Eltrombopag is an effective and safe therapy for refractory thrombocytopenia after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019;54:1310-1318. [PMID: 30664724 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-019-0435-2]

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists in Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Complicated by Prolonged Thrombocytopenia: A Comprehensive Review

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a well-established procedure that has become a therapeutic mainstay for various hematological conditions. Prolonged thrombocytopenia following HCT is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality, yet no universally recognized treatment protocol exists for such a complication. First-generation thrombopoietin receptor (TpoR) agonists as well as second-generation agents are known for their role in enhancing platelet production, and their use is expanding across various thrombocytopenic conditions. Therefore, we conducted this comprehensive review of the literature to provide an updated evaluation of the use of TpoR agonists and explore their efficacy and safety in the treatment of extended post-HCT thrombocytopenia. The literature search was conducted using PubMed database from 1996 through December 2023, using a predefined strategy with medical subject headings terms. We identified 64 reports on the utility of TpoR agonists, five of them were randomized controlled trials and the rest were retrospective observational studies and case series, with a total number of 1730 patients. Second-generation TpoR agonists appear more convenient than subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTpo) as they can be orally administered and exhibit similar efficacy in platelet recovery, as indicated by recent trial results. Among these agents, avatrombopag, unlike eltrombopag, does not require any dietary restrictions, which could be more favorable for patients. However, eltrombopag remains the most extensively studied agent. TpoR agonists had promising effects in the treatment of post-HCT thrombocytopenia with a good safety profile so far, highlighting the potential benefit of their use.

Efficacy and safety of avatrombopag in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after umbilical cord blood transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed platelet engraftment is a common complication after umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT), and there is no standard therapy. Avatrombopag (AVA) is a second-generation thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist (TPO-RA) that has shown efficacy in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, few reports have focused on its efficacy in patients diagnosed with thrombocytopenia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of AVA as a first-line TPO-RA in 65 patients after UCBT; these patients were compared with 118 historical controls. Response rates, platelet counts, megakaryocyte counts in bone marrow, bleeding events, adverse events and survival rates were evaluated in this study. Platelet reconstitution differences were compared between different medication groups. Multivariable analysis was used to explore the independent beneficial factors for platelet implantation.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were given AVA within 30 days post-UCBT, and the treatment was continued for more than 7 days to promote platelet engraftment (AVA group); the other 13 patients were given AVA for secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR group). The median time to platelet engraftment was shorter in the AVA group than in the historical control group (32.5 days vs. 38.0 days, Z = 2.095, P = 0.036). Among the 52 patients in the AVA group, 46 achieved an overall response (OR) (88.5%), and the cumulative incidence of OR was 91.9%. Patients treated with AVA only had a greater 60-day cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment than patients treated with recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) only or rhTPO combined with AVA (95.2% vs. 84.5% vs. 80.6%, P <0.001). Patients suffering from SFPR had a slightly better cumulative incidence of OR (100%, P = 0.104). Patients who initiated AVA treatment within 14 days post-UCBT had a better 60-day cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment than did those who received AVA after 14 days post-UCBT (96.6% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

In summary, compared with those in the historical control group, our results indicate that AVA could effectively promote platelet engraftment and recovery after UCBT, especially when used in the early period (≤14 days post-UCBT).

Eltrombopag treatment in thrombocytopenia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A multicenter real-world experience

INTRODUCTION

Thrombocytopenia is among the most common complications following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity with no standard treatment yet. In this multicenter and retrospective study, we aim to present our multi-center experience of Eltrombopag treatment in patients with isolated thrombocytopenia following HSCT.

MATERIAL-METHOD

A total of 73 patients from 5 centers who underwent autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation, had no primary disease relapse, all of whom had neutrophil engraftment, complete chimerism, and who were diagnosed with Prolonged Isolated Thrombocytopenia (PIT) or Secondary Failure Of Platelet Recovery (SFPR) were included in the study. The patients were initiated on Eltrombopag at a dose of 50-150 mg. Complete response was defined as a platelet count >50×109/L for 7 consecutive days with no transfusion support.

RESULTS

A total of 50.3% of the patients underwent Autologous and 49.7% Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, 54.8% were diagnosed with PIT, and 45.2% were diagnosed with SFPR, and the treatment with 50-150 mg/day Eltrombopag was initiated on the median day +42. Complete response was achieved in 71.2% of these patients on the median day 23 of the treatment. No significant effects of the initial dose (50-150 mg/day) were detected in the Complete Response in the multivariate analysis on response. An insufficient number of Megakaryocytes in the bone marrow before Eltrombopag treatment was determined as an independent risk factor in determining the response (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.21-10.55). The overall survival of the patients who did not respond to Eltrombopag was found to be significantly worse than that of patients who responded (p=0.022, HR:2.74, 95% CI 1.12-6.54).

CONCLUSION

As a result of the present study, Eltrombopag treatment was found to be effective and safe in thrombocytopenia that develops following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It was concluded that its use may be more effective in patients with sufficient bone marrow megakaryocytes before the treatment and an initial dose of 50 mg/day may be appropriate in terms of cost, effectiveness, and toxicity. Large-scale randomized and controlled prospective studies are needed to determine the roles of Eltrombopag treatment in patients with post-transplant PIT and SFPR.

Eltrombopag can promote platelet implantation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as safely and similarly to thrombopoietin

Background

Eltrombopag has demonstrated efficacy in treating low platelet (PLT) levels, but it remains unclear whether eltrombopag can promote PLT engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

Forty-one HSCT patients received eltrombopag 50 mg/d from +1 day until PLT >50 × 109/L or 1 month after HSCT. Fifty-one patients in the same period received thrombopoietin (TPO) to promote PLT graft after HSCT and served as a control group.

