Cancer incidence in the first-degree relatives of ovarian cancer patients

Epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a complex disease, mostly observed in postmenopausal women, and is associated with poor survival rates. It is the sixth most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of death due to cancer among women in developed countries. Thus, despite representing less than one third of all gynaecologic cancers, deaths due to ovarian cancer account for more than two thirds of deaths due to gynaecologic cancers. Its prevalence is higher in Western Europe and Northern America than Asia and Africa. In sub-Saharan Africa, there is a considerably lower prevalence of ovarian cancer than other parts of Africa. Ovarian cancer is multifaceted, involving many factors, complex biological processes and unpredictable consequences. Unlike other female cancers that have early warning symptoms, ovarian cancer's symptoms are non-specific. As a result, ovarian cancers are normally undetected until advanced stages (III or IV). The major risk factors for ovarian cancer include older age, genetics, family history, hormone replacement therapy, nulliparity, and dietary fat. Controversial factors include obesity, infertility, talc powder, radiation exposure, fertility medications and in vitro fertilization. The current review discusses the aetiology, epidemiology and risk factors for ovarian cancer. Nevertheless, identification of the main risk factors for ovarian cancer may increase the awareness among women of the general population. This should help to decrease the incidence rate of ovarian cancer and increase the five-year survival rate.

Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer after accounting for gynaecological surgery: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Uptake of risk-reducing surgery has increased among women at high risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We sought to characterise familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes in a population-based study after accounting for gynaecological surgeries, including bilateral oophorectomy.

METHODS

We compared risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in relatives of 3536 epithelial ovarian cancer cases diagnosed in 1966-2016 and relatives of 35 326 matched controls. We used Cox competing risk models, incorporating bilateral oophorectomy as a competing risk, to estimate the relative risk of ovarian cancer in first-degree (FDR), second-degree (SDR) and third-degree (TDR) relatives from 1966 to 2016. We also estimated relative risks in time periods before (1966-1994, 1995-2004) and after (2005-2016) formal recommendations were made for prophylactic oophorectomy among women with pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2.

RESULTS

The relative risks of epithelial ovarian cancer in FDRs, SDRs and TDRs of cases versus controls were 1.68 (95% CI 1.39 to 2.04), 1.51 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.75) and 1.34 (95% CI 1.20 to 1.48), respectively. Relative risks were greatest for high-grade serous, mucinous and 'other epithelial' histotypes. Relative risks were attenuated for case FDRs, but not for SDRs or TDRs, from 2005 onwards, consistent with the timing of recommendations for prophylactic surgery.

CONCLUSION

Familial risk of epithelial ovarian cancer extends to TDRs, especially for high-grade serous and mucinous histotypes. Distant relatives share genes but minimal environment, highlighting the importance of germline inherited genetics in ovarian cancer aetiology. Increased ovarian cancer risk in distant relatives has implications for counselling and recommendations for prophylactic surgeries that, from our data, appear only to reach FDRs.

Long-term risk of cancer among the first-degree relatives of epithelial ovarian cancer patients: A cohort study with 48 years of follow up

INTRODUCTION

The long-term risk of cancer among first-degree relatives of ovarian cancer patients, especially their offspring, is of apparent clinical importance. Risks caused by known inherited factors such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic variants are well established, but these account for only about 15% of ovarian cancer cases. Less is known about the possible familial risks of sporadic ovarian cancers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using registry data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study with a total of 6501 first-degree relatives of 559 epithelial ovarian cancer patients. We studied the occurrence of overall cancer and cancer in specific sites known or suspected to be associated with ovarian cancer (breast, cervix, colon, endometrium, lung and trachea, skin melanoma, ovary, pancreas, prostate, rectum, and stomach).

RESULTS

The overall number of cancers was not increased among the first-degree relatives of epithelial ovarian cancer patients during the up to 48 years of follow up. Among female relatives, the standardized incidence ratio for ovarian cancer was 1.92 (95% CI 1.27-2.79), mostly explained by a 2.30-fold (95% CI 1.46-3.45) risk among the patients' sisters. There was a decreasing trend in the standardized incidence ratio for ovarian cancer among patients' sisters by increasing age of the index patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study cohort, we did not observe an increase in the overall cancer risk among the first-degree relatives of epithelial ovarian cancer patients in comparison with the general population. The risk for ovarian cancer, however, was increased. Current recommendations suggest prophylactic removal of the fallopian tubes and ovaries only with identified inherited risk factors. Our results emphasize the role of genetic counseling and testing, particularly in young ovarian cancer patients and their close female relatives.

Robust Tests for Additive Gene-Environment Interaction in Case-Control Studies Using Gene-Environment Independence

There have been recent proposals advocating the use of additive gene-environment interaction instead of the widely used multiplicative scale, as a more relevant public health measure. Using gene-environment independence enhances statistical power for testing multiplicative interaction in case-control studies. However, under departure from this assumption, substantial bias in the estimates and inflated type I error in the corresponding tests can occur. In this paper, we extend the empirical Bayes (EB) approach previously developed for multiplicative interaction, which trades off between bias and efficiency in a data-adaptive way, to the additive scale. An EB estimator of the relative excess risk due to interaction is derived, and the corresponding Wald test is proposed with a general regression setting under a retrospective likelihood framework. We study the impact of gene-environment association on the resultant test with case-control data. Our simulation studies suggest that the EB approach uses the gene-environment independence assumption in a data-adaptive way and provides a gain in power compared with the standard logistic regression analysis and better control of type I error when compared with the analysis assuming gene-environment independence. We illustrate the methods with data from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.

