What is the effect of adjusting epirubicin doses for body surface area?

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Determinants of Variability in Epirubicin Exposure and Tissue Distribution

BACKGROUND

Epirubicin is an anthracycline antineoplastic drug that is primarily used in combination therapies for the treatment of breast, gastric, lung and ovarian cancers and lymphomas. Epirubicin is administered intravenously (IV) over 3 to 5 min once every 21 days with dosing based on body surface area (BSA; mg/m²). Despite accounting for BSA, marked inter-subject variability in circulating epirubicin plasma concentration has been reported.

METHODS

In vitro experiments were conducted to determine the kinetics of epirubicin glucuronidation by human liver microsomes in the presence and absence of validated UGT2B7 inhibitors. A full physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was built and validated using Simcyp^® (version 19.1, Certara, Princeton, NJ, USA). The model was used to simulate epirubicin exposure in 2000 Sim-Cancer subjects over 158 h following a single intravenous dose of epirubicin. A multivariable linear regression model was built using simulated demographic and enzyme abundance data to determine the key drivers of variability in systemic epirubicin exposure.

RESULTS

Multivariable linear regression modelling demonstrated that variability in simulated systemic epirubicin exposure following intravenous injection was primarily driven by differences in hepatic and renal UGT2B7 expression, plasma albumin concentration, age, BSA, GFR, haematocrit and sex. By accounting for these factors, it was possible to explain 87% of the variability in epirubicin in a simulated cohort of 2000 oncology patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study describes the development and evaluation of a full-body PBPK model to assess systemic and individual organ exposure to epirubicin. Variability in epirubicin exposure was primarily driven by hepatic and renal UGT2B7 expression, plasma albumin concentration, age, BSA, GFR, haematocrit and sex.

Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology convened a Panel of experts in medical and gynecologic oncology, clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics, and biostatistics and a patient representative. MEDLINE searches identified studies published in English between 1996 and 2010, and a systematic review of the literature was conducted. A majority of studies involved breast, ovarian, colon, and lung cancers. This guideline does not address dosing for novel targeted agents.

RESULTS

Practice pattern studies demonstrate that up to 40% of obese patients receive limited chemotherapy doses that are not based on actual body weight. Concerns about toxicity or overdosing in obese patients with cancer, based on the use of actual body weight, are unfounded.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Panel recommends that full weight-based cytotoxic chemotherapy doses be used to treat obese patients with cancer, particularly when the goal of treatment is cure. There is no evidence that short- or long-term toxicity is increased among obese patients receiving full weight-based doses. Most data indicate that myelosuppression is the same or less pronounced among the obese than the non-obese who are administered full weight-based doses. Clinicians should respond to all treatment-related toxicities in obese patients in the same ways they do for non-obese patients. The use of fixed-dose chemotherapy is rarely justified, but the Panel does recommend fixed dosing for a few select agents. The Panel recommends further research into the role of pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics to guide appropriate dosing of obese patients with cancer.

Technical note: Criterion validity of whole body surface area equations: a comparison using 3D laser scanning

Measurements of whole body surface area (WBSA) have important applications in numerous fields including biological anthropology, clinical medicine, biomechanics, and sports science. Currently, WBSA is most often estimated using predictive equations due to the complex and time consuming methods required for direct measurement. The main aim of this study was to identify whether there were significant and meaningful differences between WBSA measurements taken using a whole body three-dimensional (3D) scanner (criterion measure) and the estimates derived from each WBSA equation identified from a systematic review. The study also aimed to determine whether differences varied according to body mass index (BMI), sex, or athletic status. Fifteen WBSA equations were compared with direct measurements taken on 1,714 young adult subjects, aged 18-30 years, using the Vitus Smart 3D whole body scanner, including 1,452 subjects (753 males, 699 females) from the general Australian population and 262 rowers (148 males, 114 females). Mixed-design analysis of variances determined significant differences and accuracy was quantified using Bland-Altman analysis and effect sizes. Thirteen of the 15 equations overestimated WBSA. With a few exceptions, equations were accurate with a low-systematic error (bias ≤2%) and low-random error (standard deviation of the differences 1.5-3.0%). However, BMI did have a substantial impact with the accuracy of some WBSA equations varying between the four BMI categories. The Shuter and Aslani: Eur J Appl Physiol 82 (2000) 250-254 equation was identified as the most accurate equation and should be used for Western populations 18-30 years of age. Care must be taken when deciding which equation to use when estimating WBSA.

