1
|
Non-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Immunity and Genetic Insights. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071506. [PMID: 35884811 PMCID: PMC9312985 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system has been considered the main target for alloimmunity, but the non-HLA antibodies and autoimmunity have gained importance in kidney transplantation (KT). Apart from the endothelial injury, secondary self-antigen exposure and the presence of polymorphic alloantigens, respectively, auto- and allo- non-HLA antibodies shared common steps in their development, such as: antigen recognition via indirect pathway by recipient antigen presenting cells, autoreactive T cell activation, autoreactive B cell activation, T helper 17 cell differentiation, loss of self-tolerance and epitope spreading phenomena. Both alloimmunity and autoimmunity play a synergic role in the formation of non-HLA antibodies, and the emergence of transcriptomics and genome-wide evaluation techniques has led to important progress in understanding the mechanistic features. Among them, non-HLA mismatches between donors and recipients provide valuable information regarding the role of genetics in non-HLA antibody immunity and development.
Collapse
|
2
|
Butler CL, Hickey MJ, Jiang N, Zheng Y, Gjertson D, Zhang Q, Rao P, Fishbein GA, Cadeiras M, Deng MC, Banchs HL, Torre G, DeNofrio D, Eisen HJ, Kobashigawa J, Starling RC, Kfoury A, Van Bakel A, Ewald G, Balazs I, Baas AS, Cruz D, Ardehali R, Biniwale R, Kwon M, Ardehali A, Nsair A, Ray B, Reed EF. Discovery of non-HLA antibodies associated with cardiac allograft rejection and development and validation of a non-HLA antigen multiplex panel: From bench to bedside. Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2768-2780. [PMID: 32185871 PMCID: PMC7494540 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 03/04/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We analyzed humoral immune responses to nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) after cardiac transplantation to identify antibodies associated with allograft rejection. Protein microarray identified 366 non-HLA antibodies (>1.5 fold, P < .5) from a discovery cohort of HLA antibody-negative, endothelial cell crossmatch-positive sera obtained from 12 cardiac allograft recipients at the time of biopsy-proven rejection. From these, 19 plasma membrane proteins and 10 autoantigens identified from gene ontology analysis were combined with 48 proteins identified through literature search to generate a multiplex bead array. Longitudinal sera from a multicenter cohort of adult cardiac allograft recipients (samples: n = 477 no rejection; n = 69 rejection) identified 18 non-HLA antibodies associated with rejection (P < .1) including 4 newly identified non-HLA antigenic targets (DEXI, EMCN, LPHN1, and SSB). CART analysis showed 5/18 non-HLA antibodies distinguished rejection vs nonrejection. Antibodies to 4/18 non-HLA antigens synergize with HLA donor-specific antibodies and significantly increase the odds of rejection (P < .1). The non-HLA panel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n = 21 no rejection; n = 42 rejection, >1R) with an area under the curve of 0.87 (P < .05) with 92.86% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity. We conclude that multiplex bead array assessment of non-HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie L. Butler
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michelle J. Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Ying Zheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - David Gjertson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ping Rao
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gregory A. Fishbein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Martin Cadeiras
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mario C. Deng
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Hector L. Banchs
- Cardiovascular Center of Puerto Rico and the Caribbean Transplant Program, Carolina, Puerto Rico
| | - Guillermo Torre
- Houston Methodist Hospital Research Institution, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Howard J. Eisen
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Adrian Van Bakel
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Gregory Ewald
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Arnold S. Baas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Cruz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Reza Ardehali
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Reshma Biniwale
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Murray Kwon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Abbas Ardehali
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ali Nsair
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Elaine F. Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pearl MH, Chen L, ElChaki R, Elashoff D, Gjertson DW, Rossetti M, Weng PL, Zhang Q, Reed EF, Chambers ET. Endothelin Type A Receptor Antibodies Are Associated With Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibodies, Vascular Inflammation, and Decline in Renal Function in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5:1925-1936. [PMID: 33163713 PMCID: PMC7609952 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Autoantibody to angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab) has been recognized as a non-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody relevant in transplantation. Endothelin type A receptor antibody (ETAR-Ab) has been strongly associated with AT1R-Ab, but the data in kidney transplantation are scarce. Methods We examined the relationship of ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab with clinical outcomes, biopsy findings, inflammatory cytokines, and HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a cohort of pediatric renal transplant recipients. Sixty-five patients were longitudinally monitored for ETAR-Ab, AT1R-Ab, HLA DSA, interleukin (IL)-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-1β, interferon-γ, IL-17, IL-6, renal dysfunction, hypertension, rejection, and allograft loss during the first 2 years post-transplant. Results Fifteen patients (23%) had AT1R-Ab alone, 1 (2%) had ETAR-Ab alone, 23 (35%) had both ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab, and 26 (40%) were negative for both antibodies at all timepoints. Having both ETAR-Ab and AT1R-Ab was associated with >30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (P = 0.024), arteritis (P = 0.016), and elevated IL-8 levels (P = 0.010), but not rejection, HLA DSA, or allograft loss. Having both antibodies resulted in greater increases in IL-8 compared with AT1R-Ab alone, even when controlled for additional clinical factors, including HLA DSA (P = 0.012). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that, in pediatric kidney transplantation, ETAR-Ab is highly associated with AT1R-Ab, but there are a subset of patients with AT1R-Ab alone. Having both antibodies is significantly associated with arteritis, elevated IL-8, and decline in renal function, and our results suggest possible interaction effects. Better understanding of this interaction may be informative in developing protocols for testing, treatment, and prevention of allograft injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan H Pearl
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lucia Chen
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Rim ElChaki
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - David W Gjertson
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maura Rossetti
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Patricia L Weng
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Qiuheng Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eileen Tsai Chambers
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.,Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siu JH, Motallebzadeh R, Pettigrew GJ. Humoral autoimmunity after solid organ transplantation: Germinal ideas may not be natural. Cell Immunol 2020; 354:104131. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2020.104131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
5
|
Kamburova EG, Gruijters ML, Kardol‐Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Melchers RCA, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, ten Berge IJM, Hoitsma A, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Bemelman FJ, Otten HG. Antibodies against ARHGDIB are associated with long-term kidney graft loss. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:3335-3344. [PMID: 31194283 PMCID: PMC6899679 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The clinical significance of non-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival is a matter of debate, due to differences in reported results and lack of large-scale studies incorporating analysis of multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously. We developed a multiplex non-HLA antibody assay against 14 proteins highly expressed in the kidney. In this study, the presence of pretransplant non-HLA antibodies was correlated to renal allograft survival in a nationwide cohort of 4770 recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2006. Autoantibodies against Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 (ARHGDIB) were significantly associated with graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased-donor kidney (N = 3276) but not in recipients of a living-donor kidney (N = 1496). At 10 years after deceased-donor transplantation, recipients with anti-ARHGDIB antibodies (94/3276 = 2.9%) had a 13% lower death-censored covariate-adjusted graft survival compared to the anti-ARHGDIB-negative (3182/3276 = 97.1%) population (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.53; P = .0003). These antibodies occur independently from donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) or other non-HLA antibodies investigated. No significant relations with graft loss were found for the other 13 non-HLA antibodies. We suggest that pretransplant risk assessment can be improved by measuring anti-ARHGDIB antibodies in all patients awaiting deceased-donor transplantation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Luo H, Wang L, Bao D, Wang L, Zhao H, Lian Y, Yan M, Mohan C, Li QZ. Novel Autoantibodies Related to Cell Death and DNA Repair Pathways in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. GENOMICS PROTEOMICS & BIOINFORMATICS 2019; 17:248-259. [PMID: 31494269 PMCID: PMC6818352 DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2018.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune syndrome characterized by various co-existing autoantibodies (autoAbs) in patients’ blood. However, the full spectrum of autoAbs in SLE has not been comprehensively elucidated. In this study, a commercial platform bearing 9400 antigens (ProtoArray) was used to identify autoAbs that were significantly elevated in the sera of SLE patients. By comparing the autoAb profiles of SLE patients with those of healthy controls, we identified 437 IgG and 1213 IgM autoAbs that the expression levels were significantly increased in SLE (P < 0.05). Use of the ProtoArray platform uncovered over 300 novel autoAbs targeting a broad range of nuclear, cytoplasmic, and membrane antigens. Molecular interaction network analysis revealed that the antigens targeted by the autoAbs were most significantly enriched in cell death, cell cycle, and DNA repair pathways. A group of autoAbs associated with cell apoptosis and DNA repair function, including those targeting APEX1, AURKA, POLB, AGO1, HMGB1, IFIT5, MAPKAPK3, PADI4, RGS3, SRP19, UBE2S, and VRK1, were further validated by ELISA and Western blot in a larger cohort. In addition, the levels of autoAbs against APEX1, HMGB1, VRK1, AURKA, PADI4, and SRP19 were positively correlated with the level of anti-dsDNA in SLE patients. Comprehensive autoAb screening has identified novel autoAbs, which may shed light on potential pathogenic pathways leading to lupus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Luo
