Adjuvant chemotherapy after gastric resection in node-positive cancer patients: a multicentre randomised study

A predictive signature for oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil based chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy(AC) plays a substantial role in the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC), but the response remains poor. We aims to improve its efficacy in LAGC. Therefore, we identified the expression of eight genes closely associated with platinum and fluorouracil metabolism (RRM1, RRM2, RRM2B, POLH, DUT, TYMS, TYMP, MKI67) in the discovery cohort (N=291). And we further validated the findings in TCGA (N=279) and GEO. Overall survival (OS) was used as an endpoint. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were applied. A multivariate Cox regression model was simulated to predict the OS. In the discovery cohort, the univariate Cox model indicated that AC was beneficial to high-RRM1, high-DUT, low-RRM2, low-RRM2B, low-POLH, low-KI67, low-TYMS or low-TYMP patients, the results were validated in the TCGA cohort. The multivariate Cox model showed consistent results. Cumulative analysis indicated that patients with low C-Score respond poorly to the AC, whereas the high and medium C-Score patients significantly benefit from AC. A risk model based on the above variables successfully predicted the OS in both cohorts (AUC=0.75 and 0.67, respectively). Further validation in a panel of gastric cancer cell (GC) lines (N=37) indicated that C-Score is significantly associated with IC50 value to fluorouracil. Mutation profiling showed that C-Score was associated with the number and types of mutations. In conclusion, we successfully simulated a predictive signature for the efficacy of AC in LAGC patients and further explored the potential mechanisms. Our findings could promote precision medicine and improve the prognosis of LAGC patients.

•

We successfully simulated a predictive signature for the efficacy of chemotherapy in LAGC patients and a GC cell line panel.

•

We further explored the potential mechanisms that it may be associated with the number and type of mutations.

•

Our findings could promote precision medicine and improve the prognosis of LAGC patients.

Survival Benefit of Three Different Therapies in Postoperative Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

Purpose: Gastric cancer is mainly treated by gastrectomy, the results of which were unsatisfactory without any adjuvant treatments. This study aimed to examine the performance of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy after surgery in order to acquire the optimal adjuvant treatment. Method: Embase and PubMed were retrieved to conduct a systematic research. Hazard ratios (HR) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as outcomes were calculated by synthesizing direct and indirect evidence to evaluate the efficacy of three treatments against surgery alone. The P-score ranking was utilized to rank the therapies. Consistency was assessed by heat plot. Begg's test was performed to evaluate publication bias. Results: A total of 35 randomized controlled studies (RCTs) with 8973 patients were included in our network meta-analysis (NMA). As for efficacy outcomes, OS and PFS of 1, 2, 3, and 5 years, all revealed chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the best of three adjuvant therapies. Meanwhile, P-score ranking results also displayed that CRT was the optimal regimen. Additionally, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) were two alternative options following CRT since RT performed well in short-term survival while CT could improve the long-term survival. Conclusion: CRT was the most recommended therapy to accompany surgery according to our results. However, no analysis about the safety of these three treatments was mentioned in our study. Further studies including safety outcomes were required to draw a more comprehensive conclusion.

A Pilot Clinical Trial of Postoperative Intensive Weekly Chemotherapy Using Cisplatin, Epi-Doxorubicin, 5-Fluorouracil, 6S-Leucovorin, Glutathione and Filgrastim in Patients with Resected Gastric Cancer

Aims and background

The study was performed to assess the feasibility and activity of an intensive chemotherapeutic regimen as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected gastric cancer at high risk of recurrence (PT2N1-2; pT3-4Nany M0).

Patients and methods

Starting 21 to 28 days after potentially curative surgery for primary gastric cancer, 25 patients received 8 weekly cycles of cisplatin 40 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epidoxorubicin 35 mg/m2, 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin at a dose of 250 mg/m2, and glutathione at a dose of 1.5 g/m2. From the day after to the day before each cycle of chemotherapy, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 μg/kg.

Results

After a median follow-up of 33 months, 80% of the patients were alive and disease-free. Five patients had relapsed: three in the liver, one in the peritoneum and one in the lymph nodes. Toxicity was mild: five patients experienced WHO grade III toxicity (three leukopenia, two thrombocytopenia); no toxic deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Intensive weekly chemotherapy is a feasible postoperative treatment option for patients with resected gastric cancer at high risk of relapse. These data, together with recent results in advanced disease, make this approach of interest for the development of new programs of adjuvant therapy in this setting.

Validity of studies suggesting postsurgical chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer: critical appraisal of randomised trials

Background and aim

In 2013, Diaz-Nieto et al published a Cochrane review to summarise the impact of postsurgical chemotherapy versus surgery alone on survival for resectable gastric cancer. The authors concluded that postsurgical chemotherapy showed an improvement in overall survival. The aim of this article was to assess the validity of four studies included in the Cochrane review and to investigate the impact of an exclusion of these four studies on the result of the meta-analysis.

Methods

Overall survival was selected as endpoint of interest. Among the 34 included papers which analysed this endpoint, we identified the four publications which have the highest weights to influence the final result. The validity of these papers was analysed using the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist for randomised controlled trials. We performed a new meta-analysis without the four studies in order to assess their impact on the general result of the original meta-analysis.

