Nuclear overexpression of lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor 1 identifies chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma in small B-cell lymphomas

A distinct isoform of lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) epigenetically restricts EBV reactivation to maintain viral latency

As a human tumor virus, EBV is present as a latent infection in its associated malignancies where genetic and epigenetic changes have been shown to impede cellular differentiation and viral reactivation. We reported previously that levels of the Wnt signaling effector, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) increased following EBV epithelial infection and an epigenetic reprogramming event was maintained even after loss of the viral genome. Elevated LEF1 levels are also observed in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and Burkitt lymphoma. To determine the role played by LEF1 in the EBV life cycle, we used in silico analysis of EBV type 1 and 2 genomes to identify over 20 Wnt-response elements, which suggests that LEF1 may bind directly to the EBV genome and regulate the viral life cycle. Using CUT&RUN-seq, LEF1 was shown to bind the latent EBV genome at various sites encoding viral lytic products that included the immediate early transactivator BZLF1 and viral primase BSLF1 genes. The LEF1 gene encodes various long and short protein isoforms. siRNA depletion of specific LEF1 isoforms revealed that the alternative-promoter derived isoform with an N-terminal truncation (ΔN LEF1) transcriptionally repressed lytic genes associated with LEF1 binding. In addition, forced expression of the ΔN LEF1 isoform antagonized EBV reactivation. As LEF1 repression requires histone deacetylase activity through either recruitment of or direct intrinsic histone deacetylase activity, siRNA depletion of LEF1 resulted in increased histone 3 lysine 9 and lysine 27 acetylation at LEF1 binding sites and across the EBV genome. Taken together, these results indicate a novel role for LEF1 in maintaining EBV latency and restriction viral reactivation via repressive chromatin remodeling of critical lytic cycle factors.

Leukemic-phase mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

A 78-year-old man presenting with leukocytosis was admitted to our hospital. The patient was asymptomatic and showed no lymphadenopathy. Peripheral blood flow cytometry revealed a leukemic-phase B-cell lymphoma with medium-to-large abnormal cells with reticulum. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography revealed abnormal uptake in the right orbit, bone marrow, and spleen. We performed immunological staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissues extracted from the right orbit and bone marrow, which led to the diagnosis of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Polymerase chain reaction analysis of immunoglobulin heavy chain rearrangements in the right orbital mass and bone marrow suggested that they were identical clones. Based on these collective findings, the diagnosis of leukemic-phase MALT lymphoma was confirmed, with sites of involvement including the bone marrow, peripheral blood, right orbit, and spleen. This is a highly rare case of leukemic MALT lymphoma.

Proteogenomic Profiling of High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With 11q Aberrations and Burkitt Lymphoma Reveals Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 as a Novel Biomarker

High-grade B-cell lymphomas with 11q aberrations (HGBL-11q) represent a World Health Organization-defined group of lymphomas that harbor recurrent chromosome 11q aberrations involving proximal gains and telomeric losses. Although a limited number of HGBL-11q cases evaluated thus far appear to show a similar course and prognosis as Burkitt lymphoma (BL), many molecular differences have been appreciated, most notably the absence of MYC rearrangement. Despite biological differences between BL and HGBL-11q, histomorphologic and immunophenotypic distinction remains challenging. Here, we provide a comparative whole proteomic profile of BL- and HGBL-11q-derived cell lines, identifying numerous shared and differentially expressed proteins. Transcriptome profiling performed on paraffin-embedded tissue samples from primary BL and HGBL-11q lymphomas was additionally performed to provide further molecular characterization. Overlap of proteomic and transcriptomic data sets identified several potential novel biomarkers of HGBL-11q, including diminished lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 expression, which was validated by immunohistochemistry staining in a cohort of 23 cases. Altogether, these findings provide a comprehensive multimodal and comparative molecular profiling of BL and HGBL-11q and suggest the use of enhancer-binding factor 1 as an immunohistochemistry target to distinguish between these aggressive lymphomas.

Current Landscape of Ancillary Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia and is a heterogeneous disease with variable patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary technical evaluation, including flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, molecular and cytogenetic analyses, can comprehensively characterize a patient's leukemia at diagnosis, identify important prognostic biomarkers, and track measurable residual disease; all of which can impact patient management. This review highlights the key concepts, clinical significance, and main biomarkers detectable with each of these technical approaches; the contents are a helpful resource for medical practitioners involved in the workup and management of patients with CLL.

Wnt regulation of hematopoietic stem cell development and disease

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are multipotent stem cells that give rise to all cells of the blood and most immune cells. Due to their capacity for unlimited self-renewal, long-term HSCs replenish the blood and immune cells of an organism throughout its life. HSC development, maintenance, and differentiation are all tightly regulated by cell signaling pathways, including the Wnt pathway. Wnt signaling is initiated extracellularly by secreted ligands which bind to cell surface receptors and give rise to several different downstream signaling cascades. These are classically categorized either β-catenin dependent (BCD) or β-catenin independent (BCI) signaling, depending on their reliance on the β-catenin transcriptional activator. HSC development, homeostasis, and differentiation is influenced by both BCD and BCI, with a high degree of sensitivity to the timing and dosage of Wnt signaling. Importantly, dysregulated Wnt signals can result in hematological malignancies such as leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma. Here, we review how Wnt signaling impacts HSCs during development and in disease.

