Second cancer in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN-K). A nested case-control study

Real-world status of treatment for lymphoid neoplasms developed during the course of myeloproliferative neoplasms in Japan

OBJECTIVES

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are at higher risk of developing secondary malignancies. In this study, we focused on patients with MPNs that complicated lymphoid neoplasms. To analyze the real-world status of lymphoid neoplasm treatment in patients with pre-existing MPNs in Japan, we conducted a multicenter retrospective study.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to collect the data on patients who were first diagnosed with either polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia or myelofibrosis and who later were complicated with lymphoid neoplasms defined as malignant lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small cell lymphoma.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with MPNs complicated by lymphoid neoplasms were enrolled (polycythemia vera, n = 8; essential thrombocythemia, n = 14; and primary myelofibrosis, n = 2). Among these, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most frequently observed (n = 13, 54.1%). Twelve (92.3%) of the patients with DLBCL received conventional chemotherapy. Among these 12 patients, regarding cytoreductive therapy for MPNs, 8 patients stopped treatment, one continued treatment, and two received a reduced dose. Consequently, most patients were able to receive conventional chemotherapy for DLBCL with a slightly higher dose of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support than usual without worse outcomes. All 3 patients with multiple myeloma received a standard dose of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that if aggressive lymphoid neoplasms develop during the course of treatment in patients with MPNs, it is acceptable to prioritize chemotherapy for lymphoma.

Contemporary Challenges in Polycythemia Vera Management From the Perspective of Patients and Physicians

Although polycythemia vera (PV) is a chronic and incurable disease, effective management can allow most patients to maintain functional lives with near-normal life expectancy. However, there remain several inter-related factors that contribute to many ongoing challenges associated with the management of PV, which this review aims to explore. First, as a disease hallmarked by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway, PV is often accompanied by inflammatory symptoms that negatively impact quality of life. Next, patients often require recurrent therapeutic phlebotomies to maintain their hematocrit below the 45% threshold that has been associated with a decreased risk of thrombotic events. The need to closely monitor hematocrit and perform conditional therapeutic phlebotomies ties patients to the healthcare system, thereby limiting their autonomy. Furthermore, many patients describe therapeutic phlebotomies as burdensome and the procedure is often poorly tolerated, further contributing to quality-of-life decline. Phlebotomy needs can be reduced by utilizing cytoreductive therapy; however, standard first-line cytoreductive options (i.e., hydroxyurea and interferon) have not been shown to significantly improve symptom burden. Collectively, current PV management, while reducing thrombotic risk, often has a negative impact on patient quality of life. As researchers continue to advance towards the goal of developing a disease-modifying therapy for patients with PV, pursuit of nearer-term opportunities to shift the current treatment paradigm towards improving symptoms without compromising quality of life is also warranted, for example, by reducing or eliminating the frequent use of phlebotomy.

Advances with janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms: an update of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The hallmark discovery of hyperactivation of the janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway was a sentinel moment in the history of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). This finding paved the way for the development of JAK inhibitors, which now represent the foundation of myelofibrosis therapy. With four JAK inhibitors now approved for myelofibrosis, awareness of their clinical efficacy and safety data and recognition of their unique pharmacologic attributes are of critical importance. Additionally, ruxolitinib represents an integral part of the therapeutic arsenal for polycythemia vera.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a broad overview of the published literature supporting JAK inhibitor therapy for MPNs. Primarily focusing on myelofibrosis, each of the four available JAK inhibitors is reviewed in detail, including pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data. Failure of JAK inhibitors and future directions in JAK inhibitor therapy are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

JAK inhibitors revolutionized the treatment of MPNs and have dramatically improved patient outcomes. However, data informing selection between currently available JAK inhibitors is limited. These agents are not curative and eventually fail most patients with myelofibrosis. Combining JAK inhibitors with novel targeted agents appears to be the most promising path to further improve outcomes.

Real-life use of ropeg-interferon α2b in polycythemia vera: patient selection and clinical outcomes

Ropeginterferon-alfa2b (ropegIFNα2b) is a long-acting IFN formulation with broad FDA/EMA approval as a therapy of polycythemia vera (PV) with no symptomatic splenomegaly. There is currently lack of information on the real-world patient selection, including the impact of local reimbursement policies, and drug management, particularly: type/timing of screening and follow-up tests; absolute/relative contraindications to therapy; ropegIFNα2b dose and combinations with hydroxyurea. As a sub-analysis of the PV-ARC retrospective study (NCT06134102), we here report our monocenter experience with ropegIFNα2b in the period from January 2021, corresponding to drug availability outside clinical trial, and December 2023. Among the 149 patients with EMA/FDA indication, only 55 (36.9%) met the local reimbursement criteria and 18 (12.1%) received ropegIFNα2b. Thanks to appropriate screening, relative/absolute contraindications to ropegIFNα2b were detected and managed in a multidisciplinary manner. Efficacy and safety of ropegIFNα2b was confirmed, with 3 cases of early molecular response. General use of low ropegIFNα2b dose, with frequent need for hydroxyurea combinations, was noted. This real-world experience suggests a significant impact of local regulations on drug prescription and the need for greater real-world data collection on ropegIFNα2b in PV patients. Also, it describes appropriate multidisciplinary screening and monitoring procedures during ropegIFNα2b therapy.

The molecular landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with splanchnic vein thrombosis: Current perspective

BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are classically represented by polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis. BCR::ABL1-negative MPNs are significantly associated with morbidity and mortality related to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events. They show a consistent association with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), either represented by the portal, mesenteric or splenic vein thrombosis, or Budd-Chiari Syndrome. SVT is also a frequent presenting manifestation of MPN. MPNs associated with SVT show a predilection for younger women, high association with JAK2V617F mutation, low JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (generally <10 %), and low rates of CALR, MPL, or JAK2 exon 12 mutations. Next-Generation Sequencing techniques have contributed to deepening our knowledge of the molecular landscape of such cases, with potential diagnostic and prognostic implications. In this narrative review, we analyze the current perspective on the molecular background of MPN associated with SVT, pointing as well future directions in this field.

Polycythemia Vera: Barriers to and Strategies for Optimal Management

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by impaired quality of life and severe complications. Despite the increasingly in-depth knowledge of this condition, it necessitates a multifaceted management approach to mitigate symptoms and prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, ensuring prolonged survival. The therapeutic landscape has been revolutionized in recent years, where venesection and hydroxycarbamide associated with antiplatelet therapy have a central role and are now accompanied by other drugs, such as interferon and Janus kinase inhibitors. Ongoing research and advancements in targeted therapies hold promise for further enhancing the therapeutic choice for PV management.