Impact of UGT2B7 His268Tyr polymorphism on the outcome of adjuvant epirubicin treatment in breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Epirubicin is a common adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. It is mainly eliminated after glucuronidation through uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). The present study aimed to describe the impact of the UGT2B7(His268Tyr) polymorphism on invasive disease-free survival in breast cancer patients after epirubicin treatment.

METHODS

This is a pharmacogenetic study based on samples collected from 745 breast cancer patients of the Austrian Tumor of breast tissue: Incidence, Genetics, and Environmental Risk factors (TIGER) cohort who did not present metastases at baseline. This cohort included 205 women with epirubicin-based combination chemotherapy, 113 patients having received chemotherapy without epirubicin and 427 patients having received no chemotherapy at all. Of the epirubicin-treated subgroup, 120 were subsequently treated with tamoxifen. For all women UGT2B7(His268Tyr) was genotyped. Invasive disease-free survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 205 epirubicin-treated patients, carriers of two UGT2B7(268Tyr) alleles had a mean invasive disease-free survival of 8.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.9 to 9.3) years as compared to 7.5 (95% CI 6.9 to 8.0) years in carriers of at least one UGT2B7(268His) allele (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 2.64 (95% CI 1.22 to 5.71); P = 0.014). In addition, the impact of the UGT2B7(His268Tyr) polymorphism became even more pronounced in patients subsequently treated with tamoxifen (adjusted HR = 5.22 (95% CI 1.67 to 26.04); P = 0.015) whereas no such difference in invasive disease-free survival was observed in patients not receiving epirubicin.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer patients carrying the UGT2B7(268Tyr/Tyr) genotype may benefit most from adjuvant epirubicin-based chemotherapy. These results warrant confirmation in further studies.

Fixed dosing versus body size-based dosing of monoclonal antibodies in adult clinical trials

Although without clear scientific rationale, body size-based dosing is often used for administering monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). This simulation study compared the performance of body size-based and fixed dosing in reducing pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) variability in adults for 12 mAbs with published population PK and/or PD models. At the population level, 95th percentile intervals of concentration-time profiles, distribution, and variability of exposure for 1000 subjects after both dosing approaches were examined. At the individual level, the difference between the exposures of patients with extreme body sizes from the typical exposure following both approaches was compared. The results show that the 2 dosing approaches perform similarly across the mAbs investigated with fixed dosing being better for some mAbs and body size-based dosing being better for the others. Based on this finding, we recommend using fixed dosing in first-in-human (FIH) adult studies because it offers other advantages. When sufficient data become available, a full assessment of body size effect on PK/PD should be conducted to determine the optimal dosing approach for phase 3 trials. Other factors that may affect the selection of dosing approach were also discussed. Dosing approach for mAbs in the pediatric population is out of the scope of this study.

Flat-fixed dosing versus body surface area based dosing of anticancer drugs in adults: does it make a difference?

The current practice of using body-surface area (BSA) in dosing anticancer agents was implemented in clinical oncology half a century ago. By correcting for BSA, it was generally assumed that cancer patients would receive a dose of a particular cytotoxic drug associated with an acceptable degree of toxicities without reducing the agent's therapeutic effect. More recently, doubt has arisen to this hypothesis, and for many drugs, the effects of BSA on the pharmacokinetics of these agents have therefore been studied retrospectively. In (by far) most cases, use of BSA does not reduce the interindividual variation in the pharmacokinetics of adults, and thus, a logical rationale for further use of this tool in dosing adults is lacking. As a result, alternative dosing strategies have been proposed in order to replace BSA-based dosing. Flat-fixed dosing regimens have been suggested, thereby avoiding potential dose calculation mistakes. As flat-fixed dosing does not typically lead to greater pharmacokinetic variability, it does not seem worse than using BSA-based dosing. While it provides a simplification, it can, however, be questioned whether to call this an improvement or not. The implementation of so-called genotyping and phenotyping strategies, and therapeutic drug monitoring, may probably be of more clinical value. In the end, the nonscientifically based BSA-based dosing strategy should be replaced by alternative strategies. Despite the lack of basic fundamentals, BSA-based dosing still seems "untouchable" in clinical oncology. Even when alternatives will be shown to be indisputably better, many hurdles will probably have to be overcome before physicians will be willing to ban BSA-based dosing. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.

