular outcomes and peritoneal dialysis were not available.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In dialysis patients with HCV infection grazoprevir plus elbasvir probably improves ETR. There is no difference in ETR or SVR for combinations of telaprevir, ribavirin and PEG interferon given for different durations and doses. Though no longer in use, PEG interferon was more effective than standard interferon for ETR but not SVR. Increasing doses of PEG interferon did not improve responses. The addition of ribavirin to PEG interferon may result in fewer relapses, higher SVR, and higher numbers with adverse events.

Glomerular Diseases of the Kidney Allograft: Toward a Precision Medicine Approach

The continual development of potent immunosuppressive regimens has led to a decreased incidence of acute rejection and improvement of short-term kidney allograft survival. In contrast to acute rejection, glomerular diseases of the kidney allograft are being encountered more frequently and are emerging as leading causes of late kidney allograft failure. Although data on the pathogeneses of glomerular diseases in the kidney allograft are sparse, cumulative evidence suggests that post-transplant glomerular diseases may be the result of inherited predispositions and immunologic triggers. Although studying immunologic signals and performing genome-wide association studies are ideal approaches to tackle glomerular diseases in the kidney allograft, such studies are challenging because of the lack of adequately powered cohorts. In this review, we focus on the most commonly encountered recurrent and de novo glomerular diseases in the kidney allograft. We address the important advances made in understanding the immunopathology and genetic susceptibility of glomerular diseases in the native kidney and how to benefit from such knowledge to further our knowledge of post-transplant glomerular diseases. Defining genomic and immune predictors for glomerular diseases in the kidney allograft would support novel donor-recipient matching strategies and development of targeted therapies to ultimately improve long-term kidney allograft survival.

De novo Glomerular Disease and the Significance of Electron Microscopy in Renal Transplantation

Background

De novo glomerular diseases comprising those both common and unique to transplant may develop in the renal allograft leading to posttransplant proteinuria, hematuria, or allograft failure. Electron microscopy (EM) is a useful adjunct to the standard light and immunofluorescence microscopy for accurately diagnosing these diseases and subsequently aiding the clinician in initiating appropriate treatments.

Summary

De novo diseases are those new-onset diseases in renal transplantation that are unrelated to the original kidney disease in the recipient. They include virtually any primary or secondary glomerular, tubulointerstitial, or vascular diseases, ranging from subclinical to clinically overt, having acute, subacute, or chronic clinical presentations. This review focuses on common or significant, mainly glomerular, entities, with particular attention to the EM findings. The time of onset, stage, and severity of these diseases may often be modified by the current immunosuppressive protocols and other donor and recipient predisposing characteristics.

Key Messages

A renal allograft biopsy not only improves our understanding of the pathophysiology but also provides diagnostic accuracy prognostic information, and potential for reversibility. In some cases, the biopsy leads to detection of unsuspected or clinically asymptomatic de novo diseases in the setting of other concomitant rejection processes, infection, or toxicity, which can dictate appropriate therapy. Routine EM in transplant kidney biopsies is a valuable modality in recognizing fully developed or early/subtle features of evolving de novo diseases, often during the subclinical phases, in "for cause" or surveillance/protocol allograft biopsies.

Clinical utility of hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVcAg) assay to identify active HCV infection in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of HCV infection is high and it is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients. Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires both HCV antibody screening and confirmatory nucleic acid testing (NAT). Hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVcAg) is a reliable direct viral marker to identify active HCV infection.

AIM

To assess the clinical utility of HCV core antigen to identify active HCV infection in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients.

METHODS

A representative total of 231 plasma samples with a predominance of low viral load were included for HCVcAg testing and its performance characteristics were compared with the gold standard HCV RNA.

RESULTS

Comparison of HCVcAg with HCV RNA showed an excellent specificity of 99% (95% CI: 94.7 to 100%) and sensitivity of 80.62% (95% CI: 73.59 to 87.7%). Likewise, the PPV and NPV of HCVcAg were 99.1% (95% CI: 93.7% to 99.9%) and 80.2% (95% CI: 74% to 85.2%) respectively. The correlation between HCVcAg and HCV RNA was found to be good (R2 = 0.86, p<0.0001). Among common Indian HCV genotypes (1, 3 & 4), good correlation was observed between HCV RNA and HCVcAg (R2 = 0.81, p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

It is the first Indian study to show that HCVcAg is a reliable, cost-effective direct marker to identify active HCV infection in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients. Implementation of HCVcAg testing could improve the accessibility to efficacious and affordable disease management in hemodialysis and renal transplant patients. In HCVcAg negative cases, sequential testing with anti-HCV antibody followed by HCV RNA could be a reliable and cost-effective approach.

The Psychosocial Burden of HCV Infection and the Impact of Antiviral Therapy on the Quality of Life in Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Pilot Study

Background

Therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for HCV is safe and effective in the liver (LT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients; however, data on the quality of life (QoL) of patients are scanty. This pilot study is aimed at prospectively evaluating the QoL in LT and KT recipients before and after DAA treatment.

Methods

We prospectively enrolled 17 LT and 11 KT recipients with HCV infection starting a sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy for 12 weeks. All participants before (T0), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) weeks after the end of the therapy completed the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire, the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale, and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI—Y1–Y2).

Results

At T0, LT and KT patients were similar for gender, age, BMI, smoking habits, marital status, mean liver stiffness values at Fibroscan, and HCV genotype distribution (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in STAI-Y1, STAI-Y2, Zung, and SF-36 scores (p > 0.05). At T12, all the participants showed a sustained virological response (SVR). All items of the SF-36 questionnaire improved from the pretreatment to posttreatment period within the LT group, and the 4 domains role-physical, bodily pain, social function, role-emotional, and mental health reached statistical significance (p < 0.05 in all cases). On the contrary, in KT patients, there was no significant improvement in SF-36 mean scores compared to at baseline at T12 and T24.

Conclusions

This pilot study suggested that DAA therapy is associated with a significant improvement of the QoL only in LT recipients. Probably, KT recipients did not consider HCV a “central player” in the course of their disease, and HCV eradication did not significantly impact on their QoL.

Impact of Donor Hepatitis C Virus on Kidney Transplant Outcomes for Hepatitis C-positive Recipients in the Direct-acting Antiviral Era: Time to Revise the Kidney Donor Risk Index?

BACKGROUND

Kidneys from donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are traditionally considered to be at risk for poorer survival outcomes, as reflected in the kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Modern direct-acting antivirals may modify this risk.

METHODS

Using United Network for Organ Sharing data, HCV-infected adult first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2014 to 2017 were examined. Graft and patient survival were compared in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV antibody (Ab)(+) kidneys versus Ab(-) kidneys. Subsequent analysis was performed in a propensity-matched cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic (RNA positive) versus HCV-naïve kidneys.

