NTRK1 Fusions identified by non-invasive plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) across 9 cancer types

Zurletrectinib is a next-generation TRK inhibitor with strong intracranial activity against NTRK fusion-positive tumours with on-target resistance to first-generation agents

BACKGROUND

While NTRK fusion-positive cancers can be exquisitely sensitive to first-generation TRK inhibitors, resistance inevitably occurs, mediated in many cases by acquired NTRK mutations. Next-generation inhibitors (e.g., selitrectinib, repotrectinib) maintain activity against these TRK mutant tumors; however, there are no next-generation TRK inhibitors approved by the FDA and select trials have stopped treating patients. Thus, the identification of novel, potent and specific next-generation TRK inhibitors is a high priority.

METHODS

In silico modeling and in vitro kinase assays were performed on TRK wild type (WT) and TRK mutant kinases. Cell viability and clonogenic assays as well as western blots were performed on human primary and murine engineered NTRK fusion-positive TRK WT and mutant cell models. Finally, zurletrectinib was tested in vivo in human xenografts and murine orthotopic glioma models harboring TRK-resistant mutations.

RESULTS

In vitro kinase and in cell-based assays showed that zurletrectinib, while displaying similar potency against TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC WT kinases, was more active than other FDA approved or clinically tested 1st- (larotrectinib) and next-generation (selitrectinib and repotrectinib) TRK inhibitors against most TRK inhibitor resistance mutations (13 out of 18). Similarly, zurletrectinib inhibited tumor growth in vivo in sub-cute xenograft models derived from NTRK fusion-positive cells at a dose 30 times lower when compared to selitrectinib. Computational modeling suggests this stronger activity to be the consequence of augmented binding affinity of zurletrectinib for TRK kinases. When compared to selitrectinib and repotrectinib, zurletrectinib showed increased brain penetration in rats 0.5 and 2 h following a single oral administration. Consistently, zurletrectinib significantly improved the survival of mice harboring orthotopic NTRK fusion-positive, TRK-mutant gliomas (median survival = 41.5, 66.5, and 104 days for selitrectinib, repotrectinib, and zurletrectinib respectively; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data identifies zurletrectinib as a novel, highly potent next-generation TRK inhibitor with stronger in vivo brain penetration and intracranial activity than other next-generation agents.

Promise and Perils of Precision Oncology for Patients With Pediatric and Young Adult Sarcomas

The completion of multiple national pediatric precision oncology platform trials and the incorporation of standardized molecular profiling into the diagnostic care of pediatric and young adult patients with sarcomas have proven the feasibility and potential of the approach. In this work, we explore the current state of the art of precision oncology for pediatric and young adults with sarcoma. We highlight important lessons learned and the challenges that should be addressed in the next generation of trials. The chapter outlines current efforts to improve standardization of molecular assays, harmonization of data collection, and novel molecular tools such as cell-free DNA analyses. Finally, we discuss the impacts and psychosocial outcomes experienced by patients and communication strategies for providers.

Serial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in ROS1 Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers During Treatment With Entrectinib

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are effectively treated with entrectinib, a multikinase inhibitor. Whether serial targeted gene panel sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) can identify response and progression along with mechanisms of acquired resistance to entrectinib is underexplored.

METHODS

In patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC, coclinical trial plasma samples were collected before treatment, after two cycles, and after progression on entrectinib (global phase II clinical trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02568267). Samples underwent cfDNA analysis using MSK-ACCESS. Variant allele frequencies of detectable alterations were correlated with objective response per RECIST v1.1 criteria.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included, with best response as partial response (n = 9, 75%), stable disease (n = 2, 17%), and progressive disease (PD; n = 1, 8%). A ROS1 fusion was variably detected in cfDNA; however, patients without a ROS1 fusion in cfDNA had no other somatic alterations detected, indicative of possible low cfDNA shedding. Clearance of the enrolling ROS1 fusion or concurrent non-ROS1 alterations (TP53, CDH1, NF1, or ARID1A mutations) was observed in response to entrectinib therapy. Radiologic PD was accompanied by redemonstration of a ROS1 fusion or non-ROS1 alterations. On-target resistance was rare; only one patient acquired ROS1 G2032R at the time of progression. Several patients acquired new off-target likely oncogenic alterations, including a truncating alteration in NF1.