Chemotherapy Dosing Part I: Scientific Basis for Current Practice and Use of Body Surface Area

Cytotoxic chemotherapy is characterised by a low therapeutic index and significant variability in therapeutic and toxic effects. In an attempt to reduce this variability, most chemotherapy doses are individualised according to patient body surface area (BSA). This practice, which was introduced almost 50 years ago, clearly has practical and economic implications for the healthcare system. Furthermore, the clinical value of this approach has, in recent years, been questioned. Despite established practice, chemotherapy dose selection remains complicated, partly because treatment effects are difficult to measure, partly because drugs are used in combination with other treatment modalities, and also because the patient's condition may change with disease progression. Various patient-related factors can affect drug pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), for example organ function, expression and activity of metabolising enzymes, drug resistance, body size, gender, age, concomitant disease and co-administration of other drugs. These factors may be of clinical significance in chemotherapy dose determination and measures of PK, PD or both feature in attempts to devise more rigorous methods for chemotherapy dosing. Part I of this series of two reviews describes the history and clinical impact of BSA-based chemotherapy, and examines the scientific evidence to support BSA dosing. It evaluates the factors affecting PK and PD for specific drugs that could inform and refine dose determination.

Factors affecting the pharmacokinetic profile of MS-275, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with cancer

AIMS

To evaluate elimination pathways of the histone deacetylase inhibitor MS-275 in vitro and screen for relationships between demographic factors that may affect its pharmacokinetics in vivo.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Substrate specificity of MS-275 for the liver-specific organic anion transporting polypeptides (OATPs) was assessed using Xenopus laevis oocytes, and in vitro metabolism was evaluated using human liver microsomes. In vivo pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 64 adult patients (36 male/28 female; median age, 57 years) receiving MS-275 orally (dose range, 2 to 12 mg/m2).

RESULTS

Accumulation of [G-3H]MS-275 by oocytes expressing OATP1B1 or OATP1B3 was not significantly different from water-injected controls (p = 0.82). Furthermore, no metabolites could be detected after incubation of MS-275 in human liver microsomes, suggesting that hepatic metabolism is a minor pathway of elimination. The mean (+/- SD) apparent oral clearance of MS-275 was 38.5 +/- 18.7 L/h, with a coefficient of variation (%CV) of 48.7%. When clearance was adjusted for body-surface area (BSA), the inter-individual variability was similar (%CV = 50.1%). In addition, in a linear-regression analysis, except for adjusted ideal body weight (p = 0.02, |r| = 0.29), none of the studied measures (BSA, lean-body mass, ideal body weight, body-mass index, height, weight, age, and sex) was a significant covariate (p > 0.13; |r| < 0.11) for oral clearance.

CONCLUSIONS

The current analysis has eliminated a number of candidate covariates from further consideration as important determinants of MS-275 absorption and disposition. Furthermore, MS-275 can be added to the list of cancer drugs where BSA-based dosing is not more accurate than fixed dosing.

Pharmacokinetics of Amrubicin and Its Active Metabolite Amrubicinol in Lung Cancer Patients

