1
|
Tighe MP, Andrews E, Liddicoat I, Afzal NA, Hayen A, Beattie RM. Pharmacological treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 8:CD008550. [PMID: 37635269 PMCID: PMC10443045 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008550.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is characterised by the regurgitation of gastric contents into the oesophagus. GOR is a common presentation in infancy, both in primary and secondary care, affecting approximately 50% of infants under three months old. The natural history of GOR in infancy is generally of a self-limiting condition that improves with age, but older children and children with co-existing medical conditions can have more protracted symptoms. The distinction between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and GOR is debated. Current National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines define GORD as GOR causing symptoms severe enough to merit treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2014. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of pharmacological treatments for GOR in infants and children. SEARCH METHODS For this update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science up to 17 September 2022. We also searched for ongoing trials in clinical trials registries, contacted experts in the field, and searched the reference lists of trials and reviews for any additional trials. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared any currently-available pharmacological treatment for GOR in children with placebo or another medication. We excluded studies assessing dietary management of GORD and studies of thickened feeds. We included studies in infants and children up to 16 years old. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodology expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS We included 36 RCTs involving 2251 children and infants. We were able to extract summary data from 14 RCTs; the remaining trials had insufficient data for extraction. We were unable to pool results in a meta-analysis due to methodological differences in the included studies (including heterogeneous outcomes, study populations, and study design). We present the results in two groups by age: infants up to 12 months old, and children aged 12 months to 16 years old. Infants Omeprazole versus placebo: there is no clear effect on symptoms from omeprazole. One study (30 infants; very low-certainty evidence) showed cry/fuss time in infants aged three to 12 months had altered from 246 ± 105 minutes/day at baseline (mean +/- standard deviation (SD)) to 191 ± 120 minutes/day in the omeprazole group and from 287 ± 132 minutes/day to 201 ± 100 minutes/day in the placebo group (mean difference (MD) 10 minutes/day lower (95% confidence interval (CI) -89.1 to 69.1)). The reflux index changed in the omeprazole group from 9.9 ± 5.8% in 24 hours to 1.0 ± 1.3% and in the placebo group from 7.2 ± 6.0% to 5.3 ± 4.9% in 24 hours (MD 7% lower, 95% CI -4.7 to -9.3). Omeprazole versus ranitidine: one study (76 infants; very low-certainty evidence) showed omeprazole may or may not provide symptomatic benefit equivalent to ranitidine. Symptom scores in the omeprazole group changed from 51.9 ± 5.4 to 2.4 ± 1.2, and in the ranitidine group from 47 ± 5.6 to 2.5 ± 0.6 after two weeks: MD -4.97 (95% CI -7.33 to -2.61). Esomeprazole versus placebo: esomeprazole appeared to show no additional reduction in the number of GORD symptoms compared to placebo (1 study, 52 neonates; very low-certainty evidence): both the esomeprazole group (184.7 ± 78.5 to 156.7 ± 75.1) and placebo group (183.1 ± 77.5 to 158.3 ± 75.9) improved: MD -3.2 (95% CI -4.6 to -1.8). Children Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at different doses may provide little to no symptomatic and endoscopic benefit. Rabeprazole given at different doses (0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg) may provide similar symptom improvement (127 children in total; very low-certainty evidence). In the lower-dose group (0.5 mg/kg), symptom scores improved in both a low-weight group of children (< 15 kg) (mean -10.6 ± SD 11.13) and a high-weight group of children (> 15 kg) (mean -13.6 ± 13.1). In the higher-dose groups (1 mg/kg), scores improved in the low-weight (-9 ± 11.2) and higher-weight groups (-8.3 ± 9.2). For the higher-weight group, symptom score mean difference between the two different dosing regimens was 2.3 (95% CI -2 to 6.6), and for the lower-weight group, symptom score MD was 4.6 (95% CI -2.9 to 12). Pantoprazole: pantoprazole may or may not improve symptom scores at 0.3 mg/kg, 0.6 mg/kg, and 1.2 mg/kg pantoprazole in children aged one to five years by week eight, with no difference between 0.3 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg dosing (0.3 mg/kg mean -2.4 ± 1.7; 1.2 mg/kg -1.7 ± 1.2: MD 0.7 (95% CI -0.4 to 1.8)) (one study, 60 children; very low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient summary data to assess other medications. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is very low-certainty evidence about symptom improvements and changes in pH indices for infants. There are no summary data for endoscopic changes. Medications may or may not provide a benefit (based on very low-certainty evidence) for infants whose symptoms remain bothersome, despite nonmedical interventions or parental reassurance. If a medication is required, there is no clear evidence based on summary data for omeprazole, esomeprazole (in neonates), H₂antagonists, and alginates for symptom improvements (very low-certainty evidence). Further studies with longer follow-up are needed. In older children with GORD, in studies with summary data extracted, there is very low-certainty evidence that PPIs (rabeprazole and pantoprazole) may or may not improve GORD outcomes. No robust data exist for other medications. Further RCT evidence is required in all areas, including subgroups (preterm babies and children with neurodisabilities).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark P Tighe
