Standing orthostatic blood pressure measurements cannot be replaced by sitting measurements

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥ 20 mmHg when going from supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" for when this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and identification of patients who are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypertension endorsed by the American Autonomic Society and the Japanese Society of Hypertension

We propose a consensus definition of "an exaggerated orthostatic pressor response" in subjects in whom systolic blood pressure increases ≥20 mmHg when going from the supine to standing posture. This definition can be extended for seated to standing measurements. We reserve the term "orthostatic hypertension" if this pressor response leads to an upright systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg. We believe this consensus definition will help in the study of the pathophysiology, clinical impact, and potential treatment of these entities, and the identification of patients that are at greater cardiovascular risk.

Sources of automatic office blood pressure measurement error: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Accurate and reliable blood pressure (BP) measurement is important for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. The oscillometric-based automatic office blood pressure measurement (AOBPM) is widely used in hospitals and clinics, but measurement errors are common in BP measurements. There is a lack of systematic review of the sources of measurement errors.

APPROACH

A systematic review of all existing research on sources of AOBPM errors. A search strategy was designed in six online databases, and all the literature published before October 2021 was selected. Those studies that used the AOBPM device to measure BP from the upper arm of subjects were included.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 1365 studies were screened, and 224 studies were included in this final review. They investigated 22 common error sources with clinical AOBPM. Regarding the causes of BP errors, this review divided them into the following categories: the activities before measurement, patient's factors, measurement environment, measurement procedure, and device settings. 13 sources caused increased systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP), 2 sources caused the decrease in SBP and DBP, only 1 source had no significant effect on BPs, and the other errors had a non-uniform effect (either increase or decrease in BPs). The error ranges for SBP and DBP were -14 to 33 mmHg and -6 to 19 mmHg, respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The measurement accuracy of AOBPM is susceptible to the influence of measurement factors. Interpreting BP readings need to be treated with caution in clinical measurements. This review made comprehensive evidence for the need for standardized BP measurements and provided guidance for clinical practitioners when measuring BP with AOBPM devices.

Comparison of the sit-up test and head-up tilt test for assessing blood pressure and hemodynamic responses in healthy young individuals

OBJECTIVE

The sit-up test is used to assess orthostatic hypotension, without the use of a tilt table, in populations who are unable to stand. The primary objective of this study was to determine the differences in blood pressure and hemodynamic responses between the sit-up and head-up tilt tests. The secondary objective was to determine the hemodynamic responses related to changes in blood pressure during each test.

METHODS

Nineteen healthy volunteers (nine males, aged 24.3 ± 2.4 years) underwent the sit-up and head-up tilt tests. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were measured.

RESULTS

The increase in systolic blood pressure (15 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 8 mmHg) was greater, while the increase in heart rate (8 ± 5 vs. 12 ± 8 bpm) and reduction in stroke volume (-17 ± 10 vs. -21 ± 10 ml) were smaller during the sit-up test than during the head-up tilt test (P < 0.05). Additionally, the increases in blood pressure variables were significantly associated with the increase in total peripheral resistance (P < 0.05), but not with changes in other hemodynamic variables in both tests.

CONCLUSION

Although the magnitudes of changes in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and stroke volume differed between the tests, the hemodynamic variable related to changes in blood pressure was the same for both tests. These results may contribute to the clinical application of the sit-up test for identifying the presence and hemodynamic mechanisms of orthostatic hypotension.

Comparison of the Active Sitting Test and Head-Up Tilt Test for Diagnosis of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome in Children and Adolescents

Objectives: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic responses to the active sitting test with the passive head-up tilt test (HUTT) in children and adolescents with postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). We hypothesized that sitting tachycardia was also present in POTS patients during sitting. Materials and methods: We tested 30 POTS patients and 31 control subjects (mean age = 12 years, range = 9-16 years) who underwent both active sitting test and HUTT successively. We measured the heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) during each test. Results: For both POTS patients and control subjects, the HUTT produced significantly larger HR and BP increases from 3 to 10 min of postural change than did the sitting test. Moreover, POTS patients with excessive orthostatic tachycardia during the HUTT also had significantly larger increases in HR at all test intervals during the sitting test than did the control subjects. A maximum increase in HR ≥ 22 bpm within 10 min of the sitting test was likely suggested to predict orthostatic tachycardia, yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 83.3 and 83.9%, respectively. Only six of 30 POTS patients (20%) reached the 40-bpm criterion during the sitting test, and no one complained of sitting intolerance symptoms. Conclusions: We have shown that POTS patients also have sitting tachycardia when changing from a supine position to a sitting position. We believe that the active sitting test is a reasonable alternative maneuver in assessing POTS in population groups that cannot tolerate the standing test or HUTT.

