Mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression with sirolimus in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled Spare-the-Nephron trial

Costimulation blockade: the next generation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are central to immunosuppression in kidney transplantation (KT), improving short-term outcomes but falling short in enhancing long-term outcomes due to cardiovascular, metabolic, and renal complications. Belatacept, an FDA-approved costimulation blocker, offers a less toxic alternative to CNIs but is limited by its intravenous administration and reduced efficacy in high-immunological-risk patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging therapies target more specific pathways to improve efficacy and accessibility. Abatacept, a first-generation cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) immunoglobulin, has shown favorable outcomes in small studies. VEL-101 and Lulizumab selectively block CD28 while preserving CTLA-4 signaling, showing promise in early trials. In the CD40/CD40L pathway, results have been mixed. Iscalimab (CD40 antibody) was inferior to tacrolimus in Phase 2 trials, and Bleselumab (CD40 antibody) showed variable rejection rates despite being noninferior to tacrolimus. CD40L-targeting agents such as TNX-1500, Tegoprubart, and Dazodalibep have demonstrated promising efficacy and safety in rejection prophylaxis.

SUMMARY

The focus in transplantation is shifting toward safer, long-term therapies with greater accessibility. Investigational agents with subcutaneous delivery methods could overcome logistical challenges, improve adherence, and redefine posttransplant care. These advancements in costimulation blockade may enhance long-term graft survival and transform the management of KT recipients.

Immunosuppressive drug combinations after kidney transplantation and post-transplant diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation (KT). This systematic review investigated the effect of different immunosuppressive regimens on the risk of PTDM. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included KT recipients with any immunosuppression and reported PTDM outcomes up to 1 October 2023. The analysis included 125 RCTs. We found no differences in PTDM risk within induction therapies. In de novo KT, there was an increased risk of developing PTDM with tacrolimus versus cyclosporin (RR 1.71, 95%CI [1.38-2.11]). No differences were observed between tacrolimus+mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) and tacrolimus+MMF/MPA, but there was a tendency towards a higher risk of PTDM in the cyclosporin+mTORi group (RR 1.42, 95%CI [0.99-2.04]). Conversion from cyclosporin to an mTORi increased PTDM risk (RR 1.89, 95%CI [1.18-3.03]). De novo belatacept compared with a calcineurin inhibitor resulted in 50% lower risk of PTDM (RR 0.50, 95%CI [0.32-0.79]). Steroid avoidance resulted in 31% lower PTDM risk (RR 0.69, 95%CI [0.57-0.83]), whereas steroid withdrawal resulted in no differences. Immunosuppression should be decided on an individual basis, carefully weighing the risk of future PTDM and rejection.

A review of landmark studies on maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation

Immunosuppressive medications play a pivotal role in kidney transplantation, and the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), including cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC), are considered as the backbone of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens. Since the introduction of CNIs in kidney transplantation, the incidence of acute rejection has decreased, and allograft survival has improved significantly. However, CNI nephrotoxicity has been a major concern, believed to heavily impact long-term allograft survival and function. To address this concern, several CNI-sparing regimens were developed and studied in randomized, controlled, clinical trials, aiming to reduce CNI exposure and preserve long-term allograft function. However, more recent information has revealed that CNI nephrotoxicity is not the primary cause of late allograft failure, and its histopathology is neither specific nor pathognomonic. In this review, we discuss the historical development of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens in kidney transplantation, covering the early era of transplantation, the CNI-sparing era, and the current era where the alloimmune response, rather than CNI nephrotoxicity, appears to be the major contributor to late allograft failure. Our goal is to provide a chronological overview of the development of maintenance immunosuppressive regimens and summarize the most recent information for clinicians caring for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Calcineurin and mTOR inhibitors in kidney transplantation: integrative metamodeling on transplant survival and kidney function

In our study, we examined the efficacy of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors, specifically rapamycin (Rap), compared to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in kidney transplantation. By conducting a comprehensive search across reputable databases (EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and Crossref), we gathered data for a six-month post-transplantation period. Our analysis revealed that mTOR inhibitor administration resulted in improved glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serum creatinine levels. However, it is important to note that the mTOR inhibitor group had a higher incidence of acute rejection after biopsy. Through molecular modeling, we observed that Rap exhibited a superior binding affinity for mTOR compared to CNIs' binding to calcineurin, probably contributing to the transplant rejection. Our meta-analysis supports the cautious use of an optimal mTOR inhibitor in conjunction with careful consideration of clinical features when minimizing CNIs early in the transplantation process. This is because mTOR inhibitors have complementary mechanisms of action, a low nephrotoxicity profile, and favorable outcomes in serum creatinine and GFR, which contribute to improved transplant survival.

Rapamycin treatment induces tubular proteinuria: role of megalin-mediated protein reabsorption

Introduction: Rapamycin is an immunosuppressor that acts by inhibiting the serine/threonine kinase mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1. Therapeutic use of rapamycin is limited by its adverse effects. Proteinuria is an important marker of kidney damage and a risk factor for kidney diseases progression and has been reported in patients and animal models treated with rapamycin. However, the mechanism underlying proteinuria induced by rapamycin is still an open matter. In this work, we investigated the effects of rapamycin on parameters of renal function and structure and on protein handling by proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTECs). Methods: Healthy BALB/c mice were treated with 1.5 mg/kg rapamycin by oral gavage for 1, 3, or 7 days. At the end of each treatment, the animals were kept in metabolic cages and renal function and structural parameters were analyzed. LLC-PK1 cell line was used as a model of PTECs to test specific effect of rapamycin. Results: Rapamycin treatment did not change parameters of glomerular structure and function. Conversely, there was a transient increase in 24-h proteinuria, urinary protein to creatinine ratio (UPCr), and albuminuria in the groups treated with rapamycin. In accordance with these findings, rapamycin treatment decreased albumin-fluorescein isothiocyanate uptake in the renal cortex. This effect was associated with reduced brush border expression and impaired subcellular distribution of megalin in PTECs. The effect of rapamycin seems to be specific for albumin endocytosis machinery because it did not modify renal sodium handling or (Na⁺+K⁺)ATPase activity in BALB/c mice and in the LLC-PK1 cell line. A positive Pearson correlation was found between megalin expression and albumin uptake while an inverse correlation was shown between albumin uptake and UPCr or 24-h proteinuria. Despite its effect on albumin handling in PTECs, rapamycin treatment did not induce tubular injury measured by interstitial space and collagen deposition. Conclusion: These findings suggest that proteinuria induced by rapamycin could have a tubular rather than a glomerular origin. This effect involves a specific change in protein endocytosis machinery. Our results open new perspectives on understanding the undesired effect of proteinuria generated by rapamycin.

Risks and ways of preventing kidney dysfunction in drug-induced immunosuppression in solid organ recipients

Immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) is the cornerstone of treatment after transplantation. The goal of immunosuppression is to prevent acute and chronic rejection while maximizing patient survival and long-term graft function. However, the expected effects of IMT must be balanced against the major adverse effects of these drugs and their toxicity. The purpose of this review is to summarize world experience on current immunosuppressive strategies and to assess their effects on renal function.

