Aberrant expression of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors in human colorectal cancer

Roles of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor-mediated signaling in cancer cell biology

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a simple lipid which is endogenously synthesized from lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) by autotaxin (ATX). LPA mediates a variety of cellular responses through the binding of G protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA1 to LPA6). It is considered that LPA receptor-mediated signaling plays an important role in the pathogenesis of human malignancy. Genetic alterations and epigenetic changes of LPA receptors have been detected in some cancer cells as well as LPA per se. Moreover, LPA receptors contribute to the promotion of tumor progression, including cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, tumorigenicity, and angiogenesis. In recent studies, the activation of LPA receptor-mediated signaling regulates chemoresistance and radiosensitivity in cancer cells. This review provides an updated overview on the roles of LPA receptor-mediated signaling in the regulation of cancer cell functions and its potential utility as a molecular target for novel therapies in clinical cancer approaches.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor-mediated signaling and cellular responses to anticancer drugs and radiation of cancer cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a simple physiological lipid and structurally consists of a fatty, a phosphate and a glycerol. LPA binds to G protein-coupled LPA receptors (LPA1 to LPA6). LPA receptor-mediated signaling mediates a variety of biological responses, such as cell growth, migration, morphogenesis, differentiation and protection from apoptosis. It is considered that LPA receptor-mediated signaling plays an important role in the pathogenesis of human malignancies. So far, genetic and epigenetic alterations of LPA receptors have been found in several cancer cells as well as abnormal LPA production. In addition, LPA receptor-mediated signaling regulates the promotion of malignant behaviors, including chemo- and/or radiation-resistance. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the common approaches to the treatments of cancers. However, resistance to anticancer drugs and irradiation is the most critical limitation for chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we provide the roles of LPA receptor-mediated signaling in the regulation of cellular responses induced by chemotherapeutic agents and irradiation and its biological utility as a possible molecular target for improving cancer cell responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Diagnostic value of serum autotaxin level in colorectal cancer

Background: Autotaxin (ATX) is a nucleotide enzyme linked to cell growth, differentiation and migration. This study investigated serum levels of ATX in colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: The study involved stage I-III CRC diagnosed between December 2020 and 2021, excluding those with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, or metastasis. Healthy volunteers were controls. Serum ATX levels were measured by ELISA and compared. Results: This study included 129 patients (91 in the patient group and 38 in the control group). The optimal cutoff value of ATX for CRC was 169.98 ng/ml, and sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 91.2% (95% CI: 89.4-96.2), 78.9% (95% CI: 62.7-90.4), 4.33 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusion: The serum ATX level is a useful biomarker for CRC.

Autotaxin and Lysophosphatidic Acid Signalling: the Pleiotropic Regulatory Network in Cancer

Autotaxin, also known as ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase family member 2, is a secreted glycoprotein that plays multiple roles in human physiology and cancer pathology. This protein, by converting lysophosphatidylcholine into lysophosphatidic acid, initiates a complex signalling cascade with significant biological implications. The article outlines the autotaxin gene and protein structure, expression regulation and physiological functions, but focuses mainly on the role of autotaxin in cancer development and progression. Autotaxin and lysophosphatidic acid signalling influence several aspects of cancer, including cell proliferation, migration, metastasis, therapy resistance, and interactions with the immune system. The potential of autotaxin as a diagnostic biomarker and promising drug target is also examined.

KAI1/CD82 gene and autotaxin-lysophosphatidic acid axis in gastrointestinal cancers

The KAI1/CD82 gene inhibits the metastasis of most tumors and is remarkably correlated with tumor invasion and prognosis. Cell metabolism dysregulation is an important cause of tumor occurrence, development, and metastasis. As one of the important characteristics of tumors, cell metabolism dysregulation is attracting increasing research attention. Phospholipids are an indispensable substance in the metabolism in various tumor cells. Phospholipid metabolites have become important cell signaling molecules. The pathological role of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in tumors was identified in the early 1990s. Currently, LPA inhibitors have entered clinical trials but are not yet used in clinical treatment. Autotaxin (ATX) has lysophospholipase D (lysoPLD) activity and can regulate LPA levels in vivo. The LPA receptor family and ATX/lysoPLD are abnormally expressed in various gastrointestinal tumors. According to our recent pre-experimental results, KAI1/CD82 might inhibit the migration and metastasis of cancer cells by regulating the ATX-LPA axis. However, no relevant research has been reported. Clarifying the mechanism of ATX-LPA in the inhibition of cancer metastasis by KAI1/CD82 will provide an important theoretical basis for targeted cancer therapy. In this paper, the molecular compositions of the KAI1/CD82 gene and the ATX-LPA axis, their physiological functions in tumors, and their roles in gastrointestinal cancers and target therapy are reviewed.

Reprogrammed Lipid Metabolism and the Lipid-Associated Hallmarks of Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third-most diagnosed cancer and the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Limitations in early and accurate diagnosis of CRC gives rise to poor patient survival. Advancements in analytical techniques have improved our understanding of the cellular and metabolic changes occurring in CRC and potentiate avenues for improved diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Lipids are metabolites with important biological functions; however, their role in CRC is poorly understood. Here, we provide an in-depth review of the recent literature concerning lipid alterations in CRC and propose eight lipid metabolism-associated hallmarks of CRC.

Abstract

Lipids have diverse structures, with multifarious regulatory functions in membrane homeostasis and bioenergetic metabolism, in mediating functional protein–lipid and protein–protein interactions, as in cell signalling and proliferation. An increasing body of evidence supports the notion that aberrant lipid metabolism involving remodelling of cellular membrane structure and changes in energy homeostasis and signalling within cancer-associated pathways play a pivotal role in the onset, progression, and maintenance of colorectal cancer (CRC) and their tumorigenic properties. Recent advances in analytical lipidome analysis technologies have enabled the comprehensive identification and structural characterization of lipids and, consequently, our understanding of the role they play in tumour progression. However, despite progress in our understanding of cancer cell metabolism and lipidomics, the key lipid-associated changes in CRC have yet not been explicitly associated with the well-established ‘hallmarks of cancer’ defined by Hanahan and Weinberg. In this review, we summarize recent findings that highlight the role of reprogrammed lipid metabolism in CRC and use this growing body of evidence to propose eight lipid metabolism-associated hallmarks of colorectal cancer, and to emphasize their importance and linkages to the established cancer hallmarks.