Increased Expression of LEF1 and β-Catenin in Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast is Associated With Lymphovascular Invasion and Lymph Node Metastasis

Invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma (IMPC) is a rare breast cancer subtype characterized by small tumor cell clusters with loss of stromal attachment, an inside-out growth appearance, and lymphotropism. IMPC is associated with high incidence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and lymph node metastasis. Activated Wnt signaling has been implicated in the metastasis of other aggressive breast tumors, including triple-negative and basal-like carcinomas. In this study, we tested whether activated Wnt signaling could be detected in IMPC. Upon ligand binding, the central mediator of the Wnt pathway, β-catenin, accumulates in the cytosol and translocates to the nucleus where it forms a complex with lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) to regulate transcription. We performed immunostaining for β-catenin and LEF1 on a well-annotated cohort of 40 breast tumors and nodal metastases displaying micropapillary histopathology. Strong nuclear accumulation of β-catenin was not observed, however a dim cytosolic and/or nuclear accumulation of β-catenin was sometimes seen in IMPC and this expression pattern was significantly associated with nodal metastasis. β-catenin expression correlated with the upregulation of LEF1 in IMPC. LEF1 expression was detected in 26 of 40 (65%) cases and was specifically enriched at the invasive front of the tumor and in tumor clusters undergoing LVI. Detection of LEF1 expression in the primary tumor was associated with an increased rate of LVI, lymph node metastasis, and disease relapse. LEF1 and β-catenin expression levels were significantly higher in metastases compared with primary tumors. In summary, this study demonstrates an association between the upregulation of β-catenin/LEF1 and the metastasis of IMPC.

Aberrant Expression of Lymphoid Enhancer-Binding Factor 1 (LEF1) in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) is a transcription factor involved in T-cell maturation and is usually absent in mature B-cells. Previous studies have shown aberrant LEF1 expression as a sensitive and specific marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Our primary aims were i) to analyze LEF1 expression in classic Hodgkin lymphomas (CHL) including de novo and Richter syndrome (RS), and to assess if LEF1 can be a surrogate marker to assess clonal relationship in RS, and ii) to compare LEF1 expression in CHL and Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). We included 117 patients: 24 CHL-RS, 66 CHL-de novo and 27 NLPHL. There was no significant difference in LEF1 expression between CHL-RS and CHL-de novo (79.2% vs 87.9%, P = 0.299), or in type I and type II CHL-RS (75% vs 81.3%, P = 1.000). However, CHL showed a significantly higher LEF1 expression compared to NLPHL (85.6% vs 44.4%, P<0.0001). As the Wnt/β-catenin pathway directly regulates LEF1 expression in a β-catenin-dependent way, β-catenin expression was assessed in 76 cases and all were negative. Additionally, no association between EBV-positivity and LEF1-expression was detected. Overall, our findings show high LEF1 expression in CHL, regardless of RS or de novo, indicating LEF1 cannot be utilized as a surrogate marker to suggest clonal relationship in RS. Compared with CHL, LEF1 expression is significantly less common in NLPHL, further attesting that they are biologically distinct entities. The absent β-catenin expression suggests LEF1 expression is independent of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in Hodgkin lymphomas.

Lymphoma of the Lacrimal Sac: The Massachusetts Eye and Ear Experience With a Comparison to the Previously Reported Literature

PURPOSE

To describe the frequency, clinical features, and histologic subtypes of biopsy proven lacrimal sac lymphomas, and to compare these results to the previously published literature.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed at a single institution from 2004 to 2017. Pathology reports, operative notes, and patients' medical charts were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 566 lacrimal sacs submitted for routine histopathologic evaluation, 16 cases of lymphoma were identified. All were low-grade, non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphomas, biopsied at an average age of 71 years. Thirteen patients (81.25%) had a pre-existing lymphoma diagnosis; the average interval between the diagnosis of systemic or nonocular adnexal lymphoma and lacrimal sac lymphoma was 7.9 years (range 2-26 years; median 5.5 years). Three cases of primary lacrimal sac lymphoma were identified. Histopathology showed 3 cases (18.75%) of follicular lymphoma, 3 (18.75%) of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, and 10 (62.5%) of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Primary cases presented with epiphora and nasolacrimal duct obstruction, while secondary cases predominantly manifested as dacryocystitis. All lacrimal sac neoplasms were locally responsive (without local recurrence) to chemotherapy, radiation, or both.

CONCLUSIONS

Lacrimal sac lymphoma is uncommon but should be suspected among patients with known lymphoma who develop dacryocystitis. In this series, primary lacrimal sac lymphoma most often presented as a mass or nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma was the most commonly identified cause of secondary lacrimal sac lymphoma. Distinguishing primary from secondary lacrimal sac lymphomas is important, as the extent of disease and histopathologic subtypes differ, which may affect patient management.

Nuclear PD-L1 promotes cell cycle progression of BRAF-mutated colorectal cancer by inhibiting THRAP3

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the BRAF V600E mutation exhibit upregulation of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) but fail to respond to immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1. Recent studies have explored the intracellular functions of PD-L1. Here, we demonstrate that PD-L1 was highly expressed in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of BRAF-mutated CRC tumor cells and tissues. Nuclear PD-L1 (nPD-L1) promoted the growth of tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistic investigations revealed that PD-L1 translocation into the nucleus was facilitated by the binding of p-ERK. Further, nPD-L1 upregulated the expression of cell cycle regulator BUB1 via interactions with thyroid hormone receptor-associated protein 3 (THRAP3), thereby accelerating cell cycle progression and promoting cell proliferation. Moreover, BRAF V600E-mutated CRC cells exhibited upregulation of PD-L1 expression via the transcription factor LEF-1. These findings reveal a novel role of nPD-L1, which promotes cell cycle progression in an immune-independent manner in BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Our study provides novel insight into the mechanisms underlying BRAF V600E-mutated CRC progression.

The Relevance of Additional Immunohistochemical Markers on the Differential Diagnosis of Small B-Cell Lymphomas: A Case-control Study

Objective:

Clinical and pathological differential diagnosis of small B-cell lymphomas (SBCLs) is still controversial and may be difficult due to their overlapping morphology, phenotype, and differentiation to plasma cells. We aimed to examine the expression of the immune receptor translocation-associated protein 1 (IRTA1), myeloid cell nuclear differentiation antigen (MNDA), lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF1), and stathmin 1 (STMN1) markers in SBCL cases involving different sites that may have plasma cell differentiation.

