1
|
Shimizu T, Shimizu Y. Interprofessional collaboration in the cardiovascular management of Marfan syndrome: A qualitative study based on interviews with professionals. J Vasc Nurs 2024; 42:18-25. [PMID: 38555174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvn.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Patients with Marfan syndrome, who present with a variety of symptoms and complex psychosocial problems, require interprofessional collaboration in their care. However, it is unclear how health care providers contribute to interprofessional collaboration for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of interprofessional collaboration for patients with Marfan syndrome in the cardiovascular field. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with health care specialists (5 physicians, 2 nurses, and 3 certified genetic counselors) were analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS Based on the medical collaboration for the management of cardiovascular complications in patients and their relatives, interprofessional collaboration was identified, such as collaboration and cooperation between physicians and certified genetic counselors, and nursing practice to facilitate interprofessional collaboration. In addition, issues such as difficulties in dealing with and coordinating medical care for noncardiovascular complications, lack of specialist physicians, and lack of opportunities to collaborate with nurses were identified. CONCLUSIONS Effective interprofessional collaboration requires the acquisition of Marfan syndrome and genetic knowledge by healthcare providers and the development of a healthcare delivery system based on departments that can provide leadership. In addition, the assignment of nurses to work across organizational boundaries and effective collaboration between genetic counselors and nurses should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoko Shimizu
- Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yasuko Shimizu
- Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Borle K, Kopac N, Dragojlovic N, Llorian ER, Lynd LD. Defining Need Amid Exponential Change: Conceptual Challenges in Workforce Planning for Clinical Genetic Services. Clin Ther 2023; 45:695-701. [PMID: 37516568 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Rapid growth in the volume of referrals to clinical genetics services in many countries during the past 15 years makes workforce planning a critical policy tool in ensuring that the capacity of the clinical genetics workforce is large enough to meet current and future needs. This article explores the distinctive challenges of workforce planning in clinical genetics and provides recommendations for addressing these challenges using a needs-based planning approach. Specifically, at least 3 features complicate efforts to estimate the need for clinical genetic services: the difficulty in linking many clinical genetic services to concrete health outcomes; the rapidly changing nature of genetic medicine, which creates intrinsic uncertainty about the appropriate level of service; and the heightened relevance of patient preferences in this context. Our recommendations call for needs-based planning studies to include an explicit definition of necessary care, to be flexible in considering nonhealth benefits, to err on the side of including services currently funded by health systems even when evidence about outcomes is limited, and to use scenario analysis and expert input to explore the impact of uncertainty about patients' preferences and future technologies on estimates of workforce requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kennedy Borle
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nicola Kopac
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisabet Rodriguez Llorian
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wicklund C, Sanghavi K, Coleman B, Johansen Taber K, Taylor JY, Asalone KC, Beachy S. Improving racial diversity in the genomics workforce: An examination of challenges and opportunities. Genet Med 2022; 24:1640-1643. [PMID: 35467533 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Wicklund
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Kunal Sanghavi
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT
| | - Bernice Coleman
- Geri and Richard Brawerman Nursing Institute and Nursing Research Department, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Jacquelyn Y Taylor
- Center for Research on People of Color, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
| | - Kathryn C Asalone
- Health and Medicine Division, The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC
| | - Sarah Beachy
- Health and Medicine Division, The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Snider AC, Isley LJ, Black LD. Scope of practice distinctions based on primary work setting for genetic counselors in assisted reproductive technologies. F S Rep 2021; 2:80-87. [PMID: 34223277 PMCID: PMC8244313 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2020.