A phase II study of sirolimus, tacrolimus and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin as GVHD prophylaxis after unrelated-donor PBSC transplant

Precision sirolimus dosing in children: The potential for model-informed dosing and novel drug monitoring

The mTOR inhibitor sirolimus is prescribed to treat children with varying diseases, ranging from vascular anomalies to sporadic lymphangioleiomyomatosis to transplantation (solid organ or hematopoietic cell). Precision dosing of sirolimus using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of sirolimus concentrations in whole blood drawn at the trough (before the next dose) time-point is the current standard of care. For sirolimus, trough concentrations are only modestly correlated with the area under the curve, with R 2 values ranging from 0.52 to 0.84. Thus, it should not be surprising, even with the use of sirolimus TDM, that patients treated with sirolimus have variable pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and effectiveness. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) will be beneficial and should be implemented. The data do not suggest dried blood spots point-of-care sampling of sirolimus concentrations for precision dosing of sirolimus. Future research on precision dosing of sirolimus should focus on pharmacogenomic and pharmacometabolomic tools to predict sirolimus pharmacokinetics and wearables for point-of-care quantitation and MIPD.

Outcomes Following Intolerance to Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although tacrolimus and sirolimus (TAC/SIR) is an accepted graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), toxicity from this regimen can lead to premature discontinuation of immunosuppression. There are limited studies reporting outcomes and subsequent treatment of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance.

OBJECTIVES

To assess outcomes of patients with TAC/SIR intolerance and guide subsequent management after intolerance.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively analyzed transplant outcomes of consecutive adult patients at Moffitt Cancer Center who received allogeneic HCT with TAC/SIR as GVHD prophylaxis from 2009 to 2018. TAC/SIR intolerance was defined as discontinuation due to toxicity of either TAC or SIR before post-transplant day 100.

RESULTS

777 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 22 (0.2-125) months. Intolerance occurred in 13% (n = 104) of patients at a median of 30 (range 5-90) days. The most common causes of intolerance were acute kidney injury (n = 53 [51%]), thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 31 [28%]), and veno-occlusive disease (n = 23 [22%]). The cumulative incidence of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD at 100 days in TAC/SIR-intolerant patients was 50% (95% CI, 39%-64%) and 25% (95% CI, 22%-29%) in patients tolerant to this regimen (P < .0001). In multivariate analyses, grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD was significantly higher in TAC/SIR-intolerant patients (HR 2.40; 95% CI, 1.59-3.61; P < .0001). Similarly, in multivariate analyses, TAC/SIR-intolerant patients had more chronic GVHD (HR 1.48, 95% CI, 1.03-2.12; P = .03). The non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year in TAC/SIR-intolerant patients was 47% (95% CI, 38%-59%) and 12% (95% CI, 10%-15%) in those tolerant to the regimen (P < .0001). The 2-year relapse free survival of TAC/SIR-intolerant patients was 35% (95% CI, 25%-44%) and 60% (95% CI, 57%-65%) among TAC/SIR-tolerant patients, (HR 2.30; 95% CI, 1.61-3.28; P < .0001). Intolerance stratified by early (≤30 days) versus late (31-100 days) significantly affected the cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 75% (early [95% CI, 59%-94%]) versus 33% ([late] 95% CI, 21%-50%) (P = .001) as well as the cumulative incidence of NRM at 61% ([early] 95% CI, 48%-77%) versus 35% ([late] 95% CI, 24%-51%) (P = .006). After developing TAC/SIR intolerance, most patients were switched to an alternative 2-drug regimen (71/104 [68%]), with the most common being mycophenolate mofetil in addition to continuing TAC or SIR (68/71 [96%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, TAC/SIR intolerance was associated with poorer outcomes. Early intolerance contributed to higher risk of acute GVHD, increased NRM, and inferior survival. Patients with early intolerance were often switched to an alternative agent, and patients with late intolerance tended to be continued on single-drug therapy without substitution. Single-drug versus 2-drug regimens after intolerance did not appear to affect outcomes. Management strategies to mitigate the risks of intolerance are warranted.