Materials and Methods:

We studied 154 tissue samples with lymphoma involvement from 116 patients and evaluated the staining distribution of the markers. Expressions were evaluated in 21 chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), 7 follicular lymphoma (FL), 14 nodal marginal zone lymphoma, 17 extranodal marginal zone lymphoma, 55 splenic marginal zone lymphoma, 22 marginal zone lymphoma-not otherwise specified, and 18 lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia cases by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

The results confirmed that LEF1 was the most sensitive and specific marker for CLL/SLL and STMN1 was the most sensitive and specific marker for FL (p<0.001). MNDA and IRTA1 were useful markers to distinguish marginal zone lymphomas.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that LEF1 for CLL/SLL and STMN1 for FL are reliable markers. LEF1, MNDA, STMN1, and IRTA1 are helpful with other routinely used immunohistochemical markers in a diagnostic algorithm considering their limitations.

Characterization of GECPAR, a noncoding RNA that regulates the transcriptional program of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Enhancers are regulatory regions of DNA, which play a key role in cell-type specific differentiation and development. Most active enhancers are transcribed into enhancer RNA (eRNA) that can regulate transcription of target genes by means of in cis as well as in trans action. eRNA stabilize contacts between distal genomic regions and mediate the interaction of DNA with master transcription factors. Here, we characterized an enhancer eRNA, GECPAR (germinal center proliferative adapter RNA), which is specifically transcribed in normal and neoplastic germinal center B cells from the super-enhancer of POU2AF1, a key regulatory gene of the germinal center reaction. Using diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell line models, we demonstrated the tumor suppressor activity of GECPAR, which is mediated via its transcriptional regulation of proliferation and differentiation genes, particularly MYC and the Wnt pathway.

Striking Association of Lymphoid Enhancing Factor (LEF1) Overexpression and DUSP22 Rearrangements in Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) are broadly classified into ALK-positive and ALK-negative. ALK-negative ALCL is composed of DUSP22-rearranged, TP63-rearranged, and triple-negative cases. While lymphoid enhancer-binding factor (LEF1) plays a crucial role in T-cell maturation, limited data exist on its expression in T-cell lymphomas, including ALCL. We characterized the expression of LEF1 in ALCL by immunohistochemistry. LEF1 nuclear expression in the neoplastic cells was graded as negative (0), weak (1+), intermediate (2+), or strong (3+), with the percentage of LEF1-positive neoplastic cells recorded. A total of 45 ALCL cases were evaluated, of which 16 were DUSP22-rearranged. About 93.8% (15/16) DUSP22-rearranged cases showed strong expression of LEF1 in >75% tumor cells, compared with 3.4% (1/29) non-DUSP22-rearranged ALCL (P<0.0001). The striking association of LEF1 protein overexpression with DUPS22 rearrangement in ALCL was further confirmed by a gene expression profiling study which revealed significantly higher LEF1 expression in DUSP22-rearranged ALCL compared with other ALCL subtypes (P=0.0001). Although LEF1 is a nuclear mediator of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, CTNNB1 RNA and protein levels were not overexpressed in LEF1-positive cases, suggesting the LEF1 overexpression in ALCL may not be involved in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. The strong and uniform LEF1 expression pattern has a high positive predictive value (93.8%) and high negative predictive value (96%) for DUSP22 rearrangement in ALK-negative ALCL. The combination of characteristic morphologic and molecular features of DUSP22-rearranged cases with the high LEF1 expression further emphasizes that DUSP22-rearranged ALCL represents a distinct clinicopathologic subset of ALCL.

High expression of LEF1 correlates with poor prognosis in solid tumors, but not blood tumors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previously published studies have indicated that lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF1) expression could be recognized as a valuable biomarker to evaluate clinical outcome for various types of malignant cancer, but the results remained controversial. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to pool the published estimates and discuss the relationship of LEF1 expression with cancer prognosis.

METHODS

Five electronic databases Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang were systematically searched for eligible literatures. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the included studies were combined to estimate the effect of LEF1 expression on cancer patients' survival.

RESULTS

Eleven original studies met the criteria and were enrolled for analysis. The results indicated that compared with patients in low LEF1 expression group, patients in high LEF1 expression group tended to have shorter overall survival (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.06-2.86, P=0.029), especially for patients with solid tumors (HR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.86-3.08, P=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Individual evidence about the prognostic value of LEF1 expression in human cancers was limited. Our meta-analysis supported the suggestion that elevated LEF1 expression could function as a promising biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes for malignant cancers, especially solid tumors. More high-quality clinical studies are warranted to highlight the prognostic value of LEF1 expression in human cancers.

Downregulation of Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) expression (by immunohistochemistry and/ flow cytometry) in chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with atypical immunophenotypic and cytologic features

INTRODUCTION

Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) overexpression has been recently remarkably reported in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and has shown utility in distinguishing CLL/SLL from other B-cell lymphomas. CLL has a well-defined immunophenotype, yet, some cases of CLL demonstrate atypical morphology/ phenotype reflected by low Matutes score (atypical CLL). Till date, LEF1 expression has not been systematically studied in cases of CLL with atypical features.

METHODS

In this study, LEF-1 expression was assessed by two different techniques, (immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry), to investigate the expression profile of LEF-1 in cases of CLL/SLL, in comparison with other low-grade B-lymphomas and CLL with atypical features, including atypical immunophenotype and CLL with increased prolymphocytes or morphologically atypical cells.

RESULTS

We found that LEF-1 expression is downregulated in CLL with atypical immunophenotype/features compared to classic CLL; Chi-Square P < .0001. The ratio for LEF-1 expression in malignant B-cells/NK (by flow cytometry) in CLL/SLL with classic immunophenotype was higher than atypical CLL and is significantly higher in other small B-cell lymphomas (P < .01). Absence of LEF-1 expression in CLL/SLL is correlated (P < .05) with downregulation of CD5, CD23, CD200, expression of FMC7, brighter expression of CD79b, brighter expression of surface light chain, increased prolymphocytes and lower Matutes score.

CONCLUSION

As downregulation of LEF-1 expression is well correlated with atypical CLL, we suggest adding LEF-1 to Matutes score as a beneficial marker to differentiate classic from atypical CLL LEF-1 could also serve as a potential prognostic indicator for CLL clinical course.

Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1): a favorable prognostic factor in adult acute myeloid leukemia in Egyptian patients

Background

Canonical wingless-type (Wnt) signaling is a crucial pathway involved in normal hematopoiesis and the self-renewal process of hematopoietic stem cells. Deregulation of this pathway has been associated with different subtypes of leukemia. Lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) is a major transcription factor of this pathway and plays a pivotal role in lymphoid differentiation and granulopoiesis. High LEF-1 expression has been reported as a prognostic marker in several types of adult hematological malignancies. We aimed to assess the prognostic utility of LEF-1 expression in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) Egyptian patients in continuation of our previous work. LEF-1 expression was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 30 adults with newly diagnosed AML and remeasured at day 28 after induction therapy with the assessment of remission status.

Results

Patients were classified according to median expression level into high and low LEF-1 expression groups. LEF-1 levels were dramatically decreased following successful induction therapy. Also, high LEF-1 expression patients had a better response to therapy with better overall survival. ROC curve analysis of LEF-1 expression yielded a cutoff value of < 10.11 log10 (sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 100%) for predicting poor outcome. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that for every log10 increase in the LEF-1 expression level, the chance of the patient to achieve hematological remission was increased by 2.29 folds.

Conclusion

Our study showed preliminary results that overexpression of LEF-1 is a favorable prognostic factor in newly diagnosed adult AML patients. The prognostic value of LEF-1 could suggest its utility for further risk classifications of AML and potentiality for being a target for therapy.

Expression of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 in breast fibroepithelial lesions

Phyllodes tumors (PTs) are rare epithelial-mesenchymal tumors of the breast with malignant potential. Here, we evaluate the nuclear expression of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1), a transcription factor downstream of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, in fibroepithelial lesions of the breast. Excised fibroepithelial lesions of the breast were retrospectively reviewed, blinded to the original diagnosis, and classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. A tissue microarray (TMA) was composed with two representative cores from each case, including 24 benign lesions, 11 borderline phyllodes, and 8 malignant PTs. β-Catenin, LEF-1, p120, and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry was performed on the TMA, and staining was quantified. The malignant/borderline PTs showed higher stromal LEF-1 expression than benign tumors (P < 0.001). Stromal cells expressed LEF-1 in 100% (16/16 of core TMA) of malignant phyllodes, compared with 73% (16/22) borderline and 27% (13/48) benign tumors. The average LEF-1 H-score was 24.9, 6.1, and 1.5 for malignant, borderline, and benign tumors, respectively. Nuclear expression of β-catenin in the stromal component was more often seen in malignant than in borderline and benign tumors (44% versus 32% and 23%, respectively). Nine TMA cores of malignant tumors without nuclear β-catenin staining demonstrated LEF-1 expression. Both LEF-1 and nuclear β-catenin showed expression in the majority of borderline/malignant PTs suggesting a biological progression of Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation in the stromal component from benign to malignant tumors. Inhibitors for the Wnt/β-catenin pathway may provide alternative treatment options in the future for malignant or metastatic PTs.

YJ5 as an immunohistochemical marker of osteogenic lineage

Overexpression of WLS, an upstream protein in the Wnt pathway, has been implicated in several non-osteogenic tumours. This study represents the first attempt at evaluating WLS expression in various bone and soft tissue tumours using YJ5, a monoclonal antibody specific to WLS, with the aim of elucidating its utility in discerning tumours with aberrant Wnt signalling and as a marker of osteogenic lineage in challenging cases. Tumour tissue sections of 144 bone mass lesions and 63 soft tissue mass lesions were immunostained with the YJ5 antibody following standardised protocols. Subsequent assessment of immunoreactivity segregated cases into one of three groups: absent/weak, moderate, or strong YJ5 immunoreactivity. For the bone tumours, strong YJ5 immunoreactivity was seen in almost all osteosarcomas and chondroblastomas, all osteoblastomas and osteoid osteomas. In contrast, all other cartilaginous tumours, chordomas, aneurysmal bone cysts, chondromyxoid fibromas, most fibrous dysplasias and most giant cell tumours exhibited absent/weak YJ5 immunostaining. For the soft tissue tumours, a more heterogeneous pattern of YJ5 immunoreactivity was observed. Because diffuse and strong YJ5 expression is identified in almost all benign and malignant bone tumours with osteoblastic activity, it can be potentially utilised as an immunohistochemical marker to support osteogenic lineage. If interpreted in the appropriate context, this marker is useful in determining whether a malignant bone tumour is an osteosarcoma, particularly in those subtypes with no or minimal osteoid or unusual morphological features. This marker can also complement SATB2 to denote osteogenic lineage.

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) expression is significantly higher in Hodgkin lymphoma associated with Richter syndrome relative to de novo classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) is consistently upregulated in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and in a subset of large B cell lymphoma. Knowledge of LEF1 expression in Hodgkin lymphoma is limited. In this study, we used immunohistochemistry to survey LEF1 expression in various subsets of Hodgkin lymphoma, de novo classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) (n = 43), Hodgkin lymphoma associated with Richter syndrome (HL-RS) (n = 20), and nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) (n = 9). LEF1 expression was significantly higher in HL-RS compared with de novo CHL (12/20, 60% vs. 12/43, 28%; p = 0.0248). Only a single case (1/9; 11%) of NLPHL showed LEF1 expression. Epstein-Barr virus encoded RNA (EBER) was detected in 17 (40%) cases of de novo CHL and 14 (70%) HL-RS. Notably, we identified a correlation between LEF1 expression and EBER positivity (p = 0.0488). We concluded that LEF1 is commonly positive in CHL but not in NLPHL, and such a distinction may be helpful in this differential diagnosis. The higher frequency of LEF1 upregulation in HL-RS relative to de novo CHL suggests that these neoplasms might have different underlying pathogenic mechanisms and warrants further investigation.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 in CD5-Positive Marginal Zone, Lymphoplasmacytic, and Follicular Lymphomas

OBJECTIVES

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) is expressed in most cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and has shown utility in distinguishing CLL/SLL from other small B-cell lymphomas. LEF1 expression has not been systematically studied in CD5-positive marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs), lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPLs), and follicular lymphomas (FLs). We evaluated whether these cases lacked LEF1, helping to distinguish them from CLL/SLL.

