Efficacy and tolerability of Janus kinase inhibitors in myelofibrosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Evaluating estimated health care resource utilization and costs in patients with myelofibrosis based on transfusion status and anemia severity: A retrospective analysis of the Medicare Fee-For-Service claims data

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare but aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm that commonly affects older patients, with a mean age of onset of older than 60 years. At least a third of patients with primary MF are anemic at diagnosis, and nearly all patients become anemic over time; approximately half require red blood cell transfusions within a year of diagnosis. Anemia and transfusion dependence are leading negative prognostic factors for overall survival and are associated with diminished quality of life and increased health care-related economic burden in patients with MF.

OBJECTIVE

To describe baseline characteristics, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs as a function of transfusion status and anemia severity in patients diagnosed with MF among the US Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) population.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with MF appearing in the 100% Medicare FFS database enrolled between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020. Patients were segmented into hemoglobin level cohorts (no, mild, moderate, and severe anemia) and transfusion status cohorts (transfusion independent [TI], transfusion requiring [TR], or transfusion dependent [TD]). Across cohorts, demographics and disease characteristics were assessed at baseline; per patient per month all-cause HCRU and medical and pharmacy costs were reported during follow-up. All results were summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

The transfusion status cohort (N = 1,749) included TI (n = 980), TR (n = 559), and TD (n = 210) patients; the anemia severity cohort (N = 365) included patients with no (n = 100), mild (n = 128), moderate (n = 99), and severe (n = 38) anemia. On average, TR and TD patients or those with moderate or severe anemia had numerically higher Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than those who were TI or had mild or no anemia. TR and TD cohorts reported numerically greater all-cause outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department utilization vs the TI cohort. All-cause costs were numerically higher in the TD and TR cohorts vs the TI cohort ($14,655 and $14,249 vs $8,191). Incremental increases in HCRU and costs were also observed with increasing anemia severity. All-cause medical and pharmacy costs for no, mild, moderate, and severe anemia cohorts were $4,689, $7,268, $10,439, and $13,590, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis of the US Medicare FFS database descriptively evaluated patients by transfusion status and anemia severity and showed that costs and HCRU were numerically lower for patients with transfusion independence compared with those with transfusion dependence. Similar trends were seen when comparing patients based on anemia status, with numerically lower HCRU and cost observed with decreasing anemia severity.

Would you like to take some more ruxolitinib after your fedratinib?

In Europe, ruxolitinib and fedratinib are the only JAK2 inhibitors available in local pharmacies. According to trial data, myelofibrosis patients should mostly receive ruxolitinib as first-line treatment and fedratinib in case of failure or intolerance (depending on their profile). Is it possible to reverse the choice of these drugs? Commentary on: Palandri et al. Ruxolitinib after Fedratinib failure in patients with myelofibrosis: a real-world case series. Br J Haematol 2024; 205:1605-1609.

Comparative efficacy and hematologic safety of different dosages of JAK inhibitors in the treatment of myelofibrosis: a network meta-analysis

Background

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic landscape for MF has advanced with the development of Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) like ruxolitinib (RUX), fedratinib (FED), pacritinib (PAC), and momelotinib (MMB), aiming to alleviate symptoms and enhance patient comfort.

Methods

A network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of eleven JAKi treatment regimens across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 2340 participants. Outcomes were evaluated in terms of spleen volume reduction (SVR), total symptom score reduction (TSSR), hematological safety profiles, and overall survival (OS).

Results

RUX and MMB were superior in achieving SVR and TSSR, with significant dose-response relationships observed. PAC and MMB were associated with a decreased risk of grade 3/4 anemia and thrombocytopenia compared to other JAKis. However, no substantial benefits in OS were observed with newer JAKis compared to RUX. The poorer OS outcomes with certain PAC dosages were likely influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly severe cytopenias.

Conclusion

The introduction of JAKis significantly changed the treatment of MF. This meta-analysis reaffirms the core role of RUX and positions MMB as a potentially powerful alternative for treating symptoms and reducing spleen size. Meanwhile, MMB and PAC have a positive effect on anemia in MF while FED is more tolerable for patients with thrombocytopenia. However, it should be noted that these results are influenced by baseline patient characteristics, particularly cytopenias, which affects both management and overall survival. Therefore, there is an urgent need for personalized dosing strategies to optimize the balance between efficacy and safety, with careful consideration of patient-specific factors.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023424179.