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To elucidate the tasks within various work settings that assisted reproductive technologies (ART) genetic counselors believe to be within their scope of practice. Design A survey was constructed and administered to genetic counselors who practice in the field of ART. Setting Genetic counselors were asked to self-identify with a primary ART work setting: genetic testing laboratory (preimplantation genetic testing, carrier screening, or both), in vitro fertilization clinic, gamete donor agency, telegenetic practice (either private practice or telemedicine company), or other. Patients N/A. Interventions N/A. Main Outcome Measures The number of years of practice in ART, tasks performed within various ART work settings representing the reality or the ideal, and perception of understanding of the scope of practice by nongenetics colleagues. Results The majority of respondents reported <10 years of experience in this field. There were differences in what was considered the scope of practice among the various work settings. ART genetic counselors believed that their scope of practice was not well understood by their nongenetics colleagues. They also reported differences between the actual duties performed and what they ideally believed would be within their job function. Conclusions The genetic counseling specialty of ART is a new work setting for genetic counselors. There is a need for education regarding the various roles of genetic counselors in ART. Better definition of the appropriate duties for genetic counselors in the various ART work settings is needed to foster effective working relationships with their nongenetics colleagues and optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lauri D Black
- Pacific Reproductive Genetic Counseling, Pacifica, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hyatt C, McDougall C, Miller-Samuel S, Russo J. Genetic Counseling for Men with Prostate Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2021; 48:323-337. [PMID: 34210488 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Germline genetic testing is becoming more prevalent in urology clinics because of precision medicine for prostate cancer treatment. Genetic testing results can also influence cancer screening discussions for patients and/or their families. An important part of germline genetic testing is genetic counseling. This article provides an overview of the historical aspects of genetic counseling, discusses the components needed to provide proper genetic counseling, summarizes genes related to hereditary prostate cancer risk, and reviews genetic privacy and genetic discrimination concerns related to germline genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colette Hyatt
- Familial Cancer Program, The University of Vermont Medical Center, Main Campus, East Pavilion, Level 2, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401, USA.
| | - Carey McDougall
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Clinical Cancer Genetics, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 602, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Susan Miller-Samuel
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Clinical Cancer Genetics, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 602, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| | - Jessica Russo
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Clinical Cancer Genetics, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 602, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bieth E, Nectoux J, Girardet A, Gruchy N, Mittre H, Laurans M, Guenet D, Brouard J, Gerard M. Genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis: A basic model with new challenges. Arch Pediatr 2020; 27 Suppl 1:eS30-eS34. [PMID: 32172934 DOI: 10.1016/s0929-693x(20)30048-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
While the goals of genetic counseling for cystic fibrosis - delivering relevant information on the risk of recurrence and nondirectional support of couples at risk in their reproductive choices - have not changed fundamentally, the practice has evolved considerably in the last decade, growing more complex to face new challenges but also proving more effective. Many factors have contributed to this evolution: technical progress in the exploration of the genome (new generation sequencing) and in reproductive medicine, but also societal developments promoting access to genetic information and the professionalization of genetic counselors in France. The prospect of expanded pre-conception screening of at-risk couples makes genetic counselors major actors not only in medical care centers, but also in modern society by contributing to genetic education among citizens. © 2020 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Bieth
- Génétique Médicale, CHU Toulouse, France.
| | - J Nectoux
- Service de génétique et biologie moléculaires, CHU Paris Centre - Hôpital Cochin, Site Cochin, Paris, France
| | - A Girardet
- Génétique Moléculaire, CHU Montpellier, France
| | - N Gruchy
- Génétique Médicale, CHR Clemenceau, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| | - H Mittre
- Génétique Médicale, CHR Clemenceau, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| | - M Laurans
- CRCM, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| | - D Guenet
- Laboratoire de Biochimie, Dépistage néonatal, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| | - J Brouard
- Pédiatrie, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| | - M Gerard
- Génétique Médicale, CHR Clemenceau, CHU de Caen, Avenue Côte de Nacre, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hernan R, Cho MT, Wilson AL, Ahimaz P, Au C, Berger SM, Guzman E, Primiano M, Shaw JE, Ross M, Tabanfar L, Chilton I, Griffin E, Ratner C, Anyane-Yeboa K, Iglesias A, Pisani L, Roohi J, Duong J, Martinez J, Appelbaum P, Klitzman R, Ottman R, Chung WK, Wynn J. Impact of patient education videos on genetic counseling outcomes after exome sequencing. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:127-135. [PMID: 31521424 PMCID: PMC9667716 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 08/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Growing use of clinical exome sequencing (CES) has led to an increased burden of genomic education. Self-guided educational tools can minimize the educational burden for genetic counselors (GCs). The effectiveness of these tools must be evaluated. METHODS Parents of patients offered CES were randomized to watch educational videos before their visit or to receive routine care. Parents and GCs were surveyed about their experiences following the sessions. The responses of the video (n = 102) and no-video (n = 105) groups were compared. RESULTS GCs reported no significant differences between parents in the video and no-video groups on genetics knowledge or CES knowledge. In contrast, parents' scores on genetics knowledge questions were lower in the video than no-video group (p = 0.007). Most parents reported the videos were informative, and the groups did not differ in satisfaction with GCs or decisions to have CES. CONCLUSION GCs and parents perceived the videos to be beneficial. However, lower scores on genetics knowledge questions highlight the need for careful development of educational tools. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Educational tools should be developed and assessed for effectiveness with the input of all stakeholders before widespread implementation. Better measures of the effectiveness of these educational tools are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Hernan
- Sarah Lawrence College, Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Bronxville, NY, USA; Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Megan T Cho
- Sarah Lawrence College, Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Bronxville, NY, USA; GeneDx, 207 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Ashley L Wilson
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Priyanka Ahimaz
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Catherine Au
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara M Berger
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edwin Guzman
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Primiano
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jessica E Shaw
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith Ross
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leyla Tabanfar
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ilana Chilton
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Emily Griffin
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chana Ratner
- Long Island University, LIU Post Genetic Counseling Graduate Program, Brookville, NY, USA
| | - Kwame Anyane-Yeboa
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alejandro Iglesias
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Pisani
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jasmin Roohi
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jimmy Duong
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Josue Martinez
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Appelbaum
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert Klitzman
- G.H. Sergievsky Center and Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ruth Ottman
- G.H. Sergievsky Center and Departments of Epidemiology and Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, and NY State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julia Wynn
- Division of Clinical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Puski A, Hovick S, Senter L, Toland AE. Involvement and Influence of Healthcare Providers, Family Members, and Other Mutation Carriers in the Cancer Risk Management Decision-Making Process of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:1291-1301. [PMID: 29594659 PMCID: PMC6612901 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Deciding between increased cancer screening or prophylactic surgery and the timing of such procedures can be a difficult and complex process for women with BRCA mutations. There are gaps in our understanding of involvement of others in the decision-making process for women with BRCA mutations. This study evaluated the management decision-making process of women with BRCA mutations, focusing on the involvement of others. Grounded theory was used to analyze and code risk management decision-making information from interviews with 20 BRCA mutation carriers. Unaffected at-risk participants with a BRCA mutation, those under age 40, and those with no children described having a difficult time making risk management decisions. Physicians were an integral part of the decision-making process by providing decisional support and management recommendations. Family members and other mutation carriers filled similar yet distinct roles by providing experiential information as well as decisional and emotional support for carriers. Participants described genetic counselors as short-term providers of risk information and management recommendations. The study findings suggest that unaffected at-risk women, women under 40, and those who do not have children may benefit from additional support and information during the decision-making process. Genetic counselors are well trained to help women through this process and connect them with resources, and may be under-utilized in long-term follow-up for women with a BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Puski
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
- Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 21602 PFP, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| | - Shelly Hovick