Labor market affiliation of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) suffer from substantial symptoms and risk of debilitating complications, yet observational data on their labor market affiliation are scarce.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a descriptive cohort study using data from Danish nationwide registries, including patients diagnosed with MPN in 2010-2016. Each patient was matched with up to ten comparators without MPN on age, sex, level of education, and region of residence. We assessed pre- and post-diagnosis labor market affiliation, defined as working, unemployed, or receiving sickness benefit, disability pension, retirement pension, or other health-related benefits. Labor market affiliation was assessed weekly from two years pre-diagnosis until death, emigration, or 31 December 2018. For patients and comparators, we reported percentage point (pp) changes in labor market affiliation cross-sectionally from week -104 pre-diagnosis to week 104 post-diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study included 3,342 patients with MPN and 32,737 comparators. From two years pre-diagnosis until two years post-diagnosis, a larger reduction in the proportion working was observed among patients than comparators (essential thrombocythemia: 10.2 [95% CI: 6.3-14.1] vs. 6.8 [95% CI: 5.5-8.0] pp; polycythemia vera: 9.6 [95% CI: 5.9-13.2] vs. 7.4 [95% CI: 6.2-8.7] pp; myelofibrosis: 8.1 [95% CI: 3.0-13.2] vs. 5.8 [95% CI: 4.2-7.5] pp; and unclassifiable MPN: 8.0 [95% CI: 3.0-13.0] vs. 7.4 [95% CI: 5.7-9.1] pp). Correspondingly, an increase in the proportion of patients receiving sickness benefits including other health-related benefits was evident around the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we found that Danish patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, myelofibrosis, and unclassifiable MPN had slightly impaired labor market affiliation compared with a population of the same age and sex. From two years pre-diagnosis to two years post-diagnosis, we observed a larger reduction in the proportion of patients with MPN working and a greater proportion receiving sickness benefits compared with matched individuals.

Evaluating ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) have been used for decades to treat polycythemia vera (PV). Single-arm clinical trials assessing IFN in PV patients demonstrated high hematological and molecular response rates, indicating potential disease-modifying activity of IFN. However, discontinuation rates of IFNs have been rather high due to frequent treatment-related side-effects.

AREAS COVERED

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ROPEG) is a monopegylated IFN consisting of a single isoform, which differentiates it from previous IFNs with respect to tolerability and dosing frequency. ROPEG has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, which allow extended dosing every 2 weeks and monthly administration during maintenance phase. This review covers ROPEG's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, presents results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated ROPEG in the treatment of PV patients, and discusses contemporary findings regarding the potential disease-modifying activity of ROPEG.

EXPERT OPINION

RCT have demonstrated high rates of hematological and molecular responses in PV patients treated with ROPEG, irrespective of thrombotic risk. Drug discontinuation rates were generally low. However, even though RCT captured the most important surrogate endpoints of thrombotic risk and disease progression in PV, they were not statistically powered to fully determine whether therapeutic intervention with ROPEG indeed has a direct positive effect on these important clinical outcomes.

Incidence and risk factors for second malignancies among patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The clinical characteristics and survival of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) with secondary cancer were analyzed to explore the possible risk factors for secondary cancer in MPN patients.

METHODS

The clinical characteristics of 1060 Chinese patients with MPN were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival. The Cox multivariate regression model was used to analyze the risk factors for developing secondary cancer in patients with MPNs.

RESULTS

The 1060 patients with MPN had a median follow-up of 10 years (range 1-50) and a median age of 55 years (range 21-86), and 497 (45.2%) were male. The proportion of PV, ET, and PMF was 52.2%, 33.5%, and 14.3%, respectively. About 28.1% (298/1060) of 1060 MPN patients died. The median survival times of the PV, ET, and PMF groups were 20, 24, and 12 years, respectively (p < 0.0001). In age- and sex-matched healthy Chinese patients, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) value of developing secondary cancer in MPN patients was 6.41 (95% CI: 4.90-9.48). The median survival time was 14 years in the MPN with secondary cancer group. The Cox multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 65 years (p < 0.0001, HR = 5.027, 95% CI [2.823, 8.952]), MF-1 (p = 0.001, HR = 2.887, 95% CI [1.503, 5.545]) were risk factors for developing secondary cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival of MPN patients with secondary cancer was significantly worse than that of patients without secondary cancer. Compared with normal subjects, MPN patients had a 6.41-fold increased risk of developing secondary cancer, and age ≥ 65 years and MF-1 were risk factors for developing secondary cancer in MPN patients.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Polycythemia Vera: Is It Time to Rethink Treatment?

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by excessive myeloid cells production, mostly secondary to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. PV natural history might be burdened by thrombotic events (TEs) and evolution into post-PV myelofibrosis (PPV-MF) or blast phase (BP). To date, no treatment strategies have been shown to have disease modifying effects, so therapy is directed at preventing TEs. All patients require phlebotomies (PHLs) to keep hematocrit below 45% and once-daily low dose aspirin (if not contraindicated). Apart from patients at "high risk" because of age over 60 years or a thrombosis history, cytoreductive therapies (CT) should be given to patients with relevant signs of myeloproliferation or intolerance to PHLs. Approved choices both for first and second line CT are hydroxyurea (HU) and pegylated forms of interferon (peg-IFN), the latter probably being better for young patients, and subjects without critical and recent vascular events or massive splenomegaly. The JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib is the treatment of choice in case of resistance/intolerance to HU, with proved efficacy in terms of thrombotic prevention. Data are too preliminary to consider CT for "low risk" PV cases, but ropeg-IFN is being studied in this setting with a short follow-up. A careful monitoring for signs of evolution into PPV-MF is fundamental for optimizing patient management.

Healthcare resource utilization in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: A Danish nationwide matched cohort study

Few studies have assessed healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) using a matched cohort design. Further, no detailed assessment of HRU in the years preceding an MPN diagnosis exists. We conducted a registry-based nationwide Danish cohort study, including patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, myelofibrosis, and unclassifiable MPN diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2016. HRU data were summarized annually from 2 years before MPN diagnosis until emigration, death, or end of study (December 2017). We included 3342 MPN patients and 32 737 comparisons without an MPN diagnosis, matched on sex, age, region of residence, and level of education. During the study period, the difference in HRU (rate ratio) between patients and matched comparisons ranged from 1.0 to 1.5 for general practitioner contacts, 0.9 to 2.2 for hospitalizations, 0.9 to 3.8 for inpatient days, 1.0 to 4.0 for outpatient visits, 1.3 to 2.1 for emergency department visits, and 1.0 to 4.1 for treatments/examinations. In conclusion, MPN patients had overall higher HRU than the matched comparisons throughout the follow-up period (maximum 8 years). Further, MPN patients had substantially increased HRU in both the primary and secondary healthcare sector in the 2 years preceding the diagnosis.

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

The classic Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) consist of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia and are a heterogeneous group of clonal blood disorders characterized by an overproduction of blood cells. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for MPN were developed as a result of meetings convened by a multidisciplinary panel with expertise in MPN, with the goal of providing recommendations for the management of MPN in adults. The Guidelines include recommendations for the diagnostic workup, risk stratification, treatment, and supportive care strategies for the management of myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Assessment of symptoms at baseline and monitoring of symptom status during the course of treatment is recommended for all patients. This article focuses on the recommendations as outlined in the NCCN Guidelines for the diagnosis of MPN and the risk stratification, management, and supportive care relevant to MF.