Mechanobiology of Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

It is well documented that colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer type, responsible for high mortality in developed countries, resulting in a high socio-economic impact. Several biochemical and gene expression pathways explaining the manifestation of this cancer in humans have already been identified. However, explanations for some of the related biophysical mechanisms and their influence on CRC remain elusive. In CRC, biophysics and medical research have already revealed the importance of studying the effects of the stiffness and viscoelasticity of the substrate on cells, as well as the effect of the shear stress of blood and lymphatic vessels on the behavior of cells and tissues. A deeper understanding of the relationship between the biophysical cues and biochemical signals could be advantageous to develop new diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies. Being a disease with a high mortality rate, it becomes crucial to dedicate efforts to finding effective, alternative therapeutic strategies.

Abstract

In this review, the mechanobiology of colorectal cancer (CRC) are discussed. Mechanotransduction of CRC is addressed considering the relationship of several biophysical cues and biochemical pathways. Mechanobiology is focused on considering how it may influence epithelial cells in terms of motility, morphometric changes, intravasation, circulation, extravasation, and metastization in CRC development. The roles of the tumor microenvironment, ECM, and stroma are also discussed, taking into account the influence of alterations and surface modifications on mechanical properties and their impact on epithelial cells and CRC progression. The role of cancer-associated fibroblasts and the impact of flow shear stress is addressed in terms of how it affects CRC metastization. Finally, some insights concerning how the knowledge of biophysical mechanisms may contribute to the development of new therapeutic strategies and targeting molecules and how mechanical changes of the microenvironment play a role in CRC disease are presented.

Understanding modulations of lipid mediators in cancer using a murine model of carcinomatous peritonitis

Background

Numerous studies have investigated the possible involvement of eicosanoids, lysophospholipids, and sphingolipids in cancer. We considered that comprehensive measurement of these lipid mediators might provide a better understanding of their involvement in the pathogenesis of cancer. In the present study, we attempted to elucidate the modulations of sphingolipids, lysophospholipids, diacyl‐phospholipids, eicosanoids, and related mediators in cancer by measuring their levels simultaneously by a liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry method in a mouse model of carcinomatous peritonitis.

Methods

We investigated the modulations of these lipids in both ascitic fluid and plasma specimens obtained from Balb/c mice injected intraperitoneally with Colon‐26 cells, as well as the modulations of the lipid contents in the cancer cells obtained from the tumor xenografts.

Results

The results were as follows: the levels of sphingosine 1‐phosphate were increased, while those of lysophosphatidic acid (LysoPA), especially unsaturated long‐chain LysoPA, tended to be increased, in the ascitic fluid. Our findings suggested that ceramides, sphingomyelin, and phosphatidylcholine, their precursors, were supplied by both de novo synthesis and from elsewhere in the body. The levels of lysophosphatidylserine (LysoPS), lysophosphatidylinositol, lysophosphatidylglycerol, and lysophosphatidylethanolamine were also increased in the ascitic fluid, while those of phosphatidylserine (PS), a precursor of LysoPS, were markedly decreased. The levels of arachidonic acid derivatives, especially PGE2‐related metabolites, were increased, while the plasma levels of eicosanoids and related mediators were decreased. Comprehensive statistical analyses mainly identified PS in the ascitic fluid and eicosanoids in the plasma as having highly negative predictive values for cancer.

Conclusions

The results proposed many unknown associations of lipid mediators with cancer, underscoring the need for further studies. In particular, the PS/LysoPS pathway could be a novel therapeutic target, and plasma eicosanoids could be useful biomarkers for cancer.

Prognostic Value and Clinical Significance of LIPH in Breast Cancer

Background

Lipase member H (LIPH), a novel member of the mammalian triglyceride lipase family, is localized on human chromosome 3q27-q28. Exploration of the importance of the new cancer-related gene LIPH in several carcinomas has been reported in previous studies. Our study aims to systematically assess the expression pattern of LIPH in breast cancer.

Methods

Our study explored 2994 breast cancer samples with transcriptome data from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets. We systematically evaluated the mRNA expression of LIPH in breast cancer and the overall survival (OS) of patients. The protein expression of LIPH in breast cancer was evaluated with the Human Protein Atlas. We also explored the relationship between LIPH and the immune microenvironment in pan-cancer.

Results

Both mRNA and protein expression LIPH were found to be upregulated in breast cancer tumors. The overall survival rate of patients with high LIPH expression was lower than those of patients with low LIPH expression in both the TCGA dataset (p=0.0067) and METABRIC dataset (p<0.0001). Outcomes of the multivariate analysis found that the level of LIPH expression was an independent prognostic factor in both TCGA (p=0.001) and METABRIC (p=0.019) databases. The outcomes of the univariate analysis showed that LIPH was an important prognostic factor (p=0.01 in TCGA dataset, p=0.001 in METABRIC dataset). In the TCGA dataset, outcomes showed that LIPH expression was negatively correlated with the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage (p=2.3e-05) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tissues (p=3.1e-10). High LIPH expression showed lower OS in the TNBC subtype (P=0.011).

Conclusion

Compared to normal tissues, the expression of LIPH was higher in breast cancer tissues in both mRNA and protein levels. This study showed that the high level of LIPH expression might be related to the worse prognosis of breast cancer.

The development of modulators for lysophosphatidic acid receptors: A comprehensive review

Lysophosphatidic acids (LPAs) are bioactive phospholipids implicated in a wide range of cellular activities that regulate a diverse array of biological functions. They recognize two types of G protein-coupled receptors (LPARs): LPA_1-3 receptors and LPA_4-6 receptors that belong to the endothelial gene (EDG) family and non-endothelial gene family, respectively. In recent years, the LPA signaling pathway has captured an increasing amount of attention because of its involvement in various diseases, such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cancers, cardiovascular diseases and neuropathic pain, making it a promising target for drug development. While no drugs targeting LPARs have been approved by the FDA thus far, at least three antagonists have entered phase Ⅱ clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (BMS-986020 and BMS-986278) and systemic sclerosis (SAR100842), and one radioligand (BMT-136088/¹⁸F-BMS-986327) has entered phase Ⅰ clinical trials for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This article provides an extensive review on the current status of ligand development targeting LPA receptors to modulate LPA signaling and their therapeutic potential in various diseases.

