1
|
Outram SM, Brown J, Ackerman SL. The social value of genomic sequencing for disadvantaged families facing rare disease. Soc Sci Med 2022; 314:115465. [PMID: 36279794 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
This study explores parental expectations and value-making processes in respect to pediatric clinical genomic sequencing for socially disadvantaged families. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic observations with parents of children with undiagnosed physical and/or intellectual differences seeking to find whether these differences have a genetic etiology, we explore expectations and parental assessments of the value of genomic sequencing within the context of an ongoing research study. We demonstrate how the value of sequencing to parents goes well beyond finding diagnostic results or receiving prescriptive guidance as to the best care and treatment of their child; instead, value is co-created by parents, clinicians, and genetic counsellors throughout the enrollment and return of results process. Parents in our study found that clinicians and genetic counsellors repeatedly reenforce that parents need to lower their expectations and be prepared to wait for genetic science to provide more definitive answers. At the same time, parents experience that clinical teams validate parents for having made a good choice in their undertaking of genomic sequencing and, no matter the result, that they are not to blame for their child's symptoms. The experience of many parents (although not all) is that genomic science reduces or removes their sense of guilt for their child's condition, providing a platform that affirms them as "good parents." Moreover, rather than being voiceless and isolated, socially disadvantaged parents who enter into diagnostic sequencing find themselves in a familial-biosocial framework wherein they are co-partners in a socially and biologically authoritative vision of the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Outram
- Program in Bioethics, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Jeh Brown
- Program in Bioethics, Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S L Ackerman
- Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Outram SM, Brown JEH, Zamora AN, Sahin-Hodoglugil N, Ackerman SL. Parental Hopes and Understandings of the Value of Prenatal Diagnostic Genomic Sequencing: A Qualitative Analysis. Front Genet 2022; 13:883225. [PMID: 35923691 PMCID: PMC9339950 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.883225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To provide qualitative empirical data on parental expectations of diagnostic prenatal genomic sequencing and the value of the results to families. Methods: We interviewed 15 families—mothers and/or fathers—who had had prenatal genomic sequencing about their expectations and their respective evaluations of the benefits of genomic sequencing. Results: Families’ hopes for genetic sequencing clustered around three themes: hoping to identify the cause of the fetal anomaly in a terminated pregnancy; hopes for guidance as to the likely outcome of current pregnancy; and hopes for information to support future family planning. In addition, hopes were discussed in terms of the potential for results to be beneficial in acquiring greater knowledge, while at the same time recognizing that new knowledge may raise more questions. Assessment of the value of sequencing largely mirrored these expectations when positive results seen. Negative results can also be seen as valuable in ruling out a genetic cause and in providing certainty that families had done everything that they could to know about the cause of fetal demise. Conclusion: It would appear that with guidance from genetic counsellors, families were largely able to navigate the many uncertainties of prenatal genomic sequencing and thus see themselves as benefitting from sequencing. However, support structures are essential to guide them through their expectations and interpretations of results to minimize possible harms. Engaging in the process of genomic sequencing was seen as beneficial in of itself to families who would otherwise be left without any options to seek diagnostic answers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta A, Cafazzo JA, IJzerman MJ, Swart JF, Vastert S, Wulffraat NM, Benseler S, Marshall D, Yeung R, Twilt M. Genomic Health Literacy Interventions in Pediatrics: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e26684. [PMID: 34951592 PMCID: PMC8742210 DOI: 10.2196/26684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The emergence of genetic and genomic sequencing approaches for pediatric patients has raised questions about the genomic health literacy levels, attitudes toward receiving genomic information, and use of this information to inform treatment decisions by pediatric patients and their parents. However, the methods to educate pediatric patients and their parents about genomic concepts through digital health interventions have not been well-established. Objective The primary objective of this scoping review is to investigate the current levels of genomic health literacy and the attitudes toward receiving genomic information among pediatric patients and their parents. The secondary aim is to investigate patient education interventions that aim to measure and increase genomic health literacy among pediatric patients and their parents. The findings from this review will be used to inform future digital health interventions for patient education. Methods A scoping review using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and protocols was completed using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Our search strategy included genomic information inclusive of all genetic and genomic terms, pediatrics, and patient education. Inclusion criteria included the following: the study included genetic, genomic, or a combination of genetic and genomic information; the study population was pediatric (children and adolescents <18 years) and parents of patients with pediatric illnesses or only parents of patients with pediatric illnesses; the study included an assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and intervention regarding genomic information; the study was conducted in the last 12 years between 2008 and 2020; and the study was in the English