Kidney Disease after Heart and Lung Transplantation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not only common after lung and heart transplantation but also is associated with increased morbidity and mortality due to multiple pre-, peri- and post-transplant factors. While the exact incidence of CKD in this population is not well-defined, it seems to have gradually increased over the years as older recipients are more frequently considered. The increasing success of the procedure and expanding transplant candidate pool has allowed many with comorbid conditions to receive a transplant, which was considered prohibitive in the past. This review presents risk factors that have been linked to CKD as well as interventions that may help alleviate this serious problem. The impact of pretransplant renal function and the overexaggerated role of chronic nephrotoxicity of calcineurin inhibitors is discussed in detail. Until the exact pathophysiology of kidney disease is better understood, there is a dire need to expand the research agenda beyond observational studies.

Allograft Function as Endpoint for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation

Clinical study endpoints that assess the efficacy of interventions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency can be adopted for use in kidney transplantation trials, given the pathophysiological similarities between both conditions. Kidney dysfunction is reflected in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and although a predefined (e.g., 50%) reduction in GFR was recommended as an endpoint by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016, many other endpoints are also included in clinical trials. End-stage renal disease is strongly associated with a change in estimated (e)GFR, and eGFR trajectories or slopes are increasingly used as endpoints in clinical intervention trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar approaches could be considered for clinical trials in kidney transplantation, although several factors should be taken into account. The present Consensus Report was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the EMA in 2020. This paper provides a contemporary discussion of primary endpoints used in clinical trials involving CKD, including proteinuria and albuminuria, and evaluates the validity of these concepts as endpoints for clinical trials in kidney transplantation.

Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitors to Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs).

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the continuation of CNI with conversion to mTORi therapy.

Results

Twenty-nine RCTs (5,747 KTRs) were included in our analysis. Meta-analysis of the glomerular filtration rate (SMD 0.20; 95%CI 0.10-0.31; P<0.01) and malignancy (RR 0.74; 95%CI 0.55-0.99; P=0.04) demonstrated a significant advantage of mTORi conversion over CNI continuation. However, the risk of acute rejection (RR 1.58; 95%CI 1.22-2.04; P<0.01), infection (RR 1.55; 95%CI 1.01-1.31; P=0.04), proteinuria (RR 1.87; 95%CI 1.34-2.59; P<0.01), leukopenia (RR 1.56; 95%CI 1.27-1.91; P<0.01), acne (RR 6.43; 95%CI 3.43-12.04; P<0.01), and mouth ulcer (RR 11.70; 95%CI 6.18-22.17; P<0.01) were higher in the mTORi group. More patients in the conversion group had to discontinue study medication (RR 2.52; 95%CI 1.75-3.63; P<0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to death, graft loss, diabetes, chronic allograft nephropathy, and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy.

Conclusions

Posttransplant patients have a better graft function and lower incidence of malignancy after conversion from CNI to mTORi therapy. However, this conversion strategy may be prevented by the higher drug discontinuation rate due to mTORi-associated adverse events, such as more acute rejection, infection, proteinuria, leukopenia, acne, and mouth ulcer, indicating that conversion therapy may only be a treatment option in selected patients.

5-Year outcomes of the prospective and randomized CISTCERT study comparing steroid withdrawal to replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus in de novo kidney transplant patients

Withdrawal of either steroids or calcineurin inhibitors are two strategies to reduce treatment-related side effects and improve long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation. The CISTCERT study compared the efficacy and safety of these two strategies. In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 151 incident kidney transplant recipients received cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolic acid (MPA), and steroids during three months, followed by either steroid withdrawal (CsA/MPA) or replacement of cyclosporine with everolimus (EVL) (EVL/MPA/steroids). 5-year patient survival (89% vs. 86%; P = NS) and death-censored graft survival (95% vs. 96%; P = NS) were comparable in the CsA/MPA and EVL/MPA/steroids arm, respectively. ⁵¹ CrEDTA clearance was comparable in the intention-to-treat analysis, but in the on-treatment population, the EVL/MPA/steroids arm exhibited a superior ⁵¹ CrEDTA clearance at 1 and 5 years after transplantation (61.6 vs. 52.4, P = 0.05 and 59.1 vs. 46.2ml/min/1.73 m² , P = 0.042). Numerically more and more severe rejections were observed in the EVL/MPA/steroids arm, which also experienced a higher incidence of posttransplant diabetes (26% vs. 6%, P = 0.0016) and infections. No significant differences were observed in cardiovascular outcomes and malignancy. Both regimens provide an excellent long-term patient survival and graft survival. Regarding graft function, EVL/MPA/steroids is an attractive strategy for patients with good tolerability who remain free of rejection. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00903188; EudraCT Number 2007-005844-26).

Determinants of Successful Use of Sirolimus in Renal Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is an established immunosuppressant in renal transplantation with antineoplastic and antiviral features, but side effects like proteinuria limit its use. The aim of this retrospective multicenter observational study is to define predictors for determining which patients most likely benefit from a sirolimus-based therapy.

METHODS

All patients from 10 German centers that were switched to a sirolimus-containing maintenance immunosuppression in 2000 to 2008 after 3 months or later post-transplantation were enrolled (n = 726). Observation times after switching to sirolimus ranged from 4 days to 9 years (median: 24.3 months). With multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for the endpoints terminal graft failure and withdrawal of sirolimus therapy compared to successful therapy were identified.

RESULTS

Successful sirolimus therapy was observed in 304 patients. Forty patients died with functioning graft. Therapy failures included graft loss (n = 106) and sirolimus-discontinuation for various reasons (n = 276). Successful sirolimus-use was predicted in 83% and graft failure in 65%, whereas prediction of deliberate sirolimus-discontinuation was poor (48%). Most favorable results for sirolimus-use were observed in patients switched in 2006 to 2008. Using ROC analysis, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 32 mL/min was shown to be the cut-off in patients withdrawing from therapy as a result of renal reasons, as well as in patients with graft loss. Proteinuria above 151 mg/L was shown to be predictive for patients with graft failure.

CONCLUSIONS

eGFR and proteinuria are the major determinants for successful sirolimus-therapy. Our findings help stratifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy and avoid toxicities in patients without potential benefits for this therapy.

Adverse Events and Discontinuation Rates Associated with Sirolimus Treatment in Adult Renal Transplant Patients in Latin America vs Non-Latin American Countries

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus is approved for prophylaxis of organ rejection following renal transplantation. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) leading to sirolimus discontinuation differ geographically.

METHODS

Rates of TEAEs, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuations were evaluated in 3 clinical trials of conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus. Posttransplantation, patients were treated over 4 years (study 1), over 1 year (study 2), and over 2 years (study 3). TEAEs, SAEs, and discontinuation rates were compared between Latin America (LATAM) vs North America (NA) and Europe/rest of world (EU/ROW). Data from studies 2 and 3, with similar times to conversion, were pooled.

RESULTS

Study 1 comprised 551 patients (LATAM, n=189); studies 2/3 comprised 395 (LATAM, n=111). LATAM patients were significantly younger than NA or EU/ROW patients in study 1 and studies 2/3 (P < .0001), with a lower proportion of white patients and higher proportion of patients of other races in LATAM vs NA (P < .0001) and EU/ROW (P = .02) groups. Almost all patients reported TEAEs. Discontinuation because of medical events was significantly lower (P < .05) in LATAM vs NA or EU/ROW. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were more common, and anemia and peripheral edema less common in LATAM; diarrhea and proteinuria did not differ by region. Types of AEs leading to discontinuation did not differ by region.

