Cost-effectiveness analysis of allogeneic versus autologous stem cell transplant versus chemo-immunotherapy for early relapse of follicular lymphoma within 2 years of initial therapy

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Cost Associated with Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Scoping Review

This scoping review summarizes the evidence regarding healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This study was conducted in accordance with the Joanne Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The PubMed, Embase, and Health Business Elite Electronic databases were searched, in addition to grey literature. The databases were searched from inception up to November 2022. Studies that reported HRU and/or costs associated with adult (≥18 years) allo-HSCT were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened 20% of the sample at each of the 2 stages of screening (abstract and full text). Details of the HRU and costs extracted from the study data were summarized, based on the elements and timeframes reported. HRU measures and costs were combined across studies reporting results defined in a comparable manner. Monetary values were standardized to 2022 US Dollars (USD). We identified 43 studies that reported HRU, costs, or both for allo-HSCT. Of these studies, 93.0% reported on costs, 81.4% reported on HRU, and 74.4% reported on both. HRU measures and cost calculations, including the timeframe for which they were reported, were heterogeneous across the studies. Length of hospital stay was the most frequently reported HRU measure (76.7% of studies) and ranged from a median initial hospitalization of 10 days (reduced-intensity conditioning [RIC]) to 73 days (myeloablative conditioning). The total cost of an allo-HSCT ranged from $63,096 (RIC) to $782,190 (double umbilical cord blood transplantation) at 100 days and from $69,218 (RIC) to $637,193 at 1 year (not stratified). There is heterogeneity in the reporting of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT in the literature, making it difficult for clinicians, policymakers, and governments to draw definitive conclusions regarding the resources required for the delivery of these services. Nevertheless, to ensure that access to healthcare meets the necessary high cost and resource demands of allo-HSCT, it is imperative for clinicians, policymakers, and government officials to be aware of both the short- and long-term health resource requirements for this patient population. Further research is needed to understand the key determinants of HRU and costs associated with allo-HSCT to better inform the design and delivery of health care for HSCT recipients and ensure the quality, safety, and efficiency of care.

Age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio as prognostic factors for autologous transplantation in the treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent, lymphoproliferative disease of B-cell origin that has a heterogeneous disease course with varying outcomes. Certain patients may undergo autologous stem cell transplantation. We investigated the outcome of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with FL.

METHODS

Patients who received autologous stem cell transplantation at the University of Debrecen's Department of Hematology between 2004 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after transplantation of patients with FL were examined. Prognostic factors that may influence the course of the disease were chosen.

RESULTS

Data were collected from 49 patients. OS was influenced only by age, whereas PFS was affected by age and the lymphocyte/monocyte ratio. The combination of age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio defined a patient population with a particularly unfavorable prognostic risk profile: patients over 47 years of age with a pre-transplant lymphocyte/monocyte ratio greater than or equal to 2.675.

CONCLUSION

Age and lymphocyte/monocyte ratio were identified as useful prognostic factors for PFS in patients with FL following autologous stem cell transplantation.

Ibrutinib Plus RCHOP versus RCHOP Only in Young Patients with Activated B-Cell-like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL): A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

The standard treatment for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP). However, many patients require subsequent treatment after relapsed disease. The ABC subtype of DLBCL (ABC-DLBCL) has a worse prognosis, and the PHOENIX trial explored adding ibrutinib to RCHOP for this patient population. The trial showed favorable outcomes for younger patients, and our study aimed to inform clinical decision-making via a cost-effectiveness model to compare RCHOP with and without ibrutinib (I-RCHOP). A Markov decision analysis model was designed to compare the treatments for patients younger than 60 years with ABC-DLBCL. The model considered treatment pathways, adverse events, relapses, and death, incorporating data on salvage treatments and novel therapies. The results indicated that I-RCHOP was more cost-effective, with greater quality-adjusted life years (QALY, 15.48 years vs. 14.25 years) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 34,111.45/QALY compared to RCHOP only. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the model's robustness. Considering the high market price for ibrutinib, I-RCHOP may be more costly. However, it is suggested as the preferred cost-effective strategy for younger patients due to its benefits in adverse events, overall survival, and quality of life. The decision analytic model provided relevant and robust results to inform clinical decision-making.

Cost-Effectiveness of Unrelated Umbilical Cord Blood vs. HLA Haploidentical Related Bone Marrow Transplant: Evidence from BMT CTN 1101

BACKGROUND

BMT CTN 1101 was a Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing reduced intensity conditioning followed by double unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) versus HLA-haploidentical related donor bone marrow (haplo-BM) transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to report the results of a parallel cost-effectiveness analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Three hundred sixty-eight patients were randomized to unrelated UCB (n=186) or haplo-BM (n=182) transplant. We estimated healthcare utilization and costs using propensity score-matched BMT patients from the OptumLabs^Ⓡ Data Warehouse for trial participants <65 years and Medicare claims for participants ≥65 years. Weibull models were used to estimate 20-year survival. EQ-5D surveys by trial participants were used estimate Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs).

RESULTS

At 5-year follow-up, survival was 42% for haplo-BM versus 36% for UCB (P=.06). Over a 20-year time horizon, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective (+0.63 QALY) and more costly +$118,953) for persons under 65. For those over 65, haplo-BM is expected to be more effective and less costly. In one-way uncertainty analyses, for persons <65, the cost per QALY result was most sensitive to life years and health state utilities. For persons ≥65, life years were more influential than costs and health state utilities.

CONCLUSION

Compared to UCB, haplo-BM was moderately cost-effective for patients aged <65 years, and less costly and more effective for persons ≥65 years. Haplo-BM is a fair value choice for commercially insured patients with high-risk leukemia and lymphoma who require HCT. For Medicare enrollees, haplo-BM is a preferred choice when considering costs and outcomes.

Long-term follow-up demonstrates curative potential of autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed follicular lymphoma

Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can achieve durable responses in eligible patients with follicular lymphoma (FL), long-term follow-up is needed to determine if it has curative potential. This retrospective, multicenter study included 162 patients who received ASCT for relapsed FL in Alberta, Canada. With a median (range) follow-up time of 12.5 years (0.1-27.9), the 12-year time-to-progression (TTP) was 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 49%-65%), time-to-next-treatment was 61% (95% CI 52%-69%), progression-free survival was 51% (95% CI 42%-59%) and overall survival was 69% (95% CI 60%-76%). A plateau emerged on the TTP curve at 57% starting 9 years after ASCT with no relapses occurring beyond this timepoint. Ten patients remained in remission 20 years or more after ASCT. Patients undergoing ASCT at first or second relapse had superior outcomes compared to third or later relapse (12-year TTP 61% vs. 34%), as did patients without progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) of frontline treatment versus those with POD24 (12-year TTP 67% vs. 50%). ASCT achieves high rates of durable remission in relapsed FL, with long-term follow-up revealing that more than 50% of transplanted patients may be functionally cured of their lymphoma. The optimal timing to consider ASCT is at first or second relapse, regardless of POD24 status.