language. Descriptive data regarding study design, methodology, disease population, and key findings were extracted. All the findings were collated, categorized, and reported thematically. Results Of the 4618 studies, 14 studies (n=6, 43% qualitative, n=6, 43% mixed methods, and n=2, 14% quantitative) were included. Key findings were based on the following 6 themes: knowledge of genomic concepts, use of the internet and social media for genomic information, use of genomic information for decision-making, hopes and attitudes toward receiving genomic information, experiences with genetic counseling, and interventions to improve genomic knowledge. Conclusions This review identified that older age is related to the capacity of understanding genomic concepts, increased genomic health literacy levels, and the perceived ability to participate in decision-making related to genomic information. In addition, internet-searching plays a major role in obtaining genomic information and filling gaps in communication with health care providers. However, little is known about the capacity of pediatric patients and their parents to understand genomic information and make informed decisions based on the genomic information obtained. More research is required to inform digital health interventions and to leverage the leading best practices to educate these genomic concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarushi Gupta
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre of Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph A Cafazzo
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre of Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Department of Health and Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joost F Swart
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Vastert
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Nico M Wulffraat
- Division of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatric Rheumatology and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Susanne Benseler
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Deborah Marshall
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Rae Yeung
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, AB, Canada.,Immunology and Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, AB, Canada
| | - Marinka Twilt
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Waltz M, Prince AER, O’Daniel JM, Foreman AKM, Powell BC, Berg JS. Referencing BRCA in hereditary cancer risk discussions: In search of an anchor in a sea of uncertainty. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:949-959. [PMID: 31967382 PMCID: PMC7374021 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Revised: 01/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
As panel testing and exome sequencing are increasingly incorporated into clinical care, clinicians must grapple with how to communicate the risks and treatment decisions surrounding breast cancer genes beyond BRCA1 and BRCA2. In this paper, we examine clinicians' practice of employing BRCA1 and BRCA2 to help contextualize less certain genetic information regarding cancer risk and the possible implications of this practice for patients within the context of an exome sequencing study, NCGENES. We audio-recorded return of results appointments for 14 women who participated in NCGENES, previously had breast cancer, and were suspected of having a hereditary cancer predisposition. These patients were also interviewed four weeks later regarding their understanding of their results. We found that BRCA1 and BRCA2 were held as the gold standard, where clinicians compared what is known about BRCA to the limited understanding of other breast cancer-related genes. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were used as anchors to shape patients' understandings of genetic knowledge, risk, and management, illustrating how the information clinicians provide to patients may work as an external anchor. Yet, presenting BRCA1 and BRCA2 as a means of scientific reassurance can run the risk of patients conflating knowledge about certainty of risk with degree of risk after receiving a result for a moderate penetrance gene. This can be further complicated by misperceptions of the precision of cancer predictability attributed to these or other described 'cancer genes' in public media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret Waltz
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Julianne M. O’Daniel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ann Katherine M. Foreman
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Bradford C. Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Patient experience of uncertainty in cancer genomics: a systematic review. Genet Med 2020; 22:1450-1460. [PMID: 32424175 PMCID: PMC7462749 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0829-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
While genomics provides new clinical opportunities, its complexity generates uncertainties. This systematic review aimed to summarize what is currently known about the experience of uncertainty for adult patients undergoing cancer genomic testing. A search of five databases (2001 to 2018) yielded 6508 records. After removing duplicates, abstract/title screening, and assessment of full articles, ten studies were included for quality appraisal and data extraction. Qualitative studies were subjected to thematic analysis, and quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Cancer genomic results reduced uncertainty for patients regarding treatment decisions but did not reduce uncertainty in the risk context. Qualitative and quantitative data synthesis revealed four themes: (1) coexisting uncertainties, (2) factors influencing uncertainty, (3) outcomes of uncertainty, and (4) coping with uncertainty. Uncertainty can motivate, or be a barrier to, pursuing cancer genomic testing. Appraisal of uncertainty influences the patient experience of uncertainty, the outcome of uncertainty for patients, as well as the coping strategies utilized. While this systematic review found that appraisal of uncertainty is important to the patients' experience of uncertainty in the cancer genomic context, more mixed methods longitudinal research is needed to address the complexities that contribute to patient uncertainty across the process.
