Endothelial keratoplasty in the management of irido-corneal endothelial syndrome

Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study

BACKGROUND

To compare graft survival of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and identify ocular features associated with graft survival.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, cohort study. A total of 30 806 first grafts performed between 1985 and 2020 were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry and included in this observational, prospective cohort study. A total of 196 eyes underwent a primary corneal graft for ICE syndrome. Kaplan-Meier graft survival plots and Chi-squared tests were performed to identify graft survival rates for EK and PK. A history of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was also recorded and analysed. Graft survival of eyes with ICE syndrome were compared to that of other indications.

RESULTS

Grafts performed for ICE syndrome increased to 0.8% of all cases during the 2005 to 2020 period compared with 0.5% between 1985 to 2004 (χ2 =9.35, p = 0.002). From 2010, EK surpassed PK as the preferred graft type. Survival of primary grafts in eyes with ICE syndrome was lower than for other indications (log-rank = 56.62, p < 0.001). Graft survival was higher following PK than Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) (log-rank = 10.56, p = 0.001). Graft survival was higher in eyes without a history of raised IOP compared to those with a reported history of raised IOP (log-rank = 13.06, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE syndrome carries a poor prognosis for graft survival. DS(A)EK had a poorer prognosis than PK. A history of raised IOP is associated with higher risk of graft failure.

Spokewise iridotomy combined with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

Purpose

Iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome is a progressive anterior segment disorder that can be tricky to treat. Keratoplasty is commonly used to treat corneal edema in ICE syndrome. However, glaucoma is an important risk factor affecting graft survival. To address this question, we designed a retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effect of Spokewise Iridotomy (SI) on Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) Grafts in Iridocorneal Endothelial (ICE) Syndrome.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 29 patients were included; 31 eyes with ICE syndrome underwent DSAEK at Peking University Third Hospital between June 2015 and June 2022, including 11 eyes with combined SI during DSAEK. The aim was to explore the effect of SI on vision, glaucoma control, complications, peripheral anterior synechiae recurrence, endothelial cell count, and graft survival.

Results

The median follow-up time was 30.83 months (mo.) in the SI+Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) group and 6.17 mo in the EK group. The 2-year cumulative survival rate of grafts in the SI+EK group was 100%, compared with the 6-month and 1-year cumulative survival rates of 80.2 and 63.2%, respectively, in the EK group (p = 0.043). The SI+EK group had a lower incidence of immediate postoperative complications (p = 0.005), fewer postoperative anti-glaucoma medications (AGMs) (p = 0.029), smaller peripheral anterior synechiae recurrence (p = 0.001), and significant visual acuity improvement (p < 0.05). More AGMs were used in failed grafts (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

SI can help control intraocular pressure, improve visual acuity, and increase graft survival after DSAEK in ICE syndrome patients.

Clinical Outcomes of the Intraocular Lens Injector and Busin Glide for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome

Purpose: To report the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed in iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome patients using the intraocular lens injector (injector), in comparison with those using the Busin glide. Methods: In this retrospective, interventional comparative study, we evaluated the outcomes of DSAEK performed using the injector (n = 12) or the Busin glide (n = 12) for patients with ICE syndrome. Their graft position and postoperative complications were recorded. Their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) were monitored over a 12-month follow-up period. Results: DSAEK was conducted successfully in the 24 cases. The BCVA improved from the preoperative 0.99 ± 0.61 to 0.36 ± 0.35 at 12 months after operation (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups (the injector group and the Busin group) (p = 0.933). ECL at 1 month after DSAEK was 21.80 ± 15.01% in the injector group, which was significantly lower than 33.69 ± 9.75% of the Busin group (p = 0.031). No surgery-related complications were observed in the 24 cases intraoperatively or postoperatively except that one case suffered from postoperative graft dislocation, without statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusions: At 1 month after surgery, the use of graft injector for delivering DSAEK-based endothelial graft may cause significantly less endothelial cell damage than the pull-through technique used in the application of Busin glide. The injector allows safe endothelial graft delivery without the need of anterior chamber irrigation, which increases the ratio of successful graft attachment.

The clinical outcomes of keratoplasty in irreversible corneal decompensation secondary to Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with irreversible corneal decompensation secondary to Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS).