- School of Communication, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda Ewart Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lucas AL, Tarlecki A, Van Beck K, Lipton C, RoyChoudhury A, Levinson E, Kumar S, Chung WK, Frucht H, Genkinger JM. Self-Reported Questionnaire Detects Family History of Cancer in a Pancreatic Cancer Screening Program. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:806-813. [PMID: 28039657 PMCID: PMC5498249 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0057-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer death; approximately 5-10% of PDAC is hereditary. Self-administered health history questionnaires (HHQs) may provide a low-cost method to detail family history (FH) of malignancy. Pancreas Center patients were asked to enroll in a registry; 149 with PDAC completed a HHQ which included FH data. Patients with FH of PDAC, or concern for inherited PDAC syndrome, were separately evaluated in a Prevention Program and additionally met with a genetic counselor (GC) to assess PDAC risk (n = 61). FH obtained through GC and HHQ were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank sum and generalized linear mixed models with Poisson distribution. Agreement between GC and HHQ risk-assessment was assessed using kappa (κ) statistic. In the Prevention Program, HHQ was as precise in detecting FH of cancer as the GC (all p > 0.05). GC and HHQ demonstrated substantial agreement in risk-stratification of the Prevention Program cohort (κ = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.87.) The sensitivity of the HHQ to detect a patient at elevated risk (i.e., moderate- or high-risk) of PDAC, compared to GC, was 82.9% (95% CI 67.3-92.3%) with a specificity of 95% (95% CI 73.1-99.7%). However, seven patients who were classified as average-risk by the HHQ were found to be at an elevated-risk of PDAC by the GC. In the PDAC cohort, 30/149 (20.1%) reported at least one first-degree relative (FDR) with PDAC. The limited sensitivity of the HHQ to detect patients at elevated risk of PDAC in the Prevention Program cohort suggests that a GC adds value in risk-assessment in this population. The HHQ may offer an opportunity to identify high-risk patients in a PDAC population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimee L Lucas
- Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, Samuel Bronfman Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1069, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
| | - Adam Tarlecki
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Kellie Van Beck
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Casey Lipton
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Arindam RoyChoudhury
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Elana Levinson
- Cancer Genetics Program, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Sheila Kumar
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Harold Frucht
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jeanine M Genkinger
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laurino MY, Sternen DL, Thompson JK, Leppig KA. Identifying opportunities for collaboration and growth of genetic counseling services in the Asia Region. J Community Genet 2017; 8:243-8. [PMID: 28547653 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0307-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2016] [Accepted: 05/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The Genetic Counseling Pre-Conference Workshop (GCPCW) was held on September 16, 2015, in Hanoi, Vietnam. We report the GCPCW outcomes obtained from pre- and post-conference questionnaires, case-review breakout session, and an open discussion of needs for genetic counseling services in the Asia region. The GCPCW participants completed questionnaires with closed- and open-ended questions regarding the status and needs of providing genetic counseling services in Asia. Utilizing thematic content analysis, common themes shared during the case-review breakout session are summarized and survey results are tabulated. Of the 71 participants, pre- and post-conference questionnaires were returned by 57 (80%) and 44 (62%) individuals, respectively. Of the 42 participants who did not identify themselves as students in training, 36 (86%) stated they are currently providing genetic counseling services. Participants cited that the most useful information obtained during the GCPCW related to the status of genetic counseling services in the region, discovery of shared challenges, professional networking, and the need to establish genetic counseling training programs and its accreditation. The GCPCW provided a collaborative forum to address current challenges and needs of genetic counseling services in the region. Strategies were identified to foster genetic counseling training and clinical service opportunities.
Collapse
|
11
|
Reeder R, Veach PM, MacFarlane IM, LeRoy BS. Characterizing Clinical Genetic Counselors' Countertransference Experiences: an Exploratory Study. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:934-947. [PMID: 28074313 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0063-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Countertransference (CT) refers to conscious and unconscious emotions, fantasies, behaviors, perceptions, and psychological defenses genetic counselors experience in response to any aspect of genetic counseling situations (Weil 2010). Some authors theorize about the importance of recognizing and managing CT, but no studies solely aim to explore genetic counselors' experiences of the phenomenon. This study examined the extent to which clinical genetic counselors' perceive themselves as inclined to experience CT, gathered examples of CT encountered in clinical situations, and assessed their CT management strategies. An anonymous online survey, sent to NSGC members, yielded 127 usable responses. Participants completed Likert-type items rating their CT propensities; 57 of these individuals also provided examples of CT they experienced in their practice. Factor analysis of CT propensities tentatively suggested four factors: Control, Conflict Avoidance, Directiveness, and Self-Regulation, accounting for 38.5% of response variance. Thematic analysis of CT examples yielded five common triggers: general similarity to patient, medical/genetic similarity, angry patients, patient behaves differently from counselor expectations, and disclosing bad news; six common manifestations: being self-focused, projecting feelings onto the patient, intense emotional reaction to patient, being overly invested, disengagement, and physical reaction; five CT effects: disruption in rapport building, repaired empathy, over-identification, conversation does not reach fullest potential, and counselor is drained emotionally; and three management strategies: recognizing CT as it occurs, self-reflection, and consultation. Results suggest CT is a common experience, occurring in both "routine" and emotionally complex cases. Training programs, continuing education, and peer supervision might include discussion of CT, informed by examples from the present study, to increase genetic counselor awareness and skills for managing the phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Reeder
- Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, OhioHealth, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Patricia McCarthy Veach
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
| | | | - Bonnie S LeRoy
- Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pirzadeh-Miller S, Robinson LS, Read P, Ross TS. Genetic Counseling Assistants: an Integral Piece of the Evolving Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Model. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:716-27. [PMID: 27832509 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0039-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/17/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the potential impact of the genetic counseling assistant (GCA) position on the efficiency of the genetic counseling field, evaluates attitudes regarding expansion of the genetic counseling field to include the GCA, and presents data on GCA endeavors and GCA job tasks as reported by GCAs, certified genetic counselors (CGCs), and program directors (PDs). Data on GCA roles and attitudes toward different aspects of the GCA position were collected via surveys of CGCs who have worked with GCAs, PDs who have and have not had experience with GCAs in their programs, and GCAs. We analyzed responses from 63 individuals: 27 PDs, 22 CGCs, and 14 GCAs. GCAs' impact on efficiency was calculated via internal analysis of genetic patient volume per genetic counselor within the University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) patient database prior to, and since the addition of, a GCA to the practice. The response rates for PDs, CGCs, and GCAs were 27 %, 79 %, and 61 %, respectively. Every CGC stated the GCA increased their efficiency. CGCs with a GCA reported a 60 % average increase in patient volume. This figure was congruent with internal data from the UTSW cancer genetics program (58.5 % increase). Appropriate responsibilities for GCAs as reported by CGCs and PDs (>90 %) include: data entry, shipping tests, administrative tasks, research, and ordering supplies. Regarding GCAs delivering test results, there was response variation whether this should be a job duty: 42 % of CGCs agreed to GCAs delivering negative results to patients, compared to 22 % of program directors. Twenty-two percent of PDs expressed concern about the job title "Genetic Counseling Assistant." Ninety percent of CGCs felt that GCA was a career path to becoming a CGC, compared to 42 % of PDs. Eighty-three percent of GCAs who decided to apply to CGC graduate programs were accepted. We conclude the addition of a GCA to a genetic counseling practice contributes to increased efficiency and is one way to expand the reach of the profession.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hippman C, Davis C. Put Yourself at the Helm: Charting New Territory, Correcting Course, and Weathering the Storm of Career Trajectories. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:720-30. [PMID: 26920006 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9936-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
What bearing have you set you set your sights on? How do you navigate the ever-changing swells and winds of our professional landscape? Are you feeling a nebulous desire for change, that your career is not going in the direction you were expecting, worry about lack of future opportunities, or even a deep dissatisfaction in your current position? You are not alone. The formation of the Committee on Advanced Training for Certified Genetic Counselors (CATCGC) was partly in response to such sentiments, expressed within a vibrant dialogue amongst members of the genetic counseling community. The CATCGC sought to understand how genetic counselors chart courses for their careers by conducting a Decision Points exercise during a pre-conference symposium (PCS) at the 2014 NSGC Annual Education Conference. Participants were asked to identify a decision point at which they were most satisfied with their careers and one at which they were least satisfied and to describe the situation, their personal goals and intentions, any actions they took, and the outcomes. Qualitative analysis in the constructivist tradition was conducted on participants' responses and facilitators' notes from the PCS to explore what personal meanings were made of the decision points; twelve themes related to Career High Points, Low Points, and how genetic counselors made career transitions were identified. Using a constructivist framework, themes are presented in the context of the authors' personal experiences, and the authors' share their reflections on these data. We wrote this article to offer you a window into your peers' experiences - the good, the bad, and the ugly - hoping to encourage and challenge you to reflect deeply, no matter where you are on your career journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona Hippman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- BC Mental Health & Addictions Research Institute, CFRI Translational Research Building, 3rd Floor - 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada.