Transformation from polycythemia vera to acute promyelocytic leukemia: Case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Transformation from chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm to acute leukemia is a feature of myeloproliferative neoplasm; however, the rate is not high. Transformation to acute promyelocytic leukemia is rare. Here, we report a case of transformation of polycythemia vera to acute promyelocytic leukemia and describe a process of clonal evolution that has not yet been reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS

In this case, a 51-year-old woman was diagnosed with polycythemia vera and concomitant JAK2/V617F mutations in July 2019. She underwent intermittent phlebotomy and oral hydroxyurea irregularly. After 2 years, the patient complained of fatigue and poor sleep quality for 2 months.

DIAGNOSIS

Further examination revealed marked hypercellularity and grade 1 bone marrow fibrosis with the PML/RARαV variant (23.85% mutation load), WT1-Exon1 (37.8%), WT1-Exon9 (4.1%), JAK3-Exon7 (49.3%), and RELN-Exon55 (45.8%). According to the World Health Organization classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with a rare transformation of polycythemia vera to acute promyelocytic leukemia.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent dual induction therapy with all-trans-retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide.

OUTCOMES

After 28 days of induction therapy, the patient achieved complete remission, was compliant and the treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Polycythemia vera can transform into acute promyelocytic leukemia; therefore, it is important to review bone aspiration and other tests to perform a comprehensive assessment and monitor the disease status, to detect disease progression and intervene early when it transforms into acute promyelocytic leukemia.

The Genomic Landscape in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Patients with Second Cancers

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by systemic inflammation. With the indolent nature of the diseases, second cancers (SCs) have emerged as a challenging issue in afflicted patients. Epidemiological studies have confirmed the excessive risk of SCs in MPNs, but little is known about their molecular basis. To explore further, we used whole exome sequencing to explore the genetic changes in the granulocytes of 26 paired MPN patients with or without SC. We noticed that MPN−SC patients harbor genomic variants of distinct genes, among which a unique pattern of co-occurrence or mutual exclusiveness could be identified. We also found that mutated genes in MPN−SC samples were enriched in immune-related pathways and inflammatory networks, an observation further supported by their increased plasma levels of TGF-β and IL-23. Noteworthily, variants of KRT6A, a gene capable of mediating tumor-associate macrophage activity, were more commonly detected in MPN−SC patients. Analysis through OncodriveCLUST disclosed that KRT6A replaces JAK2V617F as the more prominent disease driver in MPN−SC, whereas a major mutation in this gene (KRT6A c.745T>C) in our patients is linked to human carcinoma and predicted to be pathogenic in COSMIC database. Overall, we demonstrate that inflammation could be indispensable in MPN−SC pathogenesis.

Real-world analysis of main clinical outcomes in patients with polycythemia vera treated with ruxolitinib or best available therapy after developing resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea

Background

Ruxolitinib is approved for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but its impact on preventing thrombosis or disease‐progression is unknown.

Methods

A retrospective, real‐world analysis was performed on the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to subsequent treatment with ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (BAT; n = 272). Survival probabilities and rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and second primary cancers were calculated according to treatment. To minimize biases in treatment allocation, all results were adjusted by a propensity score for receiving ruxolitinib or BAT.

Results

Patients receiving ruxolitinib had a significantly lower rate of arterial thrombosis than those on BAT (0.4% vs 2.3% per year; P = .03), and this persisted as a trend after adjustment for the propensity to have received the drug (incidence rate ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.02‐1.3; P = .09). There were no significant differences in the rates of venous thrombosis (0.8% and 1.1% for ruxolitinib and BAT, respectively; P = .7) and major bleeding (0.8% and 0.9%, respectively; P = .9). Ruxolitinib exposure was not associated with a higher rate of second primary cancers, including all types of neoplasia, noncutaneous cancers, and nonmelanoma skin cancers. After a median follow‐up of 3.5 years, there were no differences in survival or progression to acute leukemia or myelofibrosis between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

The results suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for PV patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis.

Lay Summary

Ruxolitinib is better than other available therapies in achieving hematocrit control and symptom relief in patients with polycythemia vera who are resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea, but we still do not know whether ruxolitinib provides an additional benefit in preventing thrombosis or disease progression.

We retrospectively studied the outcomes of 377 patients with resistance/intolerance to hydroxyurea from the Spanish Registry of Polycythemia Vera according to whether they subsequently received ruxolitinib (n = 105) or the best available therapy (n = 272).

Our findings suggest that ruxolitinib could reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis, but a disease‐modifying effect could not be demonstrated for ruxolitinib in this patient population.

Ruxolitinib may reduce the incidence of arterial thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera resistant/intolerant to hydroxyurea.

Diabetes and Second Neoplasia Impact on Prognosis in Pre-Fibrotic Primary Myelofibrosis

Simple Summary

The 2016 WHO-revised classification of MPNs recognized pre-fibrotic PMF (pre-PMF) as a distinct clinical entity from both overt fibrotic PMF (overt PMF) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). In fact, while the initial presentation of pre-PMF is often an isolated thrombocytosis, thus mimicking ET, its course may be symptomatic in a non-negligible number of cases. Conversely, overt PMF patients are enriched in higher-risk categories, thus suggesting a greater propensity for disease progression than pre-PMF. Importantly, median survival is significantly reduced in overt PMF vs. pre-PMF, thereby reinforcing the appropriateness of making this distinction in clinical practice. Nevertheless, a specific prognostic model for pre-PMF is still lacking, except for thrombotic risk. The aim of the present study was therefore to identify covariates other than those commonly related to PMF, which can better define prognosis in pre-PMF patients in the real-world setting, thus resulting in more personalized and efficient therapeutic approaches.

Abstract

The 2016 WHO classification recognized pre-fibrotic primary myelofibrosis (pre-PMF) as a distinct entity. Nevertheless, a prognostic model specific for pre-PMF is still lacking. Our aim was to identify the most relevant clinical, histological, and driver mutation information at diagnosis to evaluate outcomes in pre-PMF patients in the real-world setting. We firstly assessed the association between IPSS or DIPSS at diagnosis and response variables in 378 pre-PMF patients. A strict association was observed between IPSS and DIPSS and occurrence of death. Other analyzed endpoints were not associated with IPSS or DIPSS as thrombo-hemorrhagic events at diagnosis or during follow-up, or did not show a clinical plausibility, as transformation into acute leukemia or overt PMF. The only covariates which were significantly associated with death were diabetes and second neoplasia, and were therefore included in two different prognostic settings: the first based on IPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.34 (1.85–6.04); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 12.55 (5.04–31.24)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.95 (1.41–6.18)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.88 (1.63–5.07)]; the second with DIPSS at diagnosis [class 1 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 3.40 (1.89–6.10); class 2 vs. 0, OR (95%CIs): 25.65 (7.62–86.42)], diabetes [OR (95%CIs): 2.89 (1.37–6.09)], and second neoplasia [OR (95%CIs): 2.97 (1.69–5.24)]. In conclusion, our study underlines the importance of other additional risk factors, such as diabetes and second neoplasia, to be evaluated, together with IPSS and DIPSS, to better define prognosis in pre-PMF patients.