CONCLUSION

Serial cfDNA monitoring may complement radiographic assessments as determinants of response and resistance to entrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancers in addition to detecting putative resistance mechanisms on progression.

NTRK gene fusion testing and management in lung cancer

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are recurrent oncogenic drivers found in a variety of solid tumours, including lung cancer. Several tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors have been developed to treat tumours with NTRK gene fusions. Larotrectinib and entrectinib are first-generation TRK inhibitors that have demonstrated efficacy in patients with TRK fusion lung cancers. Genomic testing is recommended for all patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer for optimal drug therapy selection. Multiple testing methods can be employed to identify NTRK gene fusions in the clinic and each has its own advantages and limitations. Among these assays, RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be considered a gold standard for detecting NTRK gene fusions; however, several alternatives with minimally acceptable sensitivity and specificity are also available in areas where widespread access to NGS is unfeasible. This review highlights the importance of testing for NTRK gene fusions in lung cancer, ideally using the gold-standard method of RNA-based NGS, the various assays that are available, and treatment algorithms for patients.

NTRK3-Rearranged Prostatic Acinar Adenocarcinoma: Report of a Patient and Review of the Literature

Molecular investigations have led to increased therapeutic options for prostatic adenocarcinoma. A single case report of a PRPSAP1::NTRK3 gene fusion occurring in prostate cancer was previously reported. A review of the literature revealed that NTRK gene rearrangements are exceedingly rare molecular events in prostate cancer. NTRK gene fusions can be oncogenic drivers or develop as resistance mechanisms. The tumor-agnostic approvals of TRK inhibitors by the FDA provide additional rationale for molecular investigations of aggressive prostatic adenocarcinomas. This may prove to be an additional therapeutic option for patients with aggressive prostatic carcinomas refractory to initial therapy. We report a case of an aggressive castrate-resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma with a BMP6::NTRK3 gene fusion.

Opportunity in Complexity: Harnessing Molecular Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsies for Personalized Sarcoma Care

Due to their rarity and complexity, sarcomas represent a substantial therapeutic challenge. However, the incredible diversity within and across sarcoma subtypes presents an opportunity for personalized care to maximize efficacy and limit toxicity. A deeper understanding of the molecular alterations that drive sarcoma development and treatment response has paved the way for molecular biomarkers to shape sarcoma treatment. Genetic, transcriptomic, and protein biomarkers have become critical tools for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection in patients with sarcomas. In the future, emerging biomarkers like circulating tumor DNA analysis offer the potential to improve early detection, monitoring response to treatment, and identifying mechanisms of resistance to personalize sarcoma treatment. Here, we review the current state of molecular biomarkers for sarcomas and highlight opportunities and challenges for the implementation of new technologies in the future.

Circulating tumor DNA validity and potential uses in metastatic breast cancer

Following the first characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the 1990s, recent advances led to its introduction in the clinics. At present, the European Society Of Medical Oncology (ESMO) recommendations endorse ctDNA testing in routine clinical practice for tumor genotyping to direct molecularly targeted therapies in patients with metastatic cancer. In studies on metastatic breast cancer, ctDNA has been utilized for treatment tailoring, tracking mechanisms of drug resistance, and for predicting disease response before imaging. We review the available evidence regarding ctDNA applications in metastatic breast cancer.

Molecular Basis of Tumorigenesis of Bladder Cancer and Emerging Concepts in Developing Therapeutic Targets

BACKGROUND

Advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) is an aggressive disease whose mutagenic processes are yet to be elucidated. Targeted therapies are urgently needed, but the road from bench to bedside is slowly progressing. In this review, we discuss urothelial carcinoma etiology, along with the most recent advances in UC candidate targeted therapies.

METHODOLOGY

A comprehensive database search was performed. We aimed to review the most recent updates on UC genomics and targeted therapies. Pre-clinical as well as clinical studies were included.

