Impact of Safety-Related Regulatory Action on Drug Use in Ambulatory Care in the Netherlands

How do safety warnings on medicines affect prescribing?

INTRODUCTION

Many adverse effects of medicines only become known after approval, prompting regulatory agencies to issue post-market safety advisories to inform clinicians and support safer care. Our team evaluated advisories issued by national regulators in Australia, Canada, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and the United States from 2007 to 2016 inclusive, comparing regulators' decisions to warn, effects on prescribing, doctors' awareness and responses to warnings, relevant regulatory policies, and specific case studies.

AREAS COVERED

Based mainly on our research program and a narrative review, this commentary describes how often regulators issue safety advisories and effects on clinical practice. We found extensive differences in decisions to warn, timing and content of warnings. Monitoring advice is often inadequate. The most systematic estimate suggests an average reduction in prescribing of around 6% compared with settings with no advisory. Interviews with doctors suggest limited awareness, uptake, and at times belief in these warnings.

EXPERT OPINION

Post-market safety advisories are an important intervention aiming to improve prescribing and use of medicines. However, differing warnings mean that some patients may be exposed to riskier prescribing than others. Better integration of new safety information into clinical practice is needed, as well as improved transparency, independence, and public engagement in regulatory decision-making.

[Effect of the direct healthcare professional communication on citalopram and escitalopram drug utilization for inpatient treatment of anxiety disorders]

BACKGROUND

In 2011, direct healthcare professional communication (DHPC) letters on citalopram and escitalopram were sent out to address the risk of QTc prolongation in the ECG. Healthcare professionals were informed about a reduction of the maximum recommended daily dose. Furthermore, a contraindication for QTc-prolonging co-medication was given. Previous studies noted that these instructions were implemented incompletely.

AIM

For the first time, this study analyzed how the DHPC affected the prescription of citalopram and escitalopram in patients with anxiety disorders.

METHODS

Drug utilization data from the project "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie e. V." (AMSP) was used to examine whether the proportion of patients treated with a higher-than-recommended daily dose ("high dose") and the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication would decrease post-DHPC (combined category of citalopram/escitalopram).

RESULTS

Drug utilization data of n = 364 patients pre- and n = 262 patients post-DHPC were compared. The proportion of patients with high dose declined from 10.7% to 5.4% (p = 0.019). The proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication did not change significantly from pre- (54.7%) to post-DHPC (51.5%, p = 0.437).

DISCUSSION

In accordance with previous studies, the proportion of high-dose patients decreased after DHPC publication while the proportion of patients with QTc-prolonging co-medication remained widely unchanged. The specific recommendation on daily dosage seems to have been better implemented than the broadly formulated contraindication of QTc-prolonging co-medication. Hence, DHPCs should be written precisely and give advice for specific clinical situations.

Factors Influencing Preferences and Responses Towards Drug Safety Communications: A Conjoint Experiment Among Hospital-Based Healthcare Professionals in the Netherlands

Introduction

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Supplementary Information

Handling of New Drug Safety Information in the Dutch Hospital Setting: A Mixed Methods Approach

INTRODUCTION

The implementation of new drug safety information and Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) in hospitals is important for patient safety.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to gain insight into which procedures and practices are in place to handle new drug safety information and particularly DHPCs in the Dutch hospital setting.

METHODS

We first conducted focus groups including medical specialists and hospital pharmacists, focusing on handling of drug safety information at the individual and organisational level. A survey was then developed and distributed among hospital pharmacists in all Dutch hospitals to quantify the existence of specific procedures and committees to handle drug safety information and DHPCs.

RESULTS

Eleven specialists and 14 pharmacists from six hospitals participated in focus groups. Drug safety information was usually considered before drugs were included in formularies or treatment protocols. Furthermore, drug safety information was consulted in response to patients experiencing adverse events. DHPCs were mostly dealt with by individual professionals. DHPCs could lead to actions but this was very uncommon. Completed surveys were received from 40 (53%) of the hospitals. In 32 (80%), the hospital pharmacy had procedures to deal with new drug safety information, whereas in 11 (28%) a hospital-wide procedure was in place. Drug safety was considered in committees concerning drug formulary decisions (69%) and antibiotic policies (63%). DHPCs were assessed by a hospital pharmacist in 50% of the hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug safety information was used for evaluation of new treatments and in response to adverse events. Assessment of whether a DHPC requires action was primarily an individual task.

