A practical guide to biomarkers for the evaluation of colorectal cancer

Causality and scientific explanation of artificial intelligence systems in biomedicine

With rapid advances of deep neural networks over the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now commonplace in many applications in biomedicine. These systems often achieve high predictive accuracy in clinical studies, and increasingly in clinical practice. Yet, despite their commonly high predictive accuracy, the trustworthiness of AI systems needs to be questioned when it comes to decision-making that affects the well-being of patients or the fairness towards patients or other stakeholders affected by AI-based decisions. To address this, the field of explainable artificial intelligence, or XAI for short, has emerged, seeking to provide means by which AI-based decisions can be explained to experts, users, or other stakeholders. While it is commonly claimed that explanations of artificial intelligence (AI) establish the trustworthiness of AI-based decisions, it remains unclear what traits of explanations cause them to foster trustworthiness. Building on historical cases of scientific explanation in medicine, we here propagate our perspective that, in order to foster trustworthiness, explanations in biomedical AI should meet the criteria of being scientific explanations. To further undermine our approach, we discuss its relation to the concepts of causality and randomized intervention. In our perspective, we combine aspects from the three disciplines of biomedicine, machine learning, and philosophy. From this interdisciplinary angle, we shed light on how the explanation and trustworthiness of artificial intelligence relate to the concepts of causality and robustness. To connect our perspective with AI research practice, we review recent cases of AI-based studies in pathology and, finally, provide guidelines on how to connect AI in biomedicine with scientific explanation.

Immune checkpoint markers and tumour mutation burden in Wilms tumour: a study of 59 cases

Wilms tumour (WT) is the most common renal tumour in children, and studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment and markers are limited in number. In this study we investigated the ICIs' related immune landscape by examining the expression of PD-L1, PD-1, CD8 and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC), tumour mutation burden (TMB), and correlations with histology and clinical outcome. Positive PD-L1 (SP263) expression was defined as modified combined positive score (CPS) ≥1. A total of 59 WTs (from 2000 to 2017), including eight (14.0%) with anaplasia, from 46 patients were analysed (45 primary and 14 metastatic). Thirteen WTs (13/59, 22%) were positive for PD-L1 (8 primary, 5 metastatic; CPS 1.11-3.42). Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with diffuse anaplasia (p<0.05) and significantly shorter progression-free survival (p<0.05) among WTs with favourable histology (n=39). CD8+ lymphocytes were present in all analysed WTs. A subset of CD8+ cells co-expressed PD-1, which was associated with favourable histology and treatment. MMR IHC stains identified two (2/18, 11%) WTs with isolated PMS2 loss. All six WTs analysed for TMB showed low mutation burden. We found CD8+ lymphocytes in all analysed WTs and identified a fraction of WT (17.8% of primary and 35.8% of metastatic) with positive PD-L1 CPS, suggesting potential response to ICIs in some patients.

Single Center Characterization of a Cohort of Salivary Gland Carcinomas

Salivary gland cancer (SGC) is a rare cancer that can present a diagnostic challenge to pathologists, with emerging, but still limited options for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic disease. We aimed to characterize the cohort of salivary gland cancers in our institute and generate a tissue microarray (TMA) with clinical data available for immunohistochemical analysis. We extracted the cases of salivary gland cancers in our institute and generated a TMA with 72 patients between 2002 and 2017 with sufficient paraffin block material. Follow-up data were present for all cases. The TMA was stained with three p53 antibodies as well as MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MLH1 antibodies. Additionally, we applied fragment analysis based on the Bethesda panel, and the IdyllaTM MSI test to cases with expression loss of any of the mismatch repair proteins (MMR-P) according to our immunohistochemistry (IHC). The investigated cohort shows that pT and pN stage are the only factors independently associated with survival, according to our multivariate analysis (p = 0.037 and p = 0.014). In univariate analysis, risk factors identified in our cohort were also age (p = 0.015), (lympho-) vascular invasion (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003) and risk stratification (p = 0.037). The p53 protein investigated by three antibodies showed no statistically significant association with survival or other tumor characteristics in the investigated cohort. According to MMR-P IHC, six cases of SGC showed an aberrant IHC phenotype. Additional IdyllaTM MSI test and fragment length analysis failed to confirm microsatellite instability. The pT and pN stage are the most important factors for survival in our cohort. In our cohort, antibodies directed against the protein p53 did not contribute to clinical decision-making and were not correlated with any known clinical characteristics. MSI appears to be insignificant in SGCs. Larger cohorts are needed for verification.

High Probability of Lynch Syndrome Among Colorectal Cancer Patients Is Associated With Higher Occurrence of KRAS and PIK3CA Mutations

Background

In Indonesia, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) rates are higher in patients < 50 years old compared to Western populations, possibly due to a higher frequency of Lynch syndrome (LS) in CRC patients. We aimed to examine the association of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations with LS.

Methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional single-center study, the PCR-HRM-based test was used for screening of microsatellite instability (MSI) mononucleotide markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), MLH1 promoter methylation, and oncogene mutations of BRAF (V600E), KRAS (exon 2 and 3), and PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20) in FFPE DNA samples.

Results

All the samples (n = 244) were from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were found in 151/244 (61.88%) and 107/244 (43.85%) of samples, respectively. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with MSI status in 32/42 (76.19%) and 25/42 (59.52%) of samples, respectively. KRAS mutation was significantly associated with LS status in 26/32 (81.25%) of samples. The PIK3CA mutation was present in a higher proportion in LS samples of 19/32 (59.38%), but not statistically significant. Clinicopathology showed that KRAS mutation was significantly associated with right-sided CRC and higher histology grade in 39/151 (25.83%) and 24/151 (16.44%) samples, respectively. PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with female sex and lower levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in 62/107 (57.94%) and 26/107 (30.23%) samples, respectively. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations did not significantly affect overall survival (120 months) in LS and non-LS patients.

Conclusions

The high probability of LS in Indonesian CRC patients is associated with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations.

Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Targeted Therapies

Precision medicine is transforming colorectal cancer treatment through the integration of advanced technologies and biomarkers, enhancing personalized and effective disease management. Identification of key driver mutations and molecular profiling have deepened our comprehension of the genetic alterations in colorectal cancer, facilitating targeted therapy and immunotherapy selection. Biomarkers such as microsatellite instability (MSI) and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) guide treatment decisions, opening avenues for immunotherapy. Emerging technologies such as liquid biopsies, artificial intelligence, and machine learning promise to revolutionize early detection, monitoring, and treatment selection in precision medicine. Despite these advancements, ethical and regulatory challenges, including equitable access and data privacy, emphasize the importance of responsible implementation. The dynamic nature of colorectal cancer, with its tumor heterogeneity and clonal evolution, underscores the necessity for adaptive and personalized treatment strategies. The future of precision medicine in colorectal cancer lies in its potential to enhance patient care, clinical outcomes, and our understanding of this intricate disease, marked by ongoing evolution in the field. The current reviews focus on providing in-depth knowledge on the various and diverse approaches utilized for precision medicine against colorectal cancer, at both molecular and biochemical levels.

Testing region selection and prognostic analysis of MLH1 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer in China

Background

MLH1 promoter methylation analysis is recommended in screening for Lynch syndrome (LS) in patients with MLH1-deficient colorectal cancer (CRC). The study aims to identify specific methylation regions in the MLH1 promoter and to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of and prognosis for patients with MLH1 methylation.

Methods

A total of 580 CRC cases were included. The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression was assessed by using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The methylation status of the Regions A, B, C, D, and E in the MLH1 promoter was tested by using bisulfite sequencing PCR. The specificities of the five regions were calculated. Associations between MLH1 methylation and clinicopathologic characteristics were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier analyses for overall survival (OS) were carried out.

Results

In 580 CRC cases, the specificities of the methylation test in Regions D and E were both 97.8%. In the MLH1-deficient CRCs, the frequencies of MLH1 methylation and BRAFV600E mutation were 52.6% and 14.6%, respectively; BRAFV600E mutation occurred in 27.7% of patients with MLH1-methylated CRC. In the MMR-deficient patients, compared with MLH1 unmethylation, MLH1 methylation was more common in patients who were aged ≥50 years, female, had no family history of LS-related tumors, and had tumors located at the right colon. In the MMR-deficient patients, the MLH1-methylated cases had lower OS rates than the unmethylated cases with a family history of LS-related tumors (P = 0.047).

Conclusions

Regions D and E in the MLH1 promoter are recommended for determining the MLH1 methylation status in screening for LS in MLH1-deficient CRC. In MMR-deficient patients, the MLH1-methylated cases had a worse OS than the unmethylated cases with a family history of LS-related cancer.

Pathological Features of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Patients Related to MLH1

Background

MLH1, one of the MMR proteins, is linked to DNA replication, its role being to repair the incorrect DNA sequences and to replace them with proper ones. The loss of the MLH1 gene expression is part of Lynch syndrome which can lead to a series of cancers like colorectal and endometrial ones. The aim of this paper is to correlate the levels of MLH1 in four different bio-logical fluids with clinicopathological features in colorectal cancer patients in order to predict them with high probability. Therefore, a mathematical model with given code in Matlab has been proposed to get the clinicopathological features with high probability by only introducing the values for MLH1 concentrations. All these data can be obtained in a very short time even before surgery which can be very helpful the surgeon and the oncologist.

Methods

Four types of samples (whole blood, saliva, urine and tissue) were analyzed using stochastic microsensors; concentrations of MLH1 were determined and compared with different macroscopic and micro-scopic pathological features to obtain mathematical models for early, non-invasive diagnostic of colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Results

There have been established criteria and mathematical models for tumor location, TNM grading system, depth of the tumor, lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasions and the presence of mucus in the tumoral mass.

Conclusions

By using whole blood, saliva and urine samples, the location can be approximated. The proposed mathematical models aimed to allow a minim/noninvasive characterization of the tumor and its location which can help the surgeon and the oncologist to choose faster the personalized treatment.

Colorectal Cancer Stem Cell Biomarkers: Biological Traits and Prognostic Insights

Due to self-renewal, differentiation, and limitless proliferation properties, Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) increase the probability of tumor development. These cells are identified by using CSC markers, which are highly expressed proteins on the cell surface of CSCs. Recently, the therapeutic application of CSCs as novel biomarkers improved both the prognosis and diagnosis outcome of colorectal Cancer. In the present review, we focused on a specific panel of colorectal CSC markers, including LGR5, ALDH, CD166, CD133, and CD44, which offers a targeted and comprehensive analysis of their functions. The selection criteria for these markers cancer were based on their established significance in Colorectal Cancer (CRC) pathogenesis and clinical outcomes, providing novel insights into the CSC biology of CRC. Through this approach, we aim to elevate understanding and stimulate further research for developing effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in CRC.

A New Medium (HistoCold) for Surgical Specimens Preserving to Improve the Preanalytic Issues in Histopathological Samples Handling: Morphologic and Antigenic Analysis

Introduction: The onset of precision medicine has led to the integration of traditional morphologic tissues evaluation with biochemical and molecular data for a more appropriate pathological diagnosis. The preanalytic phase and, particularly, timing of cold ischemia are crucial to guarantee high-quality biorepositories of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues for patients' needs and scientific research. However, delayed fixation using the gold-standard and carcinogenic fixative neutral-buffered formalin (NBF) can be a significant limitation to diagnosis and biopathological characterization. HistoCold (patented; Bio-Optica Milano S.p.A., Milano, Italy) is a nontoxic, stable, and refrigerated preservative solution for tissue handling. This study examined HistoCold's potential role in improving the preanalytic phase of the pathological diagnostic process. Materials and Methods: Breast, lung, or colorectal cancers (20, 25, and 10 cases, respectively) that were to be surgically resected were recruited between 2019 and 2021. Once specimens were surgically removed, three residual samples for each patient were first promptly immersed into HistoCold for 24, 48, and 72 hours and then FFPE. These were compared with routine specimens regarding morphologic features (hematoxylin and eosin) and tissue antigenicity (immunohistochemical stains). Results: Good concordance regarding both the morphologic characteristics of the neoplasms and their proteins expression between the routine and HistoCold handled tissues were found. The tissue handling with the solution never affected the histopathological diagnosis. Conclusions: The use of HistoCold for samples transporting is easy, allows for improving the management of cold ischemia time, and monitoring the fixation times in NBF, resulting in good quality tissue blocks for biobanking. Moreover, it could be a candidate to eliminate formalin from operating theaters. HistoCold looks very promising for the preanalytic phase of human tissues handling in the era of precision medicine, to provide the best service to patients, and to scientific research.