RESULTS

There were 379 recipients each in the matched cohort of recipients of HCV Ab(+) versus HCV Ab(-) kidneys. Despite a higher KDPI (58.2% for HCV Ab[+] versus 38.8% for HCV Ab[-]), 1-year patient and graft survival were similar in the HCV(+) and HCV(-) groups (95.4% and 94.9% versus 97.9% and 96.0%, P = 0.543 and P = 0.834, respectively). There were 200 recipients each in the cohort of recipients of HCV-viremic versus HCV-naïve kidneys, with the KDPI again higher in the HCV-viremic group (56.8% versus 35.2%). Baseline hazard ratios (HRs) for graft failure (HR, 4.69; P = 0.009) and death (HR, 7.60; P = 0.003) were significantly elevated in the viremic group, but crossed 1 at 21 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the modern direct-acting antiviral era, calculated likely KDPI overestimates risk kidneys from HCV (+) donors. Donor viremia conveys an early risk which appears to subside over time. These results suggest that it may be time to revise the kidney donor risk index.

Direct Acting Antivirals in Hepatitis C-Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients: Associations with Long-term Graft Failure and Patient Mortality

Background

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy among hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected kidney transplant recipients is associated with short-term improvement in protein/creatinine (P/C) ratios, but how HCV cure affects long-term graft outcomes remains unknown.

Methods

This is a retrospective follow-up study of 59 HCV-infected patients who underwent kidney transplant at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2007-2015 who were followed until the end of 2017. We examined the association of DAA-induced HCV cure with graft failure or death by survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier, Cox regression).

Results

Mean age was 55 years, 73% were African American, and 68% were male. Median baseline creatinine was 1.4 mg/dL, P/C ratio was 0.5, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 59 mL/min. Of those who received DAA, 24 (83%) achieved cure. The remaining 5 DAA patients (17%) did not have documented evidence of sustained virologic response (SVR). Overall, 19 (32%) patients experienced graft failure or death; with lower incidence in treated patients than untreated (4 vs 15 events; 2.6 vs 10.3 per 100 person-years [cHR 0.19, 95% CI: 0.06-0.66]). When adjusted for age, sex, race, and proteinuria, the association remained strong and invariant across time-varying (aHR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.08-1.10), time-averaged (aHR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.07-1.07), and time-varying-cumulative (aHR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.08-1.21) proteinuria metrics.

Conclusions

DAAs therapy was associated with improved graft survival and reduced mortality. While not statistically significant, the association was strong, and these single-center findings warrant larger studies to demonstrate the benefits of HCV treatment in this population.

Current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, hepatitis C, and hepatitis B infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) are common chronic viral infections in the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient population that were once considered relative contraindications to kidney transplantation. In this review, we will summarize the current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV, which is rapidly evolving. HIV+ patients enjoy excellent outcomes in the modern transplant era and may have new transplant opportunities with the use of HIV+ donors. Direct-acting antivirals for HCV have substantially changed the landscape of care for patients with HCV infection. HBV+ patients now have excellent patient and allograft survival with HBV therapy. Currently, kidney transplantation is a safe and appropriate treatment for the majority of ESKD patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV.

Hepatitis c virus and chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with an increased incidence and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as higher mortality in CKD and renal transplant patients. Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of HCV, with viral eradication attained in 90-100% of treated patients. DAAs have an excellent safety and tolerability profile in CKD and renal transplant patients.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the association of HCV with incidence and progression of CKD as well as its effect on outcomes and mortality. We also discuss the available treatment options in patients with CKD and renal transplant and in HCV-associated glomerular disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of newly available direct acting anti-viral agents has revolutionized the treatment of HCV in persons with advanced CKD and undergoing dialysis. With these regimens, viral eradication can be attained in 90-100% of the treated patients. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these drugs in renal transplant patients have also made it possible to use HCV-infected grafts and successful virus eradication at a later stage.

Association of HLA Typing and Alloimmunity With Posttransplantation Membranous Nephropathy: A Multicenter Case Series

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES

Posttransplantation membranous nephropathy (MN) represents a rare complication of kidney transplantation that can be classified as recurrent or de novo. The clinical, pathologic, and immunogenetic characteristics of posttransplantation MN and the differences between de novo and recurrent MN are not well understood.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter case series.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

We included 77 patients from 5 North American and European medical centers with post-kidney transplantation MN (27 de novo and 50 recurrent). Patients with MN in the native kidney who received kidney allografts but did not develop recurrent MN were used as nonrecurrent controls (n = 43). To improve understanding of posttransplantation MN, we compared de novo MN with recurrent MN and then contrasted recurrent MN with nonrecurrent controls.

FINDINGS

Compared with recurrent MN, de novo MN was less likely to be classified as primary MN (OR, 0.04; P < 0.001) and had more concurrent antibody-mediated rejection (OR, 12.0; P < 0.001) and inferior allograft survival (HR for allograft failure, 3.2; P = 0.007). HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DR17 antigens were more common in recipients with recurrent MN compared with those with de novo MN; however, the frequency of these recipient antigens in recurrent MN was similar to that in nonrecurrent MN controls. Among the 93 kidney transplant recipients with native kidney failure attributed to MN, older recipient age (HR per each year older, 1.03; P = 0.02), recipient HLA-A3 antigen (HR, 2.5; P = 0.003), steroid-free immunosuppressive regimens (HR, 2.84; P < 0.001), and living related allograft (HR, 1.94; P = 0.03) were predictors of MN recurrence.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective case series, limited sample size due to rarity of the disease, nonstandardized nature of data collection and biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

De novo and recurrent MN likely represent separate diseases. De novo MN is associated with humoral alloimmunity and guarded outcome. Potential predisposing factors for recurrent MN include recipients who are older, recipient HLA-A3 antigen, steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen, and living related donor kidney.

Association between transplant glomerulopathy and graft outcomes following kidney transplantation: A meta-analysis

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG), a morphological lesion associated with confluent mechanisms of endothelial injury of renal allografts, may provide a viable predictor of graft failure. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed according to the PRISMA statement to examine evidence describing the association between TG and graft loss or failure and time to these events. The literature review was conducted using the Scopus, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library search engines. Hazard ratios, median survival times, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate graft survival in the total population and prespecified subgroups. Meta-regression analysis assessed heterogeneity. Twenty-one publications comprising 6,783 patients were eligible for data extraction and inclusion in the meta-analysis. Studies were highly heterogeneous (I² = 67.3%). The combined hazard ratio of graft loss or failure from random-effects meta-analysis was 3.11 (95% CI 2.44–3.96) in patients with TG compared with those without. Median graft survival in patients with TG was 3.25 (95% CI 0.94–11.21) years—15 years shorter than in those without TG (18.82 [95% CI 10.03–35.32] years). The effect of time from transplantation to biopsy on graft outcomes did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.116). TG was associated with a threefold increase in the risk of graft loss or failure and a 15-year loss in graft survival, indicating viability as a surrogate measure for both clinical practice and studies designed to prevent or reverse antibody-mediated rejection.