Role of JAK inhibitors in myeloproliferative neoplasms: current point of view and perspectives

Classic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF), classified as primary (PMF), or secondary to PV or ET. All MPN, regardless of the underlying driver mutation in JAK2/CALR/MPL, are invariably associated with dysregulation of JAK/STAT pathway. The discovery of JAK2V617F point mutation prompted the development of small molecules inhibitors of JAK tyrosine kinases (JAK inhibitors-JAKi). To date, among JAKi, ruxolitinib (RUX) and fedratinib (FEDR) are approved for intermediate and high-risk MF, and RUX is also an option for high-risk PV patients inadequately controlled by or intolerant to hydroxyurea. While not yet registered, pacritinib (PAC) and momelotinib (MMB), proved to be effective particularly in thrombocytopenic and anemic MF patients, respectively. In most cases, JAKi are effective in reducing splenomegaly and alleviating disease-related symptoms. However, almost 50% lose response by three years and dose-dependent toxicities may lead to suboptimal dosing or treatment discontinuation. To date, although not being disease-modifying agents, JAKi represent the therapeutic backbone particularly in MF patient. To optimize therapeutic strategies, many trials with drug combinations of JAKi with novel molecules are ongoing. This review critically discusses the role of JAKi in the modern management of patients with MPN.

Safety and effectiveness of ruxolitinib in the real-world management of polycythemia vera patients: a collaborative retrospective study by pH-negative MPN latial group

Ruxolitinib is approved for polycythemia vera (PV) patients after failure to previous cytoreductive therapy, based on durable results observed in phase 3 trials. We report a multicenter retrospective study demonstrating the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in real-life setting. Eighty-three patients were evaluated. Median follow-up was 24.5 months (IQR 14.0-29.3). At a 3-month response assessment, ruxolitinib provided significant benefit in reducing hematocrit (HCT) level (p < 0.001), phlebotomy requirement (p < 0.001), leucocytes (p = 0.044), and disease-related symptoms (p < 0.001). The exposure-adjusted rates (per 100 patient-years) of infectious complications, thromboembolic events, and secondary malignancies were 6.9, 3, and 3.7, respectively. Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) were the most frequent (40%) SM type. Lymphoproliferative disorders were not detected. Five (6%) patients permanently discontinued ruxolitinib treatment and four (5%) evolved in myelofibrosis (MF), but none in acute leukemia. The rate of MF evolution per 100 patient-years of exposure was 2.8. In our experience, ruxolitinib confirmed its efficacy and safety outside of clinical trials.

Second Cancer Onset in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: What, When, Why?

The risk of developing a solid cancer is a major issue arising in the disease course of a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Although the connection between the two diseases has been widely described, the backstage of this complex scenario has still to be explored. Several cellular and molecular mechanisms have been suggested to link the two tumors. Sometimes the MPN is considered to trigger a second cancer but at other times both diseases seem to depend on the same source. Increasing knowledge in recent years has revealed emerging pathways, supporting older, more consolidated theories, but there are still many unresolved issues. Our work aims to present the biological face of the complex clinical scenario in MPN patients developing a second cancer, focusing on the main cellular and molecular pathways linking the two diseases.

Incorporation of novel therapies for the management of sickle cell disease: A pharmacist's perspective

Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience significant disease-related morbidity including multiorgan damage, chronic anemia, and debilitating pain crises. While hydroxyurea has been the primary disease modifying modality in SCD, novel therapies with unique mechanism of action have recently been approved. This review article examines the evidence surrounding the available SCD therapies to guide pharmacists on potential treatment selection and management strategies for patients with SCD. A systematic search of online databases was performed to identify literature on the management of SCD. While the newly approved novel agents have demonstrated clinical benefit it remains unclear how these agents fit into the treatment paradigm. Pharmacists should be aware of the data supporting the use of these novel agents to optimize use on a patient-specific basis.

Updated recommendations on the use of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis

OBJECTIVES

Myelofibrosis is a rare bone marrow disorder associated with a high symptom burden, poor prognosis, and shortened survival. While allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis, the only approved and reimbursed pharmacotherapy for non-HSCT candidates in Belgium is ruxolitinib.

METHODS

These updated recommendations are based on a consensus reached during two meetings and provide guidance for ruxolitinib administration in myelofibrosis patients considering the particularities of Belgian reimbursement criteria.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Belgium, ruxolitinib is indicated and reimbursed for transplant-ineligible myelofibrosis patients from intermediate-2- and high-risk groups and from the intermediate-1-risk group with splenomegaly. Our recommendation is to also make ruxolitinib available in the pre-transplant setting for myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly or heavy symptom burden. Before ruxolitinib initiation, complete blood cell counts are recommended, and the decision on the optimal dosage should be based on platelet count and clinical parameters. In anemic patients, we recommend starting doses of ruxolitinib of 10 mg twice daily for 12 weeks and we propose the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in patients with endogenous erythropoietin levels ≤500 mU/mL. Increased vigilance for opportunistic infections and second primary malignancies is needed in ruxolitinib-treated myelofibrosis patients. Ruxolitinib treatment should be continued as long as there is clinical benefit (reduced splenomegaly or symptoms), and we recommend progressive dose tapering when stopping ruxolitinib.

CONCLUSION

Based on new data and clinical experience, the panel of experts discussed ruxolitinib treatment in Belgian myelofibrosis patients with a focus on dose optimization/monitoring, adverse events, and interruption/rechallenge management.

Risk of mortality and second malignancies in primary myelofibrosis before and after ruxolitinib approval

BACKGROUND

Primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is associated with morbidity and mortality. Ruxolitinib gained US FDA approval for treatment of intermediate/high-risk PMF in November 2011. We evaluated differences in survival and second primary malignancy (SPM) incidence among US PMF patients in the years before and after ruxolitinib approval.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study utilizing the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 database for PMF patients. We divided patients into five-year cohorts pre- (2007-2011) and post-ruxolitinib (2012-2016) approval and compared relative survival rates (RSRs) to the standard population and standardized incidence rates (SIRs) of SPMs between cohorts.

RESULTS

We included 2020 patients diagnosed with PMF from 2007-2016 in this study. There was no difference in the four-year RSRs between cohorts (54 % vs. 57 %, p = 0.776). More patients developed SPMs in the post-ruxolitinib cohort (8% vs. 6%, p = 0.041). The majority of SPMs were hematologic with higher incidence of AML transformation in the post-ruxolitinib cohort (SIR 125.29 vs. 70.55).

CONCLUSIONS

PMF prognosis remains poor in the years following ruxolitinib's approval. SPM incidence including AML transformation is higher in the years after approval. Further studies are needed to determine the true impact of ruxolitnib on population outcomes.

