A case of lactic acidosis induced by linezolid

Preventable serious drug-disease interactions of reserve antibiotics

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics that are used exclusively in hospital settings and reserved for treating infections caused by multidrug-resistant or extended-resistant bacterial pathogens are referred to as 'reserved' antibiotics. The purpose of this review article is to provide a better understanding of the risks associated with serious interactions between reserved antibiotics and various diseases, as well as to present key strategies for their prevention.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EBSCO, and GOOGLE SCHOLAR databases without any restrictions on time or language. Only clinical studies, observational human studies, case reports, and case series that reported serious drug-disease interactions were considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Knowledge of the interactions between reserve antibiotics and diseases, that have actually occurred and then been described in the medical literature, is crucial to the safe treatment of critically ill patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacterial strains. Introducing into routine practice the checking of possible interactions with diseases that a patient suffers from, strict monitoring of changes in the function of the excretory organs (kidneys and liver), and measuring the concentration of drugs in the plasma will reduce the possibility of adverse drug-disease interactions.

Linezolid-Induced Lactic Acidosis: A Case Report

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, is widely used to treat infections caused by gram-positive bacteria that are resistant to other antibiotics. It inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by targeting rRNA. Although generally safe when used for short durations in uncomplicated patients, prolonged use may lead to adverse effects. Here, we present the case of a 66-year-old female with a complex orthopedic history, who developed a prosthetic knee infection unresponsive to other antibiotics. Consequently, she was treated with an extended course of linezolid therapy, which resulted in the development of lactic acidosis despite normal liver and kidney function.

Linezolid-Induced Lactic Acidosis Presenting As Acute Cholecystitis: A Case Report and Systematic Review

Linezolid has gained increased use for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria in recent years. It can cause rare but potentially life-threatening lactic acidosis. Here, we presented a case report of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA), along with a systematic review of current literature. The patient was a 55-year-old male who presented with the symptoms of acute cholecystitis. He had been treated for sepsis due to acute cholecystitis with broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluids as per protocol. Still, his lactate level was getting elevated. After excluding other causes of lactic acidosis, LILA was diagnosed, and linezolid was discontinued. His lactic acid level, as well as his physical condition, improved after that. Studies related to LILA were searched in Medline via PubMed. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, data were extracted, tabulated, and presented in this article. The risk of bias was also assessed. We found 78 relevant articles in the primary search, and 26 articles, including 496 patients, were included in the study. From 23 studies of 129 patients, 28 patients (21.7%) died in the setting of LILA. The peak lactate level in which the patient developed LILA was 38.1 mmol/L after four weeks of therapy. The most common health conditions associated with LILA were end-stage renal failure (ESRD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), etc. Eighteen studies with a total of 30 patients discontinued it after the development of LILA. Twenty-four patients (80%) out of 30 survived after the discontinuation. We recommend including LILA in the differential diagnoses when treating patients with lactic acidosis since LILA is associated with a relatively elevated mortality rate.

Neonatal Cardiac and Respiratory Arrest During Linezolid Therapy: A Case Report

Lactic acidosis is one of the severe adverse reactions of linezolid. Its clinical manifestations are non-specific, primarily including abdominal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, lethargy, rapid breathing, and tachycardia, with no reports of cardiac and respiratory arrest. In this case report, we present a 13-day-old male infant with omphalitis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, who was treated with linezolid. He had lactic acidosis before treatment, which was not severe and was likely related to the infection. After linezolid therapy, he experienced cardiac and respiratory arrest, and re-measurement showed an increase in lactate levels. After resuscitation, linezolid withdrawal, and symptomatic treatment, lactate levels decreased. However, due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and uncorrectable ventricular arrhythmia caused by post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation myocardial damage, the infant died. A comprehensive autopsy and genetic testing were performed after death, and no congenital diseases or inherited metabolic diseases were found. Given that this case was a sudden infant death without typical symptoms of lactic acidosis and linezolid is often mistakenly considered safer than vancomycin in the treatment of special populations, this paper analyzes and discusses this to draw attention to clinical treatment. More research is needed in the future to fully demonstrate its causal relationship and mechanism of action.

