1
|
Dolan DD, Cho MK, Lee SSJ. Spotlighting Structural Constraints on Decisions About Participation in Genomic and Precision Medicine. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2024; 15:87-92. [PMID: 38776221 PMCID: PMC11180498 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2024.2355893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Deanne Dunbar Dolan
- Center for ELSI Resources and Analysis (CERA), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mildred K. Cho
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sandra Soo-Jin Lee
- Division of Ethics, Department of Medical Humanities & Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Esmaeilzadeh P, Mirzaei T. Role of Incentives in the Use of Blockchain-Based Platforms for Sharing Sensitive Health Data: Experimental Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e41805. [PMID: 37594783 PMCID: PMC10474518 DOI: 10.2196/41805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blockchain is an emerging technology that enables secure and decentralized approaches to reduce technical risks and governance challenges associated with sharing data. Although blockchain-based solutions have been suggested for sharing health information, it is still unclear whether a suitable incentive mechanism (intrinsic or extrinsic) can be identified to encourage individuals to share their sensitive data for research purposes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate how important extrinsic incentives are and what type of incentive is the best option in blockchain-based platforms designed for sharing sensitive health information. METHODS In this study, we conducted 3 experiments with 493 individuals to investigate the role of extrinsic incentives (ie, cryptocurrency, money, and recognition) in data sharing with research organizations. RESULTS The findings highlight that offering different incentives is insufficient to encourage individuals to use blockchain technology or to change their perceptions about the technology's premise for sharing sensitive health data. The results demonstrate that individuals still attribute serious risks to blockchain-based platforms. Privacy and security concerns, trust issues, lack of knowledge about the technology, lack of public acceptance, and lack of regulations are reported as top risks. In terms of attracting people to use blockchain-based platforms for data sharing in health care, we show that the effects of extrinsic motivations (cryptoincentives, money, and status) are significantly overshadowed by inhibitors to technology use. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that before emphasizing the use of various types of extrinsic incentives, the users must be educated about the capabilities and benefits offered by this technology. Thus, an essential first step for shifting from an institution-based data exchange to a patient-centric data exchange (using blockchain) is addressing technology inhibitors to promote patient-driven data access control. This study shows that extrinsic incentives alone are inadequate to change users' perceptions, increase their trust, or encourage them to use technology for sharing health data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh
- Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Tala Mirzaei
- Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerrini CJ, McGuire AL. An Ethics Framework for Evaluating Ownership Practices in Biomedical Citizen Science. CITIZEN SCIENCE : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2022; 7:48. [PMID: 37275350 PMCID: PMC10237586 DOI: 10.5334/cstp.537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The collaborative nature of citizen science raises important questions about managing ownership of its research outputs. Potential citizen science research outputs include data sets, findings, publications, and discoveries of new ideas, methods, products, and technologies. Unlike citizen science projects conducted in other disciplines, biomedical citizen science projects often include features, such as contribution of personal health data, that might heighten citizen scientists' expectations that they will be able to access, control, or share in the benefits of project outputs. Here, we refer to moral claims of access, control, and benefit as ownership claims, and a project's management of ownership claims as its ownership practices. Ethical management of ownership is widely recognized as an important consideration for citizen science projects, and practitioners and scholars have described helpful recommendations for preempting issues and engaging stakeholders on practices. Building on this literature, we propose a framework to help biomedical citizen science projects systematically evaluate the ethical soundness of their ownership practices based on four considerations: reciprocal treatment, relative treatment, risk-benefit assessment, and reasonable expectations.