- Department of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Ding Bao
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Science, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Hongjun Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Yun Lian
- Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mei Yan
- Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Chandra Mohan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA
| | - Quan-Zhen Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China; Department of Immunology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamburova EG, Hoitsma A, Claas FH, Otten HG. Results and reflections from the PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions in kidney transplantation: A mini-review. HLA 2019; 94:129-140. [PMID: 31099989 PMCID: PMC6772180 DOI: 10.1111/tan.13581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD). The waiting time for a deceased donor kidney in the Netherlands is approximately 3 years. Mortality among patients on the waiting list is high. The aim of the PROCARE consortium (PROfiling Consortium on Antibody Repertoire and Effector functions) was to decrease the waiting time by providing a matching algorithm yielding a prolonged graft survival and less HLA‐immunization compared with the currently used Eurotransplant Kidney allocation system. In this study, 6097 kidney transplants carried out between January 1995 and December 2005 were re‐examined with modern laboratory techniques and insights that were not available during that time period. In this way, we could identify potential new parameters that can be used to improve the matching algorithm and prolong graft survival. All eight University Medical Centers in the Netherlands participated in this multicenter study. To improve the matching algorithm, we used as central hypothesis that the combined presence of class‐I and ‐II single‐antigen bead (SAB)‐defined donor‐specific HLA antibodies (DSA) prior to transplantation, non‐HLA antibodies, the number of B‐ and/or T‐cell epitopes recognized on donor HLA, and specific polymorphisms in effector mechanisms of IgG were associated with an increased risk for graft failure. The purpose of this article is to relate the results obtained from the PROCARE consortium study to other studies published in recent years. The clinical relevance of SAB‐defined DSA, complement‐fixing DSA, non‐HLA antibodies, and the effector functions of (non)‐HLA‐antibodies will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andries Hoitsma
- Dutch Organ Transplant Registry (NOTR), Dutch Transplant Foundation (NTS), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sensitization to endothelial cell antigens: Unraveling the cause or effect paradox. Hum Immunol 2019; 80:614-620. [PMID: 31054781 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) have been correlated with increased acute and chronic rejection across all organ types and early graft dysfunction in kidney and heart transplantation. Nevertheless, the lack of appropriate tools and clear criteria for defining injurious versus non-injurious AECAs prohibits their routine inclusion in clinical risk assessments and diagnostic algorithms for antibody mediated injury. Clinical characterization of AECAs is complicated due to the wide range of polymorphic and non-polymorphic antigens expressed across different vascular tissues and the diverse array of specificities observed between individuals. This complexity is also reflected in the broad spectrum of reported injury phenotypes. AECAs detected at time of allograft dysfunction may represent biomarkers of past vascular injury or active contributors to a current rejection process. New tools within the fields of proteomics, genomics, bioinformatics, and imaging are currently being validated and hold great promise for unraveling the AECA paradox.
Collapse
|
9
|
Anglicheau D, Delville M, Lamarthee B. Non anti-HLA antibodies and acute rejection: A critical viewpoint. Nephrol Ther 2019; 15 Suppl 1:S53-S59. [PMID: 30981396 DOI: 10.1016/j.nephro.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
In solid organ transplantation, the deleterious effect of antibodies directed against donor HLA antigens, whether preformed or de novo, is well established. Anti-HLA antibodies have been associated not only with the risk of antibody-mediated rejection but also with late graft dysfunction and are now considered to be the leading cause of allograft loss after renal transplantation. In addition to HLA antibodies, the possible involvement of non-HLA antibodies targeting donor endothelial cells has long been the subject of intense research. The purpose of this review is to discuss current knowledge and remaining issues related to the involvement of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation. More specifically, the clinical data underlying the hypothesis of the role of non-HLA antibodies will be discussed, as well as the different techniques for antibody detection, their clinical relevance and their antigenic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dany Anglicheau
- Service de néphrologie et transplantation rénale adulte, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Inserm, U1151, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - Marianne Delville
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Service de biothérapie, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Inserm, U1163, 24, boulevard de Montparnasse, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Lamarthee
- Service de néphrologie et transplantation rénale adulte, hôpital Necker-Enfants-Malades, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, 12, rue de l'École-de-Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Inserm, U1151, 149, rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Delville M, Lamarthée B, Pagie S, See SB, Rabant M, Burger C, Gatault P, Giral M, Thaunat O, Arzouk N, Hertig A, Hazzan M, Matignon M, Mariat C, Caillard S, Kamar N, Sayegh J, Westeel PF, Garrouste C, Ladrière M, Vuiblet V, Rivalan J, Merville P, Bertrand D, Le Moine A, Duong Van Huyen JP, Cesbron A, Cagnard N, Alibeu O, Satchell SC, Legendre C, Zorn E, Taupin JL, Charreau B, Anglicheau D. Early Acute Microvascular Kidney Transplant Rejection in the Absence of Anti-HLA Antibodies Is Associated with Preformed IgG Antibodies against Diverse Glomerular Endothelial Cell Antigens. J Am Soc Nephrol 2019; 30:692-709. [PMID: 30850439 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018080868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 01/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although anti-HLA antibodies (Abs) cause most antibody-mediated rejections of renal allografts, non-anti-HLA Abs have also been postulated to contribute. A better understanding of such Abs in rejection is needed. METHODS We conducted a nationwide study to identify kidney transplant recipients without anti-HLA donor-specific Abs who experienced acute graft dysfunction within 3 months after transplantation and showed evidence of microvascular injury, called acute microvascular rejection (AMVR). We developed a crossmatch assay to assess serum reactivity to human microvascular endothelial cells, and used a combination of transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to identify non-HLA Abs. RESULTS We identified a highly selected cohort of 38 patients with early acute AMVR. Biopsy specimens revealed intense microvascular inflammation and the presence of vasculitis (in 60.5%), interstitial hemorrhages (31.6%), or thrombotic microangiopathy (15.8%). Serum samples collected at the time of transplant showed that previously proposed anti-endothelial cell Abs-angiotensin type 1 receptor (AT1R), endothelin-1 type A and natural polyreactive Abs-did not increase significantly among patients with AMVR compared with a control group of stable kidney transplant recipients. However, 26% of the tested AMVR samples were positive for AT1R Abs when a threshold of 10 IU/ml was used. The crossmatch assay identified a common IgG response that was specifically directed against constitutively expressed antigens of microvascular glomerular cells in patients with AMVR. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified new targets of non-HLA Abs, with little redundancy among individuals. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that preformed IgG Abs targeting non-HLA antigens expressed on glomerular endothelial cells are associated with early AMVR, and that in vitro cell-based assays are needed to improve risk assessments before transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Delville
- French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1163 and.,Department of Biotherapy, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | | | - Sylvain Pagie
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Immunology, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Centre Européen des Sciences de la Transplantation et de l'Immunothérapie (CESTI), Laboratoire d'excellence (LabEx) Immunotherapy Graft Oncology (IGO), LabEx Transplantex, Nantes, France.,Nantes Universtity, Nantes, France
| | - Sarah B See
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Marion Rabant
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Department of Renal Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Carole Burger
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Gatault
- Service de Néphrologie-Hypertension, Transplantation et Dialyses, University Hospital, Tours, France.,Equipe d'Accueil EA4245, Transplantation, Immunologie et Inflammation (T2I), University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Magali Giral
- Nantes University Hospital, Institut de Transplantation-Urologie-Néphrologie (ITUN), Nantes, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology.,INSERM Unit 1111, Lyon, France.,Claude Berna Saint-Etienne University Hospital rd University (Lyon 1), Lyon, France
| | - Nadia Arzouk
- Department of Urology, Nephrology and Kidney transplantation, Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hertig
- Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Urgences Néphrologiques et Transplantation Rénale, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marc Hazzan
