1
|
Hamy V, Llop C, Yee CW, Garcia-Gancedo L, Maxwell A, Chen WH, Tomlinson R, Bobbili P, Bendelac J, Landry J, DerSarkissian M, Yenikomshian M, Mody EA, Duh MS, Williams R. Patient-centric assessment of rheumatoid arthritis using a smartwatch and bespoke mobile app in a clinical setting. Sci Rep 2023; 13:18311. [PMID: 37880288 PMCID: PMC10600111 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45387-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a fluctuating progressive disease requiring frequent symptom assessment for appropriate management. Continuous tracking using digital technologies may provide greater insights of a patient's experience. This prospective study assessed the feasibility, reliability, and clinical utility of using novel digital technologies to remotely monitor participants with RA. Participants with moderate to severe RA and non-RA controls were monitored continuously for 14 days using an iPhone with an integrated bespoke application and an Apple Watch. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures and objective guided tests designed to assess disease-related impact on physical function. The study was completed by 28 participants with RA, 28 matched controls, and 2 unmatched controls. Completion rates for all assessments were > 97% and were reproducible over time. Several guided tests distinguished between RA and control cohorts (e.g., mean lie-to-stand time [seconds]: RA: 4.77, control: 3.25; P < 0.001). Participants with RA reporting greater stiffness, pain, and fatigue had worse guided test performances (e.g., wrist movement [P < 0.001] and sit-to-stand transition time [P = 0.009]) compared with those reporting lower stiffness, pain, and fatigue. This study demonstrates that digital technologies can be used in a well-controlled, remote clinical setting to assess the daily impact of RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Hamy
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Brentford, TW8 9GS, UK.
| | | | | | | | - Aoife Maxwell
- Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK, Brentford, TW8 9GS, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elinor A Mody
- Rheumatology Department, Reliant Medical Group, Auburn, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Izmailova ES, Maguire RP, McCarthy TJ, Müller MLTM, Murphy P, Stephenson D. Empowering drug development: Leveraging insights from imaging technologies to enable the advancement of digital health technologies. Clin Transl Sci 2023; 16:383-397. [PMID: 36382716 PMCID: PMC10014695 DOI: 10.1111/cts.13461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has publicly recognized the importance of improving drug development efficiency, deeming translational biomarkers a top priority. The use of imaging biomarkers has been associated with increased rates of drug approvals. An appropriate level of validation provides a pragmatic way to choose and implement these biomarkers. Standardizing imaging modality selection, data acquisition protocols, and image analysis (in ways that are agnostic to equipment and algorithms) have been key to imaging biomarker deployment. The best known examples come from studies done via precompetitive collaboration efforts, which enable input from multiple stakeholders and data sharing. Digital health technologies (DHTs) provide an opportunity to measure meaningful aspects of patient health, including patient function, for extended periods of time outside of the hospital walls, with objective, sensor-based measures. We identified the areas where learnings from the imaging biomarker field can accelerate the adoption and widespread use of DHTs to develop novel treatments. As with imaging, technical validation parameters and performance acceptance thresholds need to be established. Approaches amenable to multiple hardware options and data processing algorithms can be enabled by sharing DHT data and by cross-validating algorithms. Data standardization and creation of shared databases will be vital. Pre-competitive consortia (public-private partnerships and professional societies that bring together all stakeholders, including patient organizations, industry, academic experts, and regulators) will advance the regulatory maturity of DHTs in clinical trials.
