Hormonal responses to long-term converting enzyme inhibition in hypertensive patients

Plasma renin and the antihypertensive effect of the orally active renin inhibitor aliskiren in clinical hypertension

BACKGROUND

Aliskiren is the first in a new class of orally effective renin inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension.

METHODS

In 569 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, blood pressure (BP), plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma renin concentration (PRC) were measured before and after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with once-daily oral doses of aliskiren (150, 300 or 600 mg), irbesartan 150 mg or placebo.

RESULTS

Aliskiren 150, 300 and 600 mg and irbesartan 150 mg significantly reduced mean cuff sitting systolic BP (SBP) from baseline (p < 0.001 vs. placebo). Aliskiren 150, 300 and 600 mg significantly reduced geometric mean PRA by 69%, 71% and 75% from baseline respectively (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Irbesartan 150 mg significantly increased PRA by 109% (p < 0.05 vs. placebo). Aliskiren dose-dependently increased PRC from baseline by 157%, 246% and 497%, at 150, 300 and 600 mg respectively, compared with a 9% decrease with placebo (p < 0.05). PRC increased significantly more with aliskiren 300 and 600 mg compared with irbesartan 150 mg (105%; p < 0.05). Regression analysis showed no significant correlations between baseline PRA and changes in SBP in any of the treatment groups, but interestingly, the slopes of the regression lines between changes in SBP and log-transformed baseline PRA were +2.0 for placebo and -1.5, -1.8 and -2.3 for aliskiren 150, 300 and 600 mg respectively. The slope for irbesartan 150 mg (-1.4) was similar to that for aliskiren 150 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

Aliskiren reduces SBP and PRA and increases PRC dose-dependently. In contrast, irbesartan reduces SBP but increases both PRC and PRA. As PRA is a measurement of angiotensin I-generating capacity, PRA can be used for measuring the ability of an antihypertensive agent to prevent the generation or action of Ang II, either directly (renin inhibitors, beta-blockers, central alpha(2)-agonists) or indirectly (AT(1)-receptor blockers, ACE inhibitors).

Effect of combining an ACE inhibitor and an angiotensin II receptor blocker on plasma and kidney tissue angiotensin II levels

Increased angiotensin II (AII) activity has been recognized as a risk factor for progression of kidney disease. There is increasing clinical evidence that combining an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor with an AII receptor blocker (ARB) reduces proteinuria and blood pressure in patients with renal disease, although the mechanism of this synergistic effect remains poorly defined. This study tested whether the combination of an ACE inhibitor and an ARB reduces plasma AII (AIIp) and kidney tissue AII (AIIk) beyond what is observed with either of these two agents alone. Mean arterial pressure, glomerular filtration rate, AIIp, and AIIk were measured in four groups of Wistar rats after 2 weeks of a low-salt diet and 1 week of treatment with captopril (2.4 mg/d), losartan (1.7 mg/d), combination captopril+losartan (1.7 mg/d of captopril, 0.7 mg/d of losartan), or no treatment (control). Administration of captopril, losartan, and captopril+losartan produced statistically significant reductions in mean arterial pressure (control, 130 +/- 4 mm Hg; captopril, 92 +/- 5 mm Hg; losartan, 88 +/- 4 mm Hg; captopril+losartan, 104 +/- 5 mm Hg) and mild reductions in glomerular filtration rate (control, 3.1 +/- 0.1 mL/min; captopril, 2.2 +/- 0.3 mL/min; losartan, 1.7 +/- 0.3 mL/min; captopril+losartan, 2.3 +/- 0.3 mL/min) when compared with control rats, but no significant differences were observed among the treated groups. Captopril and captopril +losartan reduced AIIp significantly when compared with control (captopril, 43 +/- 8 pg/mL; captopril+losartan, 47 +/- 5 pg/mL; control, 134 pg/mL) and with losartan (99 +/- 2 pg/mL). AIIk values were reduced in captopril (254 +/- 18 pg/g kidney weight) and losartan (292 +/- 33 pg/g kidney weight) when compared with control (1,235 +/- 79 pg/g kidney weight). Captopril+losartan (136 +/- 17 pg/g kidney weight) reduced AIIk to values significantly lower than captopril or losartan alone. Higher doses of captopril (5 mg/d and 7.5 mg/d) or losartan (4 mg/d and 6 mg/d) alone did not reduce AIIk to the levels observed with combination low doses of captopril+losartan. Combining low doses of ACE inhibitor plus ARB reduces AIIk more than higher doses of either agent alone. This reduction in AIIk with ACE inhibitor plus ARB provides a mechanism to understand the synergism of this combination in reducing proteinuria and blood pressure. The reduction in AIIk with ACE inhibitor plus ARB may have important implications in long-term organ protection in hypertension and renal disease.