Outcomes After Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy Based on Donor Hepatitis C Serostatus Among Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients

OBJECTIVES

Renal grafts from hepatitis C virus-positive deceased donors, which were once discarded, can now be transplanted into recipients and treated posttransplant due to the emergence of direct-acting antivirals, significantly improving wait list time and organ shortages. Here, we compared outcomes in hepatitis C virus-positive patients who received kidneys from hepatitis C virus-positive versus -negative donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, we divided 52 kidney transplant recipients who were viremic for hepatitis C virus pretransplant into 2 groups based on donors' hepatitis C virus serostatus (positive/negative). Demographics, time to transplant, efficacy of direct-acting antivirals, rejection episodes, immunosuppression adjustments, and renal function were assessed in both groups.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 50 patients receiving kidneys from deceased donors and 2 from living donors (1 related, 1 unrelated). Recipients of hepatitis C virus-positive kidneys had significantly less wait list time (36 days) than recipients of hepatitis C virus-negative kidneys (806 days; P < .001). All recipients responded well to direct-acting antivirals, with both groups showing similar sustained virologic response rates that were comparable to the general population. Intention-to-treat analyses showed rates of 91% and 100% in donor seropositive and donor seronegative groups, respectively (P = .273). Four antibody-mediated rejection episodes occurred in the donor seropositive and one mixed rejection in the donor seronegative group. Tacrolimus dose adjustments were required in 54% and 59% of recipients in the donor seropositive and seronegative groups, respectively. Recipients in the donor seropositive group had lower rates of worsening renal function than recipients in the donor seronegative group (11% vs 17.5%; P = .519).

CONCLUSIONS

In hepatitis C-positive recipients with donor negative or donor positive hepatitis C virus serostatus, response of direct-acting antiviral response was not significantly different and renal allograft function was maintained without any evidence of long-term adverse consequences to the graft.

Eliminating Hepatitis C Virus From a Prevalent Kidney Transplant Recipient Population: A Single-Center Study in Belgium in the Direct-Acting Antivirals Era

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although previous studies have reported positive results with DAAs after kidney transplantation (KT), their impact on the prevalence of HCV viremia (HCVv) in prevalent kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains ill defined.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the HCV status of all patients followed at Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, outpatient KT clinic between January 2014 and December 2018. We collected the clinical features of KTRs treated with DAAs during this period and calculated the annual prevalence of HCVv over this period.

RESULTS

Out of 1451 KTRs, 22 (1.52%) had HCVv in 2014 to 2018. From 2014 to 2018, the annual prevalence of HCVv dropped from 1.97% to 0.43%, (P < .001). Fourteen KTRs were treated with DAAs a median of 197 months (range: 5-374) after KT, mostly (79%) in 2017 after reimbursement restrictions of DAAs for KTRs in Belgium were removed. DAA treatment was safe with a sustained virological response rate at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) of 93%. Two patients died 14 months (lymphoma, despite SVR12) and 7 months (hepatocarcinoma, no SVR12) after DAAs initiation, respectively. Among HCVv KTRs not treated with DAAs (n = 8), 2 lost their graft, 5 died, and 1 is initiating therapy. The current prevalence of HCVv in the cohort is 0.08%, with a single patient currently on treatment.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with DAAs led to a dramatic decrease of HCVv prevalence in this KTR cohort. DAA use was safe and effective. Elimination of HCV is possible at KT clinics.

Membranous Nephropathy Posttransplantation: An Update of the Pathophysiology and Management

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a common cause of nephrotic syndrome after transplantation and is associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. MN may occur either as a recurrent or as a de novo disease. As in native kidneys, the pathophysiology of the MN recurrence is in most cases associated with antiphospholipid A2 receptor antibodies. However, the posttransplant course has some distinct features when compared with primary MN, including a lower chance of spontaneous remission and a greater requirement for adjuvant immunosuppressive therapy to induce complete remission. Although the efficacy of rituximab in primary MN is now well established, no randomized studies have assessed its effectiveness in MN after transplant, and there are no specific recommendations for the management of these patients. This review aims to synthesize and update the pathophysiology of posttransplant MN, as well as to address unsolved issues specific to transplantation, including the prognostic value of antiphospholipid A2 receptor, the risk of living-related donation, the link between de novo MN and rejection, and different therapeutic strategies so far deployed in posttransplant MN. Lastly, we propose a management algorithm for patients with MN who are planning to receive a kidney transplant, including pretransplant considerations, posttransplant monitoring, and the clinical approach after the diagnosis of recurrence.

Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Renal Function in Post-Kidney Transplant Patients Infected with Hepatitis C Virus and a 100% 12-Week Sustained Virologic Response: A Single-Center Study

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection after renal transplantation has been controversial due to the high rate of graft rejections with interferon (IFN)-based therapies. The aim of this study is to review our experience of direct acting antiviral therapy for the recipients of renal transplantation. Eleven recipients who were hepatitis C virus-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positive were eligible for the treatment with direct acting antivirals. Six recipients were treated with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir, three were treated with elbasvir and grazoprevir, and one was treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks. One recipient was treated with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir for 8 weeks. All of the 11 recipients exhibited sustained virologic response at week 12 after the end of treatment. Adverse events were scarce including the two recipients who switched to tacrolimus from cyclosporine at the beginning of the treatment. The direct acting antiviral therapy including new agents appears to be safe and highly efficacious for the recipients after renal transplantation.

Living kidney donation in individuals with hepatitis C and HIV infection: rationale and emerging evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HIV-infected (HIV+) and hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have decreased access to kidney transplantation. With new opportunities provided by the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV, we explore the potential risks and benefits of living donor kidney transplantation from HIV+ or HCV+ donors, from the perspective of both donor health and recipient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The HOPE Act permits organ donation from both deceased and living HIV+ persons to HIV+ recipients; however, there is only clinical experience with HIV+ deceased donors to date. Empirical evidence demonstrates a low but acceptable risk of ESRD in potential HIV+ living donors without comorbidities who have well-controlled infection in the absence of donation. With the availability of potent DAAs for eradication of HCV infection, growing evidence shows good outcomes with HCV seropositive and/or viremic deceased kidney donors, providing rationale to consider HCV+ living donors.

SUMMARY

HIV+ and HCV+ living donor kidney transplantation may improve access to transplant for vulnerable ESRD populations. Careful evaluation and monitoring are warranted to mitigate potential risks to donors and recipients.

Timing of hepatitis C virus infection treatment in kidney transplant candidates

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in patients with kidney disease including transplant candidates and recipients. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease patients and also increases the risk of allograft rejection and decreases allograft and patient survival post-transplant. Newly developed direct acting antivirals have revolutionized the way HCV is treated. Whether patients are treated before or after kidney transplantation, the cure rates with direct acting antivirals are >90%. Great debate has formed revolving the optimal timing to treat kidney transplant candidates. On the one hand, treatment before transplantation decreases early post-transplant complications related to HCV. On the other, postponing treatment until after transplantation opens the possibility of transplanting a kidney from a HCV positive donor, which is associated with shorter waiting time and improved organ utilization by expanding the organ donor pool. Most patients living in an area where waiting time is reduced by accepting an HCV positive kidney would benefit by the strategy of treatment post-transplantation, but this decision needs to be individualized in a patient-by-patient basis given that there are special circumstances (i.e., severe HCV-related extrahepatic manifestations, availability of live donors, etc.) in which treatment before transplant might be preferred.