Collapse
|
3
|
Müller MLTM, Stephenson DT. Leveraging the regulatory framework to facilitate drug development in Parkinson's disease. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2023; 193:347-360. [PMID: 36803822 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-85555-6.00015-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
There is an exigent need for disease-modifying and symptomatic treatment approaches for Parkinson's disease. A better understanding of Parkinson's disease pathophysiology and new insights in genetics has opened exciting new venues for pharmacological treatment targets. There are, however, many challenges on the path from discovery to drug approval. These challenges revolve around appropriate endpoint selection, the lack of accurate biomarkers, challenges with diagnostic accuracy, and other challenges commonly encountered by drug developers. The regulatory health authorities, however, have provided tools to provide guidance for drug development and to assist with these challenges. The main goal of the Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium, a nonprofit public-private partnership part of the Critical Path Institute, is to advance these so-called drug development tools for Parkinson's disease trials. The focus of this chapter will be on how the health regulators' tools were successfully leveraged to facilitate drug development in Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martijn L T M Müller
- Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium - Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States.
| | - Diane T Stephenson
- Critical Path for Parkinson's Consortium - Critical Path Institute, Tucson, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gerhalter T, Müller C, Maron E, Thielen M, Schätzl T, Mähler A, Schütte T, Boschmann M, Herzer R, Spuler S, Gazzerro E. "suMus," a novel digital system for arm movement metrics and muscle energy expenditure. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1057592. [PMID: 36776973 PMCID: PMC9909604 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1057592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: In the field of non-treatable muscular dystrophies, promising new gene and cell therapies are being developed and are entering clinical trials. Objective assessment of therapeutic effects on motor function is mandatory for economical and ethical reasons. Main shortcomings of existing measurements are discontinuous data collection in artificial settings as well as a major focus on walking, neglecting the importance of hand and arm movements for patients' independence. We aimed to create a digital tool to measure muscle function with an emphasis on upper limb motility. Methods: suMus provides a custom-made App running on smartwatches. Movement data are sent to the backend of a suMus web-based platform, from which they can be extracted as CSV data. Fifty patients with neuromuscular diseases assessed the pool of suMus activities in a first orientation phase. suMus performance was hence validated in four upper extremity exercises based on the feedback of the orientation phase. We monitored the arm metrics in a cohort of healthy volunteers using the suMus application, while completing each exercise at low frequency in a metabolic chamber. Collected movement data encompassed average acceleration, rotation rate as well as activity counts. Spearman rank tests correlated movement data with energy expenditure from the metabolic chamber. Results: Our novel application "suMus," sum of muscle activity, collects muscle movement data plus Patient-Related-Outcome-Measures, sends real-time feedback to patients and caregivers and provides, while ensuring data protection, a long-term follow-up of disease course. The application was well received from the patients during the orientation phase. In our pilot study, energy expenditure did not differ between overnight fasted and non-fasted participants. Acceleration ranged from 1.7 ± 0.7 to 3.2 ± 0.5 m/sec2 with rotation rates between 0.9 ± 0.5 and 2.0 ± 3.4 rad/sec. Acceleration and rotation rate as well as derived activity counts correlated with energy expenditure values measured in the metabolic chamber for one exercise (r = 0.58, p < 0.03). Conclusion: In the analysis of slow frequency movements of upper extremities, the integration of the suMus application with smartwatch sensors characterized motion parameters, thus supporting a use in clinical trial outcome measures. Alternative methodologies need to complement indirect calorimetry in validating accelerometer-derived energy expenditure data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Gerhalter
- Muscle Research Unit, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Teresa Schätzl
- Muscle Research Unit, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anja Mähler
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
| | - Till Schütte
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany,Clinical Study Center (CSC), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Boschmann
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Simone Spuler
- Muscle Research Unit, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Simone Spuler, ; Elisabetta Gazzerro,
| | - Elisabetta Gazzerro