CONCLUSION

LATAM renal transplant recipients converted to sirolimus were more likely to remain on therapy than patients in other regions.

Everolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant senior program: Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study (SENATOR)

Early conversion to everolimus was assessed in kidney transplant recipients participating in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP), a population in whom data are lacking. The SENATOR multicenter study enrolled 207 kidney transplant recipients undergoing steroid withdrawal at week 2 post-transplant (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT00956293]). At week 7, patients were randomized (1:2 ratio) to continue the previous calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based regimen with mycophenolic acid (MPA) and cyclosporine or switch to a CNI-free regimen with MPA, everolimus (5–10 ng/mL) and basiliximab at weeks 7 and 12, then followed for 18 weeks to month 6 post-transplant. The primary endpoint was estimated GFR (eGFR). At week 7, 77/207 (37.2%) patients were randomized (53 everolimus, 24 control). At month 6, eGFR was comparable: 36.5±10.8ml/min with everolimus versus 42.0±13.0ml/min in the control group (p = 0.784). Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 27.8% of everolimus-treated patients and 0.0% of control patients (p = 0005). Efficacy profiles showed no difference. In conclusion, eGFR, safety and efficacy outcomes at month 6 post-transplant showed no difference between groups. The everolimus group experienced a higher rate of discontinuation due to adverse events. However, the high rate of non-randomization is highly relevant, indicating this to be a somewhat unstable patient population regardless of treatment.

Th1, Th2, Th17 cell subsets in two different immunosuppressive protocols in renal allograft recipients (Sirolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil): A cohort study

Long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) is associated with nephrotoxicity, which is an important cause of renal dysfunction. Therefore, CNI-minimization strategies which decrease the CNI nephrotoxicity under the protection of additional immunosuppressant drugs have been developed. The aim of current cohort study was to compare the effect of two immunosuppressive protocols [tacrolimus (TAC) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone (PRED) versus TAC in combination with sirolimus (SRL) and prednisolone] on the frequency of T helper cell subsets (Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells) and their associated cytokine (IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-17A) levels in renal allograft recipients. In this study, renal transplant recipients who received induction therapy (Antithymocyte globulin) and were also on triple immunosuppressive therapy were included and divided in to two groups: Group A was comprised 14 patients who received TAC, MMF and PERD whereas group B was composed of 10 patients who received TAC, SRL and PERD. The frequency of Th1, Th2 and Th17 cells in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of the patients was analyzed by flow cytometry before and 4 months after transplantation. In addition, IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-17A concentrations in PBMC culture supernatants of patients before and 4 months after transplantation were quantified by ELISA. The results of our study showed that TAC, MMF and PRED protocol did not diminish the frequency of Th17 cells at 4 months post-transplantation (5% ± 2.5) compared with pre-transplantation (2.3% ± 1; P < 0.05). However, Th17 (3.6% ± 1.5 pre-transplantation vs 2.2% ± 0.9 at 4 months post-transplantation; P < 0.05), Th2 (1.4% ± 0.3 pre-transplantation vs 0.8% ± 0.4 at 4 months post-transplantation; P < 0.05) cell subsets and IL-4 concentration (71.5 pg/ml ± 12 pre-transplantation vs 62.5 pg/ml ±4.4 at 4 months post-transplantation; P < 0.05) were significantly decreased after transplantation in patients who had received SRL, TAC and PRED. In conclusion, the data of the current study suggest that using reduced dose of TAC in SRL, TAC and PRED protocol is in favor of allograft survival; however a cohort study with larger sample size is needed for confirming our results.

Five-year outcomes in kidney transplant patients randomized to everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine versus standard therapy

HERAKLES was a 1-year randomized, multicenter trial. Patients were randomized at 3 months after kidney transplantation to remain on cyclosporine-based therapy, switch to everolimus without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), or switch to everolimus with low-exposure cyclosporine. Overall, 417 of 497 (83.9%) patients from the core study entered a 4-year extension study. The randomized regimen was continued to year 5 in 75.9%, 41.9% and 24.6% of patients in the standard-CNI, CNI-free and low-CNI groups, respectively. Adjusted estimated GFR at year 5 was significantly higher in the CNI-free group versus standard CNI (difference 7.2 mL/min/1.73 m² , P < .001) or low CNI (difference 7.6 mL/min/1.73 m² , P < .001). For patients who continued randomized therapy for 5 years, differences were 14.4 mL/min/1.73 m²  and 10.1 mL/min/1.73 m² , respectively. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred during the 4-year extension study in 7.6%, 8.6%, and 9.0% of patients in the standard-CNI, CNI-free and low-CNI groups, respectively (P = .927). In conclusion, conversion to a CNI-free everolimus regimen 3 months after kidney transplantation improved long-term graft function, particularly in patients who continued the CNI-free regimen. Low CNI with everolimus did not improve renal function. Efficacy was comparable between groups but frequent immunosuppression changes should be taken into account.

Therapeutic Use of mTOR Inhibitors in Renal Diseases: Advances, Drawbacks, and Challenges

The mammalian (or mechanistic) target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway has a key role in the regulation of a variety of biological processes pivotal for cellular life, aging, and death. Impaired activity of mTOR complexes (mTORC1/mTORC2), particularly mTORC1 overactivation, has been implicated in a plethora of age-related disorders, including human renal diseases. Since the discovery of rapamycin (or sirolimus), more than four decades ago, advances in our understanding of how mTOR participates in renal physiological and pathological mechanisms have grown exponentially, due to both preclinical studies in animal models with genetic modification of some mTOR components as well as due to evidence coming from the clinical experience. The main clinical indication of rapamycin is as immunosuppressive therapy for the prevention of allograft rejection, namely, in renal transplantation. However, considering the central participation of mTOR in the pathogenesis of other renal disorders, the use of rapamycin and its analogs meanwhile developed (rapalogues) everolimus and temsirolimus has been viewed as a promising pharmacological strategy. This article critically reviews the use of mTOR inhibitors in renal diseases. Firstly, we briefly overview the mTOR components and signaling as well as the pharmacological armamentarium targeting the mTOR pathway currently available or in the research and development stages. Thereafter, we revisit the mTOR pathway in renal physiology to conclude with the advances, drawbacks, and challenges regarding the use of mTOR inhibitors, in a translational perspective, in four classes of renal diseases: kidney transplantation, polycystic kidney diseases, renal carcinomas, and diabetic nephropathy.

Rapamycin prevents thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection in mice

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether rapamycin inhibits the development of thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) in mice.

METHODS

Three-week-old C57BL/6J male mice were fed a normal diet and randomized into a control group (n = 6), β-aminopropionitrile fumarate (BAPN) group (Gp A; n = 15), BAPN plus rapamycin (5 mg) group (Gp B; n = 8), and BAPN plus rapamycin (10 mg) group (Gp C; n = 8). Gp A, Gp B, and Gp C were administered BAPN (1 g/kg/d) for 4 weeks. One week after BAPN administration, Gp B and Gp C were treated with rapamycin (5 mg/kg/d or 10 mg/kg/d) through gavage for 21 days. Thoracic aortas were harvested for Western blot and immunofluorescence staining at day 14 and for morphologic and histologic analyses at day 28.