- Department of Nephrology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.,Lille University, Lille, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 995, Lille, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Créteil, France.,Paris-Est-Créteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France.,Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), Equipe 21, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 955, Créteil, France
| | - Christophe Mariat
- Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France.,Jean Monnet University, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) S1109, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1043, Institut Fédératif de Recherche Biomédicale de Toulouse (IFR-BMT), Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Johnny Sayegh
- Angers University, Angers, France.,Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | | | - Cyril Garrouste
- Department of Nephrology, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marc Ladrière
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - Vincent Vuiblet
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Reims University Hospital, Reims, France
| | - Joseph Rivalan
- Department of Nephrology, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.,Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Unité Mixte de Recherche (CNRS-UMR) 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, , Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Alain Le Moine
- Erasme Hospital, Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation Department, Bruxelles, Belgium.,Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Department of Renal Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Anne Cesbron
- HLA Laboratory, Etablissement Français du Sang (EFS) Centre Pays de la Loire, Nantes, France
| | - Nicolas Cagnard
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Bioinformatics, Structure Fédérative de Recherche Necker, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) US24/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMS3633, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Alibeu
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Genomics Core Facility, Institut Imagine-Structure Fédérative de Recherche Necker, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1163 and INSERM US24/ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMS3633, Paris, France
| | - Simon C Satchell
- Bristol Renal, Bristol Heart Institute, Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Great Britain
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France.,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1151, Paris, France.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, RTRS Centaure; LabEx Transplantex, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Zorn
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1160, LabEx Transplantex, Paris France; and.,University Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Béatrice Charreau
- Center for Research in Transplantation and Immunology, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) 1064, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) Centre Européen des Sciences de la Transplantation et de l'Immunothérapie (CESTI), Laboratoire d'excellence (LabEx) Immunotherapy Graft Oncology (IGO), LabEx Transplantex, Nantes, France.,Nantes Universtity, Nantes, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité University, Paris, France; .,Necker-Enfants Malades Institute, French National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) Unit 1151, Paris, France.,Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, RTRS Centaure; LabEx Transplantex, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sigdel TK, Sarwal MM. Discovery of Immune Reactive Human Proteins by High-Density Protein Arrays and Customized Validation of Potential Biomarkers by ELISA. Methods Mol Biol 2019; 1788:11-21. [PMID: 29116566 DOI: 10.1007/7651_2017_92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Because of our access to human genome data and ever-improving genome sequencing and proteome analysis methods, we are much better in terms of our understanding of biological processes. In addition to genomics, proteomics, and other "omics" methods, availability of more sophisticated molecular assaying methods has augmented our knowledge about immune processes toward auto- and allogeneic targets. High-density protein arrays are developed to analyze protein-small molecule interactions, enzyme-substrate profiling, protein-protein interaction, and immune monitoring by assessing antibodies in the serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. .,University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kamburova EG, Kardol-Hoefnagel T, Wisse BW, Joosten I, Allebes WA, van der Meer A, Hilbrands LB, Baas MC, Spierings E, Hack CE, van Reekum FE, van Zuilen AD, Verhaar MC, Bots ML, Drop ACAD, Plaisier L, Meeldijk J, Bovenschen N, Seelen MAJ, Sanders JS, Hepkema BG, Lambeck AJA, Bungener LB, Roozendaal C, Tilanus MGJ, Voorter CE, Wieten L, van Duijnhoven EM, Gelens MACJ, Christiaans MHL, van Ittersum FJ, Nurmohamed SA, Lardy NM, Swelsen W, van der Pant KAMI, van der Weerd NC, Ten Berge IJM, Bemelman FJ, van der Boog PJM, de Fijter JW, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Roelen DL, Claas FH, Otten HG. Development and Validation of a Multiplex Non-HLA Antibody Assay for the Screening of Kidney Transplant Recipients. Front Immunol 2018; 9:3002. [PMID: 30631326 PMCID: PMC6315148 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The best treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease is kidney transplantation. Although graft survival rates have improved in the last decades, patients still may lose their grafts partly due to the detrimental effects of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and to a lesser extent also by antibodies directed against non-HLA antigens expressed on the donor endothelium. Assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies are already in use for many years and have been proven useful for transplant risk stratification. Currently, there is a need for assays to additionally detect multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously in order to study their clinical relevance in solid organ transplantation. This study describes the development, technical details and validation of a high-throughput multiplex assay for the detection of antibodies against 14 non-HLA antigens coupled directly to MagPlex microspheres or indirectly via a HaloTag. The non-HLA antigens have been selected based on a literature search in patients with kidney disease or following transplantation. Due to the flexibility of the assay, this approach can be used to include alternative antigens and can also be used for screening of other organ transplant recipients, such as heart and lung.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena G Kamburova
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Tineke Kardol-Hoefnagel
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Bram W Wisse
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Irma Joosten
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Wil A Allebes
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Arnold van der Meer
- Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marije C Baas
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Eric Spierings
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis E Hack
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Franka E van Reekum
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Arjan D van Zuilen
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marianne C Verhaar
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adriaan C A D Drop
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Loes Plaisier
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jan Meeldijk
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Niels Bovenschen
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marc A J Seelen
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Jan Stephan Sanders
- Department of Nephrology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Bouke G Hepkema
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Annechien J A Lambeck
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Laura B Bungener
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Caroline Roozendaal
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Marcel G J Tilanus
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Christina E Voorter
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Wieten
- Tissue Typing Laboratory, Department of Transplantation Immunology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Elly M van Duijnhoven
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mariëlle A C J Gelens
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Maarten H L Christiaans
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frans J van Ittersum
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Shaikh A Nurmohamed
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Department of Nephrology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neubury M Lardy
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wendy Swelsen
- Department of Immunogenetics, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn A M I van der Pant
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Neelke C van der Weerd
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ineke J M Ten Berge
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frederike J Bemelman
- Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Johan W de Fijter
- Department of Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frans H Claas
- Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yang J, Claas FHJ, Eikmans M. Genome-wide association studies in kidney transplantation: Advantages and constraints. Transpl Immunol 2018; 49:1-4. [PMID: 29704558 DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system, the role of HLA molecules in the field of transplantation has been appreciated: better matching leads to better graft function. Since then, the association of other genetic polymorphisms with clinical outcome has been investigated in many studies. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) represent a powerful tool to identify causal genetic variants, by simultaneously analyzing millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms scattered across the genome. GWAS in transplantation may indeed be useful to reveal novel markers that may potentially be involved in the mechanism of allograft rejection and graft failure. However, the relevance of GWAS for risk stratification or donor selection for an individual patient is limited as is already reflected by the fact that many parameters, significant in one study, cannot be confirmed in another one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianxin Yang
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frans H J Claas
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Eikmans