- Muscle Research Unit, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint Cooperation between the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association and the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Simone Spuler, ; Elisabetta Gazzerro,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vignali V, Hines PA, Cruz AG, Ziętek B, Herold R. Health horizons: Future trends and technologies from the European Medicines Agency's horizon scanning collaborations. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1064003. [PMID: 36569125 PMCID: PMC9772004 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1064003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In medicines development, the progress in science and technology is accelerating. Awareness of these developments and their associated challenges and opportunities is essential for medicines regulators and others to translate them into benefits for society. In this context, the European Medicines Agency uses horizon scanning to shine a light on early signals of relevant innovation and technological trends with impact on medicinal products. This article provides the results of systematic horizon scanning exercises conducted by the Agency, in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the European Commission's Joint Research Centre's (DG JRC). These collaborative exercises aim to inform policy-makers of new trends and increase preparedness in responding to them. A subset of 25 technological trends, divided into three clusters were selected and reviewed from the perspective of medicines regulators. For each of these trends, the expected impact and challenges for their adoption are discussed, along with recommendations for developers, regulators and policy makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Vignali
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands,Department of Biomedical Engineering, W.J. Kolff Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Philip A. Hines
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands,Faculty of Health Medicines and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Philip A. Hines,
| | | | | | - Ralf Herold
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sun S, Folarin AA, Zhang Y, Cummins N, Liu S, Stewart C, Ranjan Y, Rashid Z, Conde P, Laiou P, Sankesara H, Dalla Costa G, Leocani L, Sørensen PS, Magyari M, Guerrero AI, Zabalza A, Vairavan S, Bailon R, Simblett S, Myin-Germeys I, Rintala A, Wykes T, Narayan VA, Hotopf M, Comi G, Dobson RJ. The utility of wearable devices in assessing ambulatory impairments of people with multiple sclerosis in free-living conditions. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 227:107204. [PMID: 36371974 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system affecting over 2.5 million people globally. In-clinic six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a widely used objective measure to evaluate the progression of MS. Yet, it has limitations such as the need for a clinical visit and a proper walkway. The widespread use of wearable devices capable of depicting patients' activity profiles has the potential to assess the level of MS-induced disability in free-living conditions. METHODS In this work, we extracted 96 features in different temporal granularities (from minute-level to day-level) from wearable data and explored their utility in estimating 6MWT scores in a European (Italy, Spain, and Denmark) MS cohort of 337 participants over an average of 10 months' duration. We combined these features with participants' demographics using three regression models including elastic net, gradient boosted trees and random forest. In addition, we quantified the individual feature's contribution using feature importance in these regression models, linear mixed-effects models, generalized estimating equations, and correlation-based feature selection (CFS). RESULTS The results showed promising estimation performance with R2 of 0.30, which was derived using random forest after CFS. This model was able to distinguish the participants with low disability from those with high disability. Furthermore, we observed that the minute-level (≤ 8 minutes) step count, particularly those capturing the upper end of the step count distribution, had a stronger association with 6MWT. The use of a walking aid was indicative of ambulatory function measured through 6MWT. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the utility of wearables devices in assessing ambulatory impairments in people with MS in free-living conditions and provides a basis for future investigation into the clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaoxiong Sun
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Amos A Folarin
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yuezhou Zhang
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas Cummins
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shuo Liu
- Chair of Embedded Intelligence for Health Care & Wellbeing, University of Augsburg, Germany
| | - Callum Stewart
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Yatharth Ranjan
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Zulqarnain Rashid
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Pauline Conde
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Petroula Laiou
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Heet Sankesara
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Letizia Leocani
- Vita-Salute University and Experimental Neurophysiology Unit, Institute of Experimental Neurology-INSPE, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Per Soelberg Sørensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Isabel Guerrero
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Zabalza
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d'Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Raquel Bailon
- Biomedical Signal Interpretation & Computational Simulation (BSICoS) Group, Aragon Institute of Engineering Research (I3A), IIS Aragon, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain; Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sara Simblett
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Inez Myin-Germeys
- Department of Neurosciences, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Aki Rintala