Amrubicin, a synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline agent, was recently approved in Japan for treatment of small-cell lung cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. Amrubicin is converted enzymatically to the C-13 hydroxy metabolite amrubicinol, which is active and possesses a cytotoxicity 10 to 100 times that of the parent drug. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of amrubicin and its active metabolite amrubicinol. Amrubicin was administered on days 1-3 in 16 patients with advanced lung cancer. The pharmacokinetics analysis of amrubicin and amrubicinol was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography. When 45 mg/m amrubicin was administered in a bolus injection once every 24 hours for 3 consecutive days, the areas under the curves (0 to 72 hours) for amrubicin and amrubicinol were 13,490 and 2585 ng . h/mL, respectively. The apparent total clearance (CLapp) of amrubicin was 15.4 L/h. The area-under-the-curve ratio of amrubicinol to amrubicin was 15.1 +/- 4.6% (mean +/- SD) at doses ranging from 30 to 45 mg/m. Interindividual variability in the enzymatic conversion of amrubicin to amrubicinol was small. In contrast, a large interindividual variability in the CLapp of amrubicin was observed (CV = 49.8%). The areas under the curves of amrubicin and amrubicinol seemed to be associated with the severity of hematologic toxicities. There is a possibility that monitoring of the plasma concentrations of amrubicin and amrubicinol may provide an efficient tool for establishing the optimal dosage of amrubicin in each patient.

Clinical application of a semimechanistic-physiologic population PK/PD model for neutropenia following pemetrexed therapy

PURPOSE

The objective of these analyses was to examine the effect of variations in the explanatory factors of neutropenic response, identified by semimechanistic-physiologic population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling, on clinically important features of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC)-time profile (e.g, the nadir of the ANC [NANC], its timing [T (Nadir)], and the timecourse of recovery [T (Rec)]).

METHODS

Correlation analyses were used to evaluate the relationship of NANC, T (Nadir), and T (Rec) as a function of overall systemic exposure (AUC) and each of the covariates contained in the population PK/PD model. Simulations using the final PK/PD model were used to generate complete ANC-time profiles. Frequency counts of NANCs from the simulated profiles were used to quantitatively explore differences in the incidence and severity of neutropenia associated with a variety of scenarios (500 mg/m2 versus 600 mg/m2, normal vitamin deficiency markers versus elevated vitamin deficiency markers, and body surface area-based versus renal function-based dosing) and to evaluate the effect of individual explanatory factors with respect to neutropenic response.

RESULTS

Information obtained from correlation analysis and simulations was helpful in quantitatively exploring the impact of dose, exposure, and/or patient characteristics on neutropenic response. The information gained from these simulations provided supportive evidence for the decision to routinely include vitamin supplementation during pemetrexed treatment as a means of managing the risk of severe neutropenia secondary to pemetrexed administration. These techniques also provided information regarding the specific T (Nadir) and T( Rec) for inclusion in product labeling and suggested that a 14-day treatment cycle might be feasible for pemetrexed.

CONCLUSION

For population PK/PD models, to provide useful information for the practicing clinician or the clinical development team, it is not sufficient to look only at influences of covariates on model parameters. Rather, the modeling results need to be carefully investigated in terms of clinically relevant measures.

Dose-escalating and pharmacological study of oxaliplatin in adult cancer patients with impaired renal function: a National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group Study

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and maximum tolerated doses of oxaliplatin in patients with renal impairment and to develop formal guidelines for oxaliplatin dosing in this patient population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-seven adult cancer patients with variable renal function received intravenous oxaliplatin at 60 to 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified by 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCL) into four cohorts: group A (controls, CrCL > or =60 mL/min), group B (mild dysfunction, CrCL 40 to 59 mL/min), group C (moderate dysfunction, CrCL 20 to 39 mL/min), and group D (severe dysfunction, CrCL <20 mL/min). Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients, and urine and plasma ultrafiltrates were assayed for platinum concentrations.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in any patient group during the first cycle of therapy. Escalation of oxaliplatin to the maximum dose of 130 mg/m2 was well tolerated in all patient groups with a CrCL > or =20 mL/min (groups A, B, and C). Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that patients with decreased CrCL had a corresponding decrease in the clearance of plasma ultrafiltrable platinum (r2 = 0.765). However, oxaliplatin-induced side effects were not more common or severe in patients with mild to moderate renal dysfunction, despite the decrease in ultrafiltrable platinum clearance.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks is well tolerated by patients with mild to moderate degrees of renal dysfunction. These data strongly support the recommendation that dose reductions of single-agent oxaliplatin are not necessary in patients with a CrCL greater than 20 mL/min.

A population model of epirubicin pharmacokinetics and application to dosage guidelines

PURPOSE

To use a population approach to identify readily available clinical or biochemical characteristics that influence the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin and to develop new dosage guidelines based on these results.