- Dept. of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gates KV, Pereira NL, Griffiths LG. Cardiac Non-Human Leukocyte Antigen Identification: Techniques and Troubles. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1332. [PMID: 29093713 PMCID: PMC5651233 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Historically efforts have focused on the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) as the major cause for acute and chronic rejection following cardiac transplantation. However, rising evidence indicates that non-HLA antibodies can be both primary initiators and modifiers of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). The purpose of this review is to assess currently available technologies for non-HLA identification and leveraging such responses toward antibody quantification. Several techniques have been used to identify antigenic determinants of recipient graft-specific non-HLA humoral immune responses, but each comes with its own set of benefits and caveats. Improving our ability to detect non-HLA humoral immune response will aid in our understanding of the underlying antigenic determinants of AMR and CAV, as well as improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine V Gates
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.,Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Naveen L Pereira
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Leigh G Griffiths
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Ever since the discovery of the major histocompatibility complex, scientific and clinical understanding in the field of transplantation has been advanced through genetic and genomic studies. Candidate-gene approaches and recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have enabled a deeper understanding of the complex interplay of the donor-recipient interactions that lead to transplant tolerance or rejection. Genetic analysis in transplantation, when linked to demographic and clinical outcomes, has the potential to drive personalized medicine by enabling individualized risk stratification and immunosuppression through the identification of variants associated with immune-mediated complications, post-transplant disease or alterations in drug-metabolizing genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Y C Yang
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hanna MH, Dalla Gassa A, Mayer G, Zaza G, Brophy PD, Gesualdo L, Pesce F. The nephrologist of tomorrow: towards a kidney-omic future. Pediatr Nephrol 2017; 32:393-404. [PMID: 26961492 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3357-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Omics refers to the collective technologies used to explore the roles and relationships of the various types of molecules that make up the phenotype of an organism. Systems biology is a scientific discipline that endeavours to quantify all of the molecular elements of a biological system. Therefore, it reflects the knowledge acquired by omics in a meaningful manner by providing insights into functional pathways and regulatory networks underlying different diseases. The recent advances in biotechnological platforms and statistical tools to analyse such complex data have enabled scientists to connect the experimentally observed correlations to the underlying biochemical and pathological processes. We discuss in this review the current knowledge of different omics technologies in kidney diseases, specifically in the field of pediatric nephrology, including biomarker discovery, defining as yet unrecognized biologic therapeutic targets and linking omics to relevant standard indices and clinical outcomes. We also provide here a unique perspective on the field, taking advantage of the experience gained by the large-scale European research initiative called "Systems Biology towards Novel Chronic Kidney Disease Diagnosis and Treatment" (SysKid). Based on the integrative framework of Systems biology, SysKid demonstrated how omics are powerful yet complex tools to unravel the consequences of diabetes and hypertension on kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina H Hanna
- Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Gert Mayer
- Department of Internal Medicine IV (Nephrology and Hypertension), Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gianluigi Zaza
- Renal Unit, Department of Medicine, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Patrick D Brophy
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Iowa Children's Hospital, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Dipartimento Emergenza e Trapianti di Organi (D.E.T.O), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Francesco Pesce
- Dipartimento Emergenza e Trapianti di Organi (D.E.T.O), University of Bari, Bari, Italy. .,Cardiovascular Genetics and Genomics, National Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Matsuda Y, Sarwal MM. Unraveling the Role of Allo-Antibodies and Transplant Injury. Front Immunol 2016; 7:432. [PMID: 27818660 PMCID: PMC5073555 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Alloimmunity driving rejection in the context of solid organ transplantation can be grossly divided into mechanisms predominantly driven by either T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), though the co-existence of both types of rejections can be seen in a variable number of sampled grafts. Acute TCMR can generally be well controlled by the establishment of effective immunosuppression (1, 2). Acute ABMR is a low frequency finding in the current era of blood group and HLA donor/recipient matching and the avoidance of engraftment in the context of high-titer, preformed donor-specific antibodies. However, chronic ABMR remains a major complication resulting in the untimely loss of transplanted organs (3-10). The close relationship between donor-specific antibodies and ABMR has been revealed by the highly sensitive detection of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (7, 11-15). Injury to transplanted organs by activation of humoral immune reaction in the context of HLA identical transplants and the absence of donor specific antibodies (17-24), strongly suggest the participation of non-HLA (nHLA) antibodies in ABMR (25). In this review, we discuss the genesis of ABMR in the context of HLA and nHLA antibodies and summarize strategies for ABMR management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiko Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minnie M. Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
A LASSO Method to Identify Protein Signature Predicting Post-transplant Renal Graft Survival. STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES 2016; 9:431-452. [PMID: 29399205 DOI: 10.1007/s12561-016-9170-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Identifying novel biomarkers to predict renal graft survival is important in post-transplant clinical practice. Serum creatinine, currently the most popular surrogate biomarker, offers limited information of the underlying allograft profiles. It is known to perform unsatisfactorily to predict renal function. In this paper, we apply a LASSO machine-learning algorithm in the Cox proportional hazards model to identify promising proteins that are associated with the hazard of allograft loss after renal transplantation, motivated by a clinical pilot study that collected 47 patients receiving renal transplants at the University of Michigan Hospital. We assess the association of 17 proteins previously identified by Cibrik et al. [5] with allograft rejection in our regularized Cox regression analysis, where the LASSO variable selection method is applied to select important proteins that predict the hazard of allograft loss. We also develop a post-selection inference to further investigate the statistical significance of the proteins on the hazard of allograft loss, and conclude that two proteins KIM-1 and VEGF-R2 are important protein markers for risk prediction.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identification of allograft injury, including acute clinical and subclinical injury, is vital in increasing the longevity of the transplanted organ. Acute rejection, which occurs as a result of a variety of immune and non-immune factors including the infiltration of immune cells and antibodies to the donor specific epitopes, poses a significant risk to the organ. Recent years have marked an increase in the discovery of new genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic biomarkers in molecular diagnostics, which offer better potential for personalized management of the transplanted organ by providing earlier detection of rejection episodes. Areas covered: This review was compiled from key word searches of full-text publications relevant to the field. Expert commentary: Many of the recent advancements in the molecular diagnostics of allograft injury show much promise, but before they can be fully realized further validation in larger sample sets must be conducted. Additionally, for better informed therapeutic decisions, more work must be completed to differentiate between different causes of injury. Moreover, the diagnostics field is looking at methodologies that allow for multiplexing, the ability to identify multiple targets simultaneously, in order to provide more robust biomarkers and better understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Nasr
- Sarwal Lab, University of California, San Francisco
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Bioengineering & Therapeutic Sciences
- University of California, Berkeley, Department of Bioengineering
| | - Tara Sigdel
- Sarwal Lab, University of California, San Francisco
- Unversity of California, San Francisco Department of Surgery
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Sarwal Lab, University of California, San Francisco
- Unversity of California, San Francisco Department of Surgery
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The development of post-transplantation antibodies against non-HLA autoantigens is associated with rejection and decreased long-term graft survival. Although our knowledge of non-HLA antibodies is incomplete, compelling experimental and clinical findings demonstrate that antibodies directed against autoantigens such as angiotensin type 1 receptor, perlecan and collagen, contribute to the process of antibody-mediated acute and chronic rejection. The mechanisms that underlie the production of autoantibodies in the setting of organ transplantation is an important area of ongoing investigation. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury, surgical trauma and/or alloimmune responses can result in the release of organ-derived autoantigens (such as soluble antigens, extracellular vesicles or apoptotic bodies) that are presented to B cells in the context of the transplant recipient's antigen presenting cells and stimulate autoantibody production. Type 17 T helper cells orchestrate autoantibody production by supporting the proliferation and maturation of autoreactive B cells within ectopic tertiary lymphoid tissue. Conversely, autoantibody-mediated graft damage can trigger alloimmunity and the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies that can act in synergy to promote allograft rejection. Identification of the immunologic phenotypes of transplant recipients at risk of non-HLA antibody-mediated rejection, and the development of targeted therapies to treat such rejection, are sorely needed to improve both graft and patient survival.
