Transcription. Dichotomous regulators

Regulation of human ZNF687, a gene associated with Paget's disease of bone

Mutations in Zinc finger 687 (ZNF687) were associated with Paget's disease of bone (PDB), a disease characterized by increased bone resorption and excessive bone formation. It was suggested that ZNF687 plays a role in bone differentiation and development. However, the mechanisms involved in ZNF687 regulation remain unknown. This study aimed to obtain novel knowledge regarding ZNF687 transcriptional and epigenetic regulation. Through in silico analysis, we hypothesized three ZNF687 promoter regions located upstream exon 1 A, 1B, and 1 C and denominated promoter regions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Their functionality was confirmed by luciferase activity assays and positive/negative regulatory regions were identified using promoter deletions constructs. In silico analysis revealed a high density of CpG islands in these promoter regions and in vitro methylation suppressed promoters' activity. Using bioinformatic approaches, bone-associated transcription factor binding sites containing CpG dinucleotides were identified, including those for NFκB, PU.1, DLX5, and SOX9. By co-transfection in HEK293 and hFOB cells, we found that DLX5 specifically activated ZNF687 promoter region 1, and its methylation impaired DLX5-driven promoter stimulation. NFκB repressed and activated promoter regions 1 and 2, respectively, and these activities were affected by methylation. PU.1 induced ZNF687 promoter region 1 which was affected by methylation. SOX9 differentially regulated ZNF687 promoters in HEK293 and hFOB cells that were impaired after methylation. In conclusion, this study provides novel insights into ZNF687 regulation by demonstrating that NFκB, PU.1, DLX5, and SOX9 are regulators of ZNF687 promoters, and DNA methylation influences their activity. The contribution of the dysregulation of these mechanisms in PDB should be further elucidated.

E2F5 promotes prostate cancer cell migration and invasion through regulation of TFPI2, MMP-2 and MMP-9

Previously, our laboratory demonstrated that a deregulated E2F5/p38/SMAD3 axis was associated with uncontrolled cellular proliferation in prostate cancer (PCa). Here, we investigate the role of E2F5 in PCa in further details. RNAi-mediated E2F5 knockdown and pathway-focused gene expression profiling in PC3 cells identified TFPI2 as a downstream target of E2F5. Manipulation of E2F5 expression was also found to alter MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels as detected by Proteome Profiler array, western blot and reverse transcription coupled quantitative polymerase chain reaction Site-directed mutagenesis, dual-luciferase assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation with anti-E2F5-IgG coupled with qPCR confirmed recruitment of E2F5 on TFPI2, MMP-2 and MMP-9 promoters. RNAi-mediated knockdown of E2F5 expression in PC3 caused a significant alteration of cell migration while that of TFFI2 resulted in a modest change. Abrogation of E2F5 and TFPI2 expression was associated with significant changes in the gelatinolytic activity of active forms of MMP-2 and MMP-9. Moreover, E2F5, MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were elevated in biopsies of PCa patients relative to that of benign hyperplasia, while TFPI2 expression was reduced. MMP-9 was coimmunoprecipitated with anti-TFPI2-IgG in PCa tissue samples suggesting a direct interaction between the proteins. Finally, artemisinin treatment in PC3 cells repressed E2F5 along with MMP-2/MMP-9 while triggering TFPI2 expression which alleviated PC3 aggressiveness possibly through inhibition of MMP activities. Together, our study reinstates an oncogenic role of E2F5 which operates as a dual-function transcription factor for its targets TFPI2, MMP-2 and MMP-9 and promotes cellular invasiveness. This study also indicates a therapeutic potential of artemisinin, a natural compound which acts by correcting dysfunctional E2F5/TFPI2/MMP axis in PCa.

Transcriptional regulation of human T-box 5 gene (TBX5) by bone- and cardiac-related transcription factors

T-box 5 (TBX5) protein belongs to the T-box family whose members play a crucial role in cell-type specification, morphogenesis and organogenesis. TBX5 is a transcription factor important for cardiac development and upper limbs formation and its haploinsufficiency causes Holt-Oram syndrome (HOS). An increase in TBX5 dosage also leads to HOS, suggesting that TBX5 is a dose-sensitive transcription factor that needs to be tightly regulated but the molecular mechanisms involved remain unclear. In this work we report the cloning and functional analysis of human TBX5 promoter region 1 (upstream of exon 1) and promoter region 2 (upstream of exon 2), that probably regulate the transcription of the different transcript variants. In silico analysis showed several binding sites for cardiac and skeletal related transcription factors (TFs) and their functionality was assessed using promoter-luciferase constructions and TF-expressing vectors. MEF2A (Myocyte enhancer factor 2 A) was shown to positively regulate both TBX5 promoters, while EGR1 (early growth response 1) repressed both promoters. SOX9 (SRY (sex determining region Y)-box 9) repressed only the activity of promoter region 2. Interestingly, YY1 (Yin and yang 1) repressed promoter region 1 (that regulates the expression of variant 1 and 3), but activated promoter region 2 (that regulates the expression of variant 4). In conclusion, this work provides novel insights toward the better understanding of TBX5 transcriptional regulation by cardiac- and skeletal-related TFs.

A wt1-controlled chromatin switching mechanism underpins tissue-specific wnt4 activation and repression

Wt1 regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in the epicardium and the reverse process (MET) in kidney mesenchyme. The mechanisms underlying these reciprocal functions are unknown. Here, we show in both embryos and cultured cells that Wt1 regulates Wnt4 expression dichotomously. In kidney cells, Wt1 recruits Cbp and p300 as coactivators; in epicardial cells it enlists Basp1 as a corepressor. Surprisingly, in both tissues, Wt1 loss reciprocally switches the chromatin architecture of the entire Ctcf-bounded Wnt4 locus, but not the flanking regions; we term this mode of action "chromatin flip-flop." Ctcf and cohesin are dispensable for Wt1-mediated chromatin flip-flop but essential for maintaining the insulating boundaries. This work demonstrates that a developmental regulator coordinates chromatin boundaries with the transcriptional competence of the flanked region. These findings also have implications for hierarchical transcriptional regulation in development and disease.

Functional characterization of the HD-ZIP IV transcription factor OCL1 from maize

OCL1 (OUTER CELL LAYER1) encodes a maize HD-ZIP class IV transcription factor (TF) characterized by the presence of a homeo DNA-binding domain (HD), a dimerization leucine zipper domain (ZIP), and a steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)-related lipid transfer domain (START) involved in lipid transport in animals but the function of which is still unknown in plants. By combining yeast and plant trans-activation assays, the transcriptional activation domain of OCL1 was localized to 85 amino acids in the N-terminal part of the START domain. Full-length OCL1 devoid of this activation domain is unable to trans-activate a reporter gene under the control of a minimal promoter fused to six repeats of the L1 box, a cis-element present in target genes of HD-ZIP IV TFs in Arabidopsis. In addition, ectopic expression of OCL1 leads to pleiotropic phenotypic aberrations in transgenic maize plants, the most conspicuous one being a strong delay in flowering time which is correlated with the misexpression of molecular markers for floral transition such as ZMM4 (Zea Mays MADS-box4) or DLF1 (DELAYED FLOWERING1). As suggested by the interaction in planta between OCL1 and SWI3C1, a bona fide subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, OCL1 may modulate transcriptional activity of its target genes by interaction with a chromatin remodelling complex.