Impact of formalin fixation on mismatch repair protein evaluation by immunohistochemistry

Mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (MMR/MSI) status in colorectal cancer (CRC) has become fundamental as a diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive factor. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) is considered a simple and reliable approach; however, its effectiveness depends on pre-analytic factors. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of different fixation times/protocols on MMR protein IHC quality. Left over tissue from surgically resected CRC samples (cold ischemia time < 30 min) where fixed as follows: standard formalin fixation (24-48 h); hypo-fixation (<20 h); hyper-fixation (>90 h); cold (4°C) fixation (24-48 h); standard fixation for small sample size (0.5×0.5 cm). Samples for each group were collected from 30 resected CRC and the following parameters were evaluated on 600 immunohistochemical stains: intensity of expression; patchiness of staining; presence of central artefact. Forty-six immunoreactions were inadequate (score 0 intensity), the majority regarding MLH1 or PMS2 in the hypo-fixation group (47.8%), followed by the hyper-fixation group (28.1%); cold formalin fixation showed the least inadequate cases. Patchiness and central artefact were more frequent in hypo-fixation and standard fixation group compared to the others. MLH1 (closely followed by PMS2) performed worse with regard to immunostaining intensity (p=0.0002) in the standard and in the hypo-fixation group (p< 0.00001). Using a small sample size improved patchiness/central artefacts. This is the first study specifically created to evaluate the impact of fixation on MMR protein IHC, showing that both formalin hypo- and hyper-fixation can cause problems; 24-h formalin fixation as well as cold (4°C) formalin fixation are recommended for successful IHC MMR evaluation.

DNA Damage Repair Pathways in Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Emerging Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Precision Oncology

Prostate cancer (PCa) has a distinct molecular signature, including characteristic chromosomal translocations, gene deletions and defective DNA damage repair mechanisms. One crucial pathway involved is homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) and it is found in almost 20% of metastatic castrate-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Inherited/germline mutations are associated with a hereditary predisposition to early PCa development and aggressive behavior. BRCA2, ATM and CHECK2 are the most frequently HRD-mutated genes. BRCA2-mutated tumors have unfavorable clinical and pathological characteristics, such as intraductal carcinoma. PARP inhibitors, due to the induction of synthetic lethality, have been therapeutically approved for mCRPC with HRD alterations. Mutations are detected in metastatic tissue, while a liquid biopsy is utilized during follow-up, recognizing acquired resistance mechanisms. The mismatch repair (MMR) pathway is another DNA repair mechanism implicated in carcinogenesis, although only 5% of metastatic PCa is affected. It is associated with aggressive disease. PD-1 inhibitors have been used in MMR-deficient tumors; thus, the MMR status should be tested in all metastatic PCa cases. A surrogate marker of defective DNA repair mechanisms is the tumor mutational burden. PDL-1 expression and intratumoral lymphocytes have ambivalent predictive value. Few experimental molecules have been so far proposed as potential biomarkers. Future research may further elucidate the role of DNA damage pathways in PCa, revealing new therapeutic targets and predictive biomarkers.

Mismatch Repair Protein Status of Non-Neoplastic Uterine and Intestinal Mucosa in Patients with Lynch Syndrome and Double Somatic Mismatch Repair Protein Mutations

Mismatch repair protein-deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts and endometrial glands (dMMR crypts and glands) have been reported as a unique marker of underlying Lynch syndrome (LS). However, no large studies have directly compared the frequency of detection in cases with double somatic (DS) MMR mutations. We retrospectively analyzed 42 colonic resection specimens (24 LS, 18 DS) and 20 endometrial specimens (9 LS, 11 DS) including 19 hysterectomies and 1 biopsy for dMMR crypts and glands. All specimens were from patients with known primary cancers including colonic adenocarcinomas and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (including two mixed carcinomas). Four blocks of normal mucosa away from tumor were selected from most cases, as available. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) specific to the primary tumor mutations were analyzed. dMMR crypts were found in 65% of LS and 0% of DS MMR mutated colonic adenocarcinomas (p < 0.001). Most dMMR crypts were detected in the colon (12 of 15) compared to ileum (3). dMMR crypts showed single and grouped loss of MMR IHC expression. dMMR glands were found in 67% of LS and 9% (1 of 11) of DS endometrial cases (p = 0.017). Most dMMR glands were found in the uterine wall, with 1 LS and 1 DS case exhibiting dMMR glands in the lower uterine segment. The majority of cases exhibited multifocal and grouped dMMR glands. No morphologic atypia was identified in dMMR crypts or glands. Overall, we demonstrate that dMMR crypts and glands are highly associated with underlying LS, while rarer in those with DS MMR mutations.

Histopathological Predictors of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer-a Tertiary Care Center Experience

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has a therapeutic and prognostic implication in colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). It can be detected either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular studies. In developing countries, a significant proportion of the patients experience financial constraints limiting the utilization of healthcare facilities. We aimed to identify the possible clinicopathological variables which can be used as predictors of microsatellite instability in such patients. CRC cases received for MSI detection by IHC (for 1 and 1/2 years) were included. A panel of four IHC markers (anti-MLH1, anti-PMS2, anti-MSH2, and anti-MSH6) was used. Confirmation by the molecular study was recommended in all the IHC-proven MSI cases. Various clinicopathological parameters were evaluated as predictors of MSI. Microsatellite instability was detected in 40.6% (30/74) cases with MLH1 and PMS2 dual loss in 27% cases, MSH2 and MSH6 dual loss in 6.8%, loss of all four MMR proteins in 2.7%, and isolated PMS2 loss in 4.1%. MSI-H expression was shown by 36.5% cases with only 4.1% cases showing MSI-L expression. The age cut-off value to differentiate both the study groups (MSI vs MSS) was 63 years with a sensitivity of 47.7% and specificity of 86.7%. ROC curve showed an area under the curve of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.515-0.776; p-value = 0.03). On univariate analysis, age < 63 years, colon site, and absence of nodal metastasis were significantly higher in the MSI group. However, on multivariate analysis, only the age < 63 years was found to be significantly higher in the MSI group. Confirmation was molecular study could only be obtained in 12 cases and was completely concordant with MSI detection by IHC. MSI detection can be performed either by IHC or by molecular study. In this study, no histological parameter appeared to be the independent predictor of MSI status. The age < 63 years might predict the microsatellite instability, yet larger studies are needed for its validation. Thus, we recommend that IHC testing should be performed in all CRC cases.

