The role of allogeneic SCT in primary myelofibrosis: a British Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study

Standardizing Definitions of Hematopoietic Recovery, Graft Rejection, Graft Failure, Poor Graft Function, and Donor Chimerism in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Report on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is potentially curative for certain hematologic malignancies and nonmalignant diseases. The field of allo-HCT has witnessed significant advances, including broadening indications for transplantation, availability of alternative donor sources, less toxic preparative regimens, new cell manipulation techniques, and novel GVHD prevention methods, all of which have expanded the applicability of the procedure. These advances have led to clinical practice conundrums when applying traditional definitions of hematopoietic recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, because these may vary based on donor type, cell source, cell dose, primary disease, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and conditioning intensity, among other variables. To address these contemporary challenges, we surveyed a panel of allo-HCT experts in an attempt to standardize these definitions. We analyzed survey responses from adult and pediatric transplantation physicians separately. Consensus was achieved for definitions of neutrophil and platelet recovery, graft rejection, graft failure, poor graft function, and donor chimerism, but not for delayed engraftment. Here we highlight the complexities associated with the management of mixed donor chimerism in malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases, which remains an area for future research. We recognize that there are multiple other specific, and at times complex, clinical scenarios for which clinical management must be individualized.

Splenectomy before allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: A French nationwide study

The value of pretransplant splenectomy in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is subject to debate, since the procedure may preclude subsequent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). To determine the impact of pretransplant splenectomy on the incidence of allo-HCT, we conducted a comprehensive retrospective study of all patients with MF for whom an unrelated donor search had been initiated via the French bone marrow transplantation registry (RFGM) between 1 January 2008 and 1 January 2017. Additional data were collected from the patients' medical files and a database held by the French-Language Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy (SFGM-TC). We used a multistate model with four states ("RFGM registration"; "splenectomy"; "death before allo-HCT", and "allo-HCT") to evaluate the association between splenectomy and the incidence of allo-HCT. The study included 530 patients from 57 centers. With a median follow-up time of 6 years, we observed 81 splenectomies, 99 deaths before allo-HCT (90 without splenectomy and nine after), and 333 allo-HCTs (268 without splenectomy and 65 after). In a bivariable analysis, the hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] for the association of splenectomy with allo-HCT was 7.2 [5.1-10.3] in the first 4 months and 1.18 [0.69-2.03] thereafter. The hazard ratio [95% CI] for death associated with splenectomy was 1.58 [0.79-3.14]. These reassuring results suggest that splenectomy does not preclude allo-HCT in patients with MF.

Incidence and Outcome of Late Relapse after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis

In this cross-sectional study, we retrospectively evaluated the files of 227 patients with myelofibrosis who underwent transplantation between 1994 and 2015 for relapse later than 5 years after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). A total of 94 patients who were alive and in remission at 5 years were identified with follow-up of at least 5 years (median, 9.15 years) after SCT. Thirteen patients (14%) experienced late molecular (n = 6) or hematologic (n = 7) relapse at a median of 7.1 years while 81 patients did not experience relapse. Relapse patients received either donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) (n = 7) and/or second transplantation (n = 4). Of those, 72.7% achieved again full donor cell chimerism and molecular remission, and after a median follow-up of 45 months, the 3-year overall survival rates for patients with or without relapse were 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 100%) and 98.8% (95% CI, 96% to 100%), respectively (P = .13). We conclude that late relapse occurs in about 14% of the patients and the majority can be successfully salvaged with DLI and/or second allograft. All patients with molecular relapse are alive and support the long-time molecular monitoring in myelofibrosis patients after allogeneic SCT.

Splenectomy in Myelofibrosis: Indications, Efficacy, and Complications

Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with advanced myelofibrosis (MF). Splenectomy may offer an effective therapeutic option for treating massive splenomegaly in patients with MF, and especially in cases of disease refractory to conventional drugs, but it is associated with a number of complications as well as substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether splenectomy should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is also controversial, and there is a lack of prospective randomized clinical trials that assess the role of splenectomy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with MF. Although splenectomy is not routinely performed before transplantation, it may be appropriate in patients with massive splenomegaly and related symptoms, so long as the higher risk of graft failure in such cases is taken into account. This review aims to describe the efficacy, indications, and complications of splenectomy in patients with MF; and to evaluate the long-term impact of splenectomy on patient survival and risk of disease transformation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis is one of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms with heterogeneous clinical course. Though many treatment options, including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, have provided clinical benefits and improved survival, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (AHSCT) remains the only potentially curative therapy. Considering the significant transplant-related morbidity and mortality, it is crucial to decide who to proceed to AHSCT, and when. In this review, we discuss recent updates in patient selection, prior splenectomy, conditioning regimen, donor type, molecular mutation, and other factors affecting AHSCT outcomes. Relapse is a major cause of treatment failure; we also describe recent data on minimal residual disease monitoring and management of relapse. In addition, emerging studies have reported pretransplant therapy with ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis showing favorable results, and further research is needed to explore its use in the post-transplant setting.