Cellular factor YY1 downregulates the human papillomavirus 16 E6/E7 promoter, P97, in vivo and in vitro from a negative element overlapping the transcription-initiation site

Cellular factors that bind to cis sequences in the human papillomavirus 16 (HPV-16) upstream regulatory region (URR) positively and negatively regulate the viral E6 and E7 oncogene promoter, P97. DNase I footprinting has revealed the binding of cellular proteins to two previously undetected cis elements overlapping and 3′ of the transcription-initiation site of the P97 promoter. Mutations within homologous motifs found in both of these cis elements abolished their negative function in vivo and the binding of the same cellular complex in vitro. This factor was identified as YY1 by complex mobility and binding specificity in comparison with vaccinia virus-expressed, purified recombinant YY1 protein and by antigenic reactivity with YY1 antisera. Cis mutations in the ‘initiator’ YY1 site activated the P97 promoter in vivo and in vitro. P97 was also activated threefold in vitro by depletion of endogenous YY1 with wild-type, but not mutant, YY1 oligonucleotides from the IgH kappa E3′ enhancer. Furthermore, increasing concentrations of exogenous, purified recombinant YY1 repressed wild-type P97 transcript levels by up to threefold, but did not influence the P97 promoter mutated in the ‘initiator’ YY1 site. Thus, the promoter-proximal YY1 site was not necessary for correct transcription initiation at the P97 promoter, but was found to be required for downregulation of P97 transcription in vivo and in vitro. In contrast to other viral and cellular promoters, where YY1 is thought to function as a positive transcription-‘initiator’ factor, HPV-16 P97 transcription is downregulated by YY1 from a critical motif overlapping the transcription start site.

A microarray model system identifies potential new target genes of the proto-oncogene HOX11

HOX11 is a homeobox gene originally identified at a chromosomal breakpoint in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). It is one of the most frequently deregulated genes in T-ALL, although the precise role of HOX11 in leukemogenesis as well as in normal development remains obscure. To gain more insight into the functional role of HOX11, we utilized a microarray model system to characterize the gene expression network that it directs. Using one of our T-ALL cell lines that had been stably transfected to express HOX11 and high-density oligonucleotide HG-U95A arrays, we identified a large number of differentially expressed genes in response to the enforced expression of HOX11. We focused on examining genes found to be up-regulated according to the microarray analysis and selected three putative target genes, NFKB2, SMARCD3, and NR4A3, for further investigation. We could not only confirm the up-regulation of NR4A3 by an independent method in all clones expressing HOX11, but luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that the effect that HOX11 exerted on the proximal promoter of NR4A3 was dependent on the presence of an intact homeodomain, providing support for the idea that HOX11 manifests its regulatory function via its action as a transcription factor.

Identification, Characterization, and Functional Analysis of Sp1 Transcript Variants Expressed in Germ Cells During Mouse Spermatogenesis1

The SP family of zinc-finger transcription factors are important mediators of selective gene activation during embryonic development and cellular differentiation. SP-binding GC-box domains are common cis-regulatory elements present in the promoters of several genes expressed in a developmentally specific manner in differentiating mouse germ cells. Four Sp1 cDNAs were isolated from a mouse pachytene spermatocyte cDNA library and characterized by DNA sequence analysis. Northern blot studies revealed that these cDNAs corresponded to 3 full-length Sp1 transcripts (4.1, 3.7, and 3.2 kilobases [kb]) and an additional 1.4-kb 5'-truncated Sp1 transcript that are temporally expressed during spermatogenesis. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction studies verified that the highest levels of Sp1 transcript expression of 4.1, 3.7, and 3.2 kb occur in the primary spermatocytes. The spatial and temporal expression patterns of these Sp1 transcripts and their encoded 60-kDa and 90-kDa SP1 proteins were demonstrated using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemical analyses. To assess the transcriptional properties of these SP1 transcription factors, SP-deficient Drosophila SL2 cells were stably transfected with the respective Sp1 cDNA expression vectors and cotransfected with either Ldh2, Ldh3, or Creb promoter/luciferase reporter constructs. The levels of SP-mediated luciferase expression observed depended on the structure of the glutamine-rich transactivation domains and the number of GC-box elements present in the respective promoters. The alterations observed in germ cells in the patterns of expression of the Sp1 transcripts encoding the 60-kDa and 90-kDa SP1 isoforms suggest that these SP1 factors may be involved in mediating stage-specific and cell type-specific gene expression during mouse spermatogenesis.

The 2001 Veylien Henderson Award of the Society of Toxicology of Canada. Positive and negative transcriptional regulation of cytochromes P450 by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Most responses to aromatic hydrocarbons such as 3-methylcholanthrene (MC) and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin are mediated by the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AHR). The AHR regulates induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes such as cytochrome P450 1A1. However, the expression of several genes of biological significance is decreased by these chemicals. We are examining the mechanisms by which aromatic hydrocarbons suppress constitutive hepatic cytochromes P450, especially the male-specific rat liver cytochrome P450 2C11 (CYP2C11), which is regulated by pulsatile growth hormone (GH) secretion. Aromatic hydrocarbons suppress CYP2C11 via a transcriptional mechanism both in vivo and in cultured hepatocytes, and the AHR appears to be involved; however, studies of protein-DNA interactions and reporter genes driven by the CYP2C11 5'-flanking region have not provided a definitive mechanism for this response. MC attenuates the ability of GH to stimulate hepatic CYP2C11 expression in hypophysectomized (hypx) male rats, and this prompted studies of effects of aromatic hydrocarbons on hepatic GH signaling pathways as a novel aspect of endocrine disruption. Our studies with hypx rats also suggest that the hepatic AHR protein is regulated by a pituitary factor(s). The goal of these molecular mechanistic studies is to improve our understanding of how environmental contaminants modulate the expression of genes coding for xenobiotic- and hormone-metabolizing enzymes.

intersex, a gene required for female sexual development inDrosophila, is expressed in both sexes and functions together withdoublesexto regulate terminal differentiation