Results

A total of 51 patients who applied TPO during the same period were treated as a control. In the eltrombopag group, the median time to white blood cells (WBC) graft was 12 days (range, 10-17 days) and the PLT graft was 15 days (range, 10-30 days), whereas for the patients in the TPO group, the median time to WBC and PLT graft was 12 days (range, 9-23 days) and 15.5 days (range, 9-41 days), respectively. In the first month after HSCT, the median WBC count in the eltrombopag group was 4.41 × 109/L (range, 0.87-40.01 × 109/L) and the median PLT was 89x109/L (range, 30-401 × 109/L); the median WBC and PLT \counts in the TPO group were 4.65 × 109/L (range, 0.99-23.63 × 109/L) and 86 × 109/L (range, 5-512 × 109/L), respectively. Patients in the TPO or eltrombopag group did not experience serious side effects after drug administration, and the difference in side effects on liver and kidney function between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Eltrombopag is safe and similarly promotes platelet engraftment to thrombopoietin after allogeneic HSCT.

Eltrombopag improves platelet engraftment after haploidentical bone marrow transplantation: Results of a Phase II study

Slow platelet recovery frequently occurs after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) with bone marrow graft and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PCy)-based graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Improved platelet recovery may reduce the need for transfusions and improve outcomes. We investigated the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, at enhancing platelet recovery post-haplo-HSCT. The prospective study included patients ≥18 years of age who received haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy. Patients received eltrombopag 300 mg/day starting on Day +5. The primary objective was to estimate platelet engraftment (>50 000/μL by Day 60). In a post hoc analysis, they were compared to a contemporary matched control group who did not receive eltrombopag. One hundred ten patients were included in the analysis (30 eltrombopag and 80 control). Seventy-three percent and 50% of patients in the eltrombopag group and control group, respectively, attained >50 000/μL platelet count by Day 60 (p = .043). No eltrombopag-related grade ≥4 adverse events were observed. Median time to platelet recovery (>20 000/μL) was 29 days with eltrombopag and 31 days for controls (p = .022), while its cumulative incidence was 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78%-100%) with eltrombopag versus 67.5% (95% CI: 57%-78%) for controls (p = .014). Number of platelet transfusions received, overall survival, progression-free survival, GVHD rate, relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality were similar between groups. Overall, eltrombopag is safe and improves platelet recovery in patients undergoing haplo-HSCT with bone marrow graft and PCy.

Thrombopoietin level predicts the response to avatrombopag treatment for persistent thrombocytopenia after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Persistent thrombocytopenia (PT) has an unsatisfactory response to therapy after haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of avatrombopag treatment in 69 patients with PT following haplo-HSCT and assessed whether baseline thrombopoietin (TPO) levels could predict treatment response. Overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) were defined as increased platelet levels to over 20 × 109/L or 50 × 109/L independent of platelet transfusion during or within 7 days of the end of avatrombopag treatment, respectively. The incidences of OR and CR were 72.5% and 58.0%, with a median of 11 and 29 days to OR and CR, respectively. ROC analysis suggested that the optimally discriminant baseline TPO level threshold for both OR and CR to avatrombopag was ≤ 1714 pg/mL. In multivariate analysis, a lower baseline TPO level (P = 0.005) was a significant independent factor of response to avatrombopag. For patients resistant to other TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), 9/16 (56.3%) exhibited a response after switching to avatrombopag. Avatrombopag was well tolerated, and responders achieved improved overall survival (79.0% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.001). In conclusion, avatrombopag is a potential safe and effective treatment for PT after haplo-HSCT, and lower baseline TPO levels predicted a better response.

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists for refractory thrombocytopenia in patients after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell (ASC) transplantation (ASCT) is an effective treatment method for patients with hematological disorders and malignant diseases. The patient's ASCs are harvested prior to radiotherapy/chemotherapy, cryopreserved and then transfused back after the high-dose radiotherapy/chemotherapy conditioning treatment. Since some patients develop thrombocytopenia after receiving ASCT, it is difficult for them to bear simultaneously the management of their original disease and thrombocytopenia. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thrombocytopenia therapy with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPORAs) after ASCT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical safety and efficacy of TPORA treatment for the enrolled 20 patients who developed thrombocytopenia after ASCT. The measured parameters were prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT), secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) and other calculated response index. Patients with platelet count (PC) ≤ 50×109/L were treated with TPORA, namely with either eltrombopag (Elt), hetrombopag (Het), or avatrobopag (Ava).

RESULTS

The group of 20 patients, who received TPORA administration for their thrombocytopenia after ASCT, had a median age of 50 years (ranging between 17 and 60 years). The median administration time of TPORA application was 48 days (ranging from 7 to 451 days); an overall response rate (ORR) was 85% with no response in 15% of patients, while with complete response (CR) in 70% of patients and partial response (PR) in 15% of patients. The median platelet count was 19 × 109/L before TPORA treatment and increased to 87×109)/L after the treatment. The TPORA treatment was safe as only 4 patients (20%) displayed a mild transaminase elevation. No other reported side effects occurred, such as thrombosis, joint pain, diarrhea, and myelofibrosis. It was demonstrated that the short response time to TPORA treatment correlated to the fast platelet recovery, when the number of megakaryocytes in the bone marrow smear exceeded 35/4.5 cm2 under a low magnification of 100 times (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

TPORA therapy for thrombocytopenia occurring after the radiotherapy/ chemotherapy-conditioned ASCT was well tolerated and effective for platelets recovery.

Definitions, incidence and outcome of poor graft function after hematopoietic cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is a serious complication with high morbidity and mortality. The reported incidence of PGF, its risk factors and outcome vary substantially between studies. This variability may be explained by heterogeneity in patient cohorts and HCT strategies, differences in the underlying causes of cytopenia, as well as by differences in PGF definition. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we provide an overview of the various PGF definitions used and determined the impact of this variability on the reported incidence and outcome. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science up to July 2022, for any study on PGF in HCT recipients. We performed random-effect meta-analyses for incidence and outcome and subgroup analyses based on different PGF criteria. Among 69 included studies (14.265 HCT recipients), we found 63 different PGF definitions, using various combinations of 11 common criteria. The median incidence of PGF was 7% (IQR: 5-11%, 22 cohorts). The pooled survival of PGF patients was 53% (95% CI: 45-61%, 23 cohorts). The most commonly reported risk factors associated with PGF were history of cytomegalovirus infection and prior graft-versus-host disease. Incidence was lower in studies with strict cytopenic cutoffs, while survival was lower for primary compared to secondary PGF. This work indicates that a standardized, quantitative definition of PGF is needed to facilitate clinical guideline development and to advance scientific progress.

