1
|
Sobocan M, Chandrasekaran D, Sideris M, Blyuss O, Fierheller C, Kalra A, Sia J, Miller RE, Mills-Baldock T, Crusz SM, Sun L, Evans O, Robbani S, Jenkins LA, Ahmed M, Kumar A, Quigley M, Lockley M, Faruqi A, Casey L, Brockbank E, Phadnis S, Trevisan G, Singh N, Legood R, Manchanda R. Patient decision aids in mainstreaming genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: A prospective cohort study. BJOG 2024; 131:848-857. [PMID: 37752678 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate patient preference for short (gist) or detailed/extensive decision aids (DA) for genetic testing at ovarian cancer (OC) diagnosis. DESIGN Cohort study set within recruitment to the Systematic Genetic Testing for Personalised Ovarian Cancer Therapy (SIGNPOST) study (ISRCTN: 16988857). SETTING North-East London Cancer Network (NELCN) population. POPULATION/SAMPLE Women with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial OC. METHODS A more detailed DA was developed using patient and stakeholder input following the principles/methodology of IPDAS (International Patients Decision Aids Standards). Unselected patients attending oncology clinics evaluated both a pre-existing short and a new long DA version and then underwent mainstreaming genetic testing by a cancer clinician. Appropriate inferential descriptive and regression analyses were undertaken. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Satisfaction, readability, understanding, emotional well-being and preference for long/short DA. RESULTS The mean age of patients was 66 years (interquartile range 11), and 85% were White British ethnicity. Of the participants, 74% found DAs helpful/useful in decision-making. Women reported higher levels of satisfaction (86% versus 58%, p < 0.001), right amount of information provided (76.79% versus49.12%, p < 0.001) and improved understanding (p < 0.001) with the long DA compared with the short DA. There was no statistically significant difference in emotional outcomes (feeling worried/concerned/reassured/upset) between 'short' and 'long' DA; 74% of patients preferred the long DA and 24% the short DA. Patients undergoing treatment (correlation coefficient (coef) = 0.603; 95% CI 0.165-1.041, p = 0.007), those with recurrence (coef = 0.493; 95% CI 0.065-0.92, p = 0.024) and older women (coef = 0.042; 95% CI 0.017-0.066, p = 0.001) preferred the short DA. Ethnicity did not affect outcomes or overall preference for long/short DA. CONCLUSIONS A longer DA in OC patients has higher satisfaction without increasing emotional distress. Older women and those undergoing treatment/recurrence prefer less extensive information, whereas those in remission preferred a longer DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Sobocan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Dhivya Chandrasekaran
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michail Sideris
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Oleg Blyuss
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child´s Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Caitlin Fierheller
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Kalra
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jacqueline Sia
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rowan E Miller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tina Mills-Baldock
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex, UK
| | | | - Li Sun
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Olivia Evans
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sadiyah Robbani
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Lucy A Jenkins
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Munaza Ahmed
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ajith Kumar
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mary Quigley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, Essex, UK
| | - Michelle Lockley
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Asma Faruqi
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Laura Casey
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Elly Brockbank
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Saurabh Phadnis
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Naveena Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saeed F, Dahl S, Horowitz RK, Duberstein PR, Epstein RM, Fiscella KA, Allen RJ. Development and Acceptability of a Kidney Therapy Decision Aid for Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Design-Based Research Involving Patients, Caregivers, and a Multidisciplinary Team. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100671. [PMID: 37492114 PMCID: PMC10363565 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Many older adults prefer quality of life over longevity, and some prefer conservative kidney management (CKM) over dialysis. There is a lack of patient-decision aids for adults aged 75 years or older facing kidney therapy decisions, which not only include information on dialysis and CKM but also encourage end-of-life planning. We iteratively developed a paper-based patient-decision aid for older people with low literacy and conducted surveys to assess its acceptability. Study Design Design-based research. Setting and Participants Informed by design-based research principles and theory of behavioral activation, a multidisciplinary team of experts created a first version of the patient-decision aid containing 2 components: (1) educational material about kidney therapy options such as CKM, and (2) a question prompt list relevant to kidney therapy and end-of-life decision making. On the basis of the acceptability input of patients and caregivers, separate qualitative interviews of 35 people receiving maintenance dialysis, and with the independent feedback of educated layperson, we further modified the patient-decision aid to create a second version. Analytical Approach We used descriptive statistics to present the results of acceptability surveys and thematic content analyses for patients' qualitative interviews. Results The mean age of patients (n=21) who tested the patient-decision aid was 80 years and the mean age of caregivers (n=9) was 70 years. All respondents held positive views about the educational component and would recommend the educational component to others (100% patients and caregivers). Most of the patients reported that the question prompt list helped them put concerns into words (80% patients and 88% caregivers) and would recommend the question prompt list to others (95% patients and 100% caregivers). Limitations Single-center study. Conclusions Both components of the patient-decision aid received high acceptability ratings. We plan to launch a larger effectiveness study to test the outcomes of a decision-supporting intervention combining the patient-decision aid with palliative care-based decision coaching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Spencer Dahl
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Robert K. Horowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Paul R. Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ
| | - Ronald M. Epstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Kevin A. Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY
| | - Rebecca J. Allen
- Mount St. Joseph University, School of Behavioral and Natural Sciences, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shickh S, Leventakos K, Lewis MA, Bombard Y, Montori VM. Shared Decision Making in the Care of Patients With Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389516. [PMID: 37339391 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) is a method of care that is suitable for the care of patients with cancer. It involves a collaborative conversation seeking to respond sensibly to the problematic situation of the patient, cocreating a plan of care that makes sense intellectually, practically, and emotionally. Genetic testing to identify whether a patient has a hereditary cancer syndrome represents a prime example of the importance for SDM in oncology. SDM is important for genetic testing because not only results affect current cancer treatment, cancer surveillance, and care of relatives but also these tests generate both complex results and psychological concerns. SDM conversations should take place without interruptions, disruptions, or hurry and be supported, where available, by tools that assist in conveying the relevant evidence and in supporting plan development. Examples of these tools include treatment SDM encounter aids and the Genetics Adviser. Patients are expected to play a key role in making decisions and implementing plans of care, but several evolving challenges related to the unfettered access to information and expertise of varying trustworthiness and complexity in between interactions with clinicians can both support and complicate this role. SDM should result in a plan of care that is maximally responsive to the biology and biography of each patient, maximally supportive of each patient's goals and priorities, and minimally disruptive of their lives and loves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Konstantinos Leventakos
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark A Lewis
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victor M Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kohut K, Morton K, Turner L, Shepherd J, Fenerty V, Woods L, Grimmett C, Eccles DM, Foster C. Patient decision support resources inform decisions about cancer susceptibility genetic testing and risk management: a systematic review of patient impact and experience. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2023; 3:1092816. [PMID: 37395995 PMCID: PMC10311450 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2023.1092816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
Background Patients with genetic cancer susceptibility are presented with complex management options involving difficult decisions, for example about genetic testing, treatment, screening and risk-reducing surgery/medications. This review sought to explore the experience of patients using decision support resources in this context, and the impact on decision-making outcomes. Methods Systematic review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies involving adults with or without cancer who used a decision support resource pre- or post-genetic test for any cancer susceptibility. To gather a broad view of existing resources and gaps for development, digital or paper-based patient resources were included and not limited to decision aids. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise patient impact and experience. Results Thirty-six publications describing 27 resources were included. Heterogeneity of resources and outcome measurements highlighted the multiple modes of resource delivery and personal tailoring acceptable to and valued by patients. Impact on cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes was mixed, but mainly positive. Findings suggested clear potential for quality patient-facing resources to be acceptable and useful. Conclusions Decision support resources about genetic cancer susceptibility are likely useful to support decision-making, but should be co-designed with patients according to evidence-based frameworks. More research is needed to study impact and outcomes, particularly in terms of longer term follow-up to identify whether patients follow through on decisions and whether any increased distress is transient. Innovative, streamlined resources are needed to scale up delivery of genetic cancer susceptibility testing for patients with cancer in mainstream oncology clinics. Tailored patient-facing decision aids should also be made available to patients identified as carriers of a pathogenic gene variant that increases future cancer risks, to complement traditional genetic counselling. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020220460, identifier: CRD42020220460.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Kohut
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
- Clinical Genetics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lesley Turner
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Shepherd
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Vicky Fenerty
- Engagement Services, University of Southampton Library, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Lois Woods
- Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Chloe Grimmett