Does price deregulation increase drug price in China? An interrupted time series analysis

BACKGROUND

The Chinese government removed the price ceiling of most drugs in June 2015 to establish a market-driven pricing system. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the elimination of drug ceiling price (EDCP) policy on drug prices.

METHODS

Using a national macro-level dataset, we employed an interrupted time series method to study the abrupt level and gradual trend changes of Chinese and Western medicine consumer price index (CPI) between June 2014 and June 2017.

RESULTS

The policy exerted level change on Chinese medicine CPI, increasing 0.201% (95% CI 0.026% to 0.376%, p = 0.026). And the trend in Chinese medicine CPI was still decreased nonsignificantly after the EDCP policy. However, there was no significant price change in Western medicine.

CONCLUSION

The EDCP policy has different effects on the prices of Chinese and Western medicines. Therefore, we need to pay more attention to the drug pricing mechanism in the future.

Are monitoring instructions provided in direct healthcare professional communications (DHPCs) of sufficient quality? A retrospective analysis of DHPCs sent out between 2007 and 2018

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether direct to healthcare professional communications (DHPCs) are of sufficient quality to be applicable in clinical practice and study how the quality differs according to safety concerns and type of monitoring.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

DHPCs containing monitoring instructions were identified among all DHPC issued in Denmark between 2007 and 2018.

INTERVENTION

Quality of information of monitoring instructions was assessed according to the Systematic Information for Monitoring (SIM) score. Associations between different characteristics of instructions and the SIM score were compared with analysis of variance and the post hoc test Tukey's honestly significant difference if significant.

RESULTS

In total, 297 DHPCs were issued, of which 97 contained 134 monitoring instructions. For 95% of these DHPCs the European Medicines Agency was involved. The average SIM score was 2.6±1.6 (ranging 0-6) and only 47% were considered of sufficient quality (SIM score ≥3). In addition, even fewer (11%) instructions were considered a 'adequate instruction' which also reported about facts and risks. Differences between quality of information according to type of monitoring were observed, specifically between clinical monitoring (average SIM score 1.9) and biomarker monitoring (physical average SIM score 2.9, p=0.029 and laboratory average SIM score 3.4, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring instructions were found not to be of sufficient quality to be applicable in clinical practice according to the SIM score. Our study concludes the need for further research and regulatory steps to ensure improve quality of information in safety communications.

Drug utilization patterns of flupirtine following implementation of risk minimization measures in Germany

Objectives: This report characterizes flupirtine prescribing patterns before and after the implementation of risk minimization measures (RMM) in Germany as a complementary analysis to support previous study findings. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using a patient-level longitudinal prescription database (IMS LRx) in Germany. The study population included patients who were prescribed flupirtine-containing products. One-year periods before (2012) and after (April 2015-March 2016) RMM implementation were assessed for the following measures: flupirtine use of up to two weeks, flupirtine use when other analgesics are contraindicated and concomitant use of drugs with a known potential to induce liver injury. Results: The number of flupirtine users decreased by 41.0% from 248,738 patients in the pre-RMM implementation period to 146,764 in the post-implementation period. The proportion of patients prescribed flupirtine for up to 14 days increased significantly by 22.7%, from 67.9% to 90.6% in the pre- to post-implementation periods, respectively. Over half the patients received long-term medications for conditions contraindicated with the use of other analgesics within 12 months prior to the first flupirtine prescription in the pre- and post-implementation periods (57.1% and 52.3%, respectively). Concomitant prescriptions of drugs with known potential hepatotoxic effects were recorded in 36.6% and 34.2% of flupirtine prescriptions during the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. Conclusions: While physicians generally restricted flupirtine prescriptions to the short-term treatment duration recommended in the labeling, the other labeling recommendations were not as stringently adopted. Findings of this investigation support a previous study conducted in an electronic medical record database.