Avatrombopag for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in children's patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: A pilot study

Thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a common and life-threatening complication. Thus, new prevention and treatment strategies for post-HSCT thrombocytopenia are urgently required. In recent studies, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) for treating post-HSCT thrombocytopenia indicated efficiency and safety. The improved effect of post-HSCT thrombocytopenia in adults was found in the administration of avatrombopag which was a new TPO-RA. However, there was no relevant study in the children's cohort. Herein, we retrospectively analyzed the effect of avatrombopag in post-HSCT thrombocytopenia in children. As a result, the overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) were 91% and 78%, respectively. Furthermore, both cumulative ORR and CRR were significantly lower in the poor graft function (PGF)/secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) group compared to the engraftment-promotion group (86.7% vs. 100%, p = 0.002 and 65.0% vs. 100%, p < 0.001, respectively). Achieving OR required a median of 16 days in the PGF/SFPR group while 7 days in the engraftment-promotion group (p = 0.003). Grade III-IV acute graft vs. host disease and inadequate megakaryocytes were identified as risk factors of CRR only in univariate analysis (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). No severe adverse events were documented. Conclusively, avatrombopag is an alternatively efficient and safe agent for treating post-HSCT thrombocytopenia in children.

Avatrombopag for the treatment of thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Background:

Thrombocytopenia post hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HCT) usually contributes to poor outcomes with no standardized treatment. Eltrombopag and romiplostim can be feasible for post-HCT thrombocytopenia, but the use of avatrombopag has not yet been evaluated.

Objectives:

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag treatment in patients diagnosed with post-HCT thrombocytopenia.

Design:

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag treatment in a cohort of 61 patients diagnosed with thrombocytopenia post HCT in our clinical center.

Methods:

Avatrombopag was initiated at 20 mg daily, with a dosage adjustment to achieve platelet recovery to >20 × 10⁹/l independent from transfusion for 7 consecutive days (overall response, OR) or to >50 × 10⁹/l free from transfusion for 7 consecutive days (complete response, CR). Factors influencing OR and CR were studied in univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. Within the follow-up, adverse events like myelofibrosis, thrombosis, and organ toxicities were monitored carefully.

Results:

The overall response rate (ORR) to avatrombopag was 68.9% and the cumulative incidence (CI) of OR was 69.1%. The complete response rate (CRR) and the CI of CR were both 39.3%. The median days from avatrombopag initiation to OR and CR were 21 and 25 days, respectively. An adequate number of megakaryocytes before the initiation of avatrombopag was an independent protective factor of avatrombopag treatment for OR (hazard ratio, HR = 4.628, 95% confidence interval 1.92–11.15, p = 0.0006) and CR (HR = 4.892, 95% confidence interval 1.58–15.18, p = 0.006). Avatrombopag was well tolerated in all patients with no severe adverse events.

Conclusion:

Our findings suggested that avatrombopag can be optional for thrombocytopenia post HCT.

Oral eltrombopag versus subcutaneous recombinant human thrombopoietin for promoting platelet engraftment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A prospective, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial

Delayed platelet engraftment (DPE) is associated with poor survival and increased transplantation-related mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Therefore, treatments are needed to improve platelet engraftment and prevent DPE. We performed a phase three, non-inferior, randomized controlled study of eltrombopag or recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) to promot platelet engraftment after allo-HSCT. Candidates for allo-HSCT were randomly assigned to receive oral eltrombopag (50 mg daily) or subcutaneous rhTPO (15000U daily) from the first-day post-transplantation. The primary endpoint was the cumulative numbers of platelet engraftment (platelet recovery ≥20 × 10⁹ /L, without transfusion, for seven consecutive days) on day 60 after transplantation. We performed intention-to-treat analyses with a non-inferior margin of -15%. A total of 92 participants underwent randomization. 44 and 48 patients were randomized to the eltrombopag and rhTPO groups, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 360 days (range: 12-960 days). The cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment on day 60 after transplantation in eltrombopag group was 86.4% (38/44) compared with 85.4% (41/48) in the rhTPO group (absolute risk difference [ARD] 1%, one-sided lower limit of 95% confidence interval [CI] -13.28%, P_{non-inferirioty}  = 0.014). The rate of DPE in the eltrombopag group was 6.8% (3/44) compared with 12.5% (6/48) in the rhTPO group (ARD -5.7%, one-sided higher limit of 95% CI 6.28%, P_{non-inferirioty}  = 0.063). Approximately, three-fourths of non-hematologic adverse events were not observed in the eltrombopag group but three patients (3/48, 6%) experienecd them in the rhTPO group. In addition, platelet transfusions unite from day 0 to day 21, or from day 22 to day 60, progression-free survival, overall survival were not significantly different between both groups. Eltrombopag was non-inferior to rhTPO in promoting platelet engraftment post allo-HSCT for patients with hematological malignancy. Oral eltrombopag was more convenient for patients than subcutaneous rhTPO (NCT03515096).