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong SJ. Uncertainty in the Process of Communicating Cancer-related Genetic Risk Information with Patients: A Scoping Review. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 25:251-270. [PMID: 32271688 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1745963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In the era of precision medicine, patients must manage the uncertainty caused by ambiguous genetic information. To aid health practitioners in effectively communicating genetic information, this study classified the types of uncertainty involved in these communication processes. A search of recent literature turned up 64 articles that measured and/or discussed patients' perceptions and/or feelings of uncertainty related to the communication process of cancer-related genetic information. In reviewing these papers, six types of uncertainty regarding cancer-related genetic information were identified: (1) uncertainty about understanding genetic information (n = 25; 39.1%); (2) uncertainty about future cancer risks (n = 34; 53.1%); (3) uncertainty about managing known genetic information or mutation status (n = 33; 51.6%); (4) uncertainty about the utility of genetic information (n = 5; 7.8%); (5) uncertainty about genetic test results before undergoing testing or receiving the results (n = 10; 15.6%); and (6) uncertainty about the impact of genetic results on family and life (n = 11; 17.2%). These six types of uncertainty serve as a helpful taxonomy for developing, validating, and utilizing future measures of uncertainty in the context of cancer-related genetic risk communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Jung Hong
- Department of Communications and New Media, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neustadt A, Owczarzak J, Mu W, Cohen JS, Erby L. Adult patients with undiagnosed conditions and their responses to unresolved uncertainty from exome sequencing. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:992-1003. [PMID: 32030847 PMCID: PMC10150798 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2019] [Revised: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Patients pursuing exome sequencing (ES) in their quest for diagnosis will most often experience unresolved uncertainty from their ES results because the majority of ES results are non-diagnostic. This study explored and compared the experiences of receiving two types of ES results that may result in diagnostic uncertainty. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted with 23 adult patients with undiagnosed conditions who received either a negative result or a result with one or more variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) from ES. Interviews were transcribed and subjected to thematic and comparative analyses. Participants accurately understood their results and described various sources of genomic uncertainty including probability, complexity, and ambiguity. Their acclimation to illness uncertainty resulted in realistic expectations about and acceptance of their results. Participants still hoped that ES would end their diagnostic odyssey. Hope and optimism were used to cope with continued uncertainty. No thematic differences were found between the experiences of those who received negative results versus those who received VUSs. Our findings may inform clinical practices of informed consent and disclosure of negative results and VUSs through a greater consideration of patients' reactions, concerns, and challenges with adaptation to uncertainty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahna Neustadt
- Department of Health, Behavior, & Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland
- Medical Genomics & Metabolic Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| | - Jill Owczarzak
- Department of Health, Behavior, & Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland
| | - Weiyi Mu
- McKusick‐Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland
| | - Julie S. Cohen
- Department of Neurology & Developmental Medicine Kennedy Krieger Institute Baltimore Maryland
| | - Lori Erby
- Department of Health, Behavior, & Society Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore Maryland
- Medical Genomics & Metabolic Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research InstituteNational Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Griesemer I, Moore E, Khan C, Roche M, Henderson G, Rini C. Psychological adaptation to diagnostic genomic sequencing results: The role of hope fulfillment. Health Psychol 2019; 38:527-535. [PMID: 30958015 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Psychological adaptation is an important but understudied outcome among patients who undergo DNA evaluation to identify a cause of an unexplained health condition. This longitudinal study examines the relationship between the degree to which participants' hopes for diagnostic genomic sequencing were fulfilled and their psychological adaptation to their sequencing results over time. METHOD Secondary analyses were conducted on data from a subset of adult participants from the North Carolina Clinical Genomic Evaluation by Next-Generation Exome Sequencing study with physical health conditions of suspected genetic etiology (such as neurological disorders or cancer; n = 192). Hope fulfillment and type of hope (hopes related to personal-family health implications