Anthracycline-containing regimens or taxane versus S-1 as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

Advances in monotherapy and combination therapy of S-1 for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Both domestically and worldwide, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain the leading cause of cancer-related death. As a fluorouracil derivative, S-1 which shows good efficacy and with few adverse effects have been widely confirmed in many solid tumors that it can provide a glimmer of hope for advanced NSCLC patients. We performed a review to explore the results of previous clinical studies of S-1 monotherapy as well as combined therapy involving S-1 in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in Medline and PubMed databases using the keywords "S-1" AND "Advanced lung cancer" OR "Pharmacological mechanism".

Key Content and Findings

A number of phase II clinical studies have reported on the favorable efficacy and excellent safety profiles of S-1 monotherapy in first-line or in posterior-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. In regard to S-1 in combination with chemotherapy, a number of phase II/III clinical studies have found the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of these regimens are similar to or better than immunological monotherapy with fewer adverse effects. In the case of S-1 combined with anti-vascular therapy, a number of phase II single-arm clinical studies have found that S-1 combined with bevacizumab, anlotinib and apatinib in advanced NSCLC, exhibits higher antitumor activity, less adverse effects for patients with advanced NSCLC. A phase II single-arm clinical study of gefitinib combined with S-1 had the ORR of 85.7% in the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. As for the combination of S-1 and immunotherapy, preliminary results of a phase II retrospective clinical trial demonstrated that the ORR was significantly better with S-1 sequential after immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) than with S-1 alone.

Conclusions

The findings indicate promising effectiveness and minimal toxicity with S-1 monotherapy and S-1 containing combined therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC to provide a potential treatment option for advanced NSCLC.

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer, 2022 edition

The Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) Clinical Practice Guidelines for systemic treatment of breast cancer were updated to the 2022 edition through a process started in 2018. The updated guidelines consist of 12 background questions (BQs), 33 clinical questions (CQs), and 20 future research questions (FRQs). Multiple outcomes including efficacy and safety were selected in each CQ, and then quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews were conducted to determine the strength of evidence and strength of recommendation, which was finally determined through a voting process among designated committee members. Here, we describe eight selected CQs as important updates from the previous guidelines, including novel practice-changing updates, and recommendations based on evidence that has emerged specifically from Japanese clinical trials.

The Potential Role of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG) in Breast Cancer Treatment

Breast cancer is one of the most diagnosed cancers worldwide, with an incidence of 47.8%. Its treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and antibodies giving a mortality of 13.6%. Breast tumor development is driven by a variety of signaling pathways with high heterogeneity of surface receptors, which makes treatment difficult. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) is a natural polyphenol isolated as the main component in green tea; it has shown multiple beneficial effects in breast cancer, controlling proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, inflammation, and demethylation of DNA. These properties were proved in vitro and in vivo together with synergistic effects in combination with traditional chemotherapy, increasing the effectiveness of the treatment. This review focuses on the effects of EGCG on the functional capabilities acquired by breast tumor cells during its multistep development, the molecular and signal pathways involved, the synergistic effects in combination with current drugs, and how nanomaterials can improve its bioavailability on breast cancer treatment.

Docetaxel plus S-1 versus docetaxel plus capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer patients: a prospective randomized phase II study

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/S-1 (TS) compared with docetaxel/capecitabine (TX) as a first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer were randomly divided into the TS group (n = 54) and the TX group (n = 57) for first-line chemotherapy from August 2015 to April 2019 (ClinicalTrials.org registration no. NCT02947061). Following the completion of combination therapy, patients without progression received S-1 or capecitabine maintenance treatment. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Among 111 enrolled patients, the median PFS did not differ significantly between the TS group and the TX group (TS vs. TX, 9.0 vs. 7.4 months, P = 0.365, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-1.11, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75). There was also no statistically significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between the two groups (TS vs. TX, 40.2 vs. 41.3 months, P = 0.976). In addition, visceral metastasis and metastasis sites, such as the liver or lung, did not lead to a significant effect on PFS and OS. The two regimens showed no significant difference in adverse events, except hand-foot syndrome, which predominated in the TX group (38.6% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (24.1% vs. 3.6%, P = 0.003) and elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (14.8% vs. 3.5%, P = 0.049), which were more frequent in the TS group.

Conclusions

The TS and TX regimens demonstrated similar efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer. The TS regimen had fewer cases of severe hand-foot syndrome than the TX regimen, representing an effective alternative option to the TX regimen. Further studies are warranted to define the efficacy and safety of this strategy in real-world settings.

The beneficial role of exercise in preventing doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity

Doxorubicin is a highly effective chemotherapeutic agent widely used to treat a variety of cancers. However, the clinical application of doxorubicin is limited due to its adverse effects on several tissues. One of the most serious side effects of doxorubicin is cardiotoxicity, which results in life-threatening heart damage, leading to reduced cancer treatment success and survival rate. Doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity results from cellular toxicity, including increased oxidative stress, apoptosis, and activated proteolytic systems. Exercise training has emerged as a non-pharmacological intervention to prevent cardiotoxicity during and after chemotherapy. Exercise training stimulates numerous physiological adaptations in the heart that promote cardioprotective effects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for exercise-induced cardioprotection is important to develop therapeutic approaches for cancer patients and survivors. In this report, we review the cardiotoxic effects of doxorubicin and discuss the current understanding of exercise-induced cardioprotection in hearts from doxorubicin-treated animals.