METHODS

Data were available from 109 patients with advanced breast cancer, 72 of whom were known to have liver metastases. They were treated with single-agent epirubicin 12.5 to 120 mg/m(2). Analysis was performed using the software package NONMEM and a three-compartment model was fitted to the data.

RESULTS

Individual clearance (CL) estimates ranged from 4 to 86 l/h and the final model included CL as a function of aspartate aminotransferase (AST): CL (l/h)=72.9-(72.9x0.135xlnAST). Inclusion of this factor reduced the interindividual variability in CL from 49% to 39%. Using a target AUC of 4000 ng.h/ml, the following doses were predicted to achieve this exposure with the greatest precision: AST <150 IU/l 125 mg; AST 150-250 IU/l 90 mg; AST 250-500 IU/l 60 mg; AST >500 IU/l 30 mg. These new guidelines were compared with three other guidelines based on serum bilirubin or AST concentrations and body surface area (BSA). The new guidelines achieved the target with greater precision (root mean squared error, rmse, 39.0%) than the current UK guidelines, current USA guidelines or an earlier equation based on AST (rmse 63%, 62% and 59%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed dosing guidelines should reduce variability in systemic exposure to epirubicin more effectively than traditional approaches. In addition, as they do not require adjustment according to BSA, they could reduce dosage preparation time and the potential for prescribing and dispensing errors.

Epirubicin in patients with liver dysfunction: development and evaluation of a novel dose modification scheme

This study aimed to develop an epirubicin dose modification scheme in women with breast cancer and liver dysfunction. We first identified target areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) of 2400 and 1600 ng/ml.h from pharmacokinetic studies in 15 women with normal liver tests. In a second group of 16 women with abnormal liver biochemistry, the relationship between raised asparate aminotransferase (AST) and epirubicin clearance was: dose=AUC (97.5-34.2xlog AST). Adaptive dosing was evaluated prospectively in a third group of 41 women with serum AST > or =2xnormal+/-raised bilirubin. The median AUCs were 2444 and 1608 ng/ml.h, close to the high and low target AUCs, respectively. Variability in AUC was lower with adaptive dosing than in a fourth group given an unadjusted dose of epirubicin (coefficient of variation=25.8, 30.0 and 46.5%, respectively; P=0.06). Epirubicin dosing based on AST is safe and may reduce pharmacokinetic variability.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the anthracycline anticancer drugs

The anthracycline glycoside antibiotics represent a group of potent anticancer agents with a wide spectrum of activity against solid tumours and haematological malignancies, and are the mainstay of a large number of clinical protocols for the treatment of adult and childhood neoplastic diseases. Their clinical activity is limited, however, by acute and chronic adverse effects. Myelosuppression, predominantly neutropenia and leucopenia, is the dose-limiting toxicity; in addition to this, mucositis, nausea, vomiting and alopecia are frequent, whereas hepatopathy, characterised by elevated bilirubin concentrations, occurs less frequently. Cardiotoxicity is a major adverse effect of the anthracycline antibiotics and can be acute or chronic; in the acute setting, electrocardiographic abnormalities may be seen, including ST-T elevations and arrhythmias, but chronic cardiotoxicity represents a serious adverse effect that may be lethal due to the development of irreversible, cumulative dose-dependent, congestive cardiomyopathy. The occurrence of toxicity displays a marked interindividual variation, and for this reason the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anthracyclines have been extensively investigated in order to identify integrated models that can be used in the clinical setting to prevent the development of serious toxicity, mainly leucopenia, and maximise tumour exposure. Pharmacokinetics has been recognised to influence both the toxicity and the activity of anthracyclines; in particular, there is increasing evidence that the mode of administration plays an important role for cumulative cardiotoxicity and data indicate that bolus administration, rather than continuous infusion, appears to be an important risk factor for anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy, thus implying that this type of toxicity is maximum concentration-dependent. On the contrary, exposure to the drug, as measured by area under the curve, seems best related to the occurrence of leucopenia. Finally, the development of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models allows the simulation of drug effects and ultimately dose optimisation in order to anticipate important toxicities and prevent their occurrence by the administration of prophylactic treatments.