Evaluating the impact of regulatory action on denosumab-induced hypocalcaemia in Japan

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Since its introduction in April 2012, denosumab has been administered to approximately 7,300 patients as of August 2012, and 32 cases of serious hypocalcaemia after denosumab administration, including two deaths, have been reported in Japan. A Dear Healthcare Professional Letter of Rapid Safety Communication ('Blue letter') was released to warn about the risks of hypocalcaemia associated with denosumab. The goal of this study therefore was to measure the impact of regulatory action on denosumab-induced hypocalcaemia in Japan by using an electronic medical information database (MID).

METHODS

We used two different aggregated data sets based on MIDs (data sets one and two). The patients studied were those who were newly prescribed denosumab or zoledronic acid between April 2012 and September 2014. We assessed four indicators: (a) the proportion of patients with calcium supplementation at the initial denosumab treatment, (b) the proportion of patients who underwent a serum calcium test, (c) the average number of serum calcium tests performed and (d) the prevalence of hypocalcaemia. All indices were aggregated by every 3 months. To evaluate the impact of regulatory action, we used difference in difference (DID) analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The proportion of patients with calcium supplementation at the initial denosumab treatment increased year by year in both data sets. The average number of serum calcium tests increased year by year in data set two. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of hypocalcaemia in data set two. This suggests that the estimate of impact of the regulatory action may vary according to the database. In DID analysis, however, significant influences of the regulatory action on combination use with a calcium supplement were detected in both data sets.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

There was a significant influence on combination use of denosumab with vitamin D and/or calcium supplement in both data sets. That there was no apparent increase in the prevalence of denosumab-induced hypocalcaemia, suggests that the regulatory action had an impact in the clinical setting studied. Such regulatory actions may play an important role in the promotion of drug safety.

The impact of risk minimization measures on compliance and prescribing practices of flupirtine in Germany

Objective: In response to safety concerns, risk minimization measures (RMM) for flupirtine were implemented in Europe in 2013 to reduce hepatotoxicity risk. This study aims to characterize compliance and prescribing practices of flupirtine before and after RMM implementation.Research design and methods: A retrospective pre-post design cohort study was conducted in the outpatient setting using a longitudinal electronic medical record database in Germany. The study population included patients who initiated flupirtine. One-year pre- and post-implementation periods were assessed.Main outcome measures: Six RMM elements were evaluated, including indication of acute pain, use for maximum of 2 weeks, use when other analgesics are contraindicated, no pre-existing liver disease or alcohol abuse, no concomitant drug induced liver injury, and weekly liver function tests.Results: The number of flupirtine users decreased by 34.4% from 18,291 in the pre-implementation period (2012) to 12,000 in the post-implementation period (April 2015 to March 2016). Elements of RMM with substantial improvement included flupirtine prescription duration, where the proportion of patients with duration ≤14 days increased significantly by 16.5% from 74.8% to 91.3% in the pre- and post-implementation periods, respectively. RMM with a moderate-to-high degree of compliance during the post-implementation period, although with a very small or no change from the pre- implementation period, included restriction of flupirtine prescribing to patients with acute pain when other analgesics are contraindicated, and avoiding use in patients with either pre-existing liver disease or concomitant drugs known to have a potential hepatotoxic effect. Weekly liver function tests had a low degree of compliance.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that, while physicians restricted flupirtine prescriptions to short-term use in the target population of acute pain, not all drug labeling elements were followed to the same extent in routine practice.

Safety Communication Tools and Healthcare Professionals' Awareness of Specific Drug Safety Issues in Europe: A Survey Study

Introduction

National competent authorities (NCAs) use Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) to communicate new drug safety issues to healthcare professionals (HCPs). More knowledge is needed about the effectiveness of DHPCs and the extent to which they raise awareness of new safety issues among HCPs.

Objective

The objective was to assess and compare general practitioners’ (GPs’), cardiologists’, and pharmacists’ familiarity with DHPCs as communication tools, their awareness of specific drug safety issues, and the sources through which they had become aware of the specific issues.

