1
|
Koop-Monteiro Y. Including animals in sociology. CURRENT SOCIOLOGY. LA SOCIOLOGIE CONTEMPORAINE 2023; 71:1141-1158. [PMID: 37719066 PMCID: PMC10499549 DOI: 10.1177/00113921211065492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
How do we include animals in sociology? Although sociology's initial avoidance of the nonhuman world may have been necessary to the field's development, recent scholarship - within mainstream sociology, environmental sociology and animal-centred research - is helping expand the field's horizons. With a focus on variety, this article reviews four key paths that researchers are taking to include animals in their research: (1) studying interspecies relations, (2) theorizing animals as an oppressed group, (3) investigating the social and ecological impacts of animal agriculture and (4) analysing social-ecological networks. This review shows how applying - and innovating - existing social theories and research methods allows researchers to include animals in their analyses and will be relevant to a variety of scholars, including mainstream and environmental sociologists, animal-focused researchers and social network analysts, to name a few.
Collapse
|
2
|
Salgueiro-Otero D, Barnes ML, Ojea E. Climate adaptation pathways and the role of social-ecological networks in small-scale fisheries. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15526. [PMID: 36109527 PMCID: PMC9478087 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18668-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Climate change is expected to have increasing impacts on marine ecosystems which will threaten the livelihoods and wellbeing of millions of people. Drawing on social-ecological network and sociodemographic data collected via face-to-face interviews with 404 small-scale commercial fishers from 9 Galician communities (Spain), we empirically examine the adaptation pathways that fishers follow when they face hypothetical impacts on their fishery resources and test the role of five social-ecological network structures on fisher’s stated intended responses to such scenarios. Our results show that fishers generally intend to follow a ‘remain—adapt—transform—exit (the fishery)’ pathway when faced with increasing climate impacts. Next, we demonstrate that trust-based bonding ties and ties to informal leaders are associated with a ‘business-as-usual’ strategy. In contrast, communicative bonding ties are associated with adaptive responses, while communicative bridging ties are associated with transformative and exit strategies. Our findings provide key empirical insight that broaden our understanding of the intricate relationship between social networks and adaptive behaviour relevant to social-ecological systems worldwide.
Collapse
|
3
|
Lindkvist E, Pellowe KE, Alexander SM, Drury O'Neill E, Finkbeiner EM, Girón‐Nava A, González‐Mon B, Johnson AF, Pittman J, Schill C, Wijermans N, Bodin Ö, Gelcich S, Glaser M. Untangling social-ecological interactions: A methods portfolio approach to tackling contemporary sustainability challenges in fisheries. FISH AND FISHERIES (OXFORD, ENGLAND) 2022; 23:1202-1220. [PMID: 36247348 PMCID: PMC9546375 DOI: 10.1111/faf.12678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Meeting the objectives of sustainable fisheries management requires attention to the complex interactions between humans, institutions and ecosystems that give rise to fishery outcomes. Traditional approaches to studying fisheries often do not fully capture, nor focus on these complex interactions between people and ecosystems. Despite advances in the scope and scale of interactions encompassed by more holistic methods, for example ecosystem-based fisheries management approaches, no single method can adequately capture the complexity of human-nature interactions. Approaches that combine quantitative and qualitative analytical approaches are necessary to generate a deeper understanding of these interactions and illuminate pathways to address fisheries sustainability challenges. However, combining methods is inherently challenging and requires understanding multiple methods from different, often disciplinarily distinct origins, demanding reflexivity of the researchers involved. Social-ecological systems' research has a history of utilising combinations of methods across the social and ecological realms to account for spatial and temporal dynamics, uncertainty and feedbacks that are key components of fisheries. We describe several categories of analytical methods (statistical modelling, network analysis, dynamic modelling, qualitative analysis and controlled behavioural experiments) and highlight their applications in fisheries research, strengths and limitations, data needs and overall objectives. We then discuss important considerations of a methods portfolio development process, including reflexivity, epistemological and ontological concerns and illustrate these considerations via three case studies. We show that, by expanding their methods portfolios, researchers will be better equipped to study the complex interactions shaping fisheries and contribute to solutions for sustainable fisheries management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kara E. Pellowe
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
- School of Marine SciencesUniversity of MaineWalpoleMaineUSA
| | - Steven M. Alexander
- Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooOntarioCanada
- Environment and Biodiversity Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Elena M. Finkbeiner
- Center for Oceans, Conservation InternationalHonoluluHawaiiUSA
- Coastal Science and PolicyUniversity of California Santa CruzSanta CruzCaliforniaUSA
| | - Alfredo Girón‐Nava
- Stanford Center for Ocean SolutionsStanford UniversityPalo AltoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Andrew F. Johnson
- MarFishEco Fisheries ConsultantsEdinburghUK
- School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, The Lyell Centre, Institute of Life and Earth SciencesMarineSPACE Group, Heriot‐Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
| | - Jeremy Pittman
- School of PlanningUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooOntarioCanada
| | - Caroline Schill
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
- Beijer Institute of Ecological EconomicsRoyal Swedish Academy of SciencesStockholmSweden
| | - Nanda Wijermans