Successful treatment of linezolid-induced severe lactic acidosis with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration: A case report

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic. Linezolid-associated lactic acidosis has been reported in 6.8% of linezolid-treated patients. Lactic acidosis is associated with poor clinical outcomes, with high blood lactate levels resulting in organ dysfunction and mortality. This case report describes the development of lactic acidosis in a 64-year-old Chinese woman who had received 33 days of treatment with antituberculosis drugs and 28 days of treatment with oral linezolid for tuberculous meningitis. Severe lactic acidosis was reversed by withdrawing antituberculosis drugs and using continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVH). When the patient's condition was stable, she was transferred to the infectious disease department, and antituberculosis drugs, with the exception of linezolid, were reintroduced. This did not result in recurrence of lactic acidosis. The causal relationship between lactic acidosis and linezolid was categorized as 'probable' on the Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. This case demonstrates that CVVH has potential as an alternative to discontinuation of linezolid alone for rapid reversal of linezolid-associated severe lactic acidosis.

Incidence and Associated Risk Factors for Lactic Acidosis Induced by Linezolid Therapy in a Case-Control Study in Patients Older Than 85 Years

Background: Serum lactic acid is considered a prognostic indicator in critically ill patients. However, studies on linezolid-induced lactic acidosis (LILA) are still limited. Individuals older than 85 years old (very elderly) have limited capacity for organ compensation, and LILA data from these patients are lacking. In this study, we evaluated the risk factors for LILA in patients older than 85 years and established a risk prediction model for geriatric practice.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, blood gas analysis data and arterial lactate levels were monitored in patients older than 85 years during the use of teicoplanin or linezolid. After propensity score matching analyses, we compared the incidence of lactic acidosis between the teicoplanin and linezolid therapy groups and identified the risk factors of LILA.

Results: The incidence of lactic acidosis was found to be much lower in the group receiving teicoplanin than those receiving linezolid therapy (0 vs. 35.7%; p < 0.0001). A duration of linezolid therapy ≥ 9 days [odds ratio (OR), 3.541; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.161–10.793; p = 0.026], an arterial blood glucose level ≥ 8 mmol/L (OR, 4.548; 95% CI, 1.507–13.725; p = 0.007), and a high sequential organ failure assessment score (OR, 1.429; 95% CI, 1.213–1.685; p < 0.0001) were risk factors for LILA. The constructed risk model could be used to predict LILA (area under the curve, 0.849; specificity, 65.1%; sensitivity, 91.4%, with a negative predictive value of 93.2% and a positive predictive value of 59.3%).

Conclusions: LILA can occur in patients older than 85 years after a relatively shorter duration of linezolid therapy. Therefore, close monitoring of blood gas and arterial lactate levels during linezolid therapy in the very elderly population is necessary.

Effect of a serum lactate monitoring recommendation policy on patients treated with linezolid

Lactic acidosis is one of the most fatal adverse effects of linezolid, an antibiotic used to treat serious infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. However, the measures to prevent lactic acidosis have not been well established.We performed a retrospective study to analyze the impact of applying a serum lactate monitoring recommendation policy in patients treated with linezolid.Since September 2011, we have recommended inpatient monitoring of serum lactate levels in patients treated with linezolid at our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they were seen during the non-recommendation or recommendation periods. The frequency of serum lactate monitoring, linezolid-induced lactatemia, lactic acidosis, critical illness, and death were compared between the two periods.After September 2011, adherence to the recommendation to monitor serum lactate increased from 6.1% to 60.1%. No difference was observed in the incidence of linezolid-induced lactatemia and lactic acidosis between the two periods. However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of linezolid-induced critical illness between the non-recommendation and recommendation periods (3 vs 0 cases, P = .044).In patients treated with linezolid, serum lactate monitoring led to early detection of lactatemia, thus enabling rapid rescue. We recommend regular monitoring of serum lactate in all patients treated with linezolid.