Efficacy of Eltrombopag in Children with Post-Stem Cell Transplant Prolonged Isolated Thrombocytopenia

Prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT) is a complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation that results in prolonged transfusion dependence. Recently, the efficacy of a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (eltrombopag) against PIT has been reported in adults; however, there are few reports in children. A 4-year-old male pediatric patient diagnosed with congenital pure red cell aplasia underwent allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Neutrophil engraftment was observed on post-transplant Day 26; however, platelet counts remained <10 × 109/L. Transfusions were required 1−2 times a week for at least 4 months. On post-transplant Day 124, oral eltrombopag (up to 2.4 mg/kg/day) was initiated. Thereafter, the platelet counts were maintained at ≥10 × 109/L, and the patient became transfusion independent. At 2 years and 6 months after the oral administration, no chromosomal abnormalities, thromboembolism, or myelofibrosis was observed. Thus, eltrombopag can be a potential treatment option for pediatric PIT.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag Combined With MSCs for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Platelet graft failure (PGF) is a frequent and serious complication after Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and lacks effective treatment strategies, which could affect the prognosis of patients and even cause death. The exact underlying mechanism of PGF remains unclear, and lacks standard treatment. Here, we conduct a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag combined with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in 16 patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT. Patients were administered the following treatment regimen: 20 mg/d avatrombopag; if the PLT count was less than 50×10^{^}9/L for at least 2 weeks, the dose was increased to 40 mg/d; if the PLT count was 200-400×10^{^}9/L, the dose was reduced; and if the PLT count was greater than 400×10^9/L, avatrombopag was terminated. Umbilical cord MSCs (1×10^{^}6 cells/kg) infusion was performed every week for 4-6 weeks. Among the 16 patients, 13 patients (81.3%) achieved a complete response (CR), 2 patients (12.5%) got a partial response (PR), and 1 patient (6.3%) had no response (NR). The median time to obtain CR was 32 (7-426) days after treatment with avatrombopag combined with umbilical cord MSCs. The time to reach 20×10^{^}9/L≤ PLT <50×10^{^}9/L in the 2 patients with PR was 52 and 230 days after treatment, respectively. One patient had a severe pulmonary infection and died of cytomegalovirus pneumonia. Overall, our results indicated that combination of avatrombopag with MSCs can promote platelet recovery after transplantation, thereby improving the survival rate of patients and improving the quality of life of patients after transplantation, and providing a new method and strategy for the treatment of thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT.

Efficacy and Immunomodulating Properties of Eltrombopag in Aplastic Anemia following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) are currently indicated for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia and relapsed refractory aplastic anemia. However, the off-label use of these drugs is more and more frequent, including in the setting of aplasia secondary to chemotherapy and hemopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT). Growing evidence suggests that mechanisms of action of TPO-RA go beyond the TPO-receptor stimulation and point at the immunomodulating properties of these drugs. Here, we present a case of prolonged bone marrow aplasia secondary to autologous SCT treated with eltrombopag. We describe the clinical efficacy and the immunomodulating effect of this drug on inflammatory cytokine profile and bone marrow histology. Furthermore, we provide a review of the most recent literature highlighting the efficacy and safety of TPO-RA after SCT and chemotherapy for hematologic conditions.

Thrombocytopenia and Therapeutic Strategies after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Thrombocytopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a usual complication and can lead to high morbidity and mortality. New strategies, such as the use of another graft versus host-disease prophylaxis, alternative donors, and management of infections, have improved the survival of these patients. The mechanisms are unknown; therefore, the identification of new strategies to manage this potentially serious problem is needed. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists are currently available to stimulate platelet production. Some small retrospective studies have reported their potential efficacy in an allogeneic stem cell transplant setting, confirming good tolerability. Recent studies with higher numbers of patients also support their safety and efficacy in this setting, hence establishing the use of these drugs as a promising strategy for this post-transplant complication. However, prospective trials are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy of Recombinant Human Thrombopoietin for the Treatment of Secondary Failure of Platelet Recovery After Allogeneic HSCT

Secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) is a life-threatening complication that may affect up to 20% of patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this study, to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO), we retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who received continuous rhTPO for the treatment of SFPR. Overall response and complete response were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients and 10 (34.5%) patients, at a median time of 21.5 days (range, 3-41 days) and 39.5 days (range, 7-53 days) after initiation of rhTPO treatment, respectively. Among the responders, the probability of keeping overall response and complete response at 1 year after response was 77.3% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, higher CD34⁺ cells (≥3 × 10⁶/kg) infused during HSCT (HR: 7.22, 95% CI: 1.53-34.04, P = 0.01) and decreased ferritin after rhTPO treatment (HR: 6.16, 95% CI: 1.18-32.15, P = 0.03) were indicated to associate with complete response to rhTPO. Importantly, rhTPO was well tolerated in all patients without side effects urging withdrawal and clinical intervention. The results of this study suggest that rhTPO may be a safe and effective treatment for SFPR.

Efficacy and safety of thrombopoietin receptor agonists in the treatment of thrombocytopenia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Thrombocytopenia is a tough complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with elusive pathogenesis and lack of well-established therapies. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) have been used for thrombocytopenia post HSCT in recent years, but the outcomes remain debatable. We conducted this meta-analysis and systematic-review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TPO-RAs for platelet recovery after HSCT. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies on the application of TPO-RAs (eltrombopag and romiplostim) in the settings of primary or secondary thrombocytopenia after HSCT by 17 March 2021. Efficacy outcomes included response rate and survival rate, and adverse events were also evaluated. A total of 19 studies involving 378 patients were included. The pooled response rate was 73% (95%CI: 68-78%), which was significantly higher than recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) (27.8%). The pooled survival rate was 66% (95%CI: 54-77%), and infection was found to be the main cause of death. In addition, the pooled rate of adverse events was 3% (95%CI: 1-7%), with no severe adverse events reported. TPO-RAs could effectively and safely promote the recovery of platelets in patients after HSCT.