RESULTS

Our review highlights the advances in understanding the molecular basis of urothelial tumorigenesis, including smoking, chemical parasitic carcinogens, inheritance, and APOBEC3 editing enzymes. We discussed how these factors contributed to the current mutational landscape of UC. Therapeutic options for UC are still very limited. However, several promising therapeutic approaches are in development to leverage our knowledge of molecular targets, such as targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR), DNA damage repair pathways, and HER2.

CONCLUSIONS

Blindly testing targeted therapies based on other cancer data is not sufficient. UC-specific biomarkers are needed to precisely use the appropriate drug for the appropriate population. More efforts to understand UC biology and evolution are urgently needed.

China special issue on gastrointestinal tumors-NTRK fusion in a large real-world population and clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA genotyping to guide TRK inhibitor treatment

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are rare oncogenic drivers and targets of TRK inhibitors in solid tumors. Little is known about NTRK fusion in Chinese patients with pan-cancer. Our study investigated the prevalence and genomic features of NTRK1/2/3 gene fusions in 67 883 Chinese patients with pan-cancer using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) NGS to guide TRK inhibitor treatment and resistance monitoring. The prevalence of NTRK fusion (tissue NGS) in the pan-cancer population was 0.18%, with 46 unique NTRK-fusion partner pairs, of which 33 were not previously reported. NTRK2 breakpoint occurred more frequently in intron 15 than intron 12. In colorectal cancers (CRCs), compared to NTRK-negative tumors, NTRK-positive tumors displayed higher tumor mutational burden (TMB) levels (54.6 vs 17.7 mut/Mb, P < .0001). In microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRC, patients with NTRK fusion had a significantly lower TMB than NTRK-negative cases (69.3 vs 79.9 mut/Mb, P = .012). The frequency of NTRK fusion in a ctDNA NGS cohort of 20 954 patients with cancer was similar to that of the tissue NGS cohort. In eight NTRK fusion ctDNA-positive patients, larotrectinib induced objective response in 75% of patients and median progression-free survival was 16.3 months. Blood samples collected from a patient with disease progression after larotrectinib treatment revealed NTRK3 G623R as the potential resistance mechanism. Our study revealed previously unreported NTRK fusion partners, associations of NTRK fusion with MSI and TMB, and the potential utility of ctDNA to screen candidates for TRK inhibitors and monitor drug resistance.

Circulating tumour DNA testing in metastatic breast cancer: Integration with tissue testing

Breast cancer biomarker profiling predominantly relies on tissue testing (surgical and/or biopsy samples). However, the field of liquid biopsy, particularly the analysis of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), has witnessed remarkable progress and continues to evolve rapidly. The incorporation of ctDNA-based testing into clinical practice is creating new opportunities for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ctDNA offers advantages over conventional tissue analyses, as it reflects tumour heterogeneity and enables multiple serial biopsies in a minimally invasive manner. Thus, it serves as a valuable complement to standard tumour tissues and, in certain instances, may even present a potential alternative approach. In the context of MBC, ctDNA testing proves highly informative in the detection of disease progression, monitoring treatment response, assessing actionable biomarkers, and identifying mechanisms of resistance. Nevertheless, ctDNA does exhibit inherent limitations, including its generally low abundance, necessitating timely blood samplings and rigorous management of the pre-analytical phase. The development of highly sensitive assays and robust bioinformatic tools has paved the way for reliable ctDNA analyses. The time has now come to establish how ctDNA and tissue analyses can be effectively integrated into the diagnostic workflow of MBC to provide patients with the most comprehensive and accurate profiling. In this manuscript, we comprehensively analyse the current methodologies employed in ctDNA analysis and explore the potential benefits arising from the integration of tissue and ctDNA testing for patients diagnosed with MBC.