Previous genetic studies indicated intersex (ix) functions only in females and that it acts near the end of the sex determination hierarchy to control somatic sexual differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. We have cloned ix and characterized its function genetically, molecularly and biochemically. The ix pre-mRNA is not spliced, and ix mRNA is produced in both sexes. The ix gene encodes a 188 amino acid protein, which has a sequence similar to mammalian proteins thought to function as transcriptional activators, and a Caenorhabditis elegans protein that is thought to function as a transcription factor. Bringing together the facts that (1) the ix phenotype is female-specific and (2) functions at the end of the sex determination hierarchy, yet (3) is expressed sex non-specifically and appears likely to encode a transcription factor with no known DNA-binding domain, leads to the inference that ix may require the female-specific protein product of the doublesex (dsx) gene in order to function. Consistent with this inference, we find that for all sexually dimorphic cuticular structures examined, ix and dsx are dependent on each other to promote female differentiation. This dependent relationship also holds for the only known direct target of dsx, the Yolk protein (Yp) genes. Using yeast 2-hybrid assay, immunoprecipitation of recombinant tagged IX and DSX proteins from Drosophila S2 cell extracts, and gel shifts with the tagged IX and DSXF proteins, we demonstrate that IX interacts with DSXF, but not DSXM. Taken together, the above findings strongly suggest that IX and DSXF function in a complex, in which IX acts as a transcriptional co-factor for the DNA-binding DSXF.

Regulation of virus-induced interferon-A genes

Different members of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family are early activated by viral infection of eukaryotic cells. The IRFs participate in the virus-induced transcriptional regulation of different genes, including the multigenic interferon-A (IFN-A) family, members of which are involved in the establishment of an antiviral state, cell growth inhibition or apoptosis. This study presents the recent progress in the field of virus-induced transactivation and repression of IFN-A gene promoters. Data presented on the modular organization of IFN-A gene promoters and their transactivation dependent on IRF-3 and IRF-7 provide a new insight on the cooperativity mechanisms among the different IRF family members. Data on the transcriptional repression of virus-induced interferon-A promoters by the homeodomain protein Pitx1 contribute to our understanding of the complex differential transcriptional activation, repression and antirepression of the IFN-A genes.

Transcription factor RF2a alters expression of the rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter in transgenic tobacco plants

The promoter from rice tungro bacilliform badnavirus (RTBV) is expressed only in phloem tissues in transgenic rice plants. RF2a, a b-Zip protein from rice, is known to bind to the Box II cis element near the TATA box of the promoter. Here, we report that the full-length RTBV promoter and a truncated fragment E of the promoter, comprising nucleotides -164 to +45, result in phloem-specific expression of beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter genes in transgenic tobacco plants. When a fusion gene comprising the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter and RF2a cDNA was coexpressed with the GUS reporter genes, GUS activity was increased by 2-20-fold. The increase in GUS activity was positively correlated with the amount of RF2a, and the expression pattern of the RTBV promoter was altered from phloem-specific to constitutive. Constitutive expression of RF2a did not induce morphological changes in the transgenic plants. In contrast, constitutive overexpression of the b-ZIP domain of RF2a had a strong effect on the development of transgenic plants. These studies suggest that expression of the b-Zip domain can interfere with the function of homologues of RF2a that regulate development of tobacco plants.

Transcription factor AP-2 functions as a repressor that contributes to the liver-specific expression of serum amyloid A1 gene

We previously identified transcription factor AP-2 as the nuclear factor that interacts with the tissue-specific repressor element in the rat serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) promoter. In this report, we provide evidence for a second AP-2-binding site and show that both AP-2 sites participate in mediating the transcription repression of SAA1 promoter. This proximal AP-2 site overlaps with the NFkappaB-binding site known to be essential for SAA1 promoter activity. Protein binding competition experiments demonstrated that AP-2 and NFkappaB binding to these overlapping sites were mutually exclusive. Furthermore, the addition of AP-2 easily displaced prebound NFkappaB, whereas NFkappaB could not displace AP-2. These results thus suggest that one mechanism by which AP-2 negatively regulates SAA1 promoter activity may be by antagonizing the function of NFkappaB. Consistent with a repression function, transient expression of AP-2 in HepG2 cells inhibited conditioned medium-induced SAA1 promoter activation. This inhibition was dependent on functional AP-2-binding sites, since mutation of AP-2-binding sites abolished inhibitory effects of AP-2 in HepG2 cells as well as resulted in derepression of the SAA1 promoter in HeLa cells. In addition to SAA1, we found that several other liver gene promoters also contain putative AP-2-binding sites. Some of these sequences could specifically inhibit AP-2.DNA complex formation, and for the human complement C3 promoter, overexpression of AP-2 also could repress its cytokine-mediated activation. Finally, stable expression of AP-2 in hepatoma cells significantly reduced the expression of endogenous SAA, albumin, and alpha-fetoprotein genes. Taken together, our results suggest that AP-2 may function as a transcription repressor to inhibit the expression of not only SAA1 gene but also other liver genes in nonhepatic cells.

The NF-kappa b repressing factor is involved in basal repression and interleukin (IL)-1-induced activation of IL-8 transcription by binding to a conserved NF-kappa b-flanking sequence element

Interleukin (IL)-8, a prototypic chemokine, is rapidly induced by the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1 but is barely detectable in noninduced cells. Although there is clear evidence that the transcription factor NF-kappaB plays a central role in inducible IL-8 transcription, very little is known about the cis-elements and trans-acting factors involved in silencing of the IL-8 promoter. By sequence comparison with the interferon-beta promoter, we found a negative regulatory element (NRE) in the IL-8 promoter overlapping partially with the NF-kappaB response element. Here we show that an NF-kappaB-repressing factor (NRF) binds to the IL-8 promoter NF-kappaB-NRE. Reduction of cellular NRF by expressing NRF antisense RNA results in spontaneous IL-8 gene expression. In contrast, IL-1-induced IL-8 secretion is strongly impaired by expressing NRF antisense RNA. Mutation of the NRE site results in loss of NRF binding and increased basal IL-8 transcription. On the other hand IL-1-induced IL-8 transcription is decreased by mutating the NRE. These data provide evidence for a dual role of the NRF in IL-8 transcription. Although in the absence of stimulation it is involved in transcriptional silencing, in IL-1-induced cells it is required for full induction of the IL-8 promoter.