Advances in pharmacotherapy for myelofibrosis: what is the current state of play?

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of the first JAK inhibitor (JAKi) ruxolitinib 10 years ago represented a pivotal advancement in myelofibrosis (MF) treatment, mostly in terms of spleen and symptoms response. Nowadays three more JAKi, fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib, are available for both ruxolitinib-resistant and naïve patients. Moreover, many drugs are currently being investigated, both alone and in combination with JAKi.

AREAS COVERED

In this review we discuss the long-term data of ruxolitinib and more recent evidence coming from clinical trials of fedratinib, pacritinib, and momelotinib, used as first- or second-line MF therapy. More, focus is set on data from non-JAKi drugs, such as the quite extensively studied BET-inhibitors (pelabresib) and BCL-inhibitors (navitoclax), novel target therapies, and drugs aimed to improve anemia, still representing a major determinant of reduced survival in MF.

EXPERT OPINION

It's now evident that JAKi monotherapy, though clinically effective, is rarely able to change MF natural history; novel drugs are promising but long-term data are inevitably lacking. We feel that soon MF treatment will require clinicians to select the most appropriate JAKi inhibitor, based on patient characteristics, associating either front-line or in case of early suboptimal response, non-JAKi drugs with the aim to pursue disease modification.

How I treat transplant-eligible patients with myelofibrosis

Despite the approval of Janus kinase inhibitors and novel agents for patients with myelofibrosis (MF), disease-modifying responses remain limited, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative treatment option. The number of HSCTs for MF continues to increase worldwide, but its inherent therapy-related morbidity and mortality limit its use for many patients. Furthermore, patients with MF often present at an older age, with cytopenia, splenomegaly, and severe bone marrow fibrosis, posing challenges in managing them throughout the HSCT procedure. Although implementation of molecular analyses enabled improved understanding of disease mechanisms and subsequently sparked development of novel drugs with promising activity, prospective trials in the HSCT setting are often lacking, making an evidence-based decision process particularly difficult. To illustrate how we approach patients with MF with respect to HSCT, we present 3 different clinical scenarios to capture relevant aspects that influence our decision making regarding indication for, or against, HSCT. We describe how we perform HSCT according to different risk categories and, furthermore, discuss our up-to-date approach to reduce transplant-related complications. Last, we show how to harness graft-versus-MF effects, particularly in the posttransplant period to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients.

Momelotinib in Myelofibrosis Patients With Thrombocytopenia: Post Hoc Analysis From Three Randomized Phase 3 Trials

The oral activin A receptor type I, Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), and JAK2 inhibitor momelotinib demonstrated symptom, spleen, and anemia benefits in intermediate- and high-risk myelofibrosis (MF). Post hoc analyses herein evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib in patients with MF and thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <100 × 109/L) from randomized phase 3 studies: MOMENTUM (momelotinib versus danazol; JAK inhibitor experienced); SIMPLIFY-1 (momelotinib versus ruxolitinib; JAK inhibitor naïve); and SIMPLIFY-2 (momelotinib versus best available therapy; JAK inhibitor experienced); these studies were not statistically powered to assess differences in thrombocytopenic subgroups, and these analyses are descriptive. The treatment effect of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib on week 24 response rates (spleen volume reduction ≥35%/Total Symptom Score reduction ≥50%/transfusion independence) was numerically comparable or better in thrombocytopenic patients versus the overall JAK inhibitor naive population; rates were preserved with momelotinib in thrombocytopenic patients but attenuated with ruxolitinib (momelotinib: 27%/28%/67% overall versus 39%/35%/61% in thrombocytopenic group; ruxolitinib: 29%/42%/49% overall versus 0%/22%/39% in thrombocytopenic group, respectively). In contrast to ruxolitinib, momelotinib maintained high dose intensity throughout the treatment. In the JAK inhibitor experienced population, thrombocytopenic patients had the following: (1) numerically higher symptom and transfusion independence response rates with momelotinib than in control arms; and (2) preserved spleen, symptom, and transfusion independence response rates with momelotinib relative to the overall study populations. The safety profile of momelotinib in thrombocytopenic patients was also consistent with the overall study population. In summary, momelotinib represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with MF and moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia.