Transplantation of hepatitis C virus infected kidneys into hepatitis C virus uninfected recipients

Long wait times for kidney transplant and the high risk of mortality on dialysis have prompted investigation into strategies to increase organ allocation and decrease discard rates of potentially viable kidneys. Organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive donors are often rejected; nearly 500 HCV-infected kidneys are discarded annually in the United States. Due the opioid epidemic, the number of HCV-infected donors has increased because of a rise in both new HCV infections and drug-related deaths. In the past 5 years, HCV has been transformed into a curable illness with direct-acting antiviral therapies (DAAs) that are effective in >95% of patients treated and are extremely well tolerated. Recent data has shown several direct-acting antiviral combinations are safe and effective after kidney transplant, and can achieve the same high cure rate seen in the general population and without increasing the rate of acute rejection. Because of this, strategies to decrease discard of HCV-infected organs have been devised. Two recent studies have transplanted HCV-uninfected dialysis patients with kidneys from donors actively infected with HCV; recipients were treated with DAA in the peri-transplant period. More research is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of this approach, but it has the potential to dramatically increase the donor pool of available kidneys, shorten waitlist times and ultimately decreases mortality in patients waiting for kidney transplant.

Eradication of HCV Infection with the Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in Renal Allograft Recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection unfavorably affects the survival of both renal patients undergoing hemodialysis and renal transplant recipients. In this subset of patients, the effectiveness and safety of different combinations of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have been analyzed in several small studies. Despite fragmentary, the available data demonstrate that DAA treatment is safe and effective in eradicating HCV infection, with a sustained virologic response (SVR) rates nearly 95% and without an increased risk of allograft rejection. This review article analyzes the results of most published studies on this topic to favor more in-depth knowledge of the readers on the subject. We suggest, however, perseverating in this update as the optimal DAA regimen may not be proposed yet, because of the expected arrival of newer DAAs and of the lack of data from large multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Non-immunological complications following kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the most effective way to decrease the high morbidity and mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease. However, KT does not completely reverse the damage done by years of decreased kidney function and dialysis. Furthermore, new offending agents (in particular, immunosuppression) added in the post-transplant period increase the risk of complications. Cardiovascular (CV) disease, the leading cause of death in KT recipients, warrants pre-transplant screening based on risk factors. Nevertheless, the screening methods currently used have many shortcomings and a perfect screening modality does not exist. Risk factor modification in the pre- and post-transplant periods is of paramount importance to decrease the rate of CV complications post-transplant, either by lifestyle modification (for example, diet, exercise, and smoking cessation) or by pharmacological means (for example, statins, anti-hyperglycemics, and so on). Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major contributor to mortality in this patient population. Although tacrolimus is a major contributor to PTDM development, changes in immunosuppression are limited by the higher risk of rejection with other agents. Immunosuppression has also been implicated in higher risk of malignancy; therefore, proper cancer screening is needed. Cancer immunotherapy is drastically changing the way certain types of cancer are treated in the general population; however, its use post-transplant is limited by the risk of allograft rejection. As expected, higher risk of infections is also encountered in transplant recipients. When caring for KT recipients, special attention is needed in screening methods, preventive measures, and treatment of infection with BK virus and cytomegalovirus. Hepatitis C virus infection is common in transplant candidates and in the deceased donor pool; however, newly developed direct-acting antivirals have been proven safe and effective in the pre- and post-transplant periods. The most important and recent developments on complications following KT are reviewed in this article.

Experience with antiviral agents for treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients on the kidney wait list

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant patients. The ability to establish a sustained viral response before renal transplant is important for these patients. Direct-acting antiviral agents can increase the sustained viral response in most patients with HCV infection. In this case series, we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of a combined therapy of ombitasvir, paritaprevir, ritonavir, and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis and on hemodialysis who were awaiting deceased-donor kidney transplant.

METHODS

Our study included eight male and two female HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA)-positive hemodialysis patients (mean age 50.7 ± 15 years, mean hemodialysis duration 14 ± 5.5 years, mean HCV duration 18 ± 3.7 years).

FINDINGS

Three patients with genotype 1a received oral therapy with 12.5 mg ombitasvir, 150 mg paritaprevir, 7 5 mg ritonavir, and 250 mg dasabuvir plus 200 mg ribavirin for 12 weeks. Seven patients with genotype 1b received 12.5 mg ombitasvir, 150 mg paritaprevir, 75 mg ritonavir, and 250 mg dasabuvir without ribavirin treatment for 12 weeks. The sustained virologic response rate was 100% at 12 weeks after completion of antiviral treatment in both treatment groups. No serious adverse effects were observed in either treatment group. Five patients had constitutional symptoms such as nausea, anorexia, and fatigue. During the treatment period, hemoglobin, white cell blood count, thrombocyte, and ferritin levels were similar to pretreatment levels. Treatment did not affect weekly erythropoietin and monthly intravenous iron treatment doses.

DISCUSSION

Direct-acting antiviral agents are safe and effective for generating a sustained viral response in HCV genotype 1-infected hemodialysis patients on kidney wait lists.

Mortality and Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Among Hepatitis C Virus-Seropositive Maintenance Dialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among maintenance dialysis patients. Few studies have examined both dialysis survival and transplantation outcomes for HCV-seropositive patients because registry data sets lack information for HCV serostatus.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adult long-term dialysis patients treated by a US national dialysis provider between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2014.

EXPOSURE

HCV antibody serostatus obtained as part of clinical data from a national dialysis provider.

OUTCOMES

Mortality on dialysis therapy, entry onto the kidney transplant waiting list, kidney transplantation, and estimated survival benefit from kidney transplantation versus remaining on the waitlist.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

After linking clinical data with data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, Cox and cause-specific hazards regression were implemented to estimate the associations between HCV seropositivity and mortality, as well as entry onto the kidney transplant waitlist. Cox regression was also used to estimate the survival benefit from transplantation versus dialysis among HCV-seropositive individuals.

RESULTS

Among 442,171 dialysis patients, 31,624 (7.2%) were HCV seropositive. HCV seropositivity was associated with a small elevation in the rate of death (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07-1.11) and a substantially lower rate of entry onto the kidney transplant waitlist (subdistribution HR [sHR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74). Once wait-listed, the kidney transplantation rate was not different for HCV-seropositive (sHR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.27) versus HCV-seronegative patients. HCV-seropositive patients lived longer with transplantation (aHR at 3 years, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.63). Receiving an HCV-seropositive donor kidney provided a survival advantage at the 2-year posttransplantation time point compared to remaining on dialysis therapy waiting for an HCV-negative kidney.