BRET analysis reveals interaction between the lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA2 and the lysophosphatidylinositol receptor GPR55 in live cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and lysophosphatidylinositol bind to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) LPA and GPR55, respectively. LPA₂ , a type 2 LPA receptor, and GPR55 are highly expressed in colon cancer and involved in cancer progression. However, crosstalk between the two receptors and potential effects on cellular physiology are not fully understood. Here, using BRET analysis, we found that LPA₂ and GPR55 interact in live cells. In the presence of both receptors, LPA₂ and/or GPR55 activation facilitated co-internalization, and activation of GPR55, uncoupled with Gα_i , induced reduction of intracellular cAMP. Notably, co-activation of receptors synergistically triggered further decline in the cAMP level, promoted cell proliferation, and increased the expression of cancer progression-related genes, suggesting that physical and functional crosstalk between LPA₂ and GRR55 is involved in cancer progression.

Lipid Phosphate Phosphatases and Cancer

Lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs) are a group of three enzymes (LPP1–3) that belong to a phospholipid phosphatase (PLPP) family. The LPPs dephosphorylate a wide spectrum of bioactive lipid phosphates, among which lysophosphatidate (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) are two important extracellular signaling molecules. The LPPs are integral membrane proteins, which are localized on plasma membranes and intracellular membranes, including the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi network. LPPs regulate signaling transduction in cancer cells and demonstrate different effects in cancer progression through the breakdown of extracellular LPA and S1P and other intracellular substrates. This review is intended to summarize an up-to-date understanding about the functions of LPPs in cancers.

Role of the autotaxin-lysophosphatidate axis in the development of resistance to cancer therapy

Autotaxin (ATX) is a secreted enzyme that hydrolyzes lysophosphatidylcholine to produce lysophosphatidate (LPA), which signals through six G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Signaling through LPA is terminated by its degradation by a family of three lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs). LPP1 also attenuates signaling downstream of the activation of LPA receptors and some other GPCRs. The ATX-LPA axis mediates a plethora of activities such as cell proliferation, survival, migration, angiogenesis and inflammation, which perform an important role in facilitating wound healing. This wound healing response is hijacked by cancers where there is decreased expression of LPP1 and LPP3 and increased expression of ATX. This maladaptive regulation of LPA signaling also causes chronic inflammation, which has been recognized as one of the hallmarks in cancer. The increased LPA signaling promotes cell survival and migration and attenuates apoptosis, which stimulates tumor growth and metastasis. The wound healing functions of increased LPA signaling also protect cancer cells from effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In this review, we will summarize knowledge of the ATX-LPA axis and its role in the development of resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We will also offer insights for developing strategies of targeting ATX-LPA axis as a novel part of cancer treatment. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Lysophospholipids and their receptors: New data and new insights into their function edited by Susan Smyth, Viswanathan Natarajan and Colleen McMullen.

Lysophosphatidic Acid and Autotaxin-associated Effects on the Initiation and Progression of Colorectal Cancer

The intestinal epithelium interacts dynamically with the immune system to maintain its barrier function to protect the host, while performing the physiological roles in absorption of nutrients, electrolytes, water and minerals. The importance of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and its receptors in the gut has been progressively appreciated. LPA signaling modulates cell proliferation, invasion, adhesion, angiogenesis, and survival that can promote cancer growth and metastasis. These effects are equally important for the maintenance of the epithelial barrier in the gut, which forms the first line of defense against the milieu of potentially pathogenic stimuli. This review focuses on the LPA-mediated signaling that potentially contributes to inflammation and tumor formation in the gastrointestinal tract.

Lysophosphatidic acid regulates the motility of MCF10CA1a breast cancer cell sheets via two opposing signaling pathways

Aberrant cell migration leads to the dispersal of malignant cells. The ubiquitous lipid mediator lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) modulates cell migration and is implicated in tumor progression. Yet, the signaling cascades that regulate LPA's effect on cell motility remain unclear. Using time-lapse imaging and quantitative analyses, we studied the role of signaling cascades that act downstream of LPA on the motility of MCF10CA1a breast cancer cells. We found that LPA alters cell motility via two major signaling pathways. The Rho/ROCK signaling cascade is the predominant pathway that increases E-Cadherin containing cell-cell adhesions and cortical arrangement of actomyosin to promote slow, directional, spatially coherent and temporally consistent movement. In contrast, Gαi/o- and Gαq/11-dependent signaling cascades lessen directionality and support the independent movement of cells. The net effect of LPA on breast cancer cell migration therefore results from the integrated signaling activity of the Rho/ROCK and Gαi/o- and Gαq/11-dependent pathways, thus allowing for a dynamic migratory response to changes in the cellular or microenvironmental context.

Three lysophosphatidic acids with a distinct long chain moiety differently affect cell differentiation of human colon epithelial cells to goblet cells

AIM

The intestinal mucus layer helps maintain intestinal homeostasis. In this study, we investigated the effects of lysophosphatidic acids (LPA) on differentiation of human colon carcinoma cell line, HT-29, to goblet cells with and without sodium butyrate, a known differentiation factor for intestinal cells.

MAIN METHODS

Number and average size of cells with goblet-like morphology in five photographs per dish were measured for assessment of differentiation of HT-29 cells to goblet cells as well as their relative portion of surface of to whole surface area of the photograph.

KEY FINDINGS

Our results revealed that 18:1 LPA enhanced butyrate-induced differentiation of HT-29 cells. Because increased mRNA expression of LPA₅ and decreased mRNA expression of LPA₆ were observed in HT-29 cells after treatment with butyrate, we explored the effects of alkyl LPA and 20:4 LPA, which show preferentially higher affinities to LPA₅ and LPA₆, respectively. As a result, the cell differentiation to goblet cell was increased by alkyl LPA but decreased by 20:4 LPA. Further, alkyl LPA and 18:1 LPA, but not 20:4 LPA, were found to reduce the numbers of cells surviving after incubation in a standard culture medium containing 10% fetal calf serum.