Results

The analysed four studies revealed several inconsistencies: inappropriate answers were found in up to 77% of the items of the CONSORT checklist. Unclear or inadequate randomisation, missing blinded set-up, conflict of interest and lacking intention-to-treat analysis were the most common findings. When performing a meta-analysis excluding the four criticised studies, postsurgical chemotherapy still showed a significant improvement in overall survival. Even when excluding all single studies with a statistically significant outcome by themselves and performing a meta-analysis on the remaining 26 studies, the result remains statistically significant.

Conclusion

The four most powerful publications in the Cochrane review show substantial deficits. We suggest a more critical appraisal regarding the validity of single studies. However, after the exclusion of these four studies, the result of the meta-analysis did not change.

Postoperative chemo-radiotherapy versus chemotherapy for resected gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (direct and indirect) of published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of postoperative chemo-radiotherapy (ChRT) with chemotherapy (Ch) on overall and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with resectable gastric cancer.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and CENTRAL from the date of inception and annual meeting proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology from 1999 to November 2012 for RCTs comparing postoperative ChRT with Ch, postoperative ChRT with surgery alone and postoperative Ch with surgery alone. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included DFS and toxicity. Hazard ratios (HRs), confidence intervals (CIs) and P values (P) were estimated with fixed effects models using Revman 5.1.

RESULTS

We found six trials comparing postoperative ChRT with Ch (n = 1171). Meta-analysis of direct comparison trials showed that postoperative ChRT significantly improved both OS (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.98, P = 0.03) and DFS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.91, P = 0.003) when compared with Ch. There were no significant differences in toxicity between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a survival benefit of postoperative ChRT over Ch in patients with resected gastric cancer.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review up-to-date clinical data published in the literature in regard to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer after radical surgical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and CBMDisc were searched to identify data published regarding this issue from 1966 to 2013. All the calculations and statistical tests were done using RevMan5.2 software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 trials with 8580 patients met all inclusion criteria. Among them, 27 studies reported survival rates at the end of follow-ups, 64.2% alive among 3981 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm and 57.3% alive among 4027 patients in the observation arm. Statistical results showed that the observation arm had a shorter disease-free survival (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15), and the treatment arm had a lower recurrence rate (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.84). Leucopenia, anemia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia and infection occurred more frequently in the treatment arm. Adjuvant chemotherapy decreased the occurrence of peritoneum relapse [RR = 0.77, 95% CI (0.66-0.90)], lymphoid nodes relapse [RR = 0.58, 95% CI (0.45-0.75)] and local relapse [RR = 0.57, 95% CI (0.41-0.80)].

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the survival rate and disease-free survival rate and reduce the relapse rate after curative resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot induce thrombocytopenia and mucositis or affect liver function. The tumor in situ recurrence and peritoneum, lymph nodes relapse decrease after chemotherapy, and patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy regardless of the numbers of positive lymph node, depth of local invasion, Asian or non-Asian, the length of follow-up, and numbers of cycles.

Multidisciplinary management of gastric cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of gastric cancer has been rapidly evolving with the emergence of new cytotoxic drugs and targeted biologic agents. The purpose of this review is to provide an update in the treatment of localized and metastatic gastric cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the overall incidence of gastric cancer has been declining in the United States, the disease continues to be a devastating problem worldwide. Complete surgical resection offers the chance of cure for localized gastric cancer. However, local and distant recurrences are common. Adjuvant chemoradiation with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin significantly improves disease-free survival and overall survival as demonstrated by the US Intergroup INT-116 study. Most recently, the UK Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric trial showed survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation have also been explored in several small randomized studies with encouraging results. However, this approach needs to be further confirmed in a large randomized phase III study. Finally, novel molecular targeting agents have been incorporated into the multimodality treatment and shown promising response rate and progression-free survival.

SUMMARY

Gastric cancer remains one of the most clinically challenging cancers among all gastrointestinal malignancies. Mutimodality approach clearly offers survival benefit over surgery alone. In the United States, preoperative chemoradiation or postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation is widely practiced in major centers.

Adjuvant FOLFOX-4 in patients with radically resected gastric cancer: Tolerability and prognostic factors

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the FOLFOX-4 regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer after radical surgery. Fifty-four patients (1 stage Ib, 6 stage II, 22 stage IIIa, 14 stage IIIb and 11 stage IV) received 8-12 cycles of FOLFOX-4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), Day 1; leucovorin 100 mg/m(2) i.v., Days 1 and 2; 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus, Days 1 and 2 and 600 mg/m(2) in 22 h i.v. continuous infusion, Days 1 and 2; every 14 days). Toxicity was recorded at each cycle according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Thirty-eight patients (70.4%) completed the prescribed number of cycles of chemotherapy. The toxicity was mild. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 57% of patients, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 2% of cases. Peripheral neuropathy was experienced by 46% of the patients (grade 4 in 2% of cases). Five patients experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. After a median follow-up of 33.1 months, 17 patients relapsed and 17 succumbed to the disease. The mean observed DFS and OS were 49.7 months (range 40.7-58.8) and 57.9 months (range 49.6-66.2), respectively. At univariate analysis, females and patients who had received <8 cycles of chemotherapy had a significantly worse probability of DFS and OS. The Cox model showed gender to be independent of the factors affecting DFS. Adjuvant FOLFOX-4 is feasible and well-tolerated in patients radically resected for gastric cancer. Receiving <4 months of adjuvant FOLFOX-4 could be detrimental to prognosis.