A Journey Through JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) represent a group of diseases characterised by constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT pathway in a clonal myeloid precursor. The therapeutic approach aims to treat the symptom burden (headache, itching, debilitation), splenomegaly, slow down the fibrotic proliferation in the bone marrow and reduce the risk of thrombosis/bleeding whilst avoiding leukaemic transformation.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, the advent of JAK inhibitors (JAKi) has significantly broadened treatment options for these patients. In myelofibrosis, symptom control and splenomegaly reduction can improve quality of life with improved overall survival, not impacting progression into acute leukaemia. Several JAKi are available and used worldwide, and combination approaches are now being explored. In this chapter, we review the approved JAKi, highlighting its strengths, exploring potential guidelines in choosing which one to use and reasoning towards future perspectives, where the combinations of therapies seem to promise the best results.

Cross-Study Comparisons of JAK2 Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis: Risks and Recommendations

With multiple Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved or in late development for myelofibrosis, there is a logical desire in the field for comparative efficacy and safety data among these agents in order to inform treatment selection. However, due to the highly disparate nature of patient populations enrolled in different JAK inhibitor trials, as well as key differences in study design, any cross-study comparative analyses should be undertaken with a high degree of caution. Here, we show how differences in enrolled populations can impact both efficacy and safety conclusions and why quantitative comparisons of outcomes across studies is prone to spurious conclusions. We conclude by offering guidance on how to approach comparative analyses in the absence of direct head-to-head data based on a thorough understanding of how study design impacts outcomes. Ultimately there is enough room in the myelofibrosis treatment landscape for multiple JAK inhibitors, and sequencing of therapies should depend on how each agent was studied and where it showed the most benefit, both in trials and in real-world practice.

Novel Janus-kinase (JAK) Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

JAK inhibitors (JAKis), used in the treatment of myelofibrosis, have entered standard treatment, providing significant improvements in spleen size and symptom burden. Although splenomegaly provides a reduction and some improvement in cytopenia, there is still a way to go. Novel JAKis are being investigated to overcome barriers to treatment access, such as therapeutic challenges, intolerance, and unresponsiveness.

AREAS COVERED

This review includes the current status of JAKi treatment for myelofibrosis, mainly focusing on investigational JAKis; jaktinib, lestaurtinib, itacitinib, gandotinib, BMS-911543, ilginatinib, TQ05105, and flonoltinib maleate. MEDLINE and clinicaltrials.gov were screened to identify all completed or active studies on this topic. The outcomes of the preclinical studies and clinical trials are presented and discussed for each drug.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients with myelofibrosis, momelotinib was effective in treating anemia, whereas jaktinib was effective in both anemia and Total Symptom Score (TSS). More phase 3 studies are needed to provide more precise evidence. The increasing variety of JAKis will allow for more personalized treatment options for myelofibrosis in the future. The potential impact on disease progression, molecular responses, and the duration of this response will become important parameters for future evaluations of these drugs.

Myeloid Leukemia of Down Syndrome

Myeloid leukemia of Down syndrome (ML-DS) is characterized by a distinct natural history and is classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as an independent entity, occurring with unique clinical and molecular features. The presence of a long preleukemic, myelodysplastic phase, called transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM), precedes the initiation of ML-DS and is defined by unusual chromosomal findings. Individuals with constitutional trisomy 21 have a profound dosage imbalance in the hematopoiesis-governing genes located on chromosome 21 and thus are subject to impaired fetal as well as to neonatal erythro-megakaryopoiesis. Almost all neonates with DS develop quantitative and morphological hematological abnormalities, yet still only 5-10% of them present with one of the preleukemic or leukemic conditions of DS. The acquired mutations in the key hematopoietic transcription factor gene GATA1, found solely in cells trisomic for chromosome 21, are considered to be the essential step for the selective growth advantage of leukemic cells. While the majority of cases of TAM remain clinically 'silent' or undergo spontaneous remission, the remaining 20% to 30% of them progress into ML-DS until the age of 4 years. The hypersensitivity of ML-DS blasts to chemotherapeutic agents, including but not limited to cytarabine, and drugs' increased infectious and cardiac toxicity have necessitated the development of risk-adapted treatment protocols for children with ML-DS. Recent advances in cytogenetics and specific molecular mechanisms involved in the evolution of TAM and ML-DS are reviewed here, as well as their integration in the improvement of risk stratification and targeted management of ML-DS.