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, a total of four eyes undergoing PK and seven eyes undergoing DSAEK, including one eye requiring one repeat DSAEK, between 2014 and 2021 were enrolled. Postoperative complications, graft survival, glaucoma treatment before and after keratoplasty, visual outcomes, and endothelial cell density were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 34.4 ± 16.8 months. Before keratoplasty, the mean BCVA was 2.0 ± 0.4 LogMAR, and the mean IOP was 21.7 ± 8.1 mmHg. A total of 63.6% of eyes (7/11) received glaucoma treatment, including five eyes with glaucoma surgeries. After keratoplasty, 27.3% of eyes (3/11) exhibited secondary graft failure. The mean BCVA reached a maximum of 0.7 ± 0.5 LogMAR at 8.9 ± 7.5 months, with no significant difference between the PK and DSAEK groups (P₁ = 1.00, P₂ = 0.12). Four eyes with previous glaucoma surgeries exhibited markedly high IOP. A total of 72.7% of eyes (8/11) required additional glaucoma treatments. The mean endothelial cell loss (ECL) rates at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months were 43%, 49%, 63% and 54%, respectively, with no significant difference between the PK and DSAEK groups (P₁ = 0.64, P₂ = 1.00, P₃ = 0.57, and P₄ = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

Both PK and DSAEK can successfully treat corneal decompensation secondary to ARS, resulting in similar outcomes with regard to IOP control, BCVA and ECL. IOP control is essential for postoperative management, especially for eyes with previous glaucoma surgeries.

Outcomes of Descemet-Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty in 52 Eyes With Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) in 52 eyes with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 52 eyes of 52 patients who were diagnosed with ICE syndrome and underwent DSEK between January 2010 and December 2019 with a follow-up of at least 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.8 ± 10.8 years. Female patients (n = 33) constituted 63.5%. The median duration of follow-up was 2.4 years (range, 0.5-9.1 yrs). The mean best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly after surgery and remained stable (∼20/50) through 5 years. The mean endothelial cell loss was 28%, 37.9%, 43.6%, and 56.9% at 6 months and at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Graft rejection was noted in 5 eyes (9.6%). Postoperatively, increased intraocular pressure (IOP) was seen in 17 eyes (32.7%), and 10 eyes (19.2%) underwent glaucoma surgeries. Fourteen eyes (26.9%) had secondary graft failures. The estimates of graft success were 93.6% ± 3.6% at 1 year, 85.6% ± 5.5% at 2 years, 79.3% ± 6.7% at 3 years, 69.0% ± 8.9% at 4 years, and 59.1% ± 11.9% at 5 years. Postoperative increased IOP was found to be the only significant (P = 0.05) risk factor (hazard ratio 8.92) associated with graft failure. The clinical variant of ICE syndrome did not seem to influence the graft survival (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, DSEK had a success rate of ∼60% at 5 years. Increased IOP post-DSEK is a significant risk factor for graft failure. Graft survival is not affected by the clinical variant of ICE syndrome.

Comparison of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome and Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for treating eyes with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and comparing the outcomes with those achieved after treating Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED).

DESIGN

Prospective interventional comparative case series.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients (68 eyes) with ICE syndrome or FED were enrolled at the Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center between March 10, 2014 and May 11, 2018. Eligible patients were divided into 2 groups: ICE group (eyes, 24; patients, 24) and FED group (eyes, 44; patients, 39). DMEK was performed in all cases. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cell loss (ECL), intraocular pressure (IOP), graft survival, and surgical complications were documented.

RESULTS

In the ICE and FED groups, the mean follow-up duration was 24.9 ± 5 months and 25.2 ± 7.7 months, respectively. At 1 year postoperatively, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated 85.7% and 100% cumulative graft success rates (P = .017) in patients with ICE and FED, respectively. Postoperative CDVA level was comparable between the 2 groups through 12-month follow-up; thereafter CDVA was better in the FED group than in the ICE group (P < .001). Moreover, postoperative ECL was significantly higher in the ICE group than in the FED group throughout the follow-up period (P < .001). A discernable increase in structural abnormalities of the anterior chamber angle was observed in 2 eyes (8.3%) in the ICE group; however, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of principal complications between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK provides comparable short-term visual outcomes in the treatment of ICE to those observed in the treatment of FED, with higher postoperative ECL over FED.