Upper gastrointestinal tumors: current status and future perspectives

Recent therapeutic developments that have provided new promising and successful approaches to the treatment of solid tumors are in large part due to the increasing understanding of their molecular biology. Despite this progress, these new therapies have provided minimal benefit in the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Hence, the overall survival of patients with upper GI tumors remains dismal. These disappointing results are largely due to the lack of early detection strategies, inadequate medical treatments and the poor understanding of upper GI tumor biology. Clinically, the treatment paradigm has been evolving for these malignancies. Esophageal cancer is now commonly treated with preoperative chemoradiation in the USA, in both academic and community cancer centers, due to its theoretical advantages. Adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation are also frequently used in patients with pancreatic cancer. Exciting prospects remain in the medical and surgical treatment of these malignancies with the inclusion of biologic agents in many protocols, newer chemotherapeutic agents (such as S-1 in the treatment of gastric cancer), and the use of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of premalignant and, possibly, early malignant lesions of the esophagus and stomach. This review focuses on the current practice in the management of upper GI tumors and summarizes the recent advances in the field.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluorinated pyrimidines for curatively resected gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of centrally randomized controlled clinical trials in Japan

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer has been extensively explored in Japan since the 1950s, and a combination of oral fluorinated pyrimidines (o-FP) and mitomycin C (MMC) has been mainly utilized for adjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no sufficient evidence for the efficacy of adjuvant therapy. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy of o-FPs over surgery alone (control) by means of a meta-analysis of Japanese centrally randomized controlled clinical trials conducted between 1980 and 2005. For inclusion in this study, studies had to compare adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected gastric cancer with surgery alone, mainly targeting o-FP, and central randomization designed to comply with contemporary standards for clinical trials in Japan. For the 4 trials that met the eligibility criteria, the estimated hazard ratio was 0.73 (95%CI=0.60-0.89). Our findings show that in Japan adjuvant chemotherapy using o-FP for long-term maintenance therapy appears to be effective for gastric cancer patients after curative resection.

The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy following curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

To evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival rates after curative resection of gastric cancer, MEDLINE (1969-2006), EMBASE (1974-2006), bibliographies, and review articles were searched for relevant articles. The meta-analysis was finally based on 15 trials that included 3212 patients. RR for death in the treated group was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96) (P = 0.0010). Little or no significant benefits were suggested in subgroup analyses between different population and regimens either. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer confers slightly significant benefits compared to the surgery only group. The prognoses after surgery may differ among various population groups or because of different regimens.

An updated meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether and how much gastric cancer patients after curative resection could benefit from chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Meta-analysis was conducted with all the qualified clinical randomized trials which compared adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. The database includes MEDLINE, EMBase and CBM disc, and the censor data were up to November 2007. Primary outcomes were relative risk (RR) on death and disease-free survival (DFS); secondary outcomes include RR of adverse reactions of the two arms. Sub-group analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed. All the calculations and statistical tests were done with the RevMan 4.2.8 software.

RESULTS

Finally, 23 trials which included 4919 patients (2441 in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm, 2478 in the observation arm) achieved all the criteria. Among them, 19 studies reported the survival rate at the end of follow-up, 60.6% alive among 2286 patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy arm, 53.4% alive among 2313 patients in the observation arm, with the RR on death of 0.85 (95%CI: 0.80-0.90). Eight studies reported the DFS, and the observation arm had a shorter DFS (RR: 0.88, 95%CI: 0.77-0.99). Grade 3/4 of myelosuppression and GI toxicity occurred more frequently in the treatment arm. Nine studies reported the recurrence rate and suggested that the treatment arm had a lower recurrence rate (RR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.71 approximately 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically, adjuvant chemotherapy could improve the survival rate and disease-free survival rate in gastric cancer after curative resection and reduce the relapse rate. However, the clinical benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy still need to be improved. Additionally, post-operative chemotherapy could be tolerated.

Adjuvant and preoperative therapy for localized gastric cancer

Although the incidence of gastric cancer has been declining in the United States, the disease continues to pose a devastating problem worldwide. Complete surgical resection offers the only chance of cure for localized gastric cancer. The recommended extent of surgical lymphadenectomy has been debated for some time, but no consensus has emerged. Unfortunately, local and distant recurrence are frequent, and long-term survival remains low. Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trials have shown mixed results, with no consistent overall survival benefit. The Gastric Cancer Intergroup Trial 0116 demonstrated that adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin significantly improves disease-free and overall survival. More recently, the MAGIC trial showed a survival benefit with perioperative chemotherapy. Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy have also been explored in phase II studies, with encouraging results; however, the potential benefits of these approaches need to be assessed in phase III trials. Biologic agents are beginning to be incorporated into multimodality treatment and have shown promising results thus far.

Evaluation of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer using life expectancy compared with log-rank test as a measure of survival benefit

BACKGROUND

The goal of radical cancer surgery with or without adjuvant therapy is to cure disease rather than to delay death. There is concern that the survival benefit of curative treatment may not be properly appreciated by the log-rank test (LRT), which is more sensitive to treatment that delays death than to treatment that achieves cure. To confirm this concern and to evaluate the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, the data from a previous randomized controlled trial are analyzed using both traditional and new methods.