Effect of indomethacin on blood pressure control during treatment with nitrendipine

This study tested the hypothesis that treatment with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug will not alter the hypotensive effect of a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist. Fifteen essential hypertensives (ages 58-80 years) had a supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 100 mmHg after 4 weeks monotherapy with nitrendipine 5-20 mg twice daily. They entered a double-blind randomised crossover study in which the addition of indomethacin 25 mg three times daily was compared with placebo in treatment phases each of 4 weeks duration. Subjects were seen weekly and measurements in the last 2 weeks of each phase were compared. Supine blood pressure (mean +/- SE) was higher in the indomethacin phase (158 +/- 4/80 +/- 2) than in the placebo phase (154 +/- 4/76 +/- 3) (p < 0.01 for DBP). In 6/15 (40%) of subjects the increase in supine diastolic blood pressure with indomethacin was > 5 mmHg. Plasma urea was also increased in the indomethacin phase: 7.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l compared with placebo: 6.3 +/- 0.5 mmol/l (p < 0.001). The study has demonstrated that concurrent treatment with the NSAID indomethacin impairs the blood pressure lowering effect of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist nitrendipine. This increase in blood pressure with indomethacin in subjects treated with nitrendipine may represent either an independent pressor effect of indomethacin or a reduced vasodilator prostanoid contribution to the hypotensive effect of nitrendipine. This blood pressure increase may be sufficient to interfere significantly with clinical blood pressure control in some subjects.

The effect of tenidap on the anti-hypertensive efficacy of ACE inhibitors in patients treated for mild to moderate hypertension

1. A randomised, placebo controlled, double-blind, parallel group study was conducted to assess the effect of tenidap sodium, a novel cytokine modulating drug, on the stable hypotensive response to the angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril in subjects with mild to moderate, uncomplicated, essential hypertension. 2. Twenty-four male and female hypertensives, aged 33-77 years, received either 120 mg tenidap sodium or matched placebo daily for 22 days concomitantly with enalapril. 3. Mean endpoint supine and standing, systolic and diastolic pressures remained within 10% of baseline in each treatment group. However, the endpoint values were marginally above baseline during double-blind treatment with tenidap and marginally below baseline in the group receiving placebo. The increases in supine and standing systolic pressures in the tenidap group differed significantly from the changes in the placebo group. There were no significant differences between groups in changes in pulse rate. 4. Gastrointestinal side effects of mild to moderate severity attributed to treatment with tenidap were experienced by five subjects, one of whom was withdrawn during the third week of treatment. One subject receiving placebo was withdrawn because of a moderate headache attributed to study treatment. 5. The results of this study suggest that treatment with tenidap may interfere with the anti-hypertensive efficacy of ACE inhibitors. It is recommended that blood pressure should be monitored when tenidap is administered concomitantly with an ACE inhibitor.

Response of plasma renin-angiotensin system to a single captopril administration in patients receiving long-term treatment with captopril

1. The responses of angiotensin II (AII), AIII, aldosterone and plasma renin activity (PRA) to a single dose of captopril were investigated in hypertensive patients receiving long-term (more than 1 year) captopril therapy (CT patients) and compared with those of non-treated hypertensive patients (NT patients). 2. Baseline levels of AII and aldosterone were significantly lower in CT patients than in NT patients. AIII tended to be lower and PRA was slightly higher in CT than in NT patients, but these differences were not significant. 3. A single administration of captopril (50 mg orally) significantly decreased plasma levels of AII, AIII and aldosterone as well as blood pressure in both CT and NT patients. 4. These results demonstrate that chronically repeated administration of captopril to hypertensive patients effectively reduces the daily blood pressure and concomitantly the plasma AII level to acceptable levels in patients with no experience of ACE inhibition.