Fludarabine/Busulfan Conditioning-Based Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: Role of Ruxolitinib in Improving Survival Outcomes

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment modality for primary myelofibrosis (MF) and related myeloproliferative neoplasms. Older age at diagnosis and age-related comorbidities make most patients ineligible for allo-HCT, given concerns for nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Here we report the outcomes of 37 consecutive recipients of allo-HCT for MF performed at a single center between 2009 and 2018 with a standardized institutional protocol. Most patients received ruxolitinib before HCT (n = 32), and those with splenomegaly >22 cm received pretransplantation splenic irradiation. The median age at HCT was 60 years (range, 40 to 74 years), and 68% of the cohort carried a JAK2 driver mutation. All patients received fludarabine/busulfan-based conditioning; 22 patients (59%) received a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. All patients received peripheral blood grafts, from a matched sibling donor in 16 patients (43%), an unrelated donor in 20 patients, and a haploidentical-related donor in 1 patient. Sixty-one percent had a Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index ≥3, 40% had a Karnofsky Performance Status score <90, and 24% had a high-risk DIPSS Plus score. With a median follow-up of 40.2 months (range, 16.9 to 115 months), the 3-year overall survival and relapse-free survival were 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.4% to 90.5%) and 78.4% (95% CI, 61.4% to 88.5%), respectively. Only 2 patients relapsed/progressed after transplant. NRM at 2 years was 16.2% (95% CI, 6.5% to 29.9%). All patients engrafted. Sixteen patients were treated with ruxolitinib post-transplantation for graft-versus-host disease, graft rejection/relapse, or persistent MF. These results suggest that pretransplantation ruxolitinib, fludarabine/busulfan-based conditioning, and splenic management are keys to improved transplantation outcomes in patients undergoing allo-HCT for MF.

The role of allogeneic stem-cell transplant in myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors: a case-based review

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is, at present, the only potentially curative therapy for myelofibrosis (MF). Despite many improvements, outcomes of HSCT are still burdened by substantial morbidity and high transplant-related mortality. Allogeneic transplant is generally considered in intermediate-2 and high-risk patients aged <70 years, but the optimal selection of patients and timing of the procedure remains under debate, as does as the role of JAK inhibitors in candidates for HSCT. Starting from a real-life clinical case scenario, herein we examine some of the crucial issues of HSCT for MF in light of recent refinements on MF risk stratification, data on the use of ruxolitinib before and after transplant and findings on the impact of different conditioning regimens and donor selection.

Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group

We report a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n = 25), matched unrelated (n = 25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n = 10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range, 1 to 68 months), outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB arm versus the FT arm were as follows: PFS, 43% versus 55% (P = .28); overall survival (OS), 54% versus 70% (P = .17); relapse/progression, 36% versus 24% (P = .24); nonrelapse mortality (NRM), 21% in both arms (P = .99); and graft failure, 14% versus 10% (P = .96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P = .03). Both neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment were significantly influenced by previous splenectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16 to 4.51; P = .02) and splenomegaly at transplantation (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.94; P = .03). In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Myelofibrosis

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is a category in the World Health Organization classification of myeloid tumors. BCR-ABL1-negative MPN is a subcategory that includes primary myelofibrosis (MF), post-essential thrombocythemia MF, and post-polycythemia vera MF. These disorders are characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation. Clinically, these diseases present with anemia and splenomegaly and significant constitutional symptoms such as severe fatigue, symptoms associated with an enlarged spleen and liver, pruritus, fevers, night sweats, and bone pain. Multiple treatment options may provide symptom relief and improved survival; however, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only potentially curative option. The decision for a transplant is based on patient prognosis, age, comorbidities, and functional status. This review describes the recent data on various peritransplantation factors and their effect on outcomes of patients with MF and new therapeutic areas, such as the use and timing of Janus kinase inhibitors with HCT and gives overall conclusions from the available data in the published literature.

A Review of Myeloablative vs Reduced Intensity/Non-Myeloablative Regimens in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantations

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment option for both malignant and some benign hematological diseases. During the last decade, many of the newer high-dose regimens in different intensity have been developed specifically for patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Today there are three main approaches used prior to allogeneic transplantation: Myeloablative (MA), Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) and Non-MA (NMA) regimens. MA regimens cause irreversible cytopenia and there is a requirement for stem cell support. Patients who receive NMA regimen have minimal cytopenia and this type of regimen can be given without stem cell support. RIC regimens do not fit the criteria of MA and NMA: the cytopenia is reversible and the stem cell support is necessary. NMA/RIC for Allo-HSCT has opened a new era for treating elderly patients and those with comorbidities. The RIC conditioning was used for 40% of all Allo-HSCT and this trend continue to increase. In this paper, we will review these regimens in the setting of especially allogeneic HSCT and our aim is to describe the history, features and impact of these conditioning regimens on specific diseases.

Usefulness of Low-Dose Splenic Irradiation prior to Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Elderly Patients with Myelofibrosis

The Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, was recently approved in Japan and has been effective in many patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Although the inhibitor decreases splenomegaly and relieves MF-related symptoms, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains as the only curative therapy for MF. The presence of splenomegaly has been reported as a risk factor for graft failure, delayed engraftment, and poor survival. Here, we report two elderly MF patients with massive splenomegaly and a JAK2 V617F mutation. These patients underwent splenic irradiation to decrease splenomegaly prior to HCT with a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. Massive splenomegaly gradually decreased by 4 Gy splenic irradiation. The subsequent RIC regimen involved 4 Gy total body irradiation and fludarabine and intravenous busulfan. In both patients, engraftment failure did not occur, and complete remission was achieved. The splenomegaly decreased, and MF-related symptoms were resolved. Furthermore, the JAK2 V617F mutation disappeared, and fibrosis in the bone marrow regressed. We suggest that splenic irradiation prior to the RIC regimen for HCT in elderly MF patients with massive splenomegaly is safe. Furthermore, the HCT protocols with splenic irradiation should be considered for patients who have not shown clinical benefits to optimal medical management such as treatment with ruxolitinib.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: A Practical Review