Tumors of the Digestive System: Comprehensive Review of Ancillary Testing and Biomarkers in the Era of Precision Medicine

Immunotherapy has remained at the vanguard of promising cancer therapeutic regimens due to its exceptionally high specificity for tumor cells and potential for significantly improved treatment-associated quality of life compared to other therapeutic approaches such as surgery and chemoradiation. This is especially true in the digestive system, where high rates of mutation give rise to a host of targetable tumor-specific antigens. Many patients, however, do not exhibit measurable improvements under immunotherapy due to intrinsic or acquired resistance, making predictive biomarkers necessary to determine which patients will benefit from this line of treatment. Many of these biomarkers are assessed empirically by pathologists according to nuanced scoring criteria and algorithms. This review serves to inform clinicians and pathologists of extant and promising upcoming biomarkers predictive of immunotherapeutic efficacy among digestive system malignancies and the ancillary testing required for interpretation by pathologists according to tumor site of origin.

Spatially Resolved Single-Cell Assessment of Pancreatic Cancer Expression Subtypes Reveals Co-expressor Phenotypes and Extensive Intratumoral Heterogeneity

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been classified into classical and basal-like transcriptional subtypes by bulk RNA measurements. However, recent work has uncovered greater complexity to transcriptional subtypes than was initially appreciated using bulk RNA expression profiling. To provide a deeper understanding of PDAC subtypes, we developed a multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) pipeline that quantifies protein expression of six PDAC subtype markers (CLDN18.2, TFF1, GATA6, KRT17, KRT5, and S100A2) and permits spatially resolved, single-cell interrogation of pancreatic tumors from resection specimens and core needle biopsies. Both primary and metastatic tumors displayed striking intratumoral subtype heterogeneity that was associated with patient outcomes, existed at the scale of individual glands, and was significantly reduced in patient-derived organoid cultures. Tumor cells co-expressing classical and basal markers were present in > 90% of tumors, existed on a basal-classical polarization continuum, and were enriched in tumors containing a greater admixture of basal and classical cell populations. Cell-cell neighbor analyses within tumor glands further suggested that co-expressor cells may represent an intermediate state between expression subtype poles. The extensive intratumoral heterogeneity identified through this clinically applicable mIF pipeline may inform prognosis and treatment selection for patients with PDAC.

SIGNIFICANCE

A high-throughput pipeline using multiplex immunofluorescence in pancreatic cancer reveals striking expression subtype intratumoral heterogeneity with implications for therapy selection and identifies co-expressor cells that may serve as intermediates during subtype switching.

Scoring Systems for Immunohistochemistry in Urothelial Carcinoma

Immunohistochemistry is widely used in diagnostic and scientific analysis of urothelial carcinoma. Objective interpretation of staining results is mandatory for accuracy and comparability in diagnostic and therapeutic patient care as well as research.Herein we summarize and explain standardized microscopic evaluation and scoring approaches for immunohistochemical stainings. We focus on commonly used and generally feasible approaches for different cellular compartments and comment on their utility in diagnostics and research practice.

WRN Is a Promising Synthetic Lethal Target for Cancers with Microsatellite Instability (MSI)

Microsatellite instability (MSI), a type of genetic hypermutability arising from impaired DNA mismatch repair (MMR), is observed in approximately 3% of all cancers. Preclinical work has identified the RecQ helicase WRN as a promising synthetic lethal target for patients with MSI cancers. WRN depletion substantially impairs the viability of MSI, but not microsatellite stable (MSS), cells. Experimental evidence suggests that this synthetic lethal phenotype is driven by numerous TA dinucleotide repeats that undergo expansion mutations in the setting of long-standing MMR deficiency. The lengthening of TA repeats increases their propensity to form secondary DNA structures that require WRN to resolve. In the absence of WRN helicase activity, these unresolved DNA secondary structures stall DNA replication forks and induce catastrophic DNA damage.

Universal tumor screening for lynch syndrome on colorectal cancer biopsies impacts surgical treatment decisions

Universal tumor screening (UTS) for Lynch syndrome (LS) on colorectal cancer (CRC) can be performed on biopsies or resection specimens. The advantage of biopsies is the chance to provide preoperative genetic counseling/testing (GC/T) so patients diagnosed with LS can make informed decisions regarding resection extent. We evaluated utilization of UTS on biopsies, percentage of patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) who underwent GC/T preoperatively, and whether surgical/treatment decisions were impacted. We performed a retrospective review of medical records to assess CRC cases with dMMR immunohistochemical staining from 1/1/2017 to 2/26/2021. 1144 CRC patients had UTS using MMR immunohistochemistry; 559 biopsies (48.9%) and 585 resections (51.1%). The main reason UTS was not performed on biopsy was it occurred outside our health system. 58 (5%) of CRCs were dMMR and did not have MLH1 promoter hypermethylation (if MLH1 and PMS2 absent). 28/58 (48.3%) of dMMR cases were diagnosed on biopsy. Of those 28, 14 (50%) eventually underwent GC/T, and 7 (25%) had GT results prior to surgery. One of the 7 had incomplete documentation of results affecting their treatment plan. Of the remaining 6 with complete documentation, 5 underwent surgery and one was treated with immunotherapy only. Three patients elected a more extensive surgery. 6/28 (21.4%) dMMR patients identified on biopsy made an informed surgical/treatment decision based on their dMMR status/LS diagnosis. When applied, UTS on biopsy followed by genetic counseling and testing informs surgical decision-making. Process and implementation strategies are in place to overcome challenges to more broadly optimize this approach.

Role of PD-1/PD-L1-mediated tumour immune escape mechanism and microsatellite instability in the BCG failure of high-grade urothelial carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Intravesical BCG treatment fails inexplicably in 30%-45% of patients for high-grade nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We aimed to investigate the role of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction on BCG failure of high-grade NMIBC and to identify biomarkers for predicting BCG responsive cases.

METHODS

Thirty BCG responsive and 29 nonresponsive NMIBCs were included in the study. Expressions of PDL1(SP-263), MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and MLH1 were evaluated on pre- and post-BCG transurethral resection (TUR-B) specimens by immunohistochemistry. PD-L1(SP-263) expression was categorised as negative/low, high. DNA mismatch repair protein (MMR) expressions were classified as "reduced" if ≤30% of nuclei stained, "preserved" if >30% of nuclei stained. Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was performed by PCR using five mononucleotide markers.