Ten years after ruxolitinib approval for myelofibrosis: a review of clinical efficacy

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by splenomegaly, abnormal cytokine expression, cytopenias, and progressive bone marrow fibrosis. The disease often manifests with burdensome symptoms and is associated with reduced survival. Ruxolitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2 inhibitor, was the first agent approved for MF. As a first-in-class targeted treatment, ruxolitinib approval transformed the MF treatment approach and remains standard of care. In addition, targeted inhibition of JAK1/JAK2 signaling, a key molecular pathway underlying MF pathogenesis, and the large volume of literature evaluating ruxolitinib, have led to a better understanding of the disease and improved management in general. Here we review ruxolitinib efficacy in patients with MF in the 10 years following approval, including demonstration of clinical benefit in the phase 3 COMFORT-I/II trials, real-world evidence, translational studies, and expanded access data. Lastly, future directions for MF treatment are discussed, including ruxolitinib-based combination therapies.

Myelofibrosis

The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.

Momelotinib versus danazol in symptomatic patients with anaemia and myelofibrosis (MOMENTUM): results from an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors approved for myelofibrosis provide spleen and symptom improvements but do not meaningfully improve anaemia. Momelotinib, a first-in-class inhibitor of activin A receptor type 1 as well as JAK1 and JAK2, has shown symptom, spleen, and anaemia benefits in myelofibrosis. We aimed to confirm the differentiated clinical benefits of momelotinib versus the active comparator danazol in JAK-inhibitor-exposed, symptomatic patients with anaemia and intermediate-risk or high-risk myelofibrosis.

METHODS

MOMENTUM is an international, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study that enrolled patients at 107 sites across 21 countries worldwide. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with a confirmed diagnosis of primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive momelotinib (200 mg orally once per day) plus danazol placebo (ie, the momelotinib group) or danazol (300 mg orally twice per day) plus momelotinib placebo (ie, the danazol group), stratified by total symptom score (TSS; <22 vs ≥22), spleen size (<12 cm vs ≥12 cm), red blood cell or whole blood units transfused in the 8 weeks before randomisation (0 units vs 1-4 units vs ≥5 units), and study site. The primary endpoint was the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) TSS response rate at week 24 (defined as ≥50% reduction in mean MFSAF TSS over the 28 days immediately before the end of week 24 compared with baseline). MOMENTUM is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04173494, and is active but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

195 patients were randomly assigned to either the momelotinib group (130 [67%]) or danazol group (65 [33%]) and received study treatment in the 24-week randomised treatment period between April 24, 2020, and Dec 3, 2021. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the momelotinib group reported a 50% or more reduction in TSS than in the danazol group (32 [25%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65; proportion difference 16% [95% CI 6-26], p=0·0095). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were haematological abnormalities by laboratory values: anaemia (79 [61%] of 130 vs 49 [75%] of 65) and thrombocytopenia (36 [28%] vs 17 [26%]). The most frequent non-haematological grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events with momelotinib and danazol were acute kidney injury (four [3%] of 130 vs six [9%] of 65) and pneumonia (three [2%] vs six [9%]).

INTERPRETATION

Treatment with momelotinib, compared with danazol, resulted in clinically significant improvements in myelofibrosis-associated symptoms, anaemia measures, and spleen response, with favourable safety. These findings support the future use of momelotinib as an effective treatment in patients with myelofibrosis, especially in those with anaemia.

FUNDING

Sierra Oncology.