RESULTS

BAPN treatment induced TAAD formation in mice. The incidence of TAAD in control, Gp A, Gp B, and Gp C mice was 0%, 80%, 25%, and 37.5%, respectively. Smaller thoracic aortic diameters (ascending aorta and arch) were observed in Gp B and Gp C mice than in Gp A mice (Gp B vs Gp A: ascending aorta, ex vivo, 1.07 ± 0.21 mm vs 1.80 ± 0.67 mm [P < .05]; aortic arch, ex vivo, 1.51 ± 0.40 mm vs 2.70 ± 1.06 mm [P < .05]; Gp C vs Gp A: ascending aortas, ex vivo, 1.10 ± 0.33 mm vs 1.80 ± 0.67 mm [P < .05]; aortic arch, ex vivo, 1.55 ± 0.56 mm vs 2.70 ± 1.06 mm [P < .05]). TAAD mice exhibited elastin fragmentation, abundant inflammatory cell infiltration, and significantly increased matrix metalloproteinase production in the aorta, and rapamycin treatment alleviated these changes. The protein levels of p-S6K and p-S6 in TAAD aortic tissues increased significantly, whereas they were suppressed by rapamycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapamycin suppressed TAAD formation, probably by inhibition of mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling and reduction of inflammatory cell infiltration and matrix metalloproteinase 9 production. Targeting of the mechanistic target of rapamycin signaling pathway using rapamycin may be a favorable modulation for the clinical treatment of TAAD.

Successful treatment of recurrent immunoglobulin a nephropathy using steroid pulse therapy plus tonsillectomy 10 years after kidney transplantation: a case presentation

Background

Both prevention and treatment of recurrent immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) in kidney transplant recipients are important since recurrent IgAN seems to affect long-term graft survival. We present here a case of recurrent IgAN that was successfully treated using steroid pulse therapy plus tonsillectomy 10 years after kidney transplantation.

Case presentation

A 46-year-old male was admitted for an episode biopsy with a serum creatinine level of 1.8 mg/dl and proteinuria (0.7 g/day). Histological features showed recurrent IgAN (only focal segmental mesangial proliferation) and severe arteriolar hyalinosis partly associated with calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, with limited interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (5%) (IF/TA) 8 years after transplantation. Sodium restriction and conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus successfully reduced his proteinuria to the level of 0.15 g/day. However, 2 years later, his proteinuria increased again (1.0 g/day) and a second episode biopsy showed global mesangial proliferation with glomerular endocapillary and extracapillary proliferation accompanied by progressive IF/TA (20%). The steroid pulse therapy plus tonsillectomy successfully decreased his proteinuria and he achieved clinical remission 3 years after this treatment.

Conclusion

This case, presented with a review of relevant literature, demonstrates the difficulty and importance of the treatment of recurrent IgAN and calcineurin inhibitor arteriolopathy, especially in long-term kidney allograft management.

Everolimus with cyclosporine withdrawal or low-exposure cyclosporine in kidney transplantation from Month 3: a multicentre, randomized trial

Background.

Randomized trials have shown that early adoption of everolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) improves long-term kidney graft function, but the optimal strategy for CNI minimization remains uncertain.

Methods.

In a prospective, randomized, multicentre, 12-month trial, 499 de novo kidney transplant patients were randomized at Month 3 to (i) remain on standard CNI (cyclosporine) therapy with mycophenolic acid, (ii) convert to everolimus with mycophenolic acid or (iii) start everolimus with reduced CNI and no mycophenolic acid (clinical trials registry: ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT00514514).

Results.

The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (Nankivell) from randomization to Month 12, was significantly greater in the CNI-free arm versus standard CNI therapy: mean difference 5.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-8.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001]. The improvement in eGFR in the CNI-free arm was also higher than in the low-CNI group (mean difference 5.5 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , 95% CI 2.8-8.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P < 0.001), while results were similar in the low-CNI and standard CNI arms. The post-randomization incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 11.7%, 8.1% and 7.9% in the CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI groups, respectively (CNI-free versus standard CNI, P = 0.27; low-CNI versus standard CNI, P = 1.00). Adverse events led to study drug discontinuation in 28.7%, 15.5% and 15.2% of CNI-free, low-CNI and standard CNI patients, respectively.

Conclusions.

Everolimus initiation with CNI withdrawal at Month 3 after kidney transplantation achieves a significant improvement in renal function at 12 months, with a similar rate of acute rejection.

Clinical Outcome of Patients With De Novo C1q-Binding Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

De novo donor specific anti-HLA antibodies (dnDSA) may cause graft loss in renal transplant recipients. The capability to bind the complement may help to stratify the risk for inferior outcomes associated with dnDSA. We developed a modified C1q-binding assay and hypothesized that C1q-binding dnDSA could differentiate between indolent and harmful dnDSA causing antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and graft loss.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 59 renal transplant recipients who developed dnDSA and had serum available and complete follow-up. All patients were analyzed for C1q-binding dnDSA at the time of dnDSA detection, and 1-year later or at time of AMR. AMR-positive patients were also tested 6 to 12 months before the event if IgG dnDSA was present.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven of 59 dnDSA patients developed AMR during 5.9 ± 3.1 years follow-up. AMR-positive patients had more dnDSA with a significant higher frequency of class I, a higher frequency and a higher mean fluorescence intensity value of C1q-dnDSA at all time-points. Death-censored AMR-free and allograft survivals were significantly lower in C1q-dnDSA patients. In multivariate analysis, C1q-dnDSA was an independent risk factor for AMR.

CONCLUSIONS

C1q-binding dnDSA is associated with inferior outcomes, yet not in all patients. Nevertheless, C1q-dnDSA was shown to be an independent risk factor of AMR and graft loss and may be a useful tool to stratify the immunological risk for AMR.

CMV and BKPyV Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving an mTOR Inhibitor-Based Regimen Versus a CNI-Based Regimen: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this meta-analysis is to compare the incidences of cytomegalovirus and BK polyoma virus infections in renal transplant recipients receiving a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTOR)-based regimen compared with a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted a comprehensive search for randomized, controlled trials up to January of 2016 addressing our objective. Other outcomes included acute rejection, graft loss, serious adverse events, proteinuria, wound-healing complications, and eGFR. Two review authors selected eligible studies, abstracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We assessed quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.

