Resectability, conversion, metastasectomy and outcome according to RAS and BRAF status for metastatic colorectal cancer in the prospective RAXO study

Young-onset metastatic colorectal cancer: an opportunity and a vision for progress in cancer

Metastatic young-onset colorectal cancer (yo-CRC) is a distinct and aggressive disease subtype that is becoming increasingly prevalent worldwide with Australia leading the world in this trend. This article provides an evidence-based perspective, through the prism of authors' personal experience, to craft an effective pathway not only to deliver improved outcomes for the patients but also to reduce disparities and foster collaboration amongst the cancer-treating community and indeed patients. It highlights an opportunity to re-define, re-design, and create a model that is rewarding to patients and cancer-treating community. Although our focus is on the high unmet needs group of yo-CRC, this model has the potential to expand to other cancer types and care models. We analyse the unique epidemiological trends, challenges, and burdens, emphasising the need for tailored treatment approaches for younger patients with colorectal cancer especially in the metastatic setting. We identify current gaps in clinical practice and research. To improve real-world outcomes, we propose a conceptual framework to enhance clinician-patient communication and treatment planning. Central to our approach is the integration of a Registry of Incidence, Intervention, and Outcomes (RIIO), which enables real-time data collection and analysis, improving treatment personalisation and efficacy. This registry could revolutionise patient care and drive research innovation through enhanced data sharing and collaboration. We advocate for a patient-centric integrated care model that utilises all available therapies to maximise survival and quality of life. Our perspective underscores the urgent need for a paradigm shift in how yo-CRC is viewed, researched and managed, proposing a pathway to significantly enhanced outcomes. Whilst it is feasible to expand the concepts discussed here for all colorectal cancer and indeed all cancer types, we believe this approach is most relevant and acutely needed in yo-CRC setting for reasons detailed in the manuscript.

Initial Assessment of Resectability of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Versus Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Surgery improves long-term survival for resectable, liver-only metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With no consensus definition of "resectable" disease, decisions regarding resectability are reliant on the expertise and judgement of the treating clinician working in consultation with a multidisciplinary team (MDT). This study examines the clinical outcome versus initial assessment of resectability in an Australian population with mCRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with liver-only mCRC diagnosed January 2009 to December 2022 were identified from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry. Patients were classified based on prospectively documented treatment assessment as "resectable," "potentially resectable," or "unresectable." The correlation between initial assessment of resectability and clinical outcome, and any impact of clinicopathologic factors were examined. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed overall survival based on initial resectability assessment and resection status.

RESULTS

Of 4437 patients with mCRC identified through TRACC, 1250 (28%) had liver-only disease at presentation, with 497 (43%), 277 (24%), and 374 (33%) classified as "unresectable," "potentially resectable," and "resectable," respectively. In total, 516 (41%) ultimately underwent surgical resection, including 30 (6%) of the "initially unresectable," 148 (53%) of the "potentially resectable," and 338 (90%) of the "resectable" at a median of 9.5, 5.9, and 2.4 months from the diagnosis of liver metastases, respectively. Resection in the "unresectable" patient population was associated with younger age (mean age 63 vs. 69, P = .0006), better performance status (ECOG 0-1 100% vs. 74%, P = .0017), and fewer comorbidities (Charlson index 0-3 in 73% vs. 53%, P = .0296) compared with no resection. Median overall survival was longer for resected versus nonresected patients across all categories: "unresectable" (59.2 vs. 17.6 months, P < .0001), "potentially resectable" (57.2 vs. 22.8 months, P < .0001), and "resectable" (108 vs. 55 months, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This real-world study demonstrates the potential for "initially unresectable" patients to become surgical candidates following systemic therapy, more likely in younger and fitter patients, with overall excellent survival outcomes in resected patients. This highlights the value of routine, repeated MDT assessments for patients with liver-only disease who are continuing to respond to systemic therapy, even for those initially considered never to be surgical candidates.