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative neoplasm with cardinal features of extramedullary hematopoiesis, hepatosplenomegaly, cytopenias, and constitutional symptoms that result in shortened survival and leukemic transformation. It is a disease predominantly of the elderly, and currently available therapies only offer symptom control without curative benefit or ability to alter disease progression. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) is the only potentially curative intervention; however, this is only feasible in younger and medically fit patients and selectively offered to those with high-risk disease. Despite ongoing advancements, HSCT is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, and the determination of which patients with myelofibrosis are ideal candidates and the selection of the opportune moment to proceed with transplantation remains challenging. This review summarizes our current recommendations for the role of and indications for HSCT in myelofibrosis.

Indication and management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in primary myelofibrosis: a consensus process by an EBMT/ELN international working group

The aim of this work is to produce recommendations on the management of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in primary myelofibrosis (PMF). A comprehensive systematic review of articles released from 1999 to 2015 (January) was used as a source of scientific evidence. Recommendations were produced using a Delphi process involving a panel of 23 experts appointed by the European LeukemiaNet and European Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group. Key questions included patient selection, donor selection, pre-transplant management, conditioning regimen, post-transplant management, prevention and management of relapse after transplant. Patients with intermediate-2- or high-risk disease and age <70 years should be considered as candidates for allo-SCT. Patients with intermediate-1-risk disease and age <65 years should be considered as candidates if they present with either refractory, transfusion-dependent anemia, or a percentage of blasts in peripheral blood (PB) >2%, or adverse cytogenetics. Pre-transplant splenectomy should be decided on a case by case basis. Patients with intermediate-2- or high-risk disease lacking an human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor, should be enrolled in a protocol using HLA non-identical donors. PB was considered the most appropriate source of hematopoietic stem cells for HLA-matched sibling and unrelated donor transplants. The optimal intensity of the conditioning regimen still needs to be defined. Strategies such as discontinuation of immune-suppressive drugs, donor lymphocyte infusion or both were deemed appropriate to avoid clinical relapse. In conclusion, we provided consensus-based recommendations aimed to optimize allo-SCT in PMF. Unmet clinical needs were highlighted.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant vs.Janus kinase inhibition in the treatment of primary myelofibrosis or myelofibrosis after essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera

Primary myelofibrosis is one of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is the member of that group with the worst survival and the most significant limitations in quality of life. Hepatosplenomegaly due to extramedullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms, and cytopenias are the main manifestations. The natural history is highly variable, and up to 30% of patients can experience acceleration to acute myelogenous leukemia. Conventional therapy is only palliative and not always effective. However, huge advances have been achieved in the past 2 decades toward a better understanding of the pathogenesis of this disease, as well as improved management. Powerful risk stratification systems are now available and can reliably separate the patients into different prognostic categories to aid clinical management. Allogeneic stem cell transplant can offer cure but is still not universally applicable owing to the treatment-related mortality and toxicity. Nevertheless, outcomes of transplant are improving, owing to the introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens and the optimization of remission monitoring techniques and relapse prevention strategies. The discovery of the V617F mutation of JAK2 (Janus kinase 2) and some other molecular aberrations has shed more light on the molecular pathogenesis of the disease and has led to the introduction of novel therapies such as JAK2 inhibitors. In fact, JAK inhibitors have shown promising symptomatic efficacy, and the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib has also shown a potential survival benefit. Future effort should be made to combine allogeneic stem cell transplant with JAK inhibition.

Effect of conditioning regimens on graft failure in myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis

In myelofibrosis, the introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) preceding allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) resulted in lower transplant-related mortality rates compared with myeloablative conditioning. However, lowering the intensity of conditioning may increase the risk of graft failure in myelofibrosis, although hitherto this has not been indisputably proven. We here report the outcome of 53 patients who underwent allogeneic SCT with different conditioning regimens (RIC and non-myeloablative (NMA)) in three transplantation centers in the Netherlands. The cumulative incidence of graft failure within 60 days after SCT was high (28%), and this was primarily associated with the intensity of the conditioning regimen. Cumulative neutrophil engraftment at 60 days was lower in patients who received NMA conditioning compared with those who received RIC (56% vs 84%, P=0.03). Furthermore, of six patients who received a second transplantation after graft failure, the three patients with RIC regimens subsequently engrafted, whereas the three patients who received a second NMA regimen did not. This study indicates that in myelofibrosis, NMA regimens result in high engraftment failure rates. We propose the use of more intensive conditioning regimens, incorporating busulfan or melphalan.

Role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myeloproliferative disease

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders. While some MPN patients have an indolent course, all are at risk of progressing to severe marrow failure or transforming into acute leukemia. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only potential curative therapy. Major pre-transplant risk factors are disease stage of the MPN, the presence of comorbid conditions and the use of HLA non-identical donors. The development of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has allowed for successful allo-HCT even for older patients and patients with comorbid conditions. The pre-transplant use of JAK2 inhibitors, which may be effective in down staging a patient's disease, may improve the outcomes following allo-HCT.