Prevalence of initial orthostatic hypotension in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Initial orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a clinical syndrome of exaggerated transient orthostasis associated with higher risks of falls, frailty and syncope in older adults.

Objective

To provide a prevalence estimate of initial OH in adults aged 65 years or older.

Methods

Literature search of MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1947) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed until 6 December 2019, using the terms ‘initial orthostatic hypotension’, ‘postural hypotension’ and ‘older adults’. Articles were included if published in English and participants were 65 years or older. Random effects models were used for pooled analysis.

Results

Of 5,136 articles screened, 13 articles (10 cross-sectional; 3 longitudinal) reporting data of 5,465 individuals (54.5% female) from the general (n = 4,157), geriatric outpatient (n = 1,136), institutionalised (n = 55) and mixed (n = 117) population were included. Blood pressure was measured continuously and intermittently in 11 and 2 studies, respectively. Pooled prevalence of continuously measured initial OH was 29.0% (95% CI: 22.1–36.9%, I² = 94.6%); 27.8% in the general population (95% CI: 17.9–40.5%, I² = 96.1%), 35.2% in geriatric outpatients (95% CI: 24.2–48.1%, I² = 95.3%), 10.0% in institutionalised individuals (95% CI: 2.4–33.1%, I² = 0%) and 21.4% in the mixed population (95% CI: 7.0–49.6, I² = 0%). Pooled prevalence of intermittently measured initial OH was 5.6% (95% CI: 1.5–18.9%, I² = 81.1%); 1.0% in the general population (95% CI: 0.0–23.9%, I² = 0%) and 7.7% in geriatric outpatients (95% CI: 1.8–27.0%, I² = 86.7%).

Conclusion

The prevalence of initial OH is high in older adults, especially in geriatric outpatients. Proper assessment of initial OH requires continuous blood pressure measurements.

Orthostatic hypotension assessed by active standing is associated with worse cognition in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients, RESORT

PURPOSE

Geriatric rehabilitation inpatients who suffer from acute and chronic diseases that aggravate blood pressure (BP) dysregulation, may be particularly susceptible to orthostatic hypotension (OH). OH may increase the risk of cerebral small vessel disease and subsequent white matter hyperintensities inducing cognitive impairment (CI). This study investigates the association between OH and cognition in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Geriatric rehabilitation inpatients of the observational, longitudinal REStORing health of acutely unwell adulTs (RESORT) cohort in Melbourne, Australia, underwent intermittent BP measurements during active standing or partial postural change to sitting (when unable to stand). OH was defined as a systolic BP drop ≥20 mmHg and/or diastolic BP drop ≥10 mmHg within three minutes after postural change. CI included dementia diagnosis, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score <24 points (categorized as 18-23 (mild CI) and <18 points (severe CI)), Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <26 points or Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale score <23 points.

RESULTS

In geriatric rehabilitation inpatients (n=1232, mean age 82.3 years (SD 8.2), 57.5% female), OH, CI and dementia prevalence was 20.0%, 61.0% and 20.4% respectively. MMSE was scored 18-23 in 32.6% and <18 points in 27.8% of patients (n=1033). In standing patients (51.7%), OH was associated with CI (p=0.045) and dementia (p=0.021), with a trend for MMSE scores <18 points (p=0.080), but not for MMSE scores 18-23 points (p=0.528). No association was found between seated OH and cognition.

CONCLUSION

OH assessed by active standing using intermittent BP measurements was associated with worse cognition in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients.

Initial orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic intolerance symptom prevalence in older adults: A systematic review

Background

Initial orthostatic hypotension is a clinically relevant syndrome in older adults which has been associated with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of orthostatic intolerance symptoms in older adults with initial orthostatic hypotension.