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
| | - Edward Andrews
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
| | - Iona Liddicoat
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, UK
| | - Nadeem A Afzal
- Faculty of Science & Health, Portsmouth University, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Andrew Hayen
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Mark Beattie
- Child Health, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Puoti MG, Assa A, Benninga M, Broekaert IJ, Carpi FJM, Deganello Saccomani M, Dolinsek J, Homan M, Mas E, Miele E, Tzivinikos C, Thomson M, Borrelli O. Drugs in Focus: Domperidone. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2023; 77:e13-e22. [PMID: 37159421 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Domperidone is a peripheral dopamine-2 receptor antagonist with prokinetic and antiemetic properties. Its prokinetic effects are mainly manifest in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Currently its use is restricted to relief of nausea and vomiting in children older than 12 years for a short period of time. However, among (pediatric) gastroenterologists, domperidone is also used outside its authorized indication ("off label") for treatment of symptoms associated with gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dyspepsia, and gastroparesis. Little is known about its efficacy in the treatment of GI motility disorders in children and controversial data have emerged in the pediatric literature. As its use is off label, appropriate knowledge of its efficacy is helpful to support an "off label/on evidence" prescription. Based on this, the purpose of this review is to summarize all evidence on the efficacy of domperidone for the treatment of GI disorders in infants and children and to report an overview of its pharmacological properties and safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Giovanna Puoti
- From the Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Amit Assa
- The Juliet Keidan Institute of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Marc Benninga
- the Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ilse Julia Broekaert
- the Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Francisco Javier Martin Carpi
- the Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jernej Dolinsek
- the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Matjaz Homan
- the Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Emmanuel Mas
- the Service de Gastroentérologie, Hépatologie, Nutrition, Diabétologie et Maladies Héréditaires du Métabolisme, Hôpital des Enfants, CHU de Toulouse, F-31300 Toulouse, France, and IRSD, Université de Toulouse, INSERM, INRAE, ENVT, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Erasmo Miele
- the Department of Translational Medicine Science, Section of Paediatrics, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Christos Tzivinikos
- the Paediatric Gastroenterology Department, Al Jalila Children's Specialty Hospital, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mike Thomson
- the Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Weston Bank, Sheffield, UK
| | - Osvaldo Borrelli
- From the Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gastroesophageal Reflux Treatment in Infancy Through Young Adulthood. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:452-458. [PMID: 36717189 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux treatment varies greatly across the pediatric age spectrum. Infant reflux treatments rely heavily on nutritional interventions, whereas reflux in older children is treated more commonly with medications. However, because of the broad differential diagnosis, treatment nonresponse merits a re-evaluation of the diagnosis being treated and additional testing to provide a more precision-medicine approach to care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Zamani NF, Sjahid AS, Tuan Kamauzaman TH, Lee YY, Islam MA. Efficacy and Safety of Domperidone in Combination with Proton Pump Inhibitors in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11185268. [PMID: 36142915 PMCID: PMC9505562 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11185268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The aims of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment are symptom relief and healing of oesophagitis. Besides proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), prokinetic agents are also commonly prescribed to treat GERD. Domperidone, a well-known antiemetic, is an example of a prokinetic agent. It is a dopaminergic blocker that increases lower oesophagus sphincter pressure and activates gastric motility. We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the benefits of domperidone in addition to PPI therapy for GERD. We searched for publications comparing PPI plus domperidone to PPI monotherapy in terms of symptom improvement in GERD (until 21 April 2022) on PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, WHO’s International Clinical Studies Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov without restricting date, language, or study design. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021242076). This meta-analysis incorporated 11 studies with a total of 841 participants (419 in the PPI plus domperidone group and 422 in the PPI monotherapy group). The combination of a PPI and domperidone resulted in a significant reduction in global GERD symptoms. Adverse events associated with PPI plus domperidone treatment were similar to those associated with PPI monotherapy. In conclusion, the combination of domperidone and a PPI is generally safe and effective in treating GERD as compared with that of PPI alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Fathurah Zamani
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
| | - Afifah Sjamun Sjahid
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- Correspondence: (A.S.S.); or (M.A.I.)
| | - Tuan Hairulnizam Tuan Kamauzaman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
| | - Yeong Yeh Lee
- Department of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- GI Function & Motility Unit, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
| | - Md Asiful Islam
- Department of Haematology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu 16150, Malaysia
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Correspondence: (A.S.S.); or (M.A.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cresi F, Cester EA, Salvatore S, De Rose DU, Ripepi A, Magistà AM, Fontana C, Maggiora E, Coscia A, Francavilla R, Cristofori F. Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance and pH Monitoring: A Step Towards Pediatric Reference Values. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 26:370-377. [PMID: 32606258 PMCID: PMC7329155 DOI: 10.5056/jnm19205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII/pH) is considered the most accurate test to detect gastroesophageal reflux (GER), however lacking reference values. We aim to determine reference values for the pediatric population and to correlate these values with age and postprandial/fasting period. Methods We evaluated MII/pH traces from patients (newborns, infants, and children) admitted to 3 Italian hospitals and who underwent MII/ pH for suspected GER disease. Patients with MII/pH traces that showed significant symptom-reflux associations and/or a pathological reflux index (> 6% for newborns and infants, > 3% for children) were excluded. Traces were analysed in their entirety, and in the postprandial period (first hour after a meal) and the fasting period (the following hours before the next meal) separately. Results A total of 195 patients (46 newborns, 83 infants, and 66 children) were included. Age positively correlated with frequency of acidic GER events (r = 0.37, P < 0.05) and negatively associated with weakly acidic GER events (r = 0.46, P < 0.05). Conclusions This study describes the distribution of MII/pH values in a pediatric population with normally acidic GER exposure and no significant association between GER events and symptoms. These MII/pH values may be used as reference values in clinical practice for a corrected GER disease diagnosis in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cresi
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Andrea Cester
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Umberto De Rose
- Department of Pediatrics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Ripepi
- Pediatric Department, Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Magistà
- Department of Pediatrics, Aldo Moro University of Bari - Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudia Fontana
- Department of Pediatrics, Aldo Moro University of Bari - Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Elena Maggiora
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandra Coscia
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Ruggiero Francavilla
- Department of Pediatrics, Aldo Moro University of Bari - Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Fernanda Cristofori
- Department of Pediatrics, Aldo Moro University of Bari - Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Al-Saif FA, El-Habeeb AA, Refat MS, Eldaroti HH, Adam AMA, Fetooh H, Saad HA. Chemical and physical properties of the charge transfer complexes of domperidone antiemetic agent with π-acceptors. J Mol Liq 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.111517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
7
|