Controversies and dilemmas in allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis

JAK1/2 inhibitors have broadened the therapeutic options in myelofibrosis. Though not curative, they result in a meaningful clinical benefit with relatively fewer side effects. In contrast, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative option, but is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hence, an important question is the optimal timing of HCT in the era of JAK inhibitors. Timing of HCT is a crucial decision, and need to be individualized based on the personal preferences and goals of therapy; in addition to patient, disease, and transplant related factors. Risk stratification by the currently established prognostic scoring systems need to be further refined by incorporation of prognostically significant mutations to guide the treatment choices better. Data on use of JAK inhibitors prior to HCT have just started to emerge. We discuss some of the current controversies and dilemmas in transplantation for myelofibrosis based on a few real life scenarios.

An update on allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasms in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are a category of diseases that have been traditionally amenable to allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation. Current developments in drug therapy have delayed transplantation for more advanced phases of the disease, especially for patients with CML, whereas transplantation remains a mainstream treatment modality for patients with advanced myelofibrosis and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Reduced-intensity conditioning has decreased the treatment-related mortality, and advances in the use of alternative donors for transplantation could extend the use of this procedure to an increasing number of patients with improved safety and efficacy. Here we review the current knowledge about allogeneic transplantation for myeloproliferative neoplasms and discuss the most important aspects to be considered when contemplating transplantation for patients with these diseases. Janus kinase 2 inhibitors offer the promise to improve spleen size and performance of patients with myelofibrosis and extend transplantation for patients with more advanced disease.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis using fludarabine-, intravenous busulfan- and low-dose TBI-based conditioning

Graft failure is one of the major barriers to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in myelofibrosis (MF). We report our institutional experience with 27 MF patients who underwent HCT using fludarabine-, intravenous BU- and low-dose total body irradiation (FBT)-based reduced-intensity (n=20) or full-intensity (n=7) conditioning regimens. Eight patients had prior exposure to JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy; six patients received JAK1/2 inhibitors leading on to HCT and two patients received transplant at the failure of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy. No adverse impact of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy was observed on early post-transplant outcomes. All evaluable patients had neutrophil recovery, and no primary graft failure was observed. Cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 was 48% (95% confidence interval (CI), 29-67%) and chronic GVHD at 2 years was 66% (95% CI, 49-84%). Cumulative incidences of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse and probability of OS at 2 years were: 43% (95% CI, 12-74%), 10% (95% CI, 0-39%) and 56% (95% CI, 28-77%), respectively. FBT-based conditioning regimen has a favorable impact on engraftment; however, further efforts are required to reduce NRM.

Allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis: for whom, when, and what are the true benefits?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for myelofibrosis. Despite improved outcomes, morbidity and mortality of HSCT remain high. Here we examine recent data on patient selection, timing, and outcomes of HSCT in myelofibrosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

While there is a general effort to restrict HSCT to transplant-eligible intermediate-2 and high-risk patients, this group has comparatively worse HSCT outcomes, largely driven by their high transplant-related mortality (TRM). When adjusted for age, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) has shown superior outcomes compared with myeloablative conditioning (MAC), making RIC-HSCT a viable option for older patients. Emerging concepts include the use of ruxolitinib pretransplant, optimizing MAC to decrease toxicity, and use of posttransplant JAK2-mutant allele burden to guide prophylactic immunotherapy to prevent relapse. The recognition of prognostic significance of somatic mutations in the ASXL1, EZH2, SRSF2, and IDH1/2 genes, and the improved assessment of risk of leukemic transformation have added a new dimension to risk stratification.

SUMMARY

Improving our understanding of molecular genetics and leukemic transformation holds promise for more precise patient selection for HSCT. Although RIC-HSCT may reduce TRM, further studies are needed to optimize conditioning regimens and to define the optimal timing of HSCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia transformed to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the MPN Subcommittee of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

The clinical course of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia is potentially associated with long-term severe complications, such as evolution to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is currently the only potentially curative treatment for advanced polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia. We analyzed 250 consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of polycythemia vera (n=120) or essential thrombocythemia (n=130), who underwent transplantation due to progression to myelofibrosis (n=193) or acute myeloid leukemia (n=57) and who were reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry between 1994 and 2010. Their median age was 56 years (range, 22-75) and in 52% of cases the interval between diagnosis and transplantation was 10 years or more. With a median follow-up from transplantation of 13 months, the 3-year overall survival rate and relapse incidence were 55% and 32%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the main parameters that negatively affected post-transplantation outcomes were older age (>55 years), a diagnosis at transplant of acute myeloid leukemia and the use of an unrelated donor. The overall 3-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality was 28%, but was significantly higher in older patients than in younger ones (>55 years, 35% versus 20%, P=0.032), in those transplanted from an unrelated donor rather than a related donor (34% versus 18%, P=0.034) and in patients with a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia compared to myelofibrosis (29% versus 27%, P=0.045). This large retrospective study confirms that transplantation is potentially curative for patients with end-stage polycythemia vera/essential thrombocythemia progressing to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Relapse and non-relapse mortality remain unsolved problems for which innovative treatment approaches need to be assessed.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in patients pretreated with the JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib

The Janus-activated kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is effective in decreasing symptomatic splenomegaly and myelofibrosis (MF)-related symptoms. However, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) remains the only curative option. We evaluated the impact of ruxolitinib on the outcome after HCT. A cohort of 14 patients (median age 58 years) received a subsequent graft from related (n=3) and unrelated (n=11) donors after a median exposure of 6.5 months to ruxolitinib. At HCT, MF risk for survival according to the International Prognostic Scoring System was intermediate-2 or high risk in 86% of patients. Under ruxolitinib, MF-related symptoms were ameliorated in 10 (71.4%) patients and the palpable spleen reduced by a median of 41% in 7 (64%) of 11 patients with splenomegaly. Engraftment occurred in 13 (93%) patients. Acute GvHD grade-III occurred in 2 (14%) patients. Median follow-up was 9 months. Survival, EFS and treatment-related mortality were 78.6, 64 and 7%, respectively. Through the anti-JAK-mediated reduction in both cytokines and splenomegaly as well as improvement in performance status, ruxolitinib might improve outcome after allogeneic HCT in patients with MF. The downregulation of inflammatory cytokines might have a beneficial impact on graft failure and acute GvHD.

Treatment options for myelofibrosis and myeloproliferative neoplasia

SUMMARY Essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and primary myelofibrosis belong to the Philadelphia chromosome negative (Ph-) myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) group of diseases. MPNs are clonal bone marrow stem cell disorders characterized by a proliferation of one or more of the myeloid, erythroid or megakaryocytic cell lines. The treatment of MPN patients should be carried out according to their risk stratification. In 2005 a mutation in the JAK2 gene was discovered that generated more insight into the pathogenetic working mechanism of MPNs. However, the treatment of MPN patients is still mainly only palliative, although progress is being made in reducing the symptoms for MPN patients. This review will give a general overview of the treatment of MPN patients.

Allogeneic transplantation for primary myelofibrosis with BM, peripheral blood or umbilical cord blood: an analysis of the JSHCT

To determine whether a difference in donor source affects the outcome of transplantation for patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF), a retrospective study was conducted using the national registry data on patients who received first allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with related BM (n=19), related PBSCs (n=25), unrelated BM (n=28) or unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB; n=11). The 5-year OS rates after related BM, related PBSC and unrelated BM transplantation were 63%, 43% and 41%, respectively, and the 2-year OS rate after UCB transplantation was 36%. On multivariate analysis, the donor source was not a significant factor for predicting the OS rate. Instead, performance status (PS) ⩾2 (vs PS 0–1) predicted a lower OS (P=0.044), and RBC transfusion ⩾20 times before transplantation (vs transfusion ⩽9 times) showed a trend toward a lower OS (P=0.053). No advantage of nonmyeloablative preconditioning regimens in terms of decreasing nonrelapse mortality or increasing OS was found. Allogeneic HCT, and even unrelated BM and UCB transplantation, provides a curative treatment for PMF patients.

Splenic irradiation as a component of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis with massive splenomegaly

Primary myelofibrosis is a hematologic neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. A similar clinical condition can occur at late stage of myeloproliferative neoplasms such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative strategy for both conditions, massive splenomegaly frequently observed in patients with myelofibrosis is considered to be a risk factor for graft failure or engraftment delay after transplantation. A proportion of patients can benefit from splenectomy before transplantation but such procedures have been associated with substantial surgical morbidity. Here, we report two elderly patients with myelofibrosis who received scheduled splenic irradiation for massive splenomegaly immediately prior to allogeneic HSCT instead of undergoing splenectomy. The first patient was a 60-year-old woman who received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis from an HLA-identical sibling; the second patient was a 60-year-old man who received unrelated bone marrow transplantation for primary myelofibrosis. After receiving fractionated splenic irradiation and fludarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, these patients showed remarkable reduction of their splenomegaly at the time of transplantation. They attained successful donor cell engraftment without severe complications related to splenic irradiation, while improvement in splenomegaly was durable. Our experience suggests that splenic irradiation before allogeneic HSCT might be a safe and effective alternative to splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with massive splenomegaly in terms of reducing the risk of surgical morbidity.

Effects of spleen status on early outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation

To assess the impact of spleen status on engraftment, and early morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), we analyzed 9,683 myeloablative allograft recipients from 1990 to 2006; 472 had prior splenectomy (SP), 300 splenic irradiation (SI), 1,471 with splenomegaly (SM), and 7,440 with normal spleen (NS). Median times to neutrophil engraftment (NE) and platelet engraftment (PE) were 15 vs 18 days and 22 vs 24 days for the SP and NS groups, respectively (P<0.001). Hematopoietic recovery at day +100 was not different across all groups, however the odds ratio of days +14 and +21 NE and day +28 PE were 3.26, 2.25 and 1.28 for SP, and 0.56, 0.55, and 0.82 for SM groups compared to NS (P<0.001), respectively. Among patients with SM, use of peripheral blood grafts improved NE at day +21, and CD34+ cell dose >5.7 × 10(6)/kg improved PE at day+28. After adjusting variables by Cox regression, the incidence of GVHD and OS were not different among groups. SM is associated with delayed engraftment, whereas SP prior to HCT facilitates early engraftment without having an impact on survival.