Hepatitis C virus NS5A protein modulates transcription through a novel cellular transcription factor SRCAP

Hepatitis C virus NS5A protein transcriptionally modulates cellular genes and promotes cell growth. NS5A is likely to exert its activity in concert with cellular factor(s). Using a yeast two-hybrid screen, we have demonstrated that NS5A interacts with the C-terminal end of a newly identified cellular transcription factor, SRCAP. The authenticity of this interaction was verified by a mammalian two-hybrid assay, in vitro pull-down experiment, and an in vivo coimmunoprecipitation assay in human hepatoma (HepG2) cells. An in vitro transient transfection assay demonstrated that SRCAP can efficiently activate transcription when recruited by the Gal4 DNA-binding domain to the promoter. However, down-regulation of p21 promoter activity by NS5A was enhanced following ectopic expression of SRCAP. Together these results suggest that the interaction of NS5A and SRCAP may be one of the mechanisms by which NS5A exerts its effect on cell growth regulation contributing to hepatitis C virus-mediated pathogenesis.

c-Ski acts as a transcriptional co-repressor in transforming growth factor-beta signaling through interaction with smads

Smads are intracellular signaling mediators of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily that regulates a wide variety of biological processes. Among them, Smads 2 and 3 are activated specifically by TGF-beta. We identified c-Ski as a Smad2 interacting protein. c-Ski is the cellular homologue of the v-ski oncogene product and has been shown to repress transcription by recruiting histone deacetylase (HDAC). Smad2/3 interacts with c-Ski through its C-terminal MH2 domain in a TGF-beta-dependent manner. c-Ski contains two distinct Smad-binding sites with different binding properties. c-Ski strongly inhibits transactivation of various reporter genes by TGF-beta. c-Ski is incorporated in the Smad DNA binding complex, interferes with the interaction of Smad3 with a transcriptional co-activator, p300, and in turn recruits HDAC. c-Ski is thus a transcriptional co-repressor that links Smads to HDAC in TGF-beta signaling.

Changes in muscle mass and phenotype and the expression of autocrine and systemic growth factors by muscle in response to stretch and overload

The study of the underlying mechanisms by which cells respond to mechanical stimuli, i.e. the link between the mechanical stimulus and gene expression, represents a new and important area in the morphological sciences. Several cell types ('mechanocytes'), e.g. osteoblasts and fibroblasts as well as smooth, cardiac and skeletal muscle cells are activated by mechanical strain and there is now mounting evidence that this involves the cytoskeleton. Muscle offers one of the best opportunities for studying this type of mechanotransduction as the mechanical activity generated by and imposed upon muscle tissue can be accurately controlled and measured in both in vitro and in vivo systems. Muscle is highly responsive to changes in functional demands. Overload leads to hypertrophy, whilst decreased load force generation and immobilisation with the muscle in the shortened position leads to atrophy. For instance it has been shown that stretch is an important mechanical signal for the production of more actin and myosin filaments and the addition of new sarcomeres in series and in parallel. This is preceded by upregulation of transcription of the appropriate genes some of which such as the myosin isoforms markedly change the muscle phenotype. Indeed, the switch in the expression induced by mechanical activity of myosin heavy chain genes which encode different molecular motors is a means via which the tissue adapts to a given type of physical activity. As far as increase in mass is concerned, our group have cloned the cDNA of a splice variant of IGF-1 that is produced by active muscle that appears to be the factor that controls local tissue repair, maintenance and remodelling. From its sequence it can be seen that it is derived from the IGF-1 gene by alternative splicing but it has different exons to the liver isoforms. It has a 52 base insert in the E domain which alters the reading frame of the 3' end. Therefore, this splice variant of IGF-1 is likely to bind to a different binding protein which exists in the interstitial tissue spaces of muscle, neuronal tissue and bone. This would be expected to localise its action as it would be unstable in the unbound form which is important as its production would not disturb the glucose homeostasis unduly. This new growth factor has been called mechano growth factor (MGF) to distinguish it from the liver IGFs which have a systemic mode of action. Although the liver is usually thought of as the source of circulating IGF-1, it has recently been shown that during exercise skeletal muscle not only produces much of the circulating IGF-1 but active musculature also utilises most of the IGF-I produced. We have cloned both an autocrine and endocrine IGF-1, both of which are upregulated in cardiac as well as skeletal muscle when subjected to overload. It has been shown that, in contrast to normal muscle, MGF is not detectable in dystrophic mdx muscles even when subjected to stretch and stretch combined with electrical stimulation. This is true for muscular dystrophies that are due to the lack of dystrophin (X-linked) and due to a laminin deficiency (autosomal), thus indicating that the dystrophin cytoskeletal complex may be involved in the mechanotransduction mechanism. When this complex is defective the necessary systemic as well as autocrine IGF-1 growth factors required for local repair are not produced and the ensuing cell death results in progressive loss of muscle mass. The discovery of the locally produced IGF-1 appears to provide the link between the mechanical stimulus and the activation of gene expression.

Functional domains of c-myc promoter binding protein 1 involved in transcriptional repression and cell growth regulation

We initially identified c-myc promoter binding protein 1 (MBP-1), which negatively regulates c-myc promoter activity, from a human cervical carcinoma cell expression library. Subsequent studies on the biological role of MBP-1 demonstrated induction of cell death in fibroblasts and loss of anchorage-independent growth, reduced invasive ability, and tumorigenicity of human breast carcinoma cells. To investigate the potential role of MBP-1 as a transcriptional regulator, a chimeric protein containing MBP-1 fused to the DNA binding domain of the yeast transactivator factor GAL4 was constructed. This fusion protein exhibited repressor activity on the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter via upstream GAL4 DNA binding sites. Structure-function analysis of mutant MBP-1 in the context of the GAL4 DNA binding domain revealed that MBP-1 transcriptional repressor domains are located in the N terminus (amino acids 1 to 47) and C terminus (amino acids 232 to 338), whereas the activation domain lies in the middle (amino acids 140 to 244). The N-terminal domain exhibited stronger transcriptional repressor activity than the C-terminal region. When the N-terminal repressor domain was transferred to a potent activator, transcription was strongly inhibited. Both of the repressor domains contained hydrophobic regions and had an LXVXL motif in common. Site-directed mutagenesis in the repressor domains indicated that the leucine residues in the LXVXL motif are required for transcriptional repression. Mutation of the leucine residues in the common motif of MBP-1 also abrogated the repressor activity on the c-myc promoter. In addition, the leucine mutant forms of MBP-1 failed to suppress cell growth in fibroblasts like wild-type MBP-1. Taken together, our results indicate that MBP-1 is a complex cellular factor containing multiple transcriptional regulatory domains that play an important role in cell growth regulation.

Functional analysis of a transrepressor domain in the hepatitis C virus core protein

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the major causative agents of chronic liver disease with the potential for development of hepatocellular carcinoma. The putative core protein of the virus has many intriguing properties, including transcriptional regulation of cellular and unrelated viral promoters. To further characterize the transregulatory function, a number of chimeric constructs were made by fusion of the core gene to the DNA binding domain of the yeast transactivator factor GAL4. The fusion protein exhibited a repressor activity on the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase promoter via the upstream GAL4 DNA binding sites. A structure /function analysis of HCV core mutants in the context of the GAL4 DNA binding domain revealed that the transcriptional repressor activity was located near the N-terminus (amino acids 26 85). Transcription was strongly inhibited upon transfer of this repressor domain to a heterologous activation domain, (3CGln) of Epstein Barr virus transcription factor EBNA3C. Results from this study suggest that the HCV core protein contains an overall repressor activity, and that the repressor domain is located near the N-terminus.