Two sisters with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome and serous adenocarcinoma of the ovary

Background

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome is a rare entity with proposed genetic underpinnings. Ovarian carcinoma has well-described genetic associations and syndromes, although much of the etiology of the disease remains unknown.

Cases

Two sisters present in the 1970s with primary amenorrhea, 46, XX karyotypes, and absent uteri consistent with MRKH syndrome. In the 2010s, both sisters again present for care. Case 1 presents one sister with stage IIIC serous ovarian adenocarcinoma and negative BRCA panel. Case No 2 presents the other sister with stage IIIC serous ovarian adenocarcinoma and a negative panel for 32 genetic variants associated with ovarian carcinoma.

Conclusion

The familial association of two rare diseases and negative genetic workup could point to a new genetic understanding of reproductive structure development and ovarian carcinogenesis.

•

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome can have familial associations.

•

Ovarian carcinoma risk factors include genetic mutations.

•

Rare syndromes with familial associations may have underlying genetic associations.

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Gene Variants and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome-wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT-related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive-cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P-value <0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2 were considered statistically significant. In the larger dataset, GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 was associated with the endometrioid subtype among Caucasians (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07-1.25, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.19), whereas F8 rs7053448 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27-2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), F8 rs7058826 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27-2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), and CAPN13 rs1983383 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69-0.90, P = 0.0005, FDR = 0.12) were associated with combined invasive EOC among Asians. In silico functional analyses revealed that GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 coincided with DNA regulatory elements. These results suggest that EMT gene variants do not appear to play a significant role in the susceptibility to EOC.

Identification of six new susceptibility loci for invasive epithelial ovarian cancer

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 12 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility alleles. The pattern of association at these loci is consistent in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers who are at high risk of EOC. After imputation to 1000 Genomes Project data, we assessed associations of 11 million genetic variants with EOC risk from 15,437 cases unselected for family history and 30,845 controls and from 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers (3,096 with ovarian cancer), and we combined the results in a meta-analysis. This new study design yielded increased statistical power, leading to the discovery of six new EOC susceptibility loci. Variants at 1p36 (nearest gene, WNT4), 4q26 (SYNPO2), 9q34.2 (ABO) and 17q11.2 (ATAD5) were associated with EOC risk, and at 1p34.3 (RSPO1) and 6p22.1 (GPX6) variants were specifically associated with the serous EOC subtype, all with P < 5 × 10(-8). Incorporating these variants into risk assessment tools will improve clinical risk predictions for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Ovarian cancer familial relative risks by tumour subtypes and by known ovarian cancer genetic susceptibility variants

BACKGROUND

Family history is one of the most important risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Little is known, however, on how EOC familial relative risks (FRRs) vary by factors such as tumour subtype or the combined effects of common EOC susceptibility alleles. In addition, no data currently exist on the FRRs associated with EOC after exclusion of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers.

METHODS

EOC FRRs were computed from observed EOCs in relatives of 1548 patients with EOC recruited between 1999 and 2010 from a population-based cohort study with known BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and tumour subtype, compared with the number expected in the general population.

RESULTS

The EOC FRR to all first-degree relatives was estimated to be 2.96 (95% CI 2.35 to 3.72) but there was no evidence of difference in the FRRs for mothers, sisters and daughters. There was significant evidence that the FRR for relatives of patients with EOC diagnosed under age 50 years is higher than that for older patients (4.72 (95% CI 3.21 to 6.95) and 2.53 (95% CI 1.91 to 3.35), p-diff=0.0052) and a suggestion that the FRR in relatives of patients with serous disease is higher than that for non-serous tumours (3.64 (95% CI 2.72 to 4.87) and 2.25 (95% CI 1.56 to 3.26), p-diff=0.0023). The FRR to relatives of cases without a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 was estimated to be over twice that of the general population (2.24 (95% CI 1.71 to 2.94)). BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were estimated to account for about 24% of the EOC FRR to first-degree relatives. FRRs were found to increase with increasing polygenic risk score of the index patient, although the trend was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These estimates could be useful in the counselling of relatives of patients with ovarian cancer.

A detailed study of patients and tumor characteristics of epithelial ovarian cancer in Saudi women

BACKGROUND

The Saudi population is characterized by high parity and intermarriages that may impact ovarian carcinogenesis. Herein, we analyzed the tumor characteristics and outcomes in Saudi patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients with EOC treated at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center during 1995-2007 were identified retrospectively through a review of their medical records. Patients' and tumor characteristics were collected including age at diagnosis, marital status, parity, histology, stage, treatment rendered, and follow-up data.

RESULTS

One hundred-ninety-three patients with EOC were identified in this cohort. The mean age of the patients was 55 ± 15 years, the mean ± SD body mass index was 27.0 ± 5.6 kg/m, and the median parity was approximately 7.0. Whereas 4 patients reported a family history of cancer, 164 women reported negative family history; and it was unknown in 27 cases. Tumor distribution by International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage was the following: 12 patients (6.2%) had stage I disease at diagnosis, 1 patient (0.5%) stage II disease, 130 patients (67.4%) stage III disease, 39 patients (20.2%) stage IV disease, and that of 11 patients (5.7%) was unknown. Information on residual disease after surgery was available on 98 patients with optimal debulking (<1 cm) achieved in 61 cases. Median progression-free survival from end of chemotherapy to recurrence/progression was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval, 9.4-15.2). Tumor histology, size of residual disease, and stage at diagnosis were significant prognostic factors. The patients' age, body mass index, tumor histology, and grade had no impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with advanced-stage disease are higher among Saudis than those reported in global literature. Despite high intermarriage rates, reported family history for related cancers was quite low in this cohort. Notably, this is the first study evaluating EOC in Saudi patients.