Methods

GPs, cardiologists, and pharmacists from nine European countries (Croatia, Denmark, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the UK) completed a web-based survey. The survey was conducted in the context of the Strengthening Collaboration for Operating Pharmacovigilance in Europe (SCOPE) Joint Action. Respondents were asked about their familiarity with DHPCs in general and their awareness of safety issues that had recently been communicated and involved the following drugs: combined hormonal contraceptives, diclofenac, valproate, and ivabradine. Those HCPs who were aware of the specific safety issues were subsequently asked to indicate the source through which they had become aware of them. Differences between professions in familiarity with DHPCs and awareness were tested using a Pearson χ² test per country and post hoc Pearson χ² tests in the case of statistically significant differences.

Results

Of the 3288 included respondents, 54% were GPs, 40% were pharmacists, and 7% were cardiologists. The number of respondents ranged from 67 in Denmark to 916 in Spain. Most respondents (92%) were familiar with DHPCs, with one significant difference between the professions: pharmacists were more familiar than GPs in Italy (99 vs 90%, P = 0.004). GPs’ awareness ranged from 96% for the diclofenac issue to 70% for the ivabradine issue. A similar pattern was shown for pharmacists (91% aware of the diclofenac issue to 66% of the ivabradine issue). Cardiologists’ awareness ranged from 91% for the ivabradine issue to 34% for the valproate issue. Overall, DHPCs were a common source through which GPs (range: 45% of those aware of the contraceptives issue to 60% of those aware of the valproate issue), cardiologists (range: 33% for the contraceptives issue to 61% for the valproate issue), and pharmacists (range: 41% for the contraceptives issue to 51% for the ivabradine issue) had become aware of the specific safety issues, followed by information on websites or in newsletters.

Conclusions

GPs, cardiologists, and pharmacists were to a similar extent (highly) familiar with DHPCs, but they differed in awareness levels of specific safety issues. Cardiologists were less aware of safety issues associated with non-cardiology drugs even if these had cardiovascular safety concerns. This implies that additional strategies may be needed to reach specialists when communicating safety issues regarding drugs outside their therapeutic area but with risks related to their field of specialisation. DHPCs were an important source for the different professions to become aware of specific safety issues, but other sources were also often used. NCAs should consider the use of a range of sources when communicating important safety issues to HCPs.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40264-018-0643-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparative, cross-sectional study of the format, content and timing of medication safety letters issued in Canada, the USA and the UK

OBJECTIVES

To assess consistency in the format and content, and overlap of subject and timing, of medication safety letters issued by regulatory health authorities to healthcare providers in Canada, the USA and the UK.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study comparing medication safety letters issued for the purpose of alerting healthcare providers to newly identified medication problems associated with medications already on the market.

SETTING

Online databases operated by Health Canada, the US Food and Drug Administration and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency were searched to select medication safety letters issued between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2014. Format, content and timing of each medication safety letter were assessed using an abstraction tool comprising 21 characteristics deemed relevant by consensus of the research team.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures included, first, characteristics (format and content) of medication safety letters and second, overlap of subject and release date across countries.

RESULTS

Of 330 medication safety letters identified, 227 dealt with unique issues relating to medications available in all three countries. Of these 227 letters, 21 (9%) medication problems were the subject of letters released in all three countries; 40 (18%) in two countries and 166 (73%) in only one country. Only 13 (62%) of the 21 letters issued in all three countries were released within 6 months of each other.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant discrepancies in both the subject and timing of medication safety letters issued by health authorities in three countries (Canada, the USA and the UK) where medical practice is otherwise comparable, raising questions about why, how and when medication problems are identified and communicated to healthcare providers by the authorities. More rapid communication of medication problems and better alignment between authorities could enhance patient safety.

Factors Influencing the Use of a Mobile App for Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions and Receiving Safety Information: A Qualitative Study

Introduction

A mobile app may increase the reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and improve the communication of new drug safety information. Factors that influence the use of an app for such two-way risk communication need to be considered at the development stage.

Objective

Our aim was to reveal the factors that may influence healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients to use an app for two-way risk communication.

Methods

Focus group discussions and face-to-face interviews were conducted in the Netherlands, Spain and the UK. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, patients with a rare disease or their caregivers and adolescents with health conditions were eligible to participate. HCPs included pharmacists, paediatricians, general practitioners, internists, practice nurses and professionals caring for patients with a rare disease. Patients and HCPs were recruited through various channels. The recorded discussions and interviews were transcribed verbatim. The dataset was analysed using thematic analysis and arranged according to the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.