- Department of Neurosciences, Centre for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Social Services and Health Care, LAB University of Applied Sciences, Lahti, Finland
| | - Til Wykes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Matthew Hotopf
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giancarlo Comi
- Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Casa di Cura Privata del Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Richard Jb Dobson
- The Department of Biostatistics and Health informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Jong AJ, van Rijssel TI, Zuidgeest MGP, van Thiel GJMW, Askin S, Fons-Martínez J, De Smedt T, de Boer A, Santa-Ana-Tellez Y, Gardarsdottir H. Opportunities and Challenges for Decentralized Clinical Trials: European Regulators' Perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:344-352. [PMID: 35488483 PMCID: PMC9540149 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have the potential to improve accessibility, diversity, and retention in clinical trials by moving trial activities to participants’ homes and local surroundings. In this study, we conducted semi‐structured interviews with 20 European regulators to identify regulatory challenges and opportunities for the implementation of DCTs in the European Union. The key opportunities for DCTs that were recognized by regulators include a reduced participation burden, which could facilitate the participation of underserved patients. In addition, regulators indicated that data collected in DCTs are expected to be more representative of the real world. Key challenges recognized by regulators for DCTs include concerns regarding investigator oversight and participants’ safety when physical examinations and face‐to‐face contact are limited. To facilitate future learning, hybrid clinical trials with both on‐site and decentralized elements are proposed by the respondents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amos J de Jong
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa I van Rijssel
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mira G P Zuidgeest
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ghislaine J M W van Thiel
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Scott Askin
- Regulatory Affairs Innovation, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jaime Fons-Martínez
- The Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, Valencia, Spain
| | - Tim De Smedt
- Global Regulatory Affairs, UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anthonius de Boer
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yared Santa-Ana-Tellez
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division Laboratory and Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zaratin P, Vermersch P, Amato MP, Brichetto G, Coetzee T, Cutter G, Edan G, Giovannoni G, Gray E, Hartung HP, Hobart J, Helme A, Hyde R, Khan U, Leocani L, Mantovani LG, McBurney R, Montalban X, Penner IK, Uitdehaag BM, Valentine P, Weiland H, Bertorello D, Battaglia MA, Baneke P, Comi G. The agenda of the global Patient Reported Outcomes for Multiple Sclerosis (PROMS) Initiative: progresses and open questions. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 61:103757. [DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Stephenson D, Ollivier C, Brinton R, Barrett J. Can Innovative Trial Designs in Orphan Diseases Drive Advancement of Treatments for Common Neurological Diseases? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 111:799-806. [PMID: 35034352 PMCID: PMC9305159 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Global regulatory agencies have transformed their approach to approvals in their processes for formal review of the safety and efficacy of new drugs. Opportunities for innovation have expanded because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Several regulatory-led initiatives have progressed rapidly during the past year including patient-focused drug development, model-informed drug development, Real World Evidence, and complex innovative trial designs. Collectively, these initiatives have accelerated the rate of approvals. Despite demands to focus on urgent needs imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of new drug approvals over the past year, particularly for rare diseases, has outpaced expectations. Advancing therapeutics for nervous system disorders requires adaptive strategies that align with rapid developments in the field. Three relentlessly progressive diseases, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD), and Parkinson's disease are in urgent need of new treatments. Herein, we propose new regulatory initiatives including innovative trial designs and patient-focused drug development that accelerate clinical trial conduct while meeting critical regulatory requirements for therapeutic approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Roberta Brinton