Methods

MEDLINE (from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974) and Cochrane were searched to December 6th^, 2019 using the terms "initial orthostatic hypotension", "postural hypotension" and "older adults". Study selection involved the following criteria: published in English; mean or median age ≥ 65 years and diagnosis of initial orthostatic hypotension encompassed a decrease in systolic blood pressure by ≥ 40  mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure by ≥ 20  mmHg within a maximum of 1 min following a postural change.

Results

Of 8311 articles, 12 articles reporting initial orthostatic hypotension prevalence in 3446 participants with a mean age of 75 (6 SD) years (56.5% female) were included. Five initial orthostatic hypotension definition variations were utilised and symptoms were reported in six articles (968 participants, mean age 73.4 (6.1 SD) years, 56% female). The prevalence of symptoms in older adults with initial orthostatic hypotension ranged from 24 to 100% and was dependent on variations in timing or the inclusion of symptoms in the initial orthostatic hypotension definition.

Conclusions

Where orthostatic intolerance symptoms were reported, a large proportion of older adults with a diagnosis of initial orthostatic hypotension were symptomatic. However, the literature on initial orthostatic hypotension and orthostatic intolerance symptoms is scarce and a variety of definitions of initial orthostatic hypotension are utilised.

Bisoprolol transdermal patch improves orthostatic hypotension in patients with chronic heart failure and hypertension

β blockers (BBs) play an important role in heart failure (HF) treatment. However, orthostatic hypotension (OH) is sometimes caused by BBs. The bisoprolol transdermal patch works more slowly and is long acting compared with the bisoprolol fumarate tablet. The risk of OH may be reduced by using the bisoprolol transdermal patch. We evaluated 57 consecutive patients who were taking the bisoprolol fumarate tablet for chronic HF with hypertension from November 2016 to September 2017. We switched the patients to the bisoprolol transdermal patch. Because 12 of 57 subjects could not continue using the bisoprolol transdermal patch, we analyzed the remaining 45 patients. We investigated BP, blood tests, and changes in BP from supine to standing positions before and after 6 months of switching from tablet to patch. OH was diagnosed by observing a systolic/diastolic BP drop of at least 20/10 mmHg or an absolute systolic BP (sBP) of <90 mmHg from the standing position. No significant changes were observed in the BP and BPs from supine to standing positions, whereas log brain natriuretic peptide was significantly reduced after switching from patch to tablet (2.102 to 2.070pg/dl, P = .039). OH, which occurred in originally 17 patients, showed improvement and eventually appeared in 4 patients. In these patients, changes in BP from supine to standing positions were also significantly improved (changes in sBP, -11 to -6mmHg, P = .016). This study demonstrated that switching from the bisoprolol fumarate tablet to transdermal patch reduced the morbidity of OH in HF patients.

Detection of orthostatic hypotension with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in parkinson's disease

We sought to test the accuracy of 24-hours ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) for the detection of orthostatic hypotension (OH) in Parkinson's disease (PD). A total of 113 patients referred for autonomic testing between January 2015 and June 2017 underwent ABPM and office BP measurements in supine and standing positions. The study population consisted of 81 males and 32 females with PD duration of 6.5 ± 4.1 years and Hoehn and Yahr staging of 1 (13.3%), 1.5 (20.4%), 2 (27.4%), 2.5 (23.9%), 3 (13.3%), and 4 (1.8%). Motor fluctuations were present in 44% of patients. The data from office BP recordings were compared to selected ABPM parameters, and the results showed an association between OH and (a) ABPM-detected hypotensive episodes (Hypo-ep) and (b) ABPM-detected awakening hypotension (Hypo-aw). Having 2 or more Hypo-ep episodes ≤15 mmHg (systolic) compared to average 24-h systolic BP [Formula: see text] yielded 75% diagnostic accuracy for OH, while the presence of at least one [Formula: see text] within 90 min after getting up [Formula: see text] yielded 93% specificity for OH. A diagnostic accuracy of 87.6% was achieved when including daytime and nighttime ABPM values, weighted BP variability, systolic and diastolic BP loads, nocturnal dipping, and postprandial hypotension in a computerized prediction algorithm. In conclusion, our findings suggest that selected ABPM parameters, such as the number of hypotensive episodes and the presence of awakening hypotension, may be used to screen patients for OH, while using a computerized prediction algorithm that includes all ABPM parameters provides the greatest diagnostic accuracy.