RESULTS

We included 28 randomized, controlled trials with 6211 participants classified into comparison 1: mTOR inhibitor versus calcineurin inhibitor and comparison 2: mTOR inhibitor plus reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor versus regular dose of calcineurin inhibitor. Results showed decreased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparison 1 (risk ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.72), with high quality of evidence, and comparison 2 (risk ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.80), with moderate quality of evidence. The available evidence neither confirmed nor ruled out a reduction of BK polyoma virus infection in mTOR inhibitor-based group in both comparisons. Secondary outcomes revealed more serious adverse events and acute rejections in mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 and no difference in comparison 2. There was no difference in graft loss in both comparisons. eGFR was higher in the mTOR inhibitor-based group in comparison 1 (mean difference =4.07 ml/min per 1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 1.34 to 6.80) and similar to the calcineurin inhibitor-based group in comparison 2. More proteinuria and wound-healing complications occurred in the mTOR inhibitor-based groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We found moderate- to high-quality evidence of reduced risk of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients in the mTOR inhibitor-based compared with the calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen. Our review also suggested that a combination of a mTOR inhibitor and a reduced dose of calcineurin inhibitor may be associated with similar eGFR and rates of acute rejections and serious adverse events compared with a standard calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen at the expense of higher incidence of proteinuria and wound-healing complications.

Calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal or tapering for kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can reduce acute transplant rejection and immediate graft loss but are associated with significant adverse effects such as hypertension and nephrotoxicity which may contribute to chronic rejection. CNI toxicity has led to numerous studies investigating CNI withdrawal and tapering strategies. Despite this, uncertainty remains about minimisation or withdrawal of CNI.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of CNI tapering or withdrawal in terms of graft function and loss, incidence of acute rejection episodes, treatment-related side effects (hypertension, hyperlipidaemia) and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 11 October 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where drug regimens containing CNI were compared to alternative drug regimens (CNI withdrawal, tapering or low dose) in the post-transplant period were included, without age or dosage restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed studies for eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. Results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 studies that involved 16,156 participants. Most were open-label studies; less than 30% of studies reported randomisation method and allocation concealment. Studies were analysed as intent-to-treat in 60% and all pre-specified outcomes were reported in 54 studies. The attrition and reporting bias were unclear in the remainder of the studies as factors used to judge bias were reported inconsistently. We also noted that 50% (47 studies) of studies were funded by the pharmaceutical industry.We classified studies into four groups: CNI withdrawal or avoidance with or without substitution with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-I); and low dose CNI with or without mTOR-I. The withdrawal groups were further stratified as avoidance and withdrawal subgroups for major outcomes.CNI withdrawal may lead to rejection (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.12; moderate certainty evidence), may make little or no difference to death (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24; moderate certainty), and probably slightly reduces graft loss (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.98; low quality evidence). Hypertension was probably reduced in the CNI withdrawal group (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.95; low certainty), while CNI withdrawal may make little or no difference to malignancy (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.30; low certainty), and probably makes little or no difference to cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.45; low certainty)CNI avoidance may result in increased acute rejection (RR 2.16, 95% CI 0.85 to 5.49; low certainty) but little or no difference in graft loss (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.16; low certainty). Late CNI withdrawal increased acute rejection (RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.59 to 6.48; moderate certainty) but probably reduced graft loss (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97, low certainty).Results were similar when CNI avoidance or withdrawal was combined with the introduction of mTOR-I; acute rejection was probably increased (RR 1.43; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.78; moderate certainty) and there was probably little or no difference in death (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.69 to 1.36, moderate certainty). mTOR-I substitution may make little or no difference to graft loss (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.19; low certainty), probably makes little of no difference to hypertension (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.15; moderate), and probably reduced the risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.82; moderate certainty) and malignancy (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.00; low certainty). Lymphoceles were increased with mTOR-I substitution (RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.21; low certainty).Low dose CNI combined with mTOR-I probably increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (MD 6.24 mL/min, 95% CI 3.28 to 9.119; moderate certainty), reduced graft loss (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.02; moderate certainty), and made little or no difference to acute rejection (RR 1.13 ; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.40; moderate certainty). Hypertension was decreased (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.20; low certainty) as was CMV (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.06; low certainty). Low dose CNI plus mTOR-I makes probably makes little of no difference to malignancy (RR 1.22, 95% CI 0.42 to 3.53; low certainty) and may make little of no difference to death (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.90; moderate certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

CNI avoidance increased acute rejection and CNI withdrawal increases acute rejection but reduced graft loss at least over the short-term. Low dose CNI with induction regimens reduced acute rejection and graft loss with no major adverse events, also in the short-term. The use of mTOR-I reduced CMV infections but increased the risk of acute rejection. These conclusions must be tempered by the lack of long-term data in most of the studies, particularly with regards to chronic antibody-mediated rejection, and the suboptimal methodological quality of the included studies.

Early Conversion From Calcineurin Inhibitor- to Everolimus-Based Therapy Following Kidney Transplantation: Results of the Randomized ELEVATE Trial

In a 24-month, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial, 715 de novo kidney transplant recipients were randomized at 10-14 weeks to convert to everolimus (n = 359) or remain on standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy (n = 356; 231 tacrolimus; 125 cyclosporine), all with mycophenolic acid and steroids. The primary endpoint, change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from randomization to month 12, was similar for everolimus versus CNI: mean (standard error) 0.3(1.5) mL/min/1.73² versus -1.5(1.5) mL/min/1.73² (p = 0.116). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) at month 12 was more frequent under everolimus versus CNI overall (9.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.014) and versus tacrolimus-treated patients (2.6%, p < 0.001) but similar to cyclosporine-treated patients (8.8%, p = 0.755). Reporting on de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was limited but suggested more frequent anti-HLA Class I DSA under everolimus. Change in left ventricular mass index was similar. Discontinuation due to adverse events was more frequent with everolimus (23.6%) versus CNI (8.4%). In conclusion, conversion to everolimus at 10-14 weeks posttransplant was associated with renal function similar to that with standard therapy overall. Rates of BPAR were low in all groups, but lower with tacrolimus than everolimus.

Renal association clinical practice guideline in post-operative care in the kidney transplant recipient

These guidelines cover the care of patients from the period following kidney transplantation until the transplant is no longer working or the patient dies. During the early phase prevention of acute rejection and infection are the priority. After around 3-6 months, the priorities change to preservation of transplant function and avoiding the long-term complications of immunosuppressive medication (the medication used to suppress the immune system to prevent rejection). The topics discussed include organization of outpatient follow up, immunosuppressive medication, treatment of acute and chronic rejection, and prevention of complications. The potential complications discussed include heart disease, infection, cancer, bone disease and blood disorders. There is also a section on contraception and reproductive issues.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and AD depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Wound Healing Complications in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus

BACKGROUND

De novo use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors after kidney transplantation is associated with a concentration-dependent incidence of wound healing adverse events (WHAE). The objective of this analysis was to compare the incidence of WHAE in patients receiving everolimus (EVR) or mycophenolate sodium (MPS).

METHODS

This was a predefined subanalysis of a single-center prospective randomized study in which 288 kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and prednisone were randomized for 3 different regimens: rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG)/EVR (N = 85); basiliximab (BAS)/EVR (N = 102); BAS/MPS (N = 101). Clinical WHAE were prospectively collected using a prespecified case report form in all study visits. Abdominal ultrasound was performed at 30 days posttransplant to capture subclinical abnormalities. Surgeons were blinded to randomized treatment and no specific surgical procedures were implemented.