Dosing strategies for anticancer drugs: the good, the bad and body-surface area

Most anticancer drugs are characterised by a narrow therapeutic window; hence, a small change in dose can lead to poor antitumour effects or an unacceptable degree of toxicity. The rationale for using body surface area (BSA) to dose antineoplastic agents is to normalise the effects of drugs, and accordingly, it has been routinely employed as the only independent variable. In the last 10 years, however, several studies have shown a poor relationship of BSA for predicting drug exposure, and an irrelevant correlation between this variable and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. In this paper, the results of this relationship for various commonly used antineoplastic agents are reviewed, and the influence of BSA to decrease the total variability in clearance among patients is underlined. As reported, BSA failed to individualise the effects of the majority of the agents explored. The criteria that can predict a clinically meaningful relationship between BSA and drug clearance are discussed, and some alternative strategies to dose agents when BSA has proven to be useless are proposed.

Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations

PURPOSE

To evaluate relationships between various body-size measures and irinotecan (CPT-11) clearance and metabolism in cancer patients, and to provide future dosing recommendations for this agent.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Pharmacokinetic data were obtained from 82 adult patients (50 men, 32 women; median age, 54 years) receiving CPT-11 as a 90-minute intravenous infusion (dose range, 175 to 350 mg/m(2)). In each patient, plasma samples were collected at timed intervals in the first administration of a 3-week schedule, and CPT-11 and its metabolite, SN-38, were measured by a liquid chromatographic assay.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) CPT-11 clearance was 33.6 +/- 10.8 L/h, with an interindividual variability (IIV) of 32.1%. When clearance was adjusted for body-surface area (BSA), the IIV was similar (34.0%). In addition, in a multiple linear regression analysis, none of the studied measures (BSA, lean body mass, [adjusted] ideal body weight, and body mass index) was a significant covariate (P >.13; r(2) <.014) in our population. Similarly, BSA did not significantly contribute to variability in the relative extent of conversion to SN-38 (P =.26).

CONCLUSION

BSA is not a predictor of CPT-11 clearance or SN-38 pharmacokinetics and does not contribute to reducing kinetic variability. These findings provide a rationale for the conduct of a comparative phase III study between BSA-based dosing and flat or fixed dosing of CPT-11.

Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing

Body surface area (BSA) was introduced into medical oncology in order to derive a safe starting dose for phase I studies of anticancer drugs from preclinical animal toxicology data. It is not clear however, as to why dosing by BSA was extended to the routine dosing of antineoplastic agents. Several formulas exist to estimate BSA, but the formula derived by DuBois and DuBois is the one used in adult medical oncology. This formula was derived based on data from only nine patients; subsequent attempts to validate the formula have found the DuBois formula to either over or underestimate the actual determined BSA. While cardiac output does correlate with BSA, the relationship between BSA and other physiologic measures relevant for drug metabolism and disposition, such as, renal and hepatic function, is weak or nonexistent. Further only epirubicin, etoposide, and carboplatin have been studied to determine if dosing by BSA would reduce interpatient variability, and none of these drugs were found to have significant relationships between their pharmacokinetics and BSA. Future clinical trials of new agents should not presume that dosing based on BSA reduces interpatient variability. Studies should examine the role, if any, BSA has in dosing new chemotherapeutic agents in initial phase I studies.

A clinical phase I and pharmacokinetic study of BBR 2778, a novel anthracenedione analogue, administered intravenously, 3 weekly

The anthracenedione analogue, BBR 2778 is an active antitumour agent preclinically and has reduced potential for cardiotoxicity compared with other similar drugs in preclinical models. BBR 2778 was administered 3 weekly by a 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion to 24 patients and the dose escalated rapidly from 20 to 240 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade 4 in 3/5 patients at 240 mg/m2. Other toxicities > or = CTC grade 3 were: vomiting, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia and lethargy. Blue discoloration of veins and urine was also noted. In 1 patient (120 mg/m2, four cycles) left ventricular ejection reaction (LVEF) fell (CTC grade 2) but with no clinical sequelae. BBR 2778 plasma pharmacokinetics were biphasic (mean t(1/2) at 180 mg/m2 = 14.1 h) and the urinary elimination of the unchanged drug was < 10%. In a patient with previously treated small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC), a 49% reduction in measurable disease was noted with resolution of pericardial and pleural effusions (120 mg/m2 x eight cycles). From the results of this phase I study a dose of 180 mg/m2 as a 1 h infusion every 3 weeks would be recommended for phase II trials.