Collapse
|
21
|
Pathogenesis of non-HLA antibodies in solid organ transplantation: Where do we stand? Hum Immunol 2016; 77:1055-1062. [PMID: 27237040 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcome. Pathogenic alloantibodies are usually directed against human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). Histological findings suggestive of ABMR usually demonstrate an anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA)-mediated injury, while a small subset of patients develop acute dysfunction with histological lesions suggestive of ABMR in the absence of anti-HLA DSAs. Although this non-HLA ABMR is not well recognized by current diagnostic classifications, it is associated with graft dysfunction and allograft loss. These clinical descriptions suggest a pathogenic role for non-HLA anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Diverse antigenic targets have been described during the last decade. This review discusses recent findings in the field and addresses the clinical relevance of anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs).
Collapse
|
22
|
Wang A, Sarwal MM. Computational Models for Transplant Biomarker Discovery. Front Immunol 2015; 6:458. [PMID: 26441963 PMCID: PMC4561798 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2015] [Accepted: 08/24/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Translational medicine offers a rich promise for improved diagnostics and drug discovery for biomedical research in the field of transplantation, where continued unmet diagnostic and therapeutic needs persist. Current advent of genomics and proteomics profiling called "omics" provides new resources to develop novel biomarkers for clinical routine. Establishing such a marker system heavily depends on appropriate applications of computational algorithms and software, which are basically based on mathematical theories and models. Understanding these theories would help to apply appropriate algorithms to ensure biomarker systems successful. Here, we review the key advances in theories and mathematical models relevant to transplant biomarker developments. Advantages and limitations inherent inside these models are discussed. The principles of key -computational approaches for selecting efficiently the best subset of biomarkers from high--dimensional omics data are highlighted. Prediction models are also introduced, and the integration of multi-microarray data is also discussed. Appreciating these key advances would help to accelerate the development of clinically reliable biomarker systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anyou Wang
- Department of Surgery, Division of MultiOrgan Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Minnie M. Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, Division of MultiOrgan Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Delville M, Sigdel TK, Wei C, Li J, Hsieh SC, Fornoni A, Burke GW, Bruneval P, Naesens M, Jackson A, Alachkar N, Canaud G, Legendre C, Anglicheau D, Reiser J, Sarwal MM. A circulating antibody panel for pretransplant prediction of FSGS recurrence after kidney transplantation. Sci Transl Med 2015; 6:256ra136. [PMID: 25273097 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3008538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS) after kidney transplantation is a cause of accelerated graft loss. To evaluate pathogenic antibodies (Abs) in rFSGS, we processed 141 serum samples from 64 patients with and without primary rFSGS and 34 non-FSGS control patients transplanted at four hospitals. We screened about 9000 antigens in pretransplant sera and selected 10 Abs targeting glomerular antigens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) validation. A panel of seven Abs (CD40, PTPRO, CGB5, FAS, P2RY11, SNRPB2, and APOL2) could predict posttransplant FSGS recurrence with 92% accuracy. Pretransplant elevation of anti-CD40 Ab alone had the best correlation (78% accuracy) with rFSGS risk after transplantation. Epitope mapping of CD40 with customized peptide arrays and rFSGS sera demonstrated altered immunogenicity of the extracellular CD40 domain in rFSGS. Immunohistochemistry of CD40 demonstrated a differential expression in FSGS compared to non-FSGS controls. Anti-CD40 Abs purified from rFSGS patients were particularly pathogenic in human podocyte cultures. Injection of anti-CD40/rFSGS Ab enhanced suPAR (soluble urokinase receptor)-mediated proteinuria in wild-type mice, yet no sensitizing effect was noted in mice deficient in CD40 or in wild-type mice that received blocking Ab to CD40. In conclusion, a panel of seven Abs can help identify primary FSGS patients at high risk of recurrence before transplantation. Intrarenal CD40 (and possibly other specific glomerular antigens) is an important contributor to FSGS disease pathogenesis. Human trials of anti-CD40 therapies are warranted to evaluate their efficacy for preventing rFSGS and improving graft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Delville
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U1171, Réseau Thématique de Recherche et de Soins Centaure, Labex Transplantex, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Tara K Sigdel
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Changli Wei
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Szu-Chuan Hsieh
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Alessia Fornoni
- Peggy and Harold Katz Family Drug Discovery Center, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - George W Burke
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Patrick Bruneval
- Department of Pathology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nada Alachkar
- Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Guillaume Canaud
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U1171, Réseau Thématique de Recherche et de Soins Centaure, Labex Transplantex, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U1171, Réseau Thématique de Recherche et de Soins Centaure, Labex Transplantex, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Department of Kidney Transplantation, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM U1171, Réseau Thématique de Recherche et de Soins Centaure, Labex Transplantex, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Jochen Reiser
- Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Division of Transplant Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management. Drugs 2015; 75:455-72. [DOI: 10.1007/s40265-015-0369-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
25
|
Woo SH, Sigdel TK, Dinh VT, Vu MT, Sarwal MM, Lafayette RA. Mapping novel immunogenic epitopes in IgA nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2014; 10:372-81. [PMID: 25542908 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02390314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES IgA plays a key role in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) by forming immune complexes and depositing in the glomeruli, leading to an inflammatory response. However, the antigenic targets and functional characterization of IgA have been incompletely defined in this disease. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS This study was performed in sera from patients who were studied as part of a prospective, observational study of IgAN. These patients (n=22) all had biopsy-proven IgAN within 3 years of study initiation, complete clinical data, annual urinary inulin clearance for GFRs, and at least 5 years of follow-up. Progression was defined as loss of >5 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year of inulin clearance measured over at least 5 years. A protein microarray was used for detection of IgAN-specific IgA autoantibodies in blood across approximately 9000 human antigens to specifically identify the most immunogenic protein targets that drive IgA antibodies in IgAN (n=22), healthy controls (n=10), and non-IgAN glomerular diseases (n=17). Results were validated by ELISA assays in sera and by immunohistochemistry in IgAN kidney biopsies. IgA-specific antibodies were correlated with clinical and histologic variables to assess their effect on disease progression and prognosis. RESULTS Fifty-four proteins mounted highly significant IgA antibody responses in patients with IgAN with a false discovery rate (q value) of ≤10%; 325 antibodies (P≤0.05) were increased overall. Antitissue transglutaminase IgA was significantly elevated in IgAN (P<0.001, q value of 0%). IgA antibodies to DDX4 (r=-0.55, P=0.01) and ZADH2 (r=-0.48, P=0.02) were significantly correlated with the decline of renal function. Specific IgA autoantibodies are elevated in IgAN compared with normal participants and those with other glomerular diseases. CONCLUSIONS In this preliminary study, IgA autoantibodies target novel proteins, highly expressed in the kidney glomerulus and tubules. These IgA autoantibodies may play important roles in the pathogenesis of IgAN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hoon Woo
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tara K Sigdel
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Van T Dinh
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Minh-Thien Vu
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Minnie M Sarwal
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California;
| | - Richard A Lafayette
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Transplant glomerulopathy: the interaction of HLA antibodies and endothelium. J Immunol Res 2014; 2014:549315. [PMID: 24741606 PMCID: PMC3987972 DOI: 10.1155/2014/549315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2013] [Revised: 01/29/2014] [Accepted: 01/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is a major cause of chronic graft dysfunction without effective therapy. Although the histological definition of TG is well characterized, the pathophysiological pathways leading to TG development are still poorly understood. Electron microscopy suggests an earlier appearance of TG and suggests that endothelial cell injury is the first sign of the disease. The pathogenic role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in endothelial cells has been described in acute vascular and humoral rejection. However the mechanisms and pathways of endothelial cell injury by HLA antibodies remain unclear. Despite the description of different causes of the morphological lesion of TG (hepatitis, thrombotic microangiopathy), the strong link between TG and chronic antibody mediated rejection suggests a major role for HLA antibodies in TG formation. In this review, we describe the effect of classes I or II HLA-antibodies in TG and especially the implication of donor specific antibodies (DSA). We update recent studies about endothelial cells and try to explain the different signals and intracellular pathways involved in the progression of TG.