METHODS

MZLs, LPLs, and FLs expressing CD5 were retrospectively studied for expression of LEF1 by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

LEF1 was absent in 17 of 18 CD5-positive lymphomas including 13 MZLs (2 nodal, 3 splenic, and 8 mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphomas), 3 LPLs, and 1 of 2 FLs. One grade 3A CD5-positive FL expressed LEF1 in a majority of tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

LEF1 is not expressed in most CD5-positive MZLs and LPLs; therefore, it is a reliable marker for distinguishing them from CLL/SLL. LEF1 may be expressed in CD5-positive FLs.

Composite Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma and Mantle Cell Lymphoma; Small Cell Variant: A Real Diagnostic Challenge. Case Presentation and Review of Literature

Patient: Male, 57-year-old

Final Diagnosis: CLL/SLL and MCL composit lymphoma

Symptoms: Abdominal pain

Medication:—

Clinical Procedure: BM examination

Specialty: Hematology

Lymphomas of the head and neck region: an update

The field of haematopathology is rapidly evolving and for the non-specialized pathologist receiving a specimen with the possibility of a lymphoid malignancy may be a daunting experience. The coincidence of the publication, in 2017, of the WHO monographies on head and neck and haematopoietic and lymphoid tumours prompted us to write this review. Although not substantially different from lymphomas elsewhere, lymphomas presenting in this region pose some specific problems and these are central to the review. In addition, differences in subtype frequency and morphological variations within the same entity are discussed. The difficulty in diagnosis related to some specimens led us to briefly mention common subtypes of systemic lymphomas presenting in the head and neck region.

The current role of clinical flow cytometry in the evaluation of mature B-cell neoplasms

Flow cytometry (FC) has a well-established role in the diagnostic evaluation of mature B-cell neoplasms. Effective assessment for lineage associated antigens, aberrant antigen expression, and immunoglobulin light chain restriction requires a well-designed, optimized, and controlled FC assay. However, it is important for hematopathologists to know when flow cytometry has a more limited role, and other modalities, such as immunohistochemistry, cytogenetic and molecular testing, are more important. This review will discuss the features of an optimal FC assay for the evaluation of mature B-cell neoplasms, and the current role of FC in the diagnosis and sub-classification, prognostic assessment, identification of therapeutic targets, and assessment for disease response to therapy. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by transcription factor LEF-1 is independent of β-catenin

Transcription factor lymphoid-enhancer-binding factor 1 (LEF-1) is a key molecule in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Slug is one of the Wnt/β-catenin target genes and can induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Previously, we have shown that not only wild-type LEF-1 but also LEF-1 lacking the amino-terminal β-catenin-binding region can induce EMT, suggesting that LEF-1 acts independently of β-catenin. Because it has been reported that LEF-1 interacts with β-catenin outside the amino-terminal domain, namely, in the middle part of the molecule, the possible participation of β-catenin has not been formally ruled out. To determine the involvement of β-catenin in the LEF-1-induced EMT, we produced MDCK cells with a deletion of the β-catenin gene and then expressed LEF-1 in the cells. We found that LEF-1 induced EMT in those cells. In the absence of β-catenin, γ-catenin has been shown to take over the role of β-catenin. To examine this possibility, we first established MDCK cells with a double knockout of β-catenin and γ-catenin genes and then expressed LEF-1 in these cells. We found that LEF-1 can induce EMT in these cells; therefore, we conclude that neither β-catenin nor γ-catenin expression is necessary for the LEF-1-mediated induction of EMT.

CD200 expression in mantle cell lymphoma identifies a unique subgroup of patients with frequent IGHV mutations, absence of SOX11 expression, and an indolent clinical course

CD200, a marker currently utilized in the diagnosis of B-cell lymphoma, is uniformly positive in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and is usually absent in mantle cell lymphoma. Over a 6 year-period, of 668 mantle cell lymphoma assessed by flow cytometry, CD200 expression was detected in 25 patients (~4%). All 25 patients had bone marrow involvement; however, 11 (44%) patients had no nodal or extranodal disease and belonged to non-nodal leukemic variant mantle cell lymphoma. Morphologically, bone marrow showed an unusual interstitial infiltrative pattern in 14/25 (56%) and small round cells resembling chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 9/25 (36%). CD23 was positive in 19/25 (76%) patients; and SOX11 was only positive in 5/21(24%). All 4 patients tested showed IGHV mutations. With a median follow-up of 23 months, 12/24 (50%) patients were not treated. These clinicopathological features were significantly different from 154 randomly chosen CD200-negative mantle cell lymphoma patients, in SOX11 positivity (24% versus 74%, P<0.0001), CD23 expression (76% versus 8%, P<0.0001), a non-nodal leukemic presentation (44% versus 2%, P<0.001), and therapy requirement (50% versus 92%, P<0.0001). This is the first study to show that CD200 expression in mantle cell lymphoma, though uncommon, identifies a subgroup of mantle cell lymphoma patients with characteristic pathological features, frequent non-nodal leukemic variant, and an indolent clinical course.

Wnt Signaling in Hematological Malignancies

Leukemia and lymphoma are a wide encompassing term for a diverse set of blood malignancies that affect people of all ages and result in approximately 23,000 deaths in the United States per year (Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30.). Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are tissue-specific stem cells at the apex of the hierarchy that gives rise to all of the terminally differentiated blood cells, through progressively restricted progenitor populations, a process that is known to be Wnt-responsive. In particular, the progenitor populations are subject to uncontrolled expansion during oncogenic processes, namely the common myeloid progenitor and common lymphoid progenitor, as well as the myeloblast and lymphoblast. Unregulated growth of these cell-types leads to mainly three types of blood cancers (i.e., leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma), which frequently exhibit deregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway. Generally, leukemia is caused by the expansion of myeloid progenitors, leading to an overproduction of white blood cells; as such, patients are unable to make sufficient numbers of red blood cells and platelets. Likewise, an overproduction of lymphocytes leads to clogging of the lymph system and impairment of the immune system in lymphomas. Finally, cancer of the plasma cells in the blood is called myeloma, which also leads to immune system failure. Within each of these three types of blood cancers, there are multiple subtypes, usually characterized by their timeline of onset and their cell type of origin. Of these, 85% of leukemias are encompassed by the four most common diseases, that is, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); AML accounts for the majority of leukemia-related deaths (Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30.). Through understanding how HSCs are normally developed and maintained, we can understand how the normal functions of these pathways are disrupted during blood cancer progression; the Wnt pathway is important in regulation of both normal and malignant hematopoiesis. In this chapter, we will discuss the role of Wnt signaling in normal and aberrant hematopoiesis. Our understanding the relationship between Wnt and HSCs will provide novel insights into therapeutic targets.