SIGNIFICANCE

We suggest that the three LPAs positively and negatively affect the differentiation of HT-29 cells to goblet cells, which may be associated with their reduced survival through the activation of distinct LPA receptor(s).

Autotaxin-Lysophosphatidic Acid: From Inflammation to Cancer Development

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a ubiquitous lysophospholipid and one of the main membrane-derived lipid signaling molecules. LPA acts as an autocrine/paracrine messenger through at least six G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), known as LPA_1–6, to induce various cellular processes including wound healing, differentiation, proliferation, migration, and survival. LPA receptors and autotaxin (ATX), a secreted phosphodiesterase that produces this phospholipid, are overexpressed in many cancers and impact several features of the disease, including cancer-related inflammation, development, and progression. Many ongoing studies aim to understand ATX-LPA axis signaling in cancer and its potential as a therapeutic target. In this review, we discuss the evidence linking LPA signaling to cancer-related inflammation and its impact on cancer progression.

LPA receptor 1 mediates LPA-induced ovarian cancer metastasis: an in vitro and in vivo study

Background

The facts that LPA is present at high concentration in ovarian cancer patients’ ascites and it may serve as a stimulator to cell migration, implicate the role of LPA in the ovarian cancer metastasis. Since LPA mediates various biological functions through its interaction with LPA receptors, we aim to investigate the correlation between the expression of LPA receptors and the metastasis of ovarian cancer.

Methods

To test whether the LPA responsiveness correlated with the metastatic capability of ovarian cancer cells, we performed LPA induced invasion assay and peritoneal metastatic colonization assay with a panel of established human ovarian cancer cell lines. The expression of LPAR1-3 in different ovarian cancer lines was examined by qRT-PCR. We also tested the effects of LPAR1 inhibition or overexpression on ovarian cancer cell's invasiveness. To confirm our laboratory results, we detected LPARs expression in specimens from 52 ovarian cancer patients by qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry.

Results

Thirteen ovarian cancer cells were enrolled in the invasion assay. Ovarian cancer cell lines which responded well to LPA-induced invasion, also displayed good capability for metastatic colonization. On the contrary, cell lines with poor LPA responsiveness showed inferior metastatic potential in peritoneal colonization assay. High expression level of LPAR1 was detected in all of the metastatic ovarian cancer cell lines. T-test showed that LPAR1, not LPAR2 or LPAR3, expression was significantly higher in the metastatic cell lines than in the non-metastatic cell lines (P = 0.003). Furthermore, silencing LPAR1 alone could significantly reduce LPA-induced invasion (P < 0.001). Finally, we analyzed the correlation between the LPARs expression and clinicopathological features of the clinical cases. It indicated that LPAR1 expression rate increased significantly along with the more advanced stages (stage I: 16.67 %; II 50.00 %; III: 75.00 %; and IV: 100.00 %; P = 0.003). Besides that, LPAR1 expression was detected in all the 13 cases with abdominal metastasis more than 2 cm, 10 cases with retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis and 6 cases with hepatic metastasis. Moreover, the expression rate of LPAR2 significantly increased in ovarian cancer than in normal specimens (P = 0.039). LPAR3 expression showed the same trend as LPAR2, though the difference is not statistically significant (P = 0.275). Besides that LPAR2 and LPAR3 expression increased along with poorer differentiation (P = 0.002, P = 0.034, respectively).

Conclusions

Metastatic capability of ovarian cancer cells correlated well with their responsiveness to LPA for cell invasion. LPAR1 acts as the main mediator responsible for LPA-stimulated ovarian cancer cell invasion. LPAR2 and LPAR3 might play an role in carcinogenesis of ovarian cancer.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Up-Regulates Hexokinase II and Glycolysis to Promote Proliferation of Ovarian Cancer Cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a blood-borne lipid mediator, is present in elevated concentrations in ascites of ovarian cancer patients and other malignant effusions. LPA is a potent mitogen in cancer cells. The mechanism linking LPA signal to cancer cell proliferation is not well understood. Little is known about whether LPA affects glucose metabolism to accommodate rapid proliferation of cancer cells. Here we describe that in ovarian cancer cells, LPA enhances glycolytic rate and lactate efflux. A real time PCR-based miniarray showed that hexokinase II (HK2) was the most dramatically induced glycolytic gene to promote glycolysis in LPA-treated cells. Analysis of the human HK2 gene promoter identified the sterol regulatory element-binding protein as the primary mediator of LPA-induced HK2 transcription. The effects of LPA on HK2 and glycolysis rely on LPA₂, an LPA receptor subtype overexpressed in ovarian cancer and many other malignancies. We further examined the general role of growth factor-induced glycolysis in cell proliferation. Like LPA, epidermal growth factor (EGF) elicited robust glycolytic and proliferative responses in ovarian cancer cells. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and insulin, however, potently stimulated cell proliferation but only modestly induced glycolysis. Consistent with their differential effects on glycolysis, LPA and EGF-dependent cell proliferation was highly sensitive to glycolytic inhibition while the growth-promoting effect of IGF-1 or insulin was more resistant. These results indicate that LPA- and EGF-induced cell proliferation selectively involves up-regulation of HK2 and glycolytic metabolism. The work is the first to implicate LPA signaling in promotion of glucose metabolism in cancer cells.

Transgenic Expression of Human Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor LPA2 in Mouse Intestinal Epithelial Cells Induces Intestinal Dysplasia

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) acts on LPA₂ receptor to mediate multiple pathological effects that are associated with tumorigenesis. The absence of LPA₂ attenuates tumor progression in rodent models of colorectal cancer, but whether overexpression of LPA₂ alone can lead to malignant transformation in the intestinal tract has not been studied. In this study, we expressed human LPA₂ in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) under control of the villin promoter. Less than 4% of F1-generation mice had germline transmission of transgenic (TG) human LPA₂; as such only 3 F1 mice out of 72 genotyped had TG expression. These TG mice appeared anemic with hematochezia and died shortly after birth. TG mice were smaller in size compared with the wild type mouse of the same age and sex. Morphological analysis showed that TG LPA₂ colon had hyper-proliferation of IECs resulting in increased colonic crypt depth. Surprisingly, TG small intestine had villus blunting and decreased IEC proliferation and dysplasia. In both intestine and colon, TG expression of LPA₂ compromised the terminal epithelial differentiation, consistent with epithelial dysplasia. Furthermore, we showed that epithelial dysplasia was observed in founder mouse intestine, correlating LPA₂ overexpression with epithelial dysplasia. The current study demonstrates that overexpression of LPA₂ alone can lead to intestinal dysplasia.