RESULTS

Reduced DNA MMR protein expression was found to be significantly higher in the pretreatment biopsies of BCG-responsive group than the BCG nonresponsive tumour group (p = 0.022). PD-L1 expression did not show any significant difference between the pre- and posttreatment TUR-B specimens of the BCG nonresponsive tumour group or between the pretreatment TUR-B specimens of BCG nonresponsive and the BCG responsive groups (p = 0.508, p = 0.708, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Immune escape of tumour cells by PD-1/PD-L1 interaction does not seem to have any role in BCG failure of NMIBCs. Reduced MMR expression may help to determine cases that will respond well to BCG therapy. A better antitumour activity of BCG in NMIBCs with reduced MMR expression may be related to the ongoing accumulation of cancer neoantigens in correlation with increased tumour mutation load as a result of DNA repair defects.

Concurrent loss of MLH1, PMS2 and MSH6 immunoexpression in digestive system cancers indicating a widespread dysregulation in DNA repair processes

Immunohistochemical analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression is widely used to identify tumors with a deficient MMR (dMMR). MMR proteins (MLH1/PMS2 and MSH2/MSH6) work as functional heterodimers, which usually leads to the loss of expression in only one functional MMR heterodimer. Recently, there have been studies showing the simultaneous loss of immunoexpression in proteins of both heterodimers. Yet, this phenomenon has been rarely investigated. In this study, we retrospectively considered cases of different digestive system cancers (gastric cancer, ampullary cancer, small bowel cancer, colorectal cancer), which were immunohistochemically tested for dMMR within a 4-year period at our university hospital (n=352). Of the 103 cases showing dMMR, 5 cases (1.4% of all, 5.1% of dMMR cases) showed a concurrent loss of MLH1, PMS2 and MSH6 immunoexpression, whereas in the other 98 dMMR cases only one MMR heterodimer was affected. MLH1^-/PMS2^-/MSH6^- cancer cases almost arose throughout the entire digestive tract: from the gastric antrum to the left colic flexur. To provide a comprehensive molecular characterization of this MLH1^-/PMS2^-/MSH6^- immunophenotype, tumors were analyzed for microsatellite instability, MLH1 promotor hypermethylation and BRAF exon 15 status. Furthermore, we performed next-generation sequencing focusing on genes related to DNA repair. Here, we could detect pathogenic germline variants as well as multiple sporadic mutations in different genes involved in MMR and homologous recombination repair (HRR) respectively. The affected MMR/HRR-related genes were: ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCA, MLH1, MSH6, PALB2, TP53. Considering the biologic function of HRR/MMR proteins as potential drug targets and the low frequency of most of these mutations in digestive system cancers in general, their common occurrence in our MLH1^-/PMS2^-/MSH6^- cases seems to be even more noteworthy, highlighting the need for recognition, awareness and further investigation of this unusual IHC staining pattern.

Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive malignant tumor of the central nervous system with a low survival rate. The difficulty of obtaining this tumor material represents a major limitation, making the real-time monitoring of tumor progression difficult, especially in the events of recurrence or resistance to treatment. The identification of characteristic biomarkers is indispensable for an accurate diagnosis, the rigorous follow-up of patients, and the development of new personalized treatments. Liquid biopsy, as a minimally invasive procedure, holds promise in this regard. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the current literature regarding the identification of molecular and circulating glioblastoma biomarkers and the importance of their integration as a valuable tool to improve patient care.

Microsatellite Instable Colorectal Adenocarcinoma Diagnostics: The Advent of Liquid Biopsy Approaches

The introduction of immunotherapy has revolutionized the oncological targeted therapy paradigm. Microsatellite instability (MSI) identifies a subgroup of colorectal cancers (CRCs) which respond to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Tissue biopsy is currently the gold standard for the assessment of MSI/Mismatch Repair deficiency (MMRd) by means immunohistochemistry or molecular assays. However, the application of liquid biopsy in the clinic may help to overcome several limitations of tissue analysis and may provide great benefit to the diagnostic scenario and therapeutic decision-making process. In the context of MSI/MMRd CRC, the use of liquid biopsy may allow to establish MSI/MMR status if tissue sampling cannot be performed or in case of discordant tissue biopsies. Liquid biopsy may also become a powerful tool to monitor treatment response and the onset resistance to immunotherapy over time and to stratify of MSI/MMRd patients according to their risk of relapse and metastases. The aim of this review is to summarize the main technical aspects and clinical applications, the benefits, and limitations of the use of liquid biopsy in MSI/MMRd colorectal cancer patients.

BRAF and MLH1 Analysis Algorithm for the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome Risk in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: Evidence-Based Data from the Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases

Several causes may lead to CRC, either extrinsic (sporadic forms) or genetic (hereditary forms), such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Most sporadic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC cases are characterized by the methylation of the MLH1 promoter gene and/or BRAF gene mutations. Usually, the first test performed is the mismatch repair deficiency analysis. If a tumor shows a dMMR, BRAF mutations and then the MLH1 promoter methylation status have to be assessed, according to the ACG/ASCO screening algorithm. In this study, 100 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of dMMR CRC were analyzed for both BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 47 (47%) samples were BRAF p.V600E mutated, while MLH1 promoter methylation was found in 77 cases (77.0%). The pipeline “BRAF-followed-by-MLH1-analysis” led to a total of 153 tests, while the sequence “MLH1-followed-by-BRAF-analysis” resulted in a total of 123 tests. This study highlights the importance of performing MLH1 analysis in LS screening of BRAF-WT specimens before addressing patients to genetic counseling. We show that MLH1 analysis performs better as a first-line test in the screening of patients with LS risk than first-line BRAF analysis. Our data indicate that analyzing MLH1 methylation as a first-line test is more cost-effective.

Endometrial Cancer: An Update on Prognostic Pathologic Features and Clinically Relevant Biomarkers

The prognosis of endometrial cancers has historically been determined by the evaluation of histologic typing, grading, and staging. Recently, molecular classification, pioneered by the 4 prognostic categories from The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, has been shown to independently predict the outcome, correlate with biomarker expression, and predict response to adjuvant chemotherapy. In modern-day pathology practice, it has become necessary to integrate the time-honored prognostic pathologic features with molecular classification to optimize patient management. In this review, the significance of the molecular classification of endometrioid carcinomas, the application of practical diagnostic surrogate algorithms, and interpretation of test results will be addressed. Histologic features and theragnostic biomarkers will also be discussed in relation to the molecular subtypes of endometrial cancers.