The impact of different doses of antithymocyte globulin conditioning on immune reconstitution upon hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) is used prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Two different ATG doses (7.5 or 10 mg/kg) were evaluated in comparison with a group without ATG therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 132 patients who were transplanted with HSCT without ATG (non-ATG), or who received 7.5 mg/kg ATG (ATG-7.5) or 10 mg/kg ATG (ATG-10) prior to transplantation. The immune cells (CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells, CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells, CD19⁺ B cells and CD16⁺CD56⁺ NK cells) were examined in peripheral blood every three months post-HSCT for 12 months.

RESULTS

Compared with non-ATG group, combined ATG-7.5/ATG-10 groups had significantly lower CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells and higher CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells at 3, 6, 9, 12 months post-HSCT; thus, displaying a lower CD4/CD8 ratio in the ATG groups compared to non-ATG group. The ratio of CD19⁺ B cells was statistically lower (at 3rd month, p = .014; at 6th month, p = .025) in combined ATG-7.5/ATG-10 groups at 3 and 6 months post-HSCT, but not at 9 and 12 months after HSCT. The ratios of CD3⁺CD4⁺ T cells, CD3⁺CD8⁺ T cells, CD19⁺ B cells and CD16⁺CD56⁺ NK cells were similar between the ATG-7.5 and ATG-10 groups at all examined time points. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse and acute GVHD (aGVHD) were comparable among recipients without ATG therapy and with ATG-7.5 or/and ATG-10 therapies. Multivariate analysis revealed that immune cells ratios were not independent factors affecting prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The ATG therapy at higher and lower doses led to a delayed reconstitution of T cells and the inversion of CD4/CD8 ratio for at least one year after HSCT.

Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibition for Prophylaxis of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4; also known as CD26), a transmembrane receptor expressed on T cells, has a costimulatory function in activating T cells. In a mouse model, down-regulation of CD26 prevented graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) but preserved graft-versus-tumor effects. Whether inhibition of DPP-4 with sitagliptin may prevent acute GVHD after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation is not known.

METHODS

We conducted a two-stage, phase 2 clinical trial to test whether sitagliptin plus tacrolimus and sirolimus would reduce the incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD from 30% to no more than 15% by day 100. Patients received myeloablative conditioning followed by mobilized peripheral-blood stem-cell transplants. Sitagliptin was given orally at a dose of 600 mg every 12 hours starting the day before transplantation until day 14 after transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients who could be evaluated, with a median age of 46 years (range, 20 to 59), received transplants from matched related or unrelated donors. Acute GVHD occurred in 2 of 36 patients by day 100; the incidence of grade II to IV GVHD was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1 to 16), and the incidence of grade III or IV GVHD was 3% (95% CI, 0 to 12). Nonrelapse mortality was zero at 1 year. The 1-year cumulative incidences of relapse and chronic GVHD were 26% (95% CI, 13 to 41) and 37% (95% CI, 22 to 53), respectively. GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 46% (95% CI, 29 to 62) at 1 year. Toxic effects were similar to those seen in patients undergoing allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nonrandomized trial, sitagliptin in combination with tacrolimus and sirolimus resulted in a low incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD by day 100 after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02683525.).

Long-term Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation From Unrelated Donor Using Tacrolimus/Sirolimus-based GvHD Prophylaxis: Impact of HLA Mismatch

BACKGROUND

While tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S)-based graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis has been effective in preventing acute GvHD post hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), its efficacy and long-term outcome in matched (MUD) and mismatched unrelated donor (mMUD) setting is not well defined.