Sphingosine kinase 1 is upregulated with lysophosphatidic acid receptor 2 in human colorectal cancer

AIM: To examine the expression of SphK1, an oncogenic kinase that produces sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P), and its correlation with the expression of LPAR2, a major lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor overexpressed in various cancers, in human colorectal cancer.

METHODS: Real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction was used to measure the mRNA expression of SphK1, LPAR2, and the three major S1P receptors in 27 colorectal cancer samples and corresponding normal tissue samples. We also examined the correlation between the expression of SphK1 and LPAR2.

RESULTS: Colorectal cancer tissue in 22 of 27 patients had higher levels of SphK1 mRNA than in normal tissue. In two-thirds of the samples, SphK1 mRNA expression was more than two-fold higher than in normal tissue. Consistent with previous reports, LPAR2 mRNA expression in 20 of 27 colorectal cancer tissue samples was higher compared to normal tissue samples. Expression profiles of all three major S1P receptors, S1PR1, S1PR2, and S1PR3, varied without any trend, with no significant difference in expression between cancer and normal tissues. A highly significant positive correlation was found between SphK1 and LPAR2 expression [Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) = 0.784 and P < 0.01]. The mRNA levels of SphK1 and LPAR2 did not correlate with TNM stage.

CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that S1P and LPA may play important roles in the development of colorectal cancer via the upregulation of SphK1 and LPAR2, both of which could serve as new therapeutic targets in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Recent advances in targeting the autotaxin-lysophosphatidate-lipid phosphate phosphatase axis in vivo

Extracellular lysophosphatidate (LPA) is a potent bioactive lipid that signals through six G-protein-coupled receptors. This signaling is required for embryogenesis, tissue repair and remodeling processes. LPA is produced from circulating lysophosphatidylcholine by autotaxin (ATX), and is degraded outside cells by a family of three enzymes called the lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs). In many pathological conditions, particularly in cancers, LPA concentrations are increased due to high ATX expression and low LPP activity. In cancers, LPA signaling drives tumor growth, angiogenesis, metastasis, resistance to chemotherapy and decreased efficacy of radiotherapy. Hence, targeting the ATX-LPA-LPP axis is an attractive strategy for introducing novel adjuvant therapeutic options. In this review, we will summarize current progress in targeting the ATX-LPA-LPP axis with inhibitors of autotaxin activity, LPA receptor antagonists, LPA monoclonal antibodies, and increasing low LPP expression. Some of these agents are already in clinical trials and have applications beyond cancer, including chronic inflammatory diseases.

Diverse roles of LPA signaling in the intestinal epithelium

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a lipid mediator that modulates a wide variety of cellular functions. Elevated LPA signaling has been reported in patients with colorectal cancer or inflammatory bowel diseases, and the tumorigenic role of LPA has been demonstrated in experimental models of colon cancer. However, emerging evidence indicates the importance of LPA signaling in epithelial wound healing and regulation of intestinal electrolyte transport. Here, we briefly review current knowledge of the biological roles of LPA signaling in the intestinal tract.

New insights into the autotaxin/LPA axis in cancer development and metastasis

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a simple lipid with a single fatty acyl chain linked to a glycerophosphate backbone. Despite the simplicity of its structure but owing to its interactions with a series of at least six G protein-coupled receptors (LPA1-6), LPA exerts pleiotropic bioactivities including stimulation of proliferation, migration and survival of many cell types. Autotaxin (ATX) is a unique enzyme with a lysophospholipase D (lysoPLD) activity that is responsible for the levels of LPA in the blood circulation. Both LPA receptor family members and ATX/LysoPLD are aberrantly expressed in many human cancers. This review will present the more striking as well as novel experimental evidences using cell lines, cancer mouse models and transgenic animals identifying the roles for ATX and LPA receptors in cancer progression, tumor cell invasion and metastasis.

Autotaxin and LPA1 and LPA5 receptors exert disparate functions in tumor cells versus the host tissue microenvironment in melanoma invasion and metastasis

Autotaxin (ENPP2/ATX) and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptors represent two key players in regulating cancer progression. The present study sought to understand the mechanistic role of LPA G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR), not only in the tumor cells but also in stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment. B16F10 melanoma cells predominantly express LPA5 and LPA2 receptors but lack LPA1. LPA dose dependently inhibited invasion of cells across a Matrigel layer. RNAi-mediated knockdown of LPA5 relieved the inhibitory effect of LPA on invasion without affecting basal invasion. This suggests that LPA5 exerts an anti-invasive action in melanoma cells in response to LPA. In addition, both siRNA-mediated knockdown and pharmacologic inhibition of LPA2 reduced the basal rate invasion. Unexpectedly, when probing the role of this GPCR in host tissues, it was found that the incidence of melanoma-derived lung metastasis was greatly reduced in LPA5 knockout (KO) mice compared with wild-type (WT) mice. LPA1-KO but not LPA2-KO mice also showed diminished melanoma-derived lung metastasis, suggesting that host LPA1 and LPA5 receptors play critical roles in the seeding of metastasis. The decrease in tumor cell residence in the lungs of LPA1-KO and LPA5-KO animals was apparent 24 hours after injection. However, KO of LPA1, LPA2, or LPA5 did not affect the subcutaneous growth of melanoma tumors.