Eltrombopag in the treatment of patients with persistent thrombocytopenia after haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a single-center experience

Persistent thrombocytopenia (PT) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is associated with an increased risk of bleeding and poor survival. The exact pathogenesis underlying PT remains unclear, and its management is difficult. Here we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag (EPAG) in 34 patients with PT after allo-HSCT. Seven patients suffered from prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT), and 27 had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). For most patients, the initial dose was 25 mg or 50 mg daily, then adjusted to the maximum dose of 50-100 mg per day according to the response of platelet recovery and toleration of patients. The cumulative incidence (CI) of platelet recovery to at least 20 × 10⁹/L and 50 × 10⁹/L without transfusion support for at least 7 days was 72.1% and 60.7%, respectively. Nineteen (86.4%) of 22 responders were able to taper off the medication; furthermore, the platelet counts remained stable 1 month after withdrawal of EPAG. Although two patients discontinued EPAG during treatment due to headache and nausea, no patients developed grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Hypoplasia of bone marrow and decreased megakaryocytes (MKs) were found to be risk factors for overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) in multivariate analysis, respectively. Overall, our results indicated that EPAG can be used in the treatment of PT and that continuous exposure to EPAG may not be necessary.

Poor survival and prediction of prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia post umbilical cord blood transplantation in patients with hematological malignancies

Prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT) is a common complication after umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). However, data on PIT prediction and impacts on transplantation outcomes for UCBT patients are rare. We retrospectively analyzed 244 patients with hematological malignancies who received single-unit UCBT at the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC between August 2018 and December 2019. Among them, PIT occurred in 49 recipients, with a crude incidence of 20.1%. In the PIT patients, the 2-year cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) was significantly higher, and the probabilities of 2-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-free relapse-free survival were significantly poorer (57.1% vs. 88.6%; 53.1% vs. 81.9%; 22.4% vs. 59.8%; p < 0.001), without remarkable increases in the cumulative incidence of relapse or chronic GVHD. Importantly, the multivariate analysis revealed that lower high-resolution HLA compatibility (≤6/10), lower infused CD34⁺ cell count (≤1.78 × 10⁵ /kg), grade II-IV acute GVHD preplatelet engraftment, a lower pretransplantation platelet count (≤100 × 10⁹ /L), and a longer neutrophil engraftment time (≥17 days) were independent risk factors for PIT after UCBT. These results demonstrate that PIT is common after UCBT, predicting inferior survival and the need for more monitoring during the early phase.

Off-Label Use of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists: Case Series and Review of the Literature

Since their license in 2008, studies on thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) are proceeding at a fast pace. Their favorable efficacy and safety profile makes them good candidates for the management of thrombocytopenia in different settings, even beyond their current indications. In the last 10 years, we faced patients with refractory thrombocytopenia that required treatment with off-label TPO-RA, despite the paucity of data in the literature and the possible risks, particularly that of thrombosis. We hereby report our 10-year real-life single-center experience of TPO-RA used off-label. Fourteen patients were divided into three groups according to the etiology of thrombocytopenia: myelodysplastic syndromes, post-transplantation, and lymphoproliferative diseases. Clinical features and results are reported within each group. Overall, TPO-RA proved effective in all these conditions achieving responses also in heavily pretreated patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was 100% in patients with thrombocytopenia after transplantation and in those with lymphoproliferative diseases and 75% in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. The median duration of therapy was 285 days (range 93–1,513 days). Four patients (29%) discontinued treatment because of lack of response (n=2) or a sustained response (n=2). No grade 3–4 adverse events occurred, particularly no thrombosis. In our real-life experience, TPO-RAs were effective and safe and proved of value in the challenging management of patients with refractory thrombocytopenia associated with different conditions.

Eltrombopag for treatment of thrombocytopenia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in children: Single-centre experience

Delayed recovery of thrombocytopenia is a well-known complication after allogeneic HSCT. Eltrombopag (ELT), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TRAs), induces platelet maturation and release. Mostly conducted in adults, some of the previous studies have shown that ELT seems to enhance platelet recovery for post-allogeneic HSCT thrombocytopenia, appears efficacious, and offers transfusion independence. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ELT in pediatric patients with prolonged isolated thrombocytopenia (PIT) or secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR) after alloHSCT. Retrospective analysis of childhood patients who received treatment with ELT for persistent thrombocytopenia after alloHSCT between May 2016 and August 2019. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ELT in 18 childhood patients with PIT or SFPR after alloHSCT. Eltrombopag (50 mg/d) treatment was started in all patients, above 6 years of age and 20 kg weight, who had thrombocytopenia despite neutrophil engraftment on the 30th day of HSCT. Our objective was to decrease the need for platelet transfusion and have a platelet count of more than 50 000/µL. The overall response rate was 77.7%. The median time to achieve a platelet level above 30 000/µL and 50 000/µL was 21 and 44 days, respectively. In four patients, platelet count never reached 30 000/mm³ . In two patients, the treatment was discontinued due to grade 3 hepatotoxicity. Our study supports the efficacy and relative safety of ELT use for the treatment of PIT and SFPR seen after alloHSCT in children.

Efficacy and cost analysis of eltrombopag in thrombocytopenia and poor graft function post allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Eltrombopag has shown efficacy in the treatment of thrombocytopenia and poor graft function (PGF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in retrospective observational studies, but is not approved for this indication. The cost of this drug is also a major concern in publicly funded health care systems. We collected data about patients who received eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia or PGF after HCT. Post-HCT thrombocytopenia, PGF, and eltrombopag response were defined as per previously published criteria. Primary outcome was treatment efficacy and secondary outcome was cost comparison between estimated treatment cost prior to and after initiation of eltrombopag. Seventeen patients (males 70.6%; median age = 58) received eltrombopag. Isolated thrombocytopenia was present in 11.8% (n = 2) patients while PGF was present in 88.2% (n = 15) of patients. After 8 weeks of treatment at the maximum dose of 150 mg orally daily, overall response rate (ORR) was seen in 76.5% (13/17) of patients: complete response (CR) in 10/13 patients and partial response (PR) in 3/13 patients. The use of eltrombopag was associated with an overall decrease in the total weekly care costs (5021 vs 2,524 CA$; P = 0.04). Thus, Eltrombopag is an efficacious and possibly cost-effective therapy for thrombocytopenia and PGF after allogeneic HCT.