Molecular pathways: Jak/STAT pathway: mutations, inhibitors, and resistance

Aberrant activation of the JAK/STAT pathway has been reported in a variety of disease states, including inflammatory conditions, hematologic malignancies, and solid tumors. For instance, a large proportion of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) carry the acquired gain-of-function JAK2 V617F somatic mutation. This knowledge has dramatically improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of MPNs and has facilitated the development of therapeutics capable of suppressing the constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, now recognized as a common underlying biologic abnormality in MPNs. Ruxolitinib is an oral JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that has recently been approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and has been tested against other hematologic malignancies. A series of agents with different specificities against different members of the JAK family of proteins is currently undergoing evaluation in clinical trials for patients with MPNs, lymphoma, and solid tumors such as breast or pancreatic cancer. Despite the significant clinical activity exhibited by these agents in myelofibrosis, some patients fail to respond or progress during JAK kinase inhibitor therapy. Recent reports have shed light into the mechanisms of resistance to JAK inhibitor therapy. Several approaches hold promise to overcome such resistance.

Emerging drugs for myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF), a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm, is a life-threatening heterogeneous disorder characterized by dysregulation of the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling network. The clinical hallmarks of MF are progressive splenomegaly, anemia and debilitating symptoms attributable to ineffective hematopoiesis and excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the pathogenesis, clinical features and current treatment of MF, clinical data for ruxolitinib, a potent oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor and the only therapy approved for the treatment of MF, and agents in development for the treatment of MF. Information was derived from relevant MF articles identified in the published literature and abstracts of recent congresses.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib reduces spleen size and alleviates MF-related symptoms, thereby improving quality of life. Ruxolitinib may increase the risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia and does not appear to reverse bone marrow fibrosis. Studies are exploring ruxolitinib dosing strategies for patients with low platelet counts and combination therapies. Several other JAK inhibitors and other agents (i.e., immunomodulators, antifibrotic agents, anti-anemia agents, mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors, epigenetic modifiers, pegylated interferon-α2a) to treat various aspects of MF (i.e., to improve blood counts or forestall marrow fibrosis) are in early clinical development.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors

The discovery of JAK2617F mutation paved the way for the development of small molecule inhibitors of JAK1/2 resulting in first approved JAK1/2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, for the treatment of patients with myelofibrosis (MF). Although JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy is effective in decreasing the burden of symptoms associated with splenomegaly and MF-related constitutional symptoms, it is neither curative nor effective in reducing the risk of leukemic transformation. Presently, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only curative therapy for MF. A significant risk of regimen-related toxicities, graft failure, and GVHD are major barriers to the success of HCT in MF. Because of significant HCT-associated morbidity and mortality, divergent opinions regarding its appropriate role in this clinical situation have emerged. In this review, the risk-benefit ratios of modern drug therapy compared with HCT in MF patients are analyzed. A risk-adapted approach individualized to each patient's biologic characteristics and comorbidities is described, which is currently warranted in determining optimal treatment strategies for patients with MF. Inclusion of JAK1/2 inhibitor therapy in future transplant conditioning regimens may provide an opportunity to overcome some of these barriers, resulting in greater success with HCT for MF patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplant for myelofibrosis patients over age 60: likely impact of the JAK2 inhibitors

The myeloproliferative neoplasm, myelofibrosis (MF), has only one therapeutic intervention that is potentially curative in these individuals, specifically that of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT has been utilized up to this juncture, primarily in younger individuals with higher risk disease. There is more limited data on outcomes in individuals over the age of 60 years. The choice of an individualized therapeutic intervention for a patient with MF is a very complex issue and is dependent on several factors. The first factor being their overall prognosis with their illness (which can vary from a median of 2 years in high-risk patients to over 10 years in low-risk patients) and the potential impact of a therapeutic intervention not only on survival but also on quality of life. Current available therapies have been strictly palliative for disease-associated anemia and/or splenomegaly. At present, we have a new generation of inhibitors of JAK2 (Ruxolitinib, CYT387, SB1518, TG101348, with others in development), which have been shown to improve splenomegaly, improve symptomatic burden of illness and improve quality of life. In addition, these inhibitors of JAK2 may have an impact on the natural history of MF, but confirmation of the presence and degree of this impact is still pending. Clinical availability of JAK2 inhibitors may alter the timing of transplant in marginal transplant candidates (that is, those over the age of 60), may have a role preceding ASCT to improve spleen size and performance status before transplant and might be frontline therapy in intermediate and high-risk patients who are not candidates for ASCT.

Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System scores, pre-transplant therapy and chronic graft-versus-host disease determine outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative stem cell disorder curable exclusively by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess disease-specific and transplant-related risk factors that influence post-transplant outcome in patients with myelofibrosis.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 76 consecutive patients with primary (n=47) or secondary (n=29) myelofibrosis who underwent bone marrow (n=6) or peripheral blood stem cell (n=70) transplantation from sibling (n=30) or unrelated (n=46) donors between January 1994 and December 2010. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 55 ± 7.5 months.