Combined and interactive effects of environmental and GWAS-identified risk factors in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

There are several well-established environmental risk factors for ovarian cancer, and recent genome-wide association studies have also identified six variants that influence disease risk. However, the interplay between such risk factors and susceptibility loci has not been studied.

METHODS

Data from 14 ovarian cancer case-control studies were pooled, and stratified analyses by each environmental risk factor with tests for heterogeneity were conducted to determine the presence of interactions for all histologic subtypes. A genetic "risk score" was created to consider the effects of all six variants simultaneously. A multivariate model was fit to examine the association between all environmental risk factors and genetic risk score on ovarian cancer risk.

RESULTS

Among 7,374 controls and 5,566 cases, there was no statistical evidence of interaction between the six SNPs or genetic risk score and the environmental risk factors on ovarian cancer risk. In a main effects model, women in the highest genetic risk score quartile had a 65% increased risk of ovarian cancer compared with women in the lowest [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.48-1.84]. Analyses by histologic subtype yielded risk differences across subtype for endometriosis (Phet < 0.001), parity (Phet < 0.01), and tubal ligation (Phet = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of interactions suggests that a multiplicative model is the best fit for these data. Under such a model, we provide a robust estimate of the effect of each risk factor that sets the stage for absolute risk prediction modeling that considers both environmental and genetic risk factors. Further research into the observed differences in risk across histologic subtype is warranted.

Epigenetic analysis leads to identification of HNF1B as a subtype-specific susceptibility gene for ovarian cancer

HNF1B is overexpressed in clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer, and we observed epigenetic silencing in serous epithelial ovarian cancer, leading us to hypothesize that variation in this gene differentially associates with epithelial ovarian cancer risk according to histological subtype. Here we comprehensively map variation in HNF1B with respect to epithelial ovarian cancer risk and analyse DNA methylation and expression profiles across histological subtypes. Different single-nucleotide polymorphisms associate with invasive serous (rs7405776 odds ratio (OR)=1.13, P=3.1 × 10(-10)) and clear cell (rs11651755 OR=0.77, P=1.6 × 10(-8)) epithelial ovarian cancer. Risk alleles for the serous subtype associate with higher HNF1B-promoter methylation in these tumours. Unmethylated, expressed HNF1B, primarily present in clear cell tumours, coincides with a CpG island methylator phenotype affecting numerous other promoters throughout the genome. Different variants in HNF1B associate with risk of serous and clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer; DNA methylation and expression patterns are also notably distinct between these subtypes. These findings underscore distinct mechanisms driving different epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes.

Ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women using estradiol-progestin therapy - a nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

While previous data link the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy to an increased risk for ovarian cancer, little is known about the impact of various progestins, modes or routes of administration of hormone therapy for this risk. In this nationwide study, we compared relations between different estradiol-progestin (EPT) formulations and epithelial ovarian cancer risk.

METHODS

All Finnish women over 50 years using EPT for at least 6 months (224 015 women with 602 ovarian cancers) during 1994-2006 were identified from the reimbursement register. The incidence of ovarian cancer in EPT users was compared to that in the age-matched background population by means of observed to expected ratio (standardized incidence ratio, SIR).

RESULTS

Ovarian cancer risk was not elevated for EPT use of < 5 years but it was elevated for EPT use of ≥5 years (SIR 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.37). Medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone acetate as components of EPT were associated with similar risks for use for ≥ 5 years (SIR 1.26, 95% CI 0.94-1.64 and SIR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11-1.77, respectively). The risk did not differ between sequential or continuous EPT regimens or between oral or transdermal EPT formulations. The risk elevation for EPT use for ≥ 5 years was seen only for serous (SIR 1.56; 95% CI 1.33-1.80) and mixed cancers (SIR 1.54; 95% CI 1.22-1.91), whereas the risk for mucinous cancer was decreased (SIR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-0.86).

CONCLUSION

The elevated risk of non-mucinous ovarian cancer in users of EPT ≥ 5 years does not depend on progestin type, mode or route of administration of EPT.

Genetic variation in insulin-like growth factor 2 may play a role in ovarian cancer risk

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signaling axis plays an important role in cancer biology. We hypothesized that genetic variation in this pathway may influence risk of ovarian cancer. A three-center study of non-Hispanic whites including 1880 control women, 1135 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and 321 women with borderline epithelial ovarian tumors was carried out to test the association between tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (tSNPs) (n=58) in this pathway and risk of ovarian cancer. We found no association between variation in IGF1, IGFBP1 or IGFBP3 and risk of invasive disease, whereas five tSNPs in IGF2 were associated with risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer at P<0.05 and followed-up one of the associated SNPs. We conducted genotyping in 3216 additional non-Hispanic white cases and 5382 additional controls and were able to independently replicate our initial findings. In the combined set of studies, rs4320932 was associated with a 13% decreased risk of ovarian cancer per copy of the minor allele carried (95% confidence interval 0.81-0.93, P-trend=7.4 × 10(-5)). No heterogeneity of effect across study centers was observed (p(het)=0.25). IGF2 is emerging as an important gene for ovarian cancer; additional genotyping is warranted to further confirm these associations with IGF2 and to narrow down the region harboring the causal SNP.