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Örjan Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience CentreStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
| | - Stefan Gelcich
- Center for Applied Ecology and Sustainability (CAPES)Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
- Instituto Milenio en Socio‐ecología costera (SECOS)SantiagoChile
| | - Marion Glaser
- Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT)BremenGermany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gautier M, Moreau PA, Boury B, Richard F. Unravelling the French National Fungal Database: Geography, Temporality, Taxonomy and Ecology of the Recorded Diversity. J Fungi (Basel) 2022; 8:jof8090926. [PMID: 36135651 PMCID: PMC9504494 DOI: 10.3390/jof8090926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Large datasets are highly valuable resources to investigate multi-scale patterns of organisms, and lay foundations for citizen science-based conservation strategies. Here, we used 1,043,262 records from 1708 to 2021 to explore the geography, taxonomy, ecology and distribution patterns of 11,556 fungal taxa in metropolitan France. Our analysis reveals a four-phase pattern of temporal recording, with a main contribution of post-1977 observations in relation with the structuration of associative mycology. The dataset shows an uneven geography of fungal recording. Four clusters of high-intensity sampling scattered across France contrast with poorly documented areas, including the Mediterranean. Basidiomycota and Agaricales highly dominate the dataset, accounting for 88.8 and 50.4% of records, respectively. The dataset is composed of many rare taxa, with 61.2% of them showing fewer than 100 records, and 20.5% recorded only once. The analysis of metadata brings to light a preponderance of the mycorrhizal guild (44.6%), followed by litter saprotrophs (31.6%) and wood saprotrophs (18.1%). Highly documented forests (76.3% of records) contrast with poorly investigated artificial (6.43%) and open habitats (10.1%). This work provides the first comprehensive overview of fungal diversity in France and identifies the Mediterranean area and open habitats as priorities to integrate into a global strategy for fungal conservation in France.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Montan Gautier
- Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive (UMR CEFE), University Montpellier-CNRS-EPHE-IRD, 1919 route de Mende, CEDEX 5, F-34293 Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre-Arthur Moreau
- Laboratoire de Génie Civil et géo-Environnement (ULR 4515-LGCgE), University Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
- Association pour le développement d’outils naturalistes et informatiques pour la Fonge (AdoniF), 3 rue du Pr Laguesse, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Béatrice Boury
- Association pour le développement d’outils naturalistes et informatiques pour la Fonge (AdoniF), 3 rue du Pr Laguesse, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Franck Richard
- Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive (UMR CEFE), University Montpellier-CNRS-EPHE-IRD, 1919 route de Mende, CEDEX 5, F-34293 Montpellier, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Barnes ML, Jasny L, Bauman A, Ben J, Berardo R, Bodin Ö, Cinner J, Feary DA, Guerrero AM, Januchowski‐Hartley FA, Kuange JT, Lau JD, Wang P, Zamborain‐Mason J. ‘Bunkering down’: How one community is tightening social‐ecological network structures in the face of global change. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Michele L. Barnes
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | - Lorien Jasny
- Department of Politics University of Exeter Exeter UK
| | - Andrew Bauman
- Department of Marine and Environmental Sciences Nova Southeastern University Fort Lauderdale Florida USA
| | - Jon Ben
- Lae Morobe Province Papua New Guinea
| | - Ramiro Berardo
- School of Environment and Natural Resources The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USA
| | - Örjan Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | - Joshua Cinner
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
| | | | - Angela M. Guerrero
- Stockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
- Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | | | - John T. Kuange
- The Wildlife Conservation Society Goroka Eastern Higlands Province Papua New Guinea
| | - Jacqueline D. Lau
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
- WorldFish Batu Maung Penang Malaysia
| | - Peng Wang
- Centre for Transformative Innovation Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Jessica Zamborain‐Mason
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
- College of Science and Engineering James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
- Department of Nutrition Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Boston Massachusetts USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tindall D, McLevey J, Koop-Monteiro Y, Graham A. Big data, computational social science, and other recent innovations in social network analysis. CANADIAN REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY = REVUE CANADIENNE DE SOCIOLOGIE 2022; 59:271-288. [PMID: 35286014 DOI: 10.1111/cars.12377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
While sociologists have studied social networks for about one hundred years, recent developments in data, technology, and methods of analysis provide opportunities for social network analysis (SNA) to play a prominent role in the new research world of big data and computational social science (CSS). In our review, we focus on four broad topics: (1) Collecting Social Network Data from the Web, (2) Non-traditional and Bipartite/Multi-mode Networks, including Discourse and Semantic Networks, and Social-Ecological Networks, (3) Recent Developments in Statistical Inference for Networks, and (4) Ethics in Computational Network Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Tindall
- Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John McLevey
- Department of Knowledge Integration, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yasmin Koop-Monteiro
- Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander Graham