IMPLICATIONS

These findings suggest that tumor and stromal LPA receptors, in particular LPA1 and LPA5, play different roles in invasion and the seeding of metastasis.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) signaling in human and ruminant reproductive tract

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) through activating its G protein-coupled receptors (LPAR 1–6) exerts diverse cellular effects that in turn influence several physiological processes including reproductive function of the female. Studies in various species of animals and also in humans have identified important roles for the receptor-mediated LPA signaling in multiple aspects of human and animal reproductive tract function. These aspects range from ovarian and uterine function, estrous cycle regulation, early embryo development, embryo implantation, decidualization to pregnancy maintenance and parturition. LPA signaling can also have pathological consequences, influencing aspects of endometriosis and reproductive tissue associated tumors. The review describes recent progress in LPA signaling research relevant to human and ruminant reproduction, pointing at the cow as a relevant model to study LPA influence on the human reproductive performance.

Methods for quantifying lysophosphatidic acid in body fluids: a review

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid involved in cellular signal transduction. LPA plays a role in both physiological and pathological processes. Elevated levels of LPA are observed in the plasma of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, indicating its potential as a diagnostic marker. Quantification of total LPA can be performed by radioenzymatic, fluorometric, colorimetric, or immunoezymatic assay. Determination of individual LPA molecular species requires the use of capillary electrophoresis, gas chromatography, thin layer chromatography, liquid chromatography, or a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight method connected to an appropriate detection system.

Lipase member H is a novel secreted protein selectively upregulated in human lung adenocarcinomas and bronchioloalveolar carcinomas

Lung cancer is one of the most frequent causes of cancer-related death worldwide. However, molecular markers for lung cancer have not been well established. To identify novel genes related to lung cancer development, we surveyed publicly available DNA microarray data on lung cancer tissues. We identified lipase member H (LIPH, also known as mPA-PLA1) as one of the significantly upregulated genes in lung adenocarcinoma. LIPH was expressed in several adenocarcinoma cell lines when they were analyzed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), western blotting, and sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunohistochemical analysis detected LIPH expression in most of the adenocarcinomas and bronchioloalveolar carcinomas tissue sections obtained from lung cancer patients. LIPH expression was also observed less frequently in the squamous lung cancer tissue samples. Furthermore, LIPH protein was upregulated in the serum of early- and late-phase lung cancer patients when they were analyzed by ELISA. Interestingly, high serum level of LIPH was correlated with better survival in early phase lung cancer patients after surgery. Thus, LIPH may be a novel molecular biomarker for lung cancer, especially for adenocarcinoma and bronchioloalveolar carcinoma.

Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) by lysophosphatidic acid is dependent on interplay between p53 and Krüppel-like factor 5

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and p53 are pivotal regulators of tumor growth. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a lipid mediator that functions as a mitogen by acting through LPA receptors. We have shown previously that LPA stimulates HIF-1α expression in colon cancer cells. To determine the mechanism of HIF-1α induction by LPA, we compared the effect of LPA on HIF-1α in several colon cancer cell lines. LPA transcriptionally induced HIF-1α in colon cancer cells. HIF-1α induction was observed in cells expressing WT p53, where LPA decreased p53 expression. However, LPA failed to induce HIF-1α when the p53 gene was mutated. A decrease in p53 expression was dependent on induction of p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase Mdm2 by LPA. Krüppel-like factor 5 (KLF5) is an effector of LPA-induced proliferation of colon cancer cells. Because HIF-1α was necessary for LPA-induced growth of colon cancer cells, we determined the relationship between KLF5 and HIF-1α by a loss-of-function approach. Silencing of KLF5 inhibited LPA-induced HIF-1α induction, suggesting that KLF5 is an upstream regulator of HIF-1α. KLF5 and p53 binding to the Hif1α promoter was assessed by ChIP assay. LPA increased the occupancy of the Hif1α promoter by KLF5, while decreasing p53 binding. Transfection of HCT116 cells with KLF5 or p53 attenuated the binding of the other transcription factor. These results identify KLF5 as a transactivator of HIF-1α and show that LPA regulates HIF-1α by dynamically modulating its interaction with KLF5 and p53.

The gep proto-oncogene Gα13 mediates lysophosphatidic acid-mediated migration of pancreatic cancer cells

OBJECTIVES

Tumor microenvironment, defined by a variety of growth factors including lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), whose levels are increased in pancreatic cancer patients, plays a major role in the genesis and progression of pancreatic cancer. Because the gep proto-oncogenes, Gα12 and Gα13, are implicated in LPA-stimulated oncogenic signaling, this study is focused on evaluating the role of these proto-oncogenes in LPA-stimulated invasive migration of pancreatic cancer cells.

METHODS

Effect of LPA on the migration and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells was assessed using BxPC3, Dan-G, MDAPanc-28, Panc-1, and PaCa-2 cell lines. The role of Gα13 in the migration of pancreatic cancer cells was interrogated by disrupting lysophosphatidic acid receptor-Gα13 interaction using CT13, a dominant negative mutant of Gα13, and by silencing the expression of Gα13.

RESULTS

Results indicate that LPA stimulates the migration of pancreatic cancer cells and such LPA-stimulated migratory response is mediated by Gα13. Furthermore, the results establish that the silencing of Gα13, but not Gα12, abrogates LPA-stimulated invasive migration of pancreatic cancer cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results report for the first time a critical role for Gα13 in LPA-stimulated invasive migration of pancreatic cancer cells. These findings identify LPA-lysophosphatidic acid receptor-Gα13 signaling node as a novel therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer treatment and control.

TNF-α and LPA promote synergistic expression of COX-2 in human colonic myofibroblasts: role of LPA-mediated transactivation of upregulated EGFR

Background

Enhanced EGF receptor (EGFR) signaling is a hallmark of many human cancers, though the role of enhanced EGFR signaling within the surrounding tumor stroma has not been well studied. The myofibroblast is an important stromal cell that demonstrates enhanced EGFR expression in the setting of inflammation, though the functional relevance is not known. We recently reported that TNF-α and the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonist lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) lead to synergistic cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression, an enzyme strongly associated with the development of colitis-associated cancer. Here, we investigate whether EGFR signaling plays a role in the synergistic COX-2 expression induced by LPA and TNF-α.