Does immunointensity account for the differences in prognostic significance of Bcl-2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer?

Bcl-2 is an oncogenic protein that plays a central role in apoptosis. The association of Bcl-2 expression and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unclear, with some studies showing improved outcome whilst others show no survival advantage. We evaluated 178 surgically resected NSCLC specimens for Bcl-2 and p53 immunoexpression. Bcl-2 staining was present in 34.9% of cases (weakly staining 24.2%, strongly staining 10.7%), nuclear p53 in 43. 3% and cytoplasmic p53 in 10.7%. There was no association between p53 and survival. Bcl-2 immunoexpression correlated with improved outcome (p=0.04). A sub-group of strongly Bcl-2 staining cases had a poor survival compared to those that stained weakly (p=0.01). The strongly staining cases had a similar survival to negative cases. Immunointensity may therefore account for the disparity in results regarding the prognostic significance of Bcl-2 demonstrated in previous studies.

Achievements and future of chemotherapy

Although surgery and radiotherapy result in a cure in 40% of all cancer patients, the remaining 60% of the patients die as a result of metastatic disease. For those patients cancer has to be considered as a systemic disease and cure from cancer will likely come from some type of systemic treatment. This article gives a brief overview of the achievements in the development of chemotherapy over the last 50 years and the new potential targets for further drug development.

Is òne cycle every three or four weeks' obsolete? A critical review of dose-dense chemotherapy in solid neoplasms

BACKGROUND

Shortening the interval between cycles is one means of increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy, and can be supported by biological and mathematical rationales. Our objective was to assess the clinical relevance of the rapid repetition of regimens (so-called 'dose-dense chemotherapy') in various solid neoplasms.

DESIGN

The medical literature was reviewed in accord with Mulrow's recommendations. Randomised studies comparing frequently-repeated chemotherapy to standard regimens as well as open studies are described and critically examined.

RESULTS

Dose-dense regimens were widely found to be feasible. In small-cell lung cancer, survival of patients receiving dose-dense regimens was better than that of patients treated by standard chemotherapy in three trials, two of which reached significance, when these intensive regimens allowed better dose intensity. In poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors, a dose-dense regimen was not better than standard therapy, perhaps because of an excessively high toxicity-related death rate. However, recent phase II studies have provided encouraging results. In early breast cancer, the one published randomized study in the adjuvant setting showed only a trend towards better disease-free survival in node-positive women receiving a weekly-repeated regimen. Two randomized trials failed to show any benefit in the neoadjuvant setting with a dose-dense regimen. No evidence of a benefit was provided in metastatic breast cancer. In advanced colorectal cancer, evidence of an improvement in survival with weekly or bi-weekly 5-FU-leucovorin compared to a classic monthly schedule has recently been shown in two randomized trials, and dose-dense regimens are recognized as standard therapy in many countries. Phase II studies of dose-dense regimens have also shown high response rates and long survival in many neoplasms, including Ewing's sarcoma, gestational trophoblastic disease, ovarian carcinoma and gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable amount of experience has been gained with frequently-repeated regimens. A few randomized trials have demonstrated a benefit for survival on standard chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer and advanced colorectal cancer. However, this benefit appears to be weak. The combination of dose-dense chemotherapy regimens with new anti-cancer strategies based on our insights into the mechanisms of oncogenesis is a challenge on the eve of the millennium.