Coping with ovarian cancer risk: The moderating effects of perceived control on coping and adjustment

OBJECTIVE

Although perceived control and coping have been studied across various health conditions, these relationships have been less well studied in the context of coping with cancer risk over time. The present study was a longitudinal study of the effects of perceived control and problem-focused coping on changes in psychological adjustment and behavioural outcomes among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Eighty women enrolled in a familial cancer risk assessment programme participated in this study. Assessments of problem-focused coping, perceived control and distress were collected upon entry into the programme and again at 3-month follow-up. Behavioural adherence to screening during the 12-month period following programme entry was obtained from clinic records.

RESULTS

Using hierarchical regression analysis, we observed a significant interaction between perceived control and problem-focused coping for psychological distress, beta=0.94, p<.05. Specifically, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress over time among women who perceived high control. A significant control by coping interaction was also observed for behavioural adherence to pelvic ultrasound and CA125 screening, such that women who perceived high control and utilized problem-focused coping were less likely to undergo screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Under conditions of high perceived control, problem-focused coping was associated with increasing distress as well as poorer behavioural adherence. Thus, perceived control and problem-focused coping may not always yield positive psychological or behavioural health outcomes. These findings contribute to a greater understanding of how problem-focused coping and perceived control may influence the course of adjustment to cancer risk over time.

Association between common germline genetic variation in 94 candidate genes or regions and risks of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

Recent studies have identified several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the population that are associated with variations in the risks of many different diseases including cancers such as breast, prostate and colorectal. For ovarian cancer, the known highly penetrant susceptibility genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2) are probably responsible for only 40% of the excess familial ovarian cancer risks, suggesting that other susceptibility genes of lower penetrance exist.

Methods

We have taken a candidate approach to identifying moderate risk susceptibility alleles for ovarian cancer. To date, we have genotyped 340 SNPs from 94 candidate genes or regions, in up to 1,491 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 3,145 unaffected controls from three different population based studies from the UK, Denmark and USA.

Results

After adjusting for population stratification by genomic control, 18 SNPs (5.3%) were significant at the 5% level, and 5 SNPs (1.5%) were significant at the 1% level. The most significant association was for the SNP rs2107425, located on chromosome 11p15.5, which has previously been identified as a susceptibility allele for breast cancer from a genome wide association study (P-trend = 0.0012). When SNPs/genes were stratified into 7 different pathways or groups of validation SNPs, the breast cancer associated SNPs were the only group of SNPs that were significantly associated with ovarian cancer risk (P-heterogeneity = 0.0003; P-trend = 0.0028; adjusted (for population stratification) P-trend = 0.006). We did not find statistically significant associations when the combined data for all SNPs were analysed using an admixture maximum likelihood (AML) experiment-wise test for association (P-heterogeneity = 0.051; P-trend = 0.068).

Conclusion

These data suggest that a proportion of the SNPs we evaluated were associated with ovarian cancer risk, but that the effect sizes were too small to detect associations with individual SNPs.

Hereditary ovarian cancer

At least 10% of ovarian tumors are hereditary and associated with highly penetrant, autosomal, dominant genetic predisposition. Three clinical manifestations of hereditary ovarian cancer have been identified: site-specific ovarian cancer, hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer (HBOC) and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndromes. BRCA germline mutations account for more than 90% of all hereditary epithelial ovarian tumors whereas most of the remaining 10% are caused by MLH1 and MSH2 mutations, which are susceptibility genes of HNPCC. Genetic testing is available for each of the three hereditary syndromes above mentioned. The recommendations for OC surveillance in high-risk women having a strong family history or BRCA mutation carriers include transvaginal pelvic ultrasound with color Doppler and serum CA125 every 6 months. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy appears to be effective to reduce the risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Hysterosalpingo-oophorectomy should be considered in HNPCC women who undergo surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Incidence of ovarian cancer of grand multiparous women—A population-based study in Finland

OBJECTIVES

Parity is known to induce protective effects on ovarian cancer. This study aimed to evaluate how far upon births the protection reaches, the effect of age at first birth, the interval between births in the whole population and the length of time from the first to the last birth and from the last birth to cancer among postmenopausal women.

METHOD

The population-based cohort consisted of 87,929 grand multiparous (GM) women, i.e. women with at least 5 deliveries. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by dividing the number of observed cancer cases by the expected number based on the national incidence rates, both extracted from the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry. Conditional logistic regression for the case-control design nested in the GM cohort was used to estimate proportional hazards by different factors.

RESULTS

The SIR for ovarian cancer among GM women was low (418 cases; SIR 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.69). Further births over five did not give additional protection. The relative risk did not vary significantly by age at first birth or interval between the births in any histological subtype.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ovarian cancer was low in all GM women no matter how many children and at which ages they had delivered or contracted cancer.