Hypertension in the elderly with a special focus on treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium antagonists

Age-related changes (e.g., decrease in plasma renin activity and total body potassium, increase in plasma catecholamines, volume depletion) need to be taken into account when selecting an antihypertensive agent for the elderly patient. A number of large scale clinical trials (e.g., Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program, Veterans Administration Cooperative Study, European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly) have demonstrated that antihypertensive therapy with diuretics substantially reduced cardiovascular mortality and stroke incidence. However, since diuretics, even potassium-sparing agents, may induce hypokalemia, newer antihypertensive agents (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors and calcium antagonists) may also be appropriate as first-line monotherapy for this patient population. ACE inhibitors are effective antihypertensive agents and are associated with a lower rate of adverse effects than diuretics, beta blockers, and centrally acting agents. Nevertheless, periodic monitoring of serum potassium, creatinine levels, and renal function is advisable. An important feature of calcium antagonists is that they lower blood pressure with no negative effect on serum lipids or glucose metabolism. Typically, they have few side effects, peripheral edema being the most commonly reported. A recent double-blind randomized study comparing a new sustained release nifedipine formulation and the ACE inhibitor lisinopril found the 2 drugs equivalent in efficacy with no differences in the rate of adverse events.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: mechanistic controversies

Many studies have investigated the mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Initially, the hemodynamic changes that occur with these agents were attributed solely to the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in plasma. Further research suggested other mechanisms were operable as a relationship was not always evident between hemodynamic changes and inhibition of the plasma renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. A relationship between the pharmacodynamics of these agents and the inhibition of vascular and tissue renin-angiotensin systems, however, has been observed. Mechanisms less likely to contribute to the actions of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are increases in bradykinin and prostaglandin concentrations, or inhibition in the renin-angiotensin system within the central nervous system. Ancillary cardiovascular effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors offer possible new therapeutic gains. An understanding of these mechanistic controversies and newly-defined cardiovascular actions of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are important to clinicians using these agents.

Involvement of the kallikrein-kinin system in the antihypertensive effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

1. Studies were performed in normal subjects and in rats to assess the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition on the kallikrein-kinin system. As ACE is identical to kininase II, one of the enzymes physiologically involved in bradykinin degradation, bradykinin may be expected to accumulate during ACE inhibition. 2. A competitive antagonist of bradykinin was used to explore in unanaesthetized rats the contribution of circulating bradykinin to blood pressure control under ACE inhibition. 3. No evidence was found for a role of this vasodilating peptide in the blood pressure lowering effect of acute ACE inhibition. 4. The plasma activity of carboxypeptidase N (= kininase I), another pathway of bradykinin degradation, remained intact during a 1 week course of treatment with an ACE inhibitor in normal subjects. This therefore indicates that bradykinin formed during ACE inhibition can still be metabolized.

Interactions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

As NSAIDs are commonly used in patients receiving concomitant drug therapy, there is a risk of clinically significant drug interactions. Important interactions with NSAIDs involve one or both of two major mechanisms: pharmacokinetic (e.g. lithium, phenytoin and barbiturates) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. antihypertensive agents, diuretics). Prescription of a NSAID should be preceded by a careful evaluation of any coexisting pathology (such as renal dysfunction or hypertension) or concurrent drug therapy (such as anticonvulsant or anticoagulant agents) which may predispose a patient to the development of an interaction with potentially severe effects.

Effect of chronic inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme on baroreceptor reflex in essential hypertension

We examined baroreflex function and plasma angiotensin II (Ang II) before and after the treatment with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) in eight inpatients with essential hypertension (EHT). Baroreflex sensitivity (BS), expressed as a slope of linear relationship between %-changes in mean blood pressure (BP) and those in plasma concentration of norepinephrine (pNE), was greater during BP reduction by sodium nitroprusside (SNP) than during BP elevation by phenylephrine (PE). Enalapril treatment for 7 days reduced BP without a significant change in heart rate and pNE. It also increased the BS in two cases during SNP infusion and in four cases during PE infusion. Ang II was not significantly reduced after enalapril, while plasma ACE activity was suppressed by about 80% and plasma renin activity (PRA) was elevated. The changes in BS did not correlate with the changes in Ang II. The shift of barofunction curve with an enhancement of BS by enalapril therapy might not be attributed solely to the interaction between circulating Ang II and central baroreflex mechanisms.