Essential Thrombocythemia in Children and Adolescents

Simple Summary

Among chronic Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms, essential thrombocythemia is found in children with low but increasing incidence. The diagnostic and clinical features do not completely overlap with ET of adult age. A significant number of cases, in fact, do not meet the criteria of clonality, and many cases require extensive clinical evaluation to exclude secondary, reactive forms. Therefore, histological analysis of bone marrow biopsy is necessary, and its use should be enforced. The clinical course appears to be more benign, at least within the first decades of observation, with the incidence of thrombotic events being much lower than in adults (4 % vs. 30%). Hemorrhages are mostly irrelevant. Therefore, the management should be carefully adapted to the individual patient, balancing the risk of future complications with long-term collateral effects of any drug. This review analyzes the peculiarities of the disease facing similarities and differences with adult scenarios.

Abstract

This paper reviews the features of pediatric essential thrombocythemia (ET). ET is a rare disease in children, challenging pediatric and adult hematologists alike. The current WHO classification acknowledges classical Philadelphia-negative MPNs and defines diagnostic criteria, mainly encompassing adult cases. The presence of one of three driver mutations (JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations) represent the proof of clonality typical of ET. Pediatric ET cases are thus usually confronted by adult approaches. These can fit only some patients, because only 25–40% of cases present one of the driver mutations. The diagnosis of hereditary, familial thrombocytosis and the exclusion of reactive/secondary thrombocytosis must be part of the diagnostic process in children and can clarify most of the negative cases. Still, many children present a clinical, histological picture of ET, with a molecular triple wild-type status. Moreover, prognosis seems more benign, at least within the first few decades of follow-up. Thrombotic events are rare, and only minor hemorrhages are ordinarily observed. As per the management, the need to control symptoms must be balanced with the collateral effects of lifelong drug therapy. We conclude that these differences concert a compelling case for a very careful therapeutic approach and advocate for the importance of further cooperative studies.

Co-Occurrence of Myeloid and Lymphoid Neoplasms: Clinical Characterization and Impact on Outcome. A Single-Center Cohort Study

The co-occurrence of myeloid neoplasms and lymphoproliferative diseases (LPDs) has been epidemiologically described, particularly in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, the clinical features of these patients are poorly known. In this study, we evaluated a single-center cohort of 44 patients with a diagnosis of myeloid and LPD focusing on clinical features, therapy requirement, and outcome. The two diagnoses were concomitant in 32% of patients, while myeloid disease preceded LPD in 52% of cases (after a median of 37 months, 6-318), and LPD preceded myeloid neoplasm in 16% (after a median of 41 months, 5-242). The most prevalent LPD was non-Hodgkin lymphoma (50%), particularly lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (54.5%), followed by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (27%), plasma cell dyscrasias (18.2%), and rarer associations such as Hodgkin lymphoma and Erdheim-Chester disease. Overall, 80% of BCR-ABL1-negative MPN patients required a myeloid-specific treatment and LPD received therapy in 45.5% of cases. Seven subjects experienced vascular events, 13 a grade >/= 3 infectious episode (9 pneumonias, 3 urinary tract infection, and 1 sepsis), and 9 developed a solid tumor. Finally, nine patients died due to solid tumor (four), leukemic progression (two), infectious complications (two), and brain bleeding (one). Longer survival was observed in younger patients (p = 0.001), with better performance status (p = 0.02) and in the presence of driver mutations (p = 0.003). Contrarily, a worse survival was significantly associated with the occurrence of infections (p < 0.0001). These data suggest that in subjects with co-occurrence of myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms, high medical surveillance for infectious complications is needed, along with patient education, since they may negatively impact outcome.

Clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, and outcomes of patients with essential thrombocythemia in Japan: the JSH-MPN-R18 study

We conducted a large-scale, nationwide retrospective study of Japanese patients who were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia based on the diagnostic criteria in the World Health Organization classification. We investigated clinical characteristics, survival rates, and the incidence of thrombohemorrhagic events as well as risk factors for these events. A total of 1152 patients were analyzed in the present study. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years, the median platelet count was 832 × 10⁹/L, and the positive mutation rates of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL were 62.8, 25.1, and 4.1%, respectively. Compared with European and American patients, Japanese patients were more likely to have cardiovascular risk factors and less likely to have systemic symptoms including palpable splenomegaly. Thrombocytosis was identified as a risk factor for hemorrhagic events and prognosis, but not for thrombotic events. The prognostic factors and risk classifications reported in Europe and the United States were generally applicable to Japanese patients. Regarding transformations, secondary myelofibrosis progressed in a time-dependent manner, but progression to acute leukemia was low in "true" ET patients. Skin cancers were less common and gastrointestinal cancers more common as secondary malignancies in Japanese patients, suggesting ethnic differences.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in ineffective erythropoiesis suppression as a pretransplantation treatment for pediatric patients with beta-thalassemia major

BACKGROUND

Ineffective erythropoiesis (IE) is the most prominent feature of transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia (TDT), which leads to extramedullary hemopoiesis. The rejection rate in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is high in heavily transfused patients with TDT accompanied by prominent IE. Therefore, a pretransplantation treatment bridging to HSCT is often used to reduce allosensitization and IE. Ruxolitinib is a JAK-1/JAK-2 inhibitor and has showed its efficacy in suppressing IE and the immune system. A previously published study on RUX in adult patients with TDT has revealed that this treatment significantly reduces spleen size and is well tolerated.

PROCEDURE

Ten patients (5-14 years old) with TDT and an enlarged spleen were enrolled. The dose of ruxolitinib was adjusted for age: for patients <11 years: 40-100 mg/m² total daily dose and for patients >11 years: 20-30 mg/m² total daily dose. HSCT was performed in 8 of 10 patients.

RESULTS

After the first 3 months of ruxolitinib therapy, spleen volume decreased in 9 of 10 cases by 9.1%-67.5% (M = 35.4%) compared with the initial size (P = 0.003). The adverse events of ruxolitinib (infectious complications, moderate thrombocytopenia, and headache) were successfully managed by reducing the dose. The outcomes of HSCT were favorable in seven of eight cases.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is promising as a short-term pre-HSCT treatment for pediatric patients with TDT and pronounced IE.

New Horizons in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Treatment: A Review of Current and Future Therapeutic Options

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are aggressive diseases characterized by clonal proliferation of myeloid stem cells. The clonal process leads to excessive red cells production, platelets production, and bone marrow fibrosis. According to the phenotype, MPN can be classified as polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). MPN patients have shortened survival due to the increased risk of thrombosis, hemorrhages, and transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Prognosis is variable, with a shorter life expectancy in myelofibrosis. Currently, drug therapy can reduce symptoms, splenomegaly, and risk of thrombosis. Still, some patients can be resistant or intolerant to the treatment. At the same time, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the only treatment modality with the potential to cure the disease. Nevertheless, the ASCT is reserved for high-risk leukemic progression patients due to the risk of treatment-related death and comorbidity. Therefore, there is a need for new drugs that can eradicate clonal hematopoiesis and prevent progression to more aggressive myeloid neoplasms. Thanks to the better understanding of the disease’s molecular pathogenesis, many new potentially disease-modifying drugs have been developed and are currently in clinical trials. This review explores the most promising new drugs currently in clinical trials.