Familial clustering of ovarian and endometrial cancers

Data on the association of ovarian cancer with other cancers in families are limited, and no data are available on the involvement of specific morphological types. The nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database on 10.2 million individuals and 19175 invasive ovarian cancers was used to calculate standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for familial ovarian cancer in 0-66-year-old daughters when mothers or sisters were affected. The SIR for concordant ovarian cancers was increased. When the mother or sister had breast cancer, the SIRs were 1.21 and 1.48, respectively; when they had endometrial cancer, the SIRs were 1.45 and 2.53. Multiple myeloma in the mother was associated with a risk of ovarian cancer in the daughter. The risk of endometrioid ovarian cancer was 3.40 in the daughter when the mother presented with endometrial cancer. Our data show a strong familial coupling of ovarian and endometrial cancers, which appears to be specific to the endometrioid morphology.

Familial association of specific histologic types of ovarian malignancy with other malignancies

BACKGROUND

Population-based data on the familial association of specific histologic types of ovarian malignancy with other malignancies are limited. Such data may help to elucidate etiologic differences among histologic types of ovarian malignancy.

METHODS

The nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database, which includes 10.3 million individuals and 20,974 ovarian carcinomas, was used to calculate standardized incidence ratios and 95% confidence intervals for age- and histology-specific ovarian malignancies in women whose parents or siblings were affected with malignancies at the most common disease sites.

RESULTS

Ovarian malignancy was found to be associated with ovarian, laryngeal, breast, endometrial, liver, and colon carcinoma, as well as myeloma; epithelial ovarian malignancy was found to be associated with ovarian, endometrial, and skin malignancies and with melanoma and myeloma; papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma was found to be associated with ovarian and skin malignancies and with myeloma; and endometrioid carcinoma was found to be associated with endometrial, ovarian, and prostate malignancies and with melanoma. For younger women (ages 40-45 years) whose mothers were affected with endometrial malignancies, the risk of developing endometrioid carcinoma was slightly greater than the risk of developing papillary serous cystadenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific types of ovarian malignancy may be associated with specific familial disease sites, with such associations depending on age at diagnosis; the strength of the observed associations varied according to histology. Associations were found between endometrioid carcinoma and endometrial malignancy and between serous carcinoma and Hodgkin disease.

Familial invasive and borderline ovarian tumors by proband status, age and histology

Age-specific familial risks in ovarian cancer have not been assessed by histologic types of medically verified cancers. We used the nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database on 10.2 million individuals and 19,175 invasive and 3,436 borderline ovarian cancers to calculate, by affected family members, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for familial ovarian cancer in 0-66 year old daughters. SIRs for all invasive ovarian cancer were 2.68 (95% CI 2.22-3.21) by ovarian cancer in mother, 2.94 (1.40-5.94) by an affected sister and 24.03 (6.12-74.46) by both an affected mother and sister. The population-attributable fraction from mothers was 2.52%. Seropapillary cystadenocarcinoma showed the highest familial risk, but the effect of histopathol subtype could not be fully assessed because of lack of data in probands. Age-specific data showed some early-onset components and an unusual maximal incidence in the 40s. A comparison to an earlier study on BRCA1/2 mutation analysis and relative risks of ovarian and breast cancer suggests that these mutations could account for 26% of the familial aggregation of ovarian cancer. Histopathology and age of onset appear to be important attributes of familial ovarian cancer, suggesting that further gene identification efforts should target a specific histopathology in early-onset patients.

Subsequent primary malignancies after endometrial carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Population-based data on subsequent neoplasms after women are diagnosed with endometrial and ovarian carcinomas are limited, particularly regarding specific histologic tumor types.

METHODS

The nationwide Swedish Family-Cancer Database of 10.2 million individuals, which includes 19,128 invasive endometrial carcinomas and 19,440 ovarian carcinomas, was used to calculate standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for second primary carcinomas. SIRs were calculated for specific follow-up periods. Data on histopathologic types also were used.

RESULTS

An excess of subsequent malignancies after women were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma was noted at 11 sites. The highest SIRs were recorded for synchronous or metasynchronous ovarian carcinomas (SIR, 55.77; 95% CI, 48.82-63.43) and carcinomas of the small intestines (SIR, 14.71; 95% CI, 4.64-34.59). Primary ovarian carcinoma was followed by an increased risk of developing endometrial carcinoma, and the risks of developing many other malignancies also were increased after women were diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma, including intestinal malignancies, renal cell carcinoma, bladder carcinoma, squamous cell skin carcinoma, connective tissue malignancies, and leukemia. When ovarian endometrioid histology was diagnosed synchronously with primary endometrial carcinoma, the SIR was 140; when endometrial carcinoma was the subsequent neoplasm, the SIR was 87. A small familial component was found in the cooccurrence of endometrial carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data show a strong clustering of endometrial carcinomas and ovarian carcinomas, particularly involving tumors of endometrioid morphology. The patterns of second neoplasms also suggest that hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma may contribute to the association between endometrial and ovarian malignancies. Increased risks for connective tissue tumors and leukemia may signal a response to treatment, and an increased risk for squamous cell skin carcinoma may signal a depressed immune function.

Family history of cancer and risk of ovarian cancer

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between history of cancer in first-degree relatives and ovarian cancer risk. Between 1992 and 1999, we conducted a case-control study in Italy on 1031 women with epithelial ovarian cancer and 2411 women admitted to hospital for acute non-neoplastic conditions. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age and several potential confounders. Overall, 27 cases and nine controls reported a family history of ovarian cancer (OR = 7.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-16). The OR was 23 (95% CI 2.6-212) below age 50 years, based on 10 cases and one control only. The risk of ovarian cancer was also increased in women with a family history of cancer of the stomach (OR = 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.1), intestine (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.4), lung (OR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.0-1.8), breast (OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.7-3.1), lymphomas (OR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.0-5.1) and all sites (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.9). Our results confirm the higher ovarian cancer risk in women with a family history of ovarian and breast cancer, and suggest a few associations with other sites.