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M. Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arthur J, Pawate V, Lu Z, Yennurajalingam S, Azhar A, Reddy A, Epner D, Hui D, Tanco K, Delgado Guay MO, Vidal M, Chen M, Bruera E. Helpfulness of Question Prompt Sheet for Patient-Physician Communication Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2311189. [PMID: 37129892 PMCID: PMC10155065 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance There are few robust evaluations of disease-specific question prompt sheets (QPS) in patient-physician communication among patients with advanced cancer. Objective To compare the patient perception of helpfulness, global evaluation, and preference for the QPS vs a general information sheet (GIS), and to examine the effect of the QPS on participants' anxiety, participants' speaking time, number of questions asked, and length of the clinical encounter. Design, Setting, and Participants This controlled, double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted at an outpatient palliative and supportive care clinic in a cancer center in the US. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had a cancer diagnosis, and were undergoing their first outpatient consultation visit with a palliative care physician from September 1, 2017, to May 31, 2019. Data analysis used a modified intention-to-treat design. Data were analyzed from May 18 to June 27, 2022. Intervention QPS, a 25-item list of questions developed by expert palliative care clinicians using a Delphi process and tested among ambulatory advanced cancer patients. The control was GIS, generic information material given routinely to patients seen at the supportive care clinic. Main Outcomes and Measures The main outcome was patient perception of helpfulness. Secondary outcomes included global evaluation and preference of QPS compared with GIS immediately after the encounter. Results A total of 130 patients (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [13.3] years; 79 [60.8%] female) were randomized to receive either QPS (67 patients [51.5%]) or GIS (63 patients [48.5%]). Patients considered QPS and GIS equally helpful, with no statistically significant difference (mean [SD] helpfulness score, 7.2 [2.3] points vs 7.1 [2.7] points; P = .79). The QPS group, compared with the GIS group, had a higher global positive view of the material (mean [SD] global perception score, 7.1 [1.3] vs 6.5 [1.7]; P = .03) and felt it prompted them more to generate new questions (mean [SD] rating, 7.0 [2.9] vs 5.3 [3.5]; P = .005). Of 47 patients asked their preference between the items, more participants preferred the QPS to the GIS in communicating with their physicians (24 patients [51.1%] vs 7 patients [14.9%]; P = .01) at the 4-week follow-up. No significant differences between the QPS and GIS groups were observed regarding participant anxiety, speaking time, number of questions asked, or consultation length (eg, mean [SD] anxiety rating, 2.3 [3.7] vs 1.6 [2.7]; P = .19). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, participants perceived both QPS and GIS as equally helpful, but they had a more positive global view of and preferred the QPS. QPS facilitated generation of new questions without increasing patient anxiety nor prolonging the consultation. The findings provide support for increased adoption and integration of QPS into routine oncologic care. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03287492.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Arthur
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Varsha Pawate
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Zhanni Lu
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Sriram Yennurajalingam
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Ahsan Azhar
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Akhila Reddy
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Daniel Epner
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - David Hui
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Kimberson Tanco
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Marvin Omar Delgado Guay
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Marieberta Vidal
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| | - Minxing Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wiener AA, Neuman HB. Improving shared decision making in virtual breast cancer surgery consultations. Am J Surg 2023; 225:645-649. [PMID: 38577977 PMCID: PMC9579141 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
With the COVID19 pandemic, use of telehealth has expanded rapidly in subspecialties with limited prior telehealth experience. While telehealth offers many opportunities to improve patient convenience, access, and comfort, the virtual platform poses unique challenges for shared decision making. In this review article, we describe what occurs within a standard in-person breast surgery consult and propose a model for an ideal virtual breast surgery consult, including strategies to foster patient engagement and shared decision making. Our model incorporates pre-visit preparation, deliberate pauses, and targeted engagement as ways to encourage patients to integrate information and actively participate in treatment decisions. Intentional strategies such as these must be adopted to improve shared decision making on the virtual platform.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa A Wiener
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Heather B Neuman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Katz ML, Senter L, Reiter PL, Emerson B, Ennis AC, Shane-Carson KP, Aeilts A, Cassingham HR, Schnell PM, Agnese DM, Toland AE, Sweet K. Development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention for women at elevated risk for breast cancer. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 106:163-169. [PMID: 36333195 PMCID: PMC10395484 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.10.348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the development of a web-based, theory-guided narrative intervention that replaces conventional pre-test genetic counseling for women at elevated breast cancer risk. METHODS We used an iterative process that was guided by health behavior theory and feedback from multiple stakeholder groups including: 1) content input from genetic experts; 2) study team input; 3) review of video storyboards, video example, study logo, recruitment materials, post-test patient preference counseling survey, and additional study surveys; 4) video series development; and 5) intervention review and finalization of study-related materials. RESULTS The intervention is patient-centered providing convenience and an opportunity for an individual's preferences for post-test counseling delivery. The intervention's efficacy is being determined in a randomized controlled trial compared to conventional genetic counseling for adherence to recommended guidelines and changes in knowledge, perception of breast cancer risk, breast cancer-specific worry, and satisfaction with counseling. CONCLUSION If efficacious, the intervention may improve the delivery of the genetic testing and counseling process, inform best practices, and reduce the genetic counseling workforce burden. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The developed intervention has the potential to improve the genetic testing and counseling experience for women at elevated risk for breast cancer, inform best practices, and reduce genetic counseling workforce burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mira L Katz
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Paul L Reiter
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brent Emerson
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alysha C Ennis
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Hayley R Cassingham
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Patrick M Schnell
- Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nishida A, Ogawa O. The Effect of a Pre-consultation Tablet-Based Questionnaire on Changes in Consultation Time for First-Visit Patients With Diabetes: A Single-Case Design Preliminary Study. Cureus 2022; 14:e31624. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
9
|
Schulte-Vieting T, Siegle A, Jung C, Villalobos M, Thomas M. Developing a question prompt list for the oncology setting: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1689-1702. [PMID: 34686381 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of existing methods used to develop a Question Prompt List (QPL) for an oncology setting. METHODS We conducted a search of the literature published between 1999 and 2019 in five online databases followed by a hand search, and extracted data on the methods used to develop a QPL. RESULTS A total of 21 studies were included. The review shows differences in the development of older QPLs (1999-2009) and current QPLs (2010-2019). However, most QPLs were developed using interviews or focus groups with patients and an expert session to review or adapt the QPL. Health professionals, patients, and researchers were included in nearly all the studies. CONCLUSION To develop a QPL, it is important to combine several information sources and at least to involve health professionals, patients, and researchers in the development process. Review or evaluation steps can improve the appropriateness and acceptance of a QPL. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Further research is needed to define the type of target population for new QPLs and to develop a framework for their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Schulte-Vieting
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anja Siegle
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, University Hospital, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Röntgenstraße 1, D-69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Corinna Jung
- Medical School Berlin, Rüdesheimer Str. 50, 14197 Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Villalobos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Michael Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Röntgenstraße 1, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gholamzadeh M, Abtahi H, Ghazisaeeidi M. Applied techniques for putting pre-visit planning in clinical practice to empower patient-centered care in the pandemic era: a systematic review and framework suggestion. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:458. [PMID: 33985502 PMCID: PMC8116646 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06456-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the main elements of patient-centered care is an enhancement of patient preparedness. Thus, pre-visit planning assessment tools was emerged to prepare and involve patients in their treatment process. Objective The main objective of this article was to review the applied tools and techniques for consideration of putting pre-visit planning into practice. Methods Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE, and PubMed databases were searched using keywords from January 2001 to November 2020. The review was completed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. Then, qualitative analysis was done to suggest an appropriate framework by mapping the main concepts. Results Out of 385 citations were retrieved in initial database searches, 49 studies from ten countries were included. Applied pre-visit techniques can be classified into eight categories. Our results showed that almost 81% of studies were related to procedures that were done between each visit, while 42% of articles were related to before visits. Accordingly, the main approach of included articles was patient preparedness. While 38 studies reported this approach is effective, three studies reported the effectiveness of such tools as moderate, only two articles believed it had a low effect on improving patient-centered care. Conclusion This survey summarized the characteristics of published studies on pre-visit planning in the proposed framework. This approach could enhance the quality of patient care alongside enhancement patient-provider communication. However, such an approach can also be helpful to control pandemic diseases by reducing unnecessary referrals. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06456-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marsa Gholamzadeh
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th Floor, Fardanesh Alley, Qods Ave, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Abtahi
- Pulmonary and Critical care Medicine Department, Thoracic Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marjan Ghazisaeeidi
- Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 5th Floor, Fardanesh Alley, Qods Ave, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chieng M, Southwell T, Shand G, Humphries A, Heap N, Chapman L. How do hospitals help patients prepare for and participate in outpatient clinics? Intern Med J 2021; 51:1700-1706. [PMID: 33646599 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients attending general medicine outpatient clinics (GM OPC) at hospital face multiple healthcare demands in an environment that has evolved with the clinician at its centre. The ideas, knowledge and understanding that patients bring to their clinic appointments are not well studied in the New Zealand setting. AIMS To assess how hospitals prepare patients for their outpatient appointments and encourage people to participate actively in their own care. METHODS A prospective survey of 50 patients attending follow-up GM OPC was performed. Participants' understanding of the purpose of their appointment and knowledge of their prescription medications was explored using a nine-item questionnaire. Patient-directed hospital communication was then analysed to assess the information supplied to patients. RESULTS Two-thirds (66%) of participants attending follow-up GM OPC recalled being informed of an appointment at the time of leaving hospital; only half (54%) felt they had been informed of the purpose of these appointments. Patient-directed communication was not completed in half (50%) of the analysed discharge letters. One-third (36%) of participants did not have specific questions for their clinic visits. CONCLUSIONS Limited information and support is provided to patients attending follow-up GM OPC and is not tailored to individuals' health literacy. This practice assumes patients have comparable health literacy to clinicians, which may have downstream impacts on the usefulness of the clinic experience. The information that health users bring to clinic may be improved by increasing pre-clinic user engagement and deploying patient-centred tools within the healthcare environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Chieng
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Thomas Southwell
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - George Shand
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Aimee Humphries
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Naomi Heap
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Laura Chapman
- Medical Education Training Unit, North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shickh S, Rafferty SA, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Panchal S, Lorentz J, Ward T, Watkins N, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Glogowski E, Schrader KA, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Chitayat D, Shuman C, Bombard Y. The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care. Genet Med 2021; 23:1086-1094. [PMID: 33654192 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01112-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Alternative models of genetic counseling are needed to meet the rising demand for genomic sequencing. Digital tools have been proposed as a method to augment traditional counseling and reduce burden on professionals; however, their role in delivery of genetic counseling is not established. This study explored the role of the Genomics ADvISER, a digital decision aid, in delivery of genomic counseling. METHODS We performed secondary analysis of 52 pretest genetic counseling sessions that were conducted over the course of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER. As part of the trial, participants were randomized to receive standard counseling or use the tool and then speak with a counselor. A qualitative interpretive description approach using thematic analysis and constant comparison was used for analysis. RESULTS In the delivery of genomic counseling, the Genomics ADvISER contributed to enhancing counseling by (1) promoting informed dialogue, (2) facilitating preference-sensitive deliberation, and (3) deepening personalization of decisions, all of which represent fundamental principles of patient-centered care: providing clear high-quality information, respecting patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs, and providing emotional support. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that our digital tool contributed to enhancing patient-centered care in the delivery of genomic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara A Rafferty
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rita Kodida
- St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Thomas Ward
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Christine Elser
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Chitayat
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Giessen J, Fransen MP, Spreeuwenberg P, Velthuizen M, van Dulmen S, Ausems MGEM. Communication about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background: evaluation of a training program for healthcare professionals. J Community Genet 2021; 12:91-99. [PMID: 33319336 PMCID: PMC7846648 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00497-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Access to breast cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal for patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background due to ineffective communication and lack of healthcare professionals' recommendation. This study examines the effect of a blended training program (Erfo4all) for healthcare professionals on their awareness, knowledge, and self-efficacy towards communication about genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background. In total, 59 breast surgeons and specialized nurses from 16 Dutch hospitals completed an online module and group training. Knowledge, self-assessed awareness, and self-efficacy were assessed before the training and 33 participants also completed a posttest questionnaire 6 months after the training program. We also assessed the perceived applicability and relevance of the training program from healthcare professionals' perspectives. We found a significant increase in self-assessed awareness of the prevalence and impact of limited health literacy and in healthcare professionals' self-efficacy to recognize limited health literacy and to communicate effectively with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background. We did not find an increase in knowledge score. Almost all healthcare professionals reported that they use the techniques learned in the training, such as the teach-back method and plain language, and felt more confident discussing breast cancer genetic counseling. Our results suggest that a blended training program for healthcare professionals has potential to improve their ability to communicate effectively about breast cancer genetic counseling with patients with limited health literacy or a migrant background and offers a promising way to increase the referral rate for these groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanine van der Giessen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam P Fransen
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, P. O. Box 22660, 1100, DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Spreeuwenberg
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), P. O Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mary Velthuizen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), P. O Box 1568, 3500, BN, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P. O Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, P. O. Box 85500, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Satteson ES, Roe AK, Eppler SL, Yao J, Shapiro LM, Kamal RN. Development and Testing of a Question Prompt List for Common Hand Conditions: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45:1087.e1-1087.e10. [PMID: 32693988 PMCID: PMC8080683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A question prompt list (QPL) is a tool that lists possible questions a patient may want to ask their surgeon. Its purpose is to improve patient-physician communication and increase patient engagement. Although QPLs have been developed in other specialties, one does not exist for hand conditions. We sought to develop a QPL for use in the hand surgery clinic using a mixed-methods design. METHODS We drafted a QPL based on prior work outside of hand surgery and then used an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design (both qualitative and quantitative methods) to finalize the QPL. Qualitative evaluation included both a written questionnaire completed by a patient advisory board, hand therapists, and hand surgeons, as well as cognitive interviews conducted with clinic patients using the tool. Revisions to the QPL were made after each phase of qualitative analysis. The final QPL was then evaluated quantitatively using the system usability score (SUS) questionnaire to assess its usability. RESULTS A patient advisory board consisting of 6 patients, 5 hand therapists, and 6 hand surgeons completed the written questionnaire. Thirteen patients completed a cognitive interview of the QPL. We completed a content analysis of the qualitative data and incorporated the findings into the QPL. Twenty patients then reviewed the final QPL pamphlet and completed the SUS questionnaire. The resulting SUS score of 78.8 indicated above-average usability of the QPL tool. CONCLUSIONS The QPL developed in this study, from the perspective of multiple stakeholders, provides a usable tool to engage and prompt patients in asking questions during their visit with their hand surgeon with the potential to improve communication and patient-centered care. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study provides clinicians with a QPL developed for use in the hand surgery clinic setting, aimed at facilitating more thorough patient-provider discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen S Satteson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Allison K Roe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Sara L Eppler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Jeffrey Yao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Lauren M Shapiro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA
| | - Robin N Kamal
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, VOICES Health Policy Research Center, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, Redwood City, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yuen J, Cousens N, Barlow-Stewart K, O'Shea R, Andrews L. Online BRCA1/2 screening in the Australian Jewish community: a qualitative study. J Community Genet 2020; 11:291-302. [PMID: 31879826 PMCID: PMC7295878 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-019-00450-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening programmes for BRCA1/2 Jewish Founder mutations (JFM) in the Jewish community have been advocated internationally. Implementation of these programmes could decrease morbidity and mortality of BRCA1/2 JFM carriers through the uptake of cancer screening strategies and risk-reducing surgery. An online programme offered to the Sydney Jewish community that delivers pre-test information and collects consent for BRCA1/2 JFM testing via a website is currently being evaluated (JeneScreen). Forty-three participants from JeneScreen were invited to participate in a sub-study, of semi-structured pre- and post-result telephone interviews. Eleven participants consented to the sub-study. The interviews explored their experiences regarding the online model of obtaining pre-test genetic information, giving consent and receiving results. Inductive thematic analysis was carried out on the interviews. Overarching themes identified include (1) embracing online testing, (2) the online pre-test experience, (3) the result notification experience, (4) concerns associated with online testing and (5) testing as a responsibility. Overall, participants were highly satisfied with online BRCA1/2 JFM testing, an indication that the a website for pre-test information provision is an acceptable alternative to in-person genetic counselling for BRCA1/2 JFM screening and represents a feasible model for future community screening efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanette Yuen
- Discipline Genetic Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Northern, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
- Cancer Genetics Service, Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, 11 Third Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169610, Singapore.