METHODS

In this trial, 1410 gastric cancer patients with serosal or subserosal invasion had been classified by nodal and serosal status into four strata and randomized to receive high-dose or low-dose adjuvant regimens (mitomycin and tegafur-uracil) after gastrectomy. The two treatment groups were compared using the LRT as well as the life expectancy (LE) derived from the Boag model and the competing risk model.

RESULTS

The LRT showed no significant difference between the two groups, whereas the LE increased significantly with high-dose chemotherapy (1.4-year gain; 95% CI = 0.1-2.8). A greater gain of 4.4 years occurred exclusively in the serosa-negative node-positive stratum, associated with a 21% increase in cure rate. The gain in LE was particularly greater in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Parametric LE analysis offers more relevant information about curative treatment than LRT. It suggests that high-dose chemotherapy may achieve cure in a subset of patients, eradicating residual malignancies left behind after gastrectomy and providing greater survival benefit than expected from LRT.

Postoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer after potentially curative surgery has been under clinical investigation for more than four decades. However, potentially curative resection can be performed in only 30%-50% of patients. The objective of this article is to review briefly the clinical trials available in the current literature using adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer after potentially curative surgical resection.

METHODS

Computerized (MEDLINE) and manual searches were performed to identify papers published on this topic between 1965 and 2005. Only articles with an English abstract were reviewed for inclusion; information abstracted included histologic proof of diagnosis, number of patients, dose and modality of treatment, survival duration, and side effects.

RESULTS

Forty-three reports were identified. Single-agent chemotherapy was evaluated in four clinical trials, and postoperative combination chemotherapy was evaluated in 33 trials. Furthermore, we identified five meta-analyses. Five-year survival rates ranged from 12%-91.2%, and the median survival durations were 13-60+ months. Adjuvant chemotherapy, when compared with surgery alone, seems to result in longer survival.

CONCLUSION

The high rate of recurrence, even in patients undergoing state-of-the art curative resection, suggests that effective adjuvant chemotherapy might indeed be an attractive concept to improve the overall outcome of patients with gastric cancer. However, because there is no standard regimen for postoperative treatment at the moment, patients with R0-resected (no residual tumors) gastric cancer should be offered the opportunity to participate in prospective clinical trials.

A review of adjuvant therapy for resected primary gastric cancer with an update on Taegu's phase III trial with intraperitoneal chemotherapy

AIMS

Because patients with advanced gastric cancers have less than 50% chance of cure after R0 resection, the need for an adjuvant treatment to eradicate residual microscopic disease is clear. The major treatment strategy during the last decades has been postoperative systemic therapy. The results of published trials were reviewed. And, perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy as an adjuvant to potentially curative surgery was evaluated.

METHODS

A literature search on this topic was performed for articles relating to clinical trials using adjuvant chemotherapy in the management of gastric cancer. Subset analyses of Taegu's phase III trial of early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy were performed.

RESULTS

Even after extended lymphadenectomy, the peritoneal surface and resection site had a high incidence of recurrence. Postoperative systemic chemotherapy treatment regimens available in the past showed no major improvement in survival. One of new approaches currently undergoing study was intraperitoneal chemotherapy given in the perioperative period. The Taegu data showed this treatment reduced the incidence of peritoneal recurrence and thereby improved the survival rate after potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The eradication of micrometastatic foci in the peritoneal cavity can be achieved by the perioperative intraperitoneal administration of chemotherapeutic agents. Patients with serosa-positive gastric cancer are most likely to benefit from adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer

Although the incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing, it remains a significant source of cancer-related mortality. Surgery remains the best chance for cure from gastric cancer. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy have played increasing roles in attempting to reduce the disease-specific mortality and prolong survival. In this article, the authors review the literature and summarize the salient points regarding the roles of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers and one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related deaths. The incidence, diagnostic studies, and therapeutic options have undergone important changes in the last decades, but the prognosis for gastric cancer patients remains poor, especially in more advanced stages. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of this disease, even if it is associated with a high rate of locoregional and distant recurrence. There is ongoing debate regarding the role of adjuvant treatment In advanced disease, palliation of symptoms, rather than cure, is the primary goal of patient management. Several combination therapies have been developed and have been examined in phase III trials; however, in most cases, they have failed to demonstrate a survival advantage over the reference arm. This review summarizes the most important recommendations for the management of patients with gastric cancer.

Perioperative adjunctive treatment in the management of operable gastric cancer

Outcome in the management of clinically resectable gastric carcinoma has been disappointing, at least in Western populations, despite increasingly radical surgery and extensive experience with adjunctive perioperative treatment with innumerable single and combined modality regimens. The United States Intergroup Study, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation, demonstrated significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival. Consequently, this regimen of postoperative fluoruracil plus leucovorin and locoregional radiation has been incorporated into current clinical practice. In hopes of further improving cure rates, many other regimens are under investigation, including the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy alone, combined neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy alone. In these clinical trials, therapeutic agents are prescribed alone or in multimodal regimens and include systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with or without hyperthermia, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative external beam irradiation. Several molecular markers have been identified, which seem to predict that a given tumor may be effective or resistant to a drug, raising the possibility of customized chemotherapy regimens. Preclinical studies suggest potential efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and antisense agents.

Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil (PELF) combination versus 5-fluorouracil alone as adjuvant chemotherapy in curative resected stage III gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The combination of cisplatin, epirubicin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (PELF) administration, as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer, was compared with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration alone. This paper reports the results of a prospective randomized comparison of the two regimens, PELF and 5-FU.

METHODS

From August 1996 to July 1999, 54 patients were selected subsequent to being diagnosed with stage III cancer after a curative resection for gastric cancer. The patients were stratified according to stage IIIA/IIIB and subtotal/total gastrectomy, and then they were randomized into each treatment group, i.e. the PELF or 5-FU alone groups.

RESULTS

54 assessable patients were enrolled in this study: 28 received PELF and 26 received 5-FU alone. 12 patients relapsed in each group and the median follow-up duration was 42 months (range: 10 approximately 77 months). The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate (DFS) were not significantly different between two groups, (5-year survival of PELF vs. 5-FU: 57% vs. 64%, 5-year DFS: 54% vs. 51%). The PELF combination was more toxic in terms of anemia, anorexia, nausea and diarrhea than the 5-FU.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the PELF combination, as an adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer after a curative resection, was a less effective treatment, and it had more toxic effects than the 5-FU.

Gastric cancer: advances in adjuvant and adjunct therapy

Patients with gastric carcinoma remain at high risk for local and systemic relapses, even after a successful surgery (R0 resection). To reduce the rate of relapse and increase cure rates, several clinical adjuvant trials have been reported. Only a few studies have reported positive results and most have failed to demonstrate any benefit for the treated patients. The trials with positive results from chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy have not gained global acceptance. The Intergroup 0116 trial has gained acceptance in North America, but it has not been accepted globally. In North America, where gastric surgery is often less than optimal, the Intergroup 0116 trial has provided evidence of benefit in overall survival time and time-to-cancer progression for patients treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. This trial recruited 556 patients with resected gastric cancer from stage IB through IV and an R0 resection was mandatory for registration. The results of this trial have spurred many other studies and controversies. In our opinion, all of the patients in the West who have had a curatively resected node-positive gastric carcinoma (R0 resection) should be offered an option of receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy.

Chemotherapy in gastric cancer: a review and updated meta-analysis

The five years survival rate for patients with gastric cancer is 15-25%. With the aim of improving survival, chemotherapy has been used in different adjuvant settings. Similarly, but with the aim of improving quality of life and prolonging life, chemotherapy has been used extensively in metastatic disease. In this review we have included studies of systemic and intraperitoneal chemotherapy given before, during or after operation and for advanced disease. A meta-analysis has been made on the 21 randomised studies that used adjuvant systemic chemotherapy postoperatively. A significant survival benefit for the patients treated postoperatively compared with controls was identified (odds ratio (OR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.96). When western and Asian studies were analysed separately we found no survival benefit for the treated patients in the western groups (OR 0.96 (95 CI 0.83 to 1.12)). Flaws in the conduct of several trials made it difficult to draw firm conclusions, including the exclusion of a small but clinically meaningful survival benefit. Preoperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy has shown effects in some patients, but no significant benefit was found in the few randomised studies. The few studies that reported intraperitoneal therapy showed no detectable survival benefit either. In patients with advanced disease, four small randomised studies found significantly longer survival in the treated patients. The survival benefit is in the range of 3-9 months, and there were also improvements of the quality of life. Several drug combinations have been tested, however, with no confirmed superiority for a particular regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy cannot be recommended as a routine because of the lack of confirmed beneficial effects. Some patients with advanced disease will have a clinically important benefit from palliative chemotherapy, so this can be recommended for patients who are otherwise in good health.

Curative treatment of gastric cancer: towards a multidisciplinary approach?

Despite marked decreases in incidence over the last century, particularly in developed countries, gastric cancer is still the second-most common tumor worldwide. Surgery remains the gold standard for the cure of locoregional disease. However, in most countries, the diagnosis is made at an advanced stage, and the 5-year survival for surgically resectable disease stays far below 50%. The efficacy of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy in addition to surgery has been actively studied over the last 30 years. Unfortunately, with few exceptions, most studies of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer have given deceiving results. The purpose of this review is to address the reasons for our failure to objectivate an improvement in the cure of gastric cancer with adjuvant treatment in most trials, and to consider potential solutions. The low efficacy of chemotherapy regimens available up to now may have hampered our progress. In addition, many previous studies suffered limitations of design or methodology (e.g. low accrual, inadequate disease stage selection, inadequate surgical treatment) that may have obscured a treatment effect. Furthermore, the reduced treatment tolerance of post-gastrectomy patients, perhaps due to their poor nutritional status, results in decreased or delayed adjuvant systemic therapy, with potential adverse consequences in its efficacy. Among potential solutions, the arrival of new drugs, taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors in particular, which have shown encouraging results in metastatic disease, may increase the impact of chemotherapy in a multidisciplinary treatment approach. Pre-treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy prior to surgery may also be advantageous, averting the problems associated with post-surgical treatment. Such an approach has been shown to be feasible in phase II studies, and is relatively well tolerated by patients. Several carefully designed randomized phase III trials are underway to answer this question.

Intravenous chemotherapy for resected gastric cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of different intravenous chemotherapeutic regimens in patients with gastric carcinomas who had undergone gastrectomy.