BOREAS: a global, phase III study of the MDM2 inhibitor navtemadlin (KRT-232) in relapsed/refractory myelofibrosis

Patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who discontinue ruxolitinib due to progression/resistance have poor prognoses. JAK inhibitors control symptoms and reduce spleen volumes with limited impact on underlying disease pathophysiology. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2), a negative regulator of p53, is overexpressed in circulating malignant CD34+ MF cells. The oral MDM2 inhibitor navtemadlin (KRT-232) restores p53 activity to drive apoptosis of wild-type TP53 tumor cells by inducing expression of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Navtemadlin demonstrated promising clinical and disease-modifying activity and acceptable safety in a phase II study in patients with relapsed/refractory MF. The randomized phase III BOREAS study compares the efficacy and safety of navtemadlin to best available therapy in patients with MF that is relapsed/refractory to JAK inhibitor treatment.

Advances in molecular characterization of myeloid proliferations associated with Down syndrome

Myeloid leukemia associated with Down syndrome (ML-DS) has a unique molecular landscape that differs from other subtypes of acute myeloid leukemia. ML-DS is often preceded by a myeloproliferative neoplastic condition called transient abnormal myelopoiesis (TAM) that disrupts megakaryocytic and erythroid differentiation. Over the last two decades, many genetic and epigenetic changes in TAM and ML-DS have been elucidated. These include overexpression of molecules and micro-RNAs located on chromosome 21, GATA1 mutations, and a range of other somatic mutations and chromosomal alterations. In this review, we summarize molecular changes reported in TAM and ML-DS and provide a comprehensive discussion of these findings. Recent advances in the development of CRISPR/Cas9-modified induced pluripotent stem cell-based disease models are also highlighted. However, despite significant progress in this area, we still do not fully understand the pathogenesis of ML-DS, and there are no targeted therapies. Initial diagnosis of ML-DS has a favorable prognosis, but refractory and relapsed disease can be difficult to treat; therapeutic options are limited in Down syndrome children by their stronger sensitivity to the toxic effects of chemotherapy. Because of the rarity of TAM and ML-DS, large-scale multi-center studies would be helpful to advance molecular characterization of these diseases at different stages of development and progression.

Fedratinib, the first selective JAK2 inhibitor approved for treatment of myelofibrosis - an option beyond ruxolitinib

Introduction: Myelofibrosis, a life shortening clonal disorder, presents with a constellation of features: bone marrow fibrosis, abnormal blood counts, extramedullary hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, thrombohemorrhagic complications and constitutional symptoms. Until recently Ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and 2 inhibitor, has been the only targeted therapy available for transplant-ineligible patients requiring treatment for splenomegaly and disease related symptoms. However, most patients discontinue Ruxolitinib after 3-5 years, mostly due to loss of response. There has been an unmet need for this patient group. In August 2019 Fedratinib (INREBIC® capsules, Impact Biomedicines, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Meyer Squibb), a JAK2 inhibitor, was approved by US FDA for treatment of myelofibrosis in both JAK inhibitor naïve and pre-treated patients for the management of symptoms and splenomegaly.Areas covered: Here, we discuss the development, evidence base to date for Fedratinib. Including early and late phase, and ongoing trials, safety issues, potential role and current position of Fedratinib in the treatment of myelofibrosis, as well as future direction of targeted therapy in myelofibrosis.Expert opinion: Fedratinib presents a much needed option of treatment, particularly, for patients failing Ruxolitinib, with response rates that are quite similar. Nonetheless, there remain important questions including sequencing and options for combining therapy.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Novel Therapies in Development for Myelofibrosis