LIMITATIONS

No data for HCV viral load or liver biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV-seropositive patients experience reduced access to the kidney transplantation waitlist despite deriving a substantial survival benefit from transplantation. HCV-seropositive patients should consider foregoing HCV treatment while accepting kidneys from HCV-infected donors to facilitate transplantation and prolong survival.

Pharmacokinetics of elbasvir and grazoprevir in subjects with end-stage renal disease or severe renal impairment

PURPOSE

To describe the phase 1 and population pharmacokinetic investigations that support dosing recommendations for elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) in hepatitis C virus-infected people with advanced chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

This was an open-label, two-part, multiple-dose trial (MK-5172 PN050; NCT01937975) in 24 non-HCV-infected participants with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) or severe renal impairment who received once-daily EBR 50 mg and GZR 100 mg for 10 days. Population pharmacokinetic analyses from the phase 3 C-SURFER study (PN052, NCT02092350) were also conducted.

RESULTS

When comparing haemodialysis (HD) and non-HD days in participants with ESRD, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for EBR and GZR AUC_0-24 were 1.14 (1.08-1.21) and 0.97 (0.87-1.09). When comparing ESRD and healthy participants, GMRs (90% CIs) for EBR and GZR AUC_0-24 were 0.99 (0.75-1.30) and 0.83 (0.56-1.22) on HD days, and 0.86 (0.65-1.14) and 0.85 (0.58-1.25) on non-HD days. GMRs (90% CIs) for AUC_0-24 in participants with severe renal impairment relative to healthy controls were 1.65 (1.09-2.49) for GZR and 1.86 (1.38-2.51) for EBR. In population modelling of data from C-SURFER, absolute geometric means of steady-state EBR AUC_0-24 were 2.78 and 3.07 μM*h (HD and non-HD recipients) and GZR AUC_0-24 were 1.80 and 2.34 μM*h (HD and non-HD recipients).

CONCLUSIONS

EBR/GZR represents an important treatment option for HCV infection in people with severe renal impairment and those with ESRD. No dosage adjustment of EBR/GZR is required in people with any degree of renal impairment, including those receiving dialysis.

Impact of hepatitis C virus and direct acting antivirals on kidney recipients: a retrospective study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in kidney transplanted patients (KTx-p) carries a high risk for a worse outcome. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of HCV and of the new direct acting antivirals (DAAs) on patient and graft outcomes in KTx patients. Forty (6.5%) of the 616 KTx-p, who received a kidney transplantation (KTx) in our Centre had antibodies against HCV: 13 were positive for HCV RNA and received DAAs (Group A); 11 were HCV RNA positive and did not receive any treatment (Group B; n = 11); 16 were negative for HCV RNA (Group C). All Group A patients had HCV RNA negativity after 12 weeks of treatment, and 12 (92.30%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). Only two patients, who had proteinuria greater than 500 mg/day showed a worsening of proteinuria after antiviral therapy in Group A. Liver enzyme elevation and death were significantly more frequent in Group B than other groups. Our results support the notion that active HCV infection negatively affects kidney recipients and that DAA have a high safety and efficacy profile after KTx with no significant negative effect on allograft function, particularly in well-functioning renal grafts.

Management and treatment of the HCV-infected kidney transplant patient

The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection is increased in patients with end stage kidney disease compared to the general population and is an adverse outcome determinant. Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus is changing the management paradigm of infected kidney transplant candidates and recipients, with potential to reduce patient morbidity and mortality. This review describes the hepatic and nonhepatic manifestations of hepatitis C virus in kidney transplant patients as well as management and treatment strategies to optimize transplant outcomes, highlighting the importance of direct-acting antivirals in this population.

The association of hepatitis C infection with the onset of CKD and progression into ESRD

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not only an important cause of chronic liver disease, but extrahepatic manifestations are common and include chronic kidney disease (CKD). HCV is classically associated with cryoglobulinemic glomerulonephritis in the context of mixed cryoglobulinemia syndrome, but other glomerular diseases also occur and may be significantly under-recognized. HCV may cause glomerular disease by immune complex deposition; however, other potential mechanisms by which HCV promotes CKD include a direct cytopathic effect of the virus on renal tissue, and by its association with accelerated atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, and chronic inflammation. Epidemiologic studies show HCV infection confers an increased risk of incident CKD and accelerates progression of CKD to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the general population, as well as subpopulations including diabetic patients, those coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and kidney transplant recipients. Patients with CKD and HCV infection experience inferior clinical outcomes, including poorer quality of life and an increased risk of mortality. Treatment with interferon-based regimens is associated with decreased risk of incident CKD and ESRD, though prior studies are limited by the small number of patients with HCV and CKD who underwent treatment. With the advent of new, well-tolerated direct-acting antiviral combinations that are not cleared by the kidneys, it is possible to treat all genotypes of HCV infection in patients with CKD and ESRD. More data on the effect of direct-acting antivirals on CKD incidence and progression are necessary. However, there is every expectation that with improved access to HCV treatment, the burden of CKD in patients with HCV could significantly decline.

Hepatitis C and renal transplantation in era of new antiviral agents

Data from World Health Organization estimates that the hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is 3% and approximately 71 million persons are infected worldwide. HCV infection is particularly frequent among patients affected by renal diseases and among those in dialysis treatment. In addition to produce a higher rate of any cause of death, HCV in renal patients and in renal transplanted patients produce a deterioration of liver disease and is a recognized cause of transplant glomerulopathy, new onset diabetes mellitus and lymphoproliferative disorders. Treatment of HCV infection with interferon alpha and/or ribavirin had a poor efficacy. The treatment was toxic, expensive and with limited efficacy. In the post-transplant period was also cause of severe humoral rejection. In this review we have highlighted the new direct antiviral agents that have revolutionized the treatment of HCV both in the general population and in the renal patients. Patients on dialysis or with low glomerular filtration rate were particularly resistant to the old therapies, while the direct antiviral agents allowed achieving a sustained viral response in 90%-100% of patients with a short period of treatment. This fact to date allows HCV patients to enter the waiting list for transplantation easier than before. These new agents may be also used in renal transplant patients HCV-positive without relevant clinical risks and achieving a sustained viral response in almost all patients. New drug appears in the pipeline with increased profile of efficacy and safety. These drugs are now the object of several phases II, III clinical trials.

Role of Direct Antiviral Agents in Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Renal Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of direct antiviral agents (DAAs), morbidity of HCV has considerably decreased but still no guidelines have been formulated in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). We studied efficacy and tolerability of direct antiviral agents in RTRs.

METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted at Army Hospital Research & Referral, Delhi, from June 2016 to May 2017. Forty-five HCV infected RTRs with stable graft function were included.