- Department of Knowledge Integration, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Felipe-Lucia MR, Guerrero AM, Alexander SM, Ashander J, Baggio JA, Barnes ML, Bodin Ö, Bonn A, Fortin MJ, Friedman RS, Gephart JA, Helmstedt KJ, Keyes AA, Kroetz K, Massol F, Pocock MJO, Sayles J, Thompson RM, Wood SA, Dee LE. Conceptualizing ecosystem services using social-ecological networks. Trends Ecol Evol 2021; 37:211-222. [PMID: 34969536 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Social-ecological networks (SENs) represent the complex relationships between ecological and social systems and are a useful tool for analyzing and managing ecosystem services. However, mainstreaming the application of SENs in ecosystem service research has been hindered by a lack of clarity about how to match research questions to ecosystem service conceptualizations in SEN (i.e., as nodes, links, attributes, or emergent properties). Building from different disciplines, we propose a typology to represent ecosystem service in SENs and identify opportunities and challenges of using SENs in ecosystem service research. Our typology provides guidance for this growing field to improve research design and increase the breadth of questions that can be addressed with SEN to understand human-nature interdependencies in a changing world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María R Felipe-Lucia
- Department Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Angela M Guerrero
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Kräftriket 2B, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden; Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Steven M Alexander
- Environmental Change and Governance Group, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Jaime Ashander
- Resources for the Future, 1616 P St. NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA
| | - Jacopo A Baggio
- School of Politics, Security and International Affairs, National Center for Integrated Coastal Research, 4297 Andromeda Loop N, Orlando, FL 32816, USA
| | - Michele L Barnes
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia
| | - Örjan Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Kräftriket 2B, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Aletta Bonn
- Department Ecosystem Services, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany; German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstrasse 4, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburgerstraße 159, 07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Marie-Josée Fortin
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
| | - Rachel S Friedman
- Institute for Climate, Energy and Disaster Solutions, Australian National University College of Science, Building 141, Linnaeus Way, Acton, ACT, 2601, Australia
| | - Jessica A Gephart
- Department of Environmental Science, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA
| | - Kate J Helmstedt
- School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St., Brisbane, City, QLD, 4000, Australia
| | - Aislyn A Keyes
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Ramaley Biology, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
| | - Kailin Kroetz
- School of Sustainability, Arizona State University and Resources for the Future, PO Box 875502, Tempe, AZ 85287-5502, USA
| | - François Massol
- University of Lille, CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019, UMR 9017, Center for Infection and Immunity of Lille (CIIL), F-59000 Lille, France
| | | | - Jesse Sayles
- ORISE Postdoctoral Fellow Appointed with the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Atlantic Coastal Environmental Sciences Division, 27 Tarzwell Dr., Narragansett, RI 02882, USA
| | - Ross M Thompson
- Centre for Applied Water Science, Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, ACT, 2617, Australia
| | - Spencer A Wood
- College of the Environment, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Laura E Dee
- School of Sustainability, Arizona State University and Resources for the Future, PO Box 875502, Tempe, AZ 85287-5502, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arlidge WNS, Firth JA, Alfaro-Shigueto J, Ibanez-Erquiaga B, Mangel JC, Squires D, Milner-Gulland EJ. Assessing information-sharing networks within small-scale fisheries and the implications for conservation interventions. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE 2021; 8:211240. [PMID: 34853699 PMCID: PMC8611325 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The effectiveness of behavioural interventions in conservation often depends on local resource users' underlying social interactions. However, it remains unclear to what extent differences in related topics of information shared between resource users can alter network structure-holding implications for information flows and the spread of behaviours. Here, we explore the differences in nine subtopics of fishing information related to the planned expansion of a community co-management scheme aiming to reduce sea turtle bycatch at a small-scale fishery in Peru. We show that the general network structure detailing information sharing about sea turtle bycatch is dissimilar from other fishing information sharing. Specifically, no significant degree assortativity (degree homophily) was identified, and the variance in node eccentricity was lower than expected under our null models. We also demonstrate that patterns of information sharing between fishers related to sea turtle bycatch are more similar to information sharing about fishing regulations, and vessel technology and maintenance, than to information sharing about weather, fishing activity, finances and crew management. Our findings highlight the importance of assessing information-sharing networks in contexts directly relevant to the desired intervention and demonstrate the identification of social contexts that might be more or less appropriate for information sharing related to planned conservation actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William N. S. Arlidge
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
- Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany
- Faculty of Life Sciences, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstrasse 42, 10115 Berlin, Germany
| | - Josh A. Firth
- Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
- Merton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joanna Alfaro-Shigueto
- ProDelphinus, Calle José Galvez 780-E, Lima 15074, Perú
- School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
- Carrera de Biologia Marina, Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú
| | - Bruno Ibanez-Erquiaga