Prevalence and clinico-genomic characteristics of patients with TRK fusion cancer in China

Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions involving NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3 were found in a broad range of solid tumors as driver gene variants. However, the prevalence of NTRK fusions in Chinese solid tumor patients is rarely reported. Based on the next-generation sequencing data from 10,194 Chinese solid tumor patients, we identified approximately 0.4% (40/10,194) of Chinese solid tumor patients with NTRK fusion. NTRK fusions were most frequently detected in soft tissue sarcoma (3.0%), especially in the fibrosarcoma subtype (12.7%). A total of 29 NTRK fusion patterns were identified, of which 11 were rarely reported. NTRK fusion mostly co-occurred with TP53 (38%), CDKN2A (23%), and ACVR2A (18%) and rarely with NTRK amplification (5.0%) and single nucleotide variants (2.5%). DNA-based NTRK fusion sequencing exhibited a higher detection rate than pan-TRK immunohistochemistry (100% vs. 87.5%). Two patients with NTRK fusions showed clinical responses to larotrectinib, supporting the effective response of NTRK fusion patients to TRK inhibitors.

Network approach in liquidomics landscape

Tissue-based biopsy is the present main tool to explore the molecular landscape of cancer, but it also has many limits to be frequently executed, being too invasive with the risk of side effects. These limits and the ability of cancer to constantly evolve its genomic profile, have recently led to the need of a less invasive and more accurate alternative, such as liquid biopsy. By searching Circulating Tumor Cells and residues of their nucleic acids or other tumor products in body fluids, especially in blood, but also in urine, stools and saliva, liquid biopsy is becoming the future of clinical oncology. Despite the current lack of a standardization for its workflows, that makes it hard to be reproduced, liquid biopsy has already obtained promising results for cancer screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and risk of recurrence.Through a more accessible molecular profiling of tumors, it could become easier to identify biomarkers predictive of response to treatment, such as EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer and KRAS mutations in colorectal cancer, or Microsatellite Instability and Mismatch Repair as predictive markers of pembrolizumab response.By monitoring circulating tumor DNA in longitudinal repeated sampling of blood we could also predict Minimal Residual Disease and the risk of recurrence in already radically resected patients.In this review we will discuss about the current knowledge of limitations and strengths of the different forms of liquid biopsies for its inclusion in normal cancer management, with a brief nod to their newest biomarkers and its future implications.

Biphenotypic Immunohistochemical Features and NTRK1 Amplification in Intermediate Cell Carcinoma of the Liver

Intermediate cell carcinoma is one of the rarest forms of primary liver cancer comprising relatively monomorphic populations of neoplastic epithelial cells demonstrating simultaneous positivity of both hepatocyte and cholangiocyte immunohistochemical markers. Here in, we describe an adult male patient who underwent left hepatectomy for a large liver tumor. The pathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed the malignant primary liver cancer with intermediate cell morphology and mixed immunophenotypic features consistent with intermediate cell carcinoma. Furthermore, the genomic profiling using the Next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform demonstrated that there is a novel amplification with copy number gain 12 (12 gene copies) in the Neurotrophic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase 1 (NTRK1) gene, being an oncogenic driver of intermediate cell carcinoma. This is the first case report with the amplification in NTRK1 and emphasizes the importance of molecular oncology.

Neurotrophic tropomyosin receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion positive tumors: a historical cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

NTRK gene fusions have been identified in various tumors; some requiring aggressive therapy and sometimes new TRK inhibitors (TRKi). We aimed to describe a national, unselected, retrospective, multicenter cohort.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients were identified through the French sarcoma diagnostic laboratory at Institut Curie through samples analyzed by RT-qPCR or whole-transcriptome sequencing.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2019, 65 NTRK fusion tumors were identified within 2120 analyses (3.1%): 58 by RNA sequencing (including 20 after RT-qPCR analysis) and 7 exclusively by RT-qPCR. Of the 61 patients identified, 37 patients had infantile soft tissue or kidney fibrosarcomas (IFS), 15 other mesenchymal (Other-MT) and nine central nervous system (CNS) tumors. They encompassed 14 different tumor types with variable behaviors. Overall, 53 patients had surgery (3 mutilating), 38 chemotherapy (20 alkylating agents/anthracycline), 11 radiotherapy, two 'observation strategy' and 13 received TRKi. After a median follow-up of 61.0 months [range, 2.5-226.0], 10 patients died. Five-year overall survival is, respectively, 91.9% [95%CI, 83.5-100.0], 61.1% [95%CI, 34.2-100.0] and 64.8% [95%CI, 39.3-100.0] for IFS, Other-MT, and CNS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NTRK-fusion positive tumors are rare but detection is improved through RNA sequencing. TRKi could be considered at diagnosis for CNS NTRK-fusion positive tumors, some IFS, and Other-MT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not adapted.