Linezolid Induced Lactic Acidosis: The Side Effect, Clinician Should Be Aware of

Linezolid is a synthetic antibiotic that functions through the inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis by binding to ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA). Deliverable in both intravenous and oral form, with a low level of resistance amongst Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains, it is recommended for a wide range of gram-positive infections. We present a case of a male patient who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair complicated by abdominal sepsis due to bowel ischemia; several days after linezolid therapy was initiated, he presented with signs of lactic acidosis. After excluding other sources such as metabolic, hypoxia, or organ damage, the resulting lactic acidosis was determined to be a side effect of linezolid.

Linezolid and the risk of lactic acidosis: Data mining and analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lactic acidosis (LA) is a rare but potentially lethal side effect of linezolid (LZD). However, limited by the study population, the number of patients with LA is insufficient to summarize all the clinical characteristics and risk factors.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between LZD and LA using the reporting odd ratio (ROR) for mining the adverse event report signals in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database from January 2013 to December 2019.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were 6218 reports of LZD as the primary suspected drug or secondary suspected drug, of which 275 (4.42%) reports were of LA. The ROR of LA with the use of LZD was 39.976 (95% CI 35.365-45.189). In the age composition of patients, elderly individuals (aged ≥60 years) accounted for the higher proportion, 42.54% (n = 117). LA usually occurred two weeks after LZD administration (n = 33). LZD was the unique suspected drug, accounting for 37.45% (n = 103) of all reports of LA. The drug with the most frequent occurrence of combination with LZD was 'meropenem' and 'warfarin'.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

The ROR of LA caused by LZD was very high, and the number of reports about LA caused by other antibiotics was significantly different from that of LA caused by LZD. The drug combined with LZD did not seem to affect the occurrence of LA, and the high occurrence of warfarin in the reports deserves the attention of doctors.

BPEI-Induced Delocalization of PBP4 Potentiates β-Lactams against MRSA

With its high morbidity rate and increasing resistance to treatment, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a grave concern in the medical field. In methicillin-susceptible strains, β-lactam antibiotics disable the penicillin binding proteins (PBPs) that cross-link the bacterial cell wall. However, methicillin-resistant strains have PBP2a and PBP4, which continue enzymatic activity in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics. The activity of PBP2a and PBP4 is linked to the presence of wall teichoic acid (WTA); thus, WTA has emerged as a target for antibiotic drug discovery. In this work, we disable WTA in situ using its anionic phosphodiester backbone to attract cationic branched polyethylenimine (BPEI). Data show that BPEI removes β-lactam resistance in common MRSA strains and clinical isolates. Fluorescence microscopy was used to investigate this mechanism of action. The results indicate that BPEI prevents the localization of PBP4 to the cell division septum, thereby changing the cellular morphology and inhibiting cell division. Although PBP4 is not required for septum formation, proper cell division and morphology require WTA; BPEI prevents this essential function. The combination of BPEI and β-lactams is bactericidal and synergistic. Because BPEI allows us to study the role of WTA in the cell wall without genetic mutation or altered translocation of biomolecules and/or their precursors, this approach can help revise existing paradigms regarding the role of WTA in prokaryotic biochemistry at every growth stage.

The risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis: A case report and review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, linezolid is increasingly used in multidrug-resistant bacteria therapy. At the same time, linezolid-induced lactic acidosis has been continually reported as a serious side effect. Notably, to our knowledge, there are limited available literatures that evaluate risk factors for linezolid-induced lactic acidosis, and there is no highly reliable study on the relationship between linezolid-induced lactic acidosis and age or gender. However, clinicians need relevant information to advice on the use of linezolid. Therefore, we report on a case of life-threatening lactic acidosis after 3 doses of linezolid exposure and evaluate the risk factors of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis.

METHODS

Cases of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis reported in PubMed were searched. Several characteristics and data of case numbers and deaths were extracted for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 35 articles including 47 cases were included in this study. Twelve patients (25.5%) died due to linezolid-induced lactic acidosis. At the cut-offs of 7, 14, and 28 days, the mortalities were 27.3%, 20%, and 27.3%. No statistically significant difference was observed according to age and gender. However, the proportion (27.7% and 29.8%) and mortality (30.8% and 35.7%) of male patients were much higher than females in both ≥65 and <65 years old groups (proportion: 15.2% and 23.9%; mortality: 14.3% and 18.2%).