Microsatellite Status Detection in Gastrointestinal Cancers: PCR/NGS Is Mandatory in Negative/Patchy MMR Immunohistochemistry

Simple Summary

Microsatellite instability (MSI) detection has a high impact on eligibility for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancers. The appropriate detection of MSI represents the major critical issue in clinical practice, thus a better understanding of the limits related to MSI testing is needed to avoid misinterpretations. This study addresses the discordance between IHC and PCR/NGS testing in a large retrospective series of colorectal and gastric cancers in order to improve diagnosis. Our findings show a disagreement between negative/patchy expression IHC and PCR/NGS results, suggesting that molecular testing is mandatory in this subset of tumors.

Abstract

Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors. The main goal was to investigate the discordance between IHC and PCR/NGS for MSI testing in gastrointestinal cancers. Methods: Two series were analyzed through IHC for mismatch-repair-system proteins (MMRP) and PCR, with one series of 444 colorectal cancers (CRC) and the other of 176 gastric cancers (GC). All cases with discordant results between IHC and PCR were analyzed by NGS. IHC staining was evaluated as follows: proficient MMR (pMMR), with all MMR positive; deficient MMR (dMMR), with the loss of one heterodimer; and cases with the loss/patchy expression of one MMR (lo-paMMR). Cases with instability in at least two markers by PCR were MSI-high (MSI-H) and with instability in one marker, MSI-low (MSI-L). Cases without instability were evaluated as microsatellite-stable (MSS). Results: In the CRC cohort, 15 out of 444 cases were dMMR and 46 lo-paMMR. Among the 15 dMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 2 MSS. Among the 46 lo-paMMR, 13 were MSI-H and 33 were MSS. In the GC cohort, 13 out of 176 cases were dMMR and 6 cases lo-paMMR. Among the 13 dMMR, 12 were MSI-H and only 1 was MSS. All six lo-paMMR cases were MSS. All NGS results were in agreement with PCR. Conclusions: In clinical practice, MMR–IHC could be used as a screening test and additional molecular analysis is mandatory exclusively in cases carrying loss/patchy MMR-IHC.

Molecular mechanisms and differences in lynch syndrome developing into colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer based on gene expression, methylation, and mutation analysis

Purpose

The aim of this study was to screen biomarkers specific to Lynch syndrome (LS) with colorectal cancer (CRC) or endometrial cancer (EC) to explore the mechanisms by which LS develops into CRC and EC and their differences.

Methods

Differentially expressed or differentially methylated genes and differential mutations were identified in 10 LS, 50 CRC, and 50 EC patients from TCGA, and genes overlapping between LS and CRC or EC (named SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs, respectively) were identified. Afterward, we annotated the enriched GO terms and pathways and constructed a protein–protein interaction (PPI) network. Finally, samples from 10 clinical cases with MSI-H/MSS CRC and EC were collected to verify the mutations and their correlations with five LS pathogenic genes in the SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs.

Results

A total of 494 SGs-LCs and 104 SGs-LEs were identified and enriched in 106 and 14 GO terms, respectively. There were great differences in the gene count and enriched terms between SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs. In the PPI network, SST, GCG, SNAP25, and NPY had the highest degree of connection among the SGs-LCs, and KIF20A and NUF2 had the highest degree of connection among the SGs-LE. In the SGs-LCs and SGs-LEs, the genes whose expression levels affected the survival of LS, CRC or EC patients were quite different.

Conclusions

COL11A1 was found to be mutated in MSS CRC patients, similar to the mutations of MSH6. SST, GCG, SNAP25, and NPY may be biomarkers for the development of LS into CRC, and KIF20A and NUF2 may be markers of LS developing into EC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10552-021-01543-w.

Sporadic and Lynch syndrome-associated mismatch repair-deficient brain tumors

Mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD) brain tumors are rare among primary brain tumors and can be induced by germline or sporadic mutations. Here, we report 13 MMRD-associated (9 sporadic and 4 Lynch syndrome) primary brain tumors to determine clinicopathological and molecular characteristics and biological behavior. Our 13 MMRD brain tumors included glioblastoma (GBM) IDH-wildtype (n = 9) including 1 gliosarcoma, astrocytoma IDH-mutant WHO grade 4 (n = 2), diffuse midline glioma (DMG) H3 K27M-mutant (n = 1), and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) (n = 1). Next-generation sequencing using a brain tumor-targeted gene panel, microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, Sanger sequencing for germline MMR gene mutation, immunohistochemistry of MMR proteins, and clinicopathological and survival analysis were performed. There were many accompanying mutations, suggesting a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) in 77%, but TMB was absent in one case of GBM, IDH-wildtype, DMG, and PXA, respectively. MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, and PMS2 mutations were found in 31%, 31%, 31% and 7% of patients, respectively. MSI-high and MSI-low were found in 50% and 8% of these gliomas, respectively and 34% was MSI-stable. All Lynch syndrome-associated GBMs had MSI-high. In addition, 77% (10/13) had histopathologically multinucleated giant cells. The progression-free survival tended to be poorer than the patients with no MMRD gliomas, but the number and follow-up duration of our patients were insufficient to get statistical significance. In the present study, we found that the most common MMRD primary brain tumor was GBM IDH-wildtype. The genetic profile of MMRD GBM was different from that of conventional GBM. MMRD gliomas with TMB and MSI-H may be sensitive to immunotherapy but resistant to temozolomide. Our findings can help develop better treatment options.

Molecular testing for colorectal cancer: Clinical applications

Molecular genetic analysis is an integral part of colorectal cancer (CRC) management. The choice of systemic therapy for CRC is largely based on the results of tumor molecular testing. Evaluation of the KRAS and NRAS gene status is mandatory for consideration of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy. Tumors with the BRAF V600E substitution are characterized by aggressive behaviour, may require intensified cytotoxic regimens and benefit from combined BRAF and EGFR inhibition. The inactivation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR), or MUTYH gene, or DNA polymerase epsilon results in excessive tumor mutational burden; these CRCs are highly antigenic and therefore sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Some CRCs are characterized by overexpression of the HER2 oncogene and respond to the appropriate targeted therapy. There are CRCs with clinical signs of hereditary predisposition to this disease, which require germline genetic testing. Liquid biopsy is an emerging technology that has the potential to assist CRC screening, control the efficacy of surgical intervention and guide disease monitoring. The landscape of CRC molecular diagnosis is currently undergoing profound changes due to the increasing use of next generation sequencing.