Anti-inflammatory treatment in MPN: Targeting TNFα-receptor 1 (TNFR1) and TNFR2 in JAK2-V617F induced disease

Inhibition of TNFR2 decreases WBC counts but does not ameliorate hematocrit and splenomegaly in a JAK2-V617F knock-in mouse model.

In a JAK2-V617F knock-in mouse model expressing chimeric TNFR1, anti-human TNFR1 antibody therapy reduces hematocrit and splenomegaly.

Chronic nonresolving inflammatory syndrome is a major disease feature in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Systemic inflammation promotes the growth of the JAK2-V617F⁺ hematopoietic stem cell clone and is associated with constitutive symptoms (eg, fever, cachexia, and fatigue). Therefore, it is being discussed whether anti-inflammatory therapy, in addition to the well-established JAK inhibitor therapy, may be beneficial in the control of constitutive symptoms. Moreover, effective control of the inflammatory microenvironment may contribute to prevent transformation into secondary myelofibrosis and acute leukemia. Given the pivotal role of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) in MPN and the distinct roles of TNF-α receptor 1 (TNFR1) and TNFR2 in inflammation, we investigated the therapeutic effects of αTNFR1 and αTNFR2 antibody treatment in MPN-like disease using the JAK2^+/VF knock-in mouse model. Peripheral blood counts, bone marrow/spleen histopathology, and inflammatory cytokine levels in serum were investigated. αTNFR2 antibody treatment decreased white blood cells and modulated the serum levels of several cytokines [CXCL2, CXCL5, interleukin-12(p40)], as well as of macrophage colony-stimulating factor, but they lacked efficacy to ameliorate hematocrit and splenomegaly. αTNFR1 antibody treatment resulted in the mild suppression of elevated hematocrit of −10.7% and attenuated splenomegaly (22% reduction in spleen weight). In conclusion, our studies show that TNFR1 and TNFR2 play different roles in the biology of JAK2-V617F–induced disease that may be of relevance in future therapeutic settings.

The Development of Primary Effusion Lymphoma-Like Lymphoma in a Patient with Preexisting Essential Thrombocythemia

A 71-year-old Japanese male was diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET) with the JAK2 V617F mutation variation, in April 2011. He was mainly treated with hydroxyurea following which the number of platelets was maintained within the normal limit. At age 80, he was hospitalized due to cardiac tamponade. Computed tomography showed no evidence of tumor masses or lymphadenopathy. Pericardial drainage was performed, and cytopathologic examination of the fluid revealed atypical lymphoid cells consistent with an effusion lymphoma of B cell lineage. The pericardial effusion was completely drained, and complete remission was achieved. Ultimately, the patient was diagnosed with primary effusion lymphoma-like lymphoma (PEL-LL). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of PEL-LL following ET.

Non-melanoma Skin Cancers in Patients on Hydroxyurea for Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Systematic Review

Hydroxyurea (HU) or hydroxycarbamide is a cytotoxic antimetabolite widely used to treat Philadelphia chromosome-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (Ph-MPN) like Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET), and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF). Patients with Ph-MPN are at an increased risk of Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). The cause of this finding remains uncertain. In this systematic review, we would like to know if chronic use of HU in this population is responsible for the sudden onset of NMSC. The results obtained will help the patients and clinicians with early diagnosis of cutaneous lesions and in optimizing the current treatment options for MPN. We conducted a multi-database literature search, applied eligibility criteria and quality assessment tools to the studies extracted, with an intention to include only fair to high-quality articles. We analyzed six observational studies and four traditional reviews. Two out of 10 studies concluded that no relationship exists between the incidence of NMSC and HU. The remaining eight studies indicated the association. According to these studies, the possible risk factors include old age, excessive exposure to sunlight, higher doses, and prolonged HU therapy duration. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation and HU play a combined role in carcinogenesis. Periodic dermatologic screening is essential in these patients. Prompt biopsy and accurate diagnosis can prevent the progression of cancer and decrease the associated morbidity and mortality. True incidence and causation cannot be ascertained due to the scarcity of research on this topic. Multi-center prospective studies in large groups of Ph-MPN patients are recommended to determine the temporal relationship between NMSC and HU treatment.

Ruxolitinib-treated polycythemia vera patients and their risk of secondary malignancies

Recently, there has been increased concern about a risk of secondary malignancies (SM) occurring in myelofibrosis (MF) patients receiving ruxolitinib (RUX). In polycythemia vera (PV), on the other hand, only limited data on the risk of SM under RUX treatment are available. To investigate the association between RUX therapy in PV and SM, we conducted a retrospective, single-center study that included 289 PV patients. RUX was administered to 32.9% (95/289) of patients for a median treatment duration of 48.0 months (range 1.0–101.6). Within a median follow-up of 97 months (1.0–395.0) after PV diagnosis, 24 SM occurred. Comparing the number of PV patients with RUX-associated SM (n = 10, 41.7%) with the 14 (58.3%) patients who developed SM without RUX, no significant difference (p = 0.34, chi square test) was found. No increased incidences of melanoma, lymphoma, or solid “non-skin” malignancies were observed with RUX (p = 0.31, p = 0.60, and p = 0.63, respectively, chi square test). However, significantly more NMSC occurred in association with RUX treatment (p = 0.03, chi-squared test). The “SM-free survival” was not significantly different by log rank test for all 289 patients (p = 0.65), for the patients (n = 208; 72%) receiving cytoreductive therapy (p = 0.48) or for different therapy sequences (p = 0.074). In multivariate analysis, advanced age at PV diagnosis (HR 1.062 [95% CI 1.028, 1.098]) but not administration of RUX (HR 1.068 [95% CI 0.468, 2.463]) was associated with an increased risk for SM (p = 0.005). According to this retrospective analysis, no increased risk of SM due to RUX treatment could be substantiated for PV.

Evaluation of the need for cytoreduction and its potential carcinogenicity in children and young adults with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are rare at a young age, and few reports have described the disease characteristics and outcomes in this group. This study aimed to elucidate the clinical course of essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV) in children and young adults aged <39 years focusing on thromboembolic events (TE) and second primary malignancies (SPMs). A total of 990 patients who were diagnosed from 2008 to 2017 were included by analyzing the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database in Korea. The incidence was 2.53 per 1,000,000 for ET (643 patients; 276 male patients; median 31 years) and 1.37 per 1,000,000 for PV (347 patients; 309 male patients; median 32 years). Three ET patients developed secondary acute myelogenous leukemia and three developed secondary myelofibrosis. The 5-year cumulative incidence of TE was 14.2% in ET and 21.3% in PV. Thus, the incidence was higher in PV; in particular, arterial TE (ATE) was evidently higher in PV than in ET. The 5-year cumulative incidence of SPMs was 2.5% in ET and 2.6% in PV. While the use of both aspirin and hydroxyurea reduced the incidence of ATE, hydroxyurea significantly increased the incidence of SPMs. The incidence of ET and PV was very low, and ET was more common than PV in children and young adults. The high incidence of TE in young patients suggests the importance of thrombosis prevention. However, hydroxyurea appears to increase the incidence of SPMs; therefore, the risks and benefits should be considered.