Bor S, Demir M, Ozdemir O, Yuksel K. A meta-analysis on the cardiac safety profile of domperidone compared to metoclopramide. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6:1331-1346. [PMID: 30386606 PMCID: PMC6206542 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618799153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis aimed to assess the cardiac safety profile of domperidone treatment for the risk of cardiovascular (CV) event and QT prolongation. METHODS Data from nine studies involving 101,155 patients were used for the analysis of CV event risk, while data from eight studies involving 390 patients were used for the analysis of QT prolongation risk. RESULTS Meta-analysis findings suggested a significant increase in CV risk under domperidone as compared to no treatment for domperidone doses of >30 mg/day (OR: 3.14, 95% CI, 1.191 to 8.304, p = 0.021), no significant increase in QT prolongation event rates with domperidone (3.54%, 95% CI, 1.73% to 7.10%) and a significantly lower CV risk for domperidone than for metoclopramide (OR: 0.63, 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.70, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The present meta-analysis indicates that domperidone treatment may not be associated with an overall CV event risk increase at doses ≤30 mg/day and does not result in QT prolongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhat Bor
- Ege University School of Medicine,
Division of Gastroenterology, Ege Reflux Study Group, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mesut Demir
- Cukurova University School of Medicine,
Division of Cardiology, Adana, Turkey
| | - Oktay Ozdemir
- Yorum Consulting Ltd., Department of
Statistics, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kivanc Yuksel
- Ege
University Centre for Drug Research & Development Pharmacokinetic Research and
Applications (ARGEFAR), Bornova, Izmir,
Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Singendonk MMJ, Brink AJ, Steutel NF, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, van Wijk MP, Benninga MA, Tabbers MM. Variations in Definitions and Outcome Measures in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2017; 140:e20164166. [PMID: 28751614 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-4166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is defined as GER disease (GERD) when it leads to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. We hypothesized that definitions and outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on pediatric GERD would be heterogeneous. OBJECTIVES Systematically assess definitions and outcome measures in RCTs in this population. DATA SOURCES Data were obtained through Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Pubmed databases. STUDY SELECTION We selected English-written therapeutic RCTs concerning GERD in children 0 to 18 years old. DATA EXTRACTION Data were tabulated and presented descriptively. Each individual parameter or set of parameters with unique criteria for interpretation was considered a single definition for GER(D). Quality was assessed by using the Delphi score. RESULTS A total of 2410 unique articles were found; 46 articles were included. Twenty-six (57%) studies defined GER by using 25 different definitions and investigated 25 different interventions. GERD was defined in 21 (46%) studies, all using a unique definition and investigating a total of 23 interventions. Respectively 87 and 61 different primary outcome measures were reported by the studies in GER and GERD. Eight (17%) studies did not report on side effects. Of the remaining 38 (83%) studies that did report on side effects, 18 (47%) included this as predefined outcome measure of which 4 (22%) as a primary outcome measure. Sixteen studies (35%) were of good methodological quality. LIMITATIONS Only English-written studies were included. CONCLUSIONS Inconsistency and heterogeneity exist in definitions and outcome measures used in RCTs on pediatric GER and GERD; therefore, we recommend the development of a core outcome set.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje M J Singendonk
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands;
| | - Anna J Brink
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nina F Steutel
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, and
| | | | - Michiel P van Wijk
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc A Benninga
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Merit M Tabbers
- Department of Pediatric Gastro Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ngoenmak T, Treepongkaruna S, Buddharaksa Y, Khositseth A. Effects of Domperidone on QT Interval in Children with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Pediatr Neonatol 2016; 57:60-4. [PMID: 26141480 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2014] [Revised: 01/24/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Domperidone has been widely used in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Studies on the effects of domperidone on corrected QT interval (QTc) in young children are limited. Our aim was to study the effect of domperidone on the repolarization abnormalities assessed by electrocardiogram (ECG) in young children. METHODS ECG was performed in children <2 years of age before and after taking domperidone orally 0.3 mg/kg three times/day for at least a 1 week period. Each ECG was reviewed and QT, RR, and Tpeak to Tend intervals (TpTe) were measured to calculate the QTc and TpTe/QT ratio. RESULTS A total of 22 patients (12 male) with a median age of 8.5 months (1-24 months) were enrolled. Most patients (59.1%) were under 1 year of age. The median baseline QTc (410 milliseconds, 350-450 milliseconds) was not significantly different from the QTc after taking domperidone (410 milliseconds, 320-560 milliseconds), p = 0.159. Only two patients showed a QTc increase ≥450 milliseconds. The baseline TpTe interval and TpTe/QT (105 milliseconds, 60-170 milliseconds and 0.27 milliseconds, 0.15-0.43 milliseconds) were significantly greater than the TpTe interval and TpTe/QT in children after taking domperidone (90 milliseconds, 60-140 milliseconds and 0.22 milliseconds, 0.15-0.29 milliseconds), p = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our data demonstrate that domperidone treatment over a short-term period in children <2 years of age did not lengthen QTc significantly; however, QTc increased ≥450 milliseconds in two patients with concomitant lansoprazole. Routine baseline and follow-up ECG may not be necessary in each individual case receiving only domperidone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thitima Ngoenmak