Circulating Tumor DNA: The Dawn of a New Era in the Optimization of Chemotherapeutic Strategies for Metastatic Colo-Rectal Cancer Focusing on RAS Mutation

Genotyping of tumor tissues to assess RAS and BRAF V600E mutations enables us to select optimal molecularly targeted therapies when considering treatment strategies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Tissue-based genetic testing is limited by the difficulty of performing repeated tests, due to the invasive nature of tissue biopsy, and by tumor heterogeneity, which can limit the usefulness of the information it yields. Liquid biopsy, represented by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has attracted attention as a novel method for detecting genetic alterations. Liquid biopsies are more convenient and much less invasive than tissue biopsies and are useful for obtaining comprehensive genomic information on primary and metastatic tumors. Assessing ctDNA can help track genomic evolution and the status of alterations in genes such as RAS, which are sometimes altered following chemotherapy. In this review, we discuss the potential clinical applications of ctDNA, summarize clinical trials focusing on RAS, and present the future prospects of ctDNA analysis that could change daily clinical practice.

TRK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and NTRK fusions identified via cell-free DNA analysis

Tissue-agnostic indications for targeted therapies have expanded options for patients with advanced solid tumors. The Food and Drug Administration approvals of the programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib provide rationale for next-generation sequencing (NGS) in effectively all advanced solid tumor patients given potential for clinical responses even in otherwise refractory disease. As proof of concept, this case report describes a 64-year-old woman with triple-negative breast cancer refractory to multiple lines of therapy, found to have a rare mutation on NGS which led to targeted therapy with meaningful response. She initially presented with metastatic recurrence 5 years after treatment for a localized breast cancer, with rapid progression through four lines of therapy in the metastatic setting, including immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugate-based therapy, and chemotherapy. Germline genetic testing was normal. Ultimately, NGS evaluation of cell-free DNA via an 83-gene assay (Guardant Health, Inc.) identified two NTRK3 fusions: an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion associated with the rare secretory breast carcinoma, and CRTC3-NTRK3, a novel fusion partner not previously described in breast cancer. Liver biopsy was sent for whole exome sequencing and RNA-seq analysis of tissue (BostonGene, Inc., Boston, MA, USA), which provided orthogonal confirmation of both the ETV6-NTRK3 and CRTC3-NTRK3 fusions. She was started on the TRK inhibitor larotrectinib with a marked clinical and radiographic response after only 2 months of therapy. The patient granted verbal consent to share her clinical story, images, and data in this case report. This case demonstrates the significant potential benefits of NGS testing in advanced cancer and the lessons we may learn from individual patient experiences.

Circulating Tumor DNA in Identifying Resistant Sub-Clones Post EGFR Blockade: Implications for EGFR Rechallenge

For patients with metastatic RAS/RAF wild-type refractory colorectal cancer, the question of anti-EGFR therapy rechallenge often comes up after initial use. However, not all patients derive benefit. It is now well known that these tumors acquire mechanisms of resistance in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which can be detected on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based testing. We present a series of patients who had serial testing post-EGFR blockade showing its feasibility and value. This would have implications for EGFR rechallenge. We reviewed records for patients who were initially noted to be RAS/RAF wild-type on tissue, who received prior anti-EGFR therapy and then subsequently had at least one circulating tumor DNA-based testing. These patients also had tissue-based genomic testing obtained earlier as part of their standard of care, alongside serial ctDNA-based testing that was done later when subsequent lines of therapy were being decided. The median duration of initial prior anti-EGFR therapy was around 10 months. Known acquired mechanisms of resistance were noted in 100% of the cases. These included KRAS, NRAS, extracellular domain mutations in EGFR, and BRAF mutations. Interestingly, the levels of the sub-clones expressed in variant allele fraction percentage varied and decreased over time in relation to timing of the prior EGFR exposure. Additionally, these were noted to be polyclonal, and the number of clones also varied including some disappearing over time during non-EGFR-based therapy (EGFR holiday). Patients’ post-EGFR blockade may have multiple mechanisms of acquired resistance that can be easily detected on non-invasive liquid biopsies. These patients do not benefit from EGFR rechallenge based on the results of the recently reported CRICKET (NCT02296203) and CAVE (NCT04561336) clinical trials. Furthermore, excluding these patients from EGFR rechallenge is already being adopted in prospectively done clinical trials, e.g., the CHRONOS study (NCT03227926). Rechecking the liquid biopsy plasma RAS/RAF status is one thing that may be incorporated into practice with EGFR rechallenge only a consideration if acquired mechanisms of resistance are absent.