vs. hoping to help others-advance science) were assessed as predictors of change in psychological adaptation (Psychological Adaptation Scale) and 4 subscales (coping efficacy, self-esteem, social integration, spiritual-existential well-being), from 2 weeks to 6 months after disclosure of genomic sequencing results. RESULTS Controlling for covariates, degree of hope fulfillment was associated with increased general psychological adaptation (β = .14, p = .02), social integration (β = .17, p = .01), and spiritual-existential well-being (β = .15, p = .02). Type of hope did not modify effects of degree of hope fulfillment on adaptation outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The degree to which patients' genomic sequencing-related hopes are fulfilled may be an important driver of long-term psychological adaptation after genomic sequencing. Evaluating the degree to which patients' hopes are fulfilled may allow clinicians to gain insight into the likely trajectory for patient adaptation after learning their results from genomic sequencing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Griesemer
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Elizabeth Moore
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Cynthia Khan
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Myra Roche
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Gail Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Christine Rini
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hull LE, Vassy JL. Toward greater understanding of patient decision-making around genome sequencing. Per Med 2018; 15:57-66. [PMID: 29714114 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
In the era of next-generation sequencing, it is essential to collect and understand the patient outcomes that result from this new technology. One critical determinant of these is the process by which individuals first decide whether and how to pursue genome sequencing. In this perspective article, we examine the literature on adult patient decision-making in genome sequencing and identify current research gaps to address. Several studies have explored the motivations and concerns of patients undergoing sequencing; less attention has been paid to those who decline sequencing or to individuals from lower socioeconomic groups. Many factors that might play a role in the decision to pursue or decline sequencing, including trust, family dynamics and barriers to access, have yet to be explored fully. Future research that captures the experience of the wider population will produce a more generalizable understanding of the clinical, psychosocial, and economic outcomes of pursuing or declining sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leland E Hull
- Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.,Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, 02130, USA
| | - Jason L Vassy
- Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.,Division of General Medicine & Primary Care, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Amendola LM, Berg JS, Horowitz CR, Angelo F, Bensen JT, Biesecker BB, Biesecker LG, Cooper GM, East K, Filipski K, Fullerton SM, Gelb BD, Goddard KA, Hailu B, Hart R, Hassmiller-Lich K, Joseph G, Kenny EE, Koenig BA, Knight S, Kwok PY, Lewis KL, McGuire AL, Norton ME, Ou J, Parsons DW, Powell BC, Risch N, Robinson M, Rini C, Scollon S, Slavotinek AM, Veenstra DL, Wasserstein MP, Wilfond BS, Hindorff LA, Plon SE, Jarvik GP, Jarvik GP. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet 2018; 103:319-327. [PMID: 30193136 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 08/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research (CSER) consortium, now in its second funding cycle, is investigating the effectiveness of integrating genomic (exome or genome) sequencing into the clinical care of diverse and medically underserved individuals in a variety of healthcare settings and disease states. The consortium comprises a coordinating center, six funded extramural clinical projects, and an ongoing National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) intramural project. Collectively, these projects aim to enroll and sequence over 6,100 participants in four years. At least 60% of participants will be of non-European ancestry or from underserved settings, with the goal of diversifying the populations that are providing an evidence base for genomic medicine. Five of the six clinical projects are enrolling pediatric patients with various phenotypes. One of these five projects is also enrolling couples whose fetus has a structural anomaly, and the sixth project is enrolling adults at risk for hereditary cancer. The ongoing NHGRI intramural project has enrolled primarily healthy adults. Goals of the consortium include assessing the clinical utility of genomic sequencing, exploring medical follow up and cascade testing of relatives, and evaluating patient-provider-laboratory level interactions that influence the use of this technology. The findings from the CSER consortium will offer patients, healthcare systems, and policymakers a clearer understanding of the opportunities and challenges of providing genomic medicine in diverse populations and settings, and contribute evidence toward developing best practices for the delivery of clinically useful and cost-effective genomic sequencing in diverse healthcare settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gail P Jarvik