- University of Arizona Health Sciences, Center for Innovation in Brain Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Polhemus A, Delgado-Ortiz L, Brittain G, Chynkiamis N, Salis F, Gaßner H, Gross M, Kirk C, Rossanigo R, Taraldsen K, Balta D, Breuls S, Buttery S, Cardenas G, Endress C, Gugenhan J, Keogh A, Kluge F, Koch S, Micó-Amigo ME, Nerz C, Sieber C, Williams P, Bergquist R, Bosch de Basea M, Buckley E, Hansen C, Mikolaizak AS, Schwickert L, Scott K, Stallforth S, van Uem J, Vereijken B, Cereatti A, Demeyer H, Hopkinson N, Maetzler W, Troosters T, Vogiatzis I, Yarnall A, Becker C, Garcia-Aymerich J, Leocani L, Mazzà C, Rochester L, Sharrack B, Frei A, Puhan M. Walking on common ground: a cross-disciplinary scoping review on the clinical utility of digital mobility outcomes. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4:149. [PMID: 34650191 PMCID: PMC8516969 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00513-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Physical mobility is essential to health, and patients often rate it as a high-priority clinical outcome. Digital mobility outcomes (DMOs), such as real-world gait speed or step count, show promise as clinical measures in many medical conditions. However, current research is nascent and fragmented by discipline. This scoping review maps existing evidence on the clinical utility of DMOs, identifying commonalities across traditional disciplinary divides. In November 2019, 11 databases were searched for records investigating the validity and responsiveness of 34 DMOs in four diverse medical conditions (Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hip fracture). Searches yielded 19,672 unique records. After screening, 855 records representing 775 studies were included and charted in systematic maps. Studies frequently investigated gait speed (70.4% of studies), step length (30.7%), cadence (21.4%), and daily step count (20.7%). They studied differences between healthy and pathological gait (36.4%), associations between DMOs and clinical measures (48.8%) or outcomes (4.3%), and responsiveness to interventions (26.8%). Gait speed, step length, cadence, step time and step count exhibited consistent evidence of validity and responsiveness in multiple conditions, although the evidence was inconsistent or lacking for other DMOs. If DMOs are to be adopted as mainstream tools, further work is needed to establish their predictive validity, responsiveness, and ecological validity. Cross-disciplinary efforts to align methodology and validate DMOs may facilitate their adoption into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Polhemus
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Laura Delgado-Ortiz
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gavin Brittain
- Department of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Nikolaos Chynkiamis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Francesca Salis
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Heiko Gaßner
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michaela Gross
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Cameron Kirk
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachele Rossanigo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Kristin Taraldsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Diletta Balta
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Sofie Breuls
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sara Buttery
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gabriela Cardenas
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christoph Endress
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Julia Gugenhan
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Alison Keogh
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Felix Kluge
- Department of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sarah Koch
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Encarna Micó-Amigo
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Corinna Nerz
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Chloé Sieber
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Parris Williams
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ronny Bergquist
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Magda Bosch de Basea
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ellen Buckley
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clint Hansen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Lars Schwickert
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Kirsty Scott
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sabine Stallforth
- Department of Molecular Neurology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Janet van Uem
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Beatrix Vereijken
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Andrea Cereatti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Heleen Demeyer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Walter Maetzler
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Thierry Troosters
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ioannis Vogiatzis
- Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University Newcastle, Newcastle, UK
| | - Alison Yarnall
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Clemens Becker
- Department of Clinical Gerontology, Robert-Bosch-Hospital, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurology, San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Mazzà
- Insigneo Institute, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Lynn Rochester
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Basil Sharrack
- Department of Neuroscience and Sheffield NIHR Translational Neuroscience BRC, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Anja Frei
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Milo Puhan