CONCLUSION

The mortality of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis was relatively high. The duration of linezolid use and age might not be risk factors. Gender (specifically, male) might be related to the mortality of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis.

Comparative analysis of lactic acidosis induced by linezolid and vancomycin therapy using cohort and case-control studies of incidence and associated risk factors

PURPOSE

Lactic acidosis is a rare complication of linezolid (LZD) therapy, and its incidence and risk factors remain unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence of LZD-associated lactic acidosis (LALA) and vancomycin (VAN)-associated lactic acidosis (VALA) and investigate the risk factors for LALA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using propensity score-matched analyses comparing the incidence of lactic acidosis between LZD and VAN therapy. We included adult patients administered LZD or VAN between April 2014 and March 2016 and extracted patient baseline data. In a case-control study, we identified the risk factors of lactic acidosis in patients treated with LZD.

RESULTS

We identified 94 and 313 patients who were administered LZD and VAN, respectively. The incidence of lactic acidosis after LZD and VAN therapy was 10.6 and 0.3%, respectively. After propensity score-matched analyses, the incidence of lactic acidosis with LZD therapy was significantly higher than that with VAN therapy [10.0% (8/80) vs. 0% (0/80), respectively; risk difference, 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.03-0.17; p = 0.004]. In a case-control study, 10 patients with LALA were matched to 20 non-lactic acidosis patients by age and sex. Patients with LALA were more likely to have renal insufficiency than non-lactic acidosis patients that were in the univariate analysis (odds ratio, 7.4; 95% CI, 1.0-84.4; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that LALA occurs more frequently than VALA does and is associated with renal insufficiency. Therefore, close monitoring of kidney function and serum lactate is recommended during LZD therapy.

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis: the thin line between bacterial and mitochondrial ribosomes

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid inhibits bacterial growth by targeting bacterial ribosomes and by interfering with bacterial protein synthesis. Lactic acidosis is a rare, but potentially lethal, side effect of linezolid. Areas covered: The pathogenesis of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis is reviewed with special emphasis on aspects relevant to the recognition, prevention and treatment of the syndrome. Expert opinion: Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis reflects the untoward interaction between the drug and mitochondrial ribosomes. The inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis diminishes the respiratory chain enzyme content and thus limits aerobic energy production. As a result, anaerobic glycolysis and lactate generation accelerate independently from tissue hypoxia. In the absence of any confirmatory test, linezolid-induced lactic acidosis should be suspected only after exclusion of other, more common, causes of lactic acidosis such as hypoxemia, anemia or low cardiac output. Normal-to-high whole-body oxygen delivery, high venous oxygen saturation and lack of response to interventions that effectively increase tissue oxygen provision all suggest a primary defect in oxygen use at the mitochondrial level. During prolonged therapy with linezolid, blood drug and lactate levels should be regularly monitored. The current standard-of-care treatment of linezolid-induced lactic acidosis consists of drug withdrawal to reverse mitochondrial intoxication and intercurrent life support.

Lactic Acidosis Induced by Linezolid Mimics Symptoms of an Acute Intracranial Bleed: A Case Report and Literature Review

Lactic acidosis is common and most often associated with disturbed acid-base balance. Rarely, it can be a life-threatening medication side effect. Hence, determining the etiology of lactic acidosis early in patients is paramount in choosing the correct therapeutic intervention. Although lactic acidosis as an adverse drug reaction of linezolid is a well-recognized and documented clinical entity, the occurrence of such mimicking an acute intracranial bleed has not been reported to our knowledge. The following case is presented as an example of such an occurrence. A 67-year-old woman presented to the emergency department for lethargy, nausea and syncope. The head CT did not demonstrate any bleeding or mass effect, but lab results were significant for elevated lactic acid. The patient recently underwent left total hip replacement surgery, which was complicated by a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. She received 6 weeks of oral linezolid therapy. And upon learning that key part of her history, the linezolid was discontinued. Her lactic acid rapidly normalized and she was discharged home. Several publications demonstrate that linezolid induces lactic acidosis by disrupting crucial mitochondrial functions. It is essential that clinicians are aware that linezolid can cause lactic acidosis. And, the important reminder is that adverse drug reactions can often mimic common diseases. If it is not recognized early, ominous clinical consequences may occur. In conclusion, linezolid should be suspected and included in the differential diagnosis if lactic acidosis exists with an uncommon clinical picture.