Eltrombopag for the treatment of poor graft function following allogeneic stem cell transplant: a retrospective multicenter study

This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness of eltrombopag (EPAG), a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, in the treatment of poor graft function (PGF) following an allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Complete response was defined as normalization of blood counts, whereas partial response was defined as transfusion independence. A total of 48 patients with full donor chimerism after HSCT, received EPAG for a median of 120 days (range 10-591). Patients with uni- bi- or tri-lineage cytopenia started treatment at a median of 95 days (range 17-877) after HSCT. The overall response rate was 75%: 24 patients had a complete response and 12 had a partial response. Positive predictors of response were an HLA-matched donor, a CD34⁺ dose at transplant > 4 × 10⁶/kg, and starting EPAG treatment at least 90 days after HSCT. Patients with more than one positive predictor had a response rate of 92% for the overall patient cohort and 94% for patients with tri-lineage cytopenia. One-year survival was 89% for complete responders, 60% for partial responders and 20% for non-responders (p = 0.0004). EPAG improves peripheral blood counts in patients with poor graft function following HSCT. Response to EPAG can be predicted and has a significant impact on survival.

Eltrombopag-related renal vein thromboembolism in a patient with immune thrombocytopenia: A case report

BACKGROUND

Eltrombopag is an orally administered thrombopoietin receptor agonist linked to a heightened risk of treatment-related thromboembolism. Both venous and arterial thromboses have been documented in the medical literature.

CASE SUMMARY

In the absence of nephropathy, a 48-year-old patient receiving eltrombopag for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) developed renal vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The renal vein thrombus spontaneously resolved during subsequent anticoagulant treatment, restoring venous circulation.

CONCLUSION

A rapid upsurge in platelets, rather than their absolute number, may trigger thrombotic events in this setting. For patients at high thrombotic risk, individualized eltrombopag dosing and vigilance in platelet monitoring are perhaps needed during treatment of ITP.

Phase I Dose-Finding, Safety, and Tolerability Trial of Romiplostim to Improve Platelet Recovery After UCB Transplantation

Platelet recovery is delayed after umbilical cord blood transplant (UCBT). Romiplostim is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist that has the potential to improve platelet engraftment after UCBT. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of romiplostim and to investigate whether romiplostim accelerates platelet recovery post-UCBT. It was a single-center, dose-finding, safety and tolerability phase I trial of weekly romiplostim in 20 adult patients who failed to achieve an un-transfused platelet count of 20 × 10⁹/L by day +28 post-UCBT. Romiplostim was administered at the assigned dose as 6 weekly injections beginning by day +42 post-UCBT. Four dose levels (4, 6, 8, and 10 µg/kg per dose) were evaluated. The MTD of romiplostim was determined by the continual reassessment method, with a goal to identify a dose level with desired toxicity rate of ≤20%. Median age of the patients was 59.5 years, and 60% were female. Eleven patients received nonmyeloablative (NMA) double UCBT, seven patients received myeloablative single UCBT, and two patients received NMA single UCBT. Two patients received 4 µg/kg per dose, two received 6 µg/kg per dose, four received 8 µg/kg per dose, and the remaining 12 received 10 µg/kg per dose. Only five patients completed the full six doses of treatment. Of the 15 patients who received fewer than six doses, 12 were due to a platelet count of >100 × 10⁹/L, two were due to platelet count of >400 × 10⁹/L, and one was due to right upper extremity edema without thrombosis. All romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet engraftment to 20 × 10⁹/L at a median of 45 days post-UCBT compared to 90% of controls at a median of 45 days (P = .08). Similarly, 90% of romiplostim-treated patients achieved platelet engraftment to 50 × 10⁹/L at a median of 48 days compared to 75% of controls at a median of 52 days (P = .09). All dose levels were effective with low toxicity; therefore, the MTD of romiplostim was 10 µg/kg per dose, and romiplostim is a safe and potentially effective therapy to counter delayed platelet recovery post-UCBT.

Identification of Eltrombopag as a Repurposing Drug Against Staphylococcus epidermidis and its Biofilms

Staphylococcus epidermidis is a common cause of nosocomial infections, and readily adheres to medical apparatus to form biofilms consisting of highly resistant persister cells. Owing to the refractory infections caused by S. epidermidis biofilms and persisters in immunosuppressed patients, it is crucial to develop new antimicrobials. In the present study, we analyzed the antimicrobial effects of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag (EP) against S. epidermidis planktonic cells, biofilms, and persister cells. EP was significantly toxic to S. epidermidis with the minimal inhibitory concentration of 8 μg/ml, and effectively inhibited the biofilms and persisters in a strain-dependent manner. In addition, EP was only mildly toxic to mammalian cells after 12 to 24 h treatment. It also partially synergized with vancomycin against S. epidermidis, which enhanced its antimicrobial effects and reduced its toxicity to mammalian cells. Taken together, EP is a potential antibiotic for treating refractory infections caused by S. epidermidis.

Impaired Hematopoiesis after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Its Pathogenesis and Potential Treatments

Impaired hematopoiesis is a serious complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Bone marrow aplasia and peripheral cytopenias arise from primary and secondary graft failure or primary and secondary poor graft function. Chimerism analysis is useful to discriminate these conditions. By determining the pathogenesis of impaired hematopoiesis, a timely and appropriate treatment can be performed. Hematopoietic system principally consists of hematopoietic stem cells and bone marrow microenvironment termed niches. Abnormality in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and/or abnormality in the relevant niches give rise to hematological diseases. Allo-HSCT is intended to cure each hematological disease, replacing abnormal hematopoietic stem cells and bone marrow niches with hematopoietic stem cells and bone marrow niches derived from normal donors. Therefore, treatment for graft failure and poor graft function after allo-HSCT is required to proceed based on determining the pathogenesis of impaired hematopoiesis. Recent progress in this area suggests promising treatment manipulations for graft failure and poor graft function.