RESULTS

Median time between renal transplantation and the start of anti-HCV therapy was 36 months (1-120 months). The majority (66.7%) were infected with genotype 3. Baseline median HCV RNA level was 542648 IU/ml (1189-55028534 IU/ml). Sofosbuvir-Ribavirin combination (24 weeks) was given to 30 patients including 3 cirrhotics, Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir combination to 8 patients, and Daclatasvir-Sofosbuvir combination to 7 patients, including 2 cirrhotics. Rapid virological response was observed in 29 patients treated with Sofosbuvir/Ribavirin, all 8 patients on Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir, and all 7 patients on Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir. End treatment response and sustained virological response (12 weeks) were achieved in all patients irrespective of genotype or treatment regimen. Decrease in mean HCV RNA level and transaminase level was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Ribavirin was significantly associated with anaemia (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

DAA regimens are well tolerated and highly efficacious. Response to DAA is good irrespective of genotype, drug combination, initial HCV RNA level, age or sex of patient, or graft age. However, Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir combination is preferable.

Transplant glomerulopathy

In the renal allograft, transplant glomerulopathy represents a morphologic lesion and not a specific diagnosis. The hallmark pathologic feature is glomerular basement membrane reduplication by light microscopy or electron microscopy in the absence of immune complex deposits. Transplant glomerulopathy results from chronic, recurring endothelial cell injury that can be mediated by HLA alloantibodies (donor-specific antibodies), various autoantibodies, cell-mediated immune injury, thrombotic microangiopathy, or chronic hepatitis C. Clinically, transplant glomerulopathy may be silent, detectable on protocol biopsy, or present with overt manifestations, including up to nephrotic range proteinuria, hypertension, and declining glomerular filtration rate. In either case, transplant glomerulopathy is associated with reduced graft survival. This review details the morphologic features of transplant glomerulopathy found on light microscopy, immunofluorescence microscopy, and electron microscopy. The pathophysiology of the causes and risk factors are discussed. Clinical manifestations are emphasized and potential therapeutic modalities are examined.

Hepatitis C Virus Infection and Post-Transplant Diabetes Mellitus among Renal Transplant Patients: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

To examine the association between HCV infection and the occurrence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among renal transplant patients.

Design

Meta-analysis of observational studies.

Data Sources

We retrieved studies published in any language by systematically searching Medline, and Embase and by manually examining the references of the original articles, reviews, and monographs retrieved.

Review Methods

We included cohort and case-control studies reporting relative risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for PTDM occurrence with HCV after renal transplantation. Thirteen studies providing information on a total of 30,099 unique patients were included in our meta-analysis.

Results

Study-specific relative risks were weighted by the inverse of their variance to obtain fixed- and random-effects pooled estimates. The pooled relative risk (RR) for PTDM after RT was 2.73 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.94; 3.83 (10 studies). In a stratified analysis including only large studies (2 studies), the pooled RR was 1.36 (95% CI, 1.21; 1.54). Egger's regression test showed some evidence of publication bias (p=0.0001), but our sensitivity analysis showed that this issue did not meaningfully change the results.

Conclusions

Our study shows a marked increase of the risk of post-transplant diabetes mellitus in anti-hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant recipients. The excess risk of death in hepatitis C virus-positive renal transplant recipients may be at least partially attributed to post-transplant diabetes mellitus with its attendant complications.

Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection in the kidney transplant recipient

Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV) is a common comorbidity in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared with recipients who do not have chronic HCV infection. Because interferon-α-based therapies can precipitate acute rejection, they are relatively contraindicated after kidney transplantation. Thus, the majority of kidney transplant recipients with HCV remain untreated. There are now all-oral, interferon-free direct-acting antiviral therapies for HCV infection that are extremely effective and well tolerated in the general population. Recent reports in the literature demonstrate that direct-acting antiviral therapies effectively cured HCV in 406 of 418 kidney transplant recipients (97%); the majority were treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens. Smaller numbers of kidney transplant recipients have been treated with paritaprevir-ritonavir, ombitasvir and dasabuvir, elbasvir-grazoprevir, or glecaprevir-pibrentasvir with excellent success. Direct-acting antiviral therapies were well tolerated and did not increase the rate of acute rejection. The latest advances include approval of regimens that can treat patients with advanced allograft dysfunction (eGFR < 30 ml/min per 1.73 m²) and "pan-genotypic" regimens that have activity against all 6 major genotypes of HCV. This review summarizes what is known about the epidemiology of HCV infection in kidney transplant recipients, and presents the landscape of direct-acting antiviral therapies and areas in need of further investigation.

De novo immune complex deposition in kidney allografts: a series of 32 patients

Immune complex deposition in kidney allografts can include both recurrent and de novo processes. Recurrent glomerulonephritis is a well-recognized phenomenon and has been shown to be a common cause of allograft failure. De novo immune complex-mediated disease remains relatively poorly characterized, likely owing to the less frequent use of immunofluorescence and electron microscopy in the transplant setting. We performed a retrospective review of kidney allograft biopsies showing glomerular immune complex deposition. Cases with de novo deposits were identified and further organized into two groups depending on whether the immune complex deposition could be clinically and/or histologically classified. Thirty-two patients with de novo immune complex deposition were identified over a 7-year period. A broad range of immune complex-mediated injuries were observed, the majority (63%) of which could be readily classified either clinically or histologically. These included cases of membranous glomerulonephropathy, IgA nephropathy, infection-related glomerulonephritis and glomerulonephritis related to an underlying autoimmune process. A smaller subset of patients (37%) demonstrated immune complex deposition that was difficult to histologically or clinically classify. These patients typically showed mild mesangial immune complex deposition with co-dominant IgG and IgM staining by immunofluorescence microscopy. The presence of concurrent antibody-mediated rejection and donor-specific antibody positivity was significantly higher in the unclassifiable group. The significance of these deposits and their possible relationship to allograft rejection deserves further investigation.

An update on the management of hepatitis C virus-infected patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease while awaiting the revised KDIGO Guidelines

The treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has progressed markedly over the last 2 decades, with a dramatic acceleration the last 3 years. The combination of two or three direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) targeting viral proteins [NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5B nucleos(t)idic and non-nucleos(t)idic polymerase inhibitors, NS5A replication complex inhibitors], with or without ribavirin but without interferon (interferon-free regimen), for 8-24 weeks, achieved high sustained virological response (>90%), whatever fibrosis stage, genotype and subtype, baseline viral load, prior therapeutic history of the patient (naïve or experienced) and pre-existing resistance-associated variants with a fair tolerance and reduced pill burden. International guidelines recommend to ideally treat all infected patients even if a prioritization of the most severe patients (extensive fibrosis or cirrhosis, symptomatic cryoglobulinaemic vasculitis…) appears to be the best cost-effective and urgent policy. Patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) have to be considered as priority patients. Updating of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes recommendations is due to start soon, but awaiting their availability, we present here an overview of recent developments in the field.