| | - Nicole Cousens
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Rosie O'Shea
- Discipline Genetic Medicine, Sydney Medical School, Northern, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Genetic Counselling, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hernan R, Cho MT, Wilson AL, Ahimaz P, Au C, Berger SM, Guzman E, Primiano M, Shaw JE, Ross M, Tabanfar L, Chilton I, Griffin E, Ratner C, Anyane-Yeboa K, Iglesias A, Pisani L, Roohi J, Duong J, Martinez J, Appelbaum P, Klitzman R, Ottman R, Chung WK, Wynn J. Impact of patient education videos on genetic counseling outcomes after exome sequencing. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:127-135. [PMID: 31521424 PMCID: PMC9667716 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Growing use of clinical exome sequencing (CES) has led to an increased burden of genomic education. Self-guided educational tools can minimize the educational burden for genetic counselors (GCs). The effectiveness of these tools must be evaluated. METHODS Parents of patients offered CES were randomized to watch educational videos before their visit or to receive routine care. Parents and GCs were surveyed about their experiences following the sessions. The responses of the video (n = 102) and no-video (n = 105) groups were compared. RESULTS GCs reported no significant differences between parents in the video and no-video groups on genetics knowledge or CES knowledge. In contrast, parents' scores on genetics knowledge questions were lower in the video than no-video group (p = 0.007). Most parents reported the videos were informative, and the groups did not differ in satisfaction with GCs or decisions to have CES. CONCLUSION GCs and parents perceived the videos to be beneficial. However, lower scores on genetics knowledge questions highlight the need for careful development of educational tools. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Educational tools should be developed and assessed for effectiveness with the input of all stakeholders before widespread implementation. Better measures of the effectiveness of these educational tools are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hernan
- Sarah Lawrence College, Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Bronxville, NY, USA; Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan T Cho
- Sarah Lawrence College, Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Bronxville, NY, USA; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Ashley L Wilson
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priyanka Ahimaz
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine Au
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara M Berger
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edwin Guzman
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Primiano
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica E Shaw
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith Ross
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leyla Tabanfar
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ilana Chilton
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Griffin
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chana Ratner
- Long Island University, LIU Post Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, Brookville, NY, USA
| | - Kwame Anyane-Yeboa
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alejandro Iglesias
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Pisani
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jasmin Roohi
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jimmy Duong
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josue Martinez
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Klitzman
- G.H. Sergievsky Center and Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth Ottman
- G.H. Sergievsky Center and Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pantoja T, Grimshaw JM, Colomer N, Castañon C, Leniz Martelli J. Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 12:CD001174. [PMID: 31858588 PMCID: PMC6923326 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001174.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health professionals sometimes do not use the best evidence to treat their patients, in part due to unconscious acts of omission and information overload. Reminders help clinicians overcome these problems by prompting them to recall information that they already know, or by presenting information in a different and more accessible format. Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper are defined as information given to the health professional with each patient or encounter, provided on paper, in which no computer is involved in the production or delivery of the reminder. Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper are relatively cheap interventions, and are especially relevant in settings where electronic clinical records are not widely available and affordable. This review is one of three Cochrane Reviews focused on the effectiveness of reminders in health care. OBJECTIVES 1. To determine the effectiveness of manually-generated reminders delivered on paper in changing professional practice and improving patient outcomes. 2. To explore whether a number of potential effect modifiers influence the effectiveness of manually-generated reminders delivered on paper. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and two trials registers on 5 December 2018. We searched grey literature, screened individual journals, conference proceedings and relevant systematic reviews, and reviewed reference lists and cited references of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised and non-randomised trials assessing the impact of manually-generated reminders delivered on paper as a single intervention (compared with usual care) or added to one or more co-interventions as a multicomponent intervention (compared with the co-intervention(s) without the reminder component) on professional practice or patients' outcomes. We also included randomised and non-randomised trials comparing manually-generated reminders with other quality improvement (QI) interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors screened studies for eligibility and abstracted data independently. We extracted the primary outcome as defined by the authors or calculated the median effect size across all reported outcomes in each study. We then calculated the median percentage improvement and interquartile range across the included studies that reported improvement related outcomes, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We identified 63 studies (41 cluster-randomised trials, 18 individual randomised trials, and four non-randomised trials) that met all inclusion criteria. Fifty-seven studies reported usable data (64 comparisons). The studies were mainly located in North America (42 studies) and the UK (eight studies). Fifty-four studies took place in outpatient/ambulatory settings. The clinical areas most commonly targeted were cardiovascular disease management (11 studies), cancer screening (10 studies) and preventive care (10 studies), and most studies had physicians as their target population (57 studies). General management of a clinical condition (17 studies), test-ordering (14 studies) and prescription (10 studies) were the behaviours more commonly targeted by the intervention. Forty-eight studies reported changes in professional practice measured as dichotomous process adherence outcomes (e.g. compliance with guidelines recommendations), 16 reported those changes measured as continuous process-of-care outcomes (e.g. number of days with catheters), eight reported dichotomous patient outcomes (e.g. mortality rates) and five reported continuous patient outcomes (e.g. mean systolic blood pressure). Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper probably improve professional practice measured as dichotomous process adherence outcomes) compared with usual care (median improvement 8.45% (IQR 2.54% to 20.58%); 39 comparisons, 40,346 participants; moderate certainty of evidence) and may make little or no difference to continuous process-of-care outcomes (8 comparisons, 3263 participants; low certainty of evidence). Adding manually-generated paper reminders to one or more QI co-interventions may slightly improve professional practice measured as dichotomous process adherence outcomes (median improvement 4.24% (IQR -1.09% to 5.50%); 12 comparisons, 25,359 participants; low certainty of evidence) and probably slightly improve professional practice measured as continuous outcomes (median improvement 0.28 (IQR 0.04 to 0.51); 2 comparisons, 12,372 participants; moderate certainty of evidence). Compared with other QI interventions, manually-generated reminders may slightly decrease professional practice measured as process adherence outcomes (median decrease 7.9% (IQR -0.7% to 11%); 14 comparisons, 21,274 participants; low certainty of evidence). We are uncertain whether manually-generated reminders delivered on paper, compared with usual care or with other QI intervention, lead to better or worse patient outcomes (dichotomous or continuous), as the certainty of the evidence is very low (10 studies, 13 comparisons). Reminders added to other QI interventions may make little or no difference to patient outcomes (dichotomous or continuous) compared with the QI alone (2 studies, 2 comparisons). Regarding resource use, studies reported additional costs per additional point of effectiveness gained, but because of the different currencies and years used the relevance of those figures is uncertain. None of the included studies reported outcomes related to harms or adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper as a single intervention probably lead to small to moderate increases in outcomes related to adherence to clinical recommendations, and they could be used as a single QI intervention. It is uncertain whether reminders should be added to other QI intervention already in place in the health system, although the effects may be positive. If other QI interventions, such as patient or computerised reminders, are available, they should be preferred over manually-generated reminders, but under close evaluation in order to decrease uncertainty about their potential effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Pantoja
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | - Jeremy M Grimshaw
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteClinical Epidemiology ProgramThe Ottawa Hospital ‐ General Campus501 Smyth Road, Box 711OttawaONCanadaK1H 8L6
| | - Nathalie Colomer
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | - Carla Castañon
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | - Javiera Leniz Martelli
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of MedicineCentro Medico San Joaquin, Vicuña Mackenna 4686MaculSantiagoChile