Linezolid Trough Concentrations Correlate with Mitochondrial Toxicity-Related Adverse Events in the Treatment of Chronic Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Long-term linezolid use is limited by mitochondrial toxicity-associated adverse events (AEs). Within a prospective, randomized controlled trial of linezolid to treat chronic extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis, we serially monitored the translational competence of mitochondria isolated from peripheral blood of participants by determining the cytochrome c oxidase/citrate synthase activity ratio. We compared this ratio with AEs associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. Linezolid trough concentrations were determined for 38 participants at both 600 mg and 300 mg doses. Those on 600 mg had a significantly higher risk of AE than those on 300 mg (HR 3·10, 95% CI 1·23-7 · 86). Mean mitochondrial function levels were significantly higher in patients before starting linezolid compared to their concentrations on 300 mg (P = 0·004) or 600 mg (P < 0·0001). Increasing mean linezolid trough concentrations were associated with lower mitochondrial function levels (Spearman's ρ = - 0.48; P = 0.005). Mitochondrial toxicity risk increased with increasing linezolid trough concentrations, with all patients with mean linezolid trough > 2 μg/ml developing an AE related to mitochondrial toxicity, whether on 300 mg or 600 mg. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful to prevent the development of mitochondrial toxicity associated with long-term linezolid use.

A triad of linezolid toxicity: hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, and acute pancreatitis

We present a case of suspected linezolid toxicity in a 34-year-old man with sickle cell disease and line-related vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia and tricuspid valve endocarditis. The patient developed sudden-onset hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, and acute pancreatitis 11 days after initiation of linezolid. All adverse effects quickly resolved with drug cessation. The pathophysiology underlying this triad of linezolid toxicity is unclear, but may be related to mitochondrial dysfunction.

Early lactic acidosis associated with linezolid therapy in paediatric patients

Linezolid, an oxazolidinone class antibiotic, is used to treat Gram-positive infections, including those due to meticillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. In paediatric clinical trials, the frequency of possible linezolid-related adverse events ranged from 18.8% to 25.6%. The most commonly reported side effects are gastrointestinal disturbances, headache, rash and liver function alterations. Lactic acidosis has been reported as a side effect of linezolid treatment, and limited data suggest it may be more common in children. We report on our experience of treating 50 children aged 1 month to years with linezolid. Eight patients (16%) developed lactic acidosis and another eight (16%) had lactic acidaemia without acidosis. Onset of lactic acidaemia (median 1.5 days; range 1-72 days) and lactic acidosis (median 2 days; range 1-13 days) tended to be early. Being an ICU patient and requiring mechanical ventilation significantly increased the risk of lactic acidaemia or acidosis (OR=22.75, 95% CI 4.24-122.09; OR=32.67, 95% CI 5.83-183.19, respectively; P<0.001). All 16 patients were able to continue linezolid treatment. Linezolid therapy was effective (microbiologic and/or clinical cure) in 39 patients (78%). Nine patients died whilst receiving linezolid treatment; the deaths were not considered to be a result of linezolid treatment failure. Two patients who did not respond clinically to linezolid recovered after their treatment was changed to vancomycin. Linezolid use in children appears to be as safe and effective as in adults. However, lactic acidosis appears to be more common, and occur earlier, in children.

Linezolid-induced lactic acidosis in two liver transplant patients with the mitochondrial DNA A2706G polymorphism

Mitochondrial toxicity has been recently suggested to be the underlying mechanism of long-term linezolid-associated toxicity in patients with 16S rRNA genetic polymorphisms. Here, we report for the first time two cases of lactic acidosis due to long-term linezolid exposure in liver transplant recipients who presented an A2706G mitochondrial DNA polymorphism.