RESULTS

A higher proportion of patients in BAS/EVR showed at least 1 clinical WHAE (22.3% vs 35.3% vs 22.0%, P = 0.03) and total clinical and subclinical WHAE (35% vs 42% vs 26%, P = 0.014) compared with BAS/MPS, respectively. A higher proportion of patients in r-ATG/EVR showed subclinical WHAE (13% vs 7% vs 4%, P = 0.025) compared with BAS/MPS, respectively. Patients receiving EVR showed a higher risk of developing clinical or subclinical WHAE (r-ATG/EVR vs BAS/MPS hazard ratio 1.30; BAS/EVR vs BAS/MPS hazard ratio 1.73, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus and prednisone, the use of EVR was associated with higher incidence of combined clinical and subclinical WHAE compared with MPS.

Systemic meta-analysis assessing the short term applicability of early conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplant

AIM

To consolidate the present evidence of effectiveness in renal functioning and graft survival following early introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors with or without calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analysed the current literature following PROSPERO approval describing the role of immunosuppressive agent, mTOR inhibitors as an alternative to CNI within six months of renal transplant by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Crossref, and Scopus using MeSH terms.

RESULTS

Six articles of early withdrawal of CNI and introduction of mTOR-inhibitors within six months of renal transplantation were sought. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and serum creatinine were significantly better in mTOR inhibitor group with equivalent survival at 12 mo, even though Biopsy Proven Acute rejection was significantly higher in mTOR-inhibitor group.

CONCLUSION

The evidence reviewed in this meta-analysis suggests that early introduction mTOR-inhibitors substantial CNI minimization. The mTOR inhibitors such as everolimus and sirolimus, due to their complementary mechanism of action and favourable nephrotoxicity profile; better glomerular filtration, lower serum creatinine with equivalent survival. Having said that, due to the higher rejection rate, may influence the use of these regimens to patients with moderate to high immunological risk patients.

Everolimus-Induced Systemic Serositis After Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report

Although everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor, has been used as a potent immunosuppressive agent in organ transplantation, data regarding its adverse effect profile compared with that of sirolimus in clinical circumstances are limited. A 50-year-old man who underwent simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation 14 months previously was admitted with large pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and ascites. Laboratory findings and cultures for possible infectious causes were all negative. Pericardial window surgery with drainage of the pericardial fluid was performed on day 3. Pleural and pericardial biopsy revealed non-specific inflammation without evidence of malignant cells. Everolimus was discontinued and replaced by mycophenolate mofetil on day 4. Significant clinical improvement was observed after discontinuation of everolimus, and follow-up echocardiography and chest radiography showed no recurrence of the pericardial or pleural effusion after discharge.

NFATC1 genotypes affect acute rejection and long-term graft function in cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients

AIM

To investigate the effects of SNPs in the cyclophilin A/calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells (NFATs) pathway genes (PPIA, PPP3CB, PPP3R1, NFATC1 and NFATC2) on cyclosporine (CsA) efficacy in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Seventy-six tag SNPs were detected in 155 CsA-treated renal recipients with at least a 5-year follow-up. The associations of SNPs with acute rejection, nephrotoxicity, pneumonia and estimated glomerular filtration rate post transplant were explored.

RESULTS

NFATC1 rs3894049 GC was a risk factor for acute rejection compared with CC carriers (p = 0.0005). NFATC1 rs2280055 TT carriers had a more stable estimated glomerular filtration rate level than CC (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

Detecting NFATC1 polymorphisms could help predict CsA efficacy in renal transplant patients.

Efficacy and safety of early tacrolimus conversion to sirolimus after kidney transplantation: Long-term results of a prospective randomized study

We report a prospective, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of converting patients with a stable renal function from tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen to a sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen after kidney transplantation. Fifty-eight low-risk renal allograft recipients who receiving Tac 6 months posttransplant, were randomly assigned to continue Tac (n = 29) or convert to SRL (n = 29). We evaluated the 3-year outcomes including patient and graft survival, graft function, and safety profile. Three-year patient and graft survival in SRL and Tac groups were 93.1% versus 100% (P = 0.32), and 89.7% versus 100% (P = 0.11), respectively. However, the SRL group had a significantly better renal function, from the 2^nd year posttransplant until the last follow-up. Four (13.8%) patients in the SRL group and 3 (10.3%) in the Tac group (P = 0.5) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection. Mean urinary protein excretion increased significantly after SRL conversion. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower at the end of the study in patients who eliminated Tac (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg in Tac and SRL group, respectively) (P = 0.03). Mean hemoglobin concentrations decreased after SRL conversion and remained significantly lower from 12 months to 36 months (P = 0.01). The mean serum cholesterol (540 ± 44 mg/dl) and triglyceride (177 ± 27 mg/dl) increased significantly in the SRL group, compared to Tac group (487 ± 62 mg/dl) (P = 0.03) and (141 ± 26 mg/dl) (P = 0.04). Our experience demonstrates that conversion to SRL from calcineurin inhibitors-based therapy may result in better renal function and blood pressure control in renal transplant recipients without an increased risk of acute rejection. However, these benefits have not resulted in a growing advantage in graft or patient survival.

A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Drugs that exhibit close margins between therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations are considered to have a narrow therapeutic index (NTI). The Food and Drug Administration has proposed that NTI drugs should have more stringent bioequivalence standards for approval of generic formulations. However, many immunosuppressant drugs do not have a well-defined therapeutic index (TI).

METHODS

We sought to determine whether safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data obtained from the medical literature through a comprehensive literature search could be used to estimate the TI of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. In this analysis, we considered TI ≤2 as a criterion to define a drug as having an NTI.

RESULTS

Published literature indicates that cyclosporine has a TI of 2-3, which falls just short of our criteria to be classified as having an NTI. We found sirolimus and tacrolimus to have a therapeutic range of 5-12 ng/mL and of 5-20 ng/mL, respectively, but were unable to calculate the TI.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the current literature does not provide a clear indication that these drugs have an NTI, the routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice suggests that more stringent testing of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties should be performed before the approval of generic formulations.

Systematic Review on Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors as an Alternative to Calcineurin Inhibitors in Renal Transplant: Challenges and Window to Excel

OBJECTIVES

This review focuses on the current limited evidence of graft function and graft survival in various immunosuppressive regimens involving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors with or without calcineurin inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated the current literature for describing the role of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors as an alternative to calcineurin inhibitors by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Crossref, and Scopus databases using medical subject heading terms.

RESULTS

Our detailed analyses of all relevant literature showed use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based de novo regimens, early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal with subsequent introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimens, and late conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimens. Notably, early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal with subsequent introduction of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based regimen seemed to be a more practical and realistic approach toward immunosuppressive treatment of renal transplant recipients. However, in view of the high rejection rate observed in these studies, it is advisable not to offer these regimens to patients with moderate to high immunologic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The present evidences suggest that treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors allows early and substantial calcineurin inhibitor minimization. The mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus are preferred due to their complementary mechanisms of action and favorable nephrotoxicity profile, which have opened the way for calcineurin inhibitor reduction/withdrawal in the early posttransplant period.

Safety and Efficacy Outcomes 3 Years After Switching to Belatacept From a Calcineurin Inhibitor in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Phase 2 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

In a phase 2 study, kidney transplant recipients of low immunologic risk who switched from a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to belatacept had improved kidney function at 12 months postconversion versus those continuing CNI therapy, with a low rate of acute rejection and no transplant loss.