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schmidlen T, Sturm AC, Hovick S, Scheinfeldt L, Scott Roberts J, Morr L, McElroy J, Toland AE, Christman M, O'Daniel JM, Gordon ES, Bernhardt BA, Ormond KE, Sweet K. Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1111-1129. [PMID: 29460110 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0230-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
With the advent of widespread genomic testing for diagnostic indications and disease risk assessment, there is increased need to optimize genetic counseling services to support the scalable delivery of precision medicine. Here, we describe how we operationalized the reciprocal engagement model of genetic counseling practice to develop a framework of counseling components and strategies for the delivery of genomic results. This framework was constructed based upon qualitative research with patients receiving genomic counseling following online receipt of potentially actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomics reports. Consultation with a transdisciplinary group of investigators, including practicing genetic counselors, was sought to ensure broad scope and applicability of these strategies for use with any large-scale genomic testing effort. We preserve the provision of pre-test education and informed consent as established in Mendelian/single-gene disease genetic counseling practice. Following receipt of genomic results, patients are afforded the opportunity to tailor the counseling agenda by selecting the specific test results they wish to discuss, specifying questions for discussion, and indicating their preference for counseling modality. The genetic counselor uses these patient preferences to set the genomic counseling session and to personalize result communication and risk reduction recommendations. Tailored visual aids and result summary reports divide areas of risk (genetic variant, family history, lifestyle) for each disease to facilitate discussion of multiple disease risks. Post-counseling, session summary reports are actively routed to both the patient and their physician team to encourage review and follow-up. Given the breadth of genomic information potentially resulting from genomic testing, this framework is put forth as a starting point to meet the need for scalable genetic counseling services in the delivery of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Schmidlen
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA
| | - Amy C Sturm
- Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, USA.,Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2012 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA
| | - Shelly Hovick
- School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43214, USA
| | - Laura Scheinfeldt
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA
| | - J Scott Roberts
- Department of Health Behavior & Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lindsey Morr
- School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43214, USA
| | - Joseph McElroy
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Center for Biostatistics, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2012 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA
| | - Michael Christman
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA
| | - Julianne M O'Daniel
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Erynn S Gordon
- Coriell Institute for Medical Research, 403 Haddon Avenue, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.,Genome Medical, Monterey, CA, 93940, USA
| | - Barbara A Bernhardt
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Department of Genetics and Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 2012 Kenny Road, Columbus, OH, 43221, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lamort-Bouché M, Sarnin P, Kok G, Rouat S, Péron J, Letrilliart L, Fassier JB. Interventions developed with the Intervention Mapping protocol in the field of cancer: A systematic review. Psychooncology 2018; 27:1138-1149. [PMID: 29247578 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Revised: 10/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Intervention Mapping (IM) protocol provides a structured framework to develop, implement, and evaluate complex interventions. The main objective of this review was to identify and describe the content of the interventions developed in the field of cancer with the IM protocol. Secondary objectives were to assess their fidelity to the IM protocol and to review their theoretical frameworks. METHODS Medline, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PASCAL, FRANCIS, and BDSP databases were searched. All titles and abstracts were reviewed. A standardized extraction form was developed. All included studies were reviewed by 2 reviewers blinded to each other. RESULTS Sixteen studies were identified, and these reported 15 interventions. The objectives were to increase cancer screening participation (n = 7), early consultation (n = 1), and aftercare/quality of life among cancer survivors (n = 7). Six reported a complete participatory planning group, and 7 described a complete logic model of the problem. Ten studies described a complete logic model of change. The main theoretical frameworks used were the theory of planned behaviour (n = 8), the transtheoretical model (n = 6), the health belief model (n = 6), and the social cognitive theory (n = 6). The environment was rarely integrated in the interventions (n = 4). Five interventions were reported as effective. CONCLUSIONS Culturally relevant interventions were developed with the IM protocol that were effective to increase cancer screening and reduce social disparities, particularly when they were developed through a participative approach and integrated the environment. Stakeholders' involvement and the role of the environment were heterogeneously integrated in the interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Lamort-Bouché
- UMRESTTE UMR T 9405, Unité Mixte de Recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Philippe Sarnin
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GREPS-EA 4163), Univ Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Gerjo Kok
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sabrina Rouat
- Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (GREPS-EA 4163), Univ Lyon, Université Lumière Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Julien Péron
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive LBBE-UMR 5558, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Collège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Health Services and Performance Research (HESPER-EA 7425), Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Université Lyon 2, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Fassier
- UMRESTTE UMR T 9405, Unité Mixte de Recherche Epidémiologique et de Surveillance Transport Travail Environnement, Univ Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.,Service de Médecine et Santé au Travail, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cousens N, Kaur R, Meiser B, Andrews L. Community attitudes towards a Jewish community BRCA1/2 testing program. Fam Cancer 2017; 16:17-28. [PMID: 27480161 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9918-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
About 2.5 % of the Ashkenazi-Jewish population carry one of three "founder" mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2). Currently, testing is offered to Jewish people with a personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer; however less than half of BRCA1/2 carriers within the Jewish population are aware of their family history. Population-based testing in other countries has shown to greatly increase the number of mutation carriers identified, compared to targeted testing of people with a family history. We aimed to assess the Australian Jewish community's attitudes towards such a program, including acceptability and interest in having education and testing offered online. Members of Sydney-based Jewish organisations who self-identified as being Jewish were invited by e-mail to participate in an online survey. Of 370 individuals who completed the survey, 96.8 % supported a Jewish community-based BRCA1/2 testing program, and 65.6 % reported being personally interested in undergoing the test. Younger adults aged below 50 years were more interested in undergoing the test than those aged 50 years and above. Almost half (42.9 %) were aware of a family member with breast and/or ovarian cancer; however, of these, 77.1 % had not yet undergone testing. Sixty-five (65.1 %) percent were satisfied with providing consent online, while only 39.6 % of participants' first preference for method of information provision was online. Given the high level of support, and interest in a community testing program, the development and evaluation of a cost-effective and interactive, online BRCA1/2 community testing program appears warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Cousens
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rajneesh Kaur
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lesley Andrews
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mills R, Ensinger M, Callanan N, Haga SB. Development and Initial Assessment of a Patient Education Video about Pharmacogenetics. J Pers Med 2017; 7:jpm7020004. [PMID: 28587070 PMCID: PMC5491980 DOI: 10.3390/jpm7020004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Revised: 04/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As few patient-friendly resources about pharmacogenetics are currently available, we aimed to create and assess a patient educational video on pharmacogenetic testing. A primary literature and resources review was conducted to inform the content and the format of the video. The educational video was then created using a commercially available animation program and pilot tested in focus groups of the general public and by an online survey of pharmacists. Emerging themes from the focus groups and survey indicate a desire for appropriate risk contextualization and specific examples when pharmacogenetic testing may be beneficial. Focus group participants also expressed a preference for a video with live action, and more text to reinforce concepts. Pharmacists generally felt that the video was understandable for patients and relevant for decision-making regarding testing. Using this initial feedback and the identification of important concepts to include in pharmacogenetics educational tools, we plan to revise the video, perform additional evaluations, and publish the video for public use in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Mills
- Duke University Department of Medicine, Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, 304 Research Drive, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Megan Ensinger
- OhioHealth Genetic Counseling Program, Bing Cancer Center, 500 Thomas Ln Ste 2D Columbus, Columbus, OH 43214, USA.
| | - Nancy Callanan
- University of North Carolina, Greensboro School of Health and Human Services, Genetic Counseling Program, 1400 Spring Garden St. Greensboro, Greensboro, NC 27412, USA.