METHODS

Herein, we evaluated a consecutive case-series of 482 patients who underwent unrelated donor HCT (2005-2013) with T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range = 2.4-11.3), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and relapse/progression-free survival were 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.0-52.0) and 43.6% (95% CI: 39.1-48.1), respectively; and the 5-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse were 24.9%, and 31.5%, respectively. In this cohort, mMUD was associated with worse OS (39.0% versus 50.7% at 5 y; P = 0.034), primarily due to greater risk of NRM (33.5% versus 21.7%; P = 0.038). While rates of relapse, acute (II-IV or III-IV) or chronic GvHD (limited or extensive) were not different, death caused by chronic GvHD (20.8% versus 12.8%; P = 0.022) and infection (33.0% versus 18.1%; P < 0.01) were significantly greater in mMUD. In multivariable analysis, high-risk disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.21, 95% CI: 1.16-4.23; P < 0.01) and mMUD (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.15-2.08; P = 0.004) were independent predictive factors for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

T/S-based GvHD prophylaxis is an effective and acceptable GvHD prophylactic regimen. However, survival after mMUD remained poor, possibly related to the severity of chronic GvHD.

Tacrolimus in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the most common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); therefore, the prevention of GVHD is important for a successful treatment. Tacrolimus (Tac), a calcineurin inhibitor, has been widely used for the prophylaxis of GVHD in HSCT recipients. Areas covered: This review introduces phase II/III of clinical trials related with Tac's roles in the prevention of GVHD in HSCT. Furthermore, we discuss the normal ranges of Tac concentrations, pharmacogenetics, and drug interactions of Tac, as well as its side effects in adult HSCT recipients. Expert opinion: A series of studies has established the efficacy and safety of Tac alone or in combination with other agents in HSCT. However, successful administration of Tac is complicated by its narrow therapeutic window, inter-patient pharmacokinetic variability, and a spectrum of undesirable side effects. It is necessary to maintain concentrations of Tac within the desired ranges for GVHD prophylaxis. Moreover, various factors contribute to significant variability in Tac pharmacokinetics, including drug interactions and genomic variation.

Antithymocyte globulin for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a limiting factor for successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Conflicting data exist on the benefit of ATG on post-transplant survival. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess benefits and harms of thymoglobulin and Fresenius (re-branded as Grafalon) ATG formulations in patients undergoing allo-HCT for a variety of hematologic malignancies and bone marrow failure syndromes. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed. Data on methodological quality, benefits, and harms were extracted for each trial and pooled under a random-effects model. Eight RCTs (1134 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality ranged from moderate to very low. Pooled results showed no difference in overall survival (OS) with the use of ATG (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.74-1.28; P = 0.83). ATG reduced grade II/III acute GVHD (risk ratio (RR) = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.48-0.77; P < 0.0001), grade III/IV acute GVHD (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.34-0.81; P = 0.004), and chronic GVHD (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40-0.69; P < 0.00001) without an increase in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.74-1.13; P = 0.40). Future studies with better methodological quality are needed to provide conclusive answers related to optimal dosing and timing of ATG for prevention of GVHD.

Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent and Refractory Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with BEAM Conditioning and Sirolimus- and Tacrolimus-Based GVHD Prophylaxis

The current standard of care for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is high-dose conditioning followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). For some patients (ie, those with highest-risk disease, insufficient stem cell numbers after mobilization, or bone marrow involvement) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers the potential for cure. However, the majority of patients undergoing alloHCT receive reduced-intensity conditioning as a preparative regimen, and studies assessing outcomes of patients after alloHCT with myeloablative conditioning are limited. In this retrospective study, we reviewed outcomes of 22 patients with recurrent and refractory NHL who underwent alloHCT with myeloablative BEAM conditioning and received tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at City of Hope between 2005 and 2018. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 1.0 to 11.2 years), the probabilities of 2-year overall survival and event-free survival were 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.0% to 75.8%) and 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4% to 64.3%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 45.5% (95% CI, 23.8% to 64.9%), with only 1 patient developing grade IV acute GVHD. However, chronic GVHD was seen in 55% of the patients (n = 12). Of the 22 eligible patients, 2 had undergone previous ASCT and 2 had undergone previous alloHCT. Both patients with previous ASCT developed severe regimen-related toxicity. Patients who underwent alloHCT with chemorefractory disease had lower survival rates, with 1-year OS and EFS of 44.4% and 33.0%, respectively. In conclusion, alloHCT with a BEAM preparative regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD should be considered as an alternative option for patients with highest-risk lymphoma whose outcomes are expectedly poor after ASCT.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenomics of Immunosuppressants in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Part II