Collapse
|
27
|
Cibrik DM, Warner RL, Kommareddi M, Song P, Luan FL, Johnson KJ. Identification of a protein signature in renal allograft rejection. Proteomics Clin Appl 2013; 7:839-49. [PMID: 24323459 DOI: 10.1002/prca.201200036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2012] [Revised: 06/07/2013] [Accepted: 06/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Serum creatinine functions as a poor surrogate marker of renal allograft dysfunction and long-term graft survival. By measuring multiple proteins simultaneously in the serum of transplant patients, we can identify unique protein signatures of graft dysfunction. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We utilized training and validation cohorts composed of healthy and volunteer subjects, stable renal transplant patients, and renal transplant patients experiencing acute allograft rejection. Utilizing our antibody microarray, we measured 108 proteins simultaneously in these groups. RESULTS Using Mann-Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction, we identified ten serum proteins from 19 renal transplant patients with stable renal function, which are differentially expressed, compared to healthy control subjects. In addition, we identified 17 proteins that differentiate rejecting renal transplant recipients from stable renal transplant. Validation cohorts substantiated these findings. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE Our preliminary results support that a specific pattern of protein expression or "protein signature" may be able to differentiate between stable transplant patients from those with rejection. Future studies will focus on other etiologies of renal allograft dysfunction and the effect of treatment on protein expression and long-term outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane M Cibrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sigdel TK, Sarwal MM. Moving beyond HLA: a review of nHLA antibodies in organ transplantation. Hum Immunol 2013; 74:1486-90. [PMID: 23876683 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2013.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 07/02/2013] [Accepted: 07/09/2013] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Given the finite graft life expectancy of HLA identical organ transplants and the recognition of humoral graft injury in the absence of donor directed anti-HLA antibodies, the clinical impact of antibodies against non-HLA (nHLA) antigens in transplant injury is being increasingly recognized. The recognition of the impact of nHLA antigen discrepancies between donor and recipient on transplant outcomes is timely given the advances in rapid and lower cost sequencing methods that can soon provide complete maps of all recipient and donor HLA and nHLA mismatch data. In this review, we present a summary of recent reports evaluating the role of nHLA antibodies and their relevance to the field of organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- California Pacific Medical Center, Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Tailoring immunosuppressive drugs to an individual's needs is crucial to improve long-term outcomes of organ transplant patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the data on promising biomarkers able to detect the risk of acute or chronic rejection and to discuss the potential issues for their implementation in the clinic. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple publications have indicated that circulating antibodies targeting human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antigens as well as donor-specific memory T cells are associated with accelerated graft failure. Other studies published within the year show that specific genomic and proteomic signatures obtained from urine, blood, and graft tissue correlate with acute rejection in kidney and heart transplant patients. SUMMARY The development of reliable biomarkers is crucial for individualizing therapy aimed at extending allograft survival and improving patient health. Emerging data indicate that monitoring assays, likely used in panels, have the potential to be diagnostic and possibly predictive of long-term outcome. In addition to ongoing discovery efforts, progress in the field will require multicenter validation, assay standardization, and commercialization so as to efficiently deliver reliable testing strategies to the practicing clinician.
Collapse
|
30
|
Chaudhuri A, Ozawa M, Everly MJ, Ettenger R, Dharnidharka V, Benfield M, Mathias R, Portale A, McDonald R, Harmon W, Kershaw D, Vehaskari VM, Kamil E, Baluarte HJ, Warady B, Li L, Sigdel TK, Hsieh SC, Dai H, Naesens M, Waskerwitz J, Salvatierra O, Terasaki PI, Sarwal MM. The clinical impact of humoral immunity in pediatric renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24:655-64. [PMID: 23449533 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2012070663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of anti-donor humoral responses after transplantation associates with higher risks for acute rejection and 1-year graft survival in adults, but the influence of humoral immunity on transplant outcomes in children is not well understood. Here, we studied the evolution of humoral immunity in low-risk pediatric patients during the first 2 years after renal transplantation. Using data from 130 pediatric renal transplant patients randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression in the NIH-SNSO1 trial, we correlated the presence of serum anti-HLA antibodies to donor HLA antigens (donor-specific antibodies) and serum MHC class 1-related chain A (MICA) antibody with both clinical outcomes and histology identified on protocol biopsies at 0, 6, 12, and 24 months. We detected de novo antibodies after transplant in 24% (23% of SF group and 25% of SB group), most often after the first year. Overall, 22% developed anti-HLA antibodies, of which 6% were donor-specific antibodies, and 6% developed anti-MICA antibody. Presence of these antibodies de novo associated with significantly higher risks for acute rejection (P=0.02), chronic graft injury (P=0.02), and decline in graft function (P=0.02). In summary, antibodies to HLA and MICA antigens appear in approximately 25% of unsensitized pediatric patients, placing them at greater risk for acute and chronic rejection with accelerated loss of graft function. Avoiding steroids does not seem to modify this incidence. Whether serial assessments of these antibodies after transplant could guide individual tailoring of immunosuppression requires additional study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abanti Chaudhuri
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sigdel TK, Sarwal MM. Discovery and customized validation of antibody targets by protein arrays and indirect ELISA. Methods Mol Biol 2013; 1034:373-384. [PMID: 23775752 PMCID: PMC4476239 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-493-7_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Because of our access to human genome data and ever improving genome sequencing and proteome analysis methods we are much better in terms of our understanding of biological processes. In addition to genomics, proteomics, and other "omics" methods, availability of more sophisticated molecular assaying methods have augmented our knowledge about immune processes towards autogeneic and allogeneic targets. High-density protein arrays are developed to analyze protein-small molecule interactions, enzyme-substrate profiling, protein-protein interaction, and immune monitoring by assessing antibodies in the serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- California Pacific Medical Center-Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sigdel TK, Gao X, Sarwal MM. Protein and peptide biomarkers in organ transplantation. Biomark Med 2012; 6:259-71. [PMID: 22731899 DOI: 10.2217/bmm.12.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Organ transplantation is the optimal treatment choice for end-stage organ failure in pediatric patients. The ideal maintenance of a transplanted organ requires efficient monitoring tools and an effective individualized post-transplant treatment plan. Currently available post-transplant monitoring options are not ideal because of their invasiveness or their lack of sensitivity and specificity when providing an accurate assessment of transplant injury. Current research on proteins and peptides, including mass spectrometry-based proteomics, can identify novel surrogate protein and peptide biomarkers that can assist in monitoring the graft in order to correctly assess the status of the transplanted organ. In this article, we have critically reviewed current relevant literature to highlight the importance of protein and peptide biomarkers in the field of pediatric organ transplantation, the status of research findings in the field of protein and peptide biomarkers in different organ transplantation and factors that impact and inhibit the progression of protein biomarker discovery in the field of solid-organ transplantation in pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- California Pacific Medical Center - Research Institute, San Francisco, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dragun D, Philippe A, Catar R. Role of non-HLA antibodies in organ transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2012; 17:440-5. [DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e328355f12b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
34
|
Huber L, Lachmann N, Dürr M, Matz M, Liefeldt L, Neumayer HH, Schönemann C, Budde K. Identification and Therapeutic Management of Highly Sensitized Patients Undergoing Renal Transplantation. Drugs 2012; 72:1335-54. [DOI: 10.2165/11631110-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
35
|