A review of hydroxyurea-related cutaneous adverse events

Introduction: Hydroxyurea (HU) is an S-phase specific oral chemotherapeutic agent that inhibits ribonucleotide diphosphate reductase. It is the most common used cytoreductive drug in patients (pts) with BCR-ABL1 negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and sickle cell disease (SCD). The World Health Organization lists HU as an "essential drug". Although most patients tolerate HU well, cutaneous adverse events (CAE) are frequent side effects and may limit its long-term use. This has become increasingly evident in recent years, especially in MPN patients, where CAE were previously underestimated and underdiagnosed.Areas covered: In this review, we present the available literature on HU-related CAE in MPN patients. In particular, data from a recently published and so far, only prospective non-interventional study investigating CAE in 172 MPN patients will be discussed in detail and compared with previously available data. Finally, we give an overview of the management of HU-related CAE in MPN patients and provide recommendations on the practical clinical approach.Expert opinion: In clinical practice, HU associated CAE are common and have important diagnostic and therapeutic consequences. Therefore, they should be considered in all MPN patients treated with HU in the future.

Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Malignancies: Daily Practice Recommendations by the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO), the Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH), and the Austrian Society of Hematology and Oncology (ÖGHO)

Patients with cancer, both hematologic and solid malignancies, are at increased risk for thrombosis and thromboembolism. In addition to general risk factors such as immobility and major surgery, shared by non-cancer patients, cancer patients are exposed to specific thrombotic risk factors. These include, among other factors, cancer-induced hypercoagulation, and chemotherapy-mediated endothelial dysfunction as well as tumor-cell-derived microparticles. After an episode of thrombosis in a cancer patient, secondary thromboprophylaxis to prevent recurrent thromboembolism has long been established and is typically continued as long as the cancer is active or actively treated. On the other hand, primary prophylaxis, even though firmly established in hospitalized cancer patients, has only recently been studied in ambulatory patients. This recent change is mostly due to the emergence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). DOACs have a shorter half-life than vitamin K antagonists (VKA), and they overcome the need for parenteral application, the latter of which is associated with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) and can be difficult for the patient to endure in the long term. Here, first, we discuss the clinical trials of primary thromboprophylaxis in the population of cancer patients in general, including the use of VKA, LMWH, and DOACs, and the potential drug interactions with pre-existing medications that need to be taken into account. Second, we focus on special situations in cancer patients where primary prophylactic anticoagulation should be considered, including myeloma, major surgery, indwelling catheters, or immobilization, concomitant diseases such as renal insufficiency, liver disease, or thrombophilia, as well as situations with a high bleeding risk, particularly thrombocytopenia, and specific drugs that may require primary thromboprophylaxis. We provide a novel algorithm intended to aid specialists but also family practitioners and nurses who care for cancer patients in the decision process of primary thromboprophylaxis in the individual patient.

Low-Risk Essential Thrombocythemia: A Comprehensive Review

Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by a persistently elevated platelet count in the absence of a secondary cause. The clinical consequences of uncontrolled thrombocytosis can include both thrombosis and hemorrhage. Patients with features conferring a “high risk” of vascular events benefit from reduction of the platelet count through cytoreductive therapy. The management of patients who lack such high-risk features has until recently been less well defined, but it is now apparent that many require minimal or even no intervention. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic pathway for younger patients with unexplained thrombocytosis, including screening molecular investigations, the role of bone marrow biopsy, and investigations in those patients negative for the classic myeloproliferative neoplasm driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, MPL). We discuss conventional and novel risk stratification methods in essential thrombocythemia and how these can be best applied in clinical practice, particularly in the era of more comprehensive genomic testing. The treatment approach for “low risk” patients is discussed including antiplatelets and the options for cytoreductive therapy, if indicated, together with areas of clinical need for future study.

Second primary malignancy in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib

Ruxolitinib (RUX), the first JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor approved for myelofibrosis (MF) therapy, has recently been associated with the occurrence of second primary malignancies (SPMs), mainly lymphomas and non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). We analyzed the incidence, risk factors and outcome of SPMs in 700 MF patients treated with RUX in a real-world context. Median follow-up from starting RUX was 2·9 years. Overall, 80 (11·4%) patients developed 87 SPMs after RUX start. NMSCs were the most common SPMs (50·6% of the cases). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that male sex [hazard ratio (HR): 2·37, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1·22-4·60, P = 0·01] and thrombocytosis> 400 × 10⁹ /l at RUX start (HR:1·98, 95%CI: 1·10-4·60, P = 0·02) were associated with increased risk for SPMs. Risk factors for NMSC alone were male sex (HR: 3·14, 95%CI: 1·24-7·92, P = 0·02) and duration of hydroxycarbamide and RUX therapy > 5 years (HR: 3·20, 95%CI: 1·17-8·75, P = 0·02 and HR: 2·93, 95%CI: 1·39-6·17, P = 0·005 respectively). In SPMs excluding NMSCs, male sex (HR: 2·41, 95%CI: 1·11-5·25, P = 0·03), platelet > 400 × 10⁹ /l (HR: 3·30, 95%CI: 1·67-6·50, P = 0·001) and previous arterial thromboses (HR: 3·47, 95%CI: 1·48-8·14, P = 0·004) were shown to be associated with higher risk of SPMs. While it is reassuring that no aggressive lymphoma was documented, active skin surveillance is recommended in all patients and particularly after prolonged hydroxycaramide therapy; oncological screening should be triggered by thrombocytosis and arterial thrombosis, particularly in males.

Risks of Solid and Lymphoid Malignancies in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Clinical Implications

Simple Summary

Patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia have an elevated risk of acute leukemia. Recently, it has been recognized that the risk of solid cancers is also increased. In the past decade, several studies have compared cancer frequency in patients with MPNs with the general population. In our study, we present results sampled from 12 previous studies, totaling more than 65,000 patients with MPNs identified through large registries. Patients with MPNs were compared to the age/sex-matched general population. Our results show that risk of new cancers is 1.5–3.0-fold elevated in patients with MPNs. In particular, lymphomas and cancers of the skin, lung, kidney, and thyroid gland occur more frequently. The difference in cancer occurrence is highest in the age group 60–79 years. Our results indicate that clinical follow up of patients with MPNs should include awareness of the increased cancer risk.