Hepatitis C infection in renal transplantation: pathogenesis, current impact and emerging trends

Prevalence of hepatitis C infection, which is associated with mortality and morbidity, is higher in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis and transplant recipients when compared to non HCV infected patients. In addition to the conventional risk factors, HCV infection maybe an additional risk factor in the development of chronic kidney disease. HCV causes adverse effects leading to the poor long term outcome in renal transplant recipients; hepatitis C infection can cause both hepatic as well as extra hepatic complications. Prior evaluation and management of HCV infection is recommended for better long term outcome as there are chances of higher rejection rates with HCV treatment. However transplantation is not contraindicated in those patients who cannot be treated prior to the transplantation as patient survival is better when compared to dialysis patients. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guidelines recommend interferon based therapy only when there is a rapid worsening of HCV related hepatic injury in transplant recipients. HCV treatment has been improved by the addition of direct acting antiviral, protease inhibitors and polymerase inhibitors. Combination therapies are showing improved sustained virological response rates. NS3-4A protease inhibitors, nucleotidic/nucleosidic NS5A and NS5B polymerase inhibitors are promising treatments which are under trials with different combinations. The focus of this review is to evaluate and optimize the treatment options of co-existing HCV infection in renal transplant recipients and discuss more promising alternative treatment regimen.

Use of HCV+ Donors Does Not Affect HCV Clearance With Directly Acting Antiviral Therapy But Shortens the Wait Time to Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent in the renal transplant population but direct acting antiviral agents (DAA) provide an effective cure of HCV infection without risk of allograft rejection.

METHODS

We report our experience treating 43 renal transplant recipients with 4 different DAA regimens.

RESULTS

One hundred percent achieved a sustained viral response by 12 weeks after therapy, and DAA regimens were well tolerated. Recipients transplanted with a HCV+ donor responded equally well to DAA therapy those transplanted with a kidney from an HCV- donor, but recipients of HCV+ organs experienced significantly shorter wait times to transplantation, 485 days (interquartile range, 228-783) versus 969 days (interquartile range, 452-2008; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

On this basis, we advocate for a strategy of early posttransplant HCV eradication to facilitate use of HCV+ organs whenever possible. Additional studies are needed to identify the optimal DAA regimen for kidney transplant recipients, accounting for efficacy, timing relative to transplant, posttransplant clinical outcomes, and cost.

Effect of kidney donor hepatitis C virus serostatus on renal transplant recipient and allograft outcomes

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients and renal transplant recipients and has been associated with diminished patient and allograft survival. HCV-positive (HCV+) kidneys have been used in HCV-positive (HCV+) recipients as a means of facilitating transplantation and expanding the organ donor pool; however, the effect of donor HCV serostatus in the modern era is unknown.

Methods

Using national transplant registry data, we created a propensity score–matched cohort of HCV+ recipients who received HCV-positive donor kidneys compared to those transplanted with HCV-negative kidneys.

Results

Transplantation with an HCV+ kidney was associated with an increased risk of death {hazard ratio [HR] 1.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.76]; P < 0.001} and allograft loss [HR 1.39 (95% CI 1.16–1.67); P < 0.001] compared with their propensity score–matched counterparts. However, HCV+ kidneys were not associated with an increased risk of acute rejection [odds ratio 1.16 (95% CI 0.84–1.61); P = 0.35].

Conclusions

While use of HCV+ donor kidneys can shorten the wait for renal transplantation and maximize organ utility for all candidates on the waiting list, potential recipients should be counseled about the increased risks associated with HCV+ kidney.

Malignancies in hepatitis C virus-positive and -negative kidney transplant recipients: A case-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Malignancies and lymphoma are common complications after kidney transplantation. However, no link has been made between the incidence of malignancies and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in this setting. This case-controlled study compared the incidence of malignancies, including lymphoma, between kidney transplant (KT) patients with or without HCV replication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 99 HCV-positive RNA-positive KT patients were matched with 198 (1:2) anti-HCV-negative patients according to age, gender, and date of transplantation, and were followed for 145.8±78.4 months.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 28 HCV-positive (28%) cases developed at least one cancer, and 64 (32%) patients developed cancer in the HCV-negative group (P=not significant [ns]). Survival without a cancer was similar between both groups. Thirteen HCV-positive patients (13%) developed at least one solid cancer vs 29 (15%) HCV-negative patients (P=ns). Survival without a solid cancer was similar between both groups. Three patients from the HCV-positive and 4 from the HCV-negative group developed a lymphoma. Only 2 patients from the HCV group died from hepatocellular carcinoma. Survival without a skin cancer was similar between both groups. Patient and death-censored graft survival rates were significantly lower in the HCV group.

CONCLUSION

The incidences and types of malignancies were similar in the HCV-positive and HCV-negative KT patients.

Elbasvir plus grazoprevir in patients with hepatitis C virus infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease: clinical, virological, and health-related quality-of-life outcomes from a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In the C-SURFER study, therapy with the all-oral elbasvir plus grazoprevir regimen for 12 weeks in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease resulted in a high rate of virological cure compared with placebo. Here, we report sustained virological response (SVR), safety data, health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL), and virological resistance analyses in patients in C-SURFER who received immediate antiviral therapy or who received placebo before therapy.

METHODS

In this phase 3, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled study, we randomly assigned adults with HCV genotype 1 infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease enrolled at 68 centres worldwide to either elbasvir 50 mg plus grazoprevir 100 mg once per day for 12 weeks (immediate treatment group) or placebo for 12 weeks followed by elbasvir 50 mg plus grazoprevir 100 mg once per day for 12 weeks beginning at week 16 (deferred treatment group). The primary safety and efficacy endpoints for the immediate treatment group and placebo phase of the deferred treatment group have been reported previously. Here, we report safety and efficacy data for the treatment phase of the deferred treatment group, as well as HRQOL assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey for all groups, and baseline and treatment-emergent resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). SVR at 12 weeks (SVR12) was assessed in the modified full analysis set (FAS), defined as all patients excluding those who did not receive at least one dose of study drug, who died, or who discontinued the study before the end of treatment for reasons determined to be unrelated to HCV treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Number NCT02092350.

FINDINGS

Between March 30 and Nov 28, 2014, 235 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug. The modified FAS included 116 patients assigned to immediate treatment and 99 assigned to deferred treatment. 115 (99·1%; 95% CI 95·3-100·0) of 116 assigned to immediate treatment achieved SVR12 compared with 97 (98·0%; 92·9-99·7) of 99 assigned to deferred treatment. In patients with genotype 1a infections, SVR12 was achieved by 11 (84·6%) of 13 patients with detectable baseline NS5A RASs and in 98 (100%) of 98 without. HRQOL did not differ at week 12 between immediate treatment and the placebo phase of deferred treatment. Safety was generally similar between patients receiving immediate treatment and those receiving placebo in the deferred treatment group. One serious adverse event during deferred treatment (interstitial nephritis) and one during the placebo phase of deferred treatment (raised lipase concentration) were deemed related to study drug. Four patients died, one who received immediate treatment (cardiac arrest) and three who received deferred treatment (aortic aneurysm, pneumonia, and unknown cause); all four deaths were considered unrelated to study drugs. Of the three deaths in the deferred treatment group, one occurred during placebo treatment and two occurred before starting active treatment. There were no notable differences in aminotransferase elevations in the deferred treatment group compared with the immediate treatment group, and no patients in the deferred treatment group had total bilirubin elevations.