MSI testing : What's new? What should be considered?

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Insulinoma-associated Protein 1 (INSM1) Expression in Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Urinary Tract

Clinical guidelines state that neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be administered before surgery in muscle invasive urinary bladder small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Recently described marker insulinoma-associated protein 1 (INSM1) has been reported to be sensitive and specific for neuroendocrine differentiation, however, its efficacy in urinary tract small cell carcinoma is not well established. This study examines immunohistochemical expression of INSM1 on whole tissue sections of urinary tract small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and compares INSM1 expression with established neuroendocrine markers. Immunohistochemical stains for CD56, INSM1, synaptophysin, and chromogranin were performed on 32 cases of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder. Staining was scored for intensity (0: no staining; 1: weak; 2: moderate; 3: strong) and proportion of cells stained (0: 0%; 1: >0% to ≤25%; 2: >25% to ≤50%; 3: >50% to ≤75%; 4: >75% to 100%). INSM1 was positive (intensity 1 to 3 or proportion 1 to 4) in 87% (28/32) of cases (20 with intensity 2 to 3, 17 with proportion 3 to 4). CD56, synaptophysin, and chromogranin were positive in 75% (24/32), 60% (19/32), and 44% (14/32) of cases, respectively. INSM1 was negative (n=4) or only showed weak intensity staining (n=7) in 34% (11/32) of cases. INSM1 is a sensitive marker of small cell neuroendocrine differentiation of the urinary tract. However, this study suggests that optimal utilization of INSM1 would be inclusion in a limited panel of stains rather than as a stand-alone screening marker given that it is negative or only shows weak intensity staining in a significant proportion of cases.

Evaluating mismatch repair deficiency for solid tumor immunotherapy eligibility: immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite molecular testing

While many landmark solid tumor immunotherapy studies show clinical benefits for solid tumors with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), the methodologies focus only on confirmatory polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for MSI-H. Because some tumors are either dMMR or MSI-H but not the other, clinicians must choose between two testing methods for a broad patient population. We investigated the level of correlation between MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite PCR testing results in 62 cancer patients. Thirty-five of the 62 cases (56.5%) were MSI-H by PCR, whereas 35 (56.5%) were dMMR by IHC. MMR IHC results correlated well with MSI PCR in 32 co-positive cases (91.4%) and 24 co-negative cases (88.9%). Six discrepant cases (9.7%) were identified, among which three were MSI-H and MMR intact, and three were dMMR and microsatellite stable. The results of this study highlight the implications of dMMR/MSI testing strategies on precision oncology. Co-testing with both MMR IHC and MSI PCR may be an effective screening strategy for evaluating immunotherapy eligibility status for solid tumors.

[MSI testing : What is new? What should be considered? German version]

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Discordance between immunochemistry of mismatch repair proteins and molecular testing of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer

Background

DNA mismatch repair system deficiency (dMMR) is found in 15% of colorectal cancers (CRCs). Two methods are used to determine dMMR, immunohistochemistry (IHC) of MMR proteins and molecular testing of microsatellite instability (MSI). Only studies with a low number of patients have reported rates of discordance between these two methods, ranging from 1% to 10%.

Materials and methods

Overall, 3228 consecutive patients with CRCs from two centers were included. Molecular testing was carried out using the Pentaplex panel and IHC evaluated four (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2; cohort 1; n = 1085) or two MMR proteins (MLH1 and MSH2; cohort 2; n = 2143). The primary endpoint was the rate of discordance between MSI and MMR IHC tests.

Results

Fifty-one discordant cases (1.6%) were initially observed. Twenty-nine out of 51 discordant cases were related to IHC misclassifications. In cohort 1, after re-reading IHC and/or carrying out new IHC, 16 discordant cases were reclassified as nondiscordant. In cohort 2, after the addition of MSH6/PMS2 IHC and re-examination, 13 were reclassified as nondiscordant. In addition, 10 misclassifications of molecular tests were identified. Finally, only 12 discordant cases (0.4%) remained: 5 were proficient MMR/MSI and 7 were dMMR/microsatellite stable.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the high degree of concordance between MSI and MMR IHC tests. Discordant cases must be reviewed, and if needed, tests must be repeated and analyzed by an expert team.

•

Concordance between MMR IHC (four proteins) and MSI molecular testing (Pentaplex) is superior to 98% in CRC cases

•

Most discordant cases are related to misinterpretation of the tests, which may lead to clinical management errors.

•

Discordant cases must be reviewed and tests must be repeated because most cases will be reclassified as nondiscordant.

The Role of Mismatch Repair in Glioblastoma Multiforme Treatment Response and Resistance

Mismatch repair (MMR) is a highly conserved DNA repair pathway that is critical for the maintenance of genomic integrity. This pathway targets base substitution and insertion-deletion mismatches, which primarily arise from replication errors that escape DNA polymerase proof-reading function. Here, the authors review key concepts in the molecular mechanisms of MMR in response to alkylation damage, approaches to detect MMR status in the clinic, and the clinical relevance of this pathway in glioblastoma multiforme treatment response and resistance.

Mismatch repair phenotype determines the implications of tumor grade and CDX2 expression in stage II-III colon cancer

Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an indicator of good prognosis in localized colon cancer but also associated with lack of expression of caudal-type homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) and high tumor grade; markers that in isolation indicate a poor prognosis. Our study aims to identify clinically relevant prognostic subgroups by combining information about tumor grade, MMR phenotype, and CDX2 expression. Immunohistochemistry for MMR proteins and CDX2 was performed in 544 patients with colon cancer stage II-III, including a cohort from a randomized trial. In patients with proficient MMR (pMMR) and CDX2 negativity, hazard ratio (HR) for cancer death was 2.93 (95% CI 1.23-6.99, p = 0.015). Cancer-specific survival for pMMR/CDX2-negative cases was 35.8 months (95% CI 23.4-48.3) versus 52.1-53.5 months (95% CI 45.6-58.6, p = 0.001) for the remaining cases (CDX2-positive tumors or deficient MMR (dMMR)/CDX2-negative tumors). In our randomized cohort, high tumor grade was predictive of response to adjuvant fluorouracil-levamisole in pMMR patients, with a significant interaction between tumor grade and treatment (p = 0.036). For pMMR patients, high tumor grade was a significant marker of poor prognosis in the surgery-only group (HR 4.60 (95% CI 1.68-12.61), p = 0.003) but not in the group receiving chemotherapy (HR 0.66 (95% CI 0.15-3.00), p = 0.587). To conclude, patients with pMMR and CDX2 negativity have a very poor prognosis. Patients with pMMR and high-graded tumors have a poor prognosis but respond well to adjuvant chemotherapy. CDX2 expression and tumor grade did not impact prognosis in patients with dMMR.