Differential regulation of basal and cyclic adenosine 3',5'-monophosphate-induced somatostatin gene transcription in neural cells by DNA control elements that bind homeodomain proteins

A number of genes encoding neuropeptides are expressed in the peripheral and central nervous systems, in different endocrine organs, and in specialized cells distributed along the gastrointestinal tract. Whether expression of the same neuropeptide gene in different tissues is regulated by similar transcriptional mechanisms or by mechanisms that differ in a cell-specific manner remains unclear. We report on promoter studies on the regulation of the somatostatin gene in immortalized neural precursor cells derived from developing rat forebrain. Expression of the somatostatin gene in these cells was determined by RT-PCR/Southern blot analysis, by immunocytochemistry, and by RIA. We show that in cerebrocortical and hippocampal cells, expression of the somatostatin gene is regulated by several negative and positive DNA cis-regulatory elements located throughout the promoter region. The somatostatin cAMP-response element appears to play a prominent role in neural somatostatin gene expression by acting as a strong enhancer even in the absence of cAMP stimulation. Site-directed mutagenesis followed by transient transfection assays indicated that SMS-TAAT1, SMS-TAAT2, and SMS-UE, three previously identified homeodomain protein-binding regulatory elements that enhance transcription in pancreatic cells, act as repressors of transcription in neural cells. Electrophoretic mobility shifts assays indicate that those elements bind protein complexes that differ between neural and pancreatic cells. Our results support the notion that expression of the somatostatin gene in neural cells occurs via transcriptional mechanisms that are different from those regulating expression of the same gene in pancreatic cells.

Transcriptional control and the role of silencers in transcriptional regulation in eukaryotes

Mechanisms controlling transcription and its regulation are fundamental to our understanding of molecular biology and, ultimately, cellular biology. Our knowledge of transcription initiation and integral factors such as RNA polymerase is considerable, and more recently our understanding of the involvement of enhancers and complexes such as holoenzyme and mediator has increased dramatically. However, an understanding of transcriptional repression is also essential for a complete understanding of promoter structure and the regulation of gene expression. Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes is achieved through 'silencers', of which there are two types, namely 'silencer elements' and 'negative regulatory elements' (NREs). Silencer elements are classical, position-independent elements that direct an active repression mechanism, and NREs are position-dependent elements that direct a passive repression mechanism. In addition, 'repressors' are DNA-binding trasncription factors that interact directly with silencers. A review of the recent literature reveals that it is the silencer itself and its context within a given promoter, rather than the interacting repressor, that determines the mechanism of repression. Silencers form an intrinsic part of many eukaryotic promoters and, consequently, knowledge of their interactive role with enchancers and other transcriptional elements is essential for our understanding of gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Transcriptional repression by v-Ski and c-Ski mediated by a specific DNA binding site

The Ski oncoprotein has been shown to bind DNA and activate transcription in conjunction with other cellular factors. Because tumor cells or myogenic cells were used for those studies, it is not clear that those activities of Ski are related to its transforming ability. In this study, we use a nuclear extract of c-ski-transformed cells to identify a specific DNA binding site for Ski with the consensus sequence GTCTAGAC. We demonstrate that both c-Ski and v-Ski in nuclear extracts are components of complexes that bind specifically to this site. By evaluating the features of the sequence that are critical for binding, we show that binding is cooperative. Although Ski cannot bind to this sequence on its own, we use cross-linking with ultraviolet light to show that Ski binds to this site along with several unidentified cellular proteins. Furthermore, we find that Ski represses transcription either through upstream copies of this element or when brought to the promoter by a heterologous DNA binding domain. This is the first demonstration that Ski acts as a repressor rather than an activator and could provide new insights into regulation of gene expression by Ski.

Involvement of negative cofactor NC2 in active repression by zinc finger-homeodomain transcription factor AREB6

The transcription factor AREB6 contains a homeodomain flanked by two clusters of Krüppel type C2H2 zinc fingers. AREB6 binds to the E-box consensus sequence, CACCTGT, through either the N- or the C-terminal zinc finger cluster. To gain insights into the molecular mechanism by which AREB6 activates and represses gene expression, we analyzed the domain structure of AREB6 in the context of a heterologous DNA-binding domain by transient-transfection assays. The C-terminal region spanning amino acids 1011 to 1124 was identified as a conventional acidic activation domain. The region containing amino acids 754 to 901, which was identified as a repression domain, consists of 40% hydrophobic amino acids displaying no sequence similarities to other known repression domains. This region repressed transcription in vitro in a HeLa nuclear extract but not in reconstituted transcription systems consisting of transcription factor IID (TFIID), TFIIB, TFIIE, TFIIH/F, and RNA polymerase II. The addition of recombinant negative cofactor NC2 (NC2alpha/DRAP1 and NC2beta/Dr1) to the reconstituted transcription system restored the activity of the AREB6 repression domain. We further demonstrated interactions between the AREB6 repression domain and NC2alpha in yeast two-hybrid assay. Our findings suggest a mechanism of transcriptional repression that is mediated by the general cofactor NC2.

The Xenopus Brachyury promoter is activated by FGF and low concentrations of activin and suppressed by high concentrations of activin and by paired-type homeodomain proteins

The mesoderm of Xenopus laevis arises through an inductive interaction in which signals from the vegetal hemisphere of the embryo act on overlying equatorial cells. One candidate for an endogenous mesoderm-inducing factor is activin, a member of the TGFbeta superfamily. Activin is of particular interest because it induces different mesodermal cell types in a concentration-dependent manner, suggesting that it acts as a morphogen. These concentration-dependent effects are exemplified by the response of Xbra, expression of which is induced in ectodermal tissue by low concentrations of activin but not by high concentrations. Xbra therefore offers an excellent paradigm for studying the way in which a morphogen gradient is interpreted in vertebrate embryos. In this paper we examine the trancriptional regulation of Xbra2, a pseudoallele of Xbra that shows an identical response to activin. Our results indicate that 381 bp 5' of the Xbra2 transcription start site are sufficient to confer responsiveness both to FGF and, in a concentration-dependent manner, to activin. We present evidence that the suppression of Xbra expression at high concentrations of activin is mediated by paired-type homeobox genes such as goosecoid, Mix.1, and Xotx2.