INTERPRETATION

These data add to the growing body of clinical evidence for the fixed-dose combination regimen of elbasvir plus grazoprevir for 12 weeks and support use of this therapy in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme.

Transplantation of kidneys from hepatitis C-positive donors into hepatitis C virus-infected recipients followed by early initiation of direct acting antiviral therapy: a single-center retrospective study

The availability of direct acting antiviral agents (DAA) has transformed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The current study is a case series that reports the outcomes from a cohort of twenty-five HCV-infected ESRD patients who received a kidney from an anti-HCV-positive deceased organ donor followed by treatment with DAAs in the early post-transplant period. Time to transplantation and the efficacy of DAA therapy as measured by sustained viral response at 12 weeks were assessed. The median waiting time from original date of activation on the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list until transplantation was 427 days; however, the median time from entering the patient into UNet^sm for a HCV-positive offer until transplantation was only 58 days. The 25 patients were started on antiviral treatment early post-transplant (median 125 days) and 24 of 25 (96%) achieved a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. Tacrolimus dose adjustments were required during antiviral treatment in 13 patients to maintain therapeutic levels. Accepting a kidney from an anti-HCV-positive deceased donor shortened the waiting time for HCV-infected kidney transplant candidates. We recommend that kidneys from anti-HCV-positive donors should be considered for transplant into HCV-infected recipients followed by early post-transplant treatment with DAA agents.

The long-term outcomes of hepatitis C virus core antigen-positive Japanese renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND

The impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections on patient long-term survival after renal transplants is unclear.

METHOD

To clarify the long-term outcomes of Japanese renal allograft recipients with HCV infections, we studied the cases of 187 patients (118 males and 69 females; 155 living donor cases, and 32 deceased donor cases; median follow-up period: 250 months) who underwent an initial renal transplant at Kanazawa Medical University from 1974 onwards.

RESULT

In this cohort, 35 patients (18.7%) were HCV core antigen (Ag)-positive, and 13 of them (37.1%) died (due to liver cirrhosis (4 cases), hepatocellular carcinoma (1 case), fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis due to HCV (1 case), and infections complicated with chronic hepatitis (6 cases)). However, only 14 of the 145 (9.7%) recipients died in the HCV-Ag/HCV antibody (Ab)-negative group. The Kaplan-Meier life table method indicated that the HCV-infected group exhibited significantly lower patient and death-censored allograft survival rates (log-rank test; patient survival: Chi-square: 11.2, p = 0.004; graft survival: Chi-square: 25.7, p < 0.001). The survival rate of the HCV-Ag-positive recipients decreased rapidly at 240 months after the renal transplant procedure. In addition, a Cox proportional hazards model indicated that positivity for the HCV-Ag was the most important independent risk factor for post-renal transplant survival and allograft function [survival: hazard ratio (HR) 3.93 (1.54-10.03), p = 0.004; graft function: HR 2.09 (1.14-3.81), p = 0.016].

CONCLUSION

HCV infection is a harmful risk factor for patient survival (especially at ≥20 years post-renal transplant) and renal allograft function in allograft recipients.

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective and well tolerated in postkidney transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C virus

Patients with end-stage renal diseases on hemodialysis have a high prevalence of hepatitis C infection (HCV). In most patients, treatment for HCV is delayed until postrenal transplant. We assessed the effectiveness and tolerance of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in 32 postkidney transplant patients infected with HCV. The group was composed predominantly of treatment-naïve (75%) African American (68.75%) males (75%) infected with genotype 1a (62.5%). Most patients received a deceased donor kidney graft (78.1%). A 96% sustained viral response (SVR) was reported (27/28 patients). One patient relapsed. One patient with baseline graft dysfunction developed borderline rejection. No graft loss was reported. Six HIV-coinfected patients were included in our analysis. Five of these patients achieved SVR 12. There were four deaths, and one of the deaths was in the HIV group. None of the deaths were attributed to therapy. Coinfected patients tolerated therapy well with no serious adverse events. Serum creatinine remained stable at baseline, end of therapy, and last follow-up, (1.351±.50 mg/dL; 1.406±.63 mg/dL; 1.290±.39 mg/dL, respectively). In postkidney transplant patients with HCV infection with or without coinfection with HIV, a combination of LDV/SOF was well tolerated and effective.

Hepatitis C and kidney disease: A narrative review

Hepatitis-C (HCV) infection can induce kidney injury, mostly due to formation of immune-complexes and cryoglobulins, and possibly to a direct cytopathic effect. It may cause acute kidney injury (AKI) as a part of systemic vasculitis, and augments the risk of AKI due to other etiologies. It is responsible for mesangiocapillary or membranous glomerulonephritis, and accelerates the progression of chronic kidney disease due to other causes. HCV infection increases cardiovascular and liver-related mortality in patients on regular dialysis. HCV-infected patients are at increased risk of acute post-transplant complications. Long-term graft survival is compromised by recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis, or chronic transplant glomerulopathy. Patient survival is challenged by increased incidence of diabetes, sepsis, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease, and liver failure. Effective and safe directly acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are currently available for treatment at different stages of kidney disease. However, the relative shortage of DAAs in countries where HCV is highly endemic imposes a need for treatment-prioritization, for which a scoring system is proposed in this review. It is concluded that the thoughtful use of DAAs, will result in a significant change in the epidemiology and clinical profiles of kidney disease, as well as improvement of dialysis and transplant outcomes, in endemic areas.

Hepatitis C Treatment in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Perspective

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a very common infection found among hemodialysis (HD) and kidney transplant patients. It is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have much better efficacy (sustained viral response (SVR)) and tolerance than interferon-based regimens. Very recent studies extend this breakthrough finding to chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations.

SUMMARY

CKD patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m2 can be treated with any licensed DAA regimen. In CKD stages 4-5 (mostly HD), the combination of grazoprevir (100 mg) and elbasvir (50 mg), a once-daily oral regimen active against genotypes 1 and 4, induced in a very recent RCT an SVR rate >95%, with tolerance similar to that of placebo. Case series suggest that other DAA regimens are also very effective and well tolerated in HD patients. In kidney transplant recipients, 2 case series have reported 100% SVR with good tolerance of sofosbuvir-based regimens. Importantly, there is a risk of drug-drug interaction of several DAAs including calcineurin inhibitors. Finally, the availability of HCV+ grafts may markedly shorten the waiting time for transplantation. Key Messages: (1) In patients with an eGFR >30, all licensed DAAs regimens can be used. (2) Cure of HCV appears at hand in CKD stages 4-5, including dialysis patients, and in kidney transplant recipients. (3) The choice of DAA regimen in CKD should be based on HCV genotype, viral load, eGFR, concomitant medications, transplant candidacy and comorbidities. (4) The timing of treatment in potential kidney transplantation candidates (before versus after transplantation) should be decided in collaboration with the transplant center. Video Journal Club 'Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco' at http://www.karger.com/?doi=452730.