The genetics of ovarian cancer

A family history of ovarian cancer confers an increased risk of ovarian cancer. We review the literature quantifying the familial risks associated with ovarian cancer and assess the evidence that the familial clustering of ovarian cancer is genetically determined. We then describe the known high-penetrance genes, the ovarian cancer risks attached to them and their contribution to ovarian cancer in families and in the general population. The evidence for the existence of other ovarian cancer genes is then considered.

Risk assessment & genetic testing

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death in women in Western countries and family history is one of the strongest known risk factors. Approximately 5 to 13% of all ovarian cancer cases are caused by the inheritance of cancer predisposing genes with an autosomal pattern of transmission. The inherited fraction of ovarian cancer may differ between populations. Based on analysis of familial ovarian cancer pedigrees and other epidemiological studies, three hereditary ovarian cancer syndromes have been defined. The identification of the genes responsible for most hereditary ovarian cancers has open a new area of early detection methods and preventive procedures specifically dedicated to women identified as carrying ovarian cancer predisposing genes. Predictive oncology is best performed by a dedicated unit with professionals aware of all the issues surrounding genetic testing.

Risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in young people--a comprehensive literature review

There have been several reports of a rising incidence of oral cancer from many parts of the world. Although it is well known that oral cancer increases with age, recent trends for a rising incidence particularly relates to cancer of the tongue and mouth in young males. This review critically examines 46 publications devoted to oral cancer in the young adult. Most studies suggest that 4-6% of oral cancers now occur at ages younger than 40 years. Several studies examining risk factors for oral cancer in the young provide evidence that many younger patients have never smoked or consumed alcohol, which are recognised risk factors in older groups, or that duration of exposure may be too short for malignant transformation to occur. Information on many aspects of aetiology for this disease in the young implicating occupational, familial risk, immune deficits and virus infection are meagre. The spectrum of genetic abnormality disclosed is similar to older patients, there is paucity of specific studies involving younger cohorts, but predisposition to genetic instability has been hypothesised as a likely cause. Conflicting evidence is also reported on the sex distribution and outcome compared with older patients. Much work is required to understand the caveats related to global demography, risk factors and their diagnostic and prognostic markers for this disease which might be considered a disease distinct from that occurring in older patients.

Nationwide cancer family ascertainment using Finnish Cancer Registry data on family names and places of birth for 35,761 prostate cancer patients

Identification of predisposition loci to complex diseases, such as prostate cancer, requires high-quality family material, the ascertainment of which is often laborious, time-consuming and inaccurate with conventional methods. Here, we describe a new method for rapid, nationwide cancer family ascertainment using Finnish Cancer Registry data on 35,761 prostate cancer cases over a 40-year period. As members of a prostate cancer family are likely to share the same family name and place of birth, we stratified all prostate cancer cases by these 2 parameters (10,721 different names and 596 municipalities). Data were compared with the distribution of family names and places of birth for all 3.3 million Finnish men to derive standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs). A significantly elevated SPR of prostate cancer was detected for 468 (1.6%) of the 28,459 evaluable combinations of family name and place of birth. Of the 20 highest SPR values, 19 corresponded to true nuclear families, most of these having 3 or more affected cases. Two-thirds of our 50 previously established Finnish prostate cancer families were classified among this 1.6% fraction of the highest SPR values. Finally, many of the highest SPR values originated from municipalities in southern and south-western Finland. To explore whether such clusters could highlight local founder effects, we applied genealogical research to link together several families with elevated SPRs and identified an extended family with 20 prostate cancer cases with common ancestors in the early seventeenth century. In summary, a rapid novel method was developed and validated for identification of prostate cancer families from nationwide cancer registry data and for the identification of putative regional founder effects.

Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland

BACKGROUND

The contribution of hereditary factors to the causation of sporadic cancer is unclear. Studies of twins make it possible to estimate the overall contribution of inherited genes to the development of malignant diseases.

METHODS

We combined data on 44,788 pairs of twins listed in the Swedish, Danish, and Finnish twin registries in order to assess the risks of cancer at 28 anatomical sites for the twins of persons with cancer. Statistical modeling was used to estimate the relative importance of heritable and environmental factors in causing cancer at 11 of those sites.

RESULTS

At least one cancer occurred in 10,803 persons among 9512 pairs of twins. An increased risk was found among the twins of affected persons for stomach, colorectal, lung, breast, and prostate cancer. Statistically significant effects of heritable factors were observed for prostate cancer (42 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 29 to 50 percent), colorectal cancer (35 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 10 to 48 percent), and breast cancer (27 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 4 to 41 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Inherited genetic factors make a minor contribution to susceptibility to most types of neoplasms. This finding indicates that the environment has the principal role in causing sporadic cancer. The relatively large effect of heritability in cancer at a few sites suggests major gaps in our knowledge of the genetics of cancer.

