Prognostic model for patient survival in primary anorectal mucosal melanoma: stage at presentation determines relevance of histopathologic features

Real-World Evidence of the Prevalence of Driver Mutations in Anorectal Melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with an aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Recently, recurrent gene mutations related to anorectal melanoma have been identified in a small series of cases, and this holds promise for targeted therapies, analogous to cutaneous melanoma. The purpose of this study was to analyze testing rates and prevalence of mutations in anorectal melanoma in the Dutch population.

METHODS

The Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank were queried for all patients with a diagnosis of anorectal melanoma (2009-2019) and for whom a molecular analysis was performed. The genes that were tested and mutations that were reported were recorded. Mutation status was correlated with clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In the period 2009-2019, 121 patients were diagnosed with anorectal melanoma. A molecular analysis was performed for 81 (67%) using single gene testing and various next-generation sequencing panels. Testing rates increased from 53% in 2009-2012 to 73% in 2016-2019. In 29/81 (36%) analyzed tumors, one or more mutations were reported: mutations in KIT (16/70, 23%), CTNNB1 (3/20, 15%), NRAS (6/60, 10%), BRAF non-V600E (4/74, 5%), GNAS (1/19, 5%), KRAS (1/28, 4%), BRAF V600E (1/74, 1%), and SF3B1 (1/1). In this cohort, a positive correlation was found between BRAF mutation status and age. Mutation status did not correlate with sex, date of diagnosis, tumor stage or surgical treatment. Survival was not influenced by any mutation status.

CONCLUSION

KIT was the most frequently mutated gene in the 81 analyzed anorectal melanomas in the period 2009-2019. With the increasing testing rates and use of next generation sequencing, the molecular landscape of anorectal melanomas is gradually being revealed. Adoption of broad mutation analysis will reveal potentially actionable targets for treatment of patients with anorectal melanoma.

Mucosal melanoma: Review from a pathologist point of view

Mucosal melanomas (MuM) are rare malignant tumors arising from the epithelia lining the inner mucosal surfaces of the body. Unlike cutaneous melanoma, understanding of MuM is limited among pathologists and clinicians alike, primarily due to rarity of these tumors. MuM are characterized by genetic alterations quite distinct from cutaneous melanomas; however, their causative and promoting factors are unknown. These melanomas are characteristically diagnosed at a later stage due to their occult locations, leading to a worse prognosis. Dedicated staging systems for MuM exist only for sinonasal and conjunctival melanomas. Risk stratification of patients with MuM, particularly those arising from the anogenital area, is challenging. Recent studies have shown that minor modifications of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cutaneous melanoma staging system can group patients fairly robustly; however, the proposed T-categorization systems have yet to be validated in larger cohorts. We summarize the demographic, clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features of common subtypes of MuM and highlight the outstanding needs in this field.

[Anorectal melanoma : Update on clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment]

Anorectal melanomas are a rare malignant type of cancer and pose a diagnostic challenge due to their hidden anatomical location. They are associated with nonspecific clinical symptoms and are therefore often misinterpreted as benign disease. The result is delayed diagnosis in the locally advanced or metastasized stage and an unfavorable prognosis. Given the overall low incidence of the tumor, no consensus guidelines for diagnosis or therapy are established either internationally or nationally at present. The present work intends to provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical aspects, diagnostics, and therapeutic approaches of anorectal melanoma based on the currently available literature.

Proceedings from the Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA)

Mucosal melanoma remains a rare cancer with high mortality and a paucity of therapeutic options. This is due in significant part to its low incidence leading to limited patient access to expert care and downstream clinical/basic science data for research interrogation. Clinical challenges such as delayed and at times inaccurate diagnoses, and lack of consensus tumor staging have added to the suboptimal outcomes for these patients. Clinical trials, while promising, have been difficult to activate and accrue. While individual institutions and investigators have attempted to seek solutions to such problems, international, national, and local partnership may provide the keys to more efficient and innovative paths forward. Furthermore, a mucosal melanoma coalition would provide a potential network for patients and caregivers to seek expert opinion and advice. The Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA) highlighted the current clinical challenges faced by patients, providers, and scientists, identified current and future clinical trial investigations in this rare disease space, and aimed to increase national and international collaboration among the mucosal melanoma community in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The included proceedings highlight the clinical challenges of mucosal melanoma, global clinical trial experience, basic science advances in mucosal melanoma, and future directions, including the creation of shared rare tumor registries and enhanced collaborations.