Association of change in health-related quality of life and treatment discontinuation in metastatic breast cancer: a post hoc, exploratory analysis of two randomized clinical trials

Purpose

Identifying factors associated with treatment alteration (treatment discontinuation and dose reduction) may help to attain the treatment goals for metastatic breast cancer. The value of changes in the quality of life (QOL) in predicting treatment alteration remained unclear. This study aimed to examine the relationship between changes in the QOL and treatment alteration of first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

We merged data from two randomized clinical trials in Japan, conducted from 2006 to 2017, that included patients who were diagnosed with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative and endocrine treatment-resistant breast cancer, with metastatic disease at presentation or recurrence after surgery. The European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 was used to assess QOL. The association between change in time-dependent QOL (worsening by 10-point or not) and time to treatment alteration was assessed using the Cox regression models controlling for patient characteristics (age, liver metastasis, hormone status, and treatment regimen) and baseline QOL.

Results

Worsening physical functioning, global health status, and dyspnea were significantly associated with treatment discontinuation. Worsening role functioning, global health status, and fatigue were significantly associated with dose reduction. The threshold for defining worsening did not have a significant impact on the relationship.

Conclusion

Changes in QOL are associated with the probability of treatment alteration among metastatic breast cancer patients. Physical functioning, role functioning, global health status, dyspnea, and fatigue should be prioritized for symptom management in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07283-0.

Effectiveness of eribulin as first-line or second-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative hormone-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer: findings from the multi-institutional, prospective, observational KBCRN A001: E-SPEC study

BACKGROUND

The optimal positioning of eribulin treatment remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of eribulin administration as first- and second-line chemotherapy in patients with endocrine-resistant advanced or metastatic breast cancer (AMBC) in the real-world clinical setting.

METHODS

This multi-institutional prospective cohort study enrolled patients with triple-negative AMBC or estrogen receptor-positive AMBC refractory to at least one previous endocrine therapy. The overall survival (OS) from the start of first-line (OS1) and second-line chemotherapy (OS2) was assessed. Data analysis included real-world chemotherapy sequences of first- to third-line chemotherapy regimens. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for treatment regimen comparison was calculated using a stratified proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Among 201 patients enrolled, 180 were included in the final analysis. Eribulin was administered as first- and second-line chemotherapy to 46 (26.6%) and 70 (47.9%) patients, respectively. Median OS1 and OS2 were 2.25 (95% CI 1.07-2.68) and 1.75 (95% CI, 1.28-2.45) years for first- and second-line eribulin, respectively. Oral 5-FU followed by eribulin had a numerically longer OS1 (2.84 years) than the other sequences. Among patients who proceeded to second-line or later chemotherapy, the median OS1 for those treated with anthracycline or taxane as first- or second-line (n = 98) was 2.56 years (95% CI 2.27-2.74), while it was 2.87 years (95% CI 2.20-4.32) for those who avoided anthracycline and taxane as first- and second-line (n = 48) (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI 0.70-2.06). In the exploratory analysis, OS1 was 2.55 (95% CI 2.14-2.75) and 2.91 years (95% CI 2.61-4.32) for those aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years, respectively (adjusted HR of ≥ 65, 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Eribulin or oral 5-FU administration in first- and second-line chemotherapy without anthracycline/taxane was acceptable in the real-world setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered with Clinical Trials.gov (NCT 02,551,263).

Minimal important differences of EORTC QLQ-C30 for metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from a randomized clinical trial

Purpose

To establish minimal important differences (MIDs) for the European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Methods

The dataset was obtained from the SELECT BC-CONFIRM randomized clinical trial. Anchors obtained from patients (transition items) and clinicians (performance status) were used for anchor-based methods. Anchors obtained through 6 months after starting treatment were used for this analysis. Correlation coefficients of anchor and change in QLQ-C30 and effect size were used to qualify for estimating MIDs. Mean change method and generalized estimating equation were applied to estimate MIDs. Distribution-based methods were used for comparison.

Results

We analyzed a dataset of 154 metastatic breast cancer patients. MIDs were estimated in 8 of 15 scales of QLQ-C30. Estimated MIDs for within-group improvement varied from 7 to 15 and those for deterioration varied from − 7 to − 17. Estimated MIDs for between-group improvement varied from 5 to 11 and those for deterioration varied from − 5 to − 8 across QLQ-C30 scales. Patient-reported anchors were more susceptible to early changes in health status than clinician-reported anchors.

Conclusion

We provided the MIDs of the QLQ-C30 using both patient- and clinicians-reported anchors measured in a randomized trial of Japanese patients with metastatic breast cancer. We recommend patient-reported anchors for anchor-based estimation of MID. Our results can aid patients and clinicians, as well as researchers, in the interpretation of QLQ-C30.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03074-y.