Mutation analysis of BRCA1, TP53, and KRAS2 in ovarian and related pelvic tumors

Cancer may be viewed as a genetic disease resulting from critical mutations that disrupt normal cell growth. To characterize the involvement of the BRCA1 and TP53 tumor suppressor genes and of the KRAS2 protooncogene in gynecologic cancer, mutation analysis of these genes was conducted in pelvic tumors of 85 patients that included 49 epithelial ovarian carcinoma cases. The 85 pelvic tumors contained 5 tumors with BRCA1 mutations, 33 with TP53 mutations, and 1 with a KRAS2 mutation. Each of the BRCA1 and KRAS2 mutations, and 25 of the TP53 mutations, were in ovarian carcinomas. Four of the BRCA1 mutations were germline and 1 was somatic. The 4 patients with germline BRCA1 mutations had an early age of disease onset (33-48 years) relative to the mean age of onset (58 years) of all 49 ovarian carcinoma patients, and 3 of these 4 patients had a family history of ovarian or breast cancer. None of the 4 tumors with germline BRCA1 mutations had a KRAS2 mutation or a TP53 mutation, despite a 51% frequency of TP53 mutations in the 49 ovarian carcinomas. Three of the 4 tumors with germline BRCA1 mutations retained a wild-type BRCA1 allele. The tumor with the somatic BRCA1 mutation contained a TP53 mutation and had no evidence for wild-type BRCA1 and TP53 alleles. These data suggest that both BRCA1 and TP53 were inactivated in 1 of 49 ovarian carcinomas. Moreover, mutational inactivation of both BRCA1 and TP53 did not occur in 4 tumors with a germline BRCA1 mutation. It has been proposed that tumorigenesis in cells with a heterozygous BRCA1 mutation requires inactivation of the wild-type BRCA1 and TP53 alleles, which results in genomic instability and acquisition of mutations in protooncogenes. Clearly, mutational inactivation of TP53 and the wild-type BRCA1 allele in ovarian tumors with a heterozygous, germline BRCA1 mutation is not an absolute requirement for tumor formation. It is possible that these alleles may be inactivated by nonmutational mechanisms or that other tumor formation pathways exist.

Familial cancers in a nationwide family cancer database: age distribution and prevalence

We calculated sex- and age-specific familial relative risks (FRRs) of cancer in offspring of cancer probands at 19 male and 20 female cancer sites, based on the nationwide Family Cancer Database from Sweden. The proportion of familial cancers among all cancers was also determined. The database contained 550,000 primary cancers. The familial risk at known sites: colon, breast, ovary, testis, skin (melanoma), nervous system, thyroid and other endocrine glands were confirmed. The FRR of thyroid cancer exceeded any other cancer and was over twice as high for male as for female offspring, and appeared to constitute an early- and late-onset component. Novel register-based findings were familial risks in cervical and uterine cancer, and in male offspring of male probands kidney and skin (mainly squamous cell) cancer. Familial risks were noted also for lung cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia but they may have largely environmental causes. The proportion of familial cancers depended on the site, ranging from 11% in prostate to 8.7% in female breast and to well below 1% at many sites.

Familial cancer risks in offspring from discordant parental cancers

Analysis of familial cancer risks between discordant sites provides etiologic understanding on genetic and environmental risks factors of site-specific cancers. We used the Swedish nation-wide Family-Cancer Database to analyze familial risks in discordant cancers of offspring and parents. Familial risk ratios (FRRs) were calculated for cancer in offspring aged 15 to 53 years at 22 sites, discordant from parental sites. We confirmed many reported associations. Consistent novel findings associated parental-offspring sites of pancreas-breast, breast-testis and uterus-nervous system. For these, the FRRs were modest, 1.2 to 1.5 in the whole Database, but the FRRs increased in those whose parents were diagnosed before age 50. Pancreas and liver cancers showed FRRs of 2.5 to 3.3 in offspring of women and of 1.3 in offspring of men. One or both of these cancers was/were associated with cancers of stomach, colon, breast, uterus, ovary and prostate. Melanoma was associated with pancreas, breast, skin and nervous-system cancers and with leukemias. Myeloma showed a concordant FRR of about 4.0 and was associated with prostate cancer and non-thyroid endocrine-gland cancers. Mutations in known cancer-related genes may explain some of these findings, but new susceptibility genes are yet to be found. For melanoma, pancreatic and liver cancer, environmental factors are important etiologic factors and may contribute to the familial effects observed.

Age-specific familial risks in common cancers of the offspring

Quantitative data on familial cancer risks are important for clinical, psychological and scientific reasons. The available estimates carry many uncertainties due to sample size and possible bias in data collection and often refer to first-degree relatives of unspecified age and sex. We calculated sex- and age-specific familial hazard ratios (FHRs) of cancer in offspring aged 15-53 years of cancer probands at 16 male and 17 female cancer sites, based on registered nation-wide data, free from bias. The familial risks in offspring were high, > 5 for thyroid (FHR 10.7 in all offspring, CI 95% 6.9-16.6), and testicular cancer (FHR 5.4, CI 95% 2.6-11.3), or intermediate, FHR 2-5, for colon, rectal, lung, breast, cervical, uterine, ovarian, skin (melanoma and squamous cell) and other endocrine gland cancers. FHRs < 2.0 were observed for stomach, renal and nervous system cancers, lymphomas and leukemias. Some sex differences were observed: FHRs for male breast (only 2 cases) and thyroid cancers were over 2 times higher than the respective female ones. When parents were diagnosed before age 50 years, offspring were at an increased risk of familial breast, renal, skin (melanoma), nervous system, thyroid and non-thyroid endocrine gland cancers, particularly affecting young (< 40 years) individuals. The parental diagnostic age also affected offspring's risk of colon, rectal, uterine and ovarian cancers, but young individuals were not at a particular risk. No effect of age was noted for cervical cancer and lymphoma.