- Section for Coastal Ecology, Technical University of Denmark, National Institute of Aquatic Resources (DTU Aqua), Lyngby 2800, Denmark
- Asociación CONSERVACCION, Lima, Peru
| | - Jeffrey C. Mangel
- ProDelphinus, Calle José Galvez 780-E, Lima 15074, Perú
- School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
| | - Dale Squires
- NOAA Fisheries Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - E. J. Milner-Gulland
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Conservation Science, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Voutsa V, Battaglia D, Bracken LJ, Brovelli A, Costescu J, Díaz Muñoz M, Fath BD, Funk A, Guirro M, Hein T, Kerschner C, Kimmich C, Lima V, Messé A, Parsons AJ, Perez J, Pöppl R, Prell C, Recinos S, Shi Y, Tiwari S, Turnbull L, Wainwright J, Waxenecker H, Hütt MT. Two classes of functional connectivity in dynamical processes in networks. J R Soc Interface 2021; 18:20210486. [PMID: 34665977 PMCID: PMC8526174 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2021.0486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The relationship between network structure and dynamics is one of the most extensively investigated problems in the theory of complex systems of recent years. Understanding this relationship is of relevance to a range of disciplines-from neuroscience to geomorphology. A major strategy of investigating this relationship is the quantitative comparison of a representation of network architecture (structural connectivity, SC) with a (network) representation of the dynamics (functional connectivity, FC). Here, we show that one can distinguish two classes of functional connectivity-one based on simultaneous activity (co-activity) of nodes, the other based on sequential activity of nodes. We delineate these two classes in different categories of dynamical processes-excitations, regular and chaotic oscillators-and provide examples for SC/FC correlations of both classes in each of these models. We expand the theoretical view of the SC/FC relationships, with conceptual instances of the SC and the two classes of FC for various application scenarios in geomorphology, ecology, systems biology, neuroscience and socio-ecological systems. Seeing the organisation of dynamical processes in a network either as governed by co-activity or by sequential activity allows us to bring some order in the myriad of observations relating structure and function of complex networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venetia Voutsa
- Department of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany
| | - Demian Battaglia
- Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (UMR 1106), Marseille, France
- University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Studies (USIAS), Strasbourg 67083, France
| | | | - Andrea Brovelli
- Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), Marseille, France
| | - Julia Costescu
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Mario Díaz Muñoz
- Department of Sustainability, Governance and Methods, Modul University Vienna, 1190 Vienna, Austria
| | - Brian D. Fath
- Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, Maryland 21252, USA
- Advancing Systems Analysis Program, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg 2361, Austria
- Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Funk
- Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management (IHG), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria
- WasserCluster Lunz - Biologische Station GmbH, Dr. Carl Kupelwieser Promenade 5, 3293 Lunz am See, Austria
| | - Mel Guirro
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Thomas Hein
- Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management (IHG), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria
- WasserCluster Lunz - Biologische Station GmbH, Dr. Carl Kupelwieser Promenade 5, 3293 Lunz am See, Austria
| | - Christian Kerschner
- Department of Sustainability, Governance and Methods, Modul University Vienna, 1190 Vienna, Austria
- Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Christian Kimmich
- Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
- Regional Science and Environmental Research, Institute for Advanced Studies, 1080 Vienna, Austria
| | - Vinicius Lima
- Aix-Marseille Université, Inserm, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes (UMR 1106), Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS, Institut de Neurosciences de la Timone (UMR 7289), Marseille, France
| | - Arnaud Messé
- Department of Computational Neuroscience, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg University, Germany
| | | | - John Perez
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Ronald Pöppl
- Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Universitätsstr. 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Prell
- Department of Cultural Geography, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonia Recinos
- Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecosystem Management (IHG), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna (BOKU), 1180 Vienna, Austria
| | - Yanhua Shi
- Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Shubham Tiwari
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Laura Turnbull
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - John Wainwright
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Harald Waxenecker
- Department of Environmental Studies, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Marc-Thorsten Hütt
- Department of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University Bremen, 28759 Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ainsworth TD, Leggat W, Silliman BR, Lantz CA, Bergman JL, Fordyce AJ, Page CE, Renzi JJ, Morton J, Eakin CM, Heron SF. Rebuilding relationships on coral reefs: Coral bleaching knowledge-sharing to aid adaptation planning for reef users: Bleaching emergence on reefs demonstrates the need to consider reef scale and accessibility when preparing for, and responding to, coral bleaching. Bioessays 2021; 43:e2100048. [PMID: 34351637 DOI: 10.1002/bies.202100048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Coral bleaching has impacted reefs worldwide and the predictions of near-annual bleaching from over two decades ago have now been realized. While technology currently provides the means to predict large-scale bleaching, predicting reef-scale and within-reef patterns in real-time for all reef users is limited. In 2020, heat stress across the Great Barrier Reef underpinned the region's third bleaching event in 5 years. Here we review the heterogeneous emergence of bleaching across Heron Island reef habitats and discuss the oceanographic drivers that underpinned variable bleaching emergence. We do so as a case study to highlight how reef end-user groups who engage with coral reefs in different ways require targeted guidance for how, and when, to alter their use of coral reefs in response to bleaching events. Our case study of coral bleaching emergence demonstrates how within-reef scale nowcasting of coral bleaching could aid the development of accessible and equitable bleaching response strategies on coral reefs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracy D Ainsworth
- Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - William Leggat
- School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Brian R Silliman
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA
| | - Coulson A Lantz
- Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Jessica L Bergman
- Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander J Fordyce
- School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Charlotte E Page
- Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Juliana J Renzi
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joseph Morton
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Beaufort, North Carolina, USA
| | - C Mark Eakin
- NOAA Coral Reef Watch, College Park, Maryland, USA
- Global Science and Technology, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
| | - Scott F Heron
- Physical Sciences and Marine Geophysics Laboratory, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wineland SM, Fovargue R, York B, Lynch AJ, Paukert CP, Neeson TM. Is there enough water? How bearish and bullish outlooks are linked to decision maker perspectives on environmental flows. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2021; 280:111694. [PMID: 33248815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Policies that mandate environmental flows (e-flows) can be powerful tools for freshwater conservation, but implementation of these policies faces many hurdles. To better understand these challenges, we explored two key questions: (1) What additional data are needed to implement e-flows? and (2) What are the major socio-political barriers to implementing e-flows? We surveyed water and natural resource decision makers in the semi-arid Red River basin, Texas-Oklahoma, USA, and used social network analysis to analyze their communication patterns. Most respondents agreed that e-flows can provide important benefits and identified the same data needs. However, respondents sharply in their beliefs on other issues, and a clustering analysis revealed two distinct groups of decision makers. One cluster of decision makers tended to be bearish, or pessimistic, and believed that: current flow conditions are not adequate, there are many serious socio-political barriers to implementation, water conflicts will likely increase in the future, and climate change is likely to exacerbate these issues. The other cluster of respondents was bullish, or optimistic: they foresaw fewer future water conflicts and fewer socio-political barriers to implementation. Despite these differences, both clusters largely identified the same data needs and barriers to e-flows implementation. Our social network analysis revealed that the frequency of communication between clusters was not significantly different than the frequency of communication within clusters. Overall, our results suggest that the different perspectives of decision-makers could complicate efforts to implement e-flows and proactively plan for climate change. However, there are opportunities for collaboration on addressing common data needs and barriers to implementation. Overall, our study provides a key socio-environmental perspective on e-flows implementation from a semi-arid and socio-politically complex river basin and contextualizes the many challenges facing e-flows implementation in river basins globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Wineland
- Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
| | - Rachel Fovargue
- Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| | - Betsey York
- Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, USA
| | - Abigail J Lynch
- U.S. Geological Survey, National Climate Adaptation Science Center, USA
| | - Craig P Paukert
- U.S. Geological Survey, Missouri Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, The School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, USA
| | - Thomas M Neeson
- Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
AbstractThe provision of plant health has public good attributes when nobody can be excluded from enjoying its benefits and individual benefits do not reduce the ability of others to also benefit. These attributes increase risk of free-riding on plant health services provided by others, giving rise to a collective action problem when trying to ensure plant health in a region threatened by an emerging plant disease. This problem has traditionally been addressed by government intervention, but top-down approaches to plant health are often insufficient and are increasingly combined with bottom-up approaches that promote self-organization by affected individuals. The challenge is how to design plant health institutions that effectively deal with the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant diseases, while staying aligned with the preferences, values and needs of affected societies. Here, we illustrate how Ostrom’s design principles for collective action can be used to guide the incorporation of bottom-up approaches to plant health governance in order to improve institutional fit. Using the ongoing epidemic of huanglongbing (HLB) as a case study, we examine existing institutions designed to ensure citrus health under HLB in Brazil, Mexico, the United States and Argentina, and discuss potential implications of Ostrom’s design principles for the collective provision of plant health under HLB and other plant diseases that are threatening food security worldwide. The discussion leads to an outline for the interdisciplinary research agenda that would be needed to establish the link between institutional approaches and plant health outcomes in the context of global food security.