METHODS: A meta-analysis of all the relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Language was restricted to Chinese and English. RCTs were identified from Medline and Embase (1980-2001/4), and Chinese Bio-medicine Database (1990-2001/1). Literature references were checked at the same time. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials comparing the efficacy of intravenous chemotherapy after gastrectomy with that of surgery alone in patients with confirmed gastric carcinomas who had undergone gastrectomy. Selection criteria were: randomized or quasi-randomized trials with following-up results; Trials could be double-blind, single-blind or not blind; Chemotherapy groups were given intravenous chemotherapy after gastrectomy without neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, radiotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy; Controlled group included those receiving gastrectomy alone. The following data were extracted: the number of survival and death by the end of the follow-up; the different agents and doses of the intravenous chemotherapy; the baseline of the chemotherapy group and the controlled arm; the serious adverse events; the statistical consideration; cost-effectiveness analysis. The statistical analysis was performed by RevMan4.1 software which was provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Meta-analysis was done with random effects model. Heterogeneity was checked by chi-square test. Sensitivity analysis was performed by excluding the trials in which Jadad-scale was only 1 score. The result was expressed with odds ratio (OR) for the categorical variable.

RESULTS: Fourteen trials involving 4543 patients were included. Meta-analysis was done with random effects model Heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis were performed also. The effect of intravenous chemotherapy after gastrectomy was better than surgery alone (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.40-0.79). There was a significant difference between the two groups by u-test (P = 0.0008). Sensitivity analysis revealed the same difference (odds ratio 0.81, 95%CI 0.70-0.94). Of fourteen trials, only three studies were of high quality according to the Jadad-scale (with three score). There was one meta-analysis trial and the others, about ten trials, were of low quality. There was no trial which mentioned sample-size calculation, allocation concealment, intention-to-treat analysis. Most of the trials didn’t describe the blind-procedure. There were five trials which detailed the side-effects according to the toxicity grade by WHO standard. The side-effects halting treatment were haematologic and biochemical toxicity, debilitating nausea and vomiting. There were two patients died of chemotherapy toxicity.

CONCLUSION: Based on the review, intravenous chemotherapy after gastrectomy may have positive treatment effect on gastric cancer. However, the evidence is not strong because of the general low methodologic quality of the RCTs. Therefore, we can’t make the conclusion that intravenous chemotherapy after gastrectomy may have better treatment effect on gastric cancer than that of surgery alone. Rigorously designed, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required.

Efficacy of adjuvant immunochemotherapy with OK-432 for patients with curatively resected gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of centrally randomized controlled clinical trials

The benefit of immunochemotherapy employing a streptococcal preparation, OK-432 (Picibanil), in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer was reassessed by meta-analysis of data from 1,522 patients enrolled in six clinical trials with central randomization. All six trials began between 1985 and 1993, and patients were followed-up for at least 3 years after surgery and enrollment of the last patient. In these trials, standard chemotherapy was compared with the same chemotherapy plus OK-432. The endpoint was overall survival and intent-to-treat analysis was done without patient exclusion. Data were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The 3-year survival rate for all eligible patients in the six trials was 67.5% in the immunochemotherapy group versus 62.6% in the chemotherapy group. The 3-year overall survival odds ratio was 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.65-0.99). The treatment effect was shown to be statistically significant (p = 0.044). The results of this meta-analysis suggest that immunochemotherapy after surgery with OK-432 can improve the survival of patients with curatively resected gastric cancer.

Adjuvant and preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide, and the risk of relapse remains high in the majority of patients undergoing resection. Attempts to reduce this risk and prolong survival have led to numerous adjuvant chemotherapy trials that either had no benefit for patients or occasionally had controversial results. The recently reported Intergroup 0116 trial shows conclusive evidence of survival benefit for patients treated with postoperative chemoradiotherapy. In this Intergroup trial, which involves over 600 patients, a regimen of postoperative chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy was shown to prolong overall and disease-free survival in gastric cancer patients with stage IB through IV disease following a curative (R0) resection. This approach should be considered the standard of care in patients with gastric cancer who have undergone curative resection. Preoperative chemotherapy shows promise in downstaging tumors and increasing the rate of curative resection, but randomized trials are needed to assess survival benefits. Efforts to combine existing treatment modalities and new agents with novel mechanisms of action hold promise for the future.

Adjuvant therapy for resected gastric carcinoma

Despite its continued decline over the past 40 years, gastric carcinoma is a common gastrointestinal cancer and a major health problem around the world. In Asian countries, such as Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and China, it remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related death. Similarly, it is a common malignancy in many South American countries, Eastern European countries, and many countries of the former Soviet Union. In North America, the incidence of gastric carcinoma is low; however, the incidence of proximal gastric carcinoma has risen over the past 15 years. In 2001, approximately 21,700 new cases and 12,800 deaths were estimated in the United States as a result of gastric carcinoma. In the United States, gastric cancer ranks 14th among all cancers in incidence rate and 10th in overall mortality rate. An early detection program has been established in Japan, where nearly 6,000,000 adults are screened annually. This type of mass screening for gastric cancer is not practiced elsewhere, however. Because the risk of relapse remains high for patients after a curative resection, there is a great need for effective adjuvant therapy for patients with gastric carcinoma.

Adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer: a reality at last

Gastric cancer remains a significant healthcare problem throughout the world and is usually diagnosed at a fairly advanced stage in the West. Despite complete resection of the primary tumor, most patients eventually experience a relapse and die of recurrent disease. Extended surgery has not been shown to improve survival in Western studies. There have been a large number of adjuvant chemotherapy trials over the past several decades, most with negative results. More recently, there is hope for improving these dismal results with a meta-analysis showing a benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy and a large randomized trial, INT-0116, which has just reported a significant survival advantage with combined chemoradiation. These results make adjuvant therapy for completely resected gastric carcinoma the new standard of care, except in the uncommon setting of early intramucosal cancers.

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomised trials. A study of the GISCAD (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dei Carcinomi dell'Apparato Digerente)

BACKGROUND

Several studies have investigated the possible role of the adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer failing to show a clear indication; previous meta-analyses suggested small survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, but the statistical methods used were open to criticisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomised trials were identified by means of Medline and CancerLit and by selecting references from relevant articles. Systematic review of all randomised clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer compared with surgery alone, published before January 2000, were considered. Pooling of data was performed using the fixed effect model. Death for any cause was the study endpoint. The hazard ratio and its 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), derived according to the method of Parmar, were the statistics chosen for summarising the relative benefit of chemotherapy versus control.

RESULTS

Overall 20 articles (21 comparisons) were considered for analysis. Three studies used single agent chemotherapy, seven combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with anthracyclin, ten combination of 5-FU without anthracyclines. Information on 3658 patients, 2180 deaths, was collected. Chemotherapy reduced the risk of death by 18% (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI: 0.75-0.89, P < 0.001). Association of Anthracyclines to 5-FU did not show a statistically significant improvement when compared with the effect of the other regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy produces a small survival benefit in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer. However, taking into account the limitations of literature based meta-analyses, adjuvant chemotherapy is still to be considered as an investigational approach.

The role of chemotherapy in the management of gastric cancer

Despite a marked decline in the incidence of gastric carcinoma in Western countries, the majority of patients presents with advanced inoperable tumors. In this setting, usually the aim of therapy is palliation, with the exception of chemotherapy administered in the attempt to downstage the tumor and to facilitate potentially curative surgery in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic disease. This review will focus on the use of chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer and after curative surgery, providing an overview of future directions for clinical research: preoperative (neoadjuvant) systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal treatment, and newer drugs.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant mitomycin plus tegafur in patients with resected stage III gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is controversial. We conducted a phase III, randomized, multicentric clinical trial with the goal of assessing the efficacy of the combination of mitomycin plus tegafur in prolonging the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with resected stage III gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resected stage III gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned, using sealed envelopes, to receive either chemotherapy or no further treatment. Chemotherapy was started within 28 days after surgery according to the following schedule: mitomycin 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (bolus) at day 1 of chemotherapy; 30 days later, oral tegafur at 400 mg bid daily for 3 months. Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Between January 1988 and September 1994, 148 patients from 10 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 37 months. The tolerability of the treatment was excellent. The overall survival and disease-free survival were higher in the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (P =.04 for survival and P =.01 for disease-free survival in the log-rank test). The overall 5-year survival rate and the 5-year disease-free survival rate were, respectively, 56% and 51% in the treatment group and 36% and 31% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our positive results are consistent with the results of recent studies; which conclude that there is a potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer.

Effectiveness of immunochemotherapy for gastric cancer: a review of the current status

Currently, the most effective treatment of gastric cancer is surgical resection of the tumor with lymphadenectomy, which is the standard treatment in Japan. It is important to determine whether chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy regimens may prolong the survival of patients with gastric cancer. Although gastric cancer cells, in general, have a low sensitivity to chemotherapy and a low immunogenicity related to stimulation of immune competent cells, a new method including biochemical modulation and nonspecific immunopotentiation with biological response modifiers (BRMs) has permitted us to augment the clinical efficacy of immunochemotherapy for gastric cancer. Further, promising new drugs are being developed and await testing for their possible benefit in an adjuvant setting, and recent advances in molecular biology may open a new avenue for tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy for gastric cancer. We will review the current status of immunochemotherapy for gastric cancer and examine its clinical benefit for survival.

Chemosensitivity of micrometastases and circulating tumor cells to uracil and tegafur as evaluated using LacZ gene-tagged Lewis lung carcinoma cell

The chemosensitivity of the sequence of steps responsible for metastasis formation including circulating tumor cells and micrometastases to a 5-fluorouracil derivative (UFT) was examined with a novel micrometastasis model featuring Lewis lung carcinoma cells tagged with the bacterial LacZ gene and hygromycinR gene (hygR). Metastases in the lung could be specifically detected at the single-cell level by X-Gal staining after inoculation of LacZ-transfected tumor cells. Spontaneous metastasis in mice bearing subcutaneous primary tumors was significantly inhibited by UFT at doses of 15-20 mg/kg when it was orally administered from day 14, during the early stage of micrometastasis formation, but not by late administration from day 22. Experimental pulmonary metastasis was also inhibited without significant toxic side effects by oral administration of UFT at a daily dose of 20 mg/kg from day 4, when the tumor cells start new growth in the lung, but not by daily treatment from 8 days after intravenous injection. Oral administration of UFT had no effect on tumor cell arrest in the lung as detected by X-Gal staining. Furthermore, PCR analysis revealed that circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood of mice bearing primary tumors after subcutaneous injection of hygR-tagged tumor cells were significantly reduced by the oral administration of UFT for 7 days in a dose-dependent manner. These results indicate that circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood and micrometastases in the initial growth phase in the lungs are sensitive to this chemotherapeutic agent, and suggest that micrometastasis formation can be effectively inhibited by long-term oral administration of anticancer agents with minimal toxic side effects.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for gastric cancer in non-Asian patients: revisiting a meta-analysis of randomised trials