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kauffman TL, Wilfond BS, Jarvik GP, Leo MC, Lynch FL, Reiss JA, Richards CS, McMullen C, Nickerson D, Dorschner MO, Goddard KAB. Design of a randomized controlled trial for genomic carrier screening in healthy patients seeking preconception genetic testing. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 53:100-105. [PMID: 27940182 PMCID: PMC5274557 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Revised: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/03/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Population-based carrier screening is limited to well-studied or high-impact genetic conditions for which the benefits may outweigh the associated harms and costs. As the cost of genome sequencing declines and availability increases, the balance of risks and benefits may change for a much larger number of genetic conditions, including medically actionable additional findings. We designed an RCT to evaluate genomic clinical sequencing for women and partners considering a pregnancy. All results are placed into the medical record for use by healthcare providers. Through quantitative and qualitative measures, including baseline and post result disclosure surveys, post result disclosure interviews, 1-2year follow-up interviews, and team journaling, we are obtaining data about the clinical and personal utility of genomic carrier screening in this population. Key outcomes include the number of reportable carrier and additional findings, and the comparative cost, utilization, and psychosocial impacts of usual care vs. genomic carrier screening. As the study progresses, we will compare the costs of genome sequencing and usual care as well as the cost of screening, pattern of use of genetic or mental health counseling services, number of outpatient visits, and total healthcare costs. This project includes novel investigation into human reactions and responses from would-be parents who are learning information that could both affect a future pregnancy and their own health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tia L Kauffman
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
| | - Benjamin S Wilfond
- Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1900 Ninth Ave, Rm 683, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael C Leo
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Frances L Lynch
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Jacob A Reiss
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - C Sue Richards
- Knight Diagnostic Laboratories, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code MP350, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Carmit McMullen
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| | - Deborah Nickerson
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Box 357720, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael O Dorschner
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 357655, 1959 NE Pacific St., Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Katrina A B Goddard
- Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Newson AJ, Leonard SJ, Hall A, Gaff CL. Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine. BMC Med Genomics 2016; 9:57. [PMID: 27586379 PMCID: PMC5009566 DOI: 10.1186/s12920-016-0219-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Genomic testing has reached the point where, technically at least, it can be cheaper to undertake panel-, exome- or whole genome testing than it is to sequence a single gene. An attribute of these approaches is that information gleaned will often have uncertain significance. In addition to the challenges this presents for pre-test counseling and informed consent, a further consideration emerges over how - ethically - we should conceive of and respond to this uncertainty. To date, the ethical aspects of uncertainty in genomics have remained under-explored. Discussion In this paper, we draft a conceptual and ethical response to the question of how to conceive of and respond to uncertainty in genomic medicine. After introducing the problem, we articulate a concept of ‘genomic uncertainty’. Drawing on this, together with exemplar clinical cases and related empirical literature, we then critique the presumption that uncertainty is always problematic and something to be avoided, or eradicated. We conclude by outlining an ‘ethics of genomic uncertainty’; describing how we might handle uncertainty in genomic medicine. This involves fostering resilience, welfare, autonomy and solidarity. Conclusions Uncertainty will be an inherent aspect of clinical practice in genomics for some time to come. Genomic testing should not be offered with the explicit aim to reduce uncertainty. Rather, uncertainty should be appraised, adapted to and communicated about as part of the process of offering and providing genomic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ainsley J Newson
- Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 1, Medical Foundation Building K25, 92-94, Parramatta Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Samantha J Leonard
- Inserm, Unite 1027, University Toulouse III, Paul Sabatier, France.,Service de Genetique Medicale CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Clara L Gaff
- Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Departments of Paediatrics and Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|