STUDY DESIGN

36-month follow-up of the intention-to-treat population.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

CNI-treated adult kidney transplant recipients with stable transplant function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 35-75mL/min/1.73m²).

INTERVENTIONS

At 6 to 36 months posttransplantation, patients were randomly assigned to switch to belatacept-based immunosuppression (n=84) or continue CNI-based therapy (n=89).

OUTCOMES

Safety was the primary outcome. eGFR, acute rejection, transplant loss, and death were also assessed.

MEASUREMENTS

Treatment exposure-adjusted incidence rates for safety, repeated-measures modeling for eGFR, Kaplan-Meier analyses for efficacy.

RESULTS

Serious adverse events occurred in 33 (39%) belatacept-treated patients and 36 (40%) patients in the CNI group. Treatment exposure-adjusted incidence rates for serious infections (belatacept vs CNI, 10.21 vs 9.31 per 100 person-years) and malignancies (3.01 vs 3.41 per 100 person-years) were similar. More patients in the belatacept versus CNI group had any-grade viral infections (14.60 vs 11.00 per 100 person-years). No posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was reported. Belatacept-treated patients had a significantly greater estimated gain in mean eGFR (1.90 vs 0.07mL/min/1.73m² per year; P for time-by-treatment interaction effect = 0.01). The probability of acute rejection was not significantly different for belatacept (8.38% vs 3.60%; HR, 2.50 [95% CI, 0.65-9.65; P=0.2). HR for the comparison of belatacept to the CNI group for time to death or transplant loss was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.14-7.07; P=0.9).

LIMITATIONS

Exploratory post hoc analysis with a small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching patients from a CNI to belatacept may represent a safe approach to immunosuppression and is being further explored in an ongoing phase 3b trial.

Early Kidney Allograft Dysfunction (Threatened Allograft): Comparative Effectiveness of Continuing Versus Discontinuation of Tacrolimus and Use of Sirolimus to Prevent Graft Failure: A Retrospective Patient-Centered Outcome Study

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Background

Due to lack of treatment options for early acute allograft dysfunction in the presence of tubular-interstitial injury without histological features of rejection, kidney transplant recipients are often treated with sirolimus-based therapy to prevent cumulative calcineurin inhibitor exposure and to prevent premature graft failure.

Methods

We analyzed transplant recipients treated with sirolimus-based (n = 220) compared with continued tacrolimus-based (n = 276) immunosuppression in recipients of early-onset graft dysfunction (threatened allograft) with the use of propensity score-based inverse probability treatment weighted models to balance for potential confounding by indication between 2 nonrandomized groups.

Results

Weighted odds for death-censored graft failure (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.66-2.19, P = 0.555) was similar in the 2 groups, but a trend for increased risk of greater than 50% loss in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline in sirolimus group (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 0.96-3.76; P = 0.067) compared with tacrolimus group. Sirloimus group compared with tacrolimus group had increased risk for death with functioning graft (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.29-3.14; P = 0.002) as well as increased risk of late death (death after graft failure while on dialysis) (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.59-3.59; P < 0.001). Analysis of subgroups based on the absence or presence of T cell–mediated rejection or tubulointerstitial inflammation in the index biopsy, or the use of different types of induction agents, and all subgroups had increased risk of death with functioning graft and late death if exposed to sirolimus-based therapy.

Conclusions

Use of sirolimus compared with tacrolimus in recipients with early allograft dysfunction during the first year of transplant may not prevent worsening of allograft function and could potentially lead to poor survival along with increased risk of late death.

Immunosuppression for kidney transplantation: Where are we now and where are we going?

Advances in immunosuppression have propelled kidney transplantation from a scientific curiosity to the optimal treatment for patients with end stage kidney disease. Declining rates of acute rejection have led to improvements in short term kidney transplant survival, culminating in incrementally better long term patient and allograft outcomes. Contextualized around established immune-suppressing drug targets, this review summarizes the history of the clinical science and highlights the pivotal trials that have led to present-day treatment standards at the level of both individual agents and multidrug regimens for kidney recipients. Finally, recently approved and emerging therapies are discussed, with an emphasis on challenges faced by clinicians managing this increasingly complex patient population.

Experience with belatacept rescue therapy in kidney transplant recipients

In kidney transplant recipients with chronic graft dysfunction, long-term immunosuppression with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) or mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) can be challenging due to adverse effects, such as nephrotoxicity and proteinuria. Seventy-nine kidney transplant recipients treated with CNI-based or mTORi-based maintenance immunosuppression who had CNI-induced nephrotoxicity or severe adverse events were switched to belatacept. Mean time from transplantation to belatacept conversion was 69.0 months. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ± standard deviation at baseline was 26.1 ± 15.0 ml/min/1.73 m² , increasing to 34.0 ± 15.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months postconversion (P < 0.0005). Renal function improvements were also seen in patients with low eGFR (<25 ml/min/1.73 m² ) or high proteinuria (>500 mg/l) at conversion. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for patient and graft survival at 12 months were 95.0% and 85.6%, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events was 7.9%. One case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder occurred at 17 months postconversion. For comparison, a historical control group of 41 patients converted to mTORi-based immunosuppression because of biopsy-confirmed CNI-induced toxicity was examined; eGFR increased from 27.6 ± 7.2 ml/min/1.73 m² at baseline to 31.1 ± 11.9 ml/min/1.73 m² at 12 months (P = 0.018). Belatacept-based immunosuppression may be an alternative regimen for kidney transplant recipients with CNI- or mTORi-induced toxicity.

Rapamycin Interferes With Postdepletion Regulatory T Cell Homeostasis and Enhances DSA Formation Corrected by CTLA4-Ig

Previously, we demonstrated that alemtuzumab induction with rapamycin as sole maintenance therapy is associated with an increased incidence of humoral rejection in human kidney transplant patients. To investigate the role of rapamycin in posttransplant humoral responses after T cell depletion, fully MHC mismatched hearts were transplanted into hCD52Tg mice, followed by alemtuzumab treatment with or without a short course of rapamycin. While untreated hCD52Tg recipients acutely rejected B6 hearts (n = 12), hCD52Tg recipients treated with alemtuzumab alone or in conjunction with rapamycin showed a lack of acute rejection (MST > 100). However, additional rapamycin showed a reduced beating quality over time and increased incidence of vasculopathy. Furthermore, rapamycin supplementation showed an increased serum donor-specific antibodies (DSA) level compared to alemtuzumab alone at postoperation days 50 and 100. Surprisingly, additional rapamycin treatment significantly reduced CD4(+) CD25(+) FoxP3(+) T reg cell numbers during treatment. On the contrary, ICOS(+) PD-1(+) CD4 follicular helper T cells in the lymph nodes were significantly increased. Interestingly, CTLA4-Ig supplementation in conjunction with rapamycin corrected rapamycin-induced accelerated posttransplant humoral response by directly modulating Tfh cells but not Treg cells. This suggests that rapamycin after T cell depletion could affect Treg cells leading to an increase of Tfh cells and DSA production that can be reversed by CTLA4-Ig.