LEF-1 is a Sensitive Marker of Cribriform Morular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Cribriform morular variant of PTC (CMV-PTC) frequently shows activation of the CTNNB1/Wnt pathway with nuclear accumulation of beta catenin. The utility of LEF-1, also in the CTNNB1/WNT pathway, in the diagnosis of CMV-PTC has not been previously studied. LEF-1 immunohistochemistry was performed on seven CMV-PTC, 52 benign cases and 101 malignant thyroid neoplasms. LEF-1 was scored by stain intensity (0 = no nuclear stain, 1 = weak nuclear stain, less than lymphocyte and 2 = strong nuclear stain, intense as lymphocyte) and percentage of positive cells at each intensity, for a maximum total score of 200. Sensitivity and specificity of LEF-1 stain for all cases and to differentiate between regular PTC and CMV-PTC was also calculated. Six of the seven CMV-PTCs showed ≥ 30% strong (2+) nuclear LEF-1 staining and a total score over 100. Beta catenin also showed strong and diffuse nuclear staining in these cases. One CMV-PTC was negative for both LEF-1 and beta catenin and did not have a history of FAP. All control PTC cases uniformly lacked LEF-1 staining at 2+ intensity. LEF-1 had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 98% for the diagnosis of CMV-PTC. LEF-1 is highly sensitive and specific marker for CMV-PTC, especially when used in the setting of a PTC neoplasm. The pattern of staining is important with ≥ 30% of cells showing strong 2+ nuclear staining having the highest combined sensitivity and specificity.

LEF-1: Diagnostic utility in distinguishing basaloid neoplasms of the salivary gland

BACKGROUND

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF-1) has recently been reported as a potential immunohistochemical (IHC) marker for basal cell adenoma (BCA) and other salivary gland tumors, which may contribute to an increased accuracy in differentiating basaloid salivary gland neoplasms. We evaluated the utility of LEF-1 in fine needle aspiration (FNA) and resection specimens to distinguish pleomorphic adenoma (PA), BCA, basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) as well as in non-neoplastic salivary gland (NNSG).

METHODS

Cases including 66 PA (35 FNA, 31 resections), 12 BCA (5 FNA, 7 resections), 42 ACC (11 FNA, 31 resections), 1 BCAC FNA, and 10 NNSG (5 FNA, 5 resections) were obtained and stained for LEF-1.

RESULTS

On cell block (CB), 51% of PA and 60% of BCA were LEF-1 positive while 91% of ACC were LEF-1 negative. Among resections, there was a higher percentage of LEF-1 positive PA (84%) and BCA (86%), and a higher percentage of LEF-1 negative ACC (97%). LEF-1 staining had a low to moderate sensitivity for detecting benign basaloid neoplasms on FNA CB and resection specimens (52.5% and 84%, respectively), but a higher specificity (92% and 97% respectively), and positive predictive value (95% and 97% respectively).

CONCLUSION

When comparing benign (PA and BCA) and the most common malignant basaloid salivary gland tumor (ACC), positive LEF-1 favors a benign neoplasm. Additional studies with LEF-1, specifically including other rare basaloid salivary gland neoplasms are needed to further clarify the role of LEF-1 in diagnosing these lesions on FNA.

Diagnostic Utility of Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 Immunohistochemistry in Small B-Cell Lymphomas

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have shown that lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1) is a useful marker for chronic lymphocytic B-cell leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Yet, it is not still being widely used in a diagnostic setting. In this study, we document the experience with LEF1 immunohistochemistry during routine diagnostics.

METHODS

In total, 191 B-cell lymphoma cases from Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College NHS Healthcare Trust (London, UK) were investigated by immunohistochemistry for LEF1 during routine diagnostic workup. These cases included both bone marrow trephines and lymph node biopsy specimens. The monoclonal antibody clone EPR2029Y was used.

RESULTS

LEF1 expression was strong and diffuse (>70% of cells) in most cases. Few CLL cases showed a staining in proliferation centers only. Seventy-seven of 80 CLL cases expressed LEF1. Other entities expressing LEF1 included one of 38 follicular lymphomas, two of 33 marginal zone lymphomas, and one diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a background of follicular lymphoma grade 3B. Sensitivity for LEF1 for the diagnosis of CLL was 0.96, and specificity was 0.93.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we could demonstrate the diagnostic utility of LEF1. LEF1 is a sensitive and specific marker for CLL and is helpful in the diagnosis of diagnostically challenging small B-cell lymphomas.

Composite mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Composite mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is rare, as less than 20 cases have been reported so far. However, this entity may be under-diagnosed because the two lymphomas are very similar in morphology and immunophenotype. Previous cases were mostly diagnosed with immunohistochemistry, but flow cytometry may play an important role in the detection of two tumors in the same specimen, thus achieving an accurate diagnosis. By definition, a composite lymphoma is two demarcated lymphomas occurring at the same anatomic site. Therefore, immunohistochemistry is still needed to identify the topographic relation of these two tumors. Our reported case illustrates the pitfalls in the diagnostic process and we recommend two standard panels with new markers for an accurate diagnosis of this composite lymphoma.

METHOD

FACSCanto II is used with antibodies, including CD5, CD10, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD23, CD43, CD79b, CD200, kappa, and lambda. Immunohistochemical stains include PAX-5/CD5 dual stain, Cyclin D1, SOX11, and LEF-1.