Prognostic models based on lymph node density for primary gastrointestinal melanoma: a SEER population-based analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to construct prognostic models to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma (PGIM).

DESIGN

An observational and retrospective study.

SETTING

Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) programme database, encompassing a broad geographical and demographic spectrum of patients across the USA.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 991 patients diagnosed with PGIM were included in this study.

METHODS

A total of 991 patients with PGIM were selected from the SEER database. They were further divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. Independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. Two prognostic models were constructed based on the results of multivariable Cox regression analysis. The concordance index (C-index) and area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (time-dependent AUC) were used to evaluate the discriminative ability. Calibration curves were plotted to evaluate the agreement between the probability as predicted by the models and the actual probability. Risk stratification was developed given the model.

RESULTS

By the multivariable Cox regression analysis, we identified four independent risk factors (age, stage, lymph node density and surgery) for OS, and three independent risk factors (stage, lymph node density and surgery) for CSS, which were used to construct prognostic models. C-index, time-dependent AUC, calibration curves and Kaplan-Meier curves of risk stratification indicated that these two models had good discriminative ability, predictive ability as well as clinical value.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic models of OS and CSS had satisfactory accuracy and were of clinical value in evaluating the prognosis of patients with PGIM.

Management of primary anorectal mucosal melanoma during the COVID-19 pandemic

Anorectal melanoma is a rare and difficult-to-diagnose highly malignant cancer with a poor prognosis. The treatment usually involves surgery and often includes adjuvants such as radiation therapy and immunotherapy. We present a case of a 77-year-old Peruvian who was eventually diagnosed with this cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic, which complicated her treatment and allowed the cancer to spread. Her treatment included abdominoperineal resection, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, left internal iliac vein raffia and end colostomy, followed by 3D radiation therapy (50 Gy, 25 sessions) and systemic treatment with nivolumab, all of which were well tolerated. The patient was alive as of 20 August 2023, having survived for more than 3 years since the onset of symptoms.

Anorectal melanoma

Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive mucosal melanoma subtype with a poor prognosis. Although recent advancements have been seen for cutaneous melanoma, the optimal treatment paradigm for management of anorectal melanoma is evolving. In this review, we highlight differences in the pathogenesis of mucosal versus cutaneous melanoma, new concepts of staging for mucosal melanoma, updates to surgical management of anorectal melanoma, and current data for adjuvant radiation and systemic therapy in this unique patient population.

The role of histological subtypes in the survival of patients diagnosed with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma in the United States of America

BACKGROUND

Literature presents limited information on histological subtypes and their association with other factors influencing the survival of melanoma patients. To explore the risk of death due to melanoma associated with histological subtypes, this retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) data from 1998 to 2019.

METHODS

A total of 27,532 patients consisting of 15,527 males and 12,005 females. The Hypertabastic Accelerated Failure Time model was used to analyze the impact of histology on the survival of patients with cutaneous or mucosal melanoma.

RESULTS

The median survival time (MST) for cutaneous patients was 149 months, whereas those diagnosed with mucosal melanoma was 34 months. Nodular melanoma had a hazard ratio of 3.40 [95% CI: (2.94, 3.94)] compared to lentigo maligna melanoma. Across all histological subtypes, females had a longer MST, when compared to males. The hazard ratio (HR) of distant to localized melanoma was 9.56 [95% CI: (7.58, 12.07)].

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of patients' histological subtypes and their hazard assessment would enable clinicians and healthcare providers to perform personalized treatment, resulting in a lower risk of complication and higher survivability of melanoma patients. Significant factors were stage of the disease, age, histology, sex, and income. Focus should be placed on high-risk populations with severe and aggressive histological subtypes. Programs that emphasize preventive measures such as awareness, education, and early screening could reduce risk.

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in 47 patients with primary anorectal malignant melanoma in the immune therapy era

PURPOSE

Primary anorectal melanoma (ARM) accounts for approximately 1.2% of all melanomas and 16.5% of all mucosal melanomas. ARM is associated with the shortest interval to disease progression and the highest rate of metastasis; however, optimal therapeutic strategies for ARM remain controversial. This study aimed to assess the ideal surgical intervention for ARM and to determine the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

METHODS

We included 47 patients with ARM treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2011 to 2020. We performed a survival analysis for each of these groups: (i) patients with ARM (n = 47); (ii) operable non-stage IV cases at initial presentation (n = 35); and (iii) stage IV cases (n = 32).