Sigdel TK, Woo SH, Dai H, Khatri P, Li L, Myers B, Sarwal MM, Lafayette RA. Profiling of autoantibodies in IgA nephropathy, an integrative antibiomics approach. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 6:2775-84. [PMID: 22157707 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04600511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES IgG commonly co-exists with IgA in the glomerular mesangium of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) with unclear clinical relevance. Autoantibody (autoAb) biomarkers to detect and track progression of IgAN are an unmet clinical need. The objective of the study was to identify IgA-specific autoAbs specific to IgAN. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS High-density protein microarrays were evaluated IgG autoAbs in the serum of IgAN patients (n = 22) and controls (n = 10). Clinical parameters, including annual GFR and urine protein measurements, were collected on all patients over 5 years. Bioinformatic data analysis was performed to select targets for further validation by immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS One hundred seventeen (1.4%) specific antibodies were increased in IgAN. Among the most significant were the autoAb to the Ig family of proteins. IgAN-specific autoAbs (approximately 50%) were mounted against proteins predominantly expressed in glomeruli and tubules, and selected candidates were verified by IHC. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of our study demonstrated that IgG autoAb levels (matriline 2, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2W, DEAD box protein, and protein kinase D1) might be used in combination with 24-hour proteinuria to improve prediction of the progression of IgAN (area under the curve = 0.86, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS IgAN is associated with elevated IgG autoAbs to multiple proteins in the kidney. This first analysis of the repertoire of autoAbs in IgAN identifies novel, immunogenic protein targets that are highly expressed in the kidney glomerulus and tubules that may bear relevance in the pathogenesis and progression of IgAN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- Departments of Pediatrics-Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sigdel TK, Li L, Tran TQ, Khatri P, Naesens M, Sansanwal P, Dai H, Hsieh SC, Sarwal MM. Non-HLA antibodies to immunogenic epitopes predict the evolution of chronic renal allograft injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2012; 23:750-63. [PMID: 22302197 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2011060596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic allograft injury (CAI) results from a humoral response to mismatches in immunogenic epitopes between the donor and recipient. Although alloantibodies against HLA antigens contribute to the pathogenesis of CAI, alloantibodies against non-HLA antigens likely contribute as well. Here, we used high-density protein arrays to identify non-HLA antibodies in CAI and subsequently validated a subset in a cohort of 172 serum samples collected serially post-transplantation. There were 38 de novo non-HLA antibodies that significantly associated with the development of CAI (P<0.01) on protocol post-transplant biopsies, with enrichment of their corresponding antigens in the renal cortex. Baseline levels of preformed antibodies to MIG (also called CXCL9), ITAC (also called CXCL11), IFN-γ, and glial-derived neurotrophic factor positively correlated with histologic injury at 24 months. Measuring levels of these four antibodies could help clinicians predict the development of CAI with >80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In conclusion, pretransplant serum levels of a defined panel of alloantibodies targeting non-HLA immunogenic antigens associate with histologic CAI in the post-transplant period. Validation in a larger, prospective transplant cohort may lead to a noninvasive method to predict and monitor for CAI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5208, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sokolove J, Lindstrom TM, Robinson WH. Development and deployment of antigen arrays for investigation of B-cell fine specificity in autoimmune disease. Front Biosci (Elite Ed) 2012; 4:320-30. [PMID: 22201874 PMCID: PMC3404510 DOI: 10.2741/379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Recent developments in proteomic technologies have enabled the high-throughput, multiplex measurement of large panels of antibodies in biological fluids of patients with immune-driven diseases. Antigen microarrays are increasingly being used to delineate the natural history of autoantibody formation and epitope spread, and thus gain insight into the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases, as well as into host immunity and its shortcomings. Characterization of autoimmunity that precedes the onset of clinically apparent disease has the potential to guide disease prevention using either conventional immunosupression or novel, antigen-specific tolerizing therapies. In addition, autoantibody profiling has the potential to identify molecular subtypes of a disease, which could allow for prediction of disease outcomes such as severity, tissue damage, and response to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Sokolove
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA, and Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Tamsin M. Lindstrom
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA, and Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - William H. Robinson
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA, and Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Roedder S, Vitalone M, Khatri P, Sarwal MM. Biomarkers in solid organ transplantation: establishing personalized transplantation medicine. Genome Med 2011; 3:37. [PMID: 21658299 PMCID: PMC3218811 DOI: 10.1186/gm253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in molecular and in silico research have enabled significant progress towards personalized transplantation medicine. It is now possible to conduct comprehensive biomarker development studies of transplant organ pathologies, correlating genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic information from donor and recipient with clinical and histological phenotypes. Translation of these advances to the clinical setting will allow assessment of an individual patient's risk of allograft damage or accommodation. Transplantation biomarkers are needed for active monitoring of immunosuppression, to reduce patient morbidity, and to improve long-term allograft function and life expectancy. Here, we highlight recent pre- and post-transplantation biomarkers of acute and chronic allograft damage or adaptation, focusing on peripheral blood-based methodologies for non-invasive application. We then critically discuss current findings with respect to their future application in routine clinical transplantation medicine. Complement-system-associated SNPs present potential biomarkers that may be used to indicate the baseline risk for allograft damage prior to transplantation. The detection of antibodies against novel, non-HLA, MICA antigens, and the expression of cytokine genes and proteins and cytotoxicity-related genes have been correlated with allograft damage and are potential post-transplantation biomarkers indicating allograft damage at the molecular level, although these do not have clinical relevance yet. Several multi-gene expression-based biomarker panels have been identified that accurately predicted graft accommodation in liver transplant recipients and may be developed into a predictive biomarker assay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Roedder
- Department of Pediatrics and Immunology, Stanford University, G306 300 Pasteur Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dinavahi R, George A, Tretin A, Akalin E, Ames S, Bromberg JS, Deboccardo G, Dipaola N, Lerner SM, Mehrotra A, Murphy BT, Nadasdy T, Paz-Artal E, Salomon DR, Schröppel B, Sehgal V, Sachidanandam R, Heeger PS. Antibodies reactive to non-HLA antigens in transplant glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22:1168-78. [PMID: 21566057 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2010111183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Although T and B cell alloimmunity contribute to transplant injury, autoimmunity directed at kidney-expressed, non-HLA antigens may also participate. Because the specificity, prevalence, and importance of antibodies to non-HLA antigens in late allograft injury are poorly characterized, we used a protein microarray to compare antibody repertoires in pre- and post-transplant sera from several cohorts of patients with and without transplant glomerulopathy. Transplantation routinely induced changes in antibody repertoires, but we did not identify any de novo non-HLA antibodies common to patients with transplant glomerulopathy. The screening studies identified three reactivities present before transplantation that persisted after transplant and strongly associated with transplant glomerulopathy. ELISA confirmed that reactivity against peroxisomal-trans-2-enoyl-coA-reductase strongly associated with the development of transplant glomerulopathy in independent validation sets. In addition to providing insight into effects of transplantation on non-HLA antibody repertoires, these results suggest that pretransplant serum antibodies to peroxisomal-trans-2-enoyl-coA-reductase may predict prognosis in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajani Dinavahi
- Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sigdel TK, Lee S, Sarwal MM. Profiling the proteome in renal transplantation. Proteomics Clin Appl 2011; 5:269-80. [PMID: 21520424 DOI: 10.1002/prca.201000117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2010] [Revised: 02/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/22/2011] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Improved monitoring of transplanted solid organs is one of the next crucial steps leading to an increase in both patient and allograft survival. This can be facilitated through one or a set of surrogate biomarker molecules that accurately and precisely indicate the health status of the transplanted organ. Recent developments in the field of high throughput "omic" methods including genomics and proteomics have facilitated robust and comprehensive analysis of genes and proteins. This development has stimulated efforts in the identification of effective and clinically applicable gene and protein biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, including kidney transplantation. Some achievements have been made through proteomics in terms of profiling proteins and identification of potential biomarkers. However, the road to a successful biomarker discovery and its clinical implementation has proved to be challenging, requiring a number of key issues to be addressed. Such issues are: the lack of widely accepted protocols, difficulty in sample processing and transportation and a lack of collaborative efforts to achieve significant sample sizes in clinical studies. In this review using our area of expertise, we describe the current strategies used for proteomic-based biomarker discovery in renal transplantation, discuss inherent issues associated with these efforts and propose better strategies for successful biomarker discovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara K Sigdel
- Department of Pediatrics - Nephrology, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Clatworthy MR, Espeli M, Torpey N, Smith KGC. The generation and maintenance of serum alloantibody. Curr Opin Immunol 2011; 22:669-81. [PMID: 20932734 DOI: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2010] [Accepted: 08/31/2010] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) mediate hyperacute and acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which can lead to early graft damage and loss, and are also associated with chronic AMR and reduced long-term graft survival. Such alloantibodies can be generated by previous exposure to major histocompatibility (MHC) antigens (usually via blood transfusions, previous allografts or pregnancy) or can occur de novo after transplantation. Recent studies also suggest that non-MHC antibodies, including those recognising major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA), MICB, vimentin, angiotensin II type I receptor may also have an adverse impact on allograft outcomes. In this review, we consider how the dose, route and context of antigen exposure influences DSA induction and describe factors which control the generation, maintenance and survival of alloantibody-producing plasma cells. Finally, we discuss the implications of these variables on therapeutic approaches to DSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Clatworthy
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, CB2 0XY, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Butte AJ, Sigdel TK, Wadia PP, Miklos DB, Sarwal MM. Protein microarrays discover angiotensinogen and PRKRIP1 as novel targets for autoantibodies in chronic renal disease. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010; 10:M110.000497. [PMID: 21183621 DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m110.000497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Biomarkers for early detection of chronic kidney disease are needed, as millions of patients suffer from chronic diseases predisposing them to kidney failure. Protein microarrays may also hold utility in the discovery of auto-antibodies in other conditions not commonly considered auto-immune diseases. We hypothesized that proteins are released as a consequence of damage at a cellular level during end-organ damage from renal injury, not otherwise recognized as self-antigens, and an adaptive humoral immune response to these proteins might be detected in the blood, as a noninvasive tracker of this injury. The resultant antibodies (Ab) detected in the blood would serve as effective biomarkers for occult renal injury, enabling earlier clinical detection of chronic kidney disease than currently possible, because of the redundancy of the serum creatinine as a biomarker for early kidney injury. To screen for novel autoantibodies in chronic kidney disease, 24 protein microarrays were used to compare serum Ab from patients with chronic kidney disease against matched controls. From a panel of 38 antigens with increased Ab binding, four were validated in 71 individuals, with (n=50) and without (n=21) renal insufficiency. Significant elevations in the titer of novel auto-Ab were noted against angiotensinogen and PRKRIP1 in renal insufficiency. Current validation is underway to evaluate if these auto-Ab can provide means to follow the evolution of chronic kidney disease in patients with early stages of renal insufficiency, and if these rising titers of these auto-Ab correlate with the rate of progression of chronic kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atul J Butte
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Li L, Sigdel T, Vitalone M, Lee SH, Sarwal M. Differential Immunogenicity and Clinical Relevance of Kidney Compartment Specific Antigens after Renal Transplantation. J Proteome Res 2010; 9:6715-21. [DOI: 10.1021/pr1008674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Li Li
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94304, United States
| | - Tara Sigdel
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94304, United States
| | - Matthew Vitalone
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94304, United States
| | - Sang Ho Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94304, United States
| | - Minnie Sarwal
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California 94304, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of the Stable Kidney Transplant and Chronic Transplant Injury Using the ProtoArray® Technology. Transplant Proc 2010; 42:3475-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2010] [Accepted: 09/07/2010] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
46
|
Abstract
The past few decades are characterized by an explosive evolution of genetics and molecular cell biology. Advances in chemistry and engineering have enabled increased data throughput, permitting the study of complete sets of molecules with increasing speed and accuracy using techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. Prediction of long-term outcomes in transplantation is hampered by the absence of sufficiently robust biomarkers and a lack of adequate insight into the mechanisms of acute and chronic alloimmune injury and the adaptive mechanisms of immunological quiescence that may support transplantation tolerance. Here, we discuss some of the great opportunities that molecular diagnostic tools have to offer both basic scientists and translational researchers for bench-to-bedside clinical application in transplantation medicine, with special focus on genomics and genome-wide association studies, epigenetics (DNA methylation and histone modifications), gene expression studies and transcriptomics (including microRNA and small interfering RNA studies), proteomics and peptidomics, antibodyomics, metabolomics, chemical genomics and functional imaging with nanoparticles. We address the challenges and opportunities associated with the newer high-throughput sequencing technologies, especially in the field of bioinformatics and biostatistics, and demonstrate the importance of integrative approaches. Although this Review focuses on transplantation research and clinical transplantation, the concepts addressed are valid for all translational research.
Collapse
|
47
|
Patients with drug-free long-term graft function display increased numbers of peripheral B cells with a memory and inhibitory phenotype. Kidney Int 2010; 78:503-13. [PMID: 20531452 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Several transplant patients maintain stable kidney graft function in the absence of immunosuppression. Here we compared the characteristics of their peripheral B cells to that of others who had stable graft function but were under pharmacologic immunosuppression, to patients with chronic rejection and to healthy volunteers. In drug-free long-term graft function (DF) there was a significant increase in both absolute cell number and frequency of total B cells; particularly activated, memory and early memory B cells. These increased B-cell numbers were associated with a significantly enriched transcriptional B-cell profile. Costimulatory/migratory molecules (B7-2/CD80, CD40, and CD62L) were upregulated in B cells; particularly in memory CD19(+)IgD(-)CD38(+/-)CD27(+) B cells in these patients. Their purified B cells, however, responded normally to a polyclonal stimulation and did not have cytokine polarization. This phenotype was associated with the following specific characteristics which include an inhibitory signal (decreased FcgammaRIIA/FcgammaRIIB ratio); a preventive signal of hyperactive B-cell response (an increase in BANK1, which negatively modulates CD40-mediated AKT activation); an increased number of B cells expressing CD1d and CD5; an increased BAFF-R/BAFF ratio that could explain why these patients have more peripheral B cells; and a specific autoantibody profile. Thus, our findings show that patients with DF have a particular blood B-cell phenotype that may contribute to the maintenance of long-term graft function.
Collapse
|
48
|
In brief. Nat Rev Nephrol 2010. [DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2009.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
49
|
Goebel JWD. Protein kinase Czeta: not-so-innocent bystander or unusual suspect in kidney transplant rejection? Kidney Int 2009; 76:1223-4. [PMID: 19946312 DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Antibodies against non-HLA targets are increasingly recognized in the context of transplant rejection. However, their specific role remains largely elusive, as evidence exists supporting both their occurrence as an epiphenomenon and their actual pathogenicity in the rejection process. Sutherland et al. describe protein kinase Czeta as a novel, non-HLA antigenic target in the setting of graft rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens W D Goebel
- Nephrology and Hypertension Section, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229-3039, USA.
| |
Collapse
|