Predictive power of home blood pressure measurement for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: KAMOGAWA-HBP study

Impact of diabetic status and contribution of office and home blood pressure across diabetic status for cardiovascular disease: the J-HOP study

Few studies have investigated whether the prognostic power of home blood pressure (BP) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events differs across subjects with different diabetic status. We used the dataset of the J-HOP (Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure) study, which enrolled patients having cardiovascular risks to investigate relationships between home BP and CVD events. We classified the patients as having diabetes mellitus (DM), prediabetes or normal glucose metabolism (NGM) as follows: for DM, a self-reported history of physician-diagnosed DM and/or use of DM medication, a fasting plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL, a casual plasma glucose level ≥200 mg/dL or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% (n = 1034); for prediabetes, HbA1c of 5.7-6.4% (n = 1167), and for NGM, those who remained (n = 2024). CVD outcome was defined as coronary artery disease, stroke or heart failure. During a median 6.2 ± 3.8 years of follow-up, 259 CVD events occurred. Analysis found both prediabetes (Unadjusted Hazard ratio [uHR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.95), and DM (uHR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.59-2.85) as risks of CVD compared to NGM. In DM, patients with a 10-mmHg elevation of office systolic BP (SBP) and morning home SBP had 16% and 14% higher risks for CVD events. In the prediabetes group, only an elevated morning home SBP conferred a risk of CVD events (uHR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31), but this association did not hold for the adjusted model. Like DM, prediabetes should be recognized as a risk for CVD events, albeit weakly. Elevated home BP contributes to increased CVD risk in diabetes. Our study demonstrated the impact of prediabetes and diabetes on CVD and the impact of office and home BP on CVD events in each group.

Seven-action approaches for the management of hypertension in Asia - The HOPE Asia network

Asia is a large continent and there is significant diversity between countries and regions. Over the last 30 years, absolute blood pressure (BP) levels in Asia have increased to a greater extent than those in other regions. In diverse Asia‐Pacific populations, for choosing an Asia‐specific approach to hypertension management is important to prevent target organ damage and cardiovascular diseases. In this consensus document of HOPE Asia Network, we introduce seven action approaches for management of hypertension in Asia.

Annual reports on hypertension research 2020

In 2020, 199 papers were published in Hypertension Research. Many excellent papers have contributed to progress in research on hypertension. Here, our editorial members have summarized eleven topics from published work and discussed current topics in depth. We hope you enjoy our special feature, Annual Reports on Hypertension Research.

Can Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Detect the Presence of Exxaggerated Morning Blood Pressure Surge in Newly Diagnosed Treatment-Naive Hypertensive Patients?

Background: The exaggerated morning blood pressure surge (MS) is associated with target organ damage and cardiovascular events. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) has been detected as a useful marker in tumors and cardiovascular diseases. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of hypertension is a well-known issue. We aimed to investigate whether there is an association between SII and exaggerated MS in newly diagnosed treatment-naive hypertensive patients.Material and Methods: In total, 343 newly diagnosed in clinical and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring treatment-naive hypertensive patients were included in this study. Morning surge was defined as the difference between morning BP, which was the mean of BP during 2 h after wake-up, and the lowest BP, which was the mean of three lowest BP during nighttime. A cutoff value of 52.1 mmHg was used to discriminate the high- and low value MS groups. SII was calculated based on neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts.Results: Neutrophil, platelet, SII, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were higher, whereas lymphocyte counts were lower in the high-value MS than the low-value MS. These indices were all independently associated with exaggerated MS and SII was superior to all other indices for detecting the presence of exaggerated MS. SII was moderately correlated with morning BP surge (r: 0.489, p < 0.0001).Conclusion: SII was higher in patients with exaggerated MS and was independently associated with exaggerated MS. Furthermore, SII might be a better indicator than platelet, neutrophil, lymphocyte, NLR, and PLR for the presence of exaggerated MS.