RESULTS

Primary graft failure occurred in 5% and the non-relapse mortality rate at 1 year was 28%. The relapse-free survival rate was 50% with a relapse rate of 19% at 5 years. The use of pharmacological pre-treatment and the post-transplant occurrence of chronic graft-versus-host disease were significant independent unfavourable risk factors for post-transplant survival in multivariate analysis. Using the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for risk stratification, low-risk patients had significantly better overall survival (P=0.014, hazard ratio 1.4) and relapse-free survival (P=0.02, hazard ratio 1.3) compared to the other risk groups of patients. The additional inclusion of thrombocytopenia, abnormal karyotype and transfusion need (Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System Plus) resulted in a predicted 5-year overall survival of 100%, 51%, 54% and 30% for low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high-risk groups, respectively. The relapse incidence was significantly higher in the absence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (P=0.006), and pharmacological pre-treatment (n=43) was associated with reduced relapse-free survival (P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The data corroborate a strong correlation between alloreactivity and long-term post-transplant disease control and confirm an inverse relationship between disease stage, pharmacotherapy and outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis. The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System was demonstrated to be useful for risk stratification of patients with myelofibrosis who are to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis in 2012

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a heterogeneous disease for which long-term, effective medical therapeutic options are currently limited. The role of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) in this population, many of whom are elderly, often provides a challenge with regard to the identification of suitable candidates, timing of transplantation in the disease course and choice of conditioning regimen. This review summarizes key findings from published data concerning AHSCT in MF and attempts to provide a state of the art approach to MF-AHSCT in 2012. In addition, we postulate on how the era of JAK inhibition might impact on transplantation for MF.

How to manage the transplant question in myelofibrosis

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis. Despite advances in transplant, the morbidity and the mortality of the procedure necessitate careful patient selection. In this manuscript, we describe the new prognostic scoring system to help select appropriate patients for transplant and less aggressive therapies. We explore the advances in non-transplant therapy, such as with investigational agents. We review the blossoming literature on results of myeloablative, reduced intensity and alternative donor transplantation. Finally, we make recommendations for which patients are most likely to benefit from transplantation.

Spleen deflation and beyond: the pros and cons of Janus kinase 2 inhibitor therapy for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

The myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis (MF) are malignancies that frequently harbor the recurrent somatic point mutation JAK2(V617F). The discovery of this mutation has fueled the development of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors. Available results have indicated that JAK2 inhibitors are particularly effective at reducing spleen size. However, the activity of these agents is multifaceted and also involves a marked improvement of systemic symptoms and, for those agents with dual JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitory activity, a marked reduction in the levels of circulating cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. Because JAK2 inhibitors are not specific for JAK2(V617F), responses have also been observed in JAK2(V617F) -negative MPNs because of the inhibition of wild-type JAK2, which is also likely responsible for the induction of cytopenias in patients with MF and for the normalization of peripheral blood counts observed in patients with ET or PV. Given the distinct mortality and morbidity associated with ET, PV, and MF, the use of JAK2 inhibitors appears reasonable for patients with MF as well as for those with ET or PV who have become resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. Ongoing randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials will further delineate the role of these agents in the management of patients with MPNs. The pros and cons of JAK2 kinase inhibitor therapy are herein discussed.

Myeloproliferative disorders in older people

The term myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) describes a group of conditions in which an intrinsic stem cell defect is present in the bone marrow. This leads to hypercellularity in one or more of the myeloid cell lines (red blood cells, platelets, granulocytes and their precursors), or increased bone marrow fibrosis. MPDs are rare; combined annual incidence is 6 per 100,000.

MPDs may present in asymptomatic patients as an incidental finding, or may be associated with constitutional features such as weight loss, sweats or lethargy. Splenomegaly is common but lymphadenopathy is not a feature. The most significant complications are: arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, secondary marrow fibrosis and transformation to acute myeloblastic leukaemia (AML). Treatment aims to reduce the risk of such complications.

Recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders have radically changed the approach to the diagnosis of MPD and are the focus of new treatment developments.

How to manage polycythemia vera

My diagnostic approach in case of isolated erythrocytosis is based on the visit and the interview of patients, and on checking the causes of secondary erythrocytosis. If causes of secondary erythrocytosis are not evident and serum erythropoietin level is low-normal, I study JAK2 mutations. In the case of a patient with erythrocytosis and other signs of myeloproliferation, such as leukocytosis, thrombocytosis or splenomegaly, the diagnosis of polycythemia vera (PV) is likely, and I test serum erythropoietin and JAK2 mutations first. I stratify patients at diagnosis of PV according to age and history of thrombosis. I start hydroxyurea for patients who are at a high risk of thrombosis (that is, with one or two risk factors), while I continue only phlebotomy in other cases. All PV patients, if not contraindicated, receive aspirin. I follow up patients monthly until normalization of their blood cell counts or splenomegaly, and afterwards every 2 months with visit, cell blood count and blood smear evaluation. After diagnosis, I perform bone marrow biopsy only in the case of clinical signs of disease evolution.

New JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

The discovery of the JAK(V617F) kinase established a common pathogenetic link to the most important types of Philadelphia-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs): polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). More importantly, the demonstration of constitutive kinase activity emanating from the JAK2 protein provided the rationale for the development of small-molecule JAK2 kinase inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

Several JAK2 kinase inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials for patients with MPNs. In PMF trials, JAK2 inhibitors have been shown to produce rapid reductions in spleen size and marked improvements in constitutional symptoms and quality of life. In ET and/or PV, JAK2 inhibitors normalize hematocrit, platelets and WBC, and spleen size in a large number of patients that are resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. JAK2 inhibitors are not specific for the JAK2V617F mutant protein. Rather, they inhibit the JAK2- signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway and therefore any patient with MPN may benefit from therapy regardless of JAK2 mutational status.