Eltrombopag as first-line treatment for thrombocytopenia among paediatric patients after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of eltrombopag as first-line treatment for thrombocytopenia among paediatric patients after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

METHODS

Forty-three childhood patients with thrombocytopenia after HSCT who received eltrombopag were retrospectively analysed.

RESULT

Eltrombopag was began at the median of 27 days after HSCT and lasted for 24 days. Thirty-five children responded to eltrombopag therapy, and the cumulative platelet recovery rate was 88.9%. The cumulative incidence of platelet recovery was lower (83.9 vs 100%; P = .035) in patients with decreased numbers of megakaryocytes before starting eltrombopag than in those with normal. Factors associated with a significantly elevated response to eltrobopag from univariate analysis were donor type. Results from the multiple regression analysis found that weight (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.9, P = .022), platelet engraftment time (HR = 1.0, 95%CI 1.0-1.0, P = .012) and bone marrow megakaryocytes (HR = 8.0, 95%CI 1.5-43.3, P = .016) before starting eltrombopag were the independent risk factors. Based on Youden's index algorithm in the receiver-operating characteristic curve, the optimal cut-off value of the maintenance dose of eltrombopag in predicting nonresponders was 4 mg/kg. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.923 with sensitivity of 97.8%, specificity of 87.9%, positive predictive value of 72.3%, and negative predictive value of 92%. None of the paediatric patients stopped using eltrombopag due to side effect or intolerability.

CONCLUSION

Eltrombopag is effective and safe in paediatric patients with thrombocytopenia after HSCT. The number of megakaryocytes in bone marrow before eltrombopag treatment may serve as a predictor of the response to eltrombopag. We recommend that the maintenance dose of eltrombopag should not exceed 4 mg/kg/d.

Rescue treatment with eltrombopag in refractory cytopenias after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Background:

Patients with post-transplant cytopenias due to poor graft function or primary engraftment failure show poor prognosis with a high mortality rate mainly because of graft versus host disease (GVHD), infection and/or bleeding. Treatment options are scarce and a CD34+ stem cell boost or a second bone marrow transplantation may be required to restore adequate haematopoiesis.

Methods:

In the present study patients with primary engraftment failure (n = 1) and refractory poor graft function (n = 11) were treated with eltrombopag in a single centre. The reason for eltrombopag treatment was trilineage cytopenia in six patients, bilineage cytopenia in three patients and single lineage cytopenia in three patients. Eltrombopag was initiated at a median of 214 (range: 120–877) days after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCST) and administered for a median time of 114 (range: 12 days to >490) days. In 8/12 patients eltrombopag was introduced at a dose of 75 mg/day and then increased to 150 mg/day after 1 week; 1 patient was given 50 mg eltrombopag per day, and 3 patients received 75 mg daily.

Results:

In 10/12 patients eltrombopag significantly enhanced blood count values and patients became transfusion independent. Once stable haematological response was obtained, treatment was tapered until final discontinuation in 9/10 responding patients. No grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. At time of last follow up, 3/12 patients were dead, 2 due to disease relapse, 1 due to GVHD and pneumonia. All patients except one maintained their complete response and remain transfusion independent at a median of 858 (range: 429–1119) days.

Conclusion:

These preliminary data confirm that eltrombopag is able to rescue multilineage haematopoiesis in patients with treatment-refractory cytopenias after allogeneic HSCT.

Advances in the understanding of poor graft function following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation

Poor graft function (PGF) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-threatening complication and is characterized by bilineage or trilineage blood cell deficiency and hypoplastic marrow with full chimerism. With the rapid development of allo-HSCT, especially haploidentical-HSCT, PGF has become a growing concern. The most common risk factors illustrated by recent studies include low dose of infused CD34+ cells, donor-specific antibody, cytomegalovirus infection, graft versus host disease (GVHD), iron overload and splenomegaly, among others. Because of the poor prognosis of PGF, it is crucial to uncover the underlying mechanism, which remains elusive. Recent studies have suggested that the bone marrow microenvironment may play an important role in the pathogenesis of PGF. Deficiency and dysfunction of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells, elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, and immune abnormalities are believed to contribute to PGF. In this review, we also discuss recent clinical trials that evaluate the safety and efficacy of new strategies in patients with PGF. CD34+-selected stem-cell boost (SCB) is effective with an acceptable incidence of GVHD, despite the need for a second donation. Alternative strategies including the applications of mesenchymal stem cells, N-acetyl-l-cysteine (NAC), and eltrombopag have shown favorable outcomes, but further large-scale studies are needed due to the small sample sizes of the recent clinical trials.

Evaluation of eltrombopag in thrombocytopenia post Hematopoietic cell transplantation: Rertrospective observational trial

BACKGROUND

Thrombocytopenia remains a life-threatening late complication of HCT with an incidence of 5-20%. Currently, there is no approved drug for the treatment of persistent thrombocytopenia post HCT and platelet transfusion is the maintain stay of treatment. Eltrombopag is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with different diseases, however; data on eltrombopag treatment post HCT are limited.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating the effect of eltrombopag on platelet recovery in patients with persistent thrombocytopenia post HCT. The primary endpoint was platelet recovery to ≥ 20,000/μL for 7 consecutive days without transfusion support after starting eltrombopag. Secondary endpoint was platelet recovery to ≥ 50,000/μL for 7 consecutive days.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. Twelve (75%) of 16 patients became independent from platelet transfusions. Median time from starting eltrombopag to last transfusion was 60 days (range, 9-226 days). Ten (63%) of 16 transfusion dependent patients with platelet count < 20,000/μL achieved the primary endpoint. Seven (33%) patients of 21 included had successful platelet recovery (ie, ≥50,000/μL without transfusion support) and the median time to platelet recovery in patients who achieved it was 32 days (range, 13-265 days). Ten patients (48%) were able to successfully discontinue eltrombopag without recurrence of thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that eltrombopag appears to have a clinically significant impact on platelet recovery in persistent thrombocytopenic patients post HCT.