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
| | - Suporn Treepongkaruna
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | - Yuthapong Buddharaksa
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok 65000, Thailand
| | - Anant Khositseth
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dutta S, Singh B, Chessell L, Wilson J, Janes M, McDonald K, Shahid S, Gardner VA, Hjartarson A, Purcha M, Watson J, de Boer C, Gaal B, Fusch C. Guidelines for feeding very low birth weight infants. Nutrients 2015; 7:423-42. [PMID: 25580815 PMCID: PMC4303848 DOI: 10.3390/nu7010423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 183] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2014] [Accepted: 12/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the fact that feeding a very low birth weight (VLBW) neonate is a fundamental and inevitable part of its management, this is a field which is beset with controversies. Optimal nutrition improves growth and neurological outcomes, and reduces the incidence of sepsis and possibly even retinopathy of prematurity. There is a great deal of heterogeneity of practice among neonatologists and pediatricians regarding feeding VLBW infants. A working group on feeding guidelines for VLBW infants was constituted in McMaster University, Canada. The group listed a number of important questions that had to be answered with respect to feeding VLBW infants, systematically reviewed the literature, critically appraised the level of evidence, and generated a comprehensive set of guidelines. These guidelines form the basis of this state-of-art review. The review touches upon trophic feeding, nutritional feeding, fortification, feeding in special circumstances, assessment of feed tolerance, and management of gastric residuals, gastro-esophageal reflux, and glycerin enemas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sourabh Dutta
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Balpreet Singh
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Lorraine Chessell
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Wilson
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Marianne Janes
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Kimberley McDonald
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Shaneela Shahid
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Victoria A Gardner
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Aune Hjartarson
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Margaret Purcha
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jennifer Watson
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Chris de Boer
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Barbara Gaal
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Christoph Fusch
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University Children's Hospital, Hamilton L8S4L8, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tighe M, Afzal NA, Bevan A, Hayen A, Munro A, Beattie RM. Pharmacological treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 2014:CD008550. [PMID: 25419906 PMCID: PMC8947620 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd008550.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) is a common disorder, characterised by regurgitation of gastric contents into the oesophagus. GOR is a very common presentation in infancy in both primary and secondary care settings. GOR can affect approximately 50% of infants younger than three months old (Nelson 1997). The natural history of GOR in infancy is generally that of a functional, self-limiting condition that improves with age; < 5% of children with vomiting or regurgitation continue to have symptoms after infancy (Martin 2002). Older children and children with co-existing medical conditions can have a more protracted course. The definition of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and its precise distinction from GOR are debated, but consensus guidelines from the North American Society of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN-ESPGHAN guidelines 2009) define GORD as 'troublesome symptoms or complications of GOR.' OBJECTIVES This Cochrane review aims to provide a robust analysis of currently available pharmacological interventions used to treat children with GOR by assessing all outcomes indicating benefit or harm. SEARCH METHODS We sought to identify relevant published trials by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE and EMBASE (1966 to 2014), the Centralised Information Service for Complementary Medicine (CISCOM), the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Science Citation Index (on BIDS-UK General Science Index) and the ISI Web of Science. We also searched for ongoing trials in the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com).Reference lists from trials selected by electronic searching were