| | - Susanne B Haga
- Duke University Department of Medicine, Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, 304 Research Drive, Box 90141, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
van Dulmen S, Driesenaar JA, van Weert JC, van Osch M, Noordman J. PatientVOICE: Development of a Preparatory, Pre-Chemotherapy Online Communication Tool for Older Patients With Cancer. JMIR Res Protoc 2017; 6:e85. [PMID: 28490421 PMCID: PMC5443916 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.6979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/24/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Good communication around cancer treatment is essential in helping patients cope with their disease and related care, especially when this information is tailored to one’s needs. Despite its importance, communication is often complex, in particular in older patients (aged 65 years or older). In addition to the age-related deterioration in information and memory processing older patients experience, communication is also complicated by their required yet often unmet role of being an active, participatory patient. Older patients rarely express their informational needs and their contributions to consultations are often limited. Therefore, older patients with cancer need to be prepared to participate more actively in their care and treatment. Objective The objective of this paper was to report the development of PatientVOICE, an online, preparatory tool with audio facility aimed to enhance the participation of older patients during educational nursing encounters preceding chemotherapy and to improve their information recall. Methods PatientVOICE was developed by applying the following 6 steps of the intervention mapping framework that involved both patients and nurses: (1) needs assessment, (2) specifying determinants and change objectives, (3) reviewing and selecting theoretical methods and practical strategies, (4) developing intervention components, (5) designing adoption and implementation, and (6) making an evaluation plan. Results A careful execution of these consecutive steps resulted in the ready-to-use preparatory website. PatientVOICE provides pre-visit information about chemotherapy (ie, medical information, side effects, and recommendations of dealing with side effects), information about the educational nursing visit preceding chemotherapy (ie, aim, structure, and recommendations for preparation), techniques to improve patients’ communication skills using a question prompt sheet (QPS) and video-modeling examples showing “best practices”, and the opportunity to upload and listen back to an audio recording of a patient’s own nursing visit. Conclusions The development process resulted in PatientVOICE, a multi-component online intervention targeted to older patients with cancer. PatientVOICE contains information about the treatment as well as information about the role of the patient during treatment. Using different methods (QPS and audio facility), we hope to support these patients during their treatment. In the future, the utility and usability of this complex intervention will be evaluated in a group of older patients who receive or have received chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra van Dulmen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Jeanine A Driesenaar
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Julia Cm van Weert
- Amsterdam School of Communication Research (AScoR), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mara van Osch
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Purkaple BA, Mold JW, Chen S. Encouraging Patient-Centered Care by Including Quality-of-Life Questions on Pre-Encounter Forms. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14:221-6. [PMID: 27184992 PMCID: PMC4868560 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient participation in clinical decision making improves outcomes, including quality of life (QOL), but the typical problem-oriented approach may impede consideration of functional goals. We wondered if patients could encourage primary care physicians to pay attention to their QOL goals by writing them on pre-encounter forms. METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the impact of 2 different pre-visit questionnaires on the content of patient-physician encounters in a family medicine practice at an academic medical center. Using investigator-blinded block randomization, we arranged for 8 faculty and 8 resident physicians to participate in 2 intervention and 2 control videotaped encounters each for a total of 64 encounters. The intervention questionnaire included questions about QOL goals and concerns, while the control questionnaire asked about symptoms. Videotapes were reviewed to determine whether the patients' QOL goals were mentioned and whether they were used in decision making. We also scored encounters using Modified Flanders Interaction Analysis, which assesses and codifies patient and physician communication, and the Modified Carkhuff-Truax Scale, which measures empathy, attending, congruence, and positive regard. RESULTS Patients were able to record QOL goals and concerns, but QOL issues were mentioned in only 2 of the 64 encounters, once by a patient and once by a physician. In neither case was this information used in decision making. More empathy was expressed by physicians during control encounters (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS Patients were able to articulate their QOL goals on paper, but that did not prime them or their physicians to alter the process or content of the clinical encounters. In fact, providing QOL information was associated with reduced physician empathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Becky A Purkaple
- University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - James W Mold
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Sixia Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
de Geus E, Eijzenga W, Menko FH, Sijmons RH, de Haes HCJM, Aalfs CM, Smets EMA. Design and Feasibility of an Intervention to Support Cancer Genetic Counselees in Informing their At-Risk Relatives. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:1179-1187. [PMID: 27103421 PMCID: PMC5114329 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9948-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cancer genetic counselees receive individualized information regarding heightened risks and medical recommendations which is also relevant for their at-risk relatives. Unfortunately, counselees often insufficiently inform these relatives. We designed an intervention aimed at improving counselees’ knowledge regarding which at-risk relatives to inform and what information to disclose, their motivation to disclose, and their self-efficacy. The intervention, offered by telephone by trained psychosocial workers, is based on the principles of Motivational Interviewing. Phase 1 of the intervention covers agenda setting, exploration, and evaluation, and phase 2 includes information provision, enhancing motivation and self-efficacy, and brainstorming for solutions to disseminate information within the family. Fidelity and acceptability of the intervention were assessed using recordings of intervention sessions and by counselee self-report. A total of 144 counselees participated. Psychosocial workers (n = 5) delivered the intervention largely as intended. Counselees highly appreciated the content of the intervention and the psychosocial workers who delivered the intervention. In the sessions, psychosocial workers provided additional and/or corrective information, and brainstorming for solutions was performed in 70 %. These results indicate that this intervention is feasible and warrants testing in clinical practice. For this, a randomized controlled trial is currently in progress to test the intervention’s efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eveline de Geus
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Eijzenga
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fred H Menko
- Cancer Family Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rolf H Sijmons
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Medical Centre Groningen, University Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke C J M de Haes
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cora M Aalfs
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Miller N, Rogers SN. A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the Patient Concerns Inventory. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 27. [PMID: 26989045 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
A question prompt list (QPL) is a simple and inexpensive communication tool used to facilitate patient participation in medical consultations. The QPL is composed of a structured list of questions and has been shown to be an effective way of helping ensure patients' individual information needs are appropriately met. This intervention has been investigated in a variety of settings but not specifically head and neck cancer (HNC). The aim of this paper was to perform a narrative review of literature reporting the use of a QPL for oncology patients and to draw comparison to the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI-HN). The databases Scopus, PubMed and MEDLINE were searched using the key terms 'question prompt list', 'question prompt sheet', 'cancer' and 'oncology'. Of 98 articles hand searched, 30 of which were found to meet all inclusion criteria, and described in a tabulated summary. The studies concluded that the QPL was an effective intervention, enabling active patient participation in medical consultations. The PCI-HN is specific for HNC and differs from many QPLs, which are more general cancer tools. The QPL approach should prove to be a useful intervention for HNC sufferers, however further research into the clinical utility is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Miller
- Liverpool University, Liverpool, UK
| | - S N Rogers
- Evidence-Based Practice Research Centre (EPRC), Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.,University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Albada A, van Dulmen S, Dijkstra H, Wieffer I, Witkamp A, Ausems MGEM. Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:279-89. [PMID: 26321750 PMCID: PMC4799246 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9869-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
We studied counselees’ expressed understanding of the risk estimate and surveillance recommendation in the final consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling in relation with their risk perception, worry and cancer surveillance adherence 1 year post-counseling. Consecutive counselees were included from 2008 to 2010. Counselees with an indication for diagnostic DNA-testing for themselves or a breast cancer affected relative were requested to complete online questionnaires before and after counseling and one year after counseling (N = 152–124). Self-reported surveillance was compared to surveillance recommendations. Consultations were videotaped. Counselees’ reactions to the risks and recommendations were coded. Statements about the risk perception and surveillance intentions of breast cancer unaffected counselees were transcribed. Associations with outcomes were explored. Almost all breast cancer unaffected counselees (>90 %) reacted to their risk estimate with an utterance indicating understanding and this reaction was not significantly associated with their post-visit risk perception alignment. Over one-third (38.6 %) overestimated their risk post-counseling. Few counselees (5.8 %) expressed surveillance intentions. One year after counseling, about three-quarters (74.0 %) of the breast cancer unaffected counselees had adhered to the surveillance recommendation. Almost one-quarter (23.3 %) had performed more mammograms/MRI scans than recommended, which was associated with prior mammography uptake (n = 47; X2 = 5.2; p = .02). Counselees’ post-counseling overestimation of their risk, high levels of worry and high surveillance uptake were not reflected in their reactions to the counselor’s information during the final visit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akke Albada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Health Sciences, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Drammen, Norway