| | - Claire Davis
- Adult Education Guided Intensive Study Program, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
- Joan H. Marks Graduate Program in Human Genetics, Sarah Lawrence College, 1 Mead Way, Bronxville, NY, 10708, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Murphy C, Lincoln S, Meredith S, Cross EM, Rintell D. Sex Education and Intellectual Disability: Practices and Insight from Pediatric Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:552-60. [PMID: 26581379 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9909-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Intellectual disability (ID) with or without other anomalies is a common referral for genetic counseling. Sessions may include discussions of reproductive implications and other issues related to sex education. Patients with ID regularly meet barriers when trying to obtain sex education due to the misperceptions of others as being either asexual or that such education would promote inappropriate sexual behavior. In this pilot study, we surveyed genetic counselors to explore their experiences with being asked to provide sex education counseling and their comfort in doing so for patients with ID ages 9-17. Results were analyzed from 38 respondents. Caregivers and patients most frequently requested information on puberty, sex abuse prevention, and reproductive health. Genetic counselors were most comfortable when they could provide sex education counseling within the context of a particular condition or constellation of features. They were least comfortable when they lacked familiarity with the patient, caregiver, or the family's culture. The most frequently cited barriers that prevented genetic counselors from providing sex education counseling were lack of time, lack of training, the patient's ID being too profound, and a belief that genetic counselors should not be responsible for providing sex education counseling. While many respondents reported that providing sex education counseling is not considered within the scope of a genetic counselor's practice, they also noted that patients' families initiate discussions for which counselors should be prepared. Respondents indicated that resource guides specifically designed for use by genetic counselors would be beneficial to their practice. Genetic counselors have the opportunity to embrace the role of advocate and broach the issue of sexual health with caregivers and patients by directing them toward educational resources, if not providing sex education directly to effectively serve the needs of patients and caregivers.
Collapse
|
15
|
Wells DM, McCarthy Veach P, Martyr MA, LeRoy BS. Development, Experience, and Expression of Meaning in Genetic Counselors' Lives: an Exploratory Analysis. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:799-817. [PMID: 26498971 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9901-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Genetic counselors routinely engage with patients and families who grapple with questions of meaning while making decisions about genetic risk. Research and theory demonstrate genetic counselors gain important personal insights through their work and develop professionally from self-reflective practice regarding their beliefs and values. Data are lacking, however, about the nature of the meaning genetic counselors bring to their profession and how they directly experience and/or navigate issues of meaning within clinical practice over time. Accordingly, a national sample (N = 298) of practicing genetic counselors completed a brief survey assessing their demographic characteristics and willingness to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview exploring their views on meaning as they relate to their clinical work and professional development. Sixty-eight individuals of varied experience levels were interviewed about: 1) how they define a meaningful life for themselves; 2) lifetime sources of influence on their sense of meaning; 3) how they experience meaning within both personal and professional contexts; 4) work-related contexts that reaffirm and challenge their sense of meaning; and 5) how their sense of meaning has changed over time. Twenty-five interviews were analyzed using Consensual Qualitative Research methods, at which point, data saturation was reached. Five themes, 32 domains, and 29 categories were extracted. Common findings include: importance of satisfying relationships; helping others; personal fulfillment; personal and patient experiences of illness and loss; religious and/or spiritual foundations; value conflicts; competing obligations; challenges to meaning; development of empathy; resiliency; and increased humility. Results suggest the importance of professional venues for discussions of meaning (e.g., genetic counseling program curricula, continuing education, and peer supervision/consultation). Additional findings, practice implications, and research recommendations are presented.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lazarin GA, Detweiler S, Nazareth SB, Ashkinadze E. Genetic Counselors' Perspectives and Practices Regarding Expanded Carrier Screening after Initial Clinical Availability. J Genet Couns 2015; 25:395-404. [PMID: 26354338 PMCID: PMC4799270 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9881-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS), introduced in 2009, identifies carriers for dozens or hundreds of recessive diseases. At the time of its introduction into clinical use, perspectives of the genetic counseling community regarding ECS were unknown. We conducted a survey in early 2012 of GCs and report the results here. They represent a snapshot of opinions and usage at that time, providing a baseline for comparison as the technology continues to evolve and as usage increases. The survey assessed personal perspectives, opinions on clinical implementation and clinical utilization of ECS. The sample included 337 GCs of varying clinical fields, of whom 150 reported practicing in reproductive settings. Our findings demonstrate that, at the time, GCs indicated general agreement with ECS as a concept - for example, most GCs agreed that carrier screening should address diseases outside of current guidelines and also indicated personal interest in electing ECS. There were also disagreements or concerns expressed regarding appropriate pre- and post-test counseling (e.g., the content and delivery mode of adequate informed consent) and practical implementation (e.g., the amount of time available for follow-up care). This was the first quantitative study of a large number of GCs and it revealed initial overall support for ECS among the GC profession. The authors plan to re-administer a similar survey, which may reveal changes in opinions and/or utilization over time. A follow up survey would also allow further exploration of questions uncovered by these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stacey Detweiler
- Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | - Elena Ashkinadze
- Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|