Collapse
|
13
|
Firkowski CR, Schwantes AM, Fortin MJ, Gonzalez A. Monitoring social–ecological networks for biodiversity and ecosystem services in human-dominated landscapes. Facets (Ott) 2021. [DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The demand the human population is placing on the environment has triggered accelerated rates of biodiversity change and created trade-offs among the ecosystem services we depend upon. Decisions designed to reverse these trends require the best possible information obtained by monitoring ecological and social dimensions of change. Here, we conceptualize a network framework to monitor change in social–ecological systems. We contextualize our framework within Ostrom’s social–ecological system framework and use it to discuss the challenges of monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem services across spatial and temporal scales. We propose that spatially explicit multilayer and multiscale monitoring can help estimate the range of variability seen in social–ecological systems with varying levels of human modification across the landscape. We illustrate our framework using a conceptual case study on the ecosystem service of maple syrup production. We argue for the use of analytical tools capable of integrating qualitative and quantitative knowledge of social–ecological systems to provide a causal understanding of change across a network. Altogether, our conceptual framework provides a foundation for establishing monitoring systems. Operationalizing our framework will allow for the detection of ecosystem service change and assessment of its drivers across several scales, informing the long-term sustainability of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Rauen Firkowski
- Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
| | - Amanda M. Schwantes
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
| | - Marie-Josée Fortin
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3B2, Canada
| | - Andrew Gonzalez
- Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jacob U, Beckerman A, Antonijevic M, Dee LE, Eklöf A, Possingham HP, Thompson R, Webb TJ, Halpern BS. Marine conservation: towards a multi-layered network approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2020; 375:20190459. [PMID: 33131435 PMCID: PMC7662205 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Valuing, managing and conserving marine biodiversity and a full range of ecosystem services is at the forefront of research and policy agendas. However, biodiversity is being lost at up to a thousand times the average background rate. Traditional disciplinary and siloed conservation approaches are not able to tackle this massive loss of biodiversity because they generally ignore or overlook the interactive and dynamic nature of ecosystems processes, limiting their predictability. To conserve marine biodiversity, we must assess the interactions and impacts among biodiversity and ecosystem services (BD-ES). The scaling up in complexity from single species to entire communities is necessary, albeit challenging, for a deeper understanding of how ecosystem services relate to biodiversity and the roles species have in ecosystem service provision. These interactions are challenging to map, let alone fully assess, but network and system-based approaches provide a powerful way to progress beyond those limitations. Here, we introduce a conceptual multi-layered network approach to understanding how ecosystem services supported by biodiversity drive the total service provision, how different stressors impact BD-ES and where conservation efforts should be placed to optimize the delivery of ecosystem services and protection of biodiversity. This article is part of the theme issue 'Integrative research perspectives on marine conservation'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ute Jacob
- Helmholtz-Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB), Ammerländer Heerstrasse 231, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Andrew Beckerman
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mira Antonijevic
- ach and krach GmbH, Branddesign, Grindelberg 17, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura E. Dee
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Anna Eklöf
- Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Linköping University, Linköping 581 83, Sweden
| | - Hugh P. Possingham
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia
| | - Ross Thompson
- Centre for Applied Water Science, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Thomas J. Webb
- Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Benjamin S. Halpern
- National Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 735 State Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101-5504, USA
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hedlund J, Bodin Ö, Nohrstedt D. Policy issue interdependency and the formation of collaborative networks. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Hedlund
- Stockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | - Örjan Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience Centre Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Brown C, Rounsevell M. How can social–ecological system models simulate the emergence of social–ecological crises? PEOPLE AND NATURE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Calum Brown
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK‐IFU) Department of Geo‐Ecology (IFGG) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Garmisch‐Partenkirchen Germany
| | - Mark Rounsevell
- Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research Atmospheric Environmental Research (IMK‐IFU) Department of Geo‐Ecology (IFGG) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Garmisch‐Partenkirchen Germany