handsearched for relevant paediatric studies on medical treatment of children with gastro-oesophageal reflux, as were published abstracts from conference proceedings (published in Gut and Gastroenterology) and reviews published over the past five years.No language restrictions were applied. SELECTION CRITERIA Abstracts were reviewed by two review authors, and relevant RCTs on study participants (birth to 16 years) with GOR receiving a pharmacological treatment were selected. Subgroup analysis was considered for children up to 12 months of age, and for children 12 months to 16 years of age, and for those with neurological impairment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Trials were critically appraised and data collected by two review authors. Risk of bias was assessed. Meta-analysis data were independently extracted by two review authors, and suitable outcome data were analysed using RevMan. MAIN RESULTS A total of 24 studies (1201 participants) contributed data to the review. The review authors had several concerns regarding the studies. Pharmaceutical company support for manuscript preparation was a common feature; also, because common endpoints were lacking, study populations were heterogenous and variations in study design were noted, individual drug meta-analysis was not possible.Moderate-quality evidence from individual studies suggests that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can reduce GOR symptoms in children with confirmed erosive oesophagitis. It was not possible to demonstrate statistical superiority of one PPI agent over another.Some evidence indicates that H₂antagonists are effective in treating children with GORD. Methodological differences precluded performance of meta-analysis on individual agents or on these agents as a class, in comparison with placebo or head-to-head versus PPIs, and additional studies are required.RCT evidence is insufficient to permit assessment of the efficacy of prokinetics. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy of domperidone.In younger children, the largest RCT of 80 children (one to 18 months of age) with GOR showed no evidence of improvement in symptoms and 24-hour pH probe, but improvement in symptoms and reflux index was noted in a subgroup treated with domperidone and co-magaldrox(Maalox(®) ). In another RCT of 17 children, after eight weeks of therapy. 33% of participants treated with domperidone noted an improvement in symptoms (P value was not significant). In neonates, the evidence is even weaker; one RCT of 26 neonates treated with domperidone over 24 hours showed that although reflux frequency was significantly increased, reflux duration was significantly improved.Diversity of RCT evidence was found regarding efficacy of compound alginate preparations(Gaviscon Infant(®) ) in infants, although as a result of these studies, Gaviscon Infant(®) was changed to become aluminium-free and has been assessed in its current form in only two studies since 1999. Given the diversity of study designs and the heterogeneity of outcomes, as well as the evolution in formulation, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis on the efficacy of Gaviscon Infant(®) . Moderate evidence indicates that Gaviscon Infant(®) improves symptoms in infants, including those with functional reflux; the largest study of the current formulation showed improvement in symptom control but was limited by length of follow-up.No serious side effects were reported.No RCTs on pharmacological treatments for children with neurodisability were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Moderate evidence was found to support the use of PPIs, along with some evidence to support the use of H₂ antagonists in older children with GORD, based on improvement in symptom scores, pH indices and endoscopic/histological appearances. However, lack of independent placebo-controlled and head-to-head trials makes conclusions as to relative efficacy difficult to determine. Further RCTs are recommended. No robust RCT evidence is available to support the use of domperidone, and further studies on prokinetics are recommended, including assessments of erythromycin.Pharmacological treatment of infants with reflux symptoms is problematic, as many infants have GOR, and little correlation has been noted between reported symptoms and endoscopic and pH findings. Better evidence has been found to support the use of PPIs in infants with GORD, but heterogeneity in outcomes and in study design impairs interpretation of placebo-controlled data regarding efficacy. Some evidence is available to support the use of Gaviscon Infant(®) , but further studies with longer follow-up times are recommended. Studies of omeprazole and lansoprazole in infants with functional GOR have demonstrated variable benefit, probably because of differences in inclusion criteria.No robust RCT evidence has been found regarding treatment of preterm babies with GOR/GORD or children with neurodisabilities. Initiation of RCTs with common endpoints is recommended, given the frequency of treatment and the use of multiple antireflux agents in these children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Tighe
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of PaediatricsLongfleet RoadPooleDorsetUKBH15 2JB
| | - Nadeem A Afzal
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustChild HealthTremona RoadSouthamptonHampshireUKSO16 6YD
| | - Amanda Bevan