Methods

18Co cells, a model of human colonic myofibroblasts, were grown to confluence on 35 × 10mm cell culture dishes and were used from passages 10–14. 18Co cells were treated with TNF-α (8.3 ng/ml) and LPA (10 μM). EGFR and COX-2 protein expression, Y1068 phosphorylation, and p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation were assessed by Western Blot, in the presence and absence of various inhibitors.

Results

Exposure of 18Co cells to either TNF-α or LPA alone had no effect on EGFR autophosphorylation at Y1068. However, chronic exposure to TNF-α led to upregulation of EGFR in association with sustained LPA-mediated EGFR phosphorylation at Y1068. TNF-α and LPA also led to sustained p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation and synergistic COX-2 expression, effects that were partially inhibited by the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478. p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation and COX-2 expression were inhibited to the same degree by the MMP inhibitors GM6001 and BB-94, suggesting that LPA-mediated EGFR transactivation involved MMP-mediated release of EGFR ligands from the cell surface. The Src inhibitor SU6556 inhibited TNF-α/LPA-mediated EGFR phosphorylation at Y1068, p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation, and COX-2 expression in a dose-dependent fashion, suggesting an upstream role of Src in the transactivation of EGFR.

Conclusion

Synergistic COX-2 expression induced by TNF-α and LPA involves Src/MMP-mediated transactivation of EGFR and downstream p42/44 MAPK activation in human colonic myofibroblasts. Enhanced EGFR expression induced by TNF-α promotes GPCR-mediated EGFR transactivation in colonic myofibroblasts, providing an important mechanism for stromal COX-2 over-expression that may predispose to the development of colitis-associated cancer.

Migration of gastric cancer cells in response to lysophosphatidic acid is mediated by LPA receptor 2

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a natural phospholipid, is able to modulate diverse cellular responses through LPA receptors (LPARs). Several studies have reported that LPAR2 gene expression is increased in a variety of cancer cells, suggesting that LPAR2 is involved in gastric cancer. The present study investigated the expression profiles of the LPAR and involvement of the receptor subtypes in the LPA-induced migration of gastric cancer cells using cell migration assays, RNA interference, quantitative real-time PCR and western blotting. LPAR2 was observed to be highly expressed in SGC-7901 cells, a human gastric cancer cell line, while LPAR1 and LPAR3 were not. Transient transfection with LPAR2 siRNA was observed to reduce LPAR2 mRNA in SGC-7901 cells and eliminate the LPA-induced cell migration. It was also observed that LPA-induced SGC-7901 cell migration was inhibited by the inhibitor for Gq/11 protein and p38. The results suggest that the LPAR2/Gq/11/p38 pathway regulates LPA-induced SGC-7901 cell migration. The present findings suggest that LPAR2 may be a potential target for the clinical treatment of gastric cancer.

LPA-induced suppression of periostin in human osteosarcoma cells is mediated by the LPA(1)/Egr-1 axis

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a naturally occurring bioactive phospholipid, mediates a multitude of (patho)physiological events including activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). As LPA may induce cellular reponses in human osteosarcoma, the present study aimed at investigating expression of various LPA receptors, LPA-mediated activation of MAPK via G-protein coupling, and expression of early response genes in a cellular model for human osteosarcoma. We show that MG-63 cells express three members of the endothelial differentiation gene (Edg) family of G-protein coupled receptor transcripts (LPA(1-3)) but only two (LPA(4/5)) out of three members of the non-Edg family LPA receptor transcripts. Stimulation of MG-63 cells with LPA or synthetic LPA receptor agonists resulted in p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation via LPA(1)-LPA(3) receptors. Using pharmacological inhibitors, we show that LPA-mediated phosphorylation of p42/44 MAPK by LPA receptor engagement is transmitted by G(αi)-dependent pathways through the Src family of tyrosine kinases. As a consequence, a rapid and transient upregulation of the zinc finger transcription factor early growth response-1 (Egr-1) was observed. Egr-1 expression was strictly mediated via G(αi)/Src/p42/44 MAPK pathway; no involvement of the G(αq/11)/PLC/PKC or the PLD/PI3 kinase/Akt pathways was found. LPA-induced expression of functional Egr-1 in MG-63 cells could be confirmed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. LPA-induced Egr-1 upregulation was accompanied by a time-dependent decrease of periostin (previously called osteoblast-specific factor 2), a cell adhesion protein for pre-osteoblasts. Silencing of LPA(1) and/or Egr-1 in MG-63 cells reversed LPA-mediated suppression of periostin. We here demonstrate a crosslink between Egr-1 and periostin in cancer cells, in particular in human osteosarcoma.

Expression of lysophosphatidic acid receptors and local invasiveness and metastasis in Chinese pancreatic cancers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The present study evaluated the potential role of lysophosphatidic acid receptors (lpars) in processes leading to local invasiveness and metastasis in Chinese pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blot analysis were used to detect expression of lpars in tumour and adjacent non-tumour tissues from patients with surgically resected pancreatic carcinoma. Surgical specimens from 50 patients were examined for relative expression of each receptor's messenger rna (mrna) and protein. Findings were analyzed for correlations with tumour size, pathologic classification, clinical stage, and infiltration of capsule and lymphonodi.

RESULTS

Increased levels of mrna of lpars (lpar1 ≈ lpar3 < lpar2) were found in the pancreatic cancer tissues examined. Low levels of transcripts for lpar1, lpar2, and lpar3 receptors were detectable in adjacent non-tumour tissues. The difference in lpar1 protein expression between tumour and adjacent non-tumour tissues does not seem significant, but the signals of lpar2 expression in pancreatic cancer tumour tissues were significantly amplified compared with those in adjacent non-tumour tissues. Tumour and adjacent non-tumour tissues both weakly expressed lpar3 protein with no statistical difference. However, expression of lpar1, lpar2, and lpar3 showed an obvious correlation with infiltration of capsule cells, surrounding lymphonodi, and specific histopathologic features.