- School of Geosciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Addressing the global decline of coral reefs requires effective actions from managers, policymakers and society as a whole. Coral reef scientists are therefore challenged with the task of providing prompt and relevant inputs for science-based decision-making. Here, we provide a baseline dataset, covering 1300 km of tropical coral reef habitats globally, and comprised of over one million geo-referenced, high-resolution photo-quadrats analysed using artificial intelligence to automatically estimate the proportional cover of benthic components. The dataset contains information on five major reef regions, and spans 2012–2018, including surveys before and after the 2016 global bleaching event. The taxonomic resolution attained by image analysis, as well as the spatially explicit nature of the images, allow for multi-scale spatial analyses, temporal assessments (decline and recovery), and serve for supporting image recognition developments. This standardised dataset across broad geographies offers a significant contribution towards a sound baseline for advancing our understanding of coral reef ecology and thereby taking collective and informed actions to mitigate catastrophic losses in coral reefs worldwide. Measurement(s) | ecosystem • coral reef • composition | Technology Type(s) | automated image annotation • machine learning | Factor Type(s) | year of data collection • geographic location | Sample Characteristic - Organism | Anthozoa • Algae • Porifera | Sample Characteristic - Environment | marine coral reef biome • marine coral reef fore reef | Sample Characteristic - Location | Atlantic Ocean • Eastern Australia • Indian Ocean • Southeast Asia • Pacific Ocean • Great Barrier Reef |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: 10.6084/m9.figshare.13007516
Collapse
|
18
|
Kluger LC, Gorris P, Kochalski S, Mueller MS, Romagnoni G. Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens: A systematic review. PEOPLE AND NATURE 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lotta C. Kluger
- Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research (ZMT) Bremen Germany
- University of Bremenartec Sustainability Research Center Bremen Germany
| | - Philipp Gorris
- Institute of Environmental Systems Research (IUSF) Osnabrueck University Osnabrueck Germany
| | - Sophia Kochalski
- Department of Biology and Ecology of Fishes Leibniz‐Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Berlin Germany
| | - Miriam S. Mueller
- Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoUnidad Académica Mazatlán Mazatlan Mexico
- German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation Isle of Vilm Putbus Germany
| | - Giovanni Romagnoni
- Department of Biosciences Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES) University of Oslo Oslo Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pisani E, Andriollo E, Masiero M, Secco L. Intermediary organisations in collaborative environmental governance: evidence of the EU-funded LIFE sub-programme for the environment (LIFE-ENV). Heliyon 2020; 6:e04251. [PMID: 32715114 PMCID: PMC7371759 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In the framework of the collaborative environmental governance and specifically of network concepts, this study makes an exploratory analysis of the EU-funded LIFE sub-programme for the Environment (LIFE-ENV) and its priority area Environment and Resource Efficiency focused on the role of networks and in particular of intermediary organizations by using Social Network Analysis (SNA). More specifically, by investigating the evolving pattern of key statistics (density, clustering coefficient, betweenness and degree centrality) related to bipartite (organisations and projects) and dynamic (eleven years) networks, we identified 3003 organisations and 1006 projects and studied how they operate by forming new relations and reorganising existing connections. Results evidence that the LIFE-ENV attests a structural coherence and a stable structure over time and it is characterised by four different structures of network components, namely isolated coordinating beneficiary, isolated components, small components and giant components. Moreover, the LIFE-ENV is not a cohesive network, due to low values of both density and clustering coefficient. Based on betweenness centrality and degree centrality measures, the LIFE-ENV sub-programme has facilitated the emergence of 4855 intermediary organisations, which equals 29.5% of the total number of coordinating and associate beneficiaries involved in the programme in the eleven years considered. Transnational cooperation in the LIFE-ENV sub-programme is characterised by a different intensity of relations: some countries (i.e. Italy, Spain and Belgium) implement transnational cooperation with multiple European countries in both the North and South of Europe, while others tend to cluster with countries in the same geographical area, and lastly East European countries have limited participation in transnational cooperation. Our analysis supports the hypothesis of a declining collective action in the LIFE-ENV sub-programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Pisani
- Dip. Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali of the Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Elena Andriollo
- Dip. Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali of the Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Mauro Masiero
- Dip. Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali of the Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| | - Laura Secco
- Dip. Territorio e Sistemi Agro-Forestali of the Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Guerrero AM, Barnes M, Bodin Ö, Chadès I, Davis KJ, Iftekhar MS, Morgans C, Wilson KA. Key considerations and challenges in the application of social-network research for environmental decision making. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2020; 34:733-742. [PMID: 31943349 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Attempts to better understand the social context in which conservation and environmental decisions are made has led to increased interest in human social networks. To improve the use of social-network analysis in conservation, we reviewed recent studies in the literature in which such methods were applied. In our review, we looked for problems in research design and analysis that limit the utility of network analysis. Nineteen of 55 articles published from January 2016 to June 2019 exhibited at least 1 of the following problems: application of analytical methods inadequate or sensitive to incomplete network data; application of statistical approaches that ignore dependency in the network; or lack of connection between the theoretical base, research question, and choice of analytical techniques. By drawing attention to these specific areas of concern and highlighting research frontiers and challenges, including causality, network dynamics, and new approaches, we responded to calls for increasing the rigorous application of social science in conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Guerrero
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
| | - M Barnes
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, 4811, QLD, Townsville, Australia
| | - Ö Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Chadès
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- CSIRO, Ecosciences Precinct, 4102, QLD, Dutton Park, Australia