Using altered specificity Oct-1 and Oct-2 mutants to analyze the regulation of immunoglobulin gene transcription

Oct-1 and Oct-2 represent the prototypical example of related transcription factors with identical DNA recognition properties. They bind functionally critical octamer elements found in diverse regulatory sequences. It has not been possible to determine directly if these factors are functionally redundant or selective when interacting with different regulatory sequences in the appropriate cell type. An equivalent pair of altered DNA-binding specificity mutants of Oct-1 and Oct-2 are used to examine their function from varied regulatory contexts in B cells. These factors function as redundant activators of immunoglobulin (Ig) gene promoters (Vkappa and VH) and a histone H2B promoter. The structural basis of redundancy resides in the highly conserved DNA-binding POU domain, because this domain of either protein can activate transcription from both Ig and H2B promoters. We find that the nature of a distal enhancer dictates the relative potency of Oct-1 versus Oct-2 bound to a promoter. Oct-1 preferentially stimulates transcription from a VH or Vkappa promoter in combination with enhancers from the IgH or Igkappa locus, respectively. In this context, the more potent action of Oct-1 is dependent on a region external to the POU domain. These results suggest that Oct-1 may be the critical regulator of Ig gene transcription during B cell development and provide an explanation for selective Ig isotype expression defects in Oct-2 and OCA-B null mice.

Recombination signal sequence binding protein Jkappa is constitutively bound to the NF-kappaB site of the interleukin-6 promoter and acts as a negative regulatory factor

Analysis by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) of the different proteins associated with the kappaB sequence of the interleukin-6 (IL-6) promoter (IL6-kappaB) allowed us to detect a specific complex formed with the recombination signal sequence binding protein Jkappa (RBP-Jkappa). Single-base exchanges within the oligonucleotide sequence defined the critical base pairs involved in the interaction between RBP-Jkappa and the IL6-kappaB motif. Binding analysis suggests that the amount of RBP-Jkappa protein present in the nucleus is severalfold higher than the total amount of inducible NF-kappaB complexes but that the latter bind DNA with a 10-fold-higher affinity. A reporter gene study was performed to determine the functional implication of this binding; we found that the constitutive occupancy of the IL6-kappaB site by the RBP-Jkappa protein was responsible for the low basal levels of IL-6 promoter activity in L929sA fibrosarcoma cells and that RBP-Jkappa partially blocked access of NF-kappaB complexes to the IL-6 promoter. We propose that such a mechanism could be involved in the constitutive repression of the IL-6 gene under normal physiological conditions.

Regulation of a geminivirus coat protein promoter by AL2 protein (TrAP): evidence for activation and derepression mechanisms

Tomato golden mosaic virus (TGMV) is a bipartite member of the subgroup III Geminiviridae. Like all geminiviruses, TGMV replicates in the nucleus of susceptible cells by rolling circle replication (RCR). Double-stranded replicative form DNA generated during RCR serves as template for the transcription of viral genes by RNA polymerase II and the associated cellular transcription machinery. Previous studies in tobacco protoplasts and Nicotiana benthamiana leaf discs have shown that the viral AL2 gene product transactivates expression of the coat protein (CP) and BR1 movement protein genes, and that activation occurs at the level of transcription. Because of its function and properties, we propose the name TrAP, transcriptional activator protein, for the AL2 gene product. Using transgenes consisting of complete and truncated versions of the CP promoter fused to the GUS reporter gene, we show in the studies presented here that TrAP is required for CP gene expression in both mesophyll and phloem tissues. Surprisingly, TrAP appears to induce CP expression by different mechanisms in different cell types: it may activate the CP promoter in mesophyll cells, and acts to derepress the promoter in phloem tissue. In addition, TrAP is clearly capable of inducing the expression of responsive chromosomal promoters and could, in principle, activate host genes. Distinct viral sequence elements mediate expression and derepression in phloem and activation in mesophyll, suggesting that TrAP interacts with different components of the cellular transcription machinery to accomplish CP gene expression in different cell types, and underscoring the intricacy and complexity of virus-host interactions.

The neuron-restrictive silencer element: a dual enhancer/silencer crucial for patterned expression of a nicotinic receptor gene in the brain

The neuron-restrictive silencer element (NRSE) has been identified in several neuronal genes and confers neuron specificity by silencing transcription in nonneuronal cells. NRSE is present in the promoter of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor beta2-subunit gene that determines its neuron-specific expression in the nervous system. Using transgenic mice, we show that NRSE may either silence or enhance transcription depending on the cellular context within the nervous system. In vitro in neuronal cells, NRSE activates transcription of synthetic promoters when located downstream in the 5' untranslated region, or at less than 50 bp upstream from the TATA box, but switches to a silencer when located further upstream. In contrast, in nonneuronal cells NRSE always functions as a silencer. Antisense RNA inhibition shows that the NRSE-binding protein REST contributes to the activation of transcription in neuronal cells.

Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription regulator with modular independent activation and repression domains

Sp3 is a member of the Sp family of transcription factors and binds to DNA with affinity and specificity comparable to that of Sp1. We demonstrate that Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription factor that can both activate and repress transcription. Gene fusion experiments in mammalian cells demonstrate that the Sp3 activation potential is distributed over an extensive glutamine-rich N-terminal region, whereas the repressor activity has been mapped in a 72-amino acid region located at the 5' of the zinc finger DNA-binding domain. We demonstrated that the repression activity is strictly dependent on the context of the DNA-binding sites bound by Sp3. We found that Sp3 represses transcription of promoters bearing multiple GAL4 DNA-binding sites, whereas it activates isogenic reporters containing a single GAL4-binding site. Transfection experiments in Drosophila cells that lack endogenous Sp activity demonstrated that Sp3 does not possess an active repression domain that can function in insect cells, rather it is a weak transcriptional activator of the c-myc promoter. Our results strongly suggest that Sp3 is a dual-function regulator whose activity is dependent upon both the promoter and the cellular context.

Dual-function regulators: the cAMP receptor protein and the CytR regulator can act either to repress or to activate transcription depending on the context

Studies of gene regulation have revealed that several transcriptional regulators can switch between activator and repressor depending upon both the promoter and the cellular context. A relatively simple prokaryotic example is illustrated by the Escherichia coli CytR regulon. In this system, the cAMP receptor protein (CRP) assists the binding of RNA polymerase as well as a specific negative regulator, CytR. Thus, CRP functions either as an activator or as a corepressor. Here we show that, depending on promoter architecture, the CRP/CytR nucleoprotein complex has opposite effects on transcription. When acting from a site close to the DNA target for RNA polymerase, CytR interacts with CRP to repress transcription, whereas an interaction with CRP from appropriately positioned upstream binding sites can result in formation of a huge preinitiation complex and transcriptional activation. Based on recent results about CRP-mediated regulation of transcription initiation and the finding that CRP possesses discrete surface-exposed patches for protein-protein interaction with RNA polymerase and CytR, a molecular model for this dual regulation is discussed.