RESULTS

CLL/SLL is positive for CD5, CD19, CD23, CD43, and CD200, with dim expression of CD20, CD22, CD79b, and kappa. MCL is positive for CD5, CD19, CD20, CD22, CD79b, kappa, and negative for CD23, CD43, and CD200. Immunohistochemical stains show that PAX-5/CD5 stains the entire tumor population. Cyclin D1 and SOX11 only stain the central portion that represents MCL and LEF-1 stains the periphery that represents CLL/SLL.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the use of the above panels for flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, respectively. LEF-1 is specific for CLL/SLL; and CD200 is helpful to distinguish CLL/SLL from MCL. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Marginal zone dural lymphoma: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and University of Miami experiences

Dural lymphoma (DL) is a rare type of primary CNS lymphoma arising from the dura mater. The optimal treatment is uncertain. A retrospective review was performed on 26 DL patients. Seventeen patients underwent resection and nine had a biopsy. Twenty three patients could be assessed for a response to treatment after surgery. Thirteen received focal radiotherapy (RT), six whole brain RT (WBRT), three chemotherapy alone and one chemotherapy followed by WBRT. Twenty two achieved complete response (CR) and one a partial response (PR). Four patients relapsed (two local and two systemic). Median follow up was 64 months, with median progression free survival (PFS) and OS not reached. Three year PFS was 89% (95% CI 0.64-0.97). All patients are alive at last follow-up, demonstrating that DL is an indolent tumor with long survival. CR is achievable with focal therapy in the majority of cases, but there is a risk for relapses and long-term follow-up is recommended.

Oncogenic CARMA1 couples NF-κB and β-catenin signaling in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

Constitutive activation of the antiapoptotic nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway is a hallmark of the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL). Recurrent oncogenic mutations are found in the scaffold protein CARMA1 (CARD11) that connects B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling to the canonical NF-κB pathway. We asked how far additional downstream processes are activated and contribute to the oncogenic potential of DLBCL-derived CARMA1 mutants. To this end, we expressed oncogenic CARMA1 in the NF-κB negative DLBCL lymphoma cell line BJAB. By a proteomic approach we identified recruitment of β-catenin and its destruction complex consisting of APC, AXIN1, CK1α and GSK3β to oncogenic CARMA1. Recruitment of the β-catenin destruction complex was independent of CARMA1-BCL10-MALT1 complex formation or constitutive NF-κB activation and promoted the stabilization of β-catenin. The β-catenin destruction complex was also recruited to CARMA1 in ABC DLBCL cell lines, which coincided with elevated β-catenin expression. In line, β-catenin was frequently detected in non-GCB DLBCL biopsies that rely on chronic BCR signaling. Increased β-catenin amounts alone were not sufficient to induce classical WNT target gene signatures, but could augment TCF/LEF-dependent transcriptional activation in response to WNT signaling. In conjunction with NF-κB, β-catenin enhanced expression of immunosuppressive interleukin-10 and suppressed antitumoral CCL3, indicating that β-catenin can induce a favorable tumor microenvironment. Thus, parallel activation of NF-κB and β-catenin signaling by gain-of-function mutations in CARMA1 augments WNT stimulation and is required for regulating the expression of distinct NF-κB target genes to trigger cell-intrinsic and extrinsic processes that promote DLBCL lymphomagenesis.

Advanced chronic lymphoid leukemia with severe bronchopneumonia: an Autopsy Case Report

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a lymphoid neoplasia with the B immunophenotype, which corresponds to the leukemic form of lymphocytic lymphoma. This entity is characterized, in most cases, by immunosuppression due to impaired function of immune cells, hypogammaglobulinemia, bone marrow infiltration, and immune dysfunction due to the neoplasia and the chemotherapy, when prescribed. We describe the case of a 63-year-old woman with a previous diagnosis of advanced CLL, refractory to treatment, who presented respiratory failure at the emergency department and died soon after hospital admission. The autopsy examination showed a large retroperitoneal mass compressing large vessels and abdominal and pelvic organs; generalized lymphadenopathy; and liver, spleen, bone marrow, heart and kidney infiltration. A Gram-negative bacilli bronchopneumonia with diffuse alveolar damage was detected, which was likely to be the immediate cause of death.

The many faces of small B cell lymphomas with plasmacytic differentiation and the contribution of MYD88 testing

Plasmacytic differentiation may occur in almost all small B cell lymphomas (SBLs), although it varies from being uniformly present (as in lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL)) to very uncommon (as in mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs)). The discovery of MYD88 L265P mutations in the vast majority of LPLs has had a major impact on the study of these lymphomas. Review of the cases contributed to the 2014 European Association for Haematopathology/Society for Hematopathology slide workshop illustrated how mutational testing has helped refine the diagnostic criteria for LPL, emphasizing the importance of identifying a clonal monotonous lymphoplasmacytic population and highlighting how LPL can still be diagnosed with extensive nodal architectural effacement, very subtle plasmacytic differentiation, follicular colonization, or uncommon phenotypes such as CD5 or CD10 expression. MYD88 L265P mutations were found in 11/11 LPL cases versus only 2 of 28 other SBLs included in its differential diagnosis. Mutational testing also helped to exclude other cases that would have been considered LPL in the past. The workshop also highlighted how plasmacytic differentiation can occur in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, SOX11 negative MCL, and particularly in marginal zone lymphomas, all of which can cause diagnostic confusion with LPL. The cases also highlighted the difficulty in distinguishing lymphomas with marked plasmacytic differentiation from plasma cell neoplasms. Some SBLs with plasmacytic differentiation can be associated with amyloid, other immunoglobulin deposition, or crystal-storing histiocytosis, which may obscure the underlying neoplasm. Finally, although generally indolent, LPL may transform, with the workshop cases suggesting a role for TP53 abnormalities.