Collapse
|
4
|
Samlali K, Thornbury M, Venter A. Community-led risk analysis of direct-to-consumer whole-genome sequencing. Biochem Cell Biol 2022; 100:499-509. [PMID: 35939839 DOI: 10.1139/bcb-2021-0506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing is cheaper and more accessible than ever before; however, the intention to combine, reuse, and resell this genetic information as powerful data sets is generally hidden from the consumer. This financial gain is creating a competitive DTC market, reducing the price of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to under 300 USD. Entering this transition from single-nucleotide polymorphism-based DTC testing to WGS DTC testing, individuals looking for access to their whole-genomic information face new privacy and security risks. Differences between WGS and other methods of consumer genetic tests are left unexplored by regulation, leading to the application of legal data anonymization methods on whole-genome data, and questionable consent methods. Large representative genomic data sets are important for research and improve the standard of medicine and personalized care. However, these data can also be used by market players, law enforcement, and governments for surveillance, population analyses, marketing purposes, and discrimination. Here, we present a summary of the state of WGS DTC genetic testing and its current regulation, through a community-based lens to expose dual-use risks in consumer-facing biotechnologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenza Samlali
- BricoBio Community Biology Lab, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Applied Synthetic Biology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Mackenzie Thornbury
- BricoBio Community Biology Lab, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Centre for Applied Synthetic Biology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Biology, Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Andrei Venter
- BricoBio Community Biology Lab, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koplin JJ, Skeggs J, Gyngell C. Ethics of Buying DNA. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2022; 19:395-406. [PMID: 35854191 PMCID: PMC9463216 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-022-10192-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
DNA databases have significant commercial value. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies have built databanks using samples and information voluntarily provided by customers. As the price of genetic analysis falls, there is growing interest in building such databases by paying individuals for their DNA and personal data. This paper maps the ethical issues associated with private companies paying for DNA. We outline the benefits of building better genomic databases and describe possible concerns about crowding out, undue inducement, exploitation, and commodification. While certain objections deserve more empirical and philosophical investigation, we argue that none currently provide decisive reasons against using financial incentives to secure DNA samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian J Koplin
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, 185 Pelham St, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia.
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Jack Skeggs
- Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Gyngell
- Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wan Z, Hazel JW, Clayton EW, Vorobeychik Y, Kantarcioglu M, Malin BA. Sociotechnical safeguards for genomic data privacy. Nat Rev Genet 2022; 23:429-445. [PMID: 35246669 PMCID: PMC8896074 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-022-00455-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent developments in a variety of sectors, including health care, research and the direct-to-consumer industry, have led to a dramatic increase in the amount of genomic data that are collected, used and shared. This state of affairs raises new and challenging concerns for personal privacy, both legally and technically. This Review appraises existing and emerging threats to genomic data privacy and discusses how well current legal frameworks and technical safeguards mitigate these concerns. It concludes with a discussion of remaining and emerging challenges and illustrates possible solutions that can balance protecting privacy and realizing the benefits that result from the sharing of genetic information. In this Review, the authors describe technical and legal protection mechanisms for mitigating vulnerabilities in genomic data privacy. They also discuss how these protections are dependent on the context of data use such as in research, health care, direct-to-consumer testing or forensic investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Wan
- Center for Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - James W Hazel
- Center for Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.,Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.,Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Murat Kantarcioglu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA
| | - Bradley A Malin
- Center for Genetic Privacy and Identity in Community Settings, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. .,Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. .,Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wan Z, Vorobeychik Y, Xia W, Liu Y, Wooders M, Guo J, Yin Z, Clayton EW, Kantarcioglu M, Malin BA. Using game theory to thwart multistage privacy intrusions when sharing data. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2021; 7:eabe9986. [PMID: 34890225 PMCID: PMC8664254 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abe9986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Person-specific biomedical data are now widely collected, but its sharing raises privacy concerns, specifically about the re-identification of seemingly anonymous records. Formal re-identification risk assessment frameworks can inform decisions about whether and how to share data; current techniques, however, focus on scenarios where the data recipients use only one resource for re-identification purposes. This is a concern because recent attacks show that adversaries can access multiple resources, combining them in a stage-wise manner, to enhance the chance of an attack’s success. In this work, we represent a re-identification game using a two-player Stackelberg game of perfect information, which can be applied to assess risk, and suggest an optimal data sharing strategy based on a privacy-utility tradeoff. We report on experiments with large-scale genomic datasets to show that, using game theoretic models accounting for adversarial capabilities to launch multistage attacks, most data can be effectively shared with low re-identification risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyu Wan