Pip, a lymphoid-restricted IRF, contains a regulatory domain that is important for autoinhibition and ternary complex formation with the Ets factor PU.1

Pip is a lymphoid-restricted IRF transcription factor that is recruited to composite elements within immunoglobulin light-chain gene enhancers through a specific interaction with the Ets factor PU.1. We have examined the transcriptional regulatory properties of Pip as well as the requirements for its interaction with PU.1 and DNA to form a ternary complex. We demonstrate that Pip is a dichotomous regulator; it specifically stimulates transcription in conjunction with PU.1, but represses alpha/beta-interferon-inducible transcription in the absence of PU.1. Thus, during B-cell activation and differentiation, Pip may function both as an activator to promote B cell-specific gene expression and as a repressor to inhibit the antiproliferative effects of alpha/beta-interferons. Mutational analysis of Pip reveals a carboxy-terminal segment that is important for autoinhibition of DNA binding and ternary complex formation. A domain of Pip containing this segment confers autoinhibition and PU.1-dependent binding activity to the DNA-binding domain of the related IRF family member, p48. On the basis of these and other data we propose a model for PU.1/Pip ternary complex formation.

Transcriptional activation by yeast PDR1p is inhibited by its association with NGG1p/ADA3p

NGG1p/ADA3p forms a coactivator/repressor complex (ADA complex) in association with at least two other yeast proteins, ADA2p and GCN5p, that is involved in regulating transcriptional activator proteins including GAL4p and GCN4p. Using a two-hybrid analysis, we found that the carboxyl-terminal transcriptional activation domain of PDR1p, the primary regulatory protein involved in yeast pleiotropic drug resistance, interacts with the amino-terminal 373 amino acids of NGG1p (NGG1p1-373). This interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged derivatives of NGG1p and PDR1p from crude extracts. An overlapping region of the related transcriptional activator PDR3p was also found to interact with NGG1p. Amino acids 274-307 of NGG1p were required for interaction with PDR1p. This same region is required for inhibition of transcriptional activation by GAL4p. The association between NGG1p1-373 and PDR1p may be indirect, possibly mediated by the ADA complex since the two-hybrid interaction required the presence of full-length NGG1. A partial requirement for ADA2 was also found. This suggests that an additional component of the ADA complex, regulated by ADA2p, may mediate the interaction. Transcriptional activation by a GAL4p DNA binding domain fusion of PDR1p was enhanced in ngg1 and ada2 disruption strains. Similar to its action on GAL4p, the ADA complex acts to inhibit the activation domain of PDR1p.

Glial and muscle embryonal carcinoma cell-specific independent regulation of expression of human JC virus early promoter by cyclic AMP response elements and adjacent nuclear factor 1 binding sites

The human polyoma JC virus (JCV) is a glial cell-specific virus and is the etiological agent for the terminal AIDS-associated brain disease, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). JCV contains several binding sites for transcriptional factors that are important for activity in glial cells, including cyclic AMP (cAMP) response elements (CREs) which are four nucleotides from nuclear factor 1 (NF1) sites within the two 98 bp repeat regions. We studied the combined role of cAMP and NF1 in regulating the expression of the JCV early promoter-enhancer (JCVE) in differentiating glial and muscle P19 embryonal carcinoma cells. JCVE expression remained several-fold higher in the presence of cAMP in glial cells, irrespective of whether the relatively strong activity of JCVE was greatly reduced by NF1 site mutations. In contrast, cAMP had no effect in muscle cells, independent of whether the modest activity of JCVE was two-fold higher due to NF1 site mutations. The in vivo effects were confirmed with in vitro transcription assays using glial cell extracts, competitors of CRE, and the NF1 site, and single repeat JCVE region with mutations in the NF1 II/ III binding sites as templates. The in vitro results also indicated that the effects were due to the CREs of JCV, rather than to the indirect effects of cAMP. Overall, the results indicated that NF1 and cAMP have independent, different, tissue-specific, and direct effects in the regulation of JCVE. These effects may contribute the neurotropic PML-inducing pattern of expression of JCVE.

Mapping of the transcriptional repression domain of the lymphoid-specific transcription factor oct-2A

The lymphoid-specific transcription factor Oct-2a is implicated in B cell-specific transcriptional activity via the octamer motif. Structure/function analysis of various Oct-2a effector regions in the context of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain revealed that Oct-2a contains two functionally different activation domains at the N and the C termini. The transcriptional activity of both domains is strongly potentiated by interactions with distinct B cell-specific coactivators. Recently, we have identified a repression domain located within the N terminus of Oct-2a (amino acids 2-99). When this domain was transferred to a potent activator, transcription was strongly inhibited. In this study we present a deletion analysis of the N-terminal region of Oct-2a to determine the minimal repression domain. We identified a stretch of 23 amino acids, rich in serine and threonine residues, which was responsible for most of the repression activity. We show that repression is strongly dependent on the type of enhancer present in the reporter plasmid as well as on the cell line tested. The possibility that Oct-2a can act as an activator and/or a repressor may have important consequences for the function of Oct-2a in B cell differentiation and other developmental processes.

Repression by HoxA7 is mediated by the homeodomain and the modulatory action of its N-terminal-arm residues

Hox genes encode homeodomain-containing proteins that are presumed to control spatial patterning during murine embryogenesis through their actions as transcriptional regulatory proteins. In this study, we have investigated the transcriptional function of a prototypic member of this family, HoxA7. We demonstrate that HoxA7 function as a potent transcriptional repressor and that its action as such requires several domains, including both activator and repressor regions. The repressor regions are contained within the homeodomain and a C-terminal acidic region, both of which are well conserved among members of the Hox family. Accordingly, we show that two other members of this family also function as repressors, although they vary in their relative repressor potency. Finally, we explore the novel observation that the homeodomain of HoxA7 functions as a transcriptional repressor domain. We show that the homeodomain compared with two other DNA-binding domains, is unique in its ability to function as a repressor domain and that repression requires conserved residues, in helix III. We further show that residues in the N-terminal arm of the homeodomain contribute to the differential repressor actions of various Hox proteins. These findings demonstrate that the transcriptional function of HoxA7 and possibility of Hox proteins in general is determined by their unique combination of conserved and nonconserved regions as well as through the complex actions of their homeodomains.

Repression of the NF1 gene by Tax may expain the development of neurofibromas in human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 transgenic mice

In familial neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), individuals with a germ line-transmitted NF1 mutation develop multiple neurofibromas. To explain the observation that transgenic mice expressing the human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) tax gene under the control of the viral regulatory element also develop multiple neurofibromas, we demonstrate that the Tax trans-regulator can functionally repress NF1 gene expression through a cis-acting element located immediately upstream of its transcriptional start site, thereby allowing the development of benign neurofibromas without the need for direct mutations in NF1. We propose that such a mechanism would suffice to epigenetically alter NF1 gene expression. The fact that transgenic animals have localized rather than diffuse neurofibroma formation, however, suggests that additional genetic or epigenetic events may be required for neurofibroma formation.