Outcomes of Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty combined with near total iridectomy in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

To report the outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) combined with near total iridectomy in the management of iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome with severely disorganised anterior segment. Three patients with ICE syndrome, who had a severely disorganised anterior segment underwent near total iridectomy, with/without cataract surgery, followed by EK at the same time. Mean age was 35 years. Prior to EK, the intraocular pressure (IOP) was in the range of 12-15 mm Hg. One patient (patient 2) had advanced disc damage prior to EK. Two eyes (patients 1 and 2) had a glaucoma drainage device, and in one, the IOP was controlled with two antiglaucoma medications. All grafts were clear, and IOP was well controlled till the last mean follow-up of 53 (range 30-72) months. The outcomes of EK with this surgical approach are favourable and should be considered in selective cases of ICE syndrome.

Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: clinical perspectives

This article aims to review the clinical management strategies available for the rare iridocorneal endothelial syndrome. The different clinical variations as well as the imaging techniques available to aid diagnosis are discussed. We then present the evidence available to help the reader to understand how the condition can be managed medically and also the important surgical aspects of treatment. This involves raised intraocular pressure management in addition to the visual management options of partial or full thickness keratoplasty. We hope that this review provides an exhaustive but also succinct review of the literature available on what is a rare and difficult condition to treat.

Clinical outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in 18 cases with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

PurposeTo evaluate the clinical outcome of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome.Patients and methodsA retrospective case series study was conducted. Eighteen consecutive Chinese patients with 20 DSAEK grafts were enrolled. Participants were evaluated by anterior segment optical coherence tomography and confocal microscopy. Postoperative complications, graft survival, endothelial cell counts, corneal thickness, and anterior chamber depth were analysed. A Log-rank test in a Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazard regression were used to analyse potential risk factors of graft failure.ResultsThe mean follow-up duration was 19.0±8.6 months. The donors' endothelial cell density (ECD) (cells/mm²) values at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months were 3342.2±287.0, 1897.6±745.4, 1793.6±755.7, 1618.1±604.3, 1421.9±650.8, 1265.1±844.1, and 1148.2±1217.8, respectively. Eleven of the 20 grafts exhibited secondary graft failure, with a mean estimated graft survival of 23.4 months. Immediate postoperative complications (air bubble ventilation for elevated intraocular pressure or rebubbling for graft detachment) were more common in eyes exhibiting graft failure (P=0.040). Postkeratoplasty glaucoma surgery emerged as a risk factor of graft failure, with a hazard ratio of 5.174. Eyes with a poor prognosis showed statistically greater central corneal thickness at 1 month, greater graft thickness at 3 months, and a shallower anterior chamber at 6 and 12 months.ConclusionsThe long-term outcome of DSAEK in eyes with ICE syndrome is relatively poor. Immediate postoperative complications, postkeratoplasty glaucoma surgery, thicker corneal parameters, and a shallow anterior chamber were all associated with graft failure.

Graft failure and intraocular pressure control after keratoplasty in iridocorneal endothelial syndrome

PURPOSE

To describe and compare graft survival and intraocular pressure (IOP) control after penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in eyes with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Multicenter study conducted at the Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC) and Price Vision Group. Twenty-nine consecutive eyes with ICE syndrome that underwent keratoplasty between 1991 and 2011 were identified from the SNEC transplant database and Price Vision Group patient database and the following data extracted: demographics, graft failure, IOP indices, and glaucoma treatment pre- and postkeratoplasty. The main outcome measures were graft failure and need for additional IOP-lowering treatment after keratoplasty.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 7.0 ± 4.9 years in the PK group (n = 17) and 4.0 ± 2.6 years in the DSAEK group (n = 12). After a mean of 4.1 ± 3.1 years, 37.9% of grafts (11/29) failed: 7 PK compared to 4 DSAEK (P = .72). The graft failure rate was 50% in eyes with prekeratoplasty glaucoma surgery vs 31.6% in those without (P = .43). Additional glaucoma treatment was required in 37.9% of eyes (11/29): 41.2% of PK eyes and 50% of DSAEK eyes (P = .28) Eyes that had undergone glaucoma surgery before keratoplasty were less likely to require escalation of IOP-lowering therapy postkeratoplasty (9.1% vs 50%, P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of grafts failed after keratoplasty for ICE syndrome at a mean duration of 4 years and additional IOP-lowering treatment was required in 37.9%. Both PK and DSAEK had similar outcomes with regard to graft failure and IOP control.