Part I of this article included a pertinent review of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the role of postgraft immunosuppression in alloHCT, and the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of the calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate. In this article (Part II), we review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenomics of mycophenolic acid (MPA), sirolimus, and the antithymocyte globulins (ATG). We then discuss target concentration intervention (TCI) of these postgraft immunosuppressants in alloHCT patients, with a focus on current evidence for TCI and on how TCI may improve clinical management in these patients. Currently, TCI using trough concentrations is conducted for sirolimus in alloHCT patients. Several studies demonstrate that MPA plasma exposure is associated with clinical outcomes, with an increasing number of alloHCT patients needing TCI of MPA. Compared with MPA, there are fewer pharmacokinetic/dynamic studies of rabbit ATG and horse ATG in alloHCT patients. Future pharmacokinetic/dynamic research of postgraft immunosuppressants should include '-omics'-based tools: pharmacogenomics may be used to gain an improved understanding of the covariates influencing pharmacokinetics as well as proteomics and metabolomics as novel methods to elucidate pharmacodynamic responses.

Tacrolimus plus sirolimus with or without ATG as GVHD prophylaxis in HLA-mismatched unrelated donor allogeneic stem cell transplantation

HLA-matched related or unrelated donors are not universally available. Consequently, patients can be offered hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from alternative donors, including mismatched unrelated donors (MMURD), known to cause a higher incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD. In vivo T-cell-depletion strategies, such as antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapy, significantly decrease the risk of GVHD. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study comparing tacrolimus (TAC) and sirolimus (SIR) with or without ATG in 104 patients (TAC-SIR=45, TAC-SIR-ATG=59) who underwent MMURD HSCT. Use of ATG was associated with a lower incidence, albeit not statistically significant, of grades 2-4 aGVHD (46% vs 64%, P=0.09), no difference in grades 3-4 aGVHD (10% vs 15%, P=0.43), a trend for a lower incidence of moderate/severe chronic GVHD (16% vs 37%, P=0.09) and more frequent Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (54% vs 18%, P=0.0002). There were no statistically significant differences in 3-year overall survival (OS) (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% confidence interval (CI)=24-56%) vs TAC-SIR=54% (95% CI=37-70%), P=0.43) or 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (TAC-SIR-ATG=40% (95% CI=28-58%) vs TAC-SIR=22% (95% CI=13-39%), P=0.92). An intermediate Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research disease risk resulted in a significantly lower non-relapse mortality and better OS at 3 years. Our study suggests that addition of ATG to TAC-SIR in MMURD HSCT does not affect OS when compared with TAC-SIR alone.

Sirolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil as Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis for Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

The use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to reduce the risk of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) requires intensive post-transplantation toxicity monitoring. Sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis is associated with a favorable toxicity profile and requires less intensive monitoring. However, the efficacy of sirolimus-based regimen compared with CNI-based regimen has not been evaluated in the setting of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) double umbilical cord blood (UCB) HCT. We compared outcomes of patients receiving sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 37) or cyclosporine (CSA)/MMF (n = 123) in an ongoing phase II study of RIC UCB transplantation. In multiple regression analysis, sirolimus/MMF did not influence the risk of grades II to IV or grades III and IV acute GVHD. In addition, there was no association between type of GVHD prophylaxis and hematopoietic engraftment. Infection density analysis found a significantly lower risk of infections with sirolimus/MMF between days +46 and +180 after HCT compared with CSA/MMF (3.4 versus 6.3 per 1000 patient-days, P = .03); however, no difference was observed before day +45. Sirolimus/MMF use resulted in no thrombotic microangiopathy, fewer instances of elevated serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (14% versus 45%; P <.01), and similar rates of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (2.7% versus 4%; P = .68), compared with CSA/MMF. Disease-free survival at 1 year was 51% for sirolimus/MMF and 41% for CSA/MMF (P = .41), and sirolimus/MMF use did not influence the risk of nonrelapse mortality or survival. In conclusion, sirolimus/MMF GVHD prophylaxis was better tolerated and resulted in similar rates of GVHD and survival as compared to CSA/MMF after RIC double UCB transplantation.