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 53.6%, and the median OS was 78.7 months in patients with ARM. No statistically significant difference in 5-year OS was found between rectal and anal sites (50.9% vs. 56.7%). In the non-stage IV subgroup, the type of surgery (abdominoperineal resection or wide local excision) did not correlate with OS (HR 1.85; 95% CI 0.46-7.5; p = 0.39). In the stage IV subgroup, the 2-year OS of the ICI treatment group was 61.4%, whereas that of the dacarbazine regimen group was 0% (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Our ARM prognosis was better than that of previous studies. Our findings suggest that the availability of ICI therapy may improve survival in patients with advanced ARM. However, further research is warranted to identify both the clinical and molecular predictors of response to improve patient selection.

Nerve Density and Neuronal Biomarkers in Cancer

Simple Summary

Researchers have shown that tumor biomarkers and increased nerve density are important clinical tools for determining cancer prognosis and developing effective treatments. The aims of our review were to synthesize these findings by detailing the histology of peripheral nerves, discuss the use of various neuronal biomarkers in cancer, and assess the impact of increased nerve density on tumorigenesis. This review demonstrates that specific neuronal markers may have an important role in tumorigenesis and may serve as diagnostic and prognostic factors for various cancers. Moreover, increased nerve density may be associated with worse prognosis in different cancers, and cancer therapies that decrease nerve density may offer benefit to patients.

Abstract

Certain histologic characteristics of neurons, novel neuronal biomarkers, and nerve density are emerging as important diagnostic and prognostic tools in several cancers. The tumor microenvironment has long been known to promote tumor development via promoting angiogenesis and cellular proliferation, but new evidence has shown that neural proliferation and invasion in the tumor microenvironment may also enable tumor growth. Specific neuronal components in peripheral nerves and their localization in certain tumor sites have been identified and associated with tumor aggressiveness. In addition, dense neural innervation has been shown to promote tumorigenesis. In this review, we will summarize the histological components of a nerve, explore the neuronal biomarkers found in tumor sites, and discuss clinical correlates between tumor neurobiology and patient prognosis.

Implementation of robot-assisted curative resection for rare anorectal tumours on the basis of individualised treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the validity of robot-assisted curative operation for rare anorectal tumours, characterised by biological heterogeneity and anatomical complexity.

METHODS

The present study evaluated 16 consecutive patients including three with anorectal squamous cell carcinoma (ARSCC), four with anorectal mucosal melanoma (ARMM), seven with anorectal neuroendocrine tumour (ARNET), and two with other types of anorectal tumours.

RESULTS

Of the three patients with ARSCC after chemoradiotherapy, two underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR), and one underwent ultralow anterior resection (uLAR)/total intersphincteric resection (ISR), surviving 56-76 months without recurrence. Of the four ARMM patients, APR and uLAR/total ISR were conducted in two patients, respectively, with variable survival outcomes. All seven patients with ARNET were treated with uLAR/ISR and LAR, surviving for 5-106 months to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Because most anorectal tumours are confined to the dermal and submucosal layers, robotic anorectal function preserving ISR is expected to achieve R0 resection.

Management of Noncutaneous Melanomas

Noncutaneous melanomas are rare subtypes of melanoma with high rates of metastatic disease and poor overall survival. One-third to one-half of cases are amelanotic, which may contribute to a delay in diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry staining with typical melanoma markers helps confirm the diagnosis. There is no standard staging system across mucosal melanomas. Elective nodal dissection is not recommended and there is a paucity of data to support use of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Mutational analysis should be routinely performed. Systemic therapy options include targeted inhibitors, immunotherapy, and cytotoxic chemotherapy, although further studies are needed to confirm their efficacy.

Genetic alteration of Chinese patients with rectal mucosal melanoma

Background

Rectal mucosal melanoma (RMM) is a rare and highly aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Due to the rarity of RMM, there are few studies focusing on its genetic mechanism. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the genetic spectrum and prognosis of RMM in China and lay a foundation for targeted therapy.