Costimulatory Blockade and Use of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors: Avoiding Injury Part 1

Although calcineurin inhibitor drugs have been the mostly used therapy in modern immunosuppression in kidney transplantation, their effect on kidney allograft dysfunction has been suboptimal as far as preservation of kidney function is concerned. Additionally, there are metabolic and other nonmetabolic effects including increased risk of malignancy that has necessitated the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to reduce exposure to calcineurin inhibitors. Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, both sirolimus and everolimus, have been studied in several trials to facilitate preservation of kidney function with variable effects on kidney allograft function and immunogenicity. Preservation of kidney function is increasingly becoming the mainstay of immunosuppression not only in kidney transplantation, but also in extrakidney transplantation. The best kidney outcomes have been reported in calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal studies using mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, in kidney transplant recipients with stable kidney function. This review article summarizes data from several studies in which mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors have been used to reduce exposure to or withdraw calcineurin inhibitors in an attempt to preserve kidney function.

Immunosuppression Minimization and Avoidance Protocols: When Less Is Not More

Kidney transplantation is well established as the best treatment option for end-stage kidney disease. It confers not only a better quality of life but also a significant survival advantage compared to dialysis. However, despite significant improvement in short-term kidney transplant graft survival over the past three decades, long-term graft survival remains suboptimal. Concerns about the possible contribution of chronic calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity to late allograft failure and other serious adverse effects of currently used immunosuppressive agents (especially corticosteroids) have led to increasing interest in developing regimens which may better preserve kidney allograft function and minimize other immunosuppression-related problems without increasing the risk of rejection. The availability of newer immunosuppressive agents has provided the opportunity to formulate such regimens. Approaches to this end include minimization, withdrawal, or avoidance of corticosteroids and CNIs. Currently, replacement of a CNI with a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor while continuing mycophenolate and discontinuation of corticosteroids within the first post-transplant week is being increasingly utilized. Belatacept-based, CNI-free immunosuppression is an emerging alternative approach to avoiding CNI-mediated nephrotoxicity. We also discuss the evolution, results, and pros and cons of corticosteroid- and CNI minimization protocols. Recent studies suggest that chronic alloimmune damage rather than chronic CNI nephrotoxicity is the major contributor to late kidney allograft failure. The implications of this finding for the use of CNI minimization protocols are also discussed.

National Variation in Use of Immunosuppression for Kidney Transplantation: A Call for Evidence-Based Regimen Selection

Immunosuppression management in kidney transplantation has evolved to include an increasingly diverse choice of medications. Although informed by patient and donor characteristics, choice of immunosuppression regimen varies widely across transplant programs. Using a novel database integrating national transplant registry and pharmacy fill records, immunosuppression use at 6-12 and 12-24 mo after transplant was evaluated for 22 453 patients transplanted in 249 U.S. programs in 2005-2010. Use of triple immunosuppression comprising tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid or azathioprine, and steroids varied widely (0-100% of patients per program), as did use of steroid-sparing regimens (0-77%), sirolimus-based regimens (0-100%) and cyclosporine-based regimens (0-78%). Use of triple therapy was more common in highly sensitized patients, women and recipients with dialysis duration >5 years. Sirolimus use appeared to diminish over the study period. Patient and donor characteristics explained only a limited amount of the observed variation in regimen use, whereas center choice explained 30-46% of the use of non-triple-therapy immunosuppression. The majority of patients who received triple-therapy (79%), cyclosporine-based (87.6%) and sirolimus-based (84.3%) regimens continued them in the second year after transplant. This population-based study of immunosuppression practice demonstrates substantial variation in center practice beyond that explained by differences in patient and donor characteristics.

Roles of mTOR complexes in the kidney: implications for renal disease and transplantation

The mTOR pathway has a central role in the regulation of cell metabolism, growth and proliferation. Studies involving selective gene targeting of mTOR complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2) in renal cell populations and/or pharmacologic mTOR inhibition have revealed important roles of mTOR in podocyte homeostasis and tubular transport. Important advances have also been made in understanding the role of mTOR in renal injury, polycystic kidney disease and glomerular diseases, including diabetic nephropathy. Novel insights into the roles of mTORC1 and mTORC2 in the regulation of immune cell homeostasis and function are helping to improve understanding of the complex effects of mTOR targeting on immune responses, including those that impact both de novo renal disease and renal allograft outcomes. Extensive experience in clinical renal transplantation has resulted in successful conversion of patients from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors at various times post-transplantation, with excellent long-term graft function. Widespread use of this practice has, however, been limited owing to mTOR-inhibitor- related toxicities. Unique attributes of mTOR inhibitors include reduced rates of squamous cell carcinoma and cytomegalovirus infection compared to other regimens. As understanding of the mechanisms by which mTORC1 and mTORC2 drive the pathogenesis of renal disease progresses, clinical studies of mTOR pathway targeting will enable testing of evolving hypotheses.

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization, Conversion, Withdrawal, and Avoidance Strategies in Renal Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Despite their clinical efficacy, concerns about calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity make alternative regimens that reduce CNI exposure attractive for renal transplant recipients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed four CNI immunosuppression strategies (minimization, conversion, withdrawal, and avoidance) designed to reduce CNI exposure and assessed the impact of each on patient and allograft survival, acute rejection and renal function. We evaluated 92 comparisons from 88 randomized controlled trials and found moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting that minimization strategies result in better clinical outcomes compared with standard-dose regimens; moderate-strength evidence indicating that conversion to a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor or belatacept was associated with improved renal function but increased rejection risk; and moderate- to high-strength evidence suggesting planned CNI withdrawal could result in improved renal function despite an association with increased rejection risk. The evidence base for avoidance studies was insufficient to draw meaningful conclusions. The applicability of the review is limited by the large number of studies examining cyclosporine-based strategies and low-risk populations. Additional research is needed with tacrolimus-based regimens and higher risk populations. Moreover, research is necessary to clarify the effect of induction and adjunctive agents in alternative immunosuppression strategies and should include more comprehensive and consistent reporting of patient-centered outcomes.

Immunosuppression with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor and incidence of post-transplant cancer in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Evidence is limited regarding the effect of de novo therapy with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors on cancer risk after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Collaborative Transplant Study data from 78 146 adult recipients of first deceased-donor kidney transplants (1999-2013) were analysed (4279 mTOR inhibitor, 73 867 no mTOR inhibitor) using standard methods. Propensity score matching was performed for analysis of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer.

RESULTS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) versus a matched non-transplant population showed reduced tumour incidence in recipients with de novo mTOR inhibitor therapy compared with no mTOR inhibitor for non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) (SIR 5.1 versus 6.1; P =0.019) but not non-NMSC cancers (SIR 1.6 versus 1.7; P =0.35). Within propensity score-matched groups (n = 4265), multivariable Cox regression analysis showed a trend to reduced NMSC with mTOR inhibition [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77; P =0.063] but not for all non-NMSC tumours (HR 0.94; P= 0.59). A significant effect for mTOR inhibition was observed for basal cell carcinoma of the skin (HR 0.56; P= 0.004) but not squamous cell carcinoma (HR 0.87; P= 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

De novo mTOR inhibition was associated with a substantially and significantly reduced risk of basal cell carcinoma of the skin after kidney transplantation. A significant reduction of the incidence of other cancers was not found.