A global analysis of the complex landscape of isoforms and regulatory networks of p63 in human cells and tissues

BACKGROUND

The transcription factor p63 belongs to the p53/p63/p73 family and plays key functional roles during normal epithelial development and differentiation and in pathological states such as squamous cell carcinomas. The human TP63 gene, located on chromosome 3q28 is driven by two promoters that generate the full-length transactivating (TA) and N-terminal truncated (ΔN) isoforms. Furthermore alternative splicing at the C-terminus gives rise to additional α, β, γ and likely several other minor variants. Teasing out the expression and biological function of each p63 variant has been both the focus of, and a cause for contention in the p63 field.

RESULTS

Here we have taken advantage of a burgeoning RNA-Seq based genomic data-sets to examine the global expression profiles of p63 isoforms across commonly utilized human cell-lines and major tissues and organs. Consistent with earlier studies, we find ΔNp63 transcripts, primarily that of the ΔNp63α isoforms, to be expressed in most cells of epithelial origin such as those of skin and oral tissues, mammary glands and squamous cell carcinomas. In contrast, TAp63 is not expressed in the majority of normal cell-types and tissues; rather it is selectively expressed at moderate to high levels in a subset of Burkitt's and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines. We verify this differential expression pattern of p63 isoforms by Western blot analysis, using newly developed ΔN and TA specific antibodies. Furthermore using unsupervised clustering of human cell lines, tissues and organs, we show that ΔNp63 and TAp63 driven transcriptional networks involve very distinct sets of molecular players, which may underlie their different biological functions.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we report comprehensive and global expression profiles of p63 isoforms and their relationship to p53/p73 and other potential transcriptional co-regulators. We curate publicly available data generated in part by consortiums such as ENCODE, FANTOM and Human Protein Atlas to delineate the vastly different transcriptomic landscapes of ΔNp63 and TAp63. Our studies help not only in dispelling prevailing myths and controversies on p63 expression in commonly used human cell lines but also augur new isoform- and cell type-specific activities of p63.

LEF-1 is frequently expressed in colorectal carcinoma and not in other gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical survey of 602 gastrointestinal tract neoplasms

LEF-1 is a DNA-binding protein that interacts with β-catenin and activates Wnt-responsive target genes. We analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of LEF-1 in 602 gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary neoplasms in an attempt to (1) investigate the utility of LEF-1 immunohistochemistry as an ancillary marker in gastrointestinal/pancreatobiliary neoplasia, and (2) to perform a clinicopathologic and survival analysis of colorectal carcinoma stratified by LEF-1 expression. LEF-1 nuclear positivity was frequently identified in colorectal carcinoma (89/241, 37%) and only infrequently identified in other neoplasms: 11% esophagus/esophagogastric adenocarcinomas, 7% gastric adenocarcinomas, 1% pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas, 4% pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms, and in no cases of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms or pancreatic mucinous cystic neoplasms. LEF-1 expression was identified in 35% of colorectal carcinomas that lacked CK20 and CDX2 expression. In colorectal carcinomas, LEF-1-positive tumors more frequently harbored KRAS mutations compared with LEF-1-negative tumors (39% vs. 16%, P=0.005). Patients with moderate/strong LEF-1-positive colorectal carcinoma had a trend of worse overall survival compared with patients with colorectal carcinomas with weak/negative LEF-1 expression (5 y overall survival, 31% vs. 47%, P=0.15). In conclusion, LEF-1 is most commonly expressed in colorectal carcinoma and infrequently observed in the upper gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. LEF-1 Immunohistochemistry may be especially useful as an ancillary diagnostic marker in colorectal carcinomas, which lack the expression of both CK20 and CDX2. LEF-1 expression is associated with the presence of KRAS mutations and may have prognostic value as a trend of worse overall survival is seen in patients with LEF-1-positive colorectal carcinoma.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: another neoplasm related to the B-cell follicle?

Although there has been increased attention paid to the critical nature of nodal involvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), the B-cell compartment it is most closely related to and its relationship to the follicle remain uncertain. A clinicopathologic investigation of 60 extramedullary biopsies of LEF1+ CLL/SLL, including 29 cases with perifollicular/follicular (PF/F) growth, was therefore performed. A subset of PF/F cases demonstrated inner mantle zone preservation or intra-mantle zone growth. All PF/F and 16/31 other cases contained CD21+ follicular dendritic cells. No cytogenetic, IGHV mutational or gene usage differences were seen between PF/F and diffuse cases. PF/F cases were more often kappa positive (p<0.03) and had fewer involved nodal sites (p=0.0004). These findings suggest that at least a subset of bona fide CLL/SLL is related to the follicle, most likely the outer mantle zone, and that at least a subset of the diffuse cases may represent "later" disease.

Characterization of LEF1 High Expression and Novel Mutations in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Aberrant activation of the Wnt pathway plays a pathogenetic role in tumors and has been associated with adverse outcome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF1), a key mediator of Wnt signaling, has been linked to leukemic transformation, and LEF1 mutations have been identified in T-ALL. Here we found LEF1 is highly expressed in 25.0% adult ALL patients and LEF1 high expression was associated with high-risk leukemia factors (high WBC, Philadelphia chromosome positive, complex karyotype), shorter event-free survival (EFS), and high relapse rates in patients with B-ALL. LEF1 high expression is also associated with high mutation rate of Notch1 and JAK1 in T-ALL. We identified 2 novel LEF1 mutations (K86E and P106L) in 4 of 131 patients with ALL, and those patients with high-risk ALL (high WBC, complex karyotype). These results suggest a role for LEF1 mutations in leukemogenesis. We further explored the effect of the mutations on cell proliferation and found both mutations significantly promoted the proliferation of ALL cells. We also observed the effect of LEF1 and its mutations on the transcription of its targets, c-MYC and Cyclin D1. We found LEF1 increased the promoter activity of its targets c-MYC and Cyclin D1, and LEF1 K86E and P106L mutants further significantly enhanced this effect. We also observed that the c-MYC and Cyclin D1 mRNA levels were significantly increased in patients with LEF1 high expression compared with those with low expression. Taken together, our findings indicate high LEF1 expression and mutation are associated with high-risk leukemia and our results also revealed that LEF1 high expression and/or gain-of-function mutations are involved in leukemogenesis of ALL.