Mismatch Repair System Genomic Scars in Gastroesophageal Cancers: Biology and Clinical Testing

Alterations in the mismatch repair (MMR) system result in genomic instability, neoantigen production, and immune response in cancer. There is evidence that gastroesophageal tumors with MMR deficiency may be susceptible to immune-checkpoint inhibitors treatment, especially in those presenting at advanced-stage disease. Although a number of biomarkers have been developed in histology-agnostic settings to assess MMR status, there is evidence that a tumor-specific testing approach would improve the selection of patients for immunotherapy. However, no testing methods have been developed specifically for gastroesophageal cancers so far. Here, we discuss the state of the art, current advances, and future perspectives of MMR-related biomarkers’ biologic and clinical role in gastroesophageal cancers.

Identification and clinical validation of metastasis-associated biomarkers based on large-scale samples in colon-adenocarcinoma

AIM

Distant metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colon-adenocarcinoma(COAD). Due to the lack of effective molecular markers and treatment, the prognosis of patients with metastatic colon cancer is still rather poor.

METHODS

Metastatic related signature (MRS) of stage I and stage IV in colon cancer were identified from different cohorts. Univariate cox regression is used to analyze the relationship between MRS and the overall survival. L1000FWD and DGIdb databases are used to identify molecular drugs. Expression and functional experimental validation of the hub MRS were carried out.

RESULTS

16 MRS were identified, of which 14 MRS was significantly correlated with overall survival. Further functional enrichment analysis showed that MRS was significantly involved with important biological functions such as cell migration, and apoptosis. As important metastatic related genes, GSR, FAS and CYP1B1 have significant interaction with drug molecules. Further studies have confirmed that the expression of FAS and GSR is low, and inhibition of its expression can promote the metastasis of COAD. CYP1B1 expression is highly expressed, and inhibition of its expression can attenuate the malignant biological behavior of colon cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our research could increase the understanding of the mechanism of colon cancer metastasis and provide theoretical basis for the treatment of metastatic colon cancer.

Unexpected expression of mismatch repair protein is more commonly seen with pathogenic missense than with other mutations in Lynch syndrome

It has been observed that some patients with colorectal cancer due to germline or double somatic pathogenic variants in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes may have intact protein expression in their tumors as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This has been speculated to occur more frequently in Lynch syndrome (LS) cases due to pathogenic missense mutations, leading to expression of a full-length but nonfunctional protein with retained antigenicity. Our goals were to study the frequency of unexpected MMR expression in colorectal cancers among LS cases with missense mutations, LS cases with truncating mutations, as well as cases with double somatic MMR mutations and evaluate if the unexpected MMR expression is more common in certain categories. IHC slides were available for 82 patients with MMR deficiency without methylation, which included 56 LS cases and 26 double somatic MMR mutation cases. Sixteen of 82 MMR-defective cases showed unexpected MMR expression, with 10 cases showing tumor staining weaker than the control and 6 cases (7%) showing intact staining. Unexpected MMR expression was most commonly seen with LS cases with missense mutations (4 of 9, 44%), followed by MMR double somatic mutation cases (7 of 26, 27%), and finally by LS cases with truncating mutations (5 of 47, 11%). Cautious interpretation of MMR IHC is advised when dealing with tumor staining that is weaker than the control regardless of the percentage of tumor staining as these cases may harbor pathogenic MMR gene mutations. Missense mutations may account for some LS cases that may be missed by IHC alone. Strict adherence to proper interpretation of IHC with attention to staining intensity and the status of heterodimer partner protein will prevent many potential misses.

The utility of immunohistochemical testing for mismatch repair proteins in fine needle aspiration specimens of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing is recommended for all colonic and endometrial carcinomas to screen for Lynch syndrome. The role of MSI testing in pancreatic adenocarcinoma has not been well-established. Screening can be done via immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). We report our experience and the clinical utility of MMR IHC on pancreatic adenocarcinomas in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review to identify all patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma by FNA at our institution between December 2017 and September 2019. For cases with sufficient tumor cells for testing, the MMR results and morphology were summarized, as well as corresponding clinical information, including age, clinical stage, treatment, and concurrent other cancers.

RESULTS

From December 2017 to September 2019, there were a total of 184 pancreatic FNAs with a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Of these 184 FNAs, 65 (35%) contained sufficient material in the cell block to perform IHC for MMR. The cell block material was collected in either RPMI or CytoLyt. Poor technical quality precluded interpretation of PMS2 in 4 cases and MSH6 in 2 cases. All other cases showed intact expression of all four proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

IHC for MMR proteins can be done on specimens collected in RPMI or CytoLyt, but RPMI appears to be more reliable. None of the pancreatic adenocarcinomas in this study showed loss of MMR protein expression. Routine testing of MMR loss may not be indicated in pancreatic adenocarcinomas in the general patient population.

Modeling the effect of prolonged ethanol exposure on global gene expression and chromatin accessibility in normal 3D colon organoids

In this study we aimed to explore the potential biological effect of ethanol exposure on healthy colon epithelial cells using normal human colon 3D organoid “mini-gut” cultures. In numerous published studies ethanol use has been shown to be an environmental risk factor for colorectal cancer (CRC) development; however, the influence of ethanol exposure on normal colon epithelial cell biology remains poorly understood. We investigated the potential molecular effects of ethanol exposure in normal colon 3D organoids in a small pilot study (n = 3) using RNA-seq and ATAC-seq. We identify 1965 differentially expressed genes and 2217 differentially accessible regions of chromatin in response to ethanol treatment. Further, by cross-referencing our results with previously published analysis in colorectal cancer cell lines, we have not only validated a number of reported differentially expressed genes, but also identified several novel candidates for future investigation. In summary, our data highlights the potential importance for the use of normal colon 3D organoid models as a novel tool for the investigation of the relationship between the effects of environmental risk factors associated with colorectal cancer and the molecular mechanisms through which they confer this risk.