| | - Henrietta Dijkstra
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivette Wieffer
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Walser SA, Kellom KS, Palmer SC, Bernhardt BA. Comparing genetic counselor's and patient's perceptions of needs in prenatal chromosomal microarray testing. Prenat Diagn 2015; 35:870-8. [PMID: 25995037 DOI: 10.1002/pd.4624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 05/17/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chromosome microarray analysis is poised to take a significant place in the prenatal setting given its increased yield over standard karyotyping, but concerns regarding ethical and counseling challenges remain, especially associated with the risk of uncertain and incidental findings. Guidelines recommend patients receiving prenatal screening to undergo genetic counseling prior to testing, but little is known about women's specific pre-testing and post-testing informational needs, as well as their preference for return of various types of results. METHODS The present study surveys 199 prenatal genetic counselors who have counseled patients undergoing chromosome microarray analysis testing and 152 women who have undergone testing on the importance of understanding pre-test information, return of various types of results, and resources made available following an abnormal finding. RESULTS Counselors and patients agree on many aspects, although findings indicate patients consider all available information very important, while genetic counselors give more varying ratings. CONCLUSION Counseling sessions would benefit from information personalized to a patient's particular needs and a shared decision-making model, to reduce informational overload and avoid unnecessary anxiety. Additionally, policies regarding the return of various types of results are needed. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Walser
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katherine S Kellom
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Steven C Palmer
- Abramson Cancer Center, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Barbara A Bernhardt
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sansoni JE, Grootemaat P, Duncan C. Question Prompt Lists in health consultations: A review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:S0738-3991(15)00258-X. [PMID: 26104993 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2014] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/24/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review examines the use and effectiveness of Question Prompt Lists (QPL) as communication aids to enhance patient question asking, information provision to patients and patient participation in health and medical consultations. METHODS A systematic search was undertaken to identify relevant literature concerning QPLs including academic databases, Google-based and snowball searching. Forty-two relevant studies reporting 50 interventions were identified. RESULTS Although findings varied there was some evidence that a QPL endorsed by the physician increased total question asking. Using a QPL increased question asking concerning specific content areas (e.g. prognosis). There was some evidence that physicians provided more information during consultations. There were no consistent findings concerning effects on patient knowledge recall, anxiety and satisfaction or consultation time. Some interventions that increased question asking had longer consultation times. CONCLUSION There is evidence that an appropriate QPL, endorsed by the physician and provided immediately before the consultation, may increase patient question asking and lead to more information being provided by the physician. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS There is increasing evidence to support QPL use in routine practice. Further trials might address the issues identified including an assessment of QPL optimal length and QPL adaptation for cultural and special needs groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet E Sansoni
- Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
| | - Pam Grootemaat
- Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Cathy Duncan
- Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rodriguez K, Kaselitz E, Wong J, Ligard S, Peck D, Hugo Mena V, Gordillo F, Serlin D, Heisler M. Improving preclinic preparation for patients with chronic conditions in quito, ecuador: a randomized controlled trial. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE 2015; 2015:724245. [PMID: 25883805 PMCID: PMC4390100 DOI: 10.1155/2015/724245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2014] [Revised: 02/16/2015] [Accepted: 03/01/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Objectives. As in many settings, patients in community health centers in Ecuador do not complete previsit forms or receive assistance to identify questions and concerns they would like to address in brief clinic visits with physicians. We examined the comparative effectiveness of providing (1) a previsit form to complete; (2) a previsit form along with assistance in completing the form; and (3) usual care. Methods. Parallel, three-arm randomized controlled trial in two health centers serving indigent to low-income communities in Quito, Ecuador, among 199 adult patients who took medications for at least one chronic condition. Outcome measures were self-reported satisfaction with the visit, confidence in asking questions, and extent to which patients' objectives were met. Results. Patients who received assistance in completing a previsit form were more than twice as likely as participants in usual care to report achieving everything they wanted during their visit (AOR 2.2, P = 0.039). There were no differences in any outcomes between the groups who received the previsit form with no assistance and usual care. Conclusions. For high-quality patient-centered primary care, it is important to develop and test innovative and scalable interventions for patients and physicians to make the best use of limited clinic time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. Rodriguez
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - E. Kaselitz
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans' Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - J. Wong
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - S. Ligard
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - D. Peck
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - V. Hugo Mena
- Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador (PUCE) Medical School, P.O. Box 17012184, Quito, Ecuador
| | - F. Gordillo
- Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador (PUCE) Medical School, P.O. Box 17012184, Quito, Ecuador
| | - D. Serlin
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - M. Heisler
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans' Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
- Michigan Center for Diabetes Translational Research (MCDTR), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor VA, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Eijzenga W, Aaronson NK, Hahn DEE, Sidharta GN, van der Kolk LE, Velthuizen ME, Ausems MGEM, Bleiker EMA. Effect of routine assessment of specific psychosocial problems on personalized communication, counselors’ awareness, and distress levels in cancer genetic counseling practice: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2015; 32:2998-3004. [PMID: 25049325 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.4576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the efficacy of a cancer genetics–specific questionnaire in facilitating communication about, awareness of, and management of psychosocial problems, as well as in lowering distress levels. METHODS Individuals referred to genetic counseling for cancer at two family cancer clinics in The Netherlands were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group. All participants completed the psychosocial questionnaire before counseling. In the intervention group, the counselors received the results of this questionnaire before the counseling session. All sessions were audiotaped for content analysis. Primary outcomes were the frequency with which psychosocial problems were discussed, the genetic counselors’ awareness of these problems, and their management. Secondary outcomes included cancer worries and psychological distress, duration and dynamics of the counseling, and satisfaction. RESULTS The frequency with which psychosocial problems were discussed with 246 participating counselees was significantly higher in the intervention group (n = 127) than in the control group (n =119; P = .004), as was the counselors’ awareness of psychosocial problems regarding hereditary predisposition (P < .001), living with cancer (P = .01), and general emotions (P < .001). Counselors initiated more discussion of psychosocial problems in the intervention group (P < .001), without affecting the length of the counseling session. No significant differences were found on management (P = .19). The intervention group reported significantly lower levels of cancer worries (p = .005) and distress (p = .02) after counseling. CONCLUSION The routine assessment of psychosocial problems by questionnaire facilitates genetic counselors’ recognition and discussion of their clients’ psychosocial problems and reduces clients’ distress levels.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cancer genetic counselor information needs for risk communication: a qualitative evaluation of interview transcripts. J Pers Med 2015; 3. [PMID: 24358447 PMCID: PMC3865845 DOI: 10.3390/jpm3030238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Personalized medicine is a model of healthcare that is predictive, personalized, preventive and participatory (“P4 Medicine”). Genetic counselors are an ideal group to study when designing tools to support cancer P4 Medicine activities more broadly. The goal for this work was to gain a better understanding of the information cancer genetic counselors seek from their patients to facilitate effective information exchange for discussing risk. This was an analysis of a qualitative data set from interviews of eight cancer genetic counselors, recruited from three institutions. Genetic counselors at each site were interviewed using a semi-structured, open-ended questionnaire. A selective coding approach was used to determine major themes associated with genetic counseling information needs for communicating risk. We generated a model for understanding categories of genetic counseling information needs to support risk communication activities. Common activities for risk communication included risk assessment and tailoring communication. Categories of information needs included: (a) clinical patient characteristics, (b) social and cognitive patient characteristics and (c) patient motivation and goals for the genetic counseling session. A logical next step is for this model to inform the design of software systems for pre-visit patient planning and delivering just-in-time educational information to facilitate cancer risk communication activities.