Myeloproliferative neoplasms research has entered a dynamic and exciting era as we witness exponential growth of novel agents in advanced/early phase clinical trials for myelofibrosis (MF). Building on the success and pivotal role of ruxolitinib, many novel agents, spanning a wide range of mechanisms/targets (epigenetic regulation, apoptotic/intracellular signaling pathways, telomerase, bone marrow fibrosis) are in clinical development; several are studied in registrational trials and hold great potential to expand the therapeutic arsenal/shift the treatment paradigm if regulatory approval is granted. Insight into MF pathogenesis and its molecular underpinnings, preclinical studies demonstrating synergism of ruxolitinib with investigational agents, urgent unmet clinical needs (cytopenias, loss of response to JAK inhibitors); and progressive disease fueled the rapid rise of innovative therapeutics. New strategies include pairing ruxolitinib with erythroid maturation agents to manage anemia (luspatercept), designing rational combinations with ruxolitinib to boost responses in both the frontline and suboptimal response settings (pelabresib, navitoclax, parsaclisib), treatment with non-JAK inhibitor monotherapy in the second-line setting (navtemadlin, imetelstat), novel JAK inhibitors tailored to subgroups with challenging unmet needs (momelotinib and pacritinib for anemia and thrombocytopenia, respectively); and agents potentially enhancing longevity (imetelstat). Beyond typical endpoints evaluated in MF clinical trials (spleen volume reduction ≥ 35%, total symptom score reduction ≥ 50%) thus far, emerging endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, transfusion independence, anemia benefits, bone marrow fibrosis and driver mutation allele burden reduction. Novel biomarkers and additional clinical features are being sought to assess new agents and tailor emerging therapies to appropriate patients. New strategies are needed to optimize the design of clinical trials comparing novel combinations to standard agent monotherapy.

Management of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs)

PURPOSE

To provide up to date guidance, practice recommendations and highlight barriers to medication adherence in the long-term management of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs).

AIM

Current drug therapy for MPN is not curative and has not been shown to prolong survival. The main indication for treatment is the prevention of thrombosis and medication adherence remains a challenge in this group of patients. Identifying potentially modifiable barriers to medication adherence including primary nonadherence and non-persistent adherence enables timely interventions to be put in place and improve overall medication adherence.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature and expert opinions was performed using electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) that were searched for articles reporting MPN and medication adherence. Discussions A case vignette is discussed throughout the article and expert opinion with international peer reviewed guidelines that are authored to support clinical decision making at the point of care were utilised. The evidence base was combined with more practical/clinical (data based) insight from real world clinical practice. Adoption of a broad range of digital health care activities and services in the health care system (telehealth applications) by the advanced practice providers (Non-Medical Prescribers-NMPs) in MPN clinics included medication prescribing and management, oral drug compliance and adherence evaluations, interventions, chronic care management, counselling and patient education on treatments.

CONCLUSION

Current drug therapy for MPN is neither curative nor has it been shown to prolong survival, and medication adherence remains a challenge in this group of patients. The longevity of the patients' disease course may contribute to the high risk of non-adherence in this patient cohort. Poor adherence to long-term therapies severely compromises the effectiveness of treatment. Adherence interventions should be tailored to the needs of the patient in order to achieve maximum impact. Interventions aimed at improving adherence provide the best experience and outcome for the patient and their families and can have a profound impact on the quality of life and mitigation of disease consequences.

Momelotinib: an emerging treatment for myelofibrosis patients with anemia

The suite of marked anemia benefits that momelotinib has consistently conferred on myelofibrosis (MF) patients stem from its unique inhibitory activity on the BMP6/ACVR1/SMAD and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathways, resulting in decreased hepcidin (master iron regulator) expression, higher serum iron and hemoglobin levels, and restored erythropoiesis. Clinical data on momelotinib from the phase 2 and the two phase 3 SIMPLIFY trials consistently demonstrated high rates of sustained transfusion-independence. In a recent phase 2 translational study, 41% of the patients achieved transfusion independence for ≥ 12 weeks. In the phase 3 trials SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2, 17% more JAK inhibitor-naïve patients and two-fold more JAK inhibitor-treated patients achieved or maintained transfusion independence with momelotinib versus ruxolitinib and best available therapy (89% ruxolitinib), respectively. Anemia is present in approximately a third of MF patients at diagnosis, eventually developing in nearly all patients. The need for red blood cell transfusions is an independent adverse risk factor for both overall survival and leukemic transformation. Presently, FDA-approved medications to address anemia are lacking. Momelotinib is one of the prime candidates to durably address the critical unmet needs of MF patients with moderate/severe anemia. Importantly, momelotinib may have overall survival benefits in frontline and second-line MF patients. MOMENTUM is an international registration-track phase 3 trial further assessing momelotinib’s unique constellation of anemia and other benefits in second-line MF patients; the results of the MOMENTUM trial are keenly awaited and may lead to regulatory approval of momelotinib.