Fludarabine/Busulfan versus Fludarabine/Melphalan Conditioning in Patients Undergoing Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

There is at present little data to guide the choice of conditioning for patients with lymphoma undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In this study, we compared the outcomes of patients undergoing RIC SCT who received fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel), the standard RIC regimen used by the Spanish Group of Transplantation, and fludarabine and busulfan (FluBu), the standard RIC regimen used by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital. We analyzed 136 patients undergoing RIC SCT for lymphoma with either FluBu (n = 61) or FluMel (n = 75) conditioning between 2007 and 2014. Median follow-up was 36 months. The cumulative incidence of grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 13% with FluBu and 36% with FluMel (P = .002). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 1 year was 3.3% with FluBu and 31% with FluMel (P < .0001). The cumulative incidence of relapse at 1 year was 29% with FluBu and 10% with FluMel (P = .08). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 47% with FluBu and 36% with FluMel (P = .24), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 62% with FluBu and 48% with FluMel (P = .01). In multivariable analysis, FluMel was associated with a higher risk of acute grades II to IV GVHD (HR, 7.45; 95% CI, 2.30 to 24.17; P = .001) and higher risk of NRM (HR, 4.87; 95% CI, 1.36 to 17.44; P = .015). The type of conditioning was not significantly associated with relapse or disease-free survival in multivariable models. However, conditioning regimen was the only factor significantly associated with overall survival: FluMel conditioning was associated with a hazard ratio for death of 2.78 (95% CI, 1.23 to 6.27; P = .014) compared with FluBu. In conclusion, the use of FluBu as conditioning for patients undergoing SCT for lymphoma was associated with a lower risk of acute GVHD and NRM and improved overall survival when compared with FluMel in our retrospective study. These results confirm the differences between these RIC regimens in terms of toxicity and efficacy and support the need for comparative prospective studies.

Antithymocyte globulin in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: benefits and limitations

Significant advances have been made in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation by reducing toxicities and optimizing its efficacy. Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) is an important in vivo T-cell depletion strategy, which reduces the risk of graft-versus-host disease in HLA-matched or -mismatched donor allografting. ATG effectively targets alloreactive T cells at the expense of potentially increasing the risk of post-hematopoietic cell transplantation infections and delayed immune reconstitution. We summarize the targets, mechanisms, various preparations of ATG, the growing role of ATG in prevention of graft-versus-host disease in various transplant modalities as well as emerging data on pharmacokinetic modeling for individualized ATG dosing. Further research is needed to optimize the ATG administration while minimizing the toxicities.

Influence of Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion Genomic Variants on Tacrolimus/Sirolimus Blood Levels and Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allelic variants of genes implicated in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) determine the pharmacokinetic variability of many medications and are increasingly recognized as important factors determining the success or failure of medical treatments. Both tacrolimus and sirolimus have narrow therapeutic ranges maintained by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Using an ADME panel that covers >99% of the PharmaADME working group core list (188 single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] and 12 copy number variant [CNV] assays in 36 pharmacogenetically relevant genes), we studied 177 patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) using tacrolimus/sirolimus-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. We tested for possible associations between ADME variants and tacrolimus/sirolimus drug levels, concentration/dose (C/D) ratio, and clinical endpoints, including acute GVHD. A total of 62 SNP and 6 CNV assays were evaluable after removing the variants, which were homozygous in (nearly) all samples. For sirolimus, rs2032582 (ABCB1) T-carriers versus non-T-carriers were associated with higher blood levels (P = .01), with similar results for C/D ratio. Generalized estimating equation analysis supported these findings. For tacrolimus, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were associated with higher blood levels than CYP3A5*1/*1 (P = .002). By multivariable analysis, rs776746 CYP3A5*3/*3 and CYP3A5*3/*1 were independently associated with decreased acute GVHD compared with CYP3A5*1/*1, after adjustment for conditioning, donor type, race/ethnicity, and age. We demonstrated association of specific ADME genetic polymorphisms with blood levels of tacrolimus/sirolimus, and incidence of acute GVHD after HCT, in spite of TDM and dose adjustment. A larger ongoing study will determine whether these associations have clinical utility beyond TDM.