Abstract

In the past decade, several studies have reported that patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have an increased risk of second solid cancer or lymphoid hematological cancer. In this qualitative review study, we present results from studies that report on these cancer risks in comparison to cancer incidences in the general population or a control group. Our literature search identified 12 such studies published in the period 2009–2018 including analysis of more than 65,000 patients. The results showed that risk of solid cancer is 1.5- to 3.0-fold elevated and the risk of lymphoid hematological cancer is 2.5- to 3.5-fold elevated in patients with MPNs compared to the general population. These elevated risks apply to all MPN subtypes. For solid cancers, particularly risks of skin cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and kidney cancer are elevated. The largest difference in cancer risk between patients with MPN and the general population is seen in patients below 80 years. Cancer prognosis is negatively affected due to cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and infections by a concurrent MPN diagnosis mainly among patients with localized cancer. Our review emphasizes that clinicians caring for patients with MPNs should be aware of the very well-documented increased risk of second non-myeloid cancers.

JAK Inhibition for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis: Limitations and Future Perspectives

The 2011 approval of ruxolitinib ushered in the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor era in the treatment of myelofibrosis (MF), and 2019 saw the US approval of fedratinib. The first therapeutic agents approved by regulatory authorities for MF, these drugs attenuate the overactive JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling universally present in these patients, translating into major clinical benefits in terms of spleen shrinkage and symptom improvement. These, in turn, confer a survival advantage on patients with advanced disease, demonstrated in the case of ruxolitinib, for which long-term follow-up data are available. However, JAK inhibitors do not improve cytopenias in most patients, have relatively modest effects on bone marrow fibrosis and driver mutation allele burden, and clinical resistance eventually develops. Furthermore, they do not modify the risk of transformation to blast phase; indeed, their mechanism of action may be more anti-inflammatory than truly disease-modifying. This has spurred interest in rational combinations of JAK inhibitors with other agents that may improve cytopenias and drugs that could potentially modify the natural history of MF. Newer JAK inhibitors that are distinguished from ruxolitinib and fedratinib by their ability to improve anemia (eg, momelotinib) or safety and efficacy in severely thrombocytopenic patients (eg, pacritinib) are in phase 3 clinical trials. There is also interest in developing inhibitors that are highly selective for mutant JAK2, as well as "type II" JAK2 inhibitors. Overall, although current JAK inhibitors have limitations, they will likely continue to form the backbone of MF therapy for the foreseeable future.

Use of Interferon Alfa in the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Perspectives and Review of the Literature

Interferon alfa was first used in the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) over 30 years ago. However, its initial use was hampered by its side effect profile and lack of official regulatory approval for MPN treatment. Recently, there has been renewed interest in the use of interferon in MPNs, given its potential disease-modifying effects, with associated molecular and histopathological responses. The development of pegylated formulations and, more recently, ropeginterferon alfa-2b has resulted in improved tolerability and further expansion of interferon's use. We review the evolving clinical use of interferon in essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF). We discuss interferon's place in MPN treatment in the context of the most recent clinical trial results evaluating interferon and its pegylated formulations, and its role in special populations such as young and pregnant MPN patients. Interferon has re-emerged as an important option in MPN patients, with future studies seeking to re-establish its place in the existing treatment algorithm for MPN, and potentially expanding its use for novel indications and combination therapies.

Arterial thrombosis in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms predicts second cancer: a case-control study

Patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) are prone to the development of second cancers, but the factors associated with these events have been poorly explored. In an international nested case-control study, we recruited 647 patients with carcinoma, nonmelanoma skin cancer, hematological second cancer, and melanoma diagnosed concurrently or after MPN diagnosis. Up to 3 control patients without a history of cancer and matched with each case for center, sex, age at MPN diagnosis, date of diagnosis, and MPN disease duration were included (n = 1234). Cases were comparable to controls for MPN type, driver mutations and cardiovascular risk factors. The frequency of thrombosis preceding MPN was similar for cases and controls (P = .462). Thrombotic events after MPN and before second cancer were higher in cases than in controls (11.6% vs 8.1%; P = .013), because of a higher proportion of arterial thromboses (6.2% vs 3.7%; P = .015). After adjustment for confounders, the occurrence of arterial thrombosis remained independently associated with the risk of carcinoma (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.41), suggesting that MPN patients experiencing arterial events after MPN diagnosis deserve careful clinical surveillance for early detection of carcinoma. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03745378.

Drug-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Literature Review

Since myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) pose a significant risk for vascular and thrombotic complications, cytoreductive therapies, such as hydroxyurea (HU), interferon (IFN) inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are recommended for patients at high risk. However, these agents also place patients at increased risk for drug-related cutaneous adverse events. Herein, we review the literature on skin toxicity related to the use of drugs for the treatment of MPN. Overall, the cytoreductive agents used for MPN are generally well tolerated and considered to be safe, except IFN, for which dropout rates as high as 25% have been reported. While IFN is known to give rise to flu syndrome, it rarely leads to hematological alterations. The most common hematological side effects of HU are mild and include granulocytopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib has been associated with cytopenia and a higher incidence of viral infections, as well as increased risk for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Based on the present analysis, it can be concluded that cutaneous toxicity is not a negligible complication of commonly used treatments for MPN. While further research is needed, patients on these agents, and especially those with a history of cutaneous malignancies, should undergo thorough skin examination before and during therapy. In addition, detailed history is critical since many patients who develop non-melanoma skin cancer have multiple preexisting risk factors for cutaneous carcinogenesis.

Risk factors for progression to blast phase and outcome in 589 patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib: Real-world data

The impact of ruxolitinib therapy on evolution to blast phase (BP) in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) is still uncertain. In 589 MF patients treated with ruxolitinib, we investigated incidence and risk factors for BP and we described outcome according to disease characteristics and treatment strategy. After a median follow-up from ruxolitinib start of 3 years (range 0.1-7.6), 65 (11%) patients transformed to BP during (93.8%) or after treatment. BP incidence rate was 3.7 per 100 patient-years, comparably in primary and secondary MF (PMF/SMF) but significantly lower in intermediate-1 risk patients (2.3 vs 5.6 per 100 patient-years in intermediate-2/high-risk patients, P < .001). In PMF and SMF cohorts, previous interferon therapy seemed to correlate with a lower probability of BP (HR 0.13, P = .001 and HR 0.22, P = .02, respectively). In SMF, also platelet count <150 × 10⁹ /l (HR 2.4, P = .03) and peripheral blasts ≥3% (HR 3.3, P = .004) were significantly associated with higher risk of BP. High-risk category according to dynamic International Prognostic Score System (DIPSS) and myelofibrosis secondary to PV and ET Collaboration Prognostic Model (MYSEC-PM predicted BP in patients with PMF and SMF, respectively. Median survival after BP was 0.2 (95% CI: 0.1-0.3) years. Therapy for BP included hypomethylating agents (12.3%), induction chemotherapy (9.2%), allogeneic transplant (6.2%) or supportive care (72.3%). Patients treated with supportive therapy had a median survival of 6 weeks, while 73% of the few transplanted patients were alive at a median follow-up of 2 years. Progression to BP occurs in a significant fraction of ruxolitinib-treated patients and is associated with DIPSS and MYSEC-PM risk in PMF and SMF, respectively.