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of PharmacyTremona RoadSouthamptonHampshireUK
| | - Andrew Hayen
- University of TechnologyFaculty of HealthUltimoNSWAustralia2007
| | - Alasdair Munro
- Poole Hospital NHS Foundation TrustDepartment of PaediatricsLongfleet RoadPooleDorsetUKBH15 2JB
| | - R Mark Beattie
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustChild HealthTremona RoadSouthamptonHampshireUKSO16 6YD
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Corvaglia L, Monari C, Martini S, Aceti A, Faldella G. Pharmacological therapy of gastroesophageal reflux in preterm infants. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013; 2013:714564. [PMID: 23878533 PMCID: PMC3710644 DOI: 10.1155/2013/714564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Revised: 05/22/2013] [Accepted: 06/12/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Although gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a very common phenomenon among preterm infants, its therapeutic management is still an issue of debate among neonatologists. A step-wise approach should be advisable, firstly promoting nonpharmacological interventions and limiting drugs to selected infants unresponsive to the conservative measures or who are suffering from severe GER with clinical complications. Despite of this, a concerning pharmacological overtreatment has been increasingly reported. Most of the antireflux drugs, however, have not been specifically assessed in preterm infants; moreover, serious adverse effects have been noticed in association to their administration. This review mainly aims to draw the state of the art regarding the pharmacological management of GER in preterm infants, analyzing the best piecies of evidence currently available on the most prescribed anti-reflux drugs. Although further trials are required, sodium alginate-based formulations might be considered promising; however, data regarding their safety are still limited. Few piecies of evidence on the efficacy of histamine-2 receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors in preterm infants with GER are currently available. Nevertheless, a significantly increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis and infections has been largely reported in association with their use, thereby leading to an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The efficacy of metoclopramide in GER's improvement still needs to be clarified. Other prokinetic agents, such as domperidone and erythromycin, have been reported to be ineffective, whereas cisapride has been withdrawn due to its remarkable cardiac adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Corvaglia
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 11, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| | - Caterina Monari
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 11, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Martini
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 11, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Arianna Aceti
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 11, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giacomo Faldella
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, via Massarenti 11, 40138 Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cresi F, Locatelli E, Marinaccio C, Grasso G, Coscia A, Bertino E. Prognostic values of multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in newborns with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Pediatr 2013; 162:770-5. [PMID: 23146428 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2012] [Revised: 08/29/2012] [Accepted: 10/03/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the relationship between multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII/pH) values in newborns with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and clinical history in their first 3 years of life. STUDY DESIGN Sixty-four newborns with GERD symptoms who underwent MII/pH in the first weeks of life were enrolled into a clinical follow-up program. Follow-up visits were programmed at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to duration of symptoms: short (1-3 months), medium (4-9 months), and long (>9 months), and MII/pH values in these groups were compared. RESULTS Fifty-three patients completed the 3-year follow-up. The number of patients with GERD symptoms decreased each month. A comparison of MII/pH values of the 3 lifetime symptom groups revealed differences in the impedance bolus exposure index (F = 83; P = .012) and proximal reflux frequency (F = 410; P = .022). These 2 MII variables showed an increasing trend from the short lifetime symptom group to the long lifetime symptom group. Weakly acidic reflux events, but not acidic events, were responsible for these differences. CONCLUSION MII/pH in newborns has prognostic value regarding the duration of GERD symptoms and provides useful information that clinicians may give parents about the prognosis of symptomatic infants. Impedance bolus exposure index and proximal reflux frequency seem to be the variables with the highest predictive value. Weakly acidic reflux events play an important role in determining the duration of GERD symptoms in newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cresi
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, S. Anna-Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|