Antihypertensive effect of enalapril in essential hypertension: role of prostacyclin

The effects of enalapril alone and in combination with the cyclooxygenase inhibitors sulindac and indomethacin on blood pressure (BP), plasma aldosterone, renin activity and converting enzyme activity were evaluated in 29 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, 26 of whom had low plasma renin activity. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. All patients underwent a 4-week placebo phase (phase I), then received enalapril (20 mg BID) for 4 weeks (phase II). In phase III, group I (n = 10) continued on enalapril alone; group II (n = 9) received sulindac 200 mg BID plus enalapril, and group III (n = 10) received indomethacin 50 mg BID plus enalapril, all for 4 weeks. Enalapril lowered BP significantly (mean supine BP 149/100 in phase I vs. 134/90 in phase II, p less than 0.05) without inhibiting aldosterone production. The BP effect was not blunted by concomitant administration of sulindac or indomethacin. Enalapril lowered converting enzyme activity to 25% to 30% of baseline and tended to increase renin activity. In the 10 patients who received indomethacin (group III), the effects of enalapril alone and enalapril plus indomethacin on urinary excretion of 6-keto prostaglandin F1 alpha (PGF1 alpha), a stable metabolite of prostacyclin (PGI2), were examined. Enalapril increased urinary 6-keto PGF1 alpha in group III from 118 +/- 23 to 194 +/- 38 ng/g creatinine (p less than 0.05), while addition of indomethacin reduced 6-keto PGF1 alpha to basal levels (138 +/- 26 ng/g creatinine).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effect of captopril on cutaneous blood flow in patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon

Fifteen patients with primary Raynaud's phenomenon received captopril 25 mg or placebo, three times daily for 6 weeks, in a randomized double-blind cross-over study. Compared with placebo, captopril produced a significant improvement in cutaneous blood flow but did not alter the frequency or severity of attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon.

Enalapril: a long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor

The development of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors is of landmark importance in the understanding and treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly hypertension and congestive heart failure. Enalapril has recently joined captopril as an approved, orally active ACE inhibitor. Like captopril, it has been effective in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure, with minimal adverse reactions noted. Differences in pharmacology exist between enalapril and captopril which may prove to be of clinical significance.

Increase in vasoactive intestinal polypeptides (VIP) by the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril in congestive heart failure. Relation to haemodynamic and hormonal changes

1. The effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor lisinopril on plasma vasoactive intestinal polypeptides (VIP) and plasma noradrenaline, adrenaline and dopamine were studied in 12 patients with congestive heart failure over two consecutive 48-hr periods. The first day in each period served as a treatment day and the second as a control day. 2. A parallel monitoring was made of various hormonal parameters related to the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and a right-heart catheter was used to monitor haemodynamics at rest. 3. Potent inhibition of the renin-system (as demonstrated by decreases in angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) activity, angiotensin II and plasma aldosterone) together with improved haemodynamics (decreases in mean right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and mean systemic arterial pressure) were recorded. 4. Plasma VIP was significantly increased by a mean of 20.3% (P less than 0.01) on the lisinopril treatment days compared with the control days, whereas circulating catecholamines showed no significant pattern of change. 5. It is postulated that the potent vasodilatory neuromodulator VIP is implicated in the ACE inhibitor effects. 6. The ACE is a non-specific peptidase that previously has been implicated in the potentiation of other vasoactive endogenous systems (kinins and enkephalins).

Urinary excretion of prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 metabolites after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in hypertensive patients

The contribution, if any, of various prostaglandins to the antihypertensive effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) is controversial. We studied the effect of the ACEI captopril (CAP) on the urinary excretion of 6-keto-PGF2 alpha (6-KF), the major metabolite of the vasodilatory prostaglandin, prostacyclin, and thromboxane B2 (TxB2), the stable metabolite of the vasoconstrictor TxA2, in 8 patients with essential hypertension after placebo, two weeks of CAP 25 mg t.i.d. alone, and the same dose of CAP in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 50 mg/day. Mean 6-KF and TxB2 (nmol/8 hr post-dosing, respectively) did not differ significantly with any treatment; the mean ratio of 6-KF/TxB2 was also unchanged. Likewise, the excretion of these prostaglandins was also evaluated after placebo, the ACEI enalapril (ENA) (5 or 10 mg/day), and the combination of ENA and HCTZ in another group of 8 patients with essential hypertension. Mean 6-KF and TxB2 (nmol/24 hr post-dosing, respectively) showed no significant treatment-related differences; the mean ratio was again unchanged. No correlation existed between the magnitude of blood pressure responses with any treatment and either 6-KF or TxB2 excretion. Thus, the antihypertensive action of ACEI, alone or in combination with HCTZ, does not appear to involve alterations in these vasoactive prostaglandins.