Pre- and post-treatment blood-based genomic landscape of patients with ROS1 or NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors treated with entrectinib

Genomic tumor profiling informs targeted treatment options. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in NTRK fusion-positive (-fp) solid tumors and ROS1-fp non-small cell lung cancer. FoundationOne^® Liquid CDx (F1L CDx), a non-invasive in vitro next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic, detects genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). We evaluated the clinical validity of F1L CDx as an aid in identifying patients with NTRK-fp or ROS1-fp tumors, and assessed the genomic landscape pre- and post-entrectinib treatment. Among evaluable pre-treatment clinical samples (N = 85), positive percentage agreements between F1L CDx and clinical trial assays (CTAs) were 47.4% (NTRK fusions) and 64.5% (ROS1 fusions); positive predictive value was 100% for both. The objective response rate for CTA+ F1L CDx+ patients was 72.2% in both cohorts. The median duration of response significantly differed between F1L CDx+ and F1L CDx- samples in ROS1-fp (5.6 vs. 17.3 months) but not NTRK-fp (9.2 vs. 12.9 months) patients. Fifteen acquired resistance mutations were detected. We conclude that F1L CDx is a clinically valid complement to tissue-based testing to identify patients who may benefit from entrectinib and those with acquired resistance mutations associated with disease progression.

Belgian expert consensus for tumor-agnostic treatment of NTRK gene fusion-driven solid tumors with larotrectinib

Fusions of NTRK (neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase) genes with 5' partner genes can result in the expression of chimeric proteins that drive oncogenesis through ligand-independent kinase activation. Despite variable frequencies of NTRK fusions in different tumor types, the fact that they are common to a wide range of cancers raises the possibility of developing tumor-agnostic treatments specifically targeting NTRK fusion products, irrespective of tumor type. The first-generation Trk (tropomyosin receptor kinase) inhibitor, larotrectinib, was the first tumor-agnostic treatment of NTRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children, to be approved in the European Union. This consensus, developed by a Belgian multidisciplinary expert panel, aims to highlight the unmet medical need associated to NTRK fusion-driven cancer treatment and, based on current knowledge of NTRK fusions and larotrectinib treatment outcome and safety, provide comprehensive guidance to oncologists regarding NTRK fusion-driven cancer diagnostics and the best use of larotrectinib in real-world clinical settings. Larotrectinib; NTRK gene fusion; Trk inhibitor; Tumor-agnostic; Expert opinion; Oncogene proteins; Protein kinase inhibitors.

Plasma-Based Genotyping in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Molecular genotyping for advanced solid malignancies has transformed the clinical management of patients with metastatic disease. Treatment decisions in a growing number of tumors require knowledge of molecularly driven alterations in order to select optimal targeted therapy. Although genomic testing of tumor tissue is the gold standard for identifying targetable genomic alterations, biopsy samples are often limited or difficult to access. This has paved the way for the development of plasma-based approaches for genomic profiling. Recent advances in the detection of plasma-circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the integration of plasma-based molecular profiling into clinical practice as an alternative or complementary tool for genomic testing in the setting of advanced cancer, to facilitate the identification of driver mutations to guide initial treatment and diagnose resistance. Several guidelines now recommend the use of plasma where tumor tissue is limited to identify a targetable genomic alteration. Current plasma-based assays can evaluate multiple genes in comprehensive panels, and their application in advanced disease will be increasingly incorporated into standard practice. This review focuses on current and future applications of plasma ctDNA-based assays in advanced solid malignancies, while highlighting some limitations in implementing this technology into clinical practice.