Collapse
|
32
|
Albada A, van Dulmen S, Spreeuwenberg P, Ausems MGEM. Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2015; 98:69-76. [PMID: 25455796 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2014] [Revised: 09/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/04/2014] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pre-counseling education helps counselees to prepare for breast cancer genetic counseling and might subsequently result in more positive experiences, improved cognitive outcomes and more experienced control. This study assessed the effects of a website with tailored information and a blank sheet to fill in questions (question prompt; QP), at 1 week and 1 year post-counseling. METHODS Consecutive counselees were randomized to the usual care group (UC) or the intervention group (UC+website+QP). Counselees completed questionnaires pre- and post-counseling and 1 year follow-up. We conducted multilevel regression analyses corrected for time. RESULTS Intervention group counselees (n = 103) were more satisfied about their final visit (β = .35; CI: .06-.65; P = .02; n = 156) than UC group counselees (n = 94). Intervention group counselees also reported more positive experiences with the counseling (β = .32; CI: .06-.59; P = .02; n = 188) and higher perceived personal control 1 year post-counseling (β = .51; CI: .18-.84; P = .002; n = 193). No significant effects were found on recall, knowledge, anxiety, cancer worry, risk perception alignment and adherence to breast surveillance advice. CONCLUSION This study shows that pre-counseling education providing tailored information and QP, might lead to improvements in experiences with the counseling and perceived personal control 1 year post-counseling. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Online pre-visit information is a feasible tool to enhance counselees' experiences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akke Albada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sandra van Dulmen
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Health Science, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Drammen, Norway
| | - Peter Spreeuwenberg
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van Bruinessen IR, van Weel-Baumgarten EM, Snippe HW, Gouw H, Zijlstra JM, van Dulmen S. Active patient participation in the development of an online intervention. JMIR Res Protoc 2014; 3:e59. [PMID: 25379679 PMCID: PMC4259996 DOI: 10.2196/resprot.3695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 09/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background An important and challenging part of living with cancer relates to the repeated visits to the hospital. Since how patients cope between these post-diagnostic visits depends partly on the information and support received from their physician during the visits, it is important to make the most of them. Recent findings reinforce the importance of training not only the health care professionals in communication skills, but providing patients with support in communication as well. Delivering such supportive interventions online can have potential benefits in terms of accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and ability to tailor information to personal needs. However, problems with attrition (dropout, non-usage) during the test phase and poor uptake after implementation are frequently reported. The marginal level of engagement of the patient as end user seems to play a role in this. Therefore, recent research suggests integrating theory-based development methods with methods that promote involvement of the patient at an early stage. This paper describes a participatory protocol, used to let patients guide a theory-informed development process. Objective The objective of this project was to apply a bottom-up inspired procedure to develop a patient-centered intervention with corresponding evaluation and implementation plan. Methods The applied development protocol was based on the intervention mapping framework, combined with patient participatory methods that were inspired by the participation ladder and user-centred design methods. Results The applied protocol led to a self-directed online communication intervention aimed at helping patients gain control during their communications with health care professionals. It also led to an evaluation plan and an implementation plan. The protocol enabled the continuous involvement of patient research partners and the partial involvement of patient service users, which led to valuable insights and improvements. Conclusions The applied protocol realized patient participation on different levels throughout the entire project. Early involvement, involvement on different levels, and flexibility in terms of planning and setup seem to be preconditions to creating a bottom-up inspired development procedure with (seriously ill) patients. Further research is necessary to find out if a more patient-centered approach improves the implementation and uptake of eHealth interventions. Trial Registration Netherlands National Trial Register ID number: NTR3779; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=3779 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6TdfALKxV).
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Background. Advances in genetic science and biotechnology accumulated huge knowledge of genes and various genetic tests and diagnostic tools for healthcare providers including nurses. Genetic counseling became important to assist patients making decisions about obtaining genetic testing or preventive measures. Method. This review was conducted to describe the counseling topics, various interventions adopted in genetic counseling, and their effectiveness. Experimental studies (N=39) published between 1999 and 2012 were synthesized. Results. The most frequently covered topic was benefits and limitations of genetic testing on breast cancer ovarian and colorectal cancers. Most of researchers focused on evaluating cognitive aspect and psychological well-being. Conclusion. No single intervention was consistently reported to be effective. Decision aids enhanced with information technologies have potential to improve the outcomes of genetic counseling by providing tailored information and facilitating active engagement of patients in information uptake. Clinical Implication. When nurses are familiar with topics and interventions of genetic counseling, they are well positioned to provide genetic/genomic information to the patient and families.
Collapse
|
35
|
Hamann J, Maris N, Iosifidou P, Mendel R, Cohen R, Wolf P, Kissling W. Effects of a question prompt sheet on active patient behaviour: a randomized controlled trial with depressed outpatients. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2014; 60:227-35. [PMID: 23632272 DOI: 10.1177/0020764013482311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A deeper engagement into medical decision-making is demanded by treatment guidelines for patients with affective disorders. There is to date little evidence on what facilitates active behaviour of patients with depression. In general medicine 'question prompt sheets' (QPSs) have been shown to change patients' behaviour in the consultation and improve treatment satisfaction but there is no evidence for such interventions for mental health settings. AIMS To study the effects of a QPS on active patient behaviour in the consultation. METHODS Randomized controlled trial (involving N = 100 outpatients with depression) evaluating the effects of a QPS on patients' behaviour in the consultation. RESULTS The QPS showed no influence on the number of topics raised by patients (p = .13) nor on the external rater's perception of 'Who made the decisions in today's consultation?' (p = .50). CONCLUSIONS A QPS did not change depressed patients' behaviour in the consultation. More complex interventions might be needed to change depressed patients' behaviour within an established doctor-patient dyad. Patient seminars addressing behavioural aspects have been shown to be effective in other settings and may also be feasible for outpatients with affective disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hamann
- 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Can a decision aid enable informed decisions in neonatal nursery recruitment for a fragile X newborn screening study? Genet Med 2012; 15:299-306. [PMID: 23100013 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether a brochure based on principles of informed decision making improved attention to study materials or altered decisions made by parents invited to participate in a fragile X syndrome newborn screening study. METHODS A total of 1,323 families were invited to participate in a newborn screening study to identify infants with fragile X syndrome as well as premutation carrier infants. Of these families, 716 received the original project brochure and 607 were given a new decision aid brochure. RESULTS Families were more likely to look at the new decision aid and mothers were more likely to read it completely, but the proportion of mothers who read the entire decision aid was only 14%. Families were more likely to rate the decision aid as very helpful. Consistent with informed decision making theory and research, participants receiving the decision aid brochure were less likely to agree to participate. CONCLUSION The decision aid increased attention to and perceived helpfulness of educational information about the study, but most families did not read it completely. The study suggests that even well-designed study materials are not fully reviewed in the context of in-hospital postpartum study recruitment and may need to be accompanied by a research recruiter to obtain informed consent.
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Albada A, van Dulmen S, Bensing JM, Ausems MGEM. Effects of a pre-visit educational website on information recall and needs fulfilment in breast cancer genetic counselling, a randomized controlled trial. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14:R37. [PMID: 22394647 PMCID: PMC3446371 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2011] [Revised: 02/20/2012] [Accepted: 03/06/2012] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pre-visit education which helps counselees to prepare for their first visit for breast cancer genetic counseling might enhance information recall and needs fulfilment. This study assessed the effects of a pre-visit website with tailored information and question prompt sheet (QPS), named E-info geneca. Methods A total of 197 counselees were randomized to receive usual care (UC) or UC plus E-info geneca. All counselees completed a pre- and post-visit questionnaire and visits were videotaped. We studied effects on counselees' information recall, knowledge about breast cancer and heredity, fulfillment of needs, risk perception alignment, anxiety and perceived personal control, using multilevel regression analyses. Results Intent-to-treat analysis showed that counselees in the intervention group (n = 103) had higher levels of recall of information from the consultation (β = .32; confidence interval (CI): .04 to .60; P = .02; d = .17) and post-visit knowledge of breast cancer and heredity (β = .30; CI: .03 to .57; P = .03) than counselees in the UC group (n = 94). Also, intervention group counselees reported better fulfilment of information needs (β = .31; CI: .03 to .60; P = .03). The effects of the intervention were strongest for those counselees who did not receive an indication for DNA testing. Their recall scores showed a larger increase (β = .95; CI: .32 to 1.59; P = .003; d = .30) and their anxiety levels dropped more in the intervention compared to the UC group (β = -.60; CI: -1.12 to -.09; P = .02). No intervention effects were found after the first visit on risk perception alignment or perceived personal control. Conclusions This study shows that pre-counseling education, using tailored information technology, leads to more effective first visits for breast cancer genetic counseling, in particular for counselees who received no indication for DNA testing and, therefore, had no indication for a second visit. Future study should focus on the effects of a pre-visit website on the outcomes after a complete series of visits. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register ISRCTN82643064.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akke Albada
- NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118-124, Utrecht, 3500 BN, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|