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stephenson D, Badawy R, Mathur S, Tome M, Rochester L. Digital Progression Biomarkers as Novel Endpoints in Clinical Trials: A Multistakeholder Perspective. JOURNAL OF PARKINSONS DISEASE 2021; 11:S103-S109. [PMID: 33579873 PMCID: PMC8385507 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-202428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) continues to grow at an unsustainable pace particularly given that it now represents the fastest growing brain disease. Despite seminal discoveries in genetics and pathogenesis, people living with PD oftentimes wait years to obtain an accurate diagnosis and have no way to know their own prognostic fate once they do learn they have the disease. Currently, there is no objective biomarker to measure the onset, progression, and severity of PD along the disease continuum. Without such tools, the effectiveness of any given treatment, experimental or conventional cannot be measured. Such tools are urgently needed now more than ever given the rich number of new candidate therapies in the pipeline. Over the last decade, millions of dollars have been directed to identify biomarkers to inform progression of PD typically using molecular, fluid or imaging modalities. These efforts have produced novel insights in our understanding of PD including mechanistic targets, disease subtypes and imaging biomarkers. While we have learned a lot along the way, implementation of robust disease progression biomarkers as tools for quantifying changes in disease status or severity remains elusive. Biomarkers have improved health outcomes and led to accelerated drug approvals in key areas of unmet need such as oncology. Quantitative biomarker measures such as HbA1c a standard test for the monitoring of diabetes has impacted patient care and management, both for the healthcare professionals and the patient community. Such advances accelerate opportunities for early intervention including prevention of disease in high-risk individuals. In PD, progression markers are needed at all stages of the disease in order to catalyze drug development-this allows interventions aimed to halt or slow disease progression (very early) but also facilitates symptomatic treatments at moderate stages of the disease. Recently, attention has turned to the role of digital health technologies to complement the traditional modalities as they are relatively low cost, objective and scalable. Success in this endeavor would be transformative for clinical research and therapeutic development. Consequently, significant investment has led to a number of collaborative efforts to identify and validate suitable digital biomarkers of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Maria Tome
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lynn Rochester
- Institute of Translational and Clinical Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rochester L, Mazzà C, Mueller A, Caulfield B, McCarthy M, Becker C, Miller R, Piraino P, Viceconti M, Dartee WP, Garcia-Aymerich J, Aydemir AA, Vereijken B, Arnera V, Ammour N, Jackson M, Hache T, Roubenoff R. A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach. Digit Biomark 2020; 4:13-27. [PMID: 33442578 DOI: 10.1159/000512513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Health care has had to adapt rapidly to COVID-19, and this in turn has highlighted a pressing need for tools to facilitate remote visits and monitoring. Digital health technology, including body-worn devices, offers a solution using digital outcomes to measure and monitor disease status and provide outcomes meaningful to both patients and health care professionals. Remote monitoring of physical mobility is a prime example, because mobility is among the most advanced modalities that can be assessed digitally and remotely. Loss of mobility is also an important feature of many health conditions, providing a read-out of health as well as a target for intervention. Real-world, continuous digital measures of mobility (digital mobility outcomes or DMOs) provide an opportunity for novel insights into health care conditions complementing existing mobility measures. Accepted and approved DMOs are not yet widely available. The need for large collaborative efforts to tackle the critical steps to adoption is widely recognised. Mobilise-D is an example. It is a multidisciplinary consortium of 34 institutions from academia and industry funded through the European Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking. Members of Mobilise-D are collaborating to address the critical steps for DMOs to be adopted in clinical trials and ultimately health care. To achieve this, the consortium has developed a roadmap to inform the development, validation and approval of DMOs in Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and recovery from proximal femoral fracture. Here we aim to describe the proposed approach and provide a high-level view of the ongoing and planned work of the Mobilise-D consortium. Ultimately, Mobilise-D aims to stimulate widespread adoption of DMOs through the provision of device agnostic software, standards and robust validation in order to bring digital outcomes from concept to use in clinical trials and health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Rochester
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.,The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Claudia Mazzà
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.,INSIGNEO Institute for in Silico Medicine, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Arne Mueller
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Brian Caulfield
- Insight Centre for Data Analytics, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Clemens Becker
- Robert Bosch Foundation for Medical Research, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Ram Miller
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Piraino
- Research and Early Development Statistics, Bayer, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Judith Garcia-Aymerich
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Aida A Aydemir
- EMD Serono, Billerica, MA, a Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Beatrix Vereijken
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Nadir Ammour
- Sanofi R&D, Clinical Sciences and Operations, Chilly-Mazarin, France
| | | | - Tilo Hache
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ronenn Roubenoff
- Translational Medicine, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|