Methods

36 patients with primary RMM from Peking University Cancer Hospital were enrolled in this study. The Next-generation sequencing (NGS) data of the tumor samples were fitted into the TruSight™ Oncology 500 (TSO500) Docker pipeline to detect genomic variants. Then, the univariate and multivariate Cox hazard analysis were performed to evaluate the correlations of the variants with the overall survival (OS), along with Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test to determine their significance.

Results

BRAF mutations, NRG1 deletions and mitotic index were significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis of the OS-related prognostic factors in primary RMM patients, it revealed 2 significant alterations: BRAF mutations [HR 7.732 (95%CI: 1.735–34.456), P = 0.007] and NRG1 deletions [HR 14.976 (95%CI: 2.305–97.300), P = 0.005].

Conclusions

This is the first study to show genetic alterations exclusively to Chinese patients with RMM. We confirmed genetic alterations of RMM differ from cutaneous melanoma (CM). Our study indicates that BRAF and NRG1 were correlated with a poor prognostic of RMM and may be potential therapeutic targets for RMM treatment.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08383-6.

Mucosal Melanomas of the Anogenital Tract: Clinical and Pathologic Predictors of Patient Survival

Primary anogenital mucosal melanomas (AGMs) are rare aggressive malignancies that are typically diagnosed at an advanced stage. Ulceration is a common feature in AGMs and may not correlate with outcome. Therefore, staging of AGMs similar to primary cutaneous melanomas, based on tumor thickness and ulceration, may not robustly predict outcome. Derivation of site-specific staging systems is essential for prognostication and optimal management of these patients. To this end, recent retrospective studies have revealed tumor thickness (TT) and mitotic rate (MR) as features of most prognostic significance as follows: in anorectal (TT only) and vulvar (TT and MR) melanomas.

Distribution pattern of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor microenvironment composition as prognostic indicators in anorectal malignant melanoma

Anorectal malignant melanoma (ARMM) is a rare disease with poor prognosis. Determining ARMM prognosis precisely is difficult due to the lack of proper assessment techniques. Immunotherapy has proven effective against cutaneous malignant melanoma and may show efficacy in ARMM. Herein, we assessed the immune profile of ARMM to identify possible prognostic biomarkers. Twenty-two ARMM formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples were evaluated using an nCounter^® PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Validation was performed through immunohistochemical staining for CD3, CD8, Foxp3, CD68, CD163, and PD-L1. RNA analysis revealed significantly decreased scores for pathways involved in cell regulation and function, as well as chemokines, in recurrent patients compared to nonrecurrent patients. In cell-type profiling, the recurrent cases displayed significantly low tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) scores. Recurrence/death prediction models were defined using logistic regression and showed significantly lower scores in recurrent and deceased patients (all, P < 0.001) compared to those in nonrecurrent and surviving patients. The high total TIL and tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) groups had significantly better overall survival outcomes compared to the low total TIL and TAM groups (P = 0.007 and P = 0.035, respectively). In addition, the presence of CD3 + TILs in the invasion front was an independent favorable prognostic indicator (P = 0.003, hazard ratio = 0.21, 95% confidential interval, 0.01-0.41). Patients with inflamed or brisk-infiltration type tumors also had a significantly better overall survival than that of patients with immune-desert/excluded and absent/non-brisk type tumors (P = 0.03 and P = 0.0023, respectively). In conclusion, TILs have a strong prognostic value in ARMM, and the quantification of TILs and an analysis of the TIL phenotype and infiltration pattern during pathological diagnosis are essential to guide treatment strategies and accurate prognosis in ARMM.

Pathology-based Biomarkers Useful for Clinical Decisions in Melanoma

The dramatic recent advances in therapy of melanoma require a more personalized and precise diagnostic approach to aid in clinical decisions. Tissue-based biomarkers in pathology have diagnostic, prognostic and predictive relevance. Herein we review the most commonly used pathology-based biomarkers in melanoma. Most of these biomarkers are evaluated through immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) performed on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue (FFPE), and are widely available in clinical pathology laboratories. We describe the utility of MART1/Ki67, p16, PRAME, markers of lymphovascular invasion (D2-40, CD31, D2-40/MITF, CD31/SOX-10), BRAF V600E, NRAS, KIT, BAP1, ALK, NTRK, PD-L1, TERT, PTEN, iNOS, and MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) in the evaluation of melanoma specimens. Correct interpretation and awareness of the significance of these biomarkers is crucial for pathologists, dermatologists, and oncologists who take care of melanoma patients.