| | - K J Davis
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute, University of Exeter Business School, EX4 4PU, Exeter, Xfi Building, Rennes Drive, U.K
| | - M S Iftekhar
- Centre for Environmental Economics & Policy, UWA School of Agriculture & Environment, M087, The University of Western Australia, 6009, WA, Perth, Australia
| | - C Morgans
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
| | - K A Wilson
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, 4072, QLD, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nyström M, Jouffray JB, Norström AV, Crona B, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Carpenter SR, Bodin Ö, Galaz V, Folke C. Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature 2019; 575:98-108. [PMID: 31695208 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Much of the Earth's biosphere has been appropriated for the production of harvestable biomass in the form of food, fuel and fibre. Here we show that the simplification and intensification of these systems and their growing connection to international markets has yielded a global production ecosystem that is homogenous, highly connected and characterized by weakened internal feedbacks. We argue that these features converge to yield high and predictable supplies of biomass in the short term, but create conditions for novel and pervasive risks to emerge and interact in the longer term. Steering the global production ecosystem towards a sustainable trajectory will require the redirection of finance, increased transparency and traceability in supply chains, and the participation of a multitude of players, including integrated 'keystone actors' such as multinational corporations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Nyström
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - J-B Jouffray
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Academy Programme, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A V Norström
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Crona
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Academy Programme, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Søgaard Jørgensen
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Academy Programme, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S R Carpenter
- Center for Limnology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Ö Bodin
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - V Galaz
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Academy Programme, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Folke
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.,Global Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere Academy Programme, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden.,Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Bodin Ö, Alexander S, Baggio J, Barnes M, Berardo R, Cumming G, Dee L, Fischer AP, Fischer M, Mancilla-Garcia M, Guerrero A, Hileman J, Ingold K, Matous P, Morrison T, Nohrstedt D, Pittman J, Robins G, Sayles J. Improving network approaches to the study of complex social-ecological interdependencies. NATURE SUSTAINABILITY 2019; 2:551-559. [PMID: 35342825 PMCID: PMC8943905 DOI: 10.1038/s41893-019-0308-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Achieving effective, sustainable environmental governance requires a better understanding of the causes and consequences of the complex patterns of interdependencies connecting people and ecosystems within and across scales. Network approaches for conceptualizing and analyzing these interdependencies offer one promising solution. Here, we present two advances we argue are needed to further this area of research: (i) a typology of causal assumptions explicating the causal aims of any given network-centric study of social-ecological interdependencies; (ii) unifying research design considerations that facilitate conceptualizing exactly what is interdependent, through what types of relationships, and in relation to what kinds of environmental problems. The latter builds on the appreciation that many environmental problems draw from a set of core challenges that re-occur across contexts. We demonstrate how these advances combine into a comparative heuristic that facilitates leveraging case-specific findings of social-ecological interdependencies to generalizable, yet context-sensitive, theories based on explicit assumptions of causal relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ö. Bodin
- Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
- corresponding author:
| | - S.M. Alexander
- National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, University of Maryland, Annapolis, MD 21401, USA
| | - J. Baggio
- Department of Political Science and Sustainable Coastal Systems Cluster, National Center for Integrated Coastal Research, University of Central Florida, Orlando, 32816, USA
| | - M.L. Barnes
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
| | - R. Berardo
- School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - G.S. Cumming
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
| | - L. Dee
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA
| | - A. P. Fischer
- School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - M. Fischer
- Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Eawag, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - M. Mancilla-Garcia
- Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A. Guerrero
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia
| | - J. Hileman
- Stockholm University, Stockholm Resilience Centre, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K. Ingold
- Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Eawag, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland
- Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
- Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - P. Matous
- The University of Sydney, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technologies, 2006 New South Wales, Australia
| | - T.H. Morrison
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
| | - D. Nohrstedt
- Department of Government, and Center for Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS), Uppsala University, 75120 Uppsala, Sweden
| | - J. Pittman
- School of Planning, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - G. Robins
- Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia; Faculty of Business and Law, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J. Sayles
- ORISE Fellow Appointed with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology Division, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|