Results

Seven focus group discussions and 13 interviews were conducted. In total, 21 HCPs and 50 patients participated. Identified factors that may influence the use of the app were the type of feedback given on reported ADRs, how ADR reports are stored and the type of drug news. Also mentioned were other functions of the app, ease of use, type of language, the source of safety information provided through the app, security of the app, layout, the operating systems on which the app can be used and the costs.

Conclusions

Further research is needed to assess associations between user characteristics and the direction (positive or negative) of the factors potentially influencing app use.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40264-016-0494-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Additional Value of an E-Mail to Inform Healthcare Professionals of a Drug Safety Issue: A Randomized Controlled Trial in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The usefulness and the impact of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs, or 'Dear Doctor letters') in changing the clinical behaviour of physicians have been debated. Changes in the current risk communication methods should preferably be based on the preferences of the healthcare professionals, to optimize the uptake of the message.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess whether safety issues are communicated more effectively with an additional e-mail sent by the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (MEB) than with the DHPC only.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted amongst ophthalmologists and hospital pharmacists in the Netherlands, who were the target group of a DHPC that was issued for pegaptanib, a drug that is administered intra-ocularly in patients with macular degeneration. The intervention group (N = 110) received the pegaptanib DHPC, as well as the MEB e-mail. The control group (N = 105) received the traditional paper-based DHPC only. Two weeks later, the study population received an invitation to fill out an online questionnaire. Questions were asked about the respondents' knowledge and attitude regarding the pegaptanib issue, and any action they had consequently taken. Additional questions were asked about their satisfaction with the DHPC and the e-mail, and their preferred source of such information.

RESULTS

Forty respondents (18.6%) completed the questionnaire. Eighty-one percent of the respondents in the intervention group (N = 21) and 47% of the control group (N = 19) correctly indicated that a serious increase in intra-ocular pressure could be caused by pegaptanib injections (Fishers' exact test, p = 0.046). Nine respondents in the intervention group versus none of the control group respondents indicated that they had taken action in response to the pegaptanib safety issue (Fishers' exact test, p = 0.01). The majority of both the intervention group and the control group confirmed that they would like to receive an MEB e-mail with safety information about drugs in the future (90 and 95 %, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that an additional e-mail might strengthen the uptake of the safety information provided to healthcare professionals, who prefer to receive an e-mail from the MEB as a source of such information, as well as the DHPC. This study may serve as a starting point for new strategies to improve risk communication regarding safety issues associated with drugs and its impact on prescribing.

Prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in new users as a result of communications regarding clopidogrel - proton pump inhibitor interaction

Safety concerns of the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were published in 2009 and 2010 by the medicines regulatory agencies, including a direct healthcare professional communication. We examined the association between various safety statements and prescription behavior for gastroprotective drugs in naïve patients in the Netherlands during the years 2008–2011. Data from the PHARMO Database Network were analyzed with interrupted time series analyses to estimate the impact of each communication on drug prescriptions. Dispensings were used as a proxy variable for prescription behavior. After the early communication in January 2009, 15.5% (95% CI 7.8, 23.4) more patients started concomitantly with (es)omeprazole and 13.8% (95% CI 6.5, 21.2) less with other PPIs. Directly after the first statement in June 2009, we found a steep increase in histamine 2‐receptor antagonists (H2RA) peaking at 25%, placing those patients at risk for gastrointestinal events. This effect for H2RA faded away after a few months. In February 2010, when the official advice via an adjusted statement was to avoid (es)omeprazole, we found a decrease of 11.9% (95% CI 5.7, 18.2) for (es)omeprazole and an increase of +16.0% (95% CI 10.3, 21.7) for other PPIs. Still 22.6% (95% CI 19.5, 25.7) of patients started on (es)omeprazole in February 2010, placing them at risk for cardiovascular events. Advices of regulatory authorities were followed, however, reluctantly and not fully, probably partly because of the existing scientific doubt about the interaction.