Epirubicin: a review of its efficacy as adjuvant therapy and in the treatment of metastatic disease in breast cancer

Epirubicin is a semisynthetic derivative of doxorubicin which has been extensively evaluated in patients with breast cancer. It is effective in the management of metastatic disease and as adjuvant therapy in patients with early breast cancer. In the adjuvant setting, epirubicin-based therapy appears to have efficacy at least equivalent to that of the standard therapy cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), with the most recent trials, predominantly in premenopausal patients, reporting significant gains in relapse-free survival and overall survival for epirubicin-based vs CMF therapy. In a single trial, the 5-year relapse-free survival of postmenopausal patients receiving long term hormonal therapy (tamoxifen) was significantly increased when epirubicin was added as single-agent chemotherapy and compared with tamoxifen alone. In patients with metastatic disease, epirubicin- and doxorubicin-containing regimens (with cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil; FEC and FAC) are therapeutically equivalent. Increasing the dose of epirubicin appears to improve response rates in patients with either metastatic or early disease but, with the exception of 1 adjuvant study, improved overall survival has not been demonstrated. Quality of life (QOL) has yet to be adequately evaluated with epirubicin. The major adverse effects of epirubicin are acute dose-limiting haematotoxicity and cumulative dose-related cardiotoxicity. Other important adverse effects include mucositis, nausea and vomiting, reversible alopecia and local cutaneous reactions. However, the tolerability of epirubicin is better than that of doxorubicin at equimolar doses.

CONCLUSION

Epirubicin has been extensively investigated in patients with breast cancer and has been found to be a highly effective agent, both for the treatment of patients with metastatic disease and as an adjuvant therapy. Recent trials have confirmed that, in selected patients requiring adjuvant therapy, FEC therapy is at least as effective as CMF, a standard treatment. FEC is also therapeutically equivalent to FAC in patients with metastatic breast cancer, and because the therapeutic index appears to be better the opportunity exists to increase dose intensity in an effort to improve efficacy. Such trials, and those of combinations of epirubicin with newer or alternative agents, should result in the introduction of more effective and better tolerated epirubicin-based protocols for adjuvant therapy and the management of patients with advanced breast cancer. In the meantime there is sufficient evidence to justify consideration of epirubicin for inclusion in first-line therapies for patients with early or metastatic breast cancer.

Practical treatment guide for dose individualisation in cancer chemotherapy

Dosages of anticancer drugs are usually calculated on the basis of a uniform standard, the body surface area (BSA). Although many physiological functions are proportionate to BSA, overall drug clearance is only partially related to this parameter. Consequently, following administration of equivalent drug dosages based on BSA, a wide variability in plasma drug concentrations can be found between patients, as a result of which some patients experience little toxicity while others may show severe toxic symptoms. A clear pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic correlation has been demonstrated for some anticancer drugs, and this relationship provides a background against which rational dose optimisation can be implemented for individual patients. The 3 strategies that can be employed for optimising dosage regimens, none based on BSA, are described and criticised. A priori adaptive dosage determination is based on the relative contribution of identifiable characteristics of patient, drug therapy and disease state that influence plasma drug concentrations; the dosage regimen is based on each patient's profile with regard to these characteristics. Although this approach is most successful with drugs whose clearance is closely tied to renal function, patient characteristics such age, obesity, serum albumin or hepatic function may be useful. The anticancer drug most closely identified with this approach is carboplatin, although dosage reduction strategies for etoposide, taxanes, anthracyclines, topotecan, oxazaphosphorines, vinca alkaloids or melphalan are advocated for patients with renal or hepatic dysfunction. The importance of pharmacogenetics for fluorouracil and mercaptopurine is also briefly discussed. The second approach consists of adaptive dosage adjustments during repetitive or continuous administration of a drug. It has been used for several years to administer methotrexate therapy and, more recently, it has been developed more fully and applied to continuous infusion of fluorouracil or etoposide. It was based, after determination of a target plasma concentration or area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC), on modification of the drug dosage during the cycle of chemotherapy or for the next cycle. Finally, the third approach of adaptive dosage adjustment with feedback control, based on population pharmacokinetics, with limited sampling strategy, may allow a feedback revision of the dosage following measurement of plasma drug concentration and comparison with the population previously studied. This approach is a theoretical strategy which has not, until now, been used prospectively in clinical oncology. For drugs such as anticancer agents with a very narrow therapeutic index, every effort should be made to minimise interpatient variability in drug exposure in order to maximise the benefit while keeping the risk of serious adverse effects at an acceptable level. This is particularly important when treatment is being given with curative intent.