Eltrombopag treatment promotes platelet recovery and reduces platelet transfusion for patients with post-transplantation thrombocytopenia

Post-transplantation thrombocytopenia (PT) is a common and severe complication which usually leads to poor prognosis. Eltrombopag (EPAG), a novel oral thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist, has shown promising effects in thrombocytopenia due to immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) and refractory severe aplastic anemia (rSAA), while the effectiveness of EPAG for PT patients still needs to be evaluated. A total of 32 PT patients receiving EPAG were retrospectively analyzed between September 2017 and July 2019, including 15 patients with poor graft function (PGF) and 17 patients with secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). To date, 21 (65.6%) patients achieved overall recovery (OR) and 14 (43.8%) patients achieved complete recovery (CR). Among responders, 18 (85.7%) patients discontinued or tapered the drug and 16 (76.2%) patients successfully maintained their best response. During the EPAG treatment, responders received much lower median platelet transfusion units than non-responders (11 vs. 95, P < 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 364 days (range, 24-842), the overall survival in these patients was 78.1% (100% for responders and 36.4% for non-responders, P < 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analysis, PGF was identified as the independent risk factor for OR (P = 0.041, HR = 5.333). Megakaryocyte (Megk) amounts (P = 0.025, HR = 14.638) and splenomegaly (P = 0.042, HR = 11.278) were identified as independent risk factors for CR. Besides, PGF patients tended to take a longer time to achieve PR and CR than SFPR patients. In conclusion, our data suggest that EPAG can promote platelet recovery and reduce platelet transfusion in PT patients.

Eltrombopag: Role in Cytopenias Following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Eltrombopag is a small molecule oral agonist of the thrombopoietin receptor. Initially used for improving thrombocytopenia in chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), it was later found to be efficacious in various other etiologies of thrombocytopenia as well as inherited marrow failure syndromes. Lately, it has been used for thrombocytopenia and poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) without any severe adverse events. Although prospective evidence of the efficacy is limited, there are increasing reports on the safety and efficacy with Eltrombopag in post HSCT thrombocytopenia and poor graft function. This provides an exciting opportunity for further research to evaluate both efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the use of Eltrombopag in this scenario. Here we review the current evidence on the indications for the use of Eltrombopag in the post allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting.

The Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonist Eltrombopag Inhibits Human Cytomegalovirus Replication Via Iron Chelation

The thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag was successfully used against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-associated thrombocytopenia refractory to immunomodulatory and antiviral drugs. These effects were ascribed to the effects of eltrombopag on megakaryocytes. Here, we tested whether eltrombopag may also exert direct antiviral effects. Therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations inhibited HCMV replication in human fibroblasts and adult mesenchymal stem cells infected with six different virus strains and drug-resistant clinical isolates. Eltrombopag also synergistically increased the anti-HCMV activity of the mainstay drug ganciclovir. Time-of-addition experiments suggested that eltrombopag interfered with HCMV replication after virus entry. Eltrombopag was effective in thrombopoietin receptor-negative cells, and the addition of Fe³⁺ prevented the anti-HCMV effects, indicating that it inhibits HCMV replication via iron chelation. This may be of particular interest for the treatment of cytopenias after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, as HCMV reactivation is a major reason for transplantation failure. Since therapeutic eltrombopag concentrations are effective against drug-resistant viruses, and synergistically increase the effects of ganciclovir, eltrombopag is also a drug-repurposing candidate for the treatment of therapy-refractory HCMV disease.

Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Primed Unmanipulated Haploidentical Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), a growth factor for neutrophils, has been successfully used for stem cell mobilization and T cell immune tolerance induction. The establishment of G-CSF-primed unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation (The Beijing Protocol) has achieved outcomes for the treatment of acute leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and severe aplastic anemia with haploidentical allografts comparable to those of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor transplantation. Currently, G-CSF-mobilized bone marrow and/or peripheral blood stem cell sources have been widely used in unmanipulated haploidentical transplant settings. In this review, we summarize the roles of G-CSF in inducing T cell immune tolerance. We discuss the recent advances in the Beijing Protocol, mainly focusing on strategies that have been used to improve transplant outcomes in cases of poor graft function, virus infections, and relapse. The application of G-CSF-primed allografts in other haploidentical modalities is also discussed.

Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists for Severe Thrombocytopenia after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Persistent thrombocytopenia is a common complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Romiplostim and eltrombopag are the currently available thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), and some studies with very small numbers of cases have reported their potential efficacy in the allo-SCT setting. The present retrospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of TPO-RAs in 86 patients with persistent thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT. Sixteen patients (19%) had isolated thrombocytopenia (PT), and 71 (82%) had secondary failure of platelet recovery (SFPR). TPO-RA therapy was started at a median of 127 days (range, 27 to 1177 days) after allo-SCT. The median initial and maximum administered doses were 50 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/day) and 75 mg/day (range, 25 to 150 mg/day), respectively, for eltrombopag and 1 µg/kg (range, 1 to 7 µg/kg) and 5 µg/kg (range, 1 to 10 µg/kg), respectively, for romiplostin. The median platelet count before initiation of TPO-RA therapy was 14,000/µL (range, 1000 to 57,000/µL). Platelet recovery to ≥50,000/µL without transfusion support was achieved in 72% of patients at a median time of 66 days (range, 2 to 247 days). Eighty-one percent of the patients had a decreased number of megakaryocytes before treatment, showing a slower response to therapy (P = .011). The median duration of treatment was 62 days (range, 7 to 700 days). Grade 3-4 adverse events (hepatic and asthenia) were observed in only 2% of the patients. At last follow-up, 81% of patients had discontinued TPO-RAs and maintained response, and 71% were alive. To our knowledge, this is the largest series analyzing the use of TPO-RAs after allo-SCT reported to date. Our results support the efficacy and safety in this new setting. Further prospective trials are needed to increase the level of evidence and to identify predictors of response.