The aim of this study was to assess whether adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection of gastric cancer increases survival rates.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1966-1999), CancerLit (1983-1999), bibliographies, personal reprint files, and review articles were searched for relevant articles. Studies had to be randomised controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation following curative resection of stomach cancer that took place in non-Asian countries. Two reviewers independently evaluated the trials for eligibility, quality assessment and data abstraction, 13 trials met the eligibility criteria. The odds ratio for death in the treated group was 0.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.97), corresponding to a relative risk of 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-1.00). Subgroup analyses showed a trend towards a larger magnitude of the effect when analysis was restricted to trials in which at least 2/3 of patients had node-positive disease. Our results suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy may produce a small survival benefit of borderline statistical significance in patients with curatively resected gastric carcinoma. Continued trials to find and confirm an effective adjuvant strategy are warranted.

Histopathological assessment of multidrug resistance in gastric cancer: expression of P-glycoprotein, multidrug resistance-associated protein, and lung-resistance protein

Because local recurrence is common after a curative resection for advanced gastric cancer, there has been significant interest in adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the overall effect of chemotherapy remains debatable regarding patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Multidrug resistance is thought to be a major cause of failure in cancer chemotherapy, and thus the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-Gp), multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), and lung-resistance protein (LRP) in tumor cells was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. In 20 gastric adenocarcinomas, 11 (55%), 2 (10%), and 0 (0%) were positive for MRP, LRP, and P-Gp. In malignant lymphomas, only 3 out of 10 cases were positive for MRP (30%). The positive rate of MRP staining was significantly higher in well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas (80%) than in poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (20%). With regard to the degree of MRP expression and histological cell type, higher grades (grade 2-3) were observed only in well and moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas. In terms of the positive-stained cells and staining intensity, heterogeneity was observed in the staining profile of MRP. The proliferative cell nuclear antigen labeling index (PCNA LI) of MRP-positive and MRP-negative cases was 49.3% +/- 11.6% and 49.4 +/- 6.9%, respectively. No correlation was observed between the MRP expression and PCNA LI. In conclusion, the incidence of MRP expression in gastric cancer was the highest in three different multidrug resistance-related epitopes. An evaluation of the MRP expression thus seemed to be beneficial for determining the optimal strategy of chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors and rational approach in the treatment of submucosal cancer of the stomach

In early gastric cancer, lymph node metastasis is known to be a prognostic factor. A retrospective study of 134 patients with submucosal gastric cancer (SMGC) who had undergone gastrectomy with lymph node dissection was performed to evaluate the prognostic factors and indication of postoperative chemotherapy. Five-year disease-free survival rate for 121 patients without nodal metastasis was 100% with (n = 62) or without postoperative chemotherapy (n = 59). On the other hand, it was 72.9% for 13 patients with nodal metastases, although all patients had undergone D2 or D3 resection and received postoperative chemotherapy. Tumor recurrence occurred only in three patients (n = 3) with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) producing cancer and lymph node metastasis. Multivariate analysis with the Cox's proportional hazard model revealed AFP positivity to be a new independent prognostic factor in addition to lymph node metastasis in the patients with SMGC. Our findings suggest that routine use of postoperative chemotherapy does not appear rational for the patients without nodal metastasis and that new modalities of operation and chemotherapy may be necessary for the patients with AFP producing SMGC with nodal metastasis. The necessity of chemotherapy in conventional-type SMGCs with nodal involvement remains to be studied in future.

Submucosal gastric cancer with lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The intraoperative assessment of lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer remains difficult and the characteristics of recurrence after gastrectomy are not well known regarding submucosal cancer.

METHODS

We examined 452 patients with submucosal gastric cancer and compared the clinicopathologic features as well as recurrence patterns between the 71 cases with lymph node metastasis (group I) and the 381 without it (group II).

RESULTS

The mean tumor sizes were 44.8 and 33.5 mm, respectively (P < 0.01). The incidences of lymphatic invasion and vascular invasion were 91.5% (65/71) and 45.1% (32/71) in group I, which were significantly higher than those in group II (36.7 and 14.2%, 140/381 and 54/381, respectively, P < 0.01). A total of 21 patients (4.6%, 21/452) experienced recurrence after undergoing a gastrectomy and hematogenic recurrence was the most frequent type of recurrence (2.0%, 9/452). However, in group I, lymphatic recurrence was most frequently observed (7.0%, 5/71), and it was more frequent than in group II (0.3%, 1/381, P < 0.01). The median intervals between gastrectomy and recurrence were 34.5 and 64.0 months in groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The submucosal cancer with larger size, lymphatic invasion, and vascular invasion has high risks for lymph node metastasis. Furthermore, a strict follow-up for lymphatic as well as hematogenic recurrence is important for the patients with node positive submucosal cancer, especially within 5 years after operation.