Muscle growth and muscle function: a molecular biological perspective

Molecular biological methods are pervading all biomedical fields and it is likely that they will soon introduce new techniques to veterinary diagnostics and have a major impact on food and fibre production in animal agriculture. The ability to manipulate muscle growth and phenotype will present new ethical problems, particularly if the techniques are used to manipulate muscle development in greyhounds and racehorses where the financial rewards could be very substantial. Muscle has been a useful tissue for the study of the molecular control of tissue development because terminal differentiation results in the production of large quantities of highly specialised proteins. Now that the functional anatomy of structural genes in muscle is being elucidated, a coherent picture is beginning to emerge of the way in which post-natal muscle growth and phenotype are regulated at the gene level. The hormones and growth factors involved in regulating the quantitative and qualitative changes in gene expression are now better understood, together with the ability of the tissue to adapt to physical signals and hence new activity patterns. The myosin heavy chain isoform genes which encode the myosin cross-bridges (the force generators for muscular contraction) exist as a large multigene family. The contractility and other characteristics of muscle depend to a large extent on the differential expression of members of this and other gene families. Muscle fibres adapt for increased power output by expressing a subset of "fast' genes and for increased economy of action by expressing a slow subset of genes and producing more mitochondria. With the increasing understanding of gene expression in muscle, there are prospects for manipulating the mass, contractility and other characteristics of muscle and also to change its phenotype and understand certain disease states.

Requirement of a corepressor for Dr1-mediated repression of transcription

A Dr1-associated polypeptide (DRAP1) was isolated from HeLa cells and found to function as a corepressor of transcription. Corepressor function requires an interaction between DRAP1 and Dr1. Heterodimer formation was dependent on a histone fold motif present at the amino terminus of both polypeptides. Association of DRAP1 with Dr1 results in higher stability of the Dr1-TBP-TATA motif complex and precluded the entry of TFIIA and/or TFIIB to preinitiation complexes. DRAP1 was found to be expressed in all tissues analyzed with higher levels in tissues with a low mitotic index. Analysis of DRAP1 in the developing brain of rat demonstrated undetectable levels of DRAP1 in actively dividing cells but high levels of DRAP1 expression in differentiated non dividing cells. Dr1 was immunodetected in all cells analyzed. A model for DRAP1-dependent, Dr1-mediated repression of transcription is proposed.

MafB is an interaction partner and repressor of Ets-1 that inhibits erythroid differentiation

Using a yeast one-hybrid screen with a DNA-bound Ets-1 protein, we have identified MafB, an AP-1 like protein, as a direct interaction partner. MafB is specifically expressed in myelomonocytic cells and binds to the DNA-binding domain of Ets-1 via its basic region or leucine-zipper domain. Furthermore, it represses Ets-1 transactivation of synthetic promoters containing Ets binding sites and inhibits Ets-1-mediated transactivation of the transferrin receptor, which is known to be essential for erythroid differentiation. Accordingly, overexpression of MafB in an erythroblast cell line down-regulates the endogenous transferrin receptor gene and inhibits differentiation without affecting cell proliferation. These results highlight the importance of inhibitory interactions between transcription factors in regulating lineage-specific gene expression.

The GA-binding protein can serve as both an activator and repressor of ribosomal protein gene transcription

The GA-binding protein (GABP), a heterodimeric transcription factor with widespread tissue distribution, has been found to be a strong positive regulator of several ribosomal protein (rp)-encoding genes. In such genes, e.g. the mouse rpL30 gene, the GABP-binding sites are located 40-80 base pairs upstream of the transcriptional start point. Potential GABP-binding sites are present in the promoters of numerous other rp genes, not only in upstream regions, but also in the immediate vicinity of the transcriptional start point. The mouse rpS16 gene is an example of the latter type. We demonstrate here that GABP binds to the rpS16 initiation region, and in so doing down-regulates rpS16 transcription both in vivo and in vitro. Supplementation of cell-free extracts with GABP inhibits transcription on rpS16 templates while concomitantly stimulating transcription on rpL30 templates. The repressive and stimulatory effects, which were proportional to the amount of GABP added, required both the GABP alpha subunit and either a beta1 or beta2 subunit. Mutations of the rpS16 GABP-binding sites that abolish binding increased rpS16 promoter activity in vivo and in vitro, whereas mutations that strengthen GABP binding caused a reduction in promoter activity. The binding of GABP to the rpS16 initiation region does not significantly affect the positioning of the transcriptional start points. Taken together with earlier studies, these new findings indicate that GABP can have a dual role as repressor or activator of rp gene transcription.

UME6 is a central component of a developmental regulatory switch controlling meiosis-specific gene expression

The UME6 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was identified as a mitotic repressor of early meiosis-specific gene expression. It encodes a Zn2Cys6 DNA-binding protein which binds to URS1, a promoter element needed for both mitotic repression and meiotic induction of early meiotic genes. This paper demonstrates that a complete deletion of UME6 causes not only vegetative derepression of early meiotic genes during vegetative growth but also a significant reduction in induction of meiosis-specific genes, accompanied by a severe defect in meiotic progression. After initiating premeiotic DNA synthesis the vast majority of cells (approximately 85%) become arrested in prophase and fail to execute recombination; a minority of cells (approximately 15%) complete recombination and meiosis I, and half of these form asci. Quantitative analysis of the same early meiotic transcripts that are vegetatively derepressed in the ume6 mutant, SPO11, SPO13, IME2, and SPO1, indicates a low level of induction in meiosis above their vegetative derepressed levels. In addition, the expression of later meiotic transcripts, SPS2 and DIT1, is significantly delayed and reduced. The expression pattern of early meiotic genes in ume6-deleted cells is strikingly similar to that of early meiotic genes with promoter mutations in URS1. These results support the view that UME6 and URS1 are part of a developmental switch that controls both vegetative repression and meiotic induction of meiosis-specific genes.

The torso response element binds GAGA and NTF-1/Elf-1, and regulates tailless by relief of repression

Modulation of transcription factor activity leading to changes in cell behavior (e.g., differentiation versus proliferation) is one of the critical outcomes of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) stimulation. In the early Drosophila embryo, activation of the torso (tor) RTK at the poles of the embryo activates a phosphorylation cascade that leads to the spatially specific transcription of the tailless (tll) gene. Our analysis of the tor response element (tor-RE) in the tll promoter indicates that the key activity modulated by the tor RTK pathway is a repressor present throughout the embryo. We have mapped the tor-RE to an 11-bp sequence; using this sequence as the basis for protein purification, we have determined that the proteins GAGA and NTF-1 (also known as Elf-1, product of the grainyhead gene) bind to the tor-RE. We demonstrate that NTF-1 can be phosphorylated by MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase), and that tll expression is expanded in embryos lacking maternal NTF-1 activity; these results make NTF-1 a likely target for modulation by the tor RTK pathway in vivo. The data presented here support a model in which activation of the tor RTK at the poles of the embryos leads to inactivation of the repressor and therefore, to transcriptional activation (by activators present throughout the embryo) of the tll gene at the poles of the embryo.