EXPERT OPINION

JAK2 inhibitors induce clinically relevant responses in a large proportion of patients with MPNs. Because JAK kinase activation underlies the pathogenesis of other disorders, such as autoimmune and rheumatological disorders, the paradigm of JAK inhibition may translate into novel therapies for a variety of human diseases.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic myelofibrosis in Australia and New Zealand: older recipients receiving myeloablative conditioning at increased mortality risk

This retrospective registry analysis examined predictive factors for outcome in 57 patients who underwent allogeneic or syngeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for chronic myelofibrosis (CM), either primary (n = 49) or following an antecedent condition (n = 8), reported to the Australasian Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (ABMTRR) between 1993 and 2005. During the 6 years 2000 to 2005, 40 HCTs were performed for CM compared with 17 in the 7 years 1993 to 1999. Twenty-four recipients (42%) were age 50 or over at transplantation; all of these patients were transplanted after 1997, and 15 were given reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) pretransplantation. The cumulative incidence of transplantation-related mortality was 18% at 100 days and 25% at 1 year posttransplantation. Up to 1 year posttransplantation 16 patients died, with the most common causes being infection (n = 6) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (n = 5). A total of 27 patients survived for 3 years or longer posttransplantation. None of these patients required regular red blood cell transfusions, and of the 17 who had not had splenectomies, none had detectable splenomegaly. Twelve patients had no detectable bone marrow fibrosis, 7 had grade 1 fibrosis, and in 8 patients no information was available. The overall survival (OS) probability for all patients was 72% at 1 year and 58% at 5 years posttransplantation. Patients age 50 and over who received myeloablative conditioning fared poorly, with 1-year overall actuarial survival of 44% compared with 77% for all other patients (P = .007). In multivariate analysis, age 50 years and over at transplantation was the only significant independent unfavorable risk factor for survival post-HCT (hazard ratio 2.71, 95% confidence interval 1.16-6.34, P = .02). This study shows a clear increase in annual numbers of allogeneic HCT performed for CM in Australia and New Zealand in recent years. Five-year survival was favorable compared with international studies, but for older recipients who received myeloablative conditioning, mortality risk was elevated.

Experimental therapeutics for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasias

Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by stem cell-derived, unrestrained clonal myeloproliferation. The World Health Organization classification system, proposed in 2008, identifies 7 distinct categories of Ph-negative MPNs including essential thrombocythemia (ET); polycythemia vera (PV); primary myelofibrosis (PMF); mastocytosis; chronic eosinophilic leukemia; chronic neutrophilic leukemia; and MPN, unclassifiable. For many years, the treatment of ET, PV, and PMF, the most frequently diagnosed Ph-negative MPNs, has been largely supportive. In recent years, that paradigm has been challenged because of the discovery of a recurrent point mutation in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene (JAK2(V617F)). This mutation can be detected in the vast majority of patients with PV and approximately half of patients with ET or PMF and serves as both a diagnostic marker as well as representing a putative molecular target for drug development. Several putative targeted agents with significant in vitro JAK2 inhibitory activity and various degrees of JAK2 specificity are currently undergoing clinical evaluation. Furthermore, other investigational non-tyrosine kinase inhibitor approaches such as immunomodulatory agents and pegylated interferon- have also shown promising results in MPNs.

Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasias and beyond

Recent advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis of the Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, polycythaemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia and myelofibrosis have led to the identification of the mutation V617F in Janus kinase (JAK) as a potential therapeutic target. This information has prompted the development of ATP-competitive JAK2 inhibitors. Therapy with JAK2 inhibitors may induce rapid and marked reductions in spleen size and can lead to remarkable improvements in constitutional symptoms and overall quality of life. Because JAKs are involved in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and immune-mediated disorders, JAK inhibitors are also being tested in clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis, as well as for the treatment of other autoimmune diseases and for the prevention of allograft rejection. Preliminary results indicate that these agents hold great promise for the treatment of JAK-driven disorders.

How I treat myelofibrosis

It is currently assumed that myelofibrosis (MF) originates from acquired mutations that target the hematopoietic stem cell and induce dysregulation of kinase signaling, clonal myeloproliferation, and abnormal cytokine expression. These pathogenetic processes are interdependent and also individually contributory to disease phenotype-bone marrow stromal changes, extramedullary hematopoiesis, ineffective erythropoiesis, and constitutional symptoms. Molecular pathogenesis of MF is poorly understood despite a growing list of resident somatic mutations that are either functionally linked to Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription hyperactivation (eg JAK2, MPL, and LNK mutations) or possibly involved in epigenetic dysregulation of transcription (TET2, ASXL1, or EZH2 mutations). Current prognostication in primary MF is based on the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus model, which uses 8 independent predictors of inferior survival to classify patients into low, intermediate 1, intermediate 2, and high-risk disease groups; corresponding median survivals are estimated at 15.4, 6.5, 2.9, and 1.3 years. Such information is used to plan a risk-adapted treatment strategy for the individual patient, which might include observation alone, conventional or investigational (eg, JAK inhibitors, pomalidomide) drug therapy, allogenic stem cell transplantation with reduced- or conventional-intensity conditioning, splenectomy, or radiotherapy. I discuss these treatment approaches in the context of who should get what and when.