Assessment of the impact of scheduled postmarketing safety summary analyses on regulatory actions

In addition to standard postmarketing drug safety monitoring, Section 915 of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (FDAAA) requires the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to conduct a summary analysis of adverse event reports to identify risks of a drug or biologic product 18 months after product approval, or after 10,000 patients have used the product, whichever is later. We assessed the extent to which these analyses identified new safety signals and resultant safety-related label changes. Among 458 newly approved products, 300 were the subjects of a scheduled analysis; a new safety signal that resulted in a safety-related label change was found for 11 of these products. Less than 2% of 713 safety-related label changes were based on the scheduled analyses. Our study suggests that the safety summary analyses provide only marginal value over other pharmacovigilance activities.

Are ECG monitoring recommendations before prescription of QT-prolonging drugs applied in daily practice? The example of haloperidol

PURPOSE

Monitoring of the QT duration by electrocardiography (ECG) prior to treatment is frequently recommended in the label of QT-prolonging drugs. It is, however, unknown how often general practitioners in daily clinical practice are adhering to these risk-minimization measures. We assessed the frequency of ECG measurements in patients where haloperidol was initiated in primary care.

METHODS

Patients (≥18 years) with a first prescription of haloperidol in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (2009-2013) were included. The proportion of ECGs made was determined in two blocks of 4 weeks: during the exposure period when haloperidol was initiated, and during the control period, 1 year before. Conditional logistic regression analysis was applied to calculate the relative risk of having an ECG in the exposure period compared with the control period. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the proportion of ECG measurements in patients with one or more additional risk factors for QT prolongation.

RESULTS

In total, 3420 patients were prescribed haloperidol during the exposure period, and 1.8% of them had an ECG at treatment initiation, compared with 0.8% during the control period (relative risk [RR] 2.4 [1.5-3.8]). Of the patients with additional risk factors for QT prolongation, 1.9% of the patients had an ECG at initiation of the prescription, compared with 1.0% during the control period (RR 2.1 [1.2-3.5]).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with recommendations to perform an electrocardiogram when starting a new QT-prolonging drug is extremely low, when haloperidol is taken as an example.

Methodological gaps in the assessment of risk minimization interventions: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Since the introduction of therapeutic risk management regulatory guidance, an increase in the number of risk minimization interventions (RMIs) published in the literature has been observed. Methods used to evaluate their effectiveness remain, however, poorly examined.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to conduct a literature review on the methods of evaluation of effectiveness of RMIs and to identify methodological gaps.

METHODS

The search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2010, and updated on 1 April 2013. The following characteristics were extracted from each study: target population for the RMI, target population for the assessment of effectiveness, study design, data sources, and effectiveness outcome(s).

RESULTS

A total of 188 unique RMIs were identified in the literature, of which effectiveness was evaluated in only 65 (34.6%) at the time of publication. The largest proportion of studies reviewed (n = 49, 75.4%) attempted to evaluate changes in behavior through prescribing or laboratory test practices. One quarter of studies evaluated the effect of RMIs on the occurrence of adverse events. Only a minority of studies used robust designs, such as randomized controlled trials (n = 6, 9.2%) or a quasi-experimental design with a parallel comparison group (n = 8, 12.3%).

CONCLUSION

Lack of robust methodological design used in published studies on RMI effectiveness evaluation is an important methodological gap in the evaluation of RMI effectiveness. © 2014 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The impact of direct healthcare professional communication on prescribing practice in the UK hospital setting: an interrupted time series analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs) aim to quickly disseminate information to key healthcare professionals to inform practice and minimize patient harm. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issues warnings and alerts to communicate safety information effectively in the UK.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of MHRA DHPCs on prescribing practice in the secondary-care setting, looking specifically at a drug-drug interaction-the concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) [as omeprazole]-and a drug-disease contraindication-the use of conventional (typical) antipsychotics in dementia.

METHODS

The effects of the MHRA DHPCs were analysed using segmented binary logistic regression of interrupted time series. This allowed for the detection of any significant changes in prescribing practice occurring after the MHRA warnings were issued, whilst controlling for the baseline period.