BRAF mutations and survival with surgery for colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in the BRAF gene (BRAFmut) are associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with liver metastases and the potential benefits of liver resection in patients with BRAFmut CRC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Controlled Trials, and Embase databases was conducted on May 31, 2023. The inclusion criteria were as follows:1) reporting of outcomes in patients with BRAFmut CRC who underwent surgery for liver metastases and/or comparison of outcomes between those who underwent and those who did not undergo resection; 2) reporting of survival information as hazard ratios (HR); and 3) publication in English.

RESULTS

34 studies were included. Median follow up was 48 months for prognostic BRAF status meta-analysis. BRAFmut status showed a significantly increased risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-3.22; P < 0.01) and relapse (HR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.44-2.71; P < 0.01). Resection of liver metastases was associated with a survival benefit (median follow up 46 months). The HR for survival was 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.59; P < 0.01) in favor of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

and Relevance: Our analysis indeed confirms that BRAF mutation is associated with poor survival outcomes after liver resection of CRC metastases. However, upon quantitatively assessing the survival benefit of surgical intervention in patients with BRAF-mutated CRC liver metastases, we identified a significant 56% reduction in the risk of death.

Colorectal Cancer Pulmonary Metastasectomy: When, Why and How

Colorectal cancer is the third-most-diagnosed cancer in males and in females, representing 8% of estimated new cases, and the third cause of cancer-related death in both sexes, accounting for 9% of cancer deaths in men and 8% in women. About 20% of patients diagnosed with CRC present metastatic disease. Although lung metachronous or synchronous metastatic spread without other involved sites has been reported in only a small proportion of patients, considering that this tumor is frequently diagnosed, the clinical approach to CRC pulmonary metastases represents a major issue for thoracic surgeons and CRC oncologists. Among patients diagnosed with pulmonary metastases from CRC, about 9-12% are eligible for local treatments with radical intent, including surgical resection, SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy) and ablation therapy. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials among different local strategies, there is no definitive evidence about the optimal approach, although surgical resection is considered the most effective therapeutic option in this clinical scenario. Oncological achievement of primary radical resection, the biology of primary tumor and metastatic sites, disease free interval and or progression free survival are independent prognostic factors which make it possible to define a cohort of patients which might significantly benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy.

Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Demographics, Resectability, Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Finnish Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (Subgroup Analysis of the RAXO Study)

The primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with the phenotype, metastatic sites, mutations, and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, but this has mostly been studied according to sidedness (right vs. left sided). We studied right colon vs. left colon vs. rectal PTL in a real-life study population (n = 1080). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed multi-cross-sectionally with QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, EQ-5D, and 15D. A chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare the groups. The PTL was in the right colon in 310 patients (29%), the left colon in 396 patients (37%), and the rectum in 375 patients (35%). The PTL was associated with distinct differences in metastatic sites during the disease trajectory. The resectability, conversion, and resection rates were lowest in the right colon, followed by the rectum, and were highest in the left colon. Overall survival was shortest for right colon compared with left colon or rectal PTL (median 21 vs. 35 vs. 36 months), with the same trends after metastasectomy or systemic therapy only. PTL also remained statistically significant in a multivariable model. The distribution of symptoms varied according to PTL, especially between the right colon (with general symptoms of metastases) and rectal PTL (with sexual- and bowel-related symptoms). mCRC, according to PTL, behaves differently regarding metastatic sites, resectability of the metastases, outcomes of treatment, and HRQoL.

BRAFV600E Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Perspective from a Patient, a Caregiver, and an Oncologist

This article has been co-authored by a patient with right-sided BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), his caregiver, and an oncologist. Here the patient and caregiver discuss their personal experiences struggling with cancer, including their fears, expectations, and attitudes as the disease progresses. The oncologist describes how patients with BRAFV600E mCRC are treated and how the management strategy can be balanced to mitigate any side effects. Improved diagnostic techniques and the availability of numerous treatment options, including various chemotherapy schemes and molecular-targeted drugs, can aid rapid implementation of treatment algorithms. The pivotal roles of patients' associations in the general support of patients and those close to them, and in facilitating the link with healthcare professionals, are highlighted in this perspective piece.