Transplantation-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Patients Treated With Sirolimus and Cyclosporine as Salvage Therapy for Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Background: Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a rare complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Because sirolimus (SIR) and calcineurin inhibitor—either cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus—have become more common as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, we are witnessing a higher frequency of this complication. Objective: To analyze the incidence, timing, and management of TA-TMA in patients who received the combination of CsA and SIR as therapy for uncontrolled GVHD in one single center. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis from February 2002 to June 2014 of the combination of SIR and CsA as salvage therapy in 61 patients with treatment-refractory or relapsed acute GVHD (n = 24) or chronic GVHD (n = 37) in a tertiary hospital. Results: A total of 61 patients received CsA and SIR as salvage therapy for acute (n = 16), late acute (n = 8), overlap syndrome (n = 22), or classic chronic (n = 15) GVHD. We identified 13 patients with TA-TMA (21.3%), and the status of GVHD was active in 11 of 13 patients. Only 1 patient showed high CsA levels, and 6 of 13 patients had very high concentrations of SIR in blood. We used an enzyme inducer in 6 patients, which proved effective in 3. Overall survival for TA-TMA patients was inferior compared to that for non TA-TMA patients at 12 months (42.9% vs 51.9%) and 24 months (34.3% vs 49.1%), although this difference was not significant. Conclusion: Prompt identification and good management of TA-TMA, with better control of GVHD, may contribute to a decrease in patient mortality that would result from this complication.

The potential role of HLA-DRB1*11 in the development and outcome of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a serious complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with high mortality rate. We retrospectively studied the frequency, clinical and genetic associations and prognostic effect of TA-TMA, in a total of 425 consecutive adult patients, who underwent allo-HSCT for a malignant haematological condition between 2007 and 2013 at our single centre. TA-TMA developed in 19% of the patients. Unrelated donor type (P<0.001), acute GvHD grades II-IV (P<0.001), myeloablative conditioning regimens (P=0.003), tacrolimus-based GvHD prophylaxis (P=0.003), CMV infection (P=0.003) and carriership for HLA-DRB1*11 (P=0.034) were associated with the development of TA-TMA. Survival was adversely affected by the presence of TA-TMA (P<0.001). Among patients with TA-TMA, the outcome of HLA-DRB1*11 carriers was significantly better compared with non-carriers (P=0.003). As a new finding, our observations suggest that the presence of HLA-DRB1*11 antigen contributes to the development of TA-TMA and affects the outcome.

GVHD prophylaxis with sirolimus-tacrolimus may overcome the deleterious effect on survival of HLA mismatch after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-SCT

Large studies, mostly based on series of patients receiving CSA/tacrolimus (TKR) plus MTX as immunoprophylaxis, have demonstrated a deleterious effect on survival of the presence of a single mismatch out of eight loci after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (alloHSCT). We retrospectively analyzed a series of 159 adult patients who received sirolimus(SRL)/TKR prophylaxis after alloHSCT. We compared overall outcomes according to HLA compatibility in A, B, C and DRB1 loci at the allele level: 7/8 (n=20) vs 8/8 (n=139). Donor type was unrelated in 95% vs 70% among 7/8 vs 8/8 pairs, respectively (P=0.01). No significant differences were observed in 3-year OS (68 vs 62%), 3-year EFS (53 vs 49%) and 1-year non-relapse mortality (9 vs 13%). Cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) was significantly higher in 7/8 alloHSCT (68% vs 42%, P<0.001) but no significant differences were found for III-IV aGVHD (4.5% vs 11%), overall (35% vs 53%) and extensive (20% vs 35%) chronic GHVD in 7/8 vs 8/8 subgroups, respectively. In summary, the present study indicates favorable outcomes after alloHSCT using the combination of SRL/TKR combination as GVHD prophylaxis with OS in the range of 55-70%, and non-significant differences in overall outcomes, irrespective of the presence of any mismatches at obligatory loci.

Sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after non-ablative or reduced intensity conditioning in related and unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant

Encouraging results have been reported with sirolimus, tacrolimus and low-dose methotrexate after non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 71 patients with lymphoid malignancies treated with this prophylaxis regimen after non-myeloablative or reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Grafts were human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related in 29 (41%), matched unrelated in 36 (51%) and 9/10 HLA-matched unrelated in six (8%) patients. The regimen was well tolerated and over 90% of patients completed the planned treatment. The cumulative incidences of 1-year grade B-D and C-D acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were 0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.39) and 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.15), respectively, and of 1- and 2-year chronic GVHD (National Institutes of Health criteria) in 70 evaluable patients were 0.15 (95% CI, 0.08-0.24) and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.22-0.44), respectively. The median day of onset of acute GVHD was 123 days (range, 17-268 days). Peri-transplant rituximab or anti-thymocyte globulin did not affect GVHD. The cumulative incidence of 1-year non-relapse mortality and relapse were 4% and 20%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 3.5 (range: 0.18-5.1) years, overall survival and progression-free survival at 2 years were 82% and 66%, respectively. This GVHD regimen results in a low incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD after reduced intensity and non-myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for lymphoid malignancies. The study also highlights the incidence of late onset acute GVHD in non-myeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning, and the contribution of the new GVHD staging system that more accurately reflects clinical outcomes.

A randomized phase II trial of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and sirolimus after non-myeloablative unrelated donor transplantation

The study is a randomized phase II trial investigating graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after non-myeloablative (90 mg/m(2) fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation) human leukocyte antigen matched unrelated donor transplantation. Patients were randomized as follows: arm 1 - tacrolimus 180 days and mycophenolate mofetil 95 days (n=69); arm 2 - tacrolimus 150 days and mycophenolate mofetil 180 days (n=71); arm 3 - tacrolimus 150 days, mycophenolate mofetil 180 days and sirolimus 80 days (n=68). All patients had sustained engraftment. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease rates in the 3 arms were 64%, 48% and 47% at Day 150, respectively (arm 3 vs. arm 1 (hazard ratio 0.62; P=0.04). Owing to the decreased incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease, systemic steroid use was lower at Day 150 in arm 3 (32% vs. 55% in arm 1 and 49% in arm 2; overall P=0.009 by hazard ratio analysis). The Day 150 incidence of cytomegalovirus reactivation was lower in arm 3 (arm 1, 54%; arm 2, 47%; arm 3, 22%; overall P=0.002 by hazard ratio analysis). Non-relapse mortality was comparable in the three arms at two years (arm 1, 26%; arm 2, 23%; arm 3, 18%). Toxicity rates and other outcome measures were similar between the three arms. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil is safe and associated with lower incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease and cytomegalovirus reactivation. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00105001).

Risk factors for thrombotic microangiopathy in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell recipients receiving GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus plus MTX or sirolimus

Transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a feared complication of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) owing to its high mortality rate. The use of calcineurin inhibitors or sirolimus (SIR) for GVHD prophylaxis has been suggested as a potential risk factor. However, the impact of tacrolimus (TAC) and SIR combinations on the increased risk of TA-TMA is currently not well defined. We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of TA-TMA in 102 allogeneic HSCT recipients who consecutively received TAC plus SIR (TAC/SIR) (n=68) or plus MTX (TAC/MTX)±ATG (n=34) for GVHD prophylaxis. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of TA-TMA between patients receiving TAC/SIR vs TAC/MTX±ATG (7.4% vs 8.8%, P=0.8). Only grade III-IV acute GVHD, previous HSCT and serum levels of TAC >25 ng/mL were associated with a greater risk of TA-TMA. Patients developing TA-TMA have significantly poorer survival (P<0.001); however, TA-TMA ceased to be an independent prognostic factor when it was included in a multivariate model. In conclusion, the combination of TAC/SIR does not appear to pose a higher risk of TA-TMA. By contrast, we identified three different risk groups for developing TA-TMA.