Segregation analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer in Finland

Epithelial ovarian cancer is known to aggregate in families. The dominantly inherited ovarian cancer predisposing genes, BRCA1, BRCA2 and genes involved in the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome, have recently been identified. However, in the majority of families with more than one case of ovarian cancer, dominant inheritance cannot be recognized. We investigated familial clustering of epithelial ovarian cancer in a population-based sample of 663 Finnish ovarian cancer patients. A segregation analysis with the POINTER software was conducted on the 937 nuclear families from these 663 pedigrees. The major gene model was favoured, and the sporadic and multifactorial models were strongly rejected. In the studied population, the best fitting model was a recessive mode of inheritance, and 8% of ovarian cancer patients were estimated to be homozygous for the deleterious genotype. This evidence for recessively inherited ovarian cancer predisposition should be interpreted cautiously, as the analysis is subject to certain errors, which are discussed in the article. Results of this analysis, however, strongly emphasize the role of genetic factors in all familial aggregation of epithelial ovarian cancer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of family history and risk of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the relative risk and lifetime risk of ovarian cancer in women with various categories of family history.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis of all published case-control and cohort studies.

METHODS

Pooled relative risk estimates were calculated for the case control studies, using the Mantel-Haenzel method. These estimates were combined with the relative risks from the cohort studies. The pooled estimates of relative risk were used to estimate lifetime risks of ovarian cancer from age 15 up to age 75, for various categories of family history.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relative risks and lifetime risks of developing ovarian cancer were calculated for the categories of women with 1. an affected first degree relative; 2. an affected mother; 3. an affected sister; and 4. women with more than one affected relative.

RESULTS

The relative risk to first degree relatives is 3.1 (95% CI 2.6-3.7). There is some evidence that this relative risk declines with age. The relative risk to mothers of cases 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.6) was lower than the relative risks to sisters: 3.8 (95% CI 2.9-5.1), and daughters: 6.0 (95% CI 3.0-11.9); the explanation of this difference is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with a family history of ovarian cancer have a substantially higher risk of developing ovarian cancer compared with women without such a history. However the risk is small for most categories of family history, except for the small number of individuals who have more than one affected relative.

A missense mutation in the BRCA2 gene in three siblings with ovarian cancer

Inherited susceptibility to ovarian cancer has been associated with germline defects at several loci. The major known ovarian cancer susceptibility gene is BRCA1 on chromosome 17q, which confers a risk of approximately 60% by the age of 70 years. Truncating mutations in BRCA2 on chromosome 13q also predispose to ovarian cancer, although they confer a lower risk than mutations in BRCA1. We have studied the molecular basis of ovarian cancer predisposition in a Finnish family with three affected sisters. Analysis of polymorphic markers provided evidence against linkage to BRCA1, but the sibship was consistent with linkage to BRCA2. Conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis was used to screen the entire coding sequence of BRCA2. A G to A transition at nucleotide 8702 was observed, which is predicted to convert glycine 2901 to aspartate in the encoded protein. This sequence variant was not detected in 220 cancer-free Finnish control individuals, or in several hundred cancer families of many nationalities previously screened for BRCA2 mutations. Taken together with the fact that this amino acid residue and the surrounding region of BRCA2 is identical in mouse and chicken, the data suggest that this alteration is a disease-causing BRCA2 missense mutation. Previously published data indicate that the risks of breast and ovarian cancer conferred by BRCA2-truncating mutations varies with the position of the mutation in the gene. The missense mutation reported here suggests that the BRCA2 domain including and surrounding glycine 2901 may be more important in preventing neoplastic transformation in ovarian epithelium than in breast epithelium.

Immunohistochemically detected p53 and HER-2/neu expression and nuclear DNA content in familial epithelial ovarian carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Some epithelial ovarian carcinomas tend to occur more frequently in certain families. This clustering may be due to a genetic predisposition, but the role of inherited susceptibility in all families with multiple cases of ovarian carcinoma is currently unresolved. Studies characterizing familial ovarian carcinomas are few.

METHODS

From a population-based study of 559 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma, 27 families with 2 or more ovarian carcinoma cases occurring in first-degree relatives were identified. Histopathology, ploidy, and immunohistochemically detected p53 and HER-2/neu expression in these tumors were examined.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients with familial ovarian carcinoma was 56.7 years. Approximately 67% of the tumors were either serous or undifferentiated adenocarcinomas. The percentage of aneuploid tumors was 46%, that of p53 positive tumors was 51%, and that of HER-2/neu positive tumors was 69%. When the families were divided into families with cases of breast carcinoma in addition to ovarian carcinoma cases and/or ovarian carcinoma in 2 consecutive generations (12 families) and families with ovarian carcinoma occurring in sisters only without cases of breast carcinoma (15 families), no differences were noted in the frequency of any of the studied variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Familial ovarian carcinomas do not appear to differ from sporadic ovarian carcinomas with regard to patient age at presentation, histopathology, ploidy, and immunohistochemically detected p53 expression. Immunohistochemically detected HER-2/neu expression was found to occur more frequently in familial ovarian carcinomas than has been reported in sporadic ovarian carcinomas.