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Yevgeniy Vorobeychik
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
| | - Weiyi Xia
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Yongtai Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
| | - Myrna Wooders
- Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Jia Guo
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
| | - Zhijun Yin
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| | - Ellen Wright Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
- School of Law, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Murat Kantarcioglu
- Department of Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX 75080, USA
- Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Bradley A. Malin
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37212, USA
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahmed E, Shabani M. DNA Data Marketplace: An Analysis of the Ethical Concerns Regarding the Participation of the Individuals. Front Genet 2019; 10:1107. [PMID: 31749843 PMCID: PMC6844291 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Personal genomic data and the related health data are valuable resources for both public-funded research, and for-profit entities in development of new drugs, therapies, and diagnostic tests. In order to access to large datasets, pharmaceutical and biotech companies have developed partnerships with public and private entities such as direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies to buy genomic and health related databases collected from research participants and customers. Although individuals mainly support data sharing for research purposes, the for-profit nature of such data sharing raises some questions regarding the rights of the data subjects and fairness in sharing benefits. In response, a new generation of sequencing and data sharing startups such as Nebula Genomics, LunaDNA, and EncrypGen are emerging which aim for leaving the data control in the hands of each individual customer. In particular, such so-called "DNA data marketplaces" allow individuals to receive various types of monetary incentives to sequence their genome and share it with interested commercial parties. This paper aims to provide an exploratory and critical review of the ethical challenges related to establishing such marketplaces for genomic and health data sharing. In the view of the growing number of startups developing such marketplaces, a thorough analysis of the relevant ethical concerns is timely and needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eman Ahmed
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Clinical Pharmacology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Metamedica, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
|
10
|
Villanueva AG, Cook-Deegan R, Koenig BA, Deverka PA, Versalovic E, McGuire AL, Majumder MA. Characterizing the Biomedical Data-Sharing Landscape. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2019; 47:21-30. [PMID: 30994069 PMCID: PMC6730647 DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Advances in technologies and biomedical informatics have expanded capacity to generate and share biomedical data. With a lens on genomic data, we present a typology characterizing the data-sharing landscape in biomedical research to advance understanding of the key stakeholders and existing data-sharing practices. The typology highlights the diversity of data-sharing efforts and facilitators and reveals how novel data-sharing efforts are challenging existing norms regarding the role of individuals whom the data describe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela G Villanueva
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Robert Cook-Deegan
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Patricia A Deverka
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Erika Versalovic
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Mary A Majumder
- Angela G. Villanueva, M.P.H., is a Research Associate at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Robert Cook-Deegan, M.D., is a Professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Barbara A. Koenig, Ph.D., is Professor of Bioethics and Medical Anthropology, based at the Institute for Health & Aging, University of California, San Francisco. Patricia A. Deverka, M.D., M.S., M.B.E., is Director, Value Evidence and Outcomes at Geisinger National Precision Health, where she focuses on demonstrating the value of genomic sequencing for health systems and policy-makers.Erika Versalovic is a Ph.D. student in the philosophy department at the University of Washington and a neuroethics fellow with the Center for Neurotechnology in Seattle, WA. Amy L. McGuire, J.D., Ph.D., is the Leon Jaworski Professor of Biomedical Ethics and Director of the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine. Mary A. Majumder, J.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shabani M. Blockchain-based platforms for genomic data sharing: a de-centralized approach in response to the governance problems? J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26:76-80. [PMID: 30496430 PMCID: PMC7647160 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 10/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Blockchain-based platforms are emerging to provide solutions for technical and governance challenges associated with genomic data sharing. Providing capabilities for distributed data stewardship and participatory access control along with effective ways for enforcement of the data access agreements and data ownership are among the major promises of these platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Shabani