CONCLUSIONS

Lysophosphatidic acid receptor is a promising indicator for pancreatic cancer, and our findings suggested that lpar2 might be a potential target for clinical treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Gene expression of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 is a target of transforming growth factor beta

The lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) receptor LPA₁/Edg2 is the first identified LPA receptor. Although its wide tissue distribution and biological functions have been well studied, little is known about how LPA₁ is transcriptionally regulated. In the current study, we showed that LPA₁ is a physiological target of transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ)-mediated repression. In both normal and neoplastic cells, TGFβ inhibits LPA₁ promoter activity, LPA₁ mRNA expression, and LPA₁-dependent chemotaxis and tumor cell invasion. Knockdown of the TGFβ intracellular effector Smad3 or Smad4 with lentivirally transduced shRNA relieved these inhibitory effects of TGFβ. Interestingly, the LPA₁ promoter contains two potential TGFβ inhibitory elements (TIEs), each consisting of a Smad binding site and an adjacent E2F4/5 element, structurally similar to the TIE found on the promoter of the well-defined TGFβ target gene c-myc. Deletion and point mutation analyses indicate that the distal TIE located at 401 bp from the transcription initiation site, is required for TGFβ repression of the LPA₁ promoter. A DNA pull-down assay showed that the -401 TIE was capable of binding Samd3 and E2F4 in TGFβ-treated cells. TGFβ-induced binding of the Smad complex to the native -401 TIE sequence of the LPA₁ gene promoter was further verified by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. We therefore identified a novel role of TGFβ in the control of LPA₁ expression and LPA₁-coupled biological functions, adding LPA₁ to the list of TGFβ-repressed target genes.

The orphan receptor GPR55 drives skin carcinogenesis and is upregulated in human squamous cell carcinomas

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control crucial physiological processes and their dysfunction contributes to various human diseases, including cancer. The orphan GPCR GPR55 was identified and cloned more than a decade ago, but very little is known about its physio-pathological relevance. It has been recently shown that GPR55 controls the behavior of human cancer cell lines in culture and xenografts. However, the assessment of the actual role of this receptor in malignant transformation in vivo is hampered by the lack of studies on its functional impact in clinically-relevant models of cancer. Here we demonstrate that GPR55 drives mouse skin tumor development. Thus, GPR55-deficient mice were more resistant to DMBA/TPA-induced papilloma and carcinoma formation than their wild-type littermates. GPR55 exerted this pro-tumor effect primarily by conferring a proliferative advantage on cancer cells. In addition, GPR55 enhanced skin cancer cell anchorage-independent growth, invasiveness and tumorigenicity in vivo, suggesting that it promotes not only tumor development but also tumor aggressiveness. Finally, we observed that GPR55 is upregulated in human skin tumors and other human squamous cell carcinomas compared with the corresponding healthy tissues. Altogether, these findings reveal the pivotal importance of GPR55 in skin tumor development, and suggest that this receptor may be used as a new biomarker and therapeutic target in squamous cell carcinomas.

Lysophosphatidic acid activates lipogenic pathways and de novo lipid synthesis in ovarian cancer cells

One of the most common molecular changes in cancer is the increased endogenous lipid synthesis, mediated primarily by overexpression and/or hyperactivity of fatty acid synthase (FAS) and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC). The changes in these key lipogenic enzymes are critical for the development and maintenance of the malignant phenotype. Previous efforts to control oncogenic lipogenesis have been focused on pharmacological inhibitors of FAS and ACC. Although they show anti-tumor effects in culture and in mouse models, these inhibitors are nonselective blockers of lipid synthesis in both normal and cancer cells. To target lipid anabolism in tumor cells specifically, it is important to identify the mechanism governing hyperactive lipogenesis in malignant cells. In this study, we demonstrate that lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a growth factor-like mediator present at high levels in ascites of ovarian cancer patients, regulates the sterol regulatory element binding protein-FAS and AMP-activated protein kinase-ACC pathways in ovarian cancer cells but not in normal or immortalized ovarian epithelial cells. Activation of these lipogenic pathways is linked to increased de novo lipid synthesis. The pro-lipogenic action of LPA is mediated through LPA(2), an LPA receptor subtype overexpressed in ovarian cancer and other malignancies. Downstream of LPA(2), the G(12/13) and G(q) signaling cascades mediate LPA-dependent sterol regulatory element-binding protein activation and AMP-activated protein kinase inhibition, respectively. Moreover, inhibition of de novo lipid synthesis dramatically attenuated LPA-induced cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that LPA signaling is causally linked to the hyperactive lipogenesis in ovarian cancer cells, which can be exploited for development of new anti-cancer therapies.

Lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine-1-phosphate promote morphogenesis and block invasion of prostate cancer cells in three-dimensional organotypic models

Normal prostate and some malignant prostate cancer (PrCa) cell lines undergo acinar differentiation and form spheroids in three-dimensional (3-D) organotypic culture. Acini formed by PC-3 and PC-3M, less pronounced also in other PrCa cell lines, spontaneously undergo an invasive switch, leading to the disintegration of epithelial structures and the basal lamina, and formation of invadopodia. This demonstrates the highly dynamic nature of epithelial plasticity, balancing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition against metastable acinar differentiation. This study assessed the role of lipid metabolites on epithelial maturation. PC-3 cells completely failed to form acinar structures in delipidated serum. Adding back lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) rescued acinar morphogenesis and repressed invasion effectively. Blocking LPA receptor 1 (LPAR1) functions by siRNA (small interference RNA) or the specific LPAR1 inhibitor Ki16425 promoted invasion, while silencing of other G-protein-coupled receptors responsive to LPA or S1P mainly caused growth arrest or had no effects. The G-proteins Gα(12/13) and Gα(i) were identified as key mediators of LPA signalling via stimulation of RhoA and Rho kinases ROCK1 and 2, activating Rac1, while inhibition of adenylate cyclase and accumulation of cAMP may be secondary. Interfering with these pathways specifically impeded epithelial polarization in transformed cells. In contrast, blocking the same pathways in non-transformed, normal cells promoted differentiation. We conclude that LPA and LPAR1 effectively promote epithelial maturation and block invasion of PrCa cells in 3-D culture. The analysis of clinical transcriptome data confirmed reduced expression of LPAR1 in a subset of PrCa's. Our study demonstrates a metastasis-suppressor function for LPAR1 and Gα(12/13) signalling, regulating cell motility and invasion versus epithelial maturation.