RESULTS

Of the patients concomitantly prescribed clopidogrel and omeprazole on admission, the rate at which omeprazole was substituted for either another PPI (with the exception of esomeprazole), or for a histamine H2-antagonist showed a significant step-change increase after the DHPC was issued. The modelled rate increased from 5.1 % in the month directly before the intervention to 25.1 % in the following month (odds ratio [OR] 6.18; p < 0.001). However, the action taken in the switching of therapy was not always consistent with the advice from the current MHRA warning. The rate of typical antipsychotic prescribing in patients with dementia was declining significantly by 3.9 % per quarter prior to the DHPC being issued (OR 0.970; p = 0.035). No significant step-change was detected immediately after the DHPC (p = 0.962). However, the rate of decline increased significantly in the post-warning period to 12.3 % per quarter (OR 0.938; p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that DHPCs issued by the MHRA as warnings are associated with changes in prescribing practices in secondary care. However, their impact is variable depending on the intervention described by the warning. A national initiative to ensure patient safety information is effectively translated into practice and the effect of the warning continues beyond the period of the issue would be beneficial.

The increase in prescriptions of bisphosphonates and the incidence proportion of osteonecrosis of the jaw after risk communication activities in Japan: a hospital-based cohort study

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of risk communication about bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) on the number of reported cases to the Drug Adverse Reactions Reporting System and on the incidence proportion of ONJ in a hospital-based cohort study in Japan.

Method

We conducted a survey of the safety information on BP-related ONJ available from regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers and academic associations. We also performed a trend analysis of a dataset from the Drug Adverse Reactions Reporting System and a sub-analysis, using previously constructed data from a retrospective cohort study.

Results

Risk communication from pharmaceutical manufacturers and academic associations began within 1 year after revisions were made to the package inserts, in October 2006. Twenty times more cases of ONJ have been reported to regulatory authority since 2007, compared with the period before 2007. In our cohort, the incidence proportion of ONJ during and after 2009 was four times greater than before 2009. During this period, BPs were frequently prescribed, whereas there was no increase in the use of alternative agents, such as selective estrogen receptor modulators.

Conclusion

ONJ was increasingly diagnosed after risk communication efforts, but the impact of the communications was not clear. Safety notifications were diligently disseminated after the package insert was revised. However, there was no surveillance for ONJ before the revision. © 2014 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The cost-effectiveness of periodic safety update reports for biologicals in Europe

We analyzed the cost-effectiveness of all Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs) submitted for biologicals in Europe from 1995 to 2009 by comparing two regulatory scenarios: full regulation (PSUR reporting) and limited regulation (no PSUR reporting, but all other parts of the pharmacovigilance framework remain in place). During this period, PSUR reporting resulted in the detection of 2 out of a total of 24 urgent safety issues for biologicals: (i) distant spread of botulinum toxin and (ii) edema/fluid collection associated with off-label use of dibotermin-alfa. We used Markov-chain life tables to calculate costs and health effects of PSURs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of full regulation (PSUR reporting) vs. limited regulation (no PSUR reporting) for the base-case scenario was \[euro]342,110 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. It is possible to assess the cost-effectiveness of regulatory requirements using the same methods as those used in assessing the cost-effectiveness of medical interventions.

When direct health-care professional communications have an impact on inappropriate and unsafe use of medicines

Serious safety issues relating to drugs are communicated to health-care professionals via Direct Health-Care Professional Communications (DHPCs). We explored which characteristics determined the impact of DHPCs issued in the Netherlands for ambulatory-care drugs (2001-2008). With multiple linear regression, we examined the impact on the relative change in new drug use post-DHPC of the following: time to DHPC, trend in use, degree of innovation, specialist drug, first/repeated DHPC, DHPC template, and type of safety issue. DHPCs have less impact on use of specialist drugs than nonspecialist drugs (P < 0.05). The DHPCs' impact increased after availability of a template emphasizing the main problem (P < 0.05), and for safety issues with a risk of death and/or disability (both P < 0.05) (adjusted R² = 0.392). Risk communication can be effective, specifically in case of well-structured information, and very serious safety issues. Effectiveness may improve by tailoring DHPCs and adding other communication channels, for example for drugs that are increasingly being used.