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Borry P, Bentzen HB, Budin-Ljøsne I, Cornel MC, Howard HC, Feeney O, Jackson L, Mascalzoni D, Mendes Á, Peterlin B, Riso B, Shabani M, Skirton H, Sterckx S, Vears D, Wjst M, Felzmann H. The challenges of the expanded availability of genomic information: an agenda-setting paper. J Community Genet 2018; 9:103-116. [PMID: 28952070 PMCID: PMC5849701 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-017-0331-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid advances in microarray and sequencing technologies are making genotyping and genome sequencing more affordable and readily available. There is an expectation that genomic sequencing technologies improve personalized diagnosis and personalized drug therapy. Concurrently, provision of direct-to-consumer genetic testing by commercial providers has enabled individuals' direct access to their genomic data. The expanded availability of genomic data is perceived as influencing the relationship between the various parties involved including healthcare professionals, researchers, patients, individuals, families, industry, and government. This results in a need to revisit their roles and responsibilities. In a 1-day agenda-setting meeting organized by the COST Action IS1303 "Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives," participants discussed the main challenges associated with the expanded availability of genomic information, with a specific focus on public-private partnerships, and provided an outline from which to discuss in detail the identified challenges. This paper summarizes the points raised at this meeting in five main parts and highlights the key cross-cutting themes. In light of the increasing availability of genomic information, it is expected that this paper will provide timely direction for future research and policy making in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Borry
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Heidi Beate Bentzen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law, Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
| | - Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne
- Norwegian Cancer Genomics Consortium, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1130, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway
- Cohort Studies, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Section of Community Genetics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heidi Carmen Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Oliver Feeney
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland
| | - Leigh Jackson
- RILD Building, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
| | - Deborah Mascalzoni
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- EURAC Research, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Álvaro Mendes
- i3S, Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, IBMC-UnIGENe and Centre for Predictive and Preventive Genetics, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Borut Peterlin
- Clinical Institute of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Šlajmerjeva 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Brigida Riso
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), CIES-IUL, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heather Skirton
- Faculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Sigrid Sterckx
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Danya Vears
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Institute for Human Genomics and Society, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Matthias Wjst
- Helmholtz Center Munich, National Research Centre for Environmental Health, Institute of Lung Biology and Disease, Munich, Germany
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Epidemiology and Medical Informatics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Heike Felzmann
- Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis (COBRA), National University of Ireland (Galway), Galway, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vayena E, Blasimme A. Health Research with Big Data: Time for Systemic Oversight. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2018; 46:119-129. [PMID: 30034208 PMCID: PMC6052857 DOI: 10.1177/1073110518766026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
To address the ethical challenges in big data health research we propose the concept of systemic oversight. This approach is based on six defining features (adaptivity, flexibility, monitoring, responsiveness, reflexivity, and inclusiveness) and aims at creating a common ground across the oversight pipeline of biomedical big data research. Current trends towards enhancing granularity of informed consent and specifying legal provisions to address informational privacy and discrimination concerns in data-driven health research are laudable. However, these solutions alone cannot have the desired impact unless oversight activities by different stakeholders acquire a common substantive orientation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effy Vayena
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETHZurich in Swit-zerland where she directs the Health Ethics and Policy Lab. She is also a faculty associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard Law School. She holds a Master's in History and Philosophy of Science from Imperial College, London and a Ph.D. in History of Medicine from the University of Minnesota
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology (Health Ethics and Policy Lab). His work revolves around ethical and policy issues in biotechnology and biomedicine. He graduated in Philosophy and received a Master's in Bioethics from "La Sapienza" University of Rome (Italy) as well as a Ph.D. in Bioethics from the University of Milan, European School of Molecular Medicine (Italy)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vayena E, Blasimme A. Biomedical Big Data: New Models of Control Over Access, Use and Governance. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2017; 14:501-513. [PMID: 28983835 PMCID: PMC5715037 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-017-9809-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2017] [Accepted: 08/24/2017] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Empirical evidence suggests that while people hold the capacity to control their data in high regard, they increasingly experience a loss of control over their data in the online world. The capacity to exert control over the generation and flow of personal information is a fundamental premise to important values such as autonomy, privacy, and trust. In healthcare and clinical research this capacity is generally achieved indirectly, by agreeing to specific conditions of informational exposure. Such conditions can be openly stated in informed consent documents or be implicit in the norms of confidentiality that govern the relationships of patients and healthcare professionals. However, with medicine becoming a data-intense enterprise, informed consent and medical confidentiality, as mechanisms of control, are put under pressure. In this paper we explore emerging models of informational control in data-intense healthcare and clinical research, which can compensate for the limitations of currently available instruments. More specifically, we discuss three approaches that hold promise in increasing individual control: the emergence of data portability rights as means to control data access, new mechanisms of informed consent as tools to control data use, and finally, new participatory governance schemes that allow individuals to control their data through direct involvement in data governance. We conclude by suggesting that, despite the impression that biomedical big data diminish individual control, the synergistic effect of new data management models can in fact improve it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab—Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Auf der Mauer, 17, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab—Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Auf der Mauer, 17, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shabani M, Vears D, Borry P. Raw Genomic Data: Storage, Access, and Sharing. Trends Genet 2017; 34:8-10. [PMID: 29132689 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2017.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Patients are increasingly being encouraged and supported to access and control their own medical and genomic data. We argue that well-established and transparent raw genomic data retention and returning policies are imperative to enable patients to practice their rights to access and control raw data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahsa Shabani
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Danya Vears
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Niemiec E, Kalokairinou L, Howard HC. Current ethical and legal issues in health-related direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Per Med 2017; 14:433-445. [PMID: 29754566 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2017-0029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A variety of health-related genetic testing is currently advertized directly to consumers. This article provides a timely overview of direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC GT) and salient ethical issues, as well as an analysis of the impact of the recently adopted regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices on DTC GT. DTC GT companies currently employ new testing approaches, report on a wide spectrum of conditions and target new groups of consumers. Such activities raise ethical issues including the questionable analytic and clinical validity of tests, the adequacy of informed consent, potentially misleading advertizing, testing in children, research uses and commercialization of genomic data. The recently adopted regulation on in vitro diagnostic medical devices may limit the offers of predisposition DTC GT in the EU market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Niemiec
- Interdepartmental Centre for Research in the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Law and in Computer Science and Law, University of Bologna, 40121 Bologna, Italy.,Department of Law, University of Turin, 10153 Turin, Italy.,Centre for Ethics & Law in the Life Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, D 30159 Hannover, Germany
| | - Louiza Kalokairinou
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics & Law, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heidi Carmen Howard
- Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Roberts JL. Negotiating Commercial Interests in Biospecimens. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2017; 45:138-141. [PMID: 28661280 DOI: 10.1177/1073110517703107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Proposed changes to the Common Rule would require publicly funded researchers to disclose whether a subject's biospecimens could be used for commercial profit and whether the subject will share in those proceeds. Disclosing commercial interests will inform research participants that their tissue may have commercial value, a possibility that those individuals might not have previously considered. The proposed changes may then provide people with an opportunity to negotiate commercial rights in their biospecimens despite the well-accepted legal precedent that individuals maintain no interests in their excised tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Roberts
- Jessica L. Roberts, J.D., is George Butler Research Professor and the Director of the Health Law & Policy Institute at the University of Houston Law Center in Houston, TX. She holds a J.D. from the Yale Law School in New Haven, CT and a B.A. from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, CA. Professor Roberts is a